· 150 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 25, 2026 at 1:07 AM

Europeans must recognize US, China and Russia are ‘dead against’ us, says Macron

Posted by Free-Minimum-5844


Europeans must recognize US, China and Russia are ‘dead against’ us, says Macron
POLITICO
Europeans must recognize US, China and Russia are ‘dead against’ us, says Macron
French president also said he expected tensions with the U.S. to outlast Trump

🚩 Report this post

150 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Althusser_Was_Right 19 hr ago +1500
New Red Alert expansion is a bit too real for me.
1500
ApplicationRoyal865 14 hr ago +194
"Unit Ready. Possibly the greatest unit of all time. People say that all the time." "*Krasnov reporting in"*
194
Dependent_Rain_4800 8 hr ago +27
Building.. On hold.. Canceled.. On hold.. Building...
27
bigdaddyt2 9 hr ago +7
SPaCEee time
7
afiefh 7 hr ago +1
> "Unit Ready. Possibly the greatest unit of all time. People say that all the time." If they make a RedAlert game covering the time between 2010-2030 and don't make the US voice actor do a Trump impression I'll be disappointed!
1
YeetCompleet 17 hr ago +48
C&C Generals is still ongoing too
48
BackInStonia 13 hr ago +8
Reminds me of Rise of the Reds mod for Generals
8
Le_Flemard 14 hr ago +4
ECA comeback.
4
MaddST 15 hr ago +256
The funny thing is that future games that depict US as the bad guys would likely use a Trump-like character as President.
256
daniel_22sss 12 hr ago +117
Third Red Alert game already had US president who was actually a puppet of their enemy.
117
Tramonto83 10 hr ago +30
"Go, commander, and... grab them by the p****!"
30
Medallicat 9 hr ago +16
Battlefield 6 has NATO and America at war with each other
16
Short_Switch_1807 15 hr ago +48
Command & Conquer: Red Alert 4: Allies No More
48
axelkoffel 13 hr ago +54
Command and Conquer: Orange Alert
54
Opskynet 18 hr ago +78
With Donald Trump voice?
78
badcatdog42 14 hr ago +43
With historical quotes! "I could shoot somebody..." etc
43
ImhotepsServant 11 hr ago +2
God I hope not.
2
badcatdog42 9 hr ago +3
"Just grab em by the p****!"
3
Flat_Tire_Again 9 hr ago +3
The Ayatollah and his gang got their pussies grabbed hard eh!
3
Medium-Recording7780 15 hr ago +17
But what will be EU's superweapon ?
17
Respaced 14 hr ago +73
Working institutions
73
SuperRockyHobbyHorse 13 hr ago +35
The only remaining countries people want to do business and sign treaties with
35
Angryfunnydog 12 hr ago +23
Proper healthcare maybe, idk
23
jhaand 10 hr ago +4
Since the US military now wants to stop the Flu vaccinations. This might be the real strength.
4
Fernheijm 6 hr ago +1
Next thing they'll go back to eating next to the latrines, can't have woke things like hygiene.
1
badcatdog42 14 hr ago +26
Ukraine drones!
26
General_High_Ground 9 hr ago +5
Against US best weapon is some sort of a bioweapon (virus for example). Half of the population wouldn't be willing to vaccinate and those who would, wouldn't be able to afford it anyway.
5
Rafoel 12 hr ago +5
[Maybe this.](https://d2wrwj382xgrci.cloudfront.net/Pictures/480xany/1/6/6/16166_tetheredcap_148785.png)
5
Positive-Road3903 14 hr ago +19
strongly worded letters
19
mildlyornery 16 hr ago +37
I'm escaping to the one place that hasn't been corrupted by capitalism… SPACE!
37
Ediwir 15 hr ago +8
Come along, dear friend! just sign [here, here, and initials here](https://youtu.be/vvANy49Kqhw?si=e_e18LwTuD0L2LgA).
8
John_Mark_Corpuz_2 18 hr ago +28
More like that "Rise of the Reds" mod for C&C Generals if you picked the ECA against a teamed up Russia, China, and USA.
28
Lanster27 12 hr ago +10
On the bright side, new rendition of Hell March!
10
1stprime_of_apophis 12 hr ago +6
There's an alternate universe out there where in 2000 they hired Donald Trump to play the president in Red Alert 2 instead of Ray Wise, one of us in that timeline mentions that on a post referencing RA2 pondering what if he actually did become president & we all say "heh, yeah what if.." and then never talk to each other again.
6
CupcakeSeaShanty 17 hr ago +18
EndWar which came out nearly 20 years ago. I thought the geopolitical situation was batshit, but here we go: https://sgb_tachanka.artstation.com/projects/YWk1q
18
angry_burmese 11 hr ago +4
Also Tom Clancy’s Endwar
4
Ancient-Bat1755 13 hr ago +2
F***, sorry . We will do better.
2
ElPadrote 7 hr ago +1
Fight, Win, Prevail!
1
R3tr0N3wB 16 hr ago +782
They're concerned with us becoming a coalition; If Europe, the United Kingdom, and Canada acted as one bloc, they’d become a much stronger economic player and that means more competition and would shift the balance.
782
Lustytapeworm 13 hr ago +344
Pls take Aus too 🥹
344
UnproSpeller 13 hr ago +185
And new zealand and paupua new guinea too and all the island nations down our way
185
clm1859 12 hr ago +64
Also needs japan, south korea, singapore and Taiwan. And NZ ofc. Plus India, the only way to contend with the manpower of china and america. Any country that aspires to be a western democracy essentially.
64
gravel3400 12 hr ago +19
China, sure, but America doesn’t have manpower? Europe as is is already double the population.
19
Infusion1999 12 hr ago +25
Skeptical about saingapore and india, I think Chile, Uruguay and the like are more likely
25
clm1859 11 hr ago +4
I mean i can see india maybe just try to stay out of it and be the only one not bombed to rubble at the end. And that could be how they become the next super power. Kind of like america wanted to do in WW2, before getting dragged into it anyway. But singapore won't have the option of staying out, seeing as how the strait of malacca will be highly contested. And they are all about the rule of law, so i struggle seeing them choosing the side of the trumps and putins of the world.
4
LordDeathScum 11 hr ago +7
India has a policy of total and utter neutrality, doubt they would even consider it.
7
Ulricchh 11 hr ago +8
Japan would be with the US most definitely and Taiwan just ceases to exist in this timeline if the US allies China. Europe simply can't currently warranty Taiwan's freedom like the US can. So they would just get annexed or fight until they are destroyed
8
clm1859 11 hr ago +3
True about taiwan. But why would japan ally with america? Murica has also dropped them like a hot potato when they pledged to help taiwan. And america has withdrawn the marine expeditionary unit from japan to send to iran and took air defense systems from south korea (and maybe also from japan) for the same reason. And at the same time jacked up japans energy prices. The japanese must be just as pissed at them as the rest of us and america can't defend them after wasting half of their interceptors on iran.
3
The9isback 10 hr ago +3
Because there isn't a timeline where Japan would ally with China, and without American muscle, Japan would be the next territorial target for China after Taiwan. The strategic importance of Japan's position and the long historical and racial hatred means that if Japan turns its back on America, they would be turning right into subjugation by China.
3
clm1859 10 hr ago +2
Except america and china might ally. They and russia all want the same: a 1984 style world, where they can rule absolutely and unchallenged about their own spheres of influence. Meaning get rid of all middle powers first, then split the cake up after. Doesnt mean it will hold long term. But the soviets and nazis also worked together to conquer poland.
2
Ulricchh 9 hr ago +3
So you think japan would rather be conquered and demolished by China instead of staying as America's sphere of influence and 2nd most loyal ally? Staying in America's sphere warranties Japan's safety against China in this hypothetical scenario. An alliance with Europe wouldn't accomplish anything since Europe currently can't project power in the south east Asian sea region
3
yopla 9 hr ago +5
If you think we'll take Australia I have a submarine to sell you... Oh wait...
5
whorificustotalus 8 hr ago +3
Australia is a bit like India in that it's very interested in playing all sides. Just look at their recent critical mineral agreement with China, signed a couple of weeks after their FTA with the EU.
3
AnEagleisnotme 12 hr ago +9
Maybe we would be friendlier if you bought the submarines
9
frosty-thesnowbitch 7 hr ago +1
Anzac is automatically included because the UK wouldn't join without you all being at least offered inclusion.  The UK is scary not because of the UK but because of who we bring to the party. 
1
the_mooseman 6 hr ago +1
Oh thats nice to hear, thanks big bro.
1
jugalator 6 hr ago +1
We already brought you into the Eurovision Song Contest and you're handling that rite of passage well, so why not!
1
majinspy 9 hr ago +27
As an American I'm all for a world of western democracies uniting. I had just hoped we'd be in it. Your problem is what it's always been: different cultures, languages, and economies. When Italians will die in the fields of Poland and the Germans care about the economies of southern Europe, then you'll be a real bloc. I encourage it, but at this pace you'll need two centuries. Europeans just don't see themselves as European, but instead, as Germans, Spanish, and Belgians.
27
Current_Focus2668 9 hr ago +2
They don't want the 'middle powers' united.
2
give_me_your_body 14 hr ago +96
Only a united Rome could resist the three of them /s
96
Chicory-Coffee 14 hr ago +290
I think it's absolutely clear the traitor in charge is carrying out a plan that's been years in the making. It will absolutely turn its sights on every last democratic nation in Europe once it's finished taking the US down. I really hope Europe is prepared and wìĺĺ prevail. I hate watching our (probably former) allies cut us loose. But it needs to be done.  Our job as US citizens now, is to take back our government from the fascist administration rooted into our nation's Capitol so we don't end up going to war WITH Europe. I can't believe this is what it has come to. MAGA brought us to the end of our 250 years of constitutional democracy. Yet here we truly are.
290
Respaced 14 hr ago +125
US needs to get money out of politics. If not it will end up at the same place again even after Trump is gone.
125
Chicory-Coffee 11 hr ago +18
Agreed. It's asinine that bribery, oh I mean lobbying, is acceptable in the first place. Who are the politicians representing? Their constituents or their donors? Unfortunately changing this would involve the support of the politicians who are benefitting from it, it would be a hard sell.  But you can bet that the mega corporations who lobby and create that conflict of interest in politics will turn around and make their employees sign conflict of interest forms as a condition to work for them.
18
Tango_D 12 hr ago +13
Honestly, I don't think that's possible without a whole new constitution.
13
MootRevolution 11 hr ago +36
Yeah, about that. That constitution of yours has proven to be full of holes. Those precious 'checks and balances' are completely gone. You're going to need a complete overhaul of your constitution and institutions, and a show of applying actual consequences for breaking the law, for anyone outside of the US to ever put trust in you again.
36
ImpressiveAmount4684 8 hr ago +3
A constitution is only as strong as the people upholding it. German democracy fell the same way.
3
Tango_D 12 hr ago +5
Capitalism itself has taken over American politics. I don't see it as possible to separate the two without fundamental constitutional reform that exclueldes congress from having a say.
5
WarbossPepe 13 hr ago +23
Very curious to see how you guys look like once the orange gremlin is gone. So much of your soft power has been relinquished, I feel like the whoever is in charge come 2028 is going to be picking up the bill
23
The9isback 10 hr ago +17
Dude, that question was already asked once during Covid. They reelected the guy. People need to realise Trump isn't the cause, he is a sympton
17
TSwiftIcedTea 9 hr ago +3
The symptom of a broken election system that continually allows a minority party to control large swaths of government.
3
relaxguy2 9 hr ago +1
Wasn’t a minority this time tho. Yes our system gave them absolute power but 75% of Americans were super super ok with this.
1
BigBananaBerries 9 hr ago +2
Sadly, a lot of good people are going to suffer when the country needs to take its medicine for being ran on greed, hate & division for generations. The American Dream that we've heard so much about seems to amount to, *grab as much as you can & f*** everyone else.* It's not a feasible recipe for longevity.
2
SoylentGrunt 12 hr ago +4
The withdrawl of soft power was intended to create chaos which works in favor of US plans of destabilization. The money saved is now spent on hard power. Any country getting aid from another country knows there'll be strings attatched after dealing with the US. The loans Ukraine got in the last war came with the stipulation that Ukraine land be sold to foreign investors.
4
BanForLife1 13 hr ago +28
I dont think that changes much.American democrasy is sick. 2 team system is failing miserably in this world.
28
Apprehensive-Bus5172 13 hr ago +3
Thank you, single member plurality voting system!
3
GroundZeroMstrNDR 10 hr ago +9
Even if you get rid of this idiot I still think european countries should detach as much as possible from the US and limit all economic and cultural influences, regardless of the next administration
9
Jolly_Farm9068 11 hr ago +3
I hate Trump's vulgarity, but I cringe any time I read that he's all to blame. His international policies are decades in the making, and they're not his. The US has been shifting its focus from Russia to China. It needs Europe to counter Russia on it's own. The US know that Europe has little interest in fighting China. NATO was built to counter Russia, not China. As the US shifts its focus towards China it's predictable that they're not so interested in NATO anymore. Again, I hate and despise Trump as a human being as well as the way he conducts himself while president, but it's ridiculous to say and think his international policies are all his doing. They're mostly not.
3
[deleted] 19 hr ago +319
[removed]
319
hamsterwheel 16 hr ago +53
There are a million shills on Listnook trying to whitewash China constantly.
53
nediamnori 18 hr ago +164
China to Europe is an economic threat at most. The remaining two have threatened direct military actions against Europe.
164
Muted-Tradition-1234 15 hr ago +39
China's policy is to ensure Russia does not fail in Ukraine (as they are concerned Europe might otherwise assist the US in focusing on Asia). That's more than an "economic" threat.
39
Pexkokingcru 14 hr ago
China's policy is to make money, that's why 97% of Ukraine's drone are from China.
0
Potential-Wish8608 14 hr ago +10
This is extremely misleading. It is only the small, civilian drones (under 7kg) used for recon and similar purposes and, as far as I know, they are also being replaced with ukrainian made ones.
10
goldcakes 14 hr ago +2
And the parts from these ‘made in Ukraine’ drones are coming from where exactly? China. Chinese companies are practically selling the same parts to both nations and that’s exactly how they like it.
2
Potential-Wish8608 14 hr ago +5
Use google mate, it’s fairly easy. For the 7-25 kg drones the chinese parts percentage is 32% and for the over 25kg drones the chinese parts percentage is 9.5%
5
MissPandaSloth 14 hr ago +7
It absolutely isn't. China has imperial goals beyond "just making money". Don't mix up unable with not wanting.
7
evilparagon 14 hr ago +7
Considering that Europe (especially France) has been expanding economic and defence agreements towards Australia, China very much remains a military threat to Europeans. Australia would very much like its allies to show up if it’s also committing to show up if Russia attacks European allies.
7
Asleep-Ad1182 18 hr ago +137
China literally hacks into European governments
137
Linus_Naumann 17 hr ago +92
That's regular hybrid conflict though. Do you think Europeans do not also actively spy and shape power structures wherever they can? Some of us even still have elaborate colonial structures around the world (Brazil is a neighbouring country of France). China is a power player, but they are not "against us" in the same way Russia is against us (aka willing to sacrifice everything, men, wealth, just to rule and subdue us). Orange man might be more actively against us than China, threatening direct violence.
92
StockCasinoMember 17 hr ago +30
Ya but China will also be the ones supplying Russia if they did invade.
30
Fwellimort 16 hr ago +43
China will supply both sides. Same with US. Countries just want to make money. Why not sell to both sides? Let's be honest. Europe is probably trying to hack for intel of China. The only reason we don't see it is because European news channels are not going to report such cases. Same with US on Europe. And US on China. China on Taiwan. And so forth. Every nation is doing the same shit. You think freaking Germany isn't spying on even its neighbors like France?
43
TheEdelBernal 17 hr ago +19
And they will also supply Europe if that happens.
19
Critical-Row7985 17 hr ago +21
Sure. And USA doesn't? Cyber spying is rife. I'm pretty sure every major and mid power has some cyber psyops going on.
21
Ryokan76 17 hr ago +12
Yes, but they also threaten military invasion and annexation, which was the point.
12
Jemsy1 17 hr ago +1
Both the United States and Russia participate, CCP takes cyber warfare to another level.
1
Evatelypapri 16 hr ago +11
Where's your source they take to another level?
11
goutezmoicettefarce 16 hr ago +17
It is not just an economic threat though. We are also in a situation where we have opposed society models competing against one another. Quasi autocracies, unfettered capitalism, mass surveillance and illiberal societies. Europe has its own distinct model and unless we stand strong we are going to be culturally and politically influenced by other models.
17
Medium-Pitch-5768 16 hr ago +15
Have you heard of Ukraine? China is supporting Russia
15
Zubba776 16 hr ago +34
Dear lord this is a daft comment... why do you think Russia is materially able to wage war on Ukraine this long?
34
StockCasinoMember 17 hr ago +22
Even if China didn’t invade militarily, they support those who might. If Russia actually decided to invade parts of Europe, China gonna be right there in the background making sure they are well supplied. And that is before you get into everything else.
22
Skythewood 18 hr ago +22
Potential threat, yes. Imminent threat, no. We usually judge by their actions, not words. Just compare the number of overseas military bases Europe, US, Russia and China has, and you will have an idea of how threatening each entity is.
22
UnionBalloonCorps 18 hr ago -4
Mind boggling simplified stupid metric.
-4
MissPandaSloth 14 hr ago +2
Yep. People mix up unable to not wanting all the time. And unable can change fast.
2
Hicklethumb 17 hr ago -1
China has not invaded another country in pretty much 50 years. Their last invasion was against Vietnam, for two weeks, because Vietnam invaded one of their own neighbours and China told them to stop. Threatening the concept of democracy from an ideals perspective? Sure. Threatening it with violence and force? Highly unlikely.
-1
AmbotnimoP 17 hr ago +26
They're literally occupying islands that belong to the Philippines—by violence and force.
26
Zubba776 16 hr ago +8
Totally. They haven't invaded any countries outside of the genocide they're committing against the Uyghurs, and their lands, and the cultural genocide they committed by literally trucking in Han to displace Tibetans in Tibet. Then the outright invasion of Vietnam where they got their ass handed to them, the encroachments on Indian territory, the whole ridiculous 9 dash line claims in the SCS... but yeah, totally, outside of THOSE China has never leaned on anyone.
8
MissPandaSloth 14 hr ago +5
Hey, it's not a big deal if you are doing active ethnic cleansing in 2026 to the lands you occupied prior! Didn't you knew? Bad stuff has to be 1:1 to something something US, otherwise it doesn't count.
5
Emotional_Plant3241 17 hr ago +5
When China has comparable strength to the USA, you think that would change? All it takes is one absolute-leader-for-life to decide it's worth a go.
5
UnionBalloonCorps 17 hr ago +7
Let’s see what you think when they invade Taiwan or crackdown on Hong Kong again.
7
theorizable 15 hr ago +1
The bots have infiltrated the US. I have no idea if the people I'm talking to are even real anymore.
1
beseri 13 hr ago +68
Absolutely. Our alliance with the USA is pretty much dead.
68
BaneOfMyLife 14 hr ago +67
We figured that out ages ago. And there’s no distinction between US and Russia, US is a Russian asset and Americans are bent over taking it. So much for the right to arms.
67
PlanktonInitial7945 13 hr ago +45
If the right to bear arms actually gave US citizens any advantage over their government, it would've been removed from the constitution a loooooong time ago.
45
BaneOfMyLife 13 hr ago +41
This is true, it’s just for shooting up school kids apparently
41
Azhrei 12 hr ago +21
*...the real reason it was written was so you could form a militia to fight a tyrannical government. In case the government became a bunch of cunts, you could all get your guns and fight back, and that's why it was written. Yeah!* *And that made a hell of a lot of sense when it was just muskets. But you do know the government has drones, right? You get that? You’re bringing guns to a drone fight!* - Jim Jefferies He's absolutely correct. All the right to bear arms does these days is give Republicans some rah-rah we're so free talking points and push automatic weapons into the hands of a populace eager to use them on each other. Including little children. It is utterly pointless against a government spying on its own citizens and who can end any potential gathering of would-be revolutionaries with a single, inexpensive drone strike.
21
Koala_eiO 9 hr ago +4
It's also useless because the people who are the most likely to enjoy guns are the right-wing ones, so those most likely to be happy with a "tyrannical" government as long as it hurts someone else.
4
Direct-Fix-2097 10 hr ago +8
And they’re enjoying it. You don’t vote for it twice and have a rabid fan base if you’re not enjoying taking those loads every day like the w**** they are. (Miss me with the “I didn’t vote for it and neither did 22% of the nation”, it’s irrelevant, your nation voted for the clown twice, your country wants it and loves it. Pipe down, and vote him out comprehensively next election cycle if you wanna say otherwise. And the next one, and the next one. But you won’t, America will always gobble GOP c***, cos they have such a strange voter base obsessed with fox and religion.)
8
Wonderful-Pause1048 19 hr ago +29
Well, most people are aware of that by now. But with some, you really have to wonder…
29
Short_Switch_1807 19 hr ago +53
Good bye Pax Americana, hello Dark Ages 2
53
Dimi7rozavar 14 hr ago +41
What did China do to us? What am I missing?
41
lynortis 12 hr ago +60
They are too successful.
60
infidel11990 12 hr ago +41
Provide material support to Russia. Without which the Russians would have been doing even worse in their war of aggression against Ukraine. And that's just for starters.
41
light_to_shaddow 10 hr ago +7
Do go on
7
dattokyo 12 hr ago +42
China has spent decades stealing intellectual properties from Europe (to the point where countries like Denmark now bans Chinese students from certain educational faculties). China is the main economic lifeline of Russia (to the point where it's highly unlikely they'd have been able to continue their war without them, as China is the main lifeline out of their sanctions), and supplies them with tech needed for their attacks on Ukraine. China is a supporter of Iran, and supplies them with both intel and tech. China is the only supporter of North Korea. China actively threatens, and has in fact upped their stance against, Taiwan - a firmly pro-western democracy. China killed the freedoms and western-alignment of Hong Kong in less than 12 months, including hiring thugs to beat up protesters. China has a long track record of jailing journalists and political dissidents. China runs ~~concentration camps~~"re-education through labor" camps. China had, and in some countries still has, unofficial hidden Chinese police stations in foreign countries, including in Europe, set up to bring back Chinese citizens (particularly those who fled China). The list goes on. edit: typo
42
bucciarati 11 hr ago +26
it's more eu and us companies profited a lot from delocalization to china without thinking about the consequences but only THEIR short / mid term profits.
26
Salford1969 16 hr ago +13
Hello darkness my old friend The World is fucked and getting worse daily
13
Elegant_Emu952 7 hr ago +3
Unfortunately, yes. The in-charge US Republican Party, ruled by Trump, is anti-democracy and is siding with depraved dictators.
3
mion81 16 hr ago +7
Russia too? Not Russia! /s
7
5u114 14 hr ago +29
The biggest threats are USA and Russia, both of whom see EUrope as something that can be divided between them. Certainly under Putin, and Putin's asset Trump, this appears to be the pretty obvious goal. While China may be a threat in the long term, or in an abstract sense ... I think they are the best option right now to form an alliance.
29
infidel11990 12 hr ago +18
A united Europe with UK and Canada as allies, does not need an alliance with China. A partnership over trade and other matters is more than enough. Nor is a Chinese alliance a good idea for Europe in the long term. They may not be as belligerent as the US and Russia now, but they do ultimately want to dominate, similar to the US.
18
Retr0gasm 12 hr ago +26
Don't make the mistake of thinking China is any better than Russia or the US. They're arguably worse, but they're a counter weight to the US excesses at the moment, which makes them a potential partner. But never an ally. Have you forgotten China's wolf warrior diplomacy? Their police stations on other nations souvereign territory? Their aggressive economic policy to secure harbors? China is a partner until they can't dictate chinese police in your country. Turning around from US dependency into a chinese one would be a major mistake. We're just going to have to accept that Europe has to stand on its' own, and play the US and China against each other. Russia isn't even relevant to this discussion. They had an outsized effect on world politics for a long time, but they're a small player, and now they're locked down by Ukraine for the forseeable future.
26
totallyRebb 10 hr ago +4
All of which are currently headed by dictators or dictator adjacent old psychos. Insanity. The world is regressing thanks to them.
4
Esamers99 18 hr ago +14
The U.S. is busy with Donny turning the lever on and off on the Hormuz straight, China is watching in glee and Russia is coming under alot of internal strain. Makes me wonder if China will start playing it's hand in Eurasia before pressuring Europe.
14
Shiriru00 14 hr ago +17
I don't think China has expansionist views, they're quite content to consolidate their backyard, and trade with the rest of the world (although they could pressure for a bigger slice of the EU economy). The US and Russia, definitely expansionists though.
17
Apprehensive-Bus5172 13 hr ago +14
I think you could describe China as near-expansionist - perhaps not in the literal conquering sense (though Taiwan and the South China Sea are of interest there ...) but they are keen to be the central power and regional hegemon (which I think you're already saying). I think there's probably a significant part of Russia, near them, that they would like to have a lot more influence over.
14
dattokyo 12 hr ago +13
> I don't think China has expansionist views You cannot be serious. China is literally, actively, drilling how to invade Taiwan, and is very public about it. Their latest idea is, apparently, to set up inspection of all ships entering Taiwans ports - just short of an active military blockade - to set the precedent for "Taiwan being China". China has spent decades stealing intellectual properties from Europe. China is the main economic lifeline of Russia, and supplies them with tech needed for their attacks on Ukraine. China is a supporter of Iran, and supplies them with both intel and tech. China is the only supporter of North Korea. China actively threatens, and has in fact upped their stance against, Taiwan - a firmly pro-western democracy. China killed the freedoms and western-alignment of Hong Kong in less than 12 months, including hiring thugs to beat up protesters. China has a long track record of jailing journalists and political dissidents. China runs ~~concentration camps~~"re-education through labor" camps. China had, and in some countries still has, unofficial hidden Chinese police stations in foreign countries, including in Europe, set up to bring back Chinese citizens (particularly those who fled China). The list goes on.
13
iuuznxr 13 hr ago +9
China just wanting to do trade is such a huge misconception. Literally the country where the emperor told the West "I don't need anything from you, I only sell you my stuff out of good-naturedness and that can stop anytime." With a market of 1 billion people at home any medium-sized country means nothing to them - that's why they want a weak EU. They frequently weaponize trade, Listnook just sleeps on that.
9
Novel_Second5151 12 hr ago +5
“Weaponized trade”, “debt trap”…all kinds of invented words to shit on China. What exactly did China do to deserve all this hate? Selling stuff to everyone including Russia and Ukraine? It’s a sovereign country and so why it must yield to Europe’s command to embargo Russia? Not to mention Europe itself never stopped buying from Russia. It’s just Europeans never see China as equal and all of sudden they realized, shit, am I the backwards society?
5
b3iAAoLZOH9Y265cujFh 8 hr ago +2
Consider it done. Let's move on to discussing what we're going to do about it.
2
mbaucco 7 hr ago +1
Really hoping we can do something about this in November.
1
DareDareCaro 17 hr ago +5
The real evil now is US.
5
triptip05 10 hr ago +4
All of Europe needs to unite. Unfortunately as a Brit my government is stupid.
4
investtherestpls 9 hr ago +2
Eh, Labour are doing what they can to get closer again. Ignore the bullshit headlines, basically by every metric Labour is doing really well.
2
RadiantIOrange5983 16 hr ago +4
Ukraine are handling Russia alone, which is a sign of strength from Europe. As for the other two, though it's unlikely that we will ever see large-scale conflict with them, they might make every move short of war to ruin Europe.
4
lightyourfire 15 hr ago +28
Well, Ukraine isn't entirely handling Russia *alone*, which kinda also is a point against Macron here
28
Sea_Pomegranate8229 12 hr ago +4
Correct. We have given the USA c$15Trillion since WW2 as a result of the petro-dollar and allowing them to retain the reserve currency. Have they said Thank You once, Have They?
4
WillingnessFun2907 11 hr ago +1
USA is anti earth nowadays it seems
1
nugentismycenter 10 hr ago +2
It's more they are more pro themselves, as are Europeans. Them and no other country has to cater to Europe just to placate them. Don't forget Europe dominated the world for close to a 1,000 years with no real concern about other people's needs or wants.
2
Icy-Scarcity 16 hr ago +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
Gangleri_Graybeard 10 hr ago +1
Wir haben nicht genügend Holz, my Lord.
1
← Back to Board