· 67 comments · Save ·
For Sale Mar 19, 2026 at 6:18 PM

Exclusive Interview: Nathan Fillion & Alan Tudyk Talk ‘Firefly’ Animated Series, If Shep Will Return & Why The Underdogs Deserve A Win

Posted by pepperbet1


https://deadline.com/2026/03/nathan-fillion-alan-tudyk-firefly-animated-series-interview-1236759356/

🚩 Report this post

67 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
RecommendsMalazan Mar 19, 2026 +86
This is very interesting to me, it sounds like Fillion and Tudyk are the ones responsible for bringing the show back in animated form. I wonder if that's every happened before, where the actor is the one leading the charge for a 'reboot'.
86
tarrsk Mar 19, 2026 +81
When they brought back Galaxy Quest, it seems like Nesmith and Co. were the main forces driving the reboot. It didn’t even seem like anyone had any interest in doing another series until the actors pulled that crazy spaceship crash stunt at the convention.
81
RecommendsMalazan Mar 19, 2026 +31
10/10 bit, but I didn't realize it at first and now I'm sad there isn't actually new Galaxy Quest coming. Kind of. I'm not sure I want any more without Rickman.
31
Ok-Seaworthiness4488 Mar 19, 2026 +24
By Grabthar's hammer he is sorely missed
24
Toby_O_Notoby Mar 20, 2026 +14
That's literally what stopped the new Galaxy Quest. They were all set to do it for Amazon and then Rickman died and no one felt good about doing it without him.
14
Nazori Mar 19, 2026 +5
Lol nice
5
untoldmillions Mar 19, 2026 +11
is zach braff an example?
11
RecommendsMalazan Mar 19, 2026 +6
Did he head up bringing Scrubs back? I thought that was more Bill Lawrence, despite him not actually being the showrunner.
6
DaveShadow Mar 19, 2026 +15
From what I've heard, Braff wasn't that interested in doing it until he did a rewatch podcast with Faison, and then got an itch to go back. Might not have "brought it back", but I'd imagine it was his decision to seek a return that actively pushed it forward.
15
Pardybro911 Mar 19, 2026 +8
That seems to be a bit of the lead in for a true push. Fillion and Tudyk started a podcast awhile back “Once We Were Spacemen” and it’s a bit Firefly centric. I think Fillion has always pined for it to come back in one way or another publicly, but right now it seems most of the cast would be available for at least some revival as well.
8
althanan Mar 20, 2026 +6
Doing it as an animated series helps a lot with that availability. Can be more flexible around other projects that way.
6
bretshitmanshart Mar 20, 2026 +4
The original also suffered because it was extremely expensive. Aside from the ship they don't generally have the same sets and a lot where filmed on location and with horses. Animation can let them do a lot more without having the problem of having the location
4
NachoNutritious Mar 19, 2026 +9
The main three guys on Trailer Park Boys bought the IP from the original series creator and brought it back themselves. Also reveals the downside of an actor-led revival, with them writing their own characters with no guidance from the old writer everyone immediately became flanderized.
9
Virtual-Nose7777 Mar 20, 2026 +5
Now one of them is in jail...not for bad writing though.
5
georgecm12 Mar 20, 2026 +3
Noah Wyle was the leading charge for an ER continuation (until the Crichton estate got involved and squashed that, leading to the creation of "The Pitt.")
3
Sanderf90 Mar 20, 2026 +2
Bryan Cranston pushed heavily for the Malcolm in the Middle reunion.
2
iste_bicors Mar 19, 2026 +5
It's not even the first time that's happened with a Whedon show in recent history. Sarah Michelle-Gellar was one of the main driving forces for the (now-canceled) Buffy reboot.
5
RecommendsMalazan Mar 19, 2026 +12
As far as I can tell it was Zhao who convinced SMG to be a part of it, so I'm not sure that really counts. This seems to be more driven by Fillion himself than him just being brought in.
12
iste_bicors Mar 19, 2026 -2
IIRC SMG was an EP from the start and Zhao convinced her to act as well.
-2
RecommendsMalazan Mar 19, 2026 +2
Could be, but EP as a title, to my understanding, doesn't really tell us much of anything about how involved she was. It doesn't seem like it was her production company that she founded that spearheaded bringing it back, like it apparently is here.
2
pepperbet1 Mar 19, 2026 +48
**Why there are no original writers involved** DEADLINE: When our story came out after the Awesome Con announcement, fans in the comments wondered why you didn’t hire any of the writers from the original series. What say you? FILLION: Running a show is an entirely different beast from recording a voice for a show. So there’s the original folks, like Tim Minear, who are running other TV shows. They don’t have a whole lot of time, and I don’t know that I could even afford them. This is not a big money-making venture, doing an animated program. But what we did manage to do is find incredibly talented people who also love Firefly. Tara and Marc met and connected over their love of Firefly. So when we were looking for showrunners, their passion was palpable for the show. We wanted to find someone who loved it and would care for it the way we do. **The choice of timeline** DEADLINE: What can you share about the timeline you chose, between the end of the TV show and before the film Serenity? TUDYK: It’s called the “Wash Is Still Alive Time.” We refer to it as that. FILLION: Exactly. You can’t bring back Firefly without bringing back all of Firefly. We toyed with the idea of spending some time in the show after the events of Serenity, and I honestly have no interest. I think Serenity was our wonderful farewell to what was an incredible opportunity. Had we only had one more chance to do something, that was it, and it was beautiful. I can’t compete with that. But what I can do is go back in time, bring the gang back together, and give people what they want, which is more Firefly. After Serenity, it’s not the same. I didn’t want to do this without my buddy Alan. **Shepherd Book** DEADLINE: So Shep will be represented in the animated series with a different voice? FILLION: Absolutely, that’s the plan. Yeah, we’re bringing back Shepherd Book for certain. Ron Glass, unfortunately, is not available. Ron once joked that he didn’t get a part when they were looking for a Ron Glass-type, and here we are again. We’re looking for a Ron Glass-type, and it’s not going to be Ron Glass. **Meetings with streamers/networks** DEADLINE: The millions of fans who liked and shared your viral videos leading up to the Awesome Con announcement have to mean something to potential buyers. Is there a dream home for Firefly, the animated series? Have you received a lot of calls yet? FILLION: I don’t care where it lives. I just want wherever it is for the people who are involved to either love it the way I love it or see the importance of what it is. TUDYK: Rosy wanted to know if there was a dream home for the project, but also whether or not there had been a flood of calls since our announcement became such a big hit. Are we just fielding offers? I…don’t…wanna say. I’ll leave this to you, Nathan. FILLION: I don’t think we’re having any difficulty getting the appointment now. You know what I mean? Our foot in the door. TUDYK: Conversations are being had. FILLION: Exactly. They don’t call me directly, Rosy. But I have a team of people who are far smarter than I, which is one of my strengths, recognizing my limitations and putting people in place who are smarter and better.
48
ContinuumGuy Mar 20, 2026 +18
> It’s called the “Wash Is Still Alive Time.” We refer to it as that. Alan Tudyk went to Julliard and MY GOD they are going to utilize him!
18
azeldatothepast Mar 19, 2026 +30
Host it on Dropout.
30
Flaming_Hot_Walrus Mar 19, 2026 +6
Hell, I'd watch it if they downloaded episodes onto Dropbox.
6
joseph4th Mar 21, 2026 +1
At this point, I’m pretty sure every actor has a story where they didn’t get a part that was looking a literally-them-type.
1
[deleted] Mar 19, 2026 -17
[deleted]
-17
Negafox Mar 19, 2026 +17
The actor died nearly a decade ago and this appears to be set before Serenity -- Book being missing would be odd
17
British_Commie Mar 19, 2026 +3
Book did leave the ship sometime between the show and movie, so it wouldn’t be particularly hard to write him out.
3
SovFist Mar 19, 2026 +2
Book wasn't part of the crew in serenity I thought, so my guess is they will address him leaving in this
2
nowhereman136 Mar 19, 2026 +6
I kind of want them to pick things up after the events of Serenity. It feels cleaner and more open. This would also mean that they can move forward without needing to replace Glass, since his character got a goodbye. The down side is Wash also got his leaf in the wind moment, so continuing there wouldn't include him either. Maybe Tudyk could voice a different, new character. How good of a voice actor is Tudyk, could he sound different and play someone besides Wash?
6
greendart Mar 19, 2026 +8
Tudyk is a phenomenal voice actor
8
Rico_Agave Mar 19, 2026 +4
"Phenomenal" is high praise and yet still an understatement.
4
ShitchesAintBit Mar 19, 2026 +7
> How good of a voice actor is Tudyk, could he sound different and play someone besides Wash? He went to Julliard.
7
dzsimbo Mar 19, 2026 +2
For the [uninitiated](https://youtu.be/FaGYXjMwS60?si=c6ng97Ygq-NP56Ar)
2
ilikechihuahuasdood Mar 19, 2026 +3
I’m okay with it, the animated show should be fun. I don’t want to see irreparably sad Zoe, and no Wash for comic relief wouldn’t feel right.
3
Wazula23 Mar 19, 2026 +20
Since it's animated they can just bring back Tudyk for voice work. He's got a million of em.
20
manny_b_hanz Mar 19, 2026 +13
[He went to Juiliard](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaGYXjMwS60)
13
IllystAnalyst Mar 19, 2026 +4
Wash juggles goslings that are voiced by Tudyk.
4
biophazer242 Mar 19, 2026 +3
Well we know he won't be voicing Book since he only gets voice work as an animal or robot :)
3
jeremysbrain Mar 19, 2026 +2
["Am I a Joke to you?"](https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/disney/images/9/97/Duke_of_Weselton_Frozen.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20170803102659)
2
Imaybetoooldforthis Mar 21, 2026 +1
Yes
1
krypter3 Mar 20, 2026 +1
It seems more like, he has no interesting in telling Serenitys' story after Serenity. It's the end of that. But I feel like if the animated pops off we'll get some form of live action spin off. Just not a new live action on Serenity.
1
qwasdcv Mar 19, 2026 +6
I wonder if this, and the Buffy almost-reboot, have to do with Whedon. Or more precisely, the lack of Whedon. It must’ve been well known that he was a nightmare to work with in recent years, so now that he’s persona non grata, and the dust has settled from his fall from grace, it’s looking like a great time to bring back these popular shows without having to deal with working with Joss.
6
kf97mopa Mar 20, 2026 +6
Well for Buffy, it is easy: Whedon doesn’t own Buffy, but he owns all the other characters in BtVS. You could only make a sequel if you got Whedon and the Kuzuis (who own the Buffy character) in a room and make them agree, and they’re not exactly friendly. The Kuzuis were involved in the Buffy reboot, and you will notice that it didn’t include anyone else from the show. They didn’t actually need Whedon’s approval to do it. They may have got it with an angle towards including those guys later on, but it wasn’t needed the way the supposed script was written. For Firefly… I wonder if Whedon isn’t in therapy and trying to better himself. He is infamously a control freak, but he was always friendly with the entire Firefly cast. This sounds like he is trusting some old friends with one of his old stories.
6
TVCasualtydotorg Mar 20, 2026 +3
Joss doesn't own the IP rights to Firefly. They asked for his blessing as a courtesy, but if he'd said no it would not have been enough to legally stop them.
3
qwasdcv Mar 20, 2026 +1
I didn’t mean in terms of ownership, more like, if they brought back one of these shows while he was still beloved by the fans, either they’d have to have him running the show, or the fans would’ve refused to watch if he wasn’t involved.
1
Curugon Mar 19, 2026 +2
Have they talked about the rights? I’m assuming Fox/Disney still owns them, or Mutant Enemy? I’m curious how this is all working.
2
ilikechihuahuasdood Mar 19, 2026 +12
Fillion said in the announcement they have permission to move forward. Whedon signed off so they don’t have to worry about any shenanigans with his creator rights. Fox/Disney also gave them permission to move forward.
12
pepperbet1 Mar 19, 2026 +6
20th Television (*formerly 20th Century Fox Television) owned the underlying rights. The show will be produced by 20th Television Animation. Mutant Enemy was Whedon's shingle. He's not involved so presumably ME would not be a named entity either, since Whedon is Mutant Enemy.
6
daiselol Mar 19, 2026 +10
Honestly this vindicates a lukewarm take of mine- the biggest hurdle to another season of Firefly (at least before Joss Whedon got cancelled) was actually Serenity They tried to burn through as much plot as possible and killed off a fan favorite character, when Firefly was at its best during its more episodic episodes that focus more on the characters and vibes Now they're shooting themselves in the foot trying to make a series that fills the gap between Firefly and Serenity, and we know that the characters won't meaningfully grow or change because they can't They should bite the bullet and just make Serenity not canon
10
NickofSantaCruz Mar 20, 2026 +5
>Now they're shooting themselves in the foot trying to make a series that fills the gap between Firefly and Serenity, and we know that the characters won't meaningfully grow or change because they can't I'll disagree with you here. The characters can still grow dynamically within that space of time between the last TV episode and *Serenity*, and we can retcon our view of each character's behavior in *Serenity* to have been influenced by events that will potentially be seen in the animated series. Within that, we have at least two big arcs in store: goings-on between Mal and Inara that lead to her retreat, and events leading Book off the ship and building Haven. Outside of the designated timeline, neither flashbacks nor flash-forwards were rule out; it's more likely we'll see the former than the latter, and instances of the latter can serve as a way to back-door pilot a live-action revival (that's not to say a flash-forward scene would be live-action, but that'd be pretty cool and catch everyone off-guard).
5
sulwen314 Mar 20, 2026 +2
I completely disagree that the characters can't meaningfully grow or change in that time frame. Look at the Clone Wars animated show. It takes place entirely between two Star Wars movies, so we knew exactly where everyone was heading, but they still told a beautiful and meaningful story in that space. Personally, I enjoy that show more than any of the Star Wars movies of that era. With excellent writing, anything is possible.
2
Piligrim555 Mar 19, 2026 +6
It's definitely not a popular opinion, but I always thought that Serenity was a very flawed movie. Like, sure, the "leaf in the wind" scene is beautiful, but as a whole, it doesn't really work. They rushed to the end, outright reversed half of the characters' development (especially with the doc) and left the series plot at a point where even 20 years later instead of continuation we get some filler-level mid-quel because no one wants to really progress the plot after that ending. Idk man, I kinda don't like Serenity.
6
loewe_a Mar 20, 2026 +10
In an ideal scenario, Firefly never gets cancelled and fills out 4-5 seasons of fun adventure with rising stakes as an overarching narrative organically develops. And Mal & Inara aren’t left in perpetuity as a lesson in yearning. Seriously f*** Fox. Anyways, they can cap off the series with a finale instead of a movie and one that doesn’t feel rushed. For all that I still think Serenity is a great film for the series. It’s just how things played out.
10
Sherringdom Mar 20, 2026 +3
> left the series plot at a point where even 20 years later instead of continuation we get some filler-level mid-quel because no one wants to really progress the plot after that ending. I don’t think that makes it flawed, just makes it a complete ending which is what the aim was after an early cancellation.
3
bretshitmanshart Mar 20, 2026 +3
I don't think it would make sense to do a continuation after Serenity. The story is done.
3
ColonelBy Mar 20, 2026 +2
> They should bite the bullet and just make Serenity not canon I agree, and I think it could be an important moment for fandoms in general if they did. Way too many people seem to treat continuity or canon as actual laws, but none of it is actually binding at all. "Now that we no longer have to end the story this way, we're not going to. You can still watch the film as a spectacle or a 'what-if' or something, but we're instead going to pick up where we left off and spend more time with this world and characters that we all love. Maybe things will turn out differently -- just another reason to watch and find out." This would be a totally respectable decision and I wish more storytellers would be willing to make it.
2
duogemstone Mar 20, 2026 +1
I've said it a few times since the announcement, if they get a few seasons they should just redo serenity as it was meant to be a full season stretch it out let it breath tweak a few things, trying to cram it all into 2 hours and having to shoehorn certain plot points just to make things fit (Mals 180 with Simon for example ) works for what it was but here's a chance to do it better. Dragonball super did it with Battle of gods and it was good
1
TheJoshider10 Mar 19, 2026 -2
Yeah I don't know why they don't just set the animated show in its own timeline so they can pick and choose bits to take and adapt but largely tell their own story unburdened by it. It's not like Firefly is this massive universe with dozens of movies and shows and seasons that all hold weight. It's a small season and one movie. They can do whatever the hell they want without any real backlash over a movie not being part of an animated show canon.
-2
biophazer242 Mar 19, 2026
Serenity will always exist but you can simply choose to ignore it. I think Nathan's comments about the movie are just him being diplomatic and not wanting to say anything negative about it. Probably not the best idea to talk negative about something when you are trying to get a project in the same universe off the ground. If the animated series gets made and it is popular it could turn into several seasons and that could result in lots of great stories for these characters. Just because one 'possible' future for the characters was shown in Serenity does not mean it needs to be the only future. Personally I rewatch the series about once a year but I think I have only watched Serenity maybe 3 times. I just do not get the same level of enjoyment from it as I do the series because of how it wraps up.
0
TheBSisReal Mar 19, 2026 -1
It’s not a bad idea, but at that point, why not just *start over with a totally new cast*?
-1
Go_Home_Jon Mar 20, 2026 +1
F*** Adam Baldwin. We didn't forget.
1
indierockspockears Mar 19, 2026 -9
I know this is an unpopular opinion but i don't like animated versions of live action stories. Love firefly, but i will definitely not watch this.
-9
NachoNutritious Mar 19, 2026 -7
It's always lame. The original actors either do clownish overacting with their vocal performances and sound like they're in a bad SNL skit (like literally any time a Star Trek actor guest starred on Lower Decks) or the animation is too stiff and wooden and does the characters a disservice (like the Babylon 5 reunion movie)
-7
TheMythofKoalas Mar 20, 2026
The Scott Pilgrim one was pretty well done (aside, perhaps, from Scott himself, the others did a great job and the animation was stellar).
0
Accomplished-Run221 Mar 20, 2026
Can we hope for pog form, like ALF?
0
anagoge Mar 20, 2026 -7
Immensely disappointed with how they played this. They hyped it up as something that was already in the bag. In effect it's nothing more than "Yeah nothing is filmed and we have no one to pick it up". They should have stayed quiet until they had something to be hyped about.
-7
← Back to Board