· 19 comments · Save ·
For Sale Mar 28, 2026 at 5:47 PM

Favorite Rating Systems

Posted by DontUnderDoIt


I'm not a big fan of the 5 star rating system and I was wondering if I am alone in that category. What do you guys prefer? 5 Star (Letterboxd) | 1-10 (IMDB) | 1-100 (RT) | Granular Avg. (Story/Acting/Writing/Concept)

🚩 Report this post

19 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
AnonymousTimewaster Mar 28, 2026 +3
Thumbs up or thumbs down is good enough for me.
3
tysuave0 Mar 28, 2026 +1
I like the simplicity of letterboxd 5 stars. The possibility of ratings are smaller so it easily tells me how most people (that have common sense) view a film.
1
Key_Custard_9756 Mar 28, 2026 +1
I prefer it when it’s just “reccomend, do not reccomend, must watch, mixed opinion.” I don’t value any ordinal ranking that’s just an avg of multiple people, be it select critics or popular vote
1
Im-A-Tomato-1744 Mar 28, 2026 +1
I prefer defined ratings e.g. "great, good, meh, bad, awful". The more specific the options, the more "accurate" the overall rating because of the discrepancy between what people view each rating as. Different people will score 3/5 as meaning "bad" "meh" "good enough" or "really good but not great (4/5) or outstanding (5/5)". Scoring out of 10 allows for more nuance, but puts more pressure on people so 5 is more common - it's much easier to say if you think something was a 4 v 5, or good v great, than put a number out of 10 on it.
1
ubermadface Mar 28, 2026 +1
IIRC, there was a study that states the average viewer doesn't really understand how to correctly utilize any ranking system beyond "like/dislike." Most people just say [minimum] or [maximum], which defeats the entire purpose of an x/y system. That said, I wish Netflix would go back to a 5-star system and that IMDB had a granular x/10 system.
1
HorizontalBob Mar 28, 2026 +1
Do you like a 5 star rating or 10 star rating in disguise as a 5 star?
1
DontUnderDoIt Mar 28, 2026 +1
Hahah, well said
1
Pterodactyl_midnight Mar 28, 2026 +1
I like rotten tomatoes. Critic score tells me how well made it is. Audience score tells me how entertaining it is.
1
Comic_Book_Reader Mar 28, 2026 +1
1-6.
1
Dillweed999 Mar 28, 2026 +1
"Yeah" "Meh" "Nah"
1
urgasmic Mar 28, 2026 +1
i think 4 stars. bad, mediocre, good, must watch.
1
Im-A-Tomato-1744 Mar 28, 2026 +2
I'd like a fifth option for "forgettable" please! For films that are just meh... not "bad" but you won't remember it in a weeks time.
2
EnoughWear3873 Mar 28, 2026
Yes 4 stars is the superior rating system, as demonstrated by Ebert and many print publications. 
0
AcanthisittaIcy6482 Mar 28, 2026 +1
I'm with you on the 5 star thing - feels too limiting when you've got something that's like a 6.5/10 but doesn't quite deserve 4 stars. The 1-10 scale just gives you more room to work with those middle-ground movies that aren't terrible but aren't great either.
1
CMDR_omnicognate Mar 28, 2026
1-10 and 1-100 are the same if you include fractions on the 1-10, which most lists do. For example a 7.2 is the same as 72/100, they’re the same.
0
[deleted] Mar 28, 2026
[deleted]
0
Im-A-Tomato-1744 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Actually it does make a difference. Rating out of 10 gives more nuanced and accurate results, but people find fewer options to be easier & quicker. And there's also the situation where some people use 5/5 as "enjoyed it" but to others its reserved for "outstanding" once-in-a-generation films. Allowing rating out of 10 minimises these discrepancies within the same rating. And offering actual words (e.g. bad, good, great etc.) is easier again for most users.
1
[deleted] Mar 28, 2026 +1
[deleted]
1
Im-A-Tomato-1744 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Hey, don't argue with me, argue with all the research that's been done on this before. It's is a common topic in businesses who use grading, and that is a summary of the general understanding in the industry.
1
← Back to Board