Conan basing his opening Oscars skit around *Weapons* was finally enough to make me sit down and make time to watch it, and boy, am I glad I did.
**SPOILERS FOLLOW**
There has been a lot of discussion on this sub lately about films that take a hard right turn on their genre about halfway through the movie, largely thanks to *Sinners* also appearing this past year. While it's horror through and through, I feel that *Weapons* opening exposition makes you feel like this is a crime movie, or a government conspiracy film, or maybe zombies even? But no: it's a witch. A genuine, and \*really\* mean witch.
And the film even winks and nods at us a couple of times to our own obliviousness. Including giving the twist away early when Archer literally writes "WITCH" on Justine's car. (the second being the assault rifle with "2:17" on the ammo counter – a literal weapon – in Archer's dream).
Amy Madigan's performance ranges from quirky and weird to utterly bone-chilling. The Oscar is so well-deserved.
There has been a lot – so, SO much – in fiction in the past several decades about nice witches; witches as a metaphor for female empowerment. That has good utility: as a lot of the legends about witches were probably tools used to keep women under control and in line. But it's also left me thirsting for a truly evil, outright sociopathic witch character; something I didn't realize until just now.
It's offset by Justine. Who, despite her (deep) flaws, is in fact the one person who cares about Alex. As someone in one of the older threads pointed out, if anyone had just listened to her early on, the case would have been cracked open much earlier. As the child narrator says, law enforcement failed embarrassingly. Nevertheless, Justine's care for Alex – as seen in the flashbacks – is genuine, and pure.
Alex is great. Him collecting all the student-made cubby nametags, with the handwritten name and art, is such a genius way of fulfilling Gladys' request all in one go. And in the end, understanding her methods by being attentive, he is the one who beats her at her own game.
Again, another listnookor described Glady's **forcible dismemberment** as one of the most satisfying villain deaths they'd seen in years, and I couldn't agree more. Her terror when she hears the unearthly DING of Alex retargeting the weapon kids against her was delightful: "OH NO." I think satisfying endings are important, even if they aren't happy or don't explain everything. *Weapons* nailed it.
That's it! What did you think?
I never thought a movie could make me laugh while a gang of children chase down and rip a senior citizen to shreds, but here we are. The moment when Brolin's character calls to his son, and the kid turns to face him was such a massive relief.
914
whatsinthesocksMar 23, 2026
+233
Right, up until they tear her apart it honestly felt like it could have been a WKYK sketch.
233
sweetdawg99Mar 23, 2026
+89
I love that Cregger had a nod to WKYK in the movie.
89
i_should_be_codingMar 23, 2026
+94
I was really sad the junkie's tent or campsite didn't have a gallon jug with PCP written on it.
94
ScramItVancityMar 23, 2026
+39
The actor who played him felt like he was channeling the late local sexpot Trevor Moore.
39
ContrarianDouchebagMar 23, 2026
+21
What was the nod?
21
sweetdawg99Mar 23, 2026
+120
The principal and his significant other sitting down for a meal and there's a tray the one dude is carrying with 7 hot dogs on it, which is a nod to a famous skit of theirs called Hot Dog Timmy.
120
saalsa_sharkMar 23, 2026
+57
It's just 7 hot dogs. Not like that's a lot, right?
57
sweetdawg99Mar 23, 2026
+41
Are there any more hot dogs? Because we're at 7 right now, and it's only lunch.
41
ContrarianDouchebagMar 23, 2026
+19
Holy shit. I know that skit and didn't make that connection! Love it even more.
19
ArchDuckyMar 23, 2026
+18
[Heres the skit](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRh91b74zTU)
BTW, this skit is about alcoholism they just changed "drink" with "hot dog".
18
matdragonMar 23, 2026
+6
... I never knew about that and I watched this when it came out way long ago
6
UnreliableNarr8orMar 23, 2026
+3
I can't point to the exact one, but he said in an interview that that wasn't intended as a WKUK nod.
3
sweetdawg99Mar 23, 2026
+2
Let me have this.
2
KingOfAwesometoniaMar 24, 2026
+1
I think it was a Letterbox one? But yeah he was saying how it wasn't a lot of hot dogs because the principal and his husband are eating like three each.
Though I do think it looks like a comical amount
1
Diocletians-ScepterMar 23, 2026
+7
Hot dogs
7
GemerilMar 23, 2026
+7
The hotdog platter.
7
Mellowman9Mar 23, 2026
+9
What’s WKYK?
9
Lundus_MaximusMar 23, 2026
+19
Whitest Kids You Know
19
Mellowman9Mar 23, 2026
+2
Thanks
2
Flatlander81Mar 23, 2026
+30
Whitest Kids U Know a comedy sketch group that Cregger was a member of in the 2000s and 2010s. Hot Dog Timmy was a sketch where Timmy, a husky man child,was being interviewed about his hot dog eating habits by his doctor and learned that Timmy typically ate at least 7 hot dogs by lunchtime.
30
Stoneheaded76Mar 23, 2026
+5
Husky man child…. Yeah that is Timmy haha
5
Mellowman9Mar 23, 2026
+1
Thanks a lot
1
BlandSandHamwichMar 23, 2026
+11
Whitest kids you know. Great sketch comedy show.
11
Mellowman9Mar 23, 2026
+1
Thanks
1
i_should_be_codingMar 23, 2026
+21
I dunno, man. The part where they switched to the pov of the one girl in the lead was so visceral. I can watch that all day.
21
RuRhPdOsIrPtMar 23, 2026
+19
“Now you fucked up! You have fucked up now!”
19
SurlyVladMar 23, 2026
+3
Don't drink boners; I'm begging you!
3
GarretBarrettMar 23, 2026
+28
Zach Cregger made a good point on a podcast I listened to. Timing is incredibly important in **both** comedy and horror.
That, I think, is why we’re seeing these incredible sketch comedy guys transition over to horror and have immediate impact on the genre. At a glance it seems so different, but the things the genres have in common are so important to actually pulling it off well.
He’s a funny b****** and only a very funny b****** can make me laugh out loud as a little old lady runs in panicked terror from a group of small children and then screams as she is ripped to pieces. 10/10. Best scene in a movie that I’ve seen in ages.
28
yomamaeatsyellowsnowMar 23, 2026
+8
Watched it in a full theater and the entire audience was dying laughing. One of the best movie theater experiences I've had in a while, actually.
8
sightlabMar 23, 2026
+8
Same...packed theater that was on the f****** edge when it was suspenseful, absolutely howled when it's funny. Laughing at a movie in a big room full of people is a major reason I dont want movie theaters to die.
8
Funny2WhoMar 23, 2026
+5
I was crying laughing but in a different way. Like it wasn't so hilarious I cried, but I was crying at the cinematic achievement of having a bunch of kids doing stunts while laughing of the absurdity of it as well. It was a weird interesting feeling.
5
not_thrilledMar 23, 2026
+2
I really wanted that scene to go full Point Break and Gladys throw a dog at the kids.
2
30_Fine_years_oldMar 24, 2026
+2
[“Here’s Mommy”](https://imgflip.com/i/anesbi)
2
egoshoppeMar 23, 2026
+1
I just couldn't get over the absurdity of these kids running through walls like the Kool Aid Man. Running straight through windows, glass doors, wooden framing with nails. These kids would be seriously hurt and barely walking after the first house.
1
mintakaxMar 23, 2026
+245
I originally saw it in the theaters and watched it for the third time last night. I thought it was OK the first time, but for some reason I enjoyed it more over each subsequent viewing.
245
WholeWheelof_cheeseMar 23, 2026
+52
Honestly that’s what I think makes a great movie, with rewatch it becomes better.
52
CasanovaJones82Mar 23, 2026
+8
I agree, and it's similar with a lot of different art. Music and literature being two of the most obvious parallels. A novel you first read as a teenager can feel like a completely different story when read at 40, and a song can hit differently depending on your emotional state at whatever random moment.
As a personal example, there's a book called The Talisman that I loved when I was younger and I recently re-read it, and it destroyed me. It impacted me in a completely different way than I remembered. Same story, same words, completely different takeaway.
8
fkadkMar 23, 2026
+34
Same experience. I enjoyed it much more on a second watch.
34
CutieSoft_Mar 23, 2026
+3
I love when that happens. The first time it’s ‘okay,’ then suddenly you start noticing the details.
3
NOTcreative-Mar 23, 2026
+6
Yeah I mentioned I thought it was okay in an oscars post and got down votes like crazy. Haven't given it a second let alone third yet
6
captainalphabetMar 23, 2026
+2
How was that ending with a crowd for the first time?
2
mintakaxMar 23, 2026
+2
It was in the afternoon and there were maybe 6 people in the theater LOL
2
SexyHalo_Mar 23, 2026
+1
Same! I had one of those ‘first watch was fine, then it got better’ situations too.
1
zuuzuuMar 23, 2026
+262
The scene where Justine falls asleep in the car was so creepy and scary I stopped watching and made my son watch it with me. That was really the only truly terrifying scene for me, but I scare easy so there was no way I was watching it alone after that, lol.
As soon as the credits rolled my son went "What the f***, Zach Cregger?!?" It's such a good movie, and it's just as good on re-watch.
262
QuantumFelineMar 23, 2026
+93
Ugh that scene. The anticipation of the opening door and the darkness beyond, the creepy way the woman staggers out and you know Justine is asleep and won't react, the arm reaching in from the back seat!!! Chills even now remembering it.
93
cupholderyMar 24, 2026
+2
The mom walking out and the whole sequence of hearing but not seeing her enter the car. Woof!
2
IhamAmericanMar 23, 2026
+72
That and the junkie going through the house were the only times I was truly on edge. Definitely tense at other times but holy f*** watching those scissors come out of the dark was bone chilling
72
Dbtc1991Mar 23, 2026
+20
Yet both scenes walked the tightrope between terrifying and humorous. Really well done.
20
earlofcheddarMar 24, 2026
+1
Oh, f***. Willow.
1
moon-twigMar 23, 2026
+30
At my theatre, they were doing $8 tickets so the place was packed. My session for Weapons was right after the local high school ended for the day. In the other corner, there was a few high schoolers talking, but I couldn’t really hear it so it didn’t both me.
During that scene, that long silence, just before they cut Justine’s hair, someone in the theatre screamed at the top of their lungs: “SHUT THE F*** UUUUUP!!”
Can’t blame them. Turned the scariest scene into one of the funniest for me.
30
dotnetmonkeMar 23, 2026
+8
Man, when some friends and I went we had what I would say was an active audience in a fairly small theater - lots of laughs, "what the f***!"s, some jokes, and it was an absolute blast. I think the important part about it was that it went dead quiet during some of those tense scenes, like the scissors or the dream scene.
8
UnreliableNarr8orMar 23, 2026
+3
Someone did that in a theater I was in one time and I wanted to buy the guy a beer for being such a hero.
The interaction went something like this:
Angry Man: "SHUT THE F*** UP!"
Talking Man: "Excuse me!? I'm going to tell the manager-"
Angry Man: "SHUT. THE. F***. UUUUP!" (significantly louder and with way more aggression)
The guy did in fact shut the f*** up after that. It was so satisfying.
3
MadMads23Mar 23, 2026
+14
Watching that scene in the theatre was a FANTASTIC experience. It was so quiet, you could hear a pin drop. Then you hear the door click open, and we all went, *Oooooooohh* in fear!
14
XaroinMar 23, 2026
+6
I saw Barbarian before this and that was one of the most fantastically paced and fucked up horror films I have seen in a long while, so that’s what made me want to see this next one. Love his style. His experience in comedy shows with his horror films because he knows how to pace setup and payoff like a comedian can pace a set up and punchline.
6
Finnegan789Mar 23, 2026
+102
Great review! I had the pleasure of watching Weapons in the theatre- everyone was screaming and hootin’ and hollering’ and it made it so much fun. Loved the film
102
souleman96Mar 23, 2026
+27
Nothing better than a crowd pleaser with a crowd. I have heard Hail Mary has been having the same effect lately.
27
itstheHattyMar 23, 2026
+9
Can confirm, saw it in 70mm IMAX and the crowd was having a blast!
9
SouthernbeekeeperMar 23, 2026
-1
Your joking? That sounds like hell. If people were cheering at the cinema I'd be livid.
-1
RequiemEternalMar 23, 2026
+11
My biggest issue with the film is that I feel it uses the non-linear structure to conceal the fact that the story is much more thin than it first appears. By presenting it this way it obfuscates some of the bigger logical questions and introduces a couple of plot threads that are ultimately a waste of time. The cop and the drug addict segments, while entertaining, add nothing substantial to the story, and themselves contain subplots that get dropped when those characters become irrelevant.
I also don’t think the film’s subtext is anywhere near developed enough to have been worth including. The gun in the dream (which it makes little sense for this character to even be having a prophetic dream) feels more like an attempt to introduce some Twin Peaks-style mysticism that vaguely gestures at a theme of gun violence but has nothing to actually say about it afterward.
It’s a relatively decent movie but I think it wasn’t anywhere near as coherent and tightly written as I was expecting based on the reactions.
11
sunlitstrangerMar 23, 2026
+1
Surely there’s something there with the cop and the addict. Something like the cop being a piece of shit, worrying about his job so much he’s gonna kill a guy instead of letting him go to the police station not knowing it was to report the missing kids, and further more going inside alone instead of reporting it, likely to reap the reward money, gets him killed when the all of former options probably would’ve solidified keeping his job, his life, and saved everyone. And how a lowlife junkie committing a crime is the only one to find the children. Something something society. I only just saw it but yeah this is a very quick write up I’m sure it could be explored deeper
1
Iron_Mike0Mar 24, 2026
I agree, I was disappointed with how the film ultimately tied up (or didn't) the various plot points. It felt like there were some bits they came up with and then shoehorned them into the story going for a Pulp Fiction style of intertwined characters. But it didn't full land.
The gun in the dream as you mentioned never had any purpose other than being an on the nose reference to the movie being a metaphor/allegory of a school shooting.
The cop and the teacher hooking up had no significance other than being a reason to connect the storylines of the two. The cops wife and connection to the chief also seemed unnecessary and didn't really do anything for the plot.
The drug dealer and cop storylines were funny and interesting on their own but ultimately didn't advance the main story other than finding the house with the kids (which didn't even matter because the kids dad found it independently). This contributed to the movie being a little too long in my opinion.
Overall it was a decent movie but had some big enough flaws to keep it from being a great movie.
0
Robrulesall2Mar 23, 2026
+133
Just watched it a few days ago myself and honestly i enjoyed it but i expected more from it. I will say i agree that having that ending was great and appreciated. Sometimes horror movies get unsatisfying endings and it hurts the overall presentation.
133
Lieutenant_SeagullMar 23, 2026
+31
Ya this was me haha. I had not been more excited for a movie in a while because I love Julia Garner and horror, and the premise seemed great. But then I felt like the creepiness went away so early, and then the resolution was just a letdown. I still enjoyed the movie and the ending had me laughing, but it just wasn't the movie I wanted it to be.
I know it's the same director so it makes sense, but Barbarian was the exact same thing for me. Great premise, great buildup, total change up at the end that just wasn't what I wanted
31
FatalFirecrotchMar 23, 2026
+7
The middle of movie just dragged on way to much for me.
7
Affectionate_Owl_619Mar 23, 2026
+13
They actually changed the ending bc test audiences hated how unsatisfying the original was lol
13
inv4alfonsoMar 23, 2026
+13
You might be mixing movies up because the ending was the same as in the script.
13
Affectionate_Owl_619Mar 23, 2026
+37
According to Cregger, the original version of Weapons had a slight difference. The final film ends with the return of the voiceover from the beginning of the movie, with the child explaining the aftermath of Gladys' death. It's said that those who were under Gladys' spell still can't speak, although they are slowly improving.
However, Cregger's original ending didn't have this voiceover. Instead, the scenes shown in the final film played out with no explanation, ending with the ominous shot of Matthew staring into the camera. The director explained:
Originally, that voiceover that comes in at the end wasn’t even in there. I was not really into that idea. I wanted to just end it on [Matthew’s] look. But people were not stoked on that.
There was no voiceover, and we just ended on the kid’s face. The lights went out and ‘Written and directed by Zach Cregger’ came up, and a woman in the theater goes, ‘What the f*ck?’
37
geekmansworldMar 23, 2026
+28
That's a small change but needed. I've long been fed up on Darkly Ironic Unhappy Endings in fiction, particularly horror (like, almost *always* in horror). Obviously in *Weapons* a lot of people are dead and supremely fucked up, but at least the villain gets what's coming and the victims have a chance to heal.
I think people need that today a lot more than creators, or even many people, realize.
28
HerbaciousTeaMar 23, 2026
+14
Dark endings aren't the problem so much as endings without any form of closure or denouement at all, dark or not. Horror movies are especially bad about this because there are some times when the suspenseful non-ending, the hard cut to leave the audience imagining, really does work, but it works in a very narrow situation where it's been built up to work.
Otherwise, people reasonably expect that they will get to actually... *know* how the various plot threads of the movie wrap up.
14
pigeonwiggleMar 23, 2026
+1
darkly ironic unhappy endings are the best.
midsommer's my favourite of the bunch.
if that had had some narrative unspooling over top i'd have walked out (during the credits)
1
inv4alfonsoMar 23, 2026
+7
I see what you mean now, I wasn't considering the voiceover, just the overall scene.
7
STFUNeckbeardMar 23, 2026
-1
Dude is thinking of I am Legend
-1
Chessh2036Mar 23, 2026
+3
What was the original ending?
3
Affectionate_Owl_619Mar 23, 2026
+17
The original ending didn’t have the voiceover explanation that the kids are getting better. It was just the slow zoom into the kid’s face
17
DamonDDMar 23, 2026
-11
The supposedly original ending is that Justine found out how to use the witch branch and collect samples from others to make her own "zombies" and her zombies will fight Gladys zombies in an all out war.
Through the way, I think the director/writer felts its too ridiculous so they change it to what we have now
-11
komrade23Mar 23, 2026
+12
Source for this? It's not in the screenplay at all.
12
DamonDDMar 23, 2026
+3
https://youtube.com/shorts/ch5Ee9U8fco?si=11YZke02Q4757ZWf
Interview of the director
3
komrade23Mar 23, 2026
+3
Ah ok so this was an ending he was considering writing, not one that was filmed that test audiences hated, which is what we were talking about.
3
DamonDDMar 23, 2026
+2
Oh, I was replying to comment on Original Ending which I got from the director/writer interview. Did OP edit out test audience part? Must have missed that, my bad
2
komrade23Mar 23, 2026
+1
This is the parent comment we are commenting off of.
[https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1s12ijo/comment/obxunrc/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web3x&utm\_name=web3xcss&utm\_term=1&utm\_content=share\_button](https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1s12ijo/comment/obxunrc/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button)
1
NilsFanckMar 23, 2026
+1
I saw this and bring her back in one sitting an the latter is just so, so much better
1
fondue4killMar 23, 2026
+1
Oh completely agree. Like I was nervous about it based on some other weird movies where the twist comes and it’s dumb as f***. “The Knowing” is a great example with a good premise but then they ruin it by making it about >! aliens !< at the end and I was worried Weapons would fall into the same trap.
1
AlexexyMar 23, 2026
+60
I would say that Weapons is a great movie but any expectations I had were tempered by how great Barbarian (by the same director) was.
If you like Weapons, also check out Barbarian. If you like this genre of horror/comedy, also check out Companion, They Cloned Tyrone, and Sorry to Bother You.
60
Randyd718Mar 23, 2026
+48
I liked weapons better 🤷🏼♀️
48
wotownMar 23, 2026
+30
Weapons finishes way stronger and the one day with multiple POVs is executed perfectly. Barbarian did do a little bit of it first though. You can see Zach Cregger innovating and improving his style with each movie
30
VonMillersThighsMar 23, 2026
+12
Same, Barbarian was fantastic until the last like 10-15 minutes. The entire sequence on top of the water tower was just ridiculous.
12
Alpha_LemurMar 23, 2026
+1
agreed, completely lost me at the end.
1
CaptainPlebMar 23, 2026
+1
Same, Barbian got way too cheesy at the end.
1
QuixoticishMar 23, 2026
I loved Barbarian, hated Weapons.
0
ignoresubsMar 23, 2026
+1
Interesting how polarizing they were for you. What about Weapons did you hate?
1
QuixoticishMar 23, 2026
+3
Barbarians felt fun, quirky, and took a few interesting turns in ways I didn't expect. Weapons felt a lot more "paint by numbers" for want of a better word, it was definitely more polished but nothing came as a surprise and once we hit the half way point it really started to drag for me.
3
sundeighMar 23, 2026
This, Weapons was formulaic while Barbarian was a wildcard
0
leopard_tightsMar 23, 2026
-13
I think both are terribly mid and he doesn't know how to wrap things up. In Barbarian the climax is that the monster is a super strong old woman so like... ok I guess. I don't think whatever came before is great, even if seeing Justin Long measure the basement was funny. And in weapons you see the granny for the first time and you know she's a witch before she does anything really and that's it, the rest of the movie is pointless because the movie runs its course as predictably as possible.
I'm not a picky watcher, but maybe horror fans just have a lower bar than me or something, I mean I do enjoy some horror so it's not like it's not for me. But for example of Aster's movies the only great thing he's done in my opinion is the first half of Beau, which is just astronomically good.
-13
o_MrBombastic_oMar 23, 2026
+14
I'm glad I saw it after the Oscar's and Conan O'brians opening i belly laughed at the ending it was still so damn satisfying
14
Killahdanks1Mar 23, 2026
+7
I like your take. When he turned it on her, to know that she had done that to so many people and she knew it was over for her. Epic. I audibly laughed and enjoyed her death.
7
RazThePunisherMar 23, 2026
+15
It was alright. I liked the early parts of the film more than the later portion.
15
moconahaftmereMar 23, 2026
+13
I really liked the film, but feel like I'm in the minority of people who thought the ending was super weak. Very unsatisfying and tonally out of place. Exact same issue his previous film Barbarian had.
13
NiceColdPintMar 23, 2026
+2
I didn’t particularly appreciate the tone shift with the kids chasing the witch. As you say, that part felt quite out of place.
2
NiceColdPintMar 23, 2026
+5
I was really loving it up until the portion covering Alex. I felt it dragged far too long and probably over-explained things, more like a delaying tactic to avoid the end of the film.
And the final few scenes were good until the complete comical shift where the kids were chasing the witch. Totally undercuts any horror aspect unfortunately.
5
buttercupcapncrunchMar 23, 2026
+6
I too watched it because Conan used it in his Oscars cold open! I don't normally watch horror (think conjuring, exorcist, etc). Ive been traumatised by chuckie the doll as a kid 😩
Anyway! I watched Weapons after seeing the oscars. Loved the movie. I laughed way too much when Josh Brolin's character yelled "WHAT THE F***" to himself, after waking up from his dream/nightmare.
6
kickerofelves86Mar 23, 2026
+4
Madigan rightfully got a lot of attention but Julia Garner and Alden Ehrenreich were also excellent
4
Wazula23Mar 23, 2026
+26
I didn't love it but I know I'm in the minority. Maybe his Resident Evil movie will do better for me.
26
DukeRaoul123Mar 23, 2026
+14
It was aight. Didn't think it was worth the hype, but a solid thriller/horror.
14
longjumpingtoteMar 23, 2026
+15
A lot of people didn’t love it. It was a good set up but then there really wasn’t a payoff that equal the set up. It was a fun matinee popcorn flick.
15
ElectricalDark8280Mar 23, 2026
-10
You nailed it. Great development with no payoff
-10
ElectricalDark8280Mar 23, 2026
+3
This movie was rough. I did not enjoy it.
3
Wazula23Mar 23, 2026
The ending monologue contradicts the beginning. There's a lot of little stuff like that.
0
Federico216Mar 23, 2026
-1
I think you have to really love jumpscares to like this movie.
-1
realscholarofficialMar 23, 2026
+10
I think a more serious ending would've been an appropriate tonal fit for the movie, and felt the shift into comedy was a bit of a cop out.
10
SwiftCaseMar 23, 2026
+19
It was alright. I didn't like that it created an interesting mystery and it was just a witch. It's like writing any crazy thing you want, because you know it's just going to all be a dream in the end.
19
HumerousMonikerMar 23, 2026
+6
I mostly disagree, there has to be a premise and it doesn’t have to be rooted in reality, but they really tossed out the ‘horror’ aspect for ‘Naruto running comedy mystery’ too soon. And I think the movie suffers for it, that it didn’t get the space to ratchet up the tension, so the ‘just a witch’ feels underwhelming.
6
SalukiKnightXMar 23, 2026
+3
I caught it in theaters and really wasn’t feeling it until the reveal of Aunt Gladys. She frighteningly reminded me of a couple of the clients I had as a caregiver (minus the witchcraft). Anyway, once her malevolence and the crazy kicked in, movie had me locked in.
I’m scared to revisit it due to the slow start.
3
mommytyresMar 23, 2026
+3
My experience is the exact opposite. I was hooked on it for the first half. It was mysterious, it felt like it was giving me clues but not enough to solve it, I was so excited to see what the twist was. And then it was just a witch. The air all came out of the balloon at once for me at that point. Like a magician revealing how their trick was done, I was no longer entertained.
I’m glad other people enjoyed it, but for me there really is no larger message here. And I can’t imagine wanting to ever consume it again knowing how the sausage is made. To each their own!
3
SalukiKnightXMar 24, 2026
+1
The heightened reality in the first half from the tragedy ribbons, the rally against the teacher, affair and alcoholism definitely brought me down only because it was too relatable in an unreal circumstance (the kids running from their homes at 2:17 Naruto style). That already felt off.
I get the mystery as a driving factor and the reality of the setup as necessary for the crazy to take off, but for my own film watching, it’s probably the most necessary but also my least liked aspect of a film. Unless there’s something else that keeps my attention whether a driving score, a likable charismatic lead or something else that garners attention outside of the inciting incident to keep interest in those early moments. Drama for drama’s sake is basically a play in a 3D environment and personally uninteresting to me unless it implements film format in its entirety.
1
SquirrelMoney8389Mar 23, 2026
+7
You summed up everything I love about the film. Well said.
Glad I saw it with an audience. One of my favourite times at the movies in recent times.
7
cerberus00Mar 23, 2026
+7
I thought it was good until they revealed that it's just a "scary lady witch" trope which turned me off a bit. The end where the kids turn on her was good though, but other than that I was kinda annoyed.
7
BananaCuchoMar 23, 2026
+8
Best chase scene ever. I was dying
8
py87Mar 23, 2026
+8
I watched it on a flight a few months ago and thought it was decent, never did I expect it to associated with the Oscars at all
8
richnissMar 23, 2026
+7
Great movie, I did half expect that the end would be the witch who was the one that was the child who began the narration. Having consumed so many souls she is now herself a child again. Her getting mauled by the kidnapped children was a much more satisfying end.
7
BraveTanakaMar 23, 2026
+2
One of the highlights of my watch was the tension built up from the utter darkness from Alex's front door.. and then the slow hobble of his mom, followed by the OPENING of the unlocked car door. What a way to crystallize a real-world fear lol
2
pastel_nebulapetal_2Mar 23, 2026
+2
liked it overall, but I think it’s one of those movies where your enjoyment really depends on how you feel about the twist
2
Hey_Giant_LoserMar 23, 2026
+2
I don't like the characterization of Justine as someone who's deeply flawed.
2
kidcrumbMar 23, 2026
+2
This movie has such a good creep towards absurdity. It starts out as kind of a thriller, and slowly goes more and more into horror with the car scene being genuinely terrifying.
Then I kind of laughed when Josh Brokin was having his dream because in my head I said "what the f***?" When the gun was over the house, and Josh Brolin wakes up and says the exact same thing I was thinking "what the f***."
It was at that moment I asked myself...is this a comedy? The tone seems kind of all over the place. Is this supposed to be kind of funny?
Yes. Yes it was.
2
ranban2012Mar 23, 2026
+2
the core plot was a straight reproduction of ancient misogynist witch mythology. Not a subversion, a reproduction.
Everything else about it was well done and impressive. But the root of the movie plot was the least impressive part.
2
30_Fine_years_oldMar 24, 2026
+2
[“Here’s Mommy”](https://imgflip.com/i/anesbi)
2
FeefaitMar 23, 2026
+18
I felt it was more idea and promise than actual substance. It's a very overhyped movie that couldn't quite pull it together. It's like Barbarian, unsurprisingly. Some of it was so good, but too much was silly, and the end absolutely sucked.
18
cameraspeedingMar 23, 2026
+11
I think the problem is people want to read into it when it’s really just a witch story. Any relation to deeper themes is merely window dressing
11
psychonikMar 23, 2026
+6
It actually has a lot to do with alcoholism.
6
FeefaitMar 23, 2026
+5
Every year in school (I teach middle school) we talk about the leucochloridium paradoxum, a parasitic worm that turns slugs into zombies. It was featured in the movie and I was excited that they might do something with it... but they didn't really do much with it. :( [](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leucochloridium_paradoxum)
5
DatcheryMar 23, 2026
+15
Gladys is the parasite though. It’s a metaphor for the witch.
15
FeefaitMar 23, 2026
+4
I get it. I'm saying that's the most basic thing they could have done with it. I'm glad people like it. It just wasn't what I was hoping for. I wanted more mystery and suspense, but the mystery was solved pretty easily.
4
VenusBlueMar 23, 2026
+6
I didn't think it deserved as much hype as it got. The writing was sloppy, Brolin was too much, and wasn't a fan of the looney toons ending.
6
pancyfantzMar 23, 2026
+4
I enjoyed it but will forever feel robbed of a better ending where all the kids come back to their normal consciousness in the midst of murdering Gladys and we got to see the full gamut of emotions kids would naturally experience when waking up to themselves covered in blood actively killing someone. But instead they all became mute zombies who may or may not have started to speak again someday??? How. Boring.
4
therealmintoncardMar 23, 2026
+3
Well said. Perfection.
3
geekmansworldMar 23, 2026
+2
Thanks friend!
2
Connorray51Mar 23, 2026
+3
Shot decently well, some good acting performances.
Story had too many holes and lacked realism to push the movie ahead that I couldn’t get into it. Came away very frustrated saying “sure the ending was funny but the whole thing would’ve never happened that way”
3
dinnerwdr13Mar 23, 2026
+2
We saw it a while back. Both of us are fairly blind to media advertising, though moreso myself than her. I mention this only to set the stage: we go into movies blind. We don't trust critics or published reviews.
We enjoyed it. Was it scary? Not really, but it was an interesting premise. We really thought the teacher storyline was going somewhere, then well, that didn't matter at all.
2
henryswansonMar 23, 2026
+2
those poor dudes just trying to have their hot dog party
2
OlivettiFourtyFourMar 23, 2026
+1
I'm still just so tickled that the director is one of the Whitest Kids U Know.
1
RimailkallMar 23, 2026
+1
I knew *nothing* about it besides a few of the actors in it and that it was up for some Oscars. I thought it was great, and better that I went in totally blind as I had no idea it was going to have a supernatural element at all.
1
KreidediMar 23, 2026
+1
It’s got a lot of cautionary tale: don’t give in to pushy aunts, don’t let in the weird woman into your house when her story sounds fishy. Don’t just trust that the police is doing their job. Feels old school scary story, very fitting of witch lore.
I liked the tent scene with the witch randomly just waving at us before we know what the f*** she is. It didn’t make any sense, maybe it was an alternative plot line that they just kept in? But I liked that the director was just messing with us!
Both the police man and the parents get pricked in the face a whole lot. Witch pricks her hand.
1
Fat_Kid_Hot_4_UMar 23, 2026
+1
The slapstick scenes were really fun.
1
MattTreckMar 23, 2026
+1
It was definitely a standout for me I loved it. Loved all of the main cast as well they did an excellent job.
1
roses-by-geoMar 23, 2026
+1
I
1
pH0u57Mar 23, 2026
+1
My movie of the year 2025. SO SO good.
1
sightlabMar 23, 2026
+1
Horror-comedy is a tough balance (and, honestly, weapons is much more supernatural suspense than horror), but seeing Jordan Peele and Bill Hader and Zach Cregger zero in on that line *exactly* is deeply satisfying.
1
MadDogDingoMar 23, 2026
+1
I loved it except for the fact that it was “based on a true story” and then the ending not being realistic whatsoever. I understand the tone change for stating that at the beginning, but it just made the ending dumb for me.
1
Ok_Gift_5526Mar 23, 2026
+1
Weapons was the best horror movie of the year for me. Arguably best movie period but I need a few more at-bats to be sure.
1
LordsOfJoopMar 23, 2026
+2
I caught it when it was released on streaming; my expectations were modest, although I'd come to trust most of the commentary by a few sources - long ago, I stopped listening to most critics, and have only - in the last decade - started cultivating a more curated roster of insight providers. Finally, I took the plunge and watched. It took a few scenes being reviewed twice, or in one case, three times - before I felt that I had a good handle on the whole thing. I liked it, and have good vibes about it; Amy Madigan was an exceptional villain and well deserved her awards, and my hopes remain high for the future of Resident Evil's new incarnation. Zach Cregger did a great job, and I'm a fan.
2
skonen_bladesMar 23, 2026
+1
This movie in the theater was amazing. I saw it on opening weekend and literally all I knew was what little the trailers told me and that it had a lot of buzz. Packed house. It was like being on a roller coaster. Laughing our heads off, getting scared, laughing again, getting scared again, literally laughing and shrieking at the same time during to the climax. A packed theater losing it like hyenas. Amazing experience.
1
DND_Player_24Mar 23, 2026
-14
Possibly the most overrated movie of the last decade. It’s a fight between this and Sinners being overrated.
Very mediocre movie. After the villain reveal, the movie is boring af. No tension, no threat, just “oh wow…. It’s a witch…. 🙄” and then another hour of lame movie left.
The chase scene, which people enjoy for some reason, was stupid.
I watched it once. I’ll never waste my time watching it again.
(Queue the “you’re just not smart enough to figure it out” losers to respond)
-14
Stencil_AbuseMar 23, 2026
+3
Just curious could you name us a horror movie in the past year that you thought was underrated?
3
DND_Player_24Mar 23, 2026
-5
Was or wasn’t?
Depends on how you define horror. I mean, Weapons isn’t horror. It’s a lame ass drama disguised as “suspense” (hint: there is none).
So a few that meet this extremely weak definition of horror or more that aren’t overrated (either because they’re good or because they at least lived up to their modest reputation):
Opus (typical A24 craziness tolerance is needed)
The Monkey
Together (expect weird B-movie adjacent shit, get weird B-movie adjacent shit. I appreciated how they made a movie of “people sticking together” work more than “not at all”)
Companion
Frankenstein
Bugonia
-5
DatcheryMar 23, 2026
+3
So you felt literally nothing for the plight of Alex, or concern for the protagonists as they approached the witches lair? Weird.
3
DND_Player_24Mar 23, 2026
-4
No.
Honestly, it shocks me anyone would.
It’s all so over-the-top f****** stupid I had ABSOLUTELY NO buy in at all after the witch reveal. I was completely taken out of the movie and didn’t give two shits about anything for the entire second half. It’s just so kind numbingly stupid and such a let down.
“A witch did it.”
Oof.
Concern for the two parents? No. Why? Because a shitty witch who needs to perform an entire ritual to do anything is around? Who would have any concern about that?!
Except then the movie breaks all of its world building and she can apparently turn people just by lunging at them. 🤣 🤣
Just a shit final act to a very mediocre movie.
-4
rrraabMar 23, 2026
+2
Nah, they’re not deep movies, just fun ones. What do you think of Jordan Peele’s movies?
2
DND_Player_24Mar 23, 2026
+2
Get Out is excellent
Us starts so well and goes downhill
Nope is pretty good
2
thereelsupermanMar 23, 2026
-1
Love the movie, hate the title
-1
imeemeMar 23, 2026
-1
Love the title. Movie not so much
-1
ARealHumanBeansMar 23, 2026
-9
You sure love your em dashes.
-9
fortyfivesouthMar 23, 2026
+7
These are en dashes, not em dashes.
7
geekmansworldMar 23, 2026
+16
Not as much as I used to. ☹️
16
LessThanJane01Mar 23, 2026
+7
the em-dashes here are not formatted or used the way they are in AI writing, imo.
7
councilorjonesMar 23, 2026
-7
As an avid watcher of International films that incorporate witches/supernatural deeply in their culture, I honestly didn’t find anything too groundbreaking with Weapons.
Its a great film, dont get me wrong. I just think foreign films have already been doing stuff like this and Weapons’ popularity is indicative of the general population’s lack of awareness or appreciation for foreign films.
-7
SharkCrenshawMar 23, 2026
-3
Check this
https://youtu.be/mWAF-BKlj0M?si=ic17tWaFD81Q0WkJ
-3
AstroLimeLiteMar 23, 2026
-1
I loved it. Watched it in cinemas opening day, and every subsequent rewatch made me appreciate it even more
-1
enterthehawkeyeMar 23, 2026
-1
coming up on a year after release and you're worried about spoiling it?
169 Comments