· 200 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 28, 2026 at 11:01 AM

Finland to audit whether US is actually delivering NATO-bought weapons to Ukraine

Posted by jackytheblade


Finland to audit whether US is actually delivering NATO-bought weapons to Ukraine - Euromaidan Press
Euromaidan Press
Finland to audit whether US is actually delivering NATO-bought weapons to Ukraine - Euromaidan Press
"What has been promised to Ukraine must reach Ukraine" — Finnish Defense Minister Antti Häkkänen, announcing that Helsinki will audit US compliance with contracts under which European NATO members purchased weapons for Ukraine from American suppliers.

🚩 Report this post

200 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Biotic101 Mar 28, 2026 +6482
Probably a good idea...
6482
MajorNoodles Mar 28, 2026 +1242
It never even occurred to me that this could be a thing but now that it's been brought up, it almost certainly is.
1242
Firm-Advertising5396 Mar 28, 2026 +422
The Trump administration !!!! respected throughout the world for its honorable and dignified approach to helping its allies and just being dependable in general and making the world a better place for everyone .🤮🤑🤡🤡🤡🤡
422
MajorNoodles Mar 28, 2026 +266
Remember when he always used to say "Nobody respects us anymore?" Turns out it was a campaign promise!
266
Firm-Advertising5396 Mar 28, 2026 +46
Or we're a third world country, everything he says is a projection. Incredible lack of self awareness
46
SkunkMonkey Mar 28, 2026 +37
It would be more correct to say we are now a 2nd world country. 1st world was countries aligned with the US and it's allies and 2nd world was countries allied with Russia. 3rd world was non-aligned countries.
37
rintzscar Mar 28, 2026 +83
It's not even about help, it's about delivering equipment which is bought and paid for by other countries. If the US is not actually doing that, it's effectively a pirate state.
83
Local-Echo-5613 Mar 28, 2026 +69
This is the family that stole money from children with cancer so not at all hard to imagine.
69
-SaC Mar 28, 2026 +58
A guy my older sister very briefly went out with once suggested to her in the pub that children with life limiting illnesses such as terminal cancer should be 'offered' to paedophiles. His attempt at 'logic' was that it'd stop them hunting out 'normal' children, and that the kids wouldn't be around for long enough for it to traumatise them long term. Win win, he suggested. Quite how you show yourself to be such an abhorrent waste of oxygen in the space of five seconds is impressive. Needless to say, he was single seconds later, but it makes me wonder if he moved to the US and got a job in politics.
58
DE4DM4NSH4ND Mar 28, 2026 +32
That is the most horrifying opinion ive read in a long time
32
-SaC Mar 28, 2026 +16
According to my sister, he seemed perfectly normal and nice up until that point. And he's walking around there somewhere, presumably still thinking that's a valid idea and that people are weird for thinking he's incredibly wrong and fucked up.
16
TucuReborn Mar 28, 2026 +7
As someone with a lot of weird, quietly held beliefs... that is a fucked up one, man.
7
Firm-Advertising5396 Mar 28, 2026 +16
Trump is very capable of committing fraud
16
SkunkMonkey Mar 28, 2026 +7
Well, we just admitted that action in Venezuela was little more than an excuse to plunder their resources. So yeah, the US is a pirate state.
7
TheKappaOverlord Mar 28, 2026 +10
It was a thing back during the beginning of the war, but that wasn't entirely the fault of the US government back then. It was a mix of snail mail, Hungarian/Ukrainian mob stealing the weapons mid shipment to sell on the black market. (How a few Javelins ended up on advertised for sale on TOR black market sites) Zelenesky hasn't complained about weapons deliveries not reaching ukraine anymore in a while. Im sure bits and piece here are being ~~stolen~~ lost in transit, as they were before. But the shipments are overseen by CIA and MI-5. They aren't magically vanishing as a whole like listnook seems to believe.
10
HeavensentLXXI Mar 28, 2026 +7
What's wrong with making sure?
7
Duke_mm Mar 28, 2026 +1517
They already know the answer, else, why audit.
1517
ColtonComeau Mar 28, 2026 +1172
Democracies need evidence to act on something. Just can’t go off vibes the dear leader feels in his demented brain.
1172
slightlyallthetime88 Mar 28, 2026 +347
Somebody tell the USA that
347
loztb Mar 28, 2026 +282
The USA doesn't really listen or read much these days. Better to just fence them out and cut contact, like some distant drunk uncle that turned out to be a rapist.
282
Greenscreener Mar 28, 2026 +95
Except it’s a President who is a drunk pedo rapist…
95
KnightsOfREM Mar 28, 2026 +65
Inaccurate - he doesn't drink.
65
Long_Run6500 Mar 28, 2026 +57
Whisky Pete drinks enough for the both of them.
57
biscuitarse Mar 28, 2026 +11
Petey's singlehandedly saving Kentucky with Canada's boycott of their whiskey.
11
PeterVanNostrand Mar 28, 2026 +34
He just does fuckloads of coke.
34
lifesuxwhocares Mar 28, 2026 +19
It's actually diet pills from 80s/90s, so more of meth.
19
PeterVanNostrand Mar 28, 2026 +11
Either way it’s a testament to how gross he is that he do that much and still be a disgusting fat f***.
11
Anne_Roquelaure Mar 28, 2026 +5
Since hitler was also a speed freak and i heard a rumor Japan during ww2 was also using a similar substance, can we collectively decide to obliterate all things in the upper category?
5
MercantileReptile Mar 28, 2026 +12
...says him. Given everything else he ever said in his life being a lie, his sobriety likely is as well.
12
Musiclover4200 Mar 28, 2026 +18
IIRC he looks down on alcohol after his brother or other family died from alcoholism. Now coke and speed is another matter, he's a stereotypical 80's sleazy businessman after all. Also would wager he's at least self aware or paranoid enough to be wary of drugs like alcohol that lower inhibitions and loosen lips which gets a lot of high profile people in trouble.
18
MercantileReptile Mar 28, 2026 +20
Are we talking about the dude publicly wanting to screw his daughter? I'm not entirely certain he knows the word "Inhibitions", let alone ever experienced the concept.
20
mollila Mar 28, 2026 +6
He does lie almost about everything else. But have you ever seen sources of him being drunk? Except on his own ego. Maybe somehow psychologically he cannot have his narcissistic self seen in that lowly condition. IDK. But then drugs and medicine, at least his first administration was dishing out those from the White House p******* like candy.
6
Blownards Mar 28, 2026 +3
He drinks babies blood. It’s the only thing still keeping him alive.
3
VaginaTractor Mar 28, 2026 +7
And Sec Defense *is* the drunk uncle
7
Donnicton Mar 28, 2026 +15
This is the premise for my personal fan sequel to Idiocracy.  They discover that the rest of the world is actually normal and they had just walled the US off to keep them contained and the US citizens just never noticed. 
15
edelweiss_pirates_no Mar 28, 2026 +5
75% of the US can't read...prove me wrong by testing them.
5
mollila Mar 28, 2026 +4
>USA doesn't really listen or read much these days They appear to do that a lot, just not critically and not from quality of sources you had in mind. Propaganda is rampant and highly effective.
4
bli_bla_blubbb Mar 28, 2026 +10
It's quite shocking how illiterate the average US American is. I don't know what they learn in school but there are so many Americans who are so bad at basic math, geography, reading comprehension or basically anything that you are supposed to get taught in school. You can often times spot them online by their awful grammar and spelling. I guess, there's not much money left if you use all of it to fund high school and college sports teams, especially football, build fancy stadiums and pay the coaches millions of dollars.
10
Coscommon88 Mar 28, 2026 +23
The USA has unfortunately shown itself to no longer be a democracy. When Elections can be gerrymandered and rigged by the rich. When voters can be disenfranchised based on race or poverty. When checks and balances like the Supreme Court, House and Senate don't stop leaders who are facist and have bragged about wanting total control like a dictator. Sorry but the USA is no longer democratic and the sooner Americans realize that the sooner you can all decide to do something about it and take back the country from the rich and crazy regardless of what side of the political spectrum you are on.
23
Erdalion Mar 28, 2026 +34
They said democracies.
34
Black_Magic_M-66 Mar 28, 2026 +25
The USA, currently, is a democracy in name only. Trump is ruling like a king with no check on his power.
25
jaird30 Mar 28, 2026 +25
USA is not a democracy.
25
bargu Mar 28, 2026 +19
Usa is not a democracy
19
Drunk_Lemon Mar 28, 2026 +5
Hell I've tried, but as a special education teacher, I've found that kids with a receptive vocabulary related disability listen a lot better than my country.
5
fireandiceman Mar 28, 2026 +5
I don't think we fit the criteria of a democracy anymore but the evidence hasn't fully sunk in yet
5
OkValuable454 Mar 28, 2026 +9
they don't have vibes, they have intel so unofficial, now the audit will make it official edit; same "issues" with the Swiss procurements.
9
TtotheC81 Mar 28, 2026 +53
Given the Commander in Chief's history of screwing over anyone and everyone he can...
53
Ok-Mine6472 Mar 28, 2026 +12
Rubio just told reporters yesterday that they will send American arms for their own use if they have a want for it because they put America first. 
12
laowaiH Mar 28, 2026 +11
Because facts trump trump.
11
justweazel Mar 28, 2026 +8
I wonder how many are accidentally showing up in Israel. FedEx is renown for delivering to the wrong house these days
8
Menethea Mar 28, 2026 +7
The US has already announced that PURL program weapons are being diverted to the mideast, so this will just be a verification
7
ReggieCorneus Mar 28, 2026 +7
Oh yeah, as a Finn i know this is not going to be "lets find out if true" but "lets find out how bad it is". Also, why Finland was chosen, long track record of not lying is beneficial in international diplomacy.
7
isthereadrwho Mar 28, 2026 +4
Because accusations without proof are not going to get you very far
4
EgoTripWire Mar 28, 2026 +160
Knowing Trump he's probably been sending them to Russia. 
160
kfagoora Mar 28, 2026 +35
Rumor is that he's planning to take some amount of NATO-contributed money ($700mm+ IIRC) to replenish weaponry for the middle-east thing he's doing. My guess is that it's his retaliation because they openly refused to send their own troops/ships/weapons to assist.
35
OnionSea7213 Mar 28, 2026 +13
This kills US weapons exports. Reneging on deals and acting in bad faith means no future deals even if the money doesn't get refunded.
13
WhatANoob2025 Mar 28, 2026 +18
I'd argue since he knows there's a reckoning coming once he leaves/is removed from office, he's been bunkering them for his own private army, which is what he's been accumulating all those grifting billions for in order to pay for the manpower. He'll declare the sovereign nation of mar-a-lago (or knowing him, he'll probably rebrand it as Trumptopia) and fight the US.
18
donjamos Mar 28, 2026 +14
He won't survive till the end of his term, dude is already a walking corpse.
14
WhatANoob2025 Mar 28, 2026 +36
I had hoped he wouldn't make it to the end of 2025, yet here we are, still in his world, dumber, greedier and crazier than ever.
36
wtfduud Mar 28, 2026 +14
People have been saying that since 2017.
14
AGreasyPorkSandwich Mar 28, 2026 +5
His parents lived to 90 and he has better healthcare. He's not going to die anytime soon
5
Kaining Mar 28, 2026 +6
The demented brainded grifter having a master plan ? Sir, there's a "1 day decapitate the head of another foreign government and claim to have won the war" special operation going on for 3 weeks at the moment.
6
Fluffcake Mar 28, 2026 +13
This is not a question you ask unless you know the answer.
13
chrisk9 Mar 28, 2026 +12
It would be folly to trust Trump Administration at their word. The international community knows that Trump is self serving, a compulsive liar, inconsistent, no respectful to allies and agreements, and most importantly here a Russian asset.
12
avimhael Mar 28, 2026 +3244
Love this lol Just joined the alliance and is already like yeah you guys are shady af
3244
dancepantz Mar 28, 2026 +966
"Right, what's all this then?"
966
takesthebiscuit Mar 28, 2026 +233
Going to build our own NATO with blakcjack and hookers!
233
imacatnamedsteve Mar 28, 2026 +61
You know what? Forget the NATO and the b********
61
zoeypayne Mar 28, 2026 +111
Like the new guy at the office asking all the questions everyone is afraid to ask.
111
Bjanze Mar 29, 2026 +16
As a Finn,  yeah, we might be like that... Cultural honesty is a big part why we got "Happiest country in the world" so many times.
16
Mobile-Base7387 Mar 29, 2026 +6
"yo, i feel like it's possible you're just using all that stuff we bought for something else" "well as someone who's never been allowed to admit anything ever, i can definitely say we might at any time" "..."
6
Valtremors Mar 28, 2026 +206
Stuff like this is the main reason why Sweden amd Finland did not really want to join Nato. Overall distrust being biggest reason. And I am guessing if US really breaks this apart, European (continent) countries will just make their own alliance, using remnants of Nato as a framework.
206
lenzflare Mar 28, 2026 +265
No the main reason was to not piss off Russia. But then Russia invaded Ukraine
265
Irr3l3ph4nt Mar 28, 2026 +36
Lets put this back into historical context. Both Sweden and Finland were left to fend for themselves against the Rus since times immemorial. They constructed part of their national identity on the fact that they were able to survive this pressure for centuries. When offered to join NATO, they looked back at how they were left to hang during WW2, how they survived by their own means, and concluded that they were strong and capable enough to not rely on Europe. Also, they've been balancing diplomacy for so long with Moscow that they knew joining NATO could cost them more than it would give them in a Cold War setting.
36
ReggieCorneus Mar 28, 2026 +40
According to the Finno-Soviet Treaty of 1948 Finland could not join nato. Part of the deal was that any western troops in finland was banned and that in case of an attack USSR will come across the border and ~~defend it~~ take over the country. After that it was up to us, fully and Russia from 1994 to about 2009 would've not even objected since... Russia secretly wanted to be in NATO too. People of Finland objected joining. The whole question, ever since dissolution of USSR has been 100% on the hands of the people. Not USA. Not Russia. Not the government but the people.
40
psychologistgamer420 Mar 28, 2026 +17
I can't speak for Finland, but Sweden didn't join NATO because neutrality as a defense has been a rather popular notion among many swedes since the early 1900's. Lack of transparency might have been an issue, but certainly not one of the major ones.
17
haerski Mar 28, 2026 +3
Yeah. They were a major trading partner for Finland and Finland found it's niche balancing between the West and Russia while becoming more westernised. Debit/credit wasn't the reason for not joining, it was the quite unique geopolitical positioning
3
ReggieCorneus Mar 28, 2026 +32
Nope, not even close. When you have decades, and in case of Sweden, 200 years of neutrality that has worked for you very well, you do not want to throw it away. Joining nato was 100% on the people and their will. Before Russia attacked Ukraine the polling was 70/30 against joining. 48h after the attack it was 25/75. Why? Because trust TO THE EAST WAS GONE. There used to be some trust. USSR was happy about Finland being a buffer state AND it being also a western nation. It gave them some access to the western markets and it was excellent diplomatic tool to have that 3rd, neutral party between superpowers. Helsinki was the spy capital of the world and a LOT of stuff happened between the two embassies, off the books diplomacy that sorted out things before they became a crisis. And of course.. TONS of trade back and forth, Russian materials used to make western products. Not a small detail also is not the amount of goods that were loaded into that one special train car and somehow the wife of a member of the politbyroo had brand new Levi's jeans and hi-fi stereo in the living room, to the envy to all their friends... There were many things that favored status quo in so many levels. Finland supplied luxury goods in the very official black market the very top echelons, and that kind of favor pays very well in trade negotiations, and in diplomacy, which were the same thing in USSR. After USSR, Finland was still great trading partner to have, again being more developed high tech western country as a friendly neighbor was mutually beneficial. 70 years of peace is not a small thing. Only when Russia attacked, for real, no muddy waters, no little green men but straight up war of conquest, all of that was wiped away. It became clear that they WILL ATTACK if we don't join NATO. It was not mistrust but carefully maintained and well designed balance and people simply not wanting to join: this works so lets keep it. Don't poke the bear, it might be stupid but it is big.
32
kaisadilla_0x1 Mar 28, 2026 +18
It was distrust that the US would use NATO to fight its own wars, not distrust that the US would straight up steal money. That's literally the kind of shit countries like Venezuela do, and the reason why nobody gives them money.
18
lostwisdom20 Mar 28, 2026 +5
EU is already an alliance, just expand it for defence
5
Toastbrott Mar 28, 2026 +8
A lot of NATO members that are not part of the EU that are important for it though. UK, Canada, Turkey most noteably.
8
GodisanAtheistOG Mar 28, 2026 +9
"So you're telling me you guys spend 800 billion on your military every year but you can't control the strait of hormuz? Audit time". 
9
TheArmoredKitten Mar 28, 2026 +7
"rolls worst ~~joint~~ *invasion* ever, asked to leave the ~~party~~ alliance."
7
RoleTall2025 Mar 28, 2026 +523
So.. hypothetically, what if the weapons aren't actually delivered? What then
523
MasterOfTP Mar 28, 2026 +631
Well, nothing, but we can stop paying them for them.
631
kaisadilla_0x1 Mar 28, 2026 +536
tbh it's not nothing. The US taking a payment and then failing to deliver what's been paid will be massive news in the financial world. The thing that makes the US the prime destination for everyone's money is precisely that the US never, ever fucks with your money.
536
summonsays Mar 28, 2026 +186
I don't know if that's a true perception at all since Cheeto in Chief. 
186
shadowK1LOS Mar 28, 2026 +204
And this is why the US is quickly losing its "prime destination" status. If you're gonna be just as shady as China, we might as well deal with cheaper China instead.
204
asetniop Mar 28, 2026 +37
At this point, finding out that this gambino administration was no worse than China would actually be a pleasant surprise.
37
bloodklat Mar 28, 2026 +54
The US is probably closer to a «tiananmen square» event on their own soil than they’d like to admit as well.
54
TeaAndS0da Mar 28, 2026 +24
Well Jan 6th didn’t happen according to the magats
24
carnage123 Mar 28, 2026 +29
The US taking payment and not delivering....hmm who does that sound like? Lol
29
LovelyDayHere Mar 28, 2026 +110
> the US never, ever fucks with your money. rofl ~~ask to see the gold~~ repatriate the gold asap
110
Li_liminal_spaces Mar 28, 2026 +18
The US still owes Iran money for weapons never delivered, it was part of the original nuclear treaty under Obama. Republicans were disgusted they actually had to pay the money back… and it was a fraction of what was owed.
18
Impressive_Sport_707 Mar 28, 2026 +8
Its not new actually we have seen this kind of stuff several times
8
raknarokki Mar 28, 2026 +151
Who would buy any weapons from the US after finding out they don't deliver? It would be pretty catastrophic for the #1 arms exporter in the world.
151
No-Albatross-7984 Mar 28, 2026 +81
While I wouldn't wanna make assumptions before proof, Trump taking the money and not delivering is pretty much his whole story. Would be terrible and yet oddly predictable of he's extended that practice to the nation. 
81
rachelm791 Mar 28, 2026 +34
American foreign policy is now basically Trump’s personality disordered behaviour writ large
34
sporkparty Mar 28, 2026 +6
It’s his domestic policy too
6
Lost_Madness Mar 28, 2026 +5
He already bankrupted the country like every business he's ever ran. Why wouldn't the trend extend to other ways he has run businesses?
5
H0agh Mar 28, 2026 +3
He will claim he deserved to take it, because Nato Countries have been "leeching" for so long, etc. etc.
3
piasenigma Mar 28, 2026 +17
it means we're giving them to someone else secretly, so then we investigate that. Records are showing weapons being made and shipped, but not delivered.
17
Nurkanurka Mar 28, 2026 +11
Hold payments obviously. And it'd look really bad for countries considering buying miltary equpment from american contractors. Two very bad things for the USA.
11
johnsmith1234567890x Mar 28, 2026 +53
People that said we should only buy EU made weapons were right.... and thats what will happen
53
RoleTall2025 Mar 28, 2026 +17
now that i do agree with. Localise production to secure this mad time we are in
17
pessimistkonsulenten Mar 28, 2026 +956
Pentagon and DoD/DoW hasn't had an unqualified audit report in like eight years or so?
956
Skythewood Mar 28, 2026 +327
There are zero repurcussion, no firing and no political outrage. So the corruption leading to the failed audit will intensify without limits.
327
emotional_program0 Mar 29, 2026 +3
It still changes geopolitics and would only strengthen how Europe needs to stand on its own. This is a brilliant move from Finland.
3
Practis Mar 28, 2026 +135
The Pentagon is undergoing a massive, long-term renovation of their various archaic, interwoven and disperse bookkeeping systems to comply with a congressional 2028 deadline they likely will not meet. The reasons for the problems they are tackling are known and understood.
135
Uhstrology Mar 28, 2026 +64
Yeah, its called corruption.
64
Patient_Leopard421 Mar 28, 2026 +76
Former DoD civil servant here... Any large organization has some corruption. That's unavoidable. The DoD has inspectors general and various mechanisms to mitigate this. It's mostly successful. There are problematic practices but I wouldn't generally say DoD procurement or staff is "corrupt". There is a revolving door between defense contractors and senior procurement officials and officers. But I challenge someone to present widespread evidence that post-service employment with contractors causes widespread corruption. It's odious but there are checks. "Corruption", if you want to call it that, occurs around procurement programs with congressionally mandated outcomes. The DoD is basically mandated to build ships or equipment that they don't want. The whole LCS program is an example. Congress members wanted ships built in specific districts so they were built. Even those have some merit. We need to maintain a domestic industrial base. Sometimes money is "wasted" for that objective. Although, I would characterize the spending as less than optimal but not overt corruption/fraud. Looking European rearmament, maybe maintaining a defense industrial base at the expense of some waste is well-consideres. Whose to say that the Wisconsin and Alabama shipyards that built the LCSs aren't vital in the future? DoD has different objectives than private enterprises. Comparing processes is fraught with problems. Since I now work for a private enterprise, guess what? It has plenty of waste. Large human enterprises are wasteful.
76
jimsmoments89 Mar 28, 2026 +22
Pretty sure the DoD *had* inspector generals. A whole lot of them were fired if I remember the headlines of early 2025 correctly. Or that's false?
22
Patient_Leopard421 Mar 28, 2026 +17
It has an acting IG who is not Senate confirmed. But, yeah, I concur that they should be independent watchdog and the firings were odious.
17
TheKappaOverlord Mar 28, 2026 +24
>It has plenty of waste. Large human enterprises are wasteful. Not to mention you grossly oversimplified the issue for the average drooling listnookor to try to comprehend. The big meat and potatoes of the problem *is* downright wasteful spending, but a lot of that wasteful spending is due to mountains of red tape that people get surprised by, or don't plan for. Which leads to the need of needing to do a lot more wasteful spending, just to get smacked in the ass by *another* half dozen rolls of red tape. The company i work for has easily spent 8 figure alone this year because of red tape popping up and forcing them to waste more money just to get various processes complete, and just to *begin* various other processes. And in one case hand crafting a system because they were never informed they needed it for x reason. The guys in IT were absolutely busting nuts in their pants because the amount of billable overtime they were getting was absurd.
24
CosmicSpaghetti Mar 28, 2026 +6
If only the government could have something like an agency...a department even(!) dedicated to increasing government effiency.... Jokes aside, one that *actually* focused on gov't efficiency & minimizing redundant & opaque red tape bureaucracy.
6
Patient_Leopard421 Mar 28, 2026 +17
They do; it's called the Government Accountability Office. It's somewhat new being only created in 1921.
17
Practis Mar 28, 2026 +6
Western nations have observable advantages such as transparency and accountability that makes it the ideal system to thwart corruption compared to despotic ones such as Russia which is systemic, cultural and inherent. The type of corruption seen in liberal nations tends to be low level and is typically always criminalized.
6
Dowel28 Mar 28, 2026 +14
An unqualified audit opinion of any trillion dollar operation is not really possible, at that level what you’re signing off on starts to lose any meaning. Most of the issues raised by the DoD audit aren’t that they are not sure where the money is going. It’s boring stuff around whether an officer disposing of expired ordinance used the right form and got the right signatures before disposal, and made sure to store that form in the right place.
14
BackgroundSummer5171 Mar 28, 2026 +23
Pentagon can't, it has to do secret squirrel operations! No, but seriously, the Pentagon is so bloated if we popped it we'd bleed money all over the streets that people would get free healthcare. Can't have that.
23
Zestyclose-Jacket568 Mar 28, 2026 +33
I never get those "if we save money on x, then we could afford free healthcare" when universal healthcare is cheaper than whatever shit you currently have. You can have universal healthcare AND save money right now.
33
Alt4816 Mar 28, 2026 +20
>I never get those "if we save money on x, then we could afford free healthcare" when universal healthcare is cheaper than whatever shit you currently have. It shows that even many Americans that want universal healthcare have absorbed, accepted, and internalized incorrect right wing talking points that universal healthcare would cost more and require raising taxes. It's a testament to the power of Fox News, conservative AM radio, and the rest of the right wing media ecosystem in this country.
20
TheKappaOverlord Mar 28, 2026 +4
>It shows that even many Americans that want universal healthcare have absorbed, accepted, and internalized incorrect right wing talking points that universal healthcare would cost more and require raising taxes. When people refer to wanting free health care and such, typically they mean like the deal that canada has. And generally thats how they talk and explicitly say they want. In that context, right wingers are correct. Universal healthcare (Canada version) would absolutely require them to raise taxes in order to run it. And if you look at Canadian healthcare system now..... yeah. Its getting kind of bleak. But in the context of Free healthcare (European/UK edition) then no, they are absolutely wrong. You do not really need to raise taxes *that much* to fund it. Costs will innately go down because the hospitals will now have to enter the ring with the US government. Not the insurance company. There is no wiggle room with the government. You accept the terms they set or they offer you an oak chair to kick. Where as insurance companies get farmed out by hospitals setting prices, and in turn insurance prices have to reflect onto the consumer so they don't crash.
4
PM_ME_MY_REAL_MOM Mar 28, 2026 +3
i think this severely discounts just how much the value of the US dollar comes from the global influence over trade that our military holds and regardless, the inheritors of the economic value of the military won't be regular people, lol, it's gonna be corporations and crime rings
3
RLewis8888 Mar 28, 2026 +353
If Trump said it, there's a good chance it's a lie.
353
Pale-Barnacle2407 Mar 28, 2026 +125
> If Trump said it, ~~there's a good chance~~ it's a lie.
125
dbratell Mar 28, 2026 +13
He does like to contradict himself which means that one of his statement may be true.
13
crackanape Mar 28, 2026 +7
Addled as he is, he's perfectly capable of coming up with a long series of conflicting lies without ever getting anywhere near the truth.
7
InvertReverse Mar 28, 2026 +94
Good call. They have quite the fraudster running their government.
94
floridabeach9 Mar 28, 2026 +17
100% he didnt realize USA weapons mfg were working on items bound for ukraine when he started the war in iran. so he decided to take those. the guy is a fkn idiot
17
GlowstickConsumption Mar 28, 2026 +83
Very nice. Being audited is good and shouldn't cause offense or discomfort. Helps the vendor/supplier notice what they're falling short or missing, if anything comes up.
83
LevoiHook Mar 28, 2026 +34
The administration hate journalists who ask critical questions. Trump will b**** about it. 
34
DJC_Kowalski Mar 28, 2026 +25
You should audit any money that goes near Sticky Fingers Trump.
25
Content_Repair_518 Mar 28, 2026 +306
They know the answer, which is why they are public about the process. Combination of: \-Expecting immediate about-face from US, hoping to cover it up with 'late delivery, sorry about that". \-Rousing additional help for Ukraine, and momentum to push for 'fully militarized-Europe" \-Rake US over the coals publicly. Show US unreliable in a fight against Russia......dark territory results in labeling the US a rogue/NON-ally nation. \-Initiate the process/cause to investigate US officials, and take them to the Hague for international embezzlement, and acting to undermine/harm allies.
306
sirhoracedarwin Mar 28, 2026 +75
Lol "take them to the Hague"
75
[deleted] Mar 28, 2026 +40
[removed]
40
segv Mar 28, 2026 +27
The other commenter was sarcastically reminding us of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Protection_Act
27
tegat Mar 28, 2026 +19
Context: [Hague Invasion Act](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Protection_Act)
19
gizzardgullet Mar 28, 2026 +19
> Expecting immediate about-face from US Instead they will get "ha, how are we supposed to help Ukraine while dealing with the Iran quagmire? We need those munitions now for Iran. But we should be done in Iran any day now, Putin said he would not get in our way...". Eventually it will be clear that the US is being played.
19
previouslyonimgur Mar 28, 2026 +32
The problem is that the weapons weren’t a gift to Ukraine but purchased. Taking someone’s money and not delivering is called theft. Us companies would be forced to refund the money, which would be disastrous because then the company either goes broke, or the us pays the company for the weapons, in which case the deficit balloons even more. There’s no world where either Ukraine doesn’t get its weapons or Finland doesn’t get the money back (which they’ll purchase weapons from elsewhere) And it’ll demolish the us military industrial complex because if foreign nations refuse to buy our domestic product those companies will go out of business.
32
solapelsin Mar 28, 2026 +12
Yeah, my country has poured quite a lot into buying munition from you for Ukraine, so I’m very intrigued by this move by Finland and what the result will be. The US has alienated Europe so heavily already, but literally scamming money out of us in a war effort would be a new category of scumbaggery
12
solapelsin Mar 28, 2026 +20
I agree that this is likely what is going to be said, but the US isn’t getting played (except by Saudi and Russia), we are. We paid for artillery to be delivered to Ukraine. Not for the US to use their own equipment to randomly start a war in Iran. We paid, and they better have delivered in a timely fashion. To Ukraine. I’m so sick of them, honestly. Edit: so Rubio seems to be confirming this is getting redirected to Iran. Great, nice knowing you Americans
20
kindatiff Mar 28, 2026 +3
Don't forget Israel. And probably China too although they've been sitting by and observing while the US make mistakes.
3
TheLoneWolfMe Mar 28, 2026 +9
But these audits aren't about aid that the US hasn't sent. They haven't sent much aid to Ukraine in two years. This is about weapons that we have bought to be shipped to Ukraine and the US has appropriated for their stupid war in Iran.
9
solapelsin Mar 28, 2026 +10
Yeah, no. The US is raking itself over the coals, and are already labeled a non-ally. If it turns out weapons purchased by actual allies to be sent to Ukraine have not actually been delivered by the US, the rest of nato will just stop buying American equipment. Why pay for nothing. Why do you think the Hague takes up trials for embezzlement? Read a law journal or do a quick google search. 
10
nickoaverdnac Mar 28, 2026 +15
"BREAKING: Trump administration invades Finland. Says they were two weeks away from nuke"
15
Kattimatti666 Mar 29, 2026 +4
They're welcome to have it all, once we are all dead. We have been preparing for being bombed since WW2, it's going to take more than that to get rid of us. We wouldn't be able to defeat the US army but we would be able to make them regret ever coming here.
4
timmojo Mar 28, 2026 +97
Narrator: *They weren't.*
97
EW278 Mar 28, 2026 +3
Could just ask Ukraine.
3
floridabeach9 Mar 28, 2026 +8
you cant put ukraine in the position to tell trump he’s a f****** piece of shit. finland is going to take the brunt of trump’s ire. kind of like rookie hazing (finland just joined NATO)
8
kaisadilla_0x1 Mar 28, 2026 +28
How can the US keep falling lower every day? I don't think we have to explain why the US refusing to deliver something that's already been paid for is absolutely terrible for the US long-term, right? Great way to tell the world your money is no longer safe in the US.
28
MythVsLegend Mar 28, 2026 +25
Randy Marsh: "Alright guys, we gotta get rid of Finland."
25
Hoodamush Mar 28, 2026 +10
You know if they have to audit it, it likely means they don’t think they are.
10
SandSpecialist2523 Mar 28, 2026 +41
You just can't trust the US these days.
41
AlloAll0 Mar 28, 2026 +20
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised If the US was "mistakenly" delivering them on the wrong side of no man's land or "forgetting" to deliver them.
20
yukonnut Mar 28, 2026 +7
Given the American presidents history of grift and non compliance with contractual terms, I think it wise that anyone doing business with the current regime in Washington to closely monitor their performance.
7
Aquatiadventure Mar 28, 2026 +7
I bet we already know the answer
7
Maxpowerxp Mar 28, 2026 +7
That’s embarrassing
7
JohnBPrettyGood Mar 28, 2026 +6
HA HA HA HA Well Done Trump has a LONG HISTORY of making stuff up Some Americans are still waiting for their 1000% discounts on Perscription Medication
6
ScrotumScrapings Mar 28, 2026 +3
Yeah, weren’t the yanks also supposed to get money in the mail, their own great wall of China and a drained swamp? 😂 
3
TheRealBittoman Mar 28, 2026 +5
It wouldn't surprise me if they discovered the Trump admin is sending them to Russia or Israel.
5
dghughes Mar 28, 2026 +5
There's been no official word but my guess is seeing this c*** from the US pretty much decided what we in Canada will buy for jets. As in not the F35 something else. Plus Iran has show the F35 is not infallible as it's touted to be (although flying so low AAA, drones, missiles hit you is stupid).
5
gw2master Mar 28, 2026 +5
The US being the Russia-style kleptocracy that it is ... yeah, better to check.
5
xCAAx Mar 28, 2026 +5
Wait a second. That it needs to be audited, means that we aren't verifying the delivery of bought weapons... the f***?!
5
-Ny- Mar 28, 2026 +5
The fact that Finland wants to audit it likely means that 1: The Trump admins claims it was audited and everything was correct and 2: The Ukrainian administration audited it and found out little was actually delivered but don't want to openly say it because that might piss of the Trump admin. So someone else needs to verify it so they can take the heat by calling them out.
5
W31337 Mar 28, 2026 +5
Well we probably know who's pocket the payment went into...
5
ArbitraryMeritocracy Mar 28, 2026 +4
Keep the receipts.
4
Pulga_Atomica Mar 28, 2026 +5
If the Trumpistani cannot be trusted to deliver weapons after they've been paid, then there's no reason to buy from the Trumpistani. They can shove their f35 up Netanyahu's ass.
5
flimflammedzimzammed Mar 28, 2026 +4
Accidentally diverted to Putin probably
4
brokenmcnugget Mar 28, 2026 +3
"trust but verify"
3
atreeismissing Mar 28, 2026 +3
If they even think they have to audit it, it's because there's evidence the US is not delivering on it's lawful promises to Ukraine.
3
4Yk9gop Mar 28, 2026 +5
The one thing the USA is good at, selling weapons, and we can't even follow through. USD is going to be cooked long term.
5
ShortPhotograph2438 Mar 29, 2026 +5
any other president in my 75 year life time, I would say probably not true. But, with this president, I’m thinking it’s probably true. Yikes!
5
mombi Mar 28, 2026 +23
So all this bitching and moaning from the US about NATO countries paying less (even if they are meeting their 2% GDP contributions) was cause the US is pocketing those funds to buy and send weapons and other equipment that was meant to be for Ukraine to the dumbest war in modern history, started by Israel and the US. lol. Utterly embarrassing behaviour.
23
My2centsallday Mar 28, 2026 +77
My guess is that trump is arming putin.
77
mombi Mar 28, 2026 +87
The article says the suspicion is that money that was earmarked for arming Ukraine (and those goods have not arrived) is being used to fund Israel and the United State's Epstein coverup war in the middle east.
87
floridabeach9 Mar 28, 2026 +6
1. trump didnt plan shit for the war in iran. that’s a fact. 2. then he didnt realize our weapons manufacturers were working on shit destined for ukraine. 3. he started to run low on missiles and anti-air, but when he went to lockheed and northrup, they had a backlog and would take extra long because things were destined for ukraine. 4. he took a shortcut and redirected missiles destined for ukraine to go to israel and iran war. exactly what happened
6
Womble_Rumble Mar 28, 2026 +27
He isn't directly arming Putin but it cannot be understated what a life line this Iran shitshow is for the Russian economy. The spike in oil price and the sanctions Trump has taken off russian oil have taken the pressure off a redlining war economy. Everything Trump does makes more sense when you see how it benefits Putin. F****** up America? Breaking up Nato? Weakening Europe by boosting far right parties? The party when this c*** is six foot under will be epic.
27
BigDaddyDumperSquad Mar 28, 2026 +54
Uhh, pretty sure there would be a LOT of whistleblowers on that one.
54
Mechasteel Mar 28, 2026 +9
Yeah that's almost as crazy as the claim that US navy personnel were smuggling F-14 parts and Phoenix missiles to Iran aboard a US aircraft carrier, and then when a whistleblower busted them he got villified and kicked out. Specifically, this guy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_W._Jackson
9
afito Mar 28, 2026 +15
Have you taken a look at how the US treats whistle blowers? How the armed forces treats people who report literal war crimes? You can murder a dozen people, cover it up, and commit perjury and all you get is like 15 months with time served and a dishonourable dismissal while people who make things public face life in jail.
15
llamafarmadrama Mar 28, 2026 +3
From my experience working with them, most of the US military is pro-Ukraine. Not to mention that there’s precisely zero evidence of western munitions in Russian hands (beyond those captured). It’s much more likely that if they haven’t been delivered it’s because they’ve ended up in CENTCOM stockpiles in the lead up to the Iran war.
3
GrunkTheOrc Mar 28, 2026 +3
Sometimes i woder if Mark Rutte (Nato Sec. Gen) is working mostly for the americans. No proof, but he seems to back up Trumps shit an awful lot.
3
Nurkanurka Mar 28, 2026 +3
It is absolutely cringey to watch him. But to play the devils advocate. USA is by far the largest and most important part of NATO. Mark Rutte's "job" is to keep USA in NATO and ultimately to want to stay active and relevant in NATO. And if there's one thing we know Trump responds to, it's flattery and attention..
3
Graymouzer Mar 28, 2026 +3
If they are not delivered that would be very bad for the American weapons industry. Trump can screw up anything.
3
ztunelover Mar 28, 2026 +3
Wait nobody was verifying this? Come on!
3
JBagfort Mar 28, 2026 +3
As a european I am disgusted we are still allied to the USA. I have no trust at all in US commitment to decency. I do trust in Europe and our neighbours.
3
calvin43 Mar 28, 2026 +3
Adding to the saying, "A Trump never pays his debts": A Trump never honors his deals.
3
bicycle-made-for2 Mar 28, 2026 +3
I am actually surprised that they didn’t put check and balances in place when they paid for them. Based on Trump’s record for grifting, cheating, stealing, why on earth would anyone believe that there should not be checks carried out on anything when dealing with the USA
3
BlipBlapBloppityBoop Mar 28, 2026 +5
You can’t trust them anymore.
5
Anarchyz11 Mar 28, 2026 +5
As an American who works for a Finnish company, this is very on-brand for them.
5
investtill Mar 28, 2026 +9
Shameful if true
9
Sufficient_Cat_5755 Mar 28, 2026 +2
Its unlikely that any money has been sent without delivery, but not having reliable delivery on weapons, is about the worst delivery you could think of considering they are used for defense
2
RoadsideBandit Mar 28, 2026 +2
Narrator: "They weren't actually delivering the weapons."
2
Not_Sure__Camacho Mar 28, 2026 +2
My guess is Trump sent them to Israel.  
2
Mammoth-Mud-9609 Mar 28, 2026 +2
They were under Biden I doubt it is happening under Putin's poodle.
2
Brilliant_Version344 Mar 28, 2026 +2
The turn tables
2
Far_Out_6and_2 Mar 28, 2026 +2
No need to audit cause they are not
2
-Ny- Mar 28, 2026 +3
No no, that's exactly why you audit. So you can show the receipts. They presumably already know the answer, but they want to be able to prove it.
3
umbananas Mar 28, 2026 +2
Trump thinks laws are more or less just guidelines. he believes he can out run the law with lawsuits.
2
BountyMakesMeCough Mar 28, 2026 +2
You’d think this would always happen??!!
2
← Back to Board