Why must every single cameo be spoiled these days?
42
Fragrant-Vehicle-4792 days ago
+12
I watched the new Mortal Kombat II trailer >!and they reveal the game creators cameo. Why? That should have been a nice easter egg with him a bartneder and instead they feel the need to spoil what I'm sure is a two second appearance with one second of his footage. !<
12
powerlloyd2 days ago
+3
Whoopsie!
3
SillyGoatGruff2 days ago
+1
Honestly, that makes me more likely to see the movie
1
Practical-Sleep42593 days ago
+1
To advertise the show and get more viewers.
Ed Sheeran in GoT is a fun surprise but if he is gonna drum up 200k more viewers on that episode if they spoil it then yeah, they want that instead.
1
No-Stranger29362 days ago
+1
It honestly says more about the show and its creators when you can't advertise it without spoiling parts of it to get people to watch.
1
Practical-Sleep42592 days ago
+1
Well if they are very reliant on good numbers to make more of the show, yes it does, it says they would like to make more.
1
IceCreamNarwhals3 days ago
-11
It’s only spoilt if you’re permanently online
-11
VampireHunterAlex3 days ago
+7
Or you know if you casually check Listnook in the morning while drinking coffee and gearing up for your daily dump.
7
MathematicianLessRGB3 days ago
+6
I'm with you. The casual spoilers to get engagement is annoying
6
CTeam193 days ago
+1
I mean the show just came out and it isn't even 7am in all the US. Maybe wait a full 24 hours after the show releases to do this.
1
Kind-Shallot36033 days ago
+1
This sounds like projection on your part. I'm on my morning break scrolling and saw this.
1
kevinsixhohsix3 days ago
-3
Plus he needs work..
-3
Mooredock2 days ago
+3
He's actually making indie films with his Canadian friends, the last one just premiered at sxsw and got great reviews.
3
Kind-Shallot36033 days ago
-4
I think we are at 14 minutes.....
-4
MichaelMyersEatsDogs2 days ago
+3
It’s literally been a decade you dope
3
Lil_Brown_Bat3 days ago
-43
There's no way he's old enough to have watched the show when it aired.
-43
Built4dominance3 days ago
+36
Re-runs and digital channels are a thing.
I was born after Married with Children, but I saw all the episodes multiple times.
36
Careful_Wealth_49613 days ago
+30
If only there was some sort of way he could stream it after it aired
30
AsherahEnd3 days ago
+4
Does it f****** matter? are you trying to be elitist over a f****** sitcom? your life that sad? 😭😭😭
4
HereOnCompanyTime3 days ago
+8
I was curious on the timeline so I looked it up. Finn was born 2002 and Malcolm in the Middle ended in 2006, his older brother was born in 1997 so he would have been more in the demo to watch, so it's possible that Finn may have watched it very young during it's initial run. More likely he got into it during reruns, it was on FX and Nick at Night until 2011. IFC started in 2011, then Fuse 2018-2025.
8
pampooveysbacktattoo3 days ago
+3
Okay...? Who cares?
3
RelevantOldOnion3 days ago
+4
Are you not allowed to like shows unless you were old enough to watch it when it aired? That's a crazy rule.
4
ripyourlungsdave2 days ago
+2
So?..
It isn't the '90s anymore. Watching an older show is no longer considered culturally impressive.
You no longer have to go out of your way to check it out By buying a $50 DVD box set. You can just watch a few episodes real quick and then move on with your life if you don't like it.
2
StinkFartButt2 days ago
+1
I’m a fan of Hitchcock movies, my parents weren’t even born when he was making movies. I guess I’m not allowed to be a fan now.
1
MichaelMyersEatsDogs2 days ago
+1
Wait until you hear about this amazing invention called syndication.
1
Propaslader3 days ago
Neither was I.
Picked it up on DVD when I was old enough though
27 Comments