· 110 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 21, 2026 at 9:43 PM

Fox Movie Boss Says Execs Thought ‘X-Men’ Was a ‘Disaster’ and Rupert Murdoch Flipped Out Over ‘Fight Club’: ‘What Kind of Sick F—ing Human Would Make This?’

Posted by MoneyLibrarian9032


Fox Movie Boss Says Execs Thought ‘X-Men’ Was a ‘Disaster’ and Rupert Murdoch Flipped Out Over ‘Fight Club’: ‘What Kind of Sick F—ing Human Would Make This?’
Variety
Fox Movie Boss Says Execs Thought ‘X-Men’ Was a ‘Disaster’ and Rupert Murdoch Flipped Out Over ‘Fight Club’: ‘What Kind of Sick F—ing Human Would Make This?’
Bill Mechanic, the former Fox movie boss, says Rupert Murdoch flipped out of 'Fight Club' and corporate execs thought 'X-Men' was trash

🚩 Report this post

110 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
majestic7 3 days ago +540
Considering its message of course he'd hate Fight Club lmao
540
WeWantMOAR 3 days ago +118
I doubt he knows any more than "guys punching each other in basements" tbh
118
ichaosify 3 days ago +76
The rich are the most class conscious group of people in the world, so I honestly doubt it. They have every reason to keep the class war alive.
76
hockeynomics_ 3 days ago +59
No, they have every reason to make you think theres no class war. They want you squabbling amongst yourselves, not looking at who controls the systems. There’s no war in ba sing se
59
XXSeaBeeXX 3 days ago +15
No, they just want to steal my delicious pie that I left on the windowsill to cool off. They want it for themselves and the sweet aroma brings them floating over my fence all the way to my window to then hastily hatch a plan to steal it!
15
omahapioneer 3 days ago +7
Close, but I believe you're thinking of beloved cartoon bear, Yogi.
7
sidc42 3 days ago +2
2
WeWantMOAR 3 days ago +2
If you enjoy absurd comedies, I just watched Operation Taco Gary's and he played himself in it. The movie was wild.
2
Tylerdurden389 3 days ago +2
Did I write this comment?
2
No-Philosopher3248 2 days ago +1
Not surprising. The movie was amazing, but the marketing was terrible.
1
WeWantMOAR 2 days ago +1
tbf how would you even market it?
1
Takkarro 3 days ago +9
You know I've never actually seen fight club so I don't actually know what the message is supposed to be. I thought it was about some schizophrenic guy who fought with himself or something.
9
Day_Old_Paper 3 days ago +49
It’s about using anti-capitalism and anarchy as tools to reset society. Easily enough to make Murdoch shit his Depends.
49
Takkarro 3 days ago +7
Oh okay I see yeah I would imagine it would make sense why rich people would not exactly like a movie talking about doing a societal reset. It does make me wonder it's society does have some sort of reset down the line how it'll actually go for those rich people, when money is useless what happens to them lol.
7
paxtana 3 days ago +10
That is what makes it so appealing. All of the people that currently have money and power only keep those things due to social order. But for the rest of us, if you have nothing, you have nothing to lose. As to the rich, they would probably end up getting shot by whoever guards them. Why work for a rich person in a lawless society when you could just take their stuff?
10
GoonbodyEmbodiment 3 days ago +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
iameveryoneelse 3 days ago +2
If history is any indication it would be brick walls for the lot of em.
2
Tylerdurden389 3 days ago +1
Underground bunkers and private islands. Makes me wonder if they know something we dont. Only question is: if society does collapse, who feeds them, cleans their garbage, provides their drugs (both the good kind and the bad) and performs their surgeries? Dont think about thay too long. Narcissists only think of themselves and cant plan ahead.
1
CitadelMMA 3 days ago +7
I am Mary's kidneys.
7
CallidoraBlack 3 days ago +6
That's part of it, except it leaves out the part where you're not supposed to idolize Durden and realize he's capable but also insane and has created a cult. It's really not in favor of it and that's why the author thinks the ending of the movie is better than the book ending. Because it brings it back to the fact that human connection is more important than all the c*** Durden obsessed over. It is *the* anti toxic masculinity and manosphere movie and you can tell who is too dumb to understand it based on what they say they like about it.
6
HeyUKidsGetOffMyLine 3 days ago +4
Yes, this is it exactly. People confuse the anti corporate message with what the actual actions of the main character. The main character’s real struggle was had to learn to stop idealizing things. He had to “slide”. First it was his apartment he idealized and then It was Tyler Durdon. The insane cult he built had corporate structure, “franchises” and treated everyone like a nameless worker. For an anti capitalist group of dudes, The Paper Street Soap Company operated with the efficiency of the East India Trading Company. Tyler Durdan was essentially a brand for an organized crime company. The entire movie is about accepting yourself. Even the journals in the house are the narrator struggling to understand himself. I am Jack’s lack of self awareness. I make Jack write journals about the functions of his organs. It’s really a movie about a person who hates himself.
4
CallidoraBlack 2 days ago +2
Yeah, it seems like after living his entire life compartmentalizing and masking and making no genuine connections that are meaningful to him, he has a psychotic break because he refuses to figure out what he needs any other way. Something something will do literally anything but go to therapy. And Marla is kind of a train wreck, but she's the only person who really sees him even when he doesn't see himself anymore or know what's going on with him. And she sticks by him anyway because she loves him, not Tyler.
2
CosmicEveStardust 3 days ago +4
Don't think that's what Fight Club is "about" it's just what the characters do in the film.
4
Previous_Soil_5144 3 days ago +1
The movie is absolutely about our fucked up lifestyles, priorities and social order.
1
Alternative_Hotel649 3 days ago +1
It is, but it's also about how a fucked up society makes it easy for charismatic grifters to manipulate people into becoming violent fanatics.
1
Professional_Peak59 3 days ago +2
Now that made me laugh. 😆
2
skeezycheezes 3 days ago +2
It's really not though
2
BorntoBomb 3 days ago +1
Mmmm not quite. It actually suggested reseting consumer debt would reset the system. At the time it was relatively sane, but seeing as my job atthe time was precisely to plan for that kind of thing... I know why it wasnt exactly feasible.
1
Nasty_Goblin 3 days ago +3
Mr. Robot has pretty much the same premise. Then a huge heaping reality check on why that’s a stupid idea.
3
alilhillbilly 3 days ago +3
And then an entirely bonkers second ending...
3
BorntoBomb 3 days ago +2
Different time though. Not sure if youre old enough to understand the state of digital banking in fight club vs  The much later date in Mr. Robot. A disruption properly executed in the fightclub era would have had a greater chance of success. MR. Robot,  almost impossible. (And that show was fairly technically accurate,  but not close enough) As for the social implications,  time still matters. fight club was a world with a digital core but a fairly analog edge MR, was a full digital core to edge. With an analog edge you can keep your day to day society running , but not a digital edge.. thats full anarcy
2
PressureBeautiful515 3 days ago +7
You actually have it right, but from day one of its release there has always been this cringe situation where some viewers see it and don't realise that the main character's entire path, every decision he makes, is a symptom of insanity. He becomes the leader of a cult, gathering his own army of lunatics, while spouting the kind of political analysis you'd expect from a teenage boy, which in the end consists only of wanting to blow things up on an ever increasing scale. Some viewers get to the ending and they get the joke. Others get to the ending and it's too late, they already signed up to the cult before the punchline. I remember reading a review of it in NME and the critic was _outraged_ that the movie seemed to be going in such a promising direction (terrorism and cult membership as a positive lifestyle) and then wimped out at the last second.
7
CallidoraBlack 3 days ago +1
You are spot on.
1
Alternative_Hotel649 3 days ago +1
I read a letter in the local newspaper, in response to the film getting a negative review, that talked about how the film inspired them to join the army. Fight Club came out in 1999, so this guy would have been joining up just in time for 9/11 and the resultant twenty years of war in the Middle East. Imagine failing to understand a movie so badly that it leads directly to you bleeding to death in Afghanistan after an IED takes both your legs off.
1
Gluverty 3 days ago +3
That’s an aspect of it but like saying Star Wars is about some farmboy finding his father in space… it misses a few elements.
3
africanlivedit 3 days ago +2
Go watch it. It’s one amazing flick.
2
whoisyourwormguy_ 3 days ago +2
It’s similar to American psycho where the message is forgotten plus a mental health twist. AP is satire of walstreet and consumerism/capitalism. Needing to keep up with the joneses but in this case it’s having the right suits/business cards/lunch spots/reservations/music taste.
2
CaptainTripps82 3 days ago +1
Especially the ending lol
1
DiverExpensive6098 3 days ago -1
Pretty funny the message is said in a big budget big studio Hollywood movie with top Hollywood stars. Only idiots, losers and rebellious teenagers take that message seriously when it's delivered in this package and from these people.
-1
CallidoraBlack 3 days ago +2
Did you not watch the movie or not understand it?
2
DiverExpensive6098 3 days ago -2
Ask the guy above me, I'm responding to him. There's context to things. Look it up.
-2
CallidoraBlack 2 days ago +1
Yeah, and it seems like neither of you know what you're talking about.
1
DiverExpensive6098 2 days ago
Better than you.
0
Salt_Day4586 3 days ago +190
Haha get fucked Murdoch
190
DuncanYoudaho 3 days ago +33
He hasn’t been fucked like that since grade school.
33
zooalbert 3 days ago +6
You have some fucked up friends
6
StultusNosferatu 3 days ago +5
Limber though
5
BromaEmpire 3 days ago +44
I remember listening to an interview with Brad Pitt where he talked about getting stoned with Edward Norton and going to the Venice film festival. Apparently the audience hated it and they laughed their asses off while the movie was booed
44
MonThackma 3 days ago +18
So strange to me. It will forever be in my top 5 favorite films of all time.
18
lottolser 3 days ago +8
Brad Pitt also said during that encounter that it might be his best film hes ever done at the time.
8
krillthemalll 3 days ago +81
Murdoch should be in federal prison with his son.
81
RepresentativeArtist 3 days ago +200
Rupert Murdoch thinking Fight Club is sick tells you everything you need to know about the billionaire class.
200
exophrine 3 days ago +39
Here, I was, thinking that Rupert meant the aesthetically gross parts were "sick" ....and not the "anti-wealthy-elite-class" part. How silly of me...
39
macronancer 3 days ago +2
He is not wrong, bro, that movie was sick!
2
CallidoraBlack 3 days ago -2
It's supposed to be horrifying to everyone. That's the point. Anyone who doesn't realize that is a 13 year old boy or someone who hasn't matured past that point.
-2
HauntingStar08 3 days ago +71
Murdoch probably got offended at the idea of debt erasure
71
JimboAltAlt 3 days ago +27
It is kind of a bone-chilling idea if you happen to be an oligarchal parasite.
27
cyanide4suicide 3 days ago +23
This is why soulless corpo's should never be in charge of the creative process
23
quigongingerbreadman 3 days ago +19
Your daily reminder of how stupid C-Suite people are and that we should all be f****** irate they make 400x, 450x or more the median wage.
19
edwardturnerlives 3 days ago +16
Ah yes, X-Men starring Hugh Jackman, the godfather of 2 of Rupert Mudoch's daughters.
16
LiminalSapien 3 days ago +13
Rupert murdoch is human scum, the only thing we should be doing with this information is celebrating fight club. Plus fox did it's best to ruin every iteration of the X men they released. The only reason those movies were good was a mix of fiege going the extra mile and having an amazing cast evey time.
13
Square_Grand_3616 3 days ago +3
As it so happens, I will be celebrating Fight Club tomorrow evening as it is being shown at my local Cinemark for it’s anniversary.
3
Zentrii 3 days ago +40
This article is trying to get a reaction from readers and I’m not giving it to them. Hindsight is 20/20 and I’m sure there’s more context to what happened at the time and I’m not gonna read that article to find out 
40
Subliminal_Kiddo 3 days ago +19
It's not even new information. This has been known for a while. When the head of 20th Century Fox was fired the following year, it was widely reported to be in part on account of greenlighting Fight Club, ensuring Murdoch it would be a hit, then having it struggle.
19
Ozymandius34 3 days ago +10
That head of fox hadn’t been fucked like that since grade school
10
allothernamestaken 3 days ago +7
He wanted to have Murdoch's abortion.
7
turb0_encapsulator 3 days ago +4
but it ended up being a huge hit on DVD.
4
Poku115 3 days ago +2
Ahhh good ol fencesitters
2
Luci-Noir 3 days ago +2
As usual Listnook just reads the clickbait headline and rages.
2
seanmonaghan1968 3 days ago +5
I thought both movies were excellent and they represent the types of movie that people actually go to the cinema for vs the unoriginal, generic sequel rubbish that we mostly get now
5
m0rbius 3 days ago +3
Leave it to Murdoch to be outraged at getting back at the rich and powerful corporations that keep people as debt slaves. Not at all surprised by Murdoch's going for the sleaze and trashy to win over audiences. That is still his go-to strategy with his media empire.
3
Lain_Staley 3 days ago +10
Fight Club is sick only in its symbolic preamble to 9/11 or rather, psyching young American males up to fight (overseas). Not the only media to do so in this time period. 
10
TempleMade_MeBroke 3 days ago +11
Right? Like, Mr. Murdoch; *you* and *your actions* directly led to the creation of this particular piece of media
11
CallidoraBlack 3 days ago +1
Only really dumb young men who didn't understand anything they saw. Which is a lot of them.
1
Lain_Staley 3 days ago
The entire target demographic was young men. Ones that are persuaded that normal corporate life is so mind-numbingly boring and inherently purposeless, that one can cure it by fighting. The most acceptable way to do that? Military. Especially combined with the national pride that swelled up to Pearl Harbor levels post 9/11. Pearl Harbor? When did that film come out exactly?
0
CallidoraBlack 2 days ago +1
So. You're telling me that you didn't understand it either? And you're conflating it with actual war films? Wow. Great media literacy.
1
Lain_Staley 2 days ago
Politics is downstream from public opinion. How does one shape public opinion?
0
CallidoraBlack 1 day ago +1
So you think the people who were making the decisions were so dumb that they thought using a movie that actually criticizes doomerism and cults of toxic masculinity and superficial displays of progressive ideology by people who only want to make chaos and don't care about the cause...was the way to inspire patriotic zeal in the youth? I'm starting to think you ask spoonfeed type questions like this because you think people are dumb for not understanding you. I understand, but what you're saying makes no sense and you seem incapable of defending your claim.
1
Lain_Staley 1 day ago
>using a movie that actually criticizes doomerism and cults of toxic masculinity and superficial displays of progressive ideology by people who only want to make chaos and don't care about the cause...was the way to inspire patriotic zeal in the youth You are conflating two things. The critic examining the message of the film. And what the mainstream demographic derives from that movie. Do you have an understanding of how much of a "bro film" this was perceived as at the time? It is right up there with "300". The importance of Media is how they impact the psyche of the masses. The message to fight need not be patriotic. It is saying to young men, **to fight is to feel alive**.
0
CallidoraBlack 1 day ago +1
Only idiots thought this because **they missed the entire point of the movie**. The idea that this movie was created and put out for that purpose is patently absurd. A thing you have said and failed to even attempt to validate, instead dancing around the issue. I suspect that's because you can't. Next you'll be claiming that Starship Troopers was filmed and put out to boost military recruitment in the late 90s. It's about the same quality of logic.
1
AmbitiousButRubbishh 3 days ago +3
Imagine being one of the most reprehensible, soulless, heartless, pure evil ghoul, who’s willing to destroy society, humanity, and the viability of life on this planet, ALLLLL for a couple more bucks And still having the gaul to say a **fiction writer** is a sick f****** human being & while the other is suborning literally reality with gross fictitious lies all for the sake of destroying humanity & society, purely for profit This man doesn’t even bother to judge films on any kind of merit—let’s be real He was just shook and upset and confused that the s*** superhero popcorn movie was not as popular as the weird narrative driven movie Normal people try to figure out where they/this/that went wrong, billionaires just get angry and blame others I bet he felt even more justified in destroying humanity and society after this
3
NoGoat3930 3 days ago +3
The kind of sick fucks whose lives have been destroyed, and families torn apart by misinformation campaigns and fake news.
3
braxin23 3 days ago +3
The definition of Typical “conservative” with conservative values thinking that apparently everyone loves the world that “they’re building”. Maybe if they stopped smelling their own farts we’d all be in a better world.
3
allothernamestaken 3 days ago +2
You would think that the execs would be looking at films purely in terms of probable return on their investment and not the content itself. Fight Club underperformed at the box office, but X-Men was pretty huge.
2
Comfortable-Face4593 3 days ago +2
Proving billionaires should decide or influence nothing
2
00Pete 3 days ago +2
I mean, if anyone speaking from pure experience has insight into what makes people sick...
2
VernBarty 3 days ago +2
It always baffles me when I hear people though X Men was a flop. I remember the monet I realized movie critics are full of c*** is when one very confidently proclaimed that X Men would never get a sequel. I knew INSTANTLY in that theater that movies were about to change forever and that we were seeing the beginning of a framxhise that would go the distance.
2
Humble_Rogue 3 days ago +2
All those people need to be fired.
2
Way_ward_23 3 days ago +2
I remember when I first saw fight club. It was at a friend's house and I felt it was the first movie I ever saw that when it ended, i just "got" it, like somehow inexplicably id unlocked just how shit worked. It was a weird feeling. In thinking about it now, a social reset i believe is needed but the problem with things like that is what about the day after ? It seems like there's always a plan for the act but not the aftermath.
2
vsingh93 3 days ago +1
I mean he's BFFs with Hugh Jackman so apparently it all worked out.
1
morph1138 3 days ago +1
Yet another reason why studio executives shouldn’t be the ones making creative decisions. I will never understand Hollywood.
1
Professional_Peak59 3 days ago +1
How long until Rupert Murdoch finally croaks, or is he going to achieve immortality?
1
givemeonereasonwhy 3 days ago +1
I often wonder what it would’ve it been like working at the studio during the Mechanic era, having started working at TCF a few years afterwards. In addition to ID4, Titanic, X-Men, he also brought back Star Wars in 1999 with Phantom Menace. That era was willing to take expensive and/or creative risks. During the late 2000’s and early 2010’s it was all about cost containment. Sure, Fox made high priced tentpoles, but if it came down to spending an extra 5 or 10 million to make a better film, they wouldn’t do it. And speaking of 20th Century Fox, that merger with Disney should’ve never have happened. Everyone in the industry is up in arms about the Paramount/WB merger, but the outrage and reaction for Disney buying 20th Century Fox was never this strong. Maybe people in Hollywood were just glad that Murdoch was in charge of one less aspect of the media. Or Marvel fans were glad Marvel was getting the X-Men franchise back, which by the way, they haven’t really done much with outside of Deadpool. In the end, less movies got made, and it cost people their jobs.
1
Sasquatcheeethree 3 days ago +1
Hey I agree about the 20th century fox disney merger. Other then Andor, Rogue One, a lot of trash
1
ItsUselessToArgue 3 days ago +1
Looking how the fandoms turned out, he’s kinda right
1
A__D___32 3 days ago +1
This just made me remember that I saw Fight Club for the first time, stupid and young and not aware it was satire, on TV waiting for what the interwebs said would be the world premiere of the Xmen trailer.
1
StBlandine7 3 days ago +1
I was 13 when X-Men came out and I thought it was pretty dumb even then
1
KenUsimi 3 days ago +1
An even better question is how many sick f****** humans really vibed with Fight Club. Not that I’d know anything about the movie, ofc.
1
Mrchristopherrr 3 days ago +1
Tbf after Invisible Monsters wasnt picked up and was called too disturbing Chuck P wrote Fight Club in an effort to be more disturbing intentionally and it turned out to be his first big hit,
1
ManufacturedOlympus 3 days ago +1
He founded a news station where the head guy organized it basically as an environment to sexually harass the employees. But fight club is what he found shocking. 
1
ManufacturedOlympus 3 days ago +1
Poopert Turdcock 
1
2reeEyedG 3 days ago +1
They rarely know what the hell they’re talking about. I blame them for the DC universe to be so far behind. WB execs could never get their shit together on what they wanted out of it and caused so much bs with creators
1
Bigchunky_Boy 3 days ago +1
Fox to dumb for you
1
MrSweetpotato93 3 days ago +1
“Sick F** Human” ohhh man the irony
1
olkeeper 3 days ago +1
Murdoch: "What kind of sick f****** human would make this." Me: "David Fincher, he's the best we've got."
1
GorganzolaVsKong 3 days ago +1
Proceeds to rot the brains of an entire generation with hateful propaganda - muttering “sick fucks”
1
redthehaze 3 days ago +1
Rupert Murdoch probably got scared thinking it would cause a class revolution but instead it helped his ilk because people are stupid.
1
ssgtgriggs 3 days ago +1
god I hate these people, I hate them so f****** much
1
Tylerdurden389 3 days ago +1
Fwiw, at least back then a movie like that could get made and the worse thing to happen was a rich, powerful person took umbridge with it. Notice how there's almost no new entertainment that addresses important issues anymore, and when they do on social media, their websites and patreons get deleted?
1
ventodivino 3 days ago
X Men was pretty trash.
0
← Back to Board