· 100 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 23, 2026 at 8:16 PM

France takes climate off the agenda at G7 environment talks to avoid US clash

Posted by Nepridiprav16


France takes climate off the agenda at G7 environment talks to avoid US clash
France 24
France takes climate off the agenda at G7 environment talks to avoid US clash
A meeting of the G7 nations on the environment begins in Paris on Thursday, but climate change has been left off the agenda to avoid a dispute with the United States, France’s Ecology Minister Monique…

🚩 Report this post

100 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
tkcool73 Apr 23, 2026 +240
I feel like climate issues have taken a backseat the last few years, not just among politicians, but in discourse in general
240
RarelyReadReplies Apr 23, 2026 +152
Probably because billionaires have pushed so many of us to the edge that we're just trying to keep a roof over our heads. I'm not saying it's okay to ignore the climate crisis, just a theory on what has changed in recent years for many people. Priorities shift when you are afraid of being homeless or food insecure. I don't think billionaires will be happy until we're all essentially enslaved, and they can rule over the dystopian ashes that remain. I hope something will jolt people awake before it's too late to stop it.
152
Either_Candy5687 Apr 23, 2026 +66
Environmental efforts require funding, and a lot of right leaning governments have other priorities, like austerity measures and the rich getting richer...which leave people unable to focus on much more than surviving...so those environmental concerns are then less in the forefront.
66
CirnoWhiterock Apr 23, 2026 +15
It also doesn't help that when a government actually takes a step or two forwards the elite can simply close up everything there and move it to some other country that'll let them just dump waste in the neaeby rivers. The "Race to the bottom" issue is why climate policy has to be tackled internationally, but then it becomes all to easy for Right wingers to campaign on National Pride/F*** UN bureaucrats.
15
Herschel_Wallace Apr 24, 2026 +3
We're in the second long depression (Gilded Age 2).
3
GilbyGlibber Apr 23, 2026 -6
More like we're still feeling the impacts of the COVID shutdowns on the economy.
-6
RarelyReadReplies Apr 24, 2026 +8
Cool red herring.
8
GilbyGlibber Apr 24, 2026 -4
i'd argue that would be the comment i responded to actually
-4
Dragoniel Apr 23, 2026 +34
Europe is engaged in a war, US is engaged in idiocy and China is killing it solo.
34
CarRamRob Apr 23, 2026 +24
China is also using the most coal and oil it ever has. They are just simply expanding their energy needs to Western levels and take all of them. I wouldn’t call them “killing it” from an environmental perspective even if they are making strides in renewables.
24
CryptoThroway8205 Apr 24, 2026 +6
It's not just that. 80% of solar panels are manufactured in China. China and Vietnam together have a duopoly on solar panel manufacturing. 60% of wind turbines are made in China. Most of the countries expanding their renewable energy infrastructure today are doing it off of Chinese manufacturing. If you don't want your solar panels manufactured using coal you can make them yourself. But if you have a higher percent of energy met by solar panels and they were made in China then it's still half China's credit.
6
Federal_Score5967 Apr 23, 2026 +17
That's true, but wind and solar is taking a bigger and bigger portion of power production percentage wise so at least they're moving in the right direction. The US seems to do whatever they can to move away from green energy.
17
CarRamRob Apr 23, 2026 -11
Percentage means nothing. Total coal usage is increasing and China is celebrated.
-11
-ram_the_manparts- Apr 23, 2026 +8
2025 marked the first such decline since 2015 in Chinese power generation via coal, dropping by 71 TWh. [Source](https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/china/?hl=en-CA#:~:text=This%20represents%20a%20structural%20shift,Coal%20mine%20methane%20in%20China) You really think someone would do that? Just go on the internet and tell lies?
8
CarRamRob Apr 23, 2026 -7
One year makes a trend now? It’s been increasing steadily. A small drop year over year is nothing. Trend is your friend. Edit: seems like you don’t understand my position with your deleted reply. I’m saying increasing by 50% means a lot, even if renewables are growing faster. The largest consumer of coal is still increasing
-7
-ram_the_manparts- Apr 24, 2026 +4
You're right, this is total coal generation in China from 2001 to present: https://i.imgur.com/IKN4ht2.jpeg However, renewable energy sources are expanding much faster than coal. China's 5-year plan is a reduction of coal by 30 million tons per year. Let's revisit that chart in 2030. Personally I'd short it now, but if you want to go long, go for it. Edit: Yeah I deleted it quickly because I misunderstood the chart I posted, just because of the formatting of the website, and rushing. I hope you find this reply more reasonable. Notice how I can't crop the image to completely exclude the title of the next chart without clipping off the 0 of this chart? That's weird, right? Wait is the bottom one describing this chart? (Just noticed that formatting is only on mobile)
4
3_Thumbs_Up Apr 24, 2026 +9
Percentage indicates the long term trend and what they believe in most. If the percentage of renewables keep climbing, then coal and gas will eventually be insignificant in comparison, and it will be much more viable to cut it completely.
9
Federal_Score5967 Apr 24, 2026 +2
Percentage means everything. A growing economy will always increase it's energy demand, so it makes sense coal usage still goes up. The fact that green energy takes a larger and larger portion of the total energy production is a great sign. Coal usage is going up less and less and will start to drop off more and more in the future.
2
CarRamRob Apr 24, 2026
So, if China is growing, then they can do what they want, even expanding coal more than the rest of the world? They are increasing renewables, but their total coal usage is what the environment cares about, not a percentage. https://blogs.sas.com/content/graphicallyspeaking/2021/10/20/which-countries-consume-the-most-coal/ Those are much higher gross CO2 levels increasing.
0
Alixen2019 Apr 23, 2026 +5
You *could* argue that they are "*killing* it" from **a** environmental perspective.
5
-ram_the_manparts- Apr 23, 2026 +6
42% of total electricity production in China in 2025 was from clean sources. The global average is 43%.
6
NMe84 Apr 24, 2026 +2
The notable part is that they seem to really be working on expanding their renewable energy sources (insofar the Chinese government is reliable as a source of information anyway), but it seems like their growing need for energy is outpacing the amount of renewable energy sources they are actually realizing.
2
SuccessfulPres Apr 24, 2026
False. Both China and India have dropped coal usage due to China’s massive investments in renewables. https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-coal-power-drops-in-china-and-india-for-first-time-in-52-years-after-clean-energy-records/
0
VEMODMASKINEN Apr 24, 2026 +3
I mean, from that website we also have: https://www.carbonbrief.org/rush-for-new-coal-in-china-hits-record-high-in-2025-as-climate-deadline-looms/ ...
3
SuccessfulPres Apr 24, 2026 +1
Well then it pays to read- building new coal power plants does not equal increased coal usage. Coal operating hours are down, used as a baseload only for when renewables are down. Literally from the same article you posted: > But emissions from the power sector have been flat or falling since March 2024, according to analysis for Carbon Brief by CREA lead analyst Lauri Myllyvirta.   This is largely due to China’s rapid installation of renewable power, which is covering nearly all of new electricity demand and pushing coal generation into decline in 2025. 
1
CarRamRob Apr 24, 2026 +1
Well, guess what happened in 2026? LNG gets cut off and those built coal plants are humming since March 1st.
1
Either_Candy5687 Apr 23, 2026 +8
...and I'm sure that's in no way influenced by the increasing number of people in power claiming the environment isn't a concern (for their own agendas), despite scientists saying it very much is.
8
Koala_eiO Apr 23, 2026 -2
No because that's entirely a USAmerican thing. My news have also showed significantly fewer articles about ecology in recent years despite not having a 79 years old hoax believer as a president.
-2
Either_Candy5687 Apr 24, 2026 +7
It is absolutely NOT only a US thing. There are other governments around the world, that have the same "ideology" and processes to downplay environmental impacts, especially when it affects their ability to make a profit.
7
daiwilly Apr 23, 2026 +2
Yeah, but the backseat is on fire!
2
dimwalker Apr 24, 2026 +2
We don't want to upset senile orange pedo, so lets just drown quietly.
2
themcsame Apr 23, 2026 +3
A lot of other issues have come to the front, in large part driven by cost of living concerns in many developed nations. The legitimacy of those issues is another matter in itself, the issue tends to be deeper than what's often being targeted and more nuanced than one single (this isn't the thread for that discussion, so I'll leave it at that) End result is people are personally more bothered about other issues, likewise, cost of living means they're less likely to pay more upfront for the greener option. Likewise, it's sort of moot for the general consumer to really go all in on climate issues. The polluters are companies, consumers are effectively just dealing with what gets thrown at them. To put it bluntly, most people simply don't give a f***, they often don't have the luxury to care about it. Most of us are opting for things we perceive to be offering us the best value \[for what we can afford\]. There's then also the matter of whether the 'green' option is even suitable for people. Of course, the best example of that being BEVs. For some people, they're just not in a position to effectively make use of the technology or even see a benifit from it (I.E High public charging costs for those unable to charge at home) There's also circulating opinions that I'd probably sum up as 'individual contributions are like pissing in the ocean compared to what X is spewing out'. X usually being a certain industry, country, event, etc. When so many people are focused on just getting by, or dare I say just trying to survive, those people aren't going to give a shit about what we think will happen to the Earth in 10, 20 or 30 years time. They're focusing on getting through today, tomorrow, this week, this month, rinse and repeat with every pay slip. They have to get through today before they can make it to that 10 year mark.
3
MisterBlisterKisser Apr 23, 2026 -7
It’s because there’s nothing we can do about it. It’s too late. We went past the point of no return that they were warning us about (2.5 degrees). 
-7
Only--East Apr 23, 2026 +8
We have not in fact passed the point of no return. Giving up and saying it's too late it what they want you to do. The climate crisis is gonna f****** suck for everyone, but it's not the end of the world. A lot of what we've done climate wise is reversible. Tipping points are just points that make it harder to get stuff under control, but it's feasible to do. Don't be defeatist or else it will be too late.
8
alematt Apr 23, 2026 +34
Like tip toeing around a toddler
34
Tall_Ad1615 Apr 24, 2026 +2
In this case European countries are acting like bad parents who let a toddler run their household. 
2
alematt Apr 24, 2026 +2
Yah 100%. They need to stop trying to appease the pumpkin d*****
2
Tall_Ad1615 Apr 24, 2026 +1
Yes but they're appeasing him because there's something in it for them as well, these deals are a two way street. They (European politicians) avoid scrutiny because their people are focused just on one side (USA and Americans) and not them, divide and conquer. While common people bicker, the politicians all get their cut. 
1
Keljantri Apr 23, 2026 +120
diplomacy at its finest just ignore the burning planet
120
Sueti_Bartox Apr 24, 2026 +2
There is no diplomacy with Trump, just childish tantrums and lies. Can't blame Macron for that one; next time US should not elect someone entirely incapable of leading and rational thought.
2
altro43 Apr 24, 2026 -5
Oh i had no idea . The planets on fire?!
-5
HyperionSaber Apr 23, 2026 +60
The morons are hurting everyone with their implosion
60
frddtwabrm04 Apr 24, 2026 +3
>“You’ve got to remember that these are just simple farmers,” he tells Bart. “These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know … morons!”
3
Catch_022 Apr 23, 2026 +15
Why? Do they really think the US is going to be a useful or trustworthy partner in any deal or negotiation they make?
15
Tall_Ad1615 Apr 24, 2026 -1
Of course they do, deals are a two way street. 
-1
picknicksje85 Apr 23, 2026 +83
Thx America 🙄 Idiots.
83
Peripatetictyl Apr 24, 2026 +15
Don't wanna be an American idiot One nation controlled by the media Information age of hysteria It's calling out to idiot America
15
Tall_Ad1615 Apr 24, 2026 +2
You can also thank European countries who are complicit. They make decisions that benefit their politicians one way or another. You think lobbying, bribes and blackmail only happen in USA? 
2
picknicksje85 Apr 24, 2026 +3
Sure but we can't even talk about it anymore because we have to walk on eggshells for a pedo president.
3
Tall_Ad1615 Apr 24, 2026 +1
Im saying that this is the doing of both USA and Europe, and a few other countries. The inability to comment is right where they want you because it lets them avoid scrutiny and EU and Canada are leading the world in censorship, but sure make fun of Americans when they are loud about not wanting their freedoms taken away. Not you btw, just common discourse. 
1
WhySayManyWordGancho Apr 24, 2026 -2
sincerely, Our bad
-2
jsnxander Apr 23, 2026 +21
Just have talks without the US regarding climate and move on. The current administration could give exactly two shits about the health of its citizens and especially the healthy of its current citizens' grandchildren, clean air and water, or the environment in general. Given this lack of care and concern for its own citizens, you can imagine how much regard the current administration has for the rest of the world's citizens and future grandchildren.
21
FutureBulky4537 Apr 25, 2026 +1
Climate never was a subject taken seriously in France politics. It gives them another excuse to not do anything.
1
International_Bee653 Apr 23, 2026 +13
Always backing down will embolden them more, ah well
13
AmericaVotedTrump Apr 23, 2026 +57
I hate that the US has so much economic power that most countries need to capitulate to our man child president and low intelligent voter base lest their economies suffer. We deserve to be a pariah state
57
Groentekroket Apr 23, 2026 +25
Luckily, and by their own fault, that power is waning a lot right now. 
25
Brief_Hospital_1766 Apr 23, 2026 +5
Yeah, about that economic power...
5
M4rth1988 Apr 23, 2026 +18
weak, who cares about a US clash, why are we still trying to cater to them? Until they get their shit sorted we should not give a rats ass about them. Climate should not be shoved aside for this shit.
18
I_Push_Buttonz Apr 23, 2026 +12
The rest of the world doesn't need US permission to transition their energy industries. Why do you feel the need to discuss it with the US at all?
12
Objective-Donkey9499 Apr 24, 2026 +1
Because we all share the same air, it's a planetwide issue.  If the US can't be bothered to pull its weight then the others will have to compensate for their emissions if they want to fix the climate. Their inaction is making it harder for everyone else.
1
I_Push_Buttonz Apr 24, 2026 +1
> Their inaction is making it harder for everyone else. There isn't a single party to the Paris Climate Accord that met the goals they agreed to in it. Hell only like a dozen countries ever even submitted the NDCs they agreed to submit (IE: their plans for reducing their emissions). The US, even with administrations overtly hostile to climate change mitigation efforts, has still continually reduced its emissions drastically. US emissions are lower today than they were in 1990 while also having a near 40% larger population. Trump isn't going to change his stance, so all bringing it up at this meeting would accomplish is deliberately riling him up, which in turn could result in another round of tantrum-induced tariffs and tit for tat trade retaliation. And for what? Why kick all of that off, when nothing they say will change anything, on a topic where nothing anyone pledges to do matters anyways?
1
Gierni Apr 24, 2026 +2
Since I took the time to verify (and end up spending way to much time looking at graphs) I confirm that's true : [https://ourworldindata.org/profile/co2/united-states](https://ourworldindata.org/profile/co2/united-states) I want to add that despite that, USA was still the 12th biggest in 2024 when it comes to CO2 emission per capita (with 14.20T). Numbers that I find surprisingly high when compared to, for example, France (3.97T) but that are very close to similar country like Canada or Australia.
2
aapowers Apr 24, 2026 +1
France mainly has nuclear power, they don't drive as much, and their houses are smaller so require less heating. That pretty much covers it.
1
Winterplatypus Apr 24, 2026 +1
It's better to not raise the topic of climate with the G7 until trump is gone because that way you avoid any stupid permanent decisions being made. The topic can remain undecided until you can raise it with a more sensible leader.
1
frddtwabrm04 Apr 24, 2026
The others are doing it. They choose to not deal with dumbassery.
0
[deleted] Apr 23, 2026 +23
[removed]
23
MisterBlisterKisser Apr 23, 2026
The US needs a policy where they don’t let their citizens leave and they don’t let anyone in. Contain that mess. 
0
amiibohunter2015 Apr 24, 2026 +9
>France takes climate off the agenda at G7 environment talks to avoid US clash The point of G7 environment talks are?
9
Gold-Appearance-4463 Apr 24, 2026 +1
Photo Op
1
AMCorBUST2021 Apr 23, 2026 +7
Angus King, Mike Lee, Lisa Murkowski in this weeks hearing with energy secretary Chris Wright made it clear the US priority is coal. Also oil and gas. The world is choking on smoke and just cannot help rushing to throw more on the fire. Those names above should be burned in all of our brains because these actions will kill millions, if not billions.
7
Naghagok_ang_Lubot Apr 23, 2026 +6
P****
6
cookiidou Apr 23, 2026 +3
Dont do that France.. dont go to the idiots level..I understand but I would shove it down his throat .all the microplastics isn't bull sh!t..they are real .
3
fheathyr Apr 24, 2026 +3
Poor Donald, he's too old and feeble minded to deal with reality ... so we don't talk about grown up things when he's in the room.
3
haroldthehampster Apr 23, 2026 +2
oh that's ridiculously shortsighted and fawning no less
2
thespice Apr 24, 2026 +2
Imbecile
2
Gransmithy Apr 24, 2026 +2
Can’t they put the US delegation into a pig pen while the adults discuss the climate?
2
No_monster Apr 24, 2026 +2
Wtf cowards. How can you not talk about climate change in environment talks? 
2
Koala_eiO Apr 23, 2026 +2
F***.
2
crookdmouth Apr 23, 2026 +1
Really?
1
BenTramer Apr 23, 2026 +1
Let’s cater to the US. Cmon
1
TheHistorian2 Apr 24, 2026 +1
There will be three people left on our desert world and one will still be kicking the can down the road away from the other two.
1
Least-Raddish1930s Apr 24, 2026 +1
Cowards kowtowing to Dementia Don & his puppeteers.
1
SoftwareSource Apr 24, 2026 +1
"Math has been removed from the school curriculum so as to not anger teenagers".
1
goldbeater Apr 24, 2026 +1
Maybe talk to them about their filthy habit of burning coal. Why pander to these idiots ?
1
nilssonen Apr 24, 2026 +1
I mean, what's the point? The US of A won't be involved in climate action until last week of January 2029 at the very earliest anyway. If work is to be done just call a meeting with the nations willing to work for a future for our children and grandchildren.
1
DryWeb3875 Apr 24, 2026 +1
Just call it Energy Security. Easy.
1
Plastic-Ad-2496 Apr 24, 2026 +1
Great idea, just take the most important subject away because it upsets the man activly trying to ruin us.
1
tempestwolf1 Apr 23, 2026
Fr*nce still raising that white flag
0
Enoch-Of-Nod Apr 23, 2026 +1
Seriously though... Talking about the climate and making promises at a conference have gotten the world this far up shit creek, simply not talking about it isn't much worse. It was always just grandstanding and empty promises, green washing and outright lies. This is barely even another nail in the coffin.
1
Commercial-Hurry2693 Apr 23, 2026 +1
france really just scrubbed the whole climate section to keep the g7 from turning into a total mess.
1
D77889900 Apr 24, 2026 +1
Pussies. Just do it.
1
NOT_EVEN_THAT_GUY Apr 24, 2026 +1
America is a jabroni state
1
[deleted] Apr 23, 2026 -2
[deleted]
-2
MisterBlisterKisser Apr 23, 2026 +4
That’s because the Americans are trying to destroy Cuba by blocking oil. 
4
Kaziglu_Bey Apr 23, 2026
As long as we get to be there and talk a lot, we can make adjustments.  -- French foreign policy.
0
Fandango_Jones Apr 23, 2026 -2
France backing down?
-2
InterestingPop9664 Apr 23, 2026 -11
Good, the grift is garbage, Carney still tries to push it.
-11
frddtwabrm04 Apr 24, 2026 +1
What part of climate change is a grift? Like seriously it's getting hotter, weather is getting weirder/erratic.... We have done this to ourselves by doing dumb stuff. Sure, some solutions are cuckoo but you have got to be an idiot to deny that climate is not changing.
1
Puzzled-Maize-2241 Apr 23, 2026 -11
So, the same strategy the French used in world war 1, and world war 2. Lie on their back and surrender.
-11
frddtwabrm04 Apr 24, 2026 +1
There are many ways to kill a rat You can do it directly or indirectly., both achieving the same goal. My guess France decided to do it indirectly.
1
← Back to Board