French prosecutors summon Elon Musk over allegations of child abuse images and deepfakes on X

Its still amazing that even the people running Epsteins pedophilia ring didnt want to hang out with him.

Girls ftw!

He's buying off politicians, too. Elon Musk, who wanted to go to "the wildest party" on Jeffrey Epstein's Child R*** Island, is paying for the Williamson County (TX) GOP party chair's (Michelle Taff Evans) personal legal defense against possible sex pest charges. I'd say sex pests stick together, but that has entirely too many bad connotations... and you'd probably have to go get the club soda afterwards. ----- [The saga of Michelle Evans eagerly sucking down Elon Musk's money looks to be taking a darker turn.](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/12/30/x-elon-musk-texas-trans-bathroom-photo-first-amendment/87948016007/) **Why is this a problem?** [Musk has been open about wanting to build company towns in Bastrop County like he's trying to live out some Southern Plantation owner fantasy,](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snailbrook,_Texas) and congressional districts covering Bastrop County also overlap with Wilco. That means Evans has influence over elections where Musk's businesses and employees are constituents, and Musk stands to benefit from influence or control over her. **So how does Musk get influence over Evans, a party chair and elected official?** Last year, Evans sued DA Garza in an attempt to get out of [facing charges for distributing a picture of a trans legislator candidate that was taken in a bathroom at the Capitol.](https://www.kvue.com/article/news/local/travis-county-da-pursue-case-bathroom-photo-williamson-county-gop-chair/269-ead5aacb-7a7f-40d6-abe3-3e650b5e9982) The state Supreme Court denied her request to hold the law unconstitutional, so a case against her can go forward. For her actions, [Evans could be facing state jail felony charges.](https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/?tab=1&code=PE&chapter=PE.12&artSec=12.35) **That means no voting, no firearm ownership, and being barred from holding elected office on conviction. That's the kiss of death to a politician's career.** Anyone could see how she'd be desperate to either have the charges dismissed, reduced to a class A misdemeanor, or to tie them up for years in court, which she personally wouldn't have the money to do. There's also sex offender registration. She's ranted and raved for years, claiming that trans individuals are perverts and sex offenders, [but she'd be the one on the list if convicted.](https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/penal-code/penal-sect-21-15/) However, Musk is paying for Evans's _personal_ legal problems via the Texan far-right's favorite lawyer, Tony McDonald. Sound familiar? He should. He's notorious for being at the beck and call of infamous 7 Mountains Dominionists Farris Wilks and Tim Dunn, who have been hellbent on jamming white nationalism's favorite brand of "Christianity" down the US's throats. He also represented Danielle Marie (Kobe) Weston and Dr. Mary Alice Bone when their lawbreaking actions threatened Round Rock ISD, and he's counsel for the right-wing rag _The Scorecard._ So, high stakes, high cost, possible sex offender registration, _and_ the possibility of being proven in court to be projecting? There's motive. **[Of course, that's aside from the irony - and optics - of Evans trying to escape sex pest legal problems with the help of a multibillionaire who asked to go "the wildest party" on Jeffrey Epstein's island.](https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/elon-musk/expressed-interest-visiting-jeffrey-epstein-island-emails-show-doj-rcna256784)** **Why is this a conflict of interest for Evans?** Tony McDonald's legal services and Musk's pockets mean they can tie Evans's personal legal problems up in court indefinitely, and that means she can focus on using the information, influence, resources, and assets of the Williamson County Republican Party to benefit Musk. One also wonders how that would be reported on campaign finance reports (probably an in-kind, but as Evans wasn't in office at the time, whether or not campaign donations could be used for legal issues is up in the air). **This means that a party chair (Evans) is accepting items or services of personal value from a constituent (Musk) who hopes to gain a return from her efforts as an elected official. Since the lawsuit is over her _personal_ actions, even if she tries to lie or claim otherwise, Musk paying for it would seem to constitute a conflict of interest with her role as party chair [and appears to possibly be bribery or pay-for-play under existing Texas law,](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bribery) but IANAL (however, IAAA).** **She could, of course, step down as party chair to resolve the conflict of interest, but we all know she won't.**

Nah, he's a pedophile. He allowed child p*** on his platform and then monetized it instead of removing it. He also lied about his extensive ties with Epstein, and how friendly they were "What day/night will be the wildest party on your island?” He also claimed Epstein was “obviously a creep” and claimed that Epstein “tried repeatedly to get me to visit his island. I declined.” They are outright lying, and they're all pedos. We've been reading accurately between the lines and through implications, who is in this pedo cabal. The truth will out, but until then I will remind everyone that Musk used child p********** to make money, and lied about his extensive and friendly relationship with a pedophile. Oh, and this was after Epstein's charge of soliciting a minor in 2008. Totally normal to hang out with a convinced child sex offender. Nothing to see here.

His girlfriend is an AI loli. 555-come-on-now

[deleted]

I do like that idea

I would think they’d have to. The EU and its’ nations are more reactive than the US legal system. Meaning, I would think if there is a judgement against him in the EU, and a bank would say, not cooperate: no more banking business in the EU. Even Leon doesn’t have the power to beat the international banking system; perhaps he could pick up a phone and ask Vladishmear how that’s going.

It sounds great inn theory. It will never happen. No one is risking WWIII to attack America for a few corrupt politicians. The Nurenberg Trials only happened because the country was already defeated.

> What does that have to do with letting Interpol arrest them and try them in a court in which they have no say. Interpol can arrest them, but the US can impose sanctions on everyone involved with their prosecution. You might think that it wouldn't do much damage but if they use services by companies in the US, like say, email or cloud accounts... they can have those shut down. Google and Microsoft will comply with any orders to do so immediately. Look at what they did to the Brazilian judge for daring to enforce the law against Jair Bolsonaro: https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0211

Having the biggest military in the world, coming and taking our cabinet members probably would be a death sentence.

Another thing that people should take note of, which has largely been unspoken about is the US law "American Service-Members Act" which asserts that if any US personnel are taken to The Hague for trial, the US will use any force, including military to retrieve them. Sounds like a country that views others as equal. Has somewhat less teeth these days. Trial 'em all.