ListNook

Pale_Sell1122 Mar 21, 2026 +548

Daily dose of Market Manipulation

548

Doppler74 Mar 21, 2026 +168

All the G7 countries will do is send harsh letters to Iran and give emotional support to US to open Straight of Hormuz.

168

Drak_is_Right Mar 22, 2026 +27

Likely they go keep the Houthis from closing that strait and the Red sea oil terminals so they can say they arent in the war but allow the US to focus on the Gulf. Saudis can maintain about 70% oil export rate through the Red Sea. So about 40% of the Persian Gulf oil will stay on the market. 55% if you count Iran's exports. Would mean the total deficit would be under 10m bbd

27

Catch_ME Mar 22, 2026 +5

Saudi Arabia needs to pipe that oil to the red sea from the east oil fields off the Gulf coast. Iran can target the pipeline and ruin that idea.

5

phatassgato Mar 23, 2026 +1

We can only hope.

1

Durian881 Mar 22, 2026 +22

Trump is already escalating, giving Iran 48 hours to reopen Strait of Hormuz and threathening to bomb Iran's power plants if they don't comply. This is his usual style to intimidate little girls and small companies. Unfortunately, he's dealing with countries now.

22

stubobarker Mar 22, 2026 +14

He’s just been handed a double-dare you. Iran says if its energy infrastructure is hit it will target desalination plants throughout the region. Just one large plant taken offline in Saudi Arabia would mean 8.5 million people would have to evacuate Riyadh within a week. What will taco do now?

14

youtheotube2 Mar 22, 2026 +11

He doesn’t care about the people of Riyadh

11

stubobarker Mar 22, 2026 +10

Yeah, but if he calls their bluff and our biggest ally in the region suffers such a humanitarian catastrophe, the repercussions would be enormous and the hole he’s dug would be even deeper. I’d be surprised if even trump is too stupid to realize this.

10

Vineyard_ Mar 22, 2026 +8

I wouldn't.

8

RespectmanNappa Mar 22, 2026 +2

To be fair, he probably sees this as Europe’s problem because of the refugee crisis it will cause. Thus why he has been trying to manipulate their buy in. But they largely understand it would be political su*cide to tie themselves to rising energy prices and to the cause of a new refugee crisis. It’s better to point to the idiocy of this whole fiasco then to try to stupidly de-escalate the consequences when it’s already too late

2

Scary_Outside2374 Mar 22, 2026 +2

Saudi has a mutual defense pact with Pakistan and Pakistan shares a land border with Iran, and has nukes. But the Persians are good people and not let the pedo win

2

Sayhei2mylittlefrnd Mar 22, 2026 +6

The US cannot keep it up. Much like the majority of the politicians

6

Frigoffwidit Mar 22, 2026 +14

It would be great if they could spend billions to waste missiles chasing ghosts in a desert and close the strait instead! Winning!

14

Mikelitoris88 Mar 22, 2026 +2

Get ready for the biggest concern unleashing in history

2

Lonely_Noyaaa Mar 21, 2026 +217

"Ready to act" is the most noncommittal thing you can say in a joint statement. Like okay great, what does that mean exactly. Ready to act when? Ready to do what? These things always sound serious until you read them twice.

217

D-MAN-FLORIDA Mar 21, 2026 +49

It’s like when they said they would help secure the strait but only when hostilities end.

49

YouCantSeeMe555 Mar 21, 2026 +46

Hey if America is so awesome you risk your boats first. Superman didn't wait for others to go first right?

46

DuskGideon Mar 22, 2026 +1

Yeah, they might as well not even bother, but i guess it costs money to keep ships deployed.

1

Killsheets Mar 21, 2026 -14

Just like with Ukraine. EU all is talk but no actual major commitments to shift something to their favor. Just bs status quo.

-14

Cautious_Proposal_47 Mar 22, 2026 +25

The best way to open the Straight of Hormuz is to end the war of aggression. It has nothing to do with Europe or NATO...not their fault, not their issue to fix.

25

off_by_two Mar 22, 2026 +18

Blaming the EU for this? Can you be more obviously a troll or bot?

18

Forgettheredrabbit Mar 22, 2026 +2

The EU has actually continued funding Ukraine’s defense effort even after the US halted contributions. They can’t deploy troops due to the nuclear threat Russia poses, but to say they’ve done nothing is a stretch.

2

Status_Winter Mar 22, 2026 +2

What does the EU have to do with this? The strait is closed to the US, Israel and now the UK. Not for us

2

lebenklon Mar 22, 2026 +18

I would be shocked if any other countries risk their sailors lives to police the straight to fix Trumps mistake. I would assume if anything happened to a European ship their governments would have a massive scandal with their public.

18

netizenbane Mar 22, 2026 +3

Indeed. "We express support" is light-years away from "we will support." The first is bluster, the second signals intent. Interesting the one that was used in this "joint statement."

3

RidingRedHare Mar 22, 2026 +1

Always ready to kiss Trump's butt without actually committing to anything.

1

Charlie_Mouse Mar 22, 2026 +7

This is called “diplomacy”. I can understand if you have difficulty recognising it because it’s been a scarce commodity where the Trump administration is concerned.

7

Wheelyjoephone Mar 22, 2026 +4

So not kissing Trumps ass?

4

HammerIsMyName Mar 22, 2026 +1

I'm ready to go to the gym. No clue when, but I'm ready. I've got my membership, I've got my gym clothes. All ready to act. All the statement says is "we are capable of acting"

1

Franklin_le_Tanklin Mar 22, 2026 +2

No. Think more like actors in a play. We’re “ready to act”

2

nhilante Mar 22, 2026 +1

All i can think of is a conceptual play where a dude ''acts'' as a potted plant on the background.

1

Olin_123 Mar 22, 2026 +19

Israel and America shouldn't have bombed them then. If the G7 cares about the security of the Hormuz strait, the best thing they could do is (somehow) get America/Israel to stop attacking Iran and admit that Iran has control of it.

19

FetusDrive Mar 21, 2026 +18

There is nothing new in this article that wasn’t said yesterday. No commitment to anything

18

HoratioPornBlower Mar 22, 2026 +15

I would be holding the US over a barrel. You want help cleaning up this mess, drop every tariff, give Ukraine everything they want, fund the UN, reaffirm NATO, publicly apologize for being the worlds biggest gobshites, etc.

15

Charlie_Mouse Mar 22, 2026 +3

Three issues with that unfortunately. Firstly that Americas word is worthless with Trump in charge. The second he reckons he could get away with it he’ll break his word. And everyone knows this. Secondly that Trump has not ever done anything that goes against Putin. As to the “why” that is theres a bunch of conjecture - but the fact is that to date that’s been his behaviour. And thirdly there’s the problem that the military ask here may not be possible. No matter who does it. Thanks to geography escorting anything through the straits is effectively a turkey-shoot. Trying to take enough Iranian territory to stop that would be even more of a meat grinder.

3

HoratioPornBlower Mar 22, 2026 +5

I’m with you, but just throwing the asks in his face might be enough to get him to pop a vein.

5

redelectro7 Mar 21, 2026 +292

Israel has blocked food and aid into Gaza for years and they did f*** all, but Hormuz Strait is blocked for a fortnight and watch them mobilise.

292

[deleted] Mar 21, 2026 +101

[deleted]

101

-SetsunaFSeiei- Mar 22, 2026 +10

Blocking the Hormuz Straight will send entire countries into a recession, that’s the real reason why all these countries are acting, when they stand by and watch Gaza from afar

10

FairyEnchantedDildo Mar 22, 2026 +14

Then all the countries should sanction Israel and the US to stop this war.

14

varitok Mar 21, 2026 -16

This is not just affecting the rich, it is affecting the poor and politicians dont want to lose elections based on gas prices

-16

Tuned4Tactics Mar 22, 2026 +19

Did I say its only affecting the rich?

19

Yeahjustchris Mar 21, 2026 -19

No, it's affecting everyone because it's shitting up the economy. Populist "its muh rich-people" slop talking point

-19

[deleted] Mar 22, 2026 +16

[deleted]

16

SYLOH Mar 22, 2026 +4

It's the standard for international politics. Millions of poor people starving and dying elsewhere -> I sleep. Your local economy affected -> Real shit!

4

Hollocho Mar 21, 2026 +8

Because without israel the US or Europe have no power in the middle east, that's why.

8

ProofByVerbosity Mar 22, 2026 +28

The Saudis and U.S. are pretty tight.

28

TrumpDesWillens Mar 22, 2026 +4

I think it's the other way.

4

Material_Ad_554 Mar 22, 2026 +9

Yeah right, are you forgetting the US bases all over the GCC

9

prettyokaycake Mar 21, 2026 +6

Yep. People don’t understand the actual historical reasons on why the US and the UK allowed Israel to exist. Israel is literally the laboratory of the United States for munitions and defense.

6

life_hacker_14 Mar 22, 2026 +10

people dont like the truth.

10

prettyokaycake Mar 22, 2026 +13

I mean I guess I get why people are downvoting it, but this is just objectively true. You can literally look at history.

13

perark05 Mar 22, 2026

Ironically Israel is supported as a balancing act against Iran, if the regime goes down then Israel as it is now is just a loose end

0

youtheotube2 Mar 22, 2026 +3

We were still Israel’s biggest supporter back when Iran was an ally before the Shah fell

3

goldenfiver Mar 21, 2026 -64

Why is it always about Gaza for you folks? Like, why can’t you isolate things?

-64

umonoz Mar 21, 2026 +19

Because it's prime example of western cruelty and hypocrisy. Not that we lacked any before but more recent and solid. We watched a genocide happening live from our screens and people who comitted/supported it are preaching stuff like: > unjustifiable attacks Plus attacking a country when you're unprovoked and bitching about retaliation of them is kinda... I don't know a word for it.

19

goldenfiver Mar 22, 2026 -6

What genocide were you watching? Because I saw terrorists butchering families on facebook live during the seventh of October

-6

umonoz Mar 22, 2026 +15

The one here International Association of Genocide Scholars mention: https://genocidescholars.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/IAGS-Resolution-on-Gaza-FINAL.pdf

15

Apprehensive-Tea999 Mar 22, 2026 +7

How many dead Gazans do you need before you appease your bloodlust and feel your revenge is complete?? 1000 to one work for you? Do kids count as half, because they’re small, or double, because you’re obliterating generations? I’m just curious when it’ll be enough.

7

redelectro7 Mar 21, 2026 +22

Why does something happening in the Middle East as a result of a country commiting atrocities in Gaza make me think of Gaza? ETA: Nevermind checked your posts.

22

goldenfiver Mar 21, 2026 -12

As a result of what? It has nothing to do with Gaza, which happened as a response to what Gazans did on October seventh by starting a war with Israel.

-12

redelectro7 Mar 21, 2026 +23

Israel bombed Gaza two weeks before 7th October. Why wasn't that starting a war? Is it like the war they started with Iran when they claimed they didn't start it even though they attacked?

23

Ballders Mar 21, 2026 +11

Acting like it all started on Oct 6 instead of as the result of everything leading up. You can only push people so far.

11

goldenfiver Mar 22, 2026 -5

I love how you bring up the whole date thing. On Oct 6th there was a ceasefire. Hamas started the war on Oct 7th. R***, torture and killing of unarmed Israeli civilians, including their pets in some cases is what followed. As for “you can only push people so far” guess what? They pushed Israelis too far.

-5

kolkitten Mar 22, 2026 +7

A ceasefire from Israel bombing gaza you moron

7

kolkitten Mar 21, 2026 +33

Because it's not isolated? It's all connected.

33

euthan_asian Mar 21, 2026 +28

If you pause to think for just one moment, you can probably see a connection or two between the situations...

28

PoliticsIsDepressing Mar 21, 2026 +24

Because the entire world aren’t idiots, Bibibot.

24

tpeeeezy Mar 21, 2026 -5

then why did the g7 just team up with trump and israel?

-5

off_by_two Mar 22, 2026 +3

They havent. They havent committed to any action quite the opposite

3

PoliticsIsDepressing Mar 22, 2026 +4

Because they need oil/gas. Don’t think too hard.

4

youtheotube2 Mar 22, 2026 +1

Because the world still runs on oil and it has to keep flowing

1

goldenfiver Mar 21, 2026 -14

Can’t reply to my comment so you so straight for calling me a bot? Says more about you, honestly.

-14

off_by_two Mar 22, 2026 +3

Israel is the catalyst for this war, why are you denying that?

3

Spacekeleton Mar 22, 2026 -8

Gaza is terrorist state

-8

CuckBuster33 Mar 22, 2026 -1

maybe because the oil supply is critical to our countries

-1

whowhodillybar Mar 21, 2026 +147

> "We ... express support to our partners in the region in the face of the unjustifiable attacks by the Islamic Republic of Iran ‌and ⁠its proxies," the ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the ⁠United States, as well as the top EU diplomat, said in a ⁠statement. Umm. What made Iran do this? They just start doing this out of the blue? Or did something or someone provoke this? Perhaps the US should not have attacked fist?

147

StretchExtension Mar 21, 2026 +61

Holding the hegemon accountable?? In today's world order?

61

NekoCatSidhe Mar 22, 2026 +15

It’s funny watching all those politicians tie themselves in knots to pretend this is all Iran’s fault for being attacked, somehow, because Iran is not following their made-up rules that their opponents are also not following. But also sad, because it shows that despite Trump spending all his second term insulting and attacking and betraying his allies and the war being against their countries interests, they are still too spineless to really stand up to him.

15

[deleted] Mar 21, 2026 +37

[deleted]

37

Damnatus_Terrae Mar 22, 2026 +3

And also remember that Trump et al. have only made this more visible. It's not new.

3

tierciel Mar 21, 2026 +20

The only unjustifiable attacks I've seen reported were carried out by the US and Israel. Unless the global media has been covering up other attacks by Iran those ministers can get bent. I am quite ashamed of my countries government right now.

20

[deleted] Mar 22, 2026 +1

[removed]

1

Kapparzo Mar 22, 2026 +4

The famous western hypocrisy strikes again!

4

YouCantSeeMe555 Mar 21, 2026 -44

That's correct it didn't come out of the blue. Iran has supported Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis and Russia in attacking civilians, murdering during October 7th and other attacks. Attacking shipping in the red sea all while trying to create nuclear weapons. What made Iran do all that?

-44

StretchExtension Mar 21, 2026 +52

\-Be the west \-Exploit another developing nation's natural resources \-Overthrow a democratically elected leader who wants the nationalization of said resources \-Proceed to lose the petrostate due to a popular uprising \-Economically choke out the same country for the following 48 years \-Why are they extremists? Why do they hate us? 🤯🤯🤯

52

MentalSky_ Mar 21, 2026 +17

The CIA

17

Slick424 Mar 22, 2026 +4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat follower by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_sanctions_against_Iran#Sanctions_of_1979 The US is f****** Iran nonstop for over 70 years.

4

YouCantSeeMe555 Mar 22, 2026 +1

So you attack the Jews because of an American thing 70 years ago. Got it.

1

Slick424 Mar 22, 2026 +1

The US killed millions of Iraqis and Afghans for something a small group of Saudis did. >70 years ago Not 70 years ago, **for** 70 years. Big difference.

1

YouCantSeeMe555 Mar 22, 2026 +1

Uh no they didn't and lying doesn't help your case but also why are they killing the Jews if this was about the US? Key Casualty Figures (Direct Deaths): Total Direct Deaths: 479,858 — 507,236 (Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan). Iraq (2003–2018): 182,272 — 204,575 civilians killed. Afghanistan (2001–2018): 38,480 civilians killed. U.S. Military Deaths: Over 7,000 U.S. service members died in both operations combined. Contractor Deaths: Over 7,800 U.S. contractors died.

1

Slick424 Mar 23, 2026 +1

Oh, it's just half a million. Never mind then, I guess. >also why are they killing the Jews if this was about the US? My point is that when people get hurt, they lash out and often it's not only the people responsible that get hit. Especially when the Netanyahu regime calls any criticism of Israel anti-semitism and thereby insinuates that Jew and Israeli is the same thing. Iran is on the receiving end of a non-stop beating be the US and it's allies for over 70 years. PS: [Iraq study estimates war-related deaths at 461,000](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-24547256)

1

YouCantSeeMe555 Mar 23, 2026 +1

Uh no they haven't. As you say when people get hurt they lash out and October 7th caused Israel to set all this in motion because of the depravity of what everyone saw. Iran brought this on themselves.

1

Slick424 Mar 23, 2026 +1

>Uh no they haven't. As you say when people get hurt they lash out and October 7th caused Israel to set all this in motion because of the depravity of what everyone saw. Now you get it. All you need to do now is remember that the conflict didn't start on October 7th. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakba >Iran brought this on themselves. So you are saying the US brought 9/11 on themselves? Did Israel brought October 7th on themselves? By your justice, everyone dies.

1

YouCantSeeMe555 Mar 23, 2026 +1

Yes I get it you all hate Israel and want to kill them all blah blah blah.

1

Far-Maintenance-1947 Mar 22, 2026 +2

The West literally staged a coup and installed these people in Iran decades ago.

2

dweeegs Mar 22, 2026 +7

Totally backwards, the guys the US installed were overthrown by the regime they’re still in today

7

YouCantSeeMe555 Mar 22, 2026 +4

No actually it was the other way around the previous people were put in power by the West then the Islamic Revolution came and these guys took over.

4

WinterSector8317 Mar 21, 2026 +58

Hypocrisy Based International Order

58

baseketball Mar 22, 2026 -1

I say it's more humiliation based. Everyone's a f****** p****, it's just that Trump has the biggest stick.

-1

freit4z Mar 21, 2026 +65

I can't believe we are going for WW3 because some settlers think they are "chosen".

65

Drak_is_Right Mar 22, 2026 -23

This isnt getting us closer to WW3.

-23

DylanfromSales Mar 22, 2026 +12

The world going to war for a third time isn't getting us closer to WW3?

12

McCoy818 Mar 21, 2026 +26

wild how fast the g7 can mobilize when oil is at risk but humanitarian crises get strongly worded letters for months

26

Namika Mar 22, 2026 +19

Hundreds of thousands have been killed in Sudan the last two years. Thousands more every week. You won't even find a single sentence mentioning it in a newspaper today.

19

TrumpDesWillens Mar 22, 2026 +6

Mostly because the Sudanese Civil War is funded by Western Allies like the UAE.

6

Obscure_Occultist Mar 22, 2026 +4

Simple answers. Voters don't give a f*** about humanitarian crisis. People claim they do but their votes says otherwise. Gas, Energy, Inflation? Thats the kind of shit that hits the home front. That's what voters actually care about, and therefore what politicians care about.

4

Crowsnest_Bomber Mar 21, 2026 +74

Say what you want about the Iranian Regime, but unjustifiable attacks is a bit of a stretch. Havent they been hit by something like 7,000 missiles?

74

FriedRice2682 Mar 22, 2026 +18

If you only account for Israeli strikes and go back to the beginning of the 12 day war, that would be [8k](https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-evening-special-report-march-3-2026/#:~:text=leadership.%5B28%5D-,US%20and%20Israeli%20Air%20Campaign,%2Dday%20war.%5B33%5D) As for the US about [5k](https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/IN12668.html#:~:text=U.S.%20Capabilities%20Expended%20in%20Operation,struck%20more%20than%205%2C000%20targets.) So about 13k missiles

18

ConformistWithCause Mar 22, 2026 +5

Something like that. They've been hit with enough that I almost agree with their mentality of needing a nuke to defend themselves. Give them 1 nuke to hold as a deterrent, but if they turn around and drop it on India, then they have nobody to blame but themselves

5

youtheotube2 Mar 22, 2026 +3

Lmao Pakistan is the country that hates India

3

off_by_two Mar 22, 2026 +5

Im pretty sure Iran has a fatwa against producing and using nukes

5

NekoCatSidhe Mar 22, 2026 +9

…but now the fatwa is no longer valid because they killed the guy who wrote it at the beginning of the war. Not that I believe for even one second that the real goal of this war was ever to stop Iran from acquiring nukes, this is just an excuse, and one they already used for Iraq.

9

ConformistWithCause Mar 22, 2026

Maybe, and my comment was more hyperbole/cheekiness than a genuine thought or opinion. Plus, I thought that was like a legitimate goal of theirs, but their extremism/fanaticism, for lack of a better vocabulary/insight, is why the rest of the world/us keep setting them back

0

plightro Mar 21, 2026 +31

WACO World always chickens out. Totally get why non-Americans are pissed that Americans keep capitulating to trump's bullshit all the time, but the reality is that the whole world eventually just sighs and goes along with any shit the US decides to pull even if they initially say they won't

31

sjogren Mar 21, 2026 +9

The entire world bends for Trump. It enables him and his behavior.

9

itsinvincible Mar 21, 2026 +6

Lmao they didn't commit to anything. Just agreed that safeguarding maritime routes is important including the strait of hormuz. That's like me saying ifs important we get all Heroin addicts weaned of the drugs. And then just do nothing about it. Stop being so pessimistic Europe will never join in this senseless war they just keeping up appearance with the USA.

6

plightro Mar 21, 2026 +3

You're way too confident but I still hope you're right

3

tpeeeezy Mar 21, 2026 +8

imma come back to this comment in a week

8

itsinvincible Mar 21, 2026

Sure do.

0

Armthedillos5 Mar 22, 2026 +3

We are ready to act. Will you act? No. Will you think about acting? Yah, sure. But you won't actually do anything? Correct.But In the strongest terms!

3

StretchExtension Mar 21, 2026 +10

yap yap yap... miss me with the c**** market manipulation. They keep making these broad statements, remind me when they actually do something.

10

KingMario05 Mar 21, 2026 +8

Good job, Trump. Now your new forever war is the *West's* forever war. F****** idiot.

8

plainwrap Mar 22, 2026 +3

They're all going to look stupid next year when they're debating whether to admit Iran into the G8. There's no better demonstration of a nation joining the 'Big Kids Table' than being able to threaten the world economy and fight a superpower to a stalemate. The nukes are just a formality at this point.

3

ebutv6 Mar 22, 2026 +5

where is the board of peace ???

5

orangesuave Mar 22, 2026 +2

That was just a fundraiser for him.

2

YesterShill Mar 21, 2026 +5

Did they release a statement condemning bombing a school? Or do they only care when the economy is impacted.

5

GeshtiannaSG Mar 22, 2026 +2

The Strait of Hormuz has been secure for decades, why does it need security now?

2

boogermanjack Mar 22, 2026 +2

To be black mailed by a minor government with no country to ruin the rest of the world 🌍

2

Impressive_Box4144 Mar 22, 2026 +2

Do something about Trump

2

DrFrankenpoof69 Mar 22, 2026 +2

Ah yes. The idiot doctrine

2

cosmicaith Mar 22, 2026 +2

Gonna drag everyone into his mess

2

ViolettaQueso Mar 22, 2026 +1

Remember no blood for oil??

1

Blubbolo Mar 22, 2026 +2

The mightiest navy in the world refused to go there and do that, at least that was what was reported. The G7 (-1) won't send ships to be sitting ducks to c**** as f*** drones. The US elected a child rapist moron and the world is paying the consequences. The only way to open that strait is to own the entirety of the Iranian coast, which will never happens. Good jobs. The entire world, dressed in a suit, would like to say "thank you" to the US.

2

Awesomegcrow Mar 22, 2026 +1

Unless you're ready to go to war for Israel and America benefit, think carefully.

1

Randomwhitelady2 Mar 22, 2026 +1

We have now entered the era of the Oil and Gas Wars. Looks like countries that have reduced their dependence on these energy sources will ultimately come out ahead.

1

Global-Ad-722 Mar 22, 2026 +2

So you are saying that a country that didn’t prioritize non-oil and gas energy sources and even cut EV incentives and bragged about adding fossil fuel capacity might be less prepared for a long protracted energy war. Hhhmmm….

2

Randomwhitelady2 Mar 22, 2026 +1

I think you are onto something there!

1

ron2838 Mar 22, 2026 +1

>"We ... express support to our partners in the region in the face of the unjustifiable attacks by the Islamic Republic of Iran ‌and ⁠its proxies," the ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the ⁠United States, as well as the top EU diplomat, said in a ⁠statement. That statement doesnt match the headline.

1

Lettuce_bee_free_end Mar 23, 2026 +1

Oh so g7 is security of oil. Ah I thought it was for better things.

1

skaggmattik Mar 21, 2026 +1

Welcome to WW3. Damn

1

KenBoCole Mar 22, 2026

Not now I think. Russia and China are willing to expend resources to weaken the US specifically, if the G7 actually mobilize, than at least China will back down, China needs the G7 countries for trade

0

sardouk97 Mar 21, 2026 +1

falling in line like a bunch of good dogs

1

SnarkyPuppy-0417 Mar 22, 2026 +1

They've decided to protect Iran from Israeli/ American aggression?

1

snapchillnocomment Mar 22, 2026 +1

Its just wild how quickly Carney went from giving a viral speech about how we shouldn't keep buying into American hegemony to whatever this is.

1

Equivalent_Range6291 Mar 22, 2026

Donald seems to be moving to a position of all out War against the Iranian people, he\`s stated on Camera in a matter of a few hours he will attack civilian infrastructure & facilities, he\`s claimed that his next first strikes will be on civilian power stations & de-salination plants, the Man who keeps repeatedly tells us about his great love for the Iranian people now appears to want to "knock them back into the stone age." Whaowee Donald thats a groovy kind of love? .. fcukin nutter. We should be surprised i suppose, we already know he\`s a psychotic murderer .. On day one to show his love for the Iranian people he blew the arms & legs of 165 of them. All Primary School Girls. All obviously innocent .. All of them Dead. All Dead. .. (This amazing love of the Iranian people was brought to you by "Call Me Daddy!" Donald. + + +

0

derzt1 Mar 21, 2026 -5

Going to enjoy the fake outrage now that the developed world is openly backing the US against Iran. What else was to be expected after attacking the GCC and threatening the oil market? Same mistake Saddam made in 1991. Funny enough, eating the US-Israeli bombs and not doing anything would’ve been a better strategy. Terror mullahs are fucked now 😂

-5

Th1rte3n1334 Mar 22, 2026 +2

This statement is purely posturing. Nothing will be done. Like smh, how do you not know this by now.

2

derzt1 Mar 22, 2026 -1

Just yesterday, coping fools claimed that the international community won’t back the air strikes. Now they’re openly supporting Iran getting bombed. Iran pushed the right buttons and it shows 😂

-1

D-MAN-FLORIDA Mar 21, 2026 -1

They committed to nothing in the statement. What’s the point of posting this?

-1

E5VL Mar 22, 2026

The Call is coming within the house. I was surprised America was involved in this statement at all.

0

-SineNomine- Mar 22, 2026

In other words: G7 backs war of aggression. Enough said

0

3p2p Mar 22, 2026

Epstein files are really bad, Hormuz/us/iran war was a distraction. Bailing out Trump is dumb. G7 should merely tell Trump to sign a deal with Iran to stop this as he created a problem and told no one he was doing it.

0

G7 ready to act to protect global energy supplies, backs Hormuz Strait security

💬 Send a Message

154 Comments