Ukraine did this the whole time and AFAIK no country ever said something against this practice. Also it doesn't sound like Merz wants to send Ukrainian men back.
17
[deleted]4 days ago
+9
[deleted]
9
yvesp904 days ago
+6
The Eierlecker just wants cannon fodder, and he knows it's easier to do it to Ukrainians than Germans, with how that's backfiring there. Germany has less than 50% homeownership, and mfs think people will fight for "their land."
6
CuriousButNotJewish4 days ago
+2
Where does egg licker for Merz come from? never heard it before
2
yvesp904 days ago
+4
It was a student in a demonstration against Wehrpflicht and held a sign saying "Merz Leck Eier"
Guess what happened to the kid
4
korndaweizen4 days ago
+2
He.... No.... Did Merz actually....? No way! Damn this licker and his egghouses!
2
CuriousButNotJewish3 days ago
+1
Arrested? For saying Merz is... gay?
1
yvesp903 days ago
+2
Harassed, sued, and intimidated by defamation accusations. They're 18yo, by the way.
2
Secure_Activity49444 days ago
+4
Merz can lick some eggs
4
AfroNin4 days ago
+17
As a German, this has me DEEPLY worried lmao
17
nnm_UA3 days ago
+8
I am a Ukrainian software engineer living in Hungary at the moment. I was planning on moving to the Western EU and Germany in particular, but it's very clear that I am not welcome. No hate to you guys, though.
8
Hecex1 day ago
+1
Thats crazy, knowing how the state propaganda was spewing anti-Ukranian bullshit until a few days ago (when the fat pig lost the elections), im curious if this have impacted your life here?
1
nnm_UA1 day ago
+1
First and foremost, I'm grateful to the country for accepting me to live here temporarily.
The state propaganda posters were genuinely funny but did not affect my daily life. However, the effects were certainly noticeable. Even though I live in an immigrant bubble, I encountered many hostile ruzzians, emboldened by the official government position. I saw a number of ruzzian soldiers too, including an actual Wagner mercenary; paramilitary cosplayers dressing up as ruzzian soldiers at Comic Con with Ukrainian flags/symbolic being forbidden, etc.
In general, I can say that most Hungarian people that I met were against the Orban government and somewhat sympathetic to Ukraine. With that being said, the number of Ukrainian flags in Budapest is close to zero. I know it might sound like a weird metric of support, but I was shocked by how many of them I saw in other countries, like the Czech Republic or Germany. Ordinary people were displaying them to show support. Not a thing in Hungary, though.
1
EpsteinFile_011 day ago
+2
In Western Europe it's the other way around. Except for the hostility. Ukrainian communities living in peace, Ruzzian lone wolves hiding their identity to strangers out of shame. Russian flag? LOL you probably wouldn't be attacked but people would definitely look at you like they want to kill you.
2
EpsteinFile_011 day ago
+1
You're already in the EU though, this does not apply to you.
1
Throwawayaccountdell4 days ago
+81
Men have a right to seek safety too! It is disgusting that simply because of their gender they get discriminated against and denied the ability to seek refuge. Either everyone has a right to seek refuge or everyone including eligible women have a duty to help out their country of Ukraine.
81
EndOfDecadence4 days ago
+142
Everyone talks about equality until the draft starts. Lol.
142
Throwawayaccountdell4 days ago
+28
Lots of countries like Norway, Denmark and Sweden have mandatory service for women and it works well. There is no reason for a discriminatory draft if it continues to be in place. Either allow men to seek refuge or require eligible women to be required to help out their country.
28
PlasticGooner3 days ago
+10
We do not have mandatory service for women in Denmark wtf are you talking about
Edit: apparently we changed this in 2025, I stand corrected
10
NielsSm0ker3 days ago
+9
Jo vi har, det blev indført i 2025
9
PlasticGooner3 days ago
+1
Shit fair nok 😅 har boet i udlandet de sidste 3 år så har ikke følt med! Egentligt ret nice
1
Illustrious-Source-52 days ago
+1
In Norway, we have to many volunteers, so the army only takes those who really expressed a desire to go. So there is no real mandatory. If you want, you get to skip. Peacetime is nice
1
Throwawayaccountdell1 day ago
+1
I am aware of that i was just referring how the law in Norway is genderless rather then the discriminatory law they have in Ukraine.
1
ericdalieux4 days ago
-6
One good practical reason to not send women to war is to not risk leaving many more children orphaned. And, being very practical and putting all the equality talks aside, having civilian women in your army is really not worth much. I do support the right of every man to choose not to take a bullet for their country.
-6
CuriousButNotJewish4 days ago
+7
Single parents are already exempt.
7
ericdalieux4 days ago
+1
Is a woman whose husband is currently at war considered a single parent?
1
Throwawayaccountdell4 days ago
+6
You could just exempt parents from serving if that is your concern. In general having women serving and doing mandatory service just like men is beneficial since the more people that are trained the more people you have to be able to defend the country.
6
therealallpro4 days ago
+22
I’m glad ppl are realizing slow all the ways men have “invisible labor” it’s so publicized all the ways women have disadvantages but ironically all the ways they benefit from society “well that’s just the way it is”
The truth is ppl don’t want to change. So it’s going to be uneven forever
22
EpsteinFile_011 day ago
+1
Men also had all the power. Even if only at home.
Men lost the power, kept the labor.
1
Kondikteur4 days ago
-8
Ok, what about the countries where there is no draft or no war?
-8
therealallpro4 days ago
+9
They are lucky… sometimes ppl don’t face systems of oppression but they still exist
9
Working-Message45044 days ago
-39
Go away Ruzzian incel
-39
Throwawayaccountdell4 days ago
+17
I'm not Russian nor support them you loser! Why do you support discrimination in the law???
17
TrumpBad_UpvotesPls4 days ago
-3
Go fight in Ukraine bigot
-3
CuriousButNotJewish4 days ago
+49
How disgusting. Women should be under the same laws.
49
External-Praline-4514 days ago
+12
Why not leave it up to the Ukrainians? I suspect a lot of them don't want their wives, daughters and girlfriends to fight, especially if there are kids to look after. Some women are already fighting, too.
12
big_dart2 days ago
+6
It is only fair that more duty implies more rights. And that's not the road to equalty.
6
EpsteinFile_011 day ago
+1
Have you ever been in contact with the military? They are not police, they do not f*** around lmao. It's like Australian wildlife, don't get too close and definitely don't touch them orthe best case scenario is you will have assault rifles pointed at you (I'm trying to give Kangaroos a new idea).
You get the right to bear arms and kill other humans while having priority and authority (when deployed) over the civilian population. In some countries the military is the best way to guarantee food for you and your family. I am assuming Ukrainian soldiers 25km+ behind the front lines eat better than the average civilian, but I'm not sure.
...yeah okay that's a pretty shitty deal but if your country is invaded by a horde of literal f****** HIVtards I genuinely consider it an honorable job, may all Ukrainian veterans get a supplemental income for the rest of their lives so they don't have to grind as hard, they've done their job.
No joke HIV is rampant in the Russian military. As is a*** sex. But they are anti LGBT. They only want the G.
1
big_dart1 day ago
+2
As a conscripted man the best deal you can get out of war is going back to your pre war ordinary life. I'd rather f*** off to another not-at-war country and live my ordinary life there.
2
EpsteinFile_011 day ago
+1
Of course. Unfortunately the social contract is that you can live safely and prosper in a country, but when it's invaded you are expected to defend it. It HAS to be that way, otherwise countries like Russia would just invade whoever they want, if all the men would always just run away.
A country is really just one big tribe. If my country is attacked and I am drafted, I will hate it but accept it. It's the only way countries can exist at all.
I wish you the best.
1
External-Praline-4512 days ago
-4
Fair according to you, and all the armchair Listnook commenters that want to make decisions about how other countries run things...yeah seriously stay in your lane and let them get on with serious matters.
-4
CuriousButNotJewish3 days ago
+9
Everybody wants someone else in their country to fight against Russia and defend Ukraine, but nobody wants to be the one themselves that fights Russia and defends Ukraine.
Most Ukrainians are against surrendering to Russia, if you were wondering.
9
External-Praline-4513 days ago
+3
Yes I know they're against surrendering. But you're the one who wants to make decisions for them.
3
CuriousButNotJewish3 days ago
Nah, I support Ukrainians in their war financially, logistically, and in every other way that's not being on the frontlines myself. I think I have the right to suggest how conscription should change, given that they're happy enough to continue the war until victory.
0
PrrrromotionGiven13 days ago
+1
If you could just buy a stake in another country's domestic policy then Putin probably would have bought the whole country out lmao, cheaper than the war at least
If you aren't a citizen of Ukraine then no, you don't have that right.
1
CuriousButNotJewish2 days ago
+1
I don't have a right to choose, but my time and money and connection network brought you some of Ukraine's foreign legion fighters to Lviv for training so respectfully, I have a right to say whatever I want on the internet. Don't be a c*** and bite the hand that feeds you, I supported your army even though I have no obligation to do, least you can do is show some respect in return. Slava Ukraini, but don't be a c***.
1
Fuckkoff-3 days ago
But you sure have the right to have an opinion about. Especially considering it's our taxmoney that's paying for your war
0
PrrrromotionGiven13 days ago
+4
"Your war"? I'm from the UK.
You have an imperialist mindset.
Everyone has the right to have an opinion about anything, so it was only natural for me to assume you meant an actual stake in decision-making.
4
ConversationNovel1662 days ago
+1
Then stop paying for "our" war. We’ll meet in the trenches in your country, it seems that’s exactly what you want. I wonder how Europe, which can’t even shoot down drones and isn’t preparing for war at all, will cope with the invasion. For some reason, you tend to think that Ukraine isn’t the country that is literally protecting you from war. Well, given the current situation, it seems you’ll have a chance to realise this in the future
1
CuriousButNotJewish2 days ago
+3
Don't be a petty child. All of Europe is in this, Europe supports Ukraine logistically and financially, and we support you also on all your territorial claims, including Crimea. Being an ass to people online and telling them the equivalent of a child going "fine! I didn't want to play with you anyway!" when we both know Ukraine and Europe both need each other, does nothing more than antagonise public opinion on Ukraine further, needlessly. Russia is also doing an informational war on the internet to poison minds agains Ukrainians, don't play into their games. Make foreigners love Ukraine, not hate it.
3
Fuckkoff-2 days ago
I wish I could. And I´m not worried about russia showing up anytime soon. Maybe your country should have respected its own russian oriented population a bit more....
0
NationalisticMemes3 days ago
+2
No, let them go home to us and be in the same boat with everyone else.
2
Ok-Can-93748 hr ago
+1
I think the Ukrainians you’re talking about don’t want themselves to fight either…
1
Special_Region46753 days ago
-1
Maybe because Germany should be a progessive equal state and not support sending away immigrants knowing they will be used to be killed as cannon fodder? Derp?
-1
Possible-Fudge-22173 days ago
+2
Well Germany just decided to reinstate a law that demands any man below the age of 45 who wants to travel abroad for more than 3 months to contact the army and request permission. Sadly Germany doesn't give an f about equality, at least not the current governement.
2
Wiltermerh3 days ago
+3
Not request permission but to inform. Slight difference huh?
3
Possible-Fudge-22173 days ago
+4
Not quite. On surface it may look like just informing them as in theory they cannot deny your request if your are not to serve within that timespan. So for now the request will be permitted by default (same as during the cold war). But if this truly were trivial you wouldn't have it at all. Instead 2029 you can take a look how giving that inch can be abused by a potential and quite likely black blue coalition.
4
Special_Region46752 days ago
+5
Nope. You are misinformed, they must ask for **approval** AKA **permission** to leave the country.
5
-_LordOfTheBings_-4 days ago
+2
I think you should think about why your kneejerk reaction is "women should suffer too!" as opposed to "this should happen to nobody"
2
CuriousButNotJewish3 days ago
+13
The draft's purpose isn't to make anyone man or woman suffer. It's to ensure the safety of your homeland and that you still are free and not enslaved to Nazi Germany or Russia or North Korea or China or whatever your local dictatorial neighbour is, when they invade you. It's a necessary evil, defending a country is part of our duty as the citizens of a society from whom we get benefits.
If you as a woman don't want to defend the society you live in, please stop receiving medical support, days off, stop using the roads, the parks, or any other public facilities that were built by the society you live in, go far away in the forest and live your anarchist dream there, where you don't owe anyone and nobody owes you anything.
If however, you would like to keep living in a free society where you're not forced to speak Russian, where you can vote for your mayor, representative, and so on, where you can use the roads and public facilities built by your fellow country man, then I don't care what's in your pants - you have as much a duty to defend that society as every other able-bodied citizen living in it.
13
EpsteinFile_011 day ago
+1
Everyone whose country is not actively being invaded and destroyed should really shut the F up about draft laws. These people think they know how they would respond if Russians marched into their country with meat assaults. They don't. They also don't know how their country as a whole would respond, which greatly affects their personal response. If nobody fights, you probably won't fight either. If everybody fights, you are emboldened to fight too, even if outnumbered, because with a million men on your side, you will feel very powerful, even if the enemy has five million men, because our brains can't comprehend the scale (and leadership would try to downplay enemy numbers to keep up morale). Plus you don't want to be the only little b**** hiding with the women and children, something that can follow you for the rest of your life, might as well tattoo it on your forehead. Shame is an extremely effective motivator for all humans.
The Ukrainian Armed Forces are doing the most honourable job in the world right now, and for Europeans, the most important job too. People think their lives are bad now, "hurt durr billions to Ukraine and I have to sacrifice one of my two holidays per year?!" Yeah and if Russia had annexed Ukraine without incurring so much pain, your next holiday would be a government funded one to Eastern Europe. Europe was NOT prepared for any kind of combat, if Ukrathad fallen in 2022, Russia might have pushed into Europe after trump's election, and Trump would essentially veto American support to NATO allies.
These people should be glad the EU is not one entity yet (we're going there) because the next time Russians attack, which is guaranteed to happen, all European militaries will get involved. Depending on how desperate Russia is, Europeans may be drafted.
China is eyeballing Siberia, it's inevitable, they are already silently colonizing it through migration and businesses. Millions of Russians will go west where they aren't a minority, and because of this war there's plenty of space and work for them in western Russia. If Russia totally fails as a state (again), it's not at all unthinkable that some crazy f****** Russian leader gives weapons to millions of angry men and says "look, there is wealth, food, and women in Europe and they are unarmed and weak, ripe for the taking, go forth and whatever you take is yours to keep, for Mother Russia! URRAH!" while publicly claiming it's not a military and these Madmen are out of their control sorry guys! Imagine the EU getting zerged by a couple million armed bandits like a reverse operation Barbarossa from Temu..
Sounds crazy? Well it literally happened before, many times even. So it can happen again. People born in modern nation states just have a hard time imagining it. A viking army roamed, pillaged and raped Britain for THIRTEEN YEARS before finally being subdued. That's a long f****** time on an island you can walk across in a matter of days.
1
DefiantRaspberry1614 days ago
-33
No. There should be no draft. Why force more people into something? I am glad at least women aren't being forced to fight.
-33
aaazzzdeeeduuulaaa4 days ago
+27
Because otherwise their country will not be sovereign anymore? Hello?
27
todddepri4 days ago
+8
Hello? It's for the population to decide if they want to fight, not for the government.
8
Existing_Increase_874 days ago
+5
Yes and the population has said yes, if they didn't they would have abolished conscription because it's a f****** democracy. People decide
5
JustyourZeratul3 days ago
+3
Actually not. You are right from one point of view but only in general. If you look at the actual law, you see it's very easy to evade the draft in many absolutely legal ways.
So the actual draft is performed as a press gang and it is absolutely illegal. So your logic isn't applied here.
3
Existing_Increase_873 days ago
+1
That's the fault of the implementation. They should plug the gaps
1
JustyourZeratul3 days ago
+1
They are not gonna do it. Authorities just regularly break the law. So you are wrong here.
1
Existing_Increase_873 days ago
+1
Wrong how? Wanting authorities to follow the law they set?
1
JustyourZeratul3 days ago
+1
But if they followed the law, everybody could easily evade the draft, so the obligatory military service wouldn't exist as a thing.
1
aaazzzdeeeduuulaaa3 days ago
+3
Actually this is a great point
3
confidentlyfish2 days ago
+1
This is actually wrong.
1
aaazzzdeeeduuulaaa4 days ago
+5
Not how martial law works, fortunately or unfortunately. As rosy and idealistic as your stance is, this reasoning leads to the conclusion that Ukraine should become Russian. Without the nation state, which is administrated by the government, there is no country. At least in the modern sense. Look at the Kurds...
5
CuriousButNotJewish4 days ago
+5
There are so many example of "peaceful" people being repeatedly massacred because they're shit at fighting to defend themselves. Look no further than the Yazidis.
5
DefiantRaspberry1613 days ago
+1
Yeah I'm aware of what the consequences are. But I would never fight or die for my or any country. So I would never demand that from anybody else. And people only have this one live. Forcing them to fight and die is just extremely cruel to me.
1
Farronski4 days ago
+1
Yes, and if I, the citizens of the attacked country, say: "I don't care if my country is sovereign, I want to live." This should be my decision.
Yes, this is not how martial law works, but when someone criticizes a law saying "but that's the law" is not a valid counterargument.
1
CuriousButNotJewish3 days ago
+5
You should be exiled from the country and have your citizenship stripped from you, if you day that when your country gets invaded.
5
Farronski3 days ago
-1
My duty to my country is paid for in taxes, not blood.
I don't understand how people would rather die for their country than just live somewhere else.
-1
CuriousButNotJewish3 days ago
+5
Your taxes are like a subscription service for continuing to live in the society, your passport and citizenship imply a duty to defend it. Or you can hand that passport in and be like any immigrant residing in your country legally - they don't have a duty to serve in case of war, after all.
5
JustyourZeratul3 days ago
+1
It doesn't work that way usually. You can't just give in citizenship.
1
Farronski3 days ago
To be honest, if there were a system to renounce your citizenship but you keep a neutral passport with roughly the same visa requirements as your old one - I fail to see the downside. Until then, I can't hand in my passport, since I need it for travel.
0
Jerri_man3 days ago
+4
Living somewhere else is a privilege not a guarantee
4
Farronski3 days ago
Yes, sure, but I would want to try to exhaust this option before joining the meat grinder.
0
moe_lester6900003 days ago
+5
if everyone was p**** like you nazis would have won
5
Farronski3 days ago
-2
Maybe, maybe there would have been enough volunteers.
I don't care, I wouldn't die for my country. If that makes me a p**** in your eyes, so be it. But in my eyes you're just a useful idiot for the arms industry and their beneficiaries.
-2
moe_lester6900003 days ago
+3
we have Russia in our borders I don't want to end up like Ukraine
3
JustyourZeratul3 days ago
You can always volunteer.
0
yvesp904 days ago
-2
The Kurds got fucked due to imperialist re-maping of regions, not because they wanted to "surrender"
-2
aaazzzdeeeduuulaaa4 days ago
+5
Sure, but they are a stateless nation. This is essentially what would happen to Ukraine unless the government upholds its responsibility to maintain the nation state, as they've done admirably.
5
yvesp904 days ago
-5
"Kurds" aren't a nation, they're people, an ethnicity. Ukraine is a country, its people are Eastern Slavic. Differentiate between ethnicities and countries in your points otherwise logical drift is bound to happen. Countries or "sovereign nations" are an intersubjective concept while ethnicities are another flavour of that, but more rigidly backed by biology while not being exclusively such
In a socialist society the people and the state become interwoven where an attack on the state is akin an attack on the people. This is more common in collectivist cultures, usually Eastern, while Western cultures are individualistic. This was blown out of proportion via decades or maybe centuries of neoliberalism. The end result? You have societies that don't feel they're part of anything and even feel like society is their enemy. Rightfully so they don't want to die for such society. European powers handled this for so long via dictator feudalism. What you call "rosy ideals" now is simply the actual will of the people. Absolute shock that people don't wanna die for a society that doesn't give two fucks about them. If you actually want to fix this, do like Singapore which was then also copied by China. Increase homeownership to reach 95% and collective ownership. A person who goes to war without owning anything is fighting for the elite, not his family
Too much for you as a society? Then call s**** a s****, a form of neofeudalism which is what people are waking up for. So please spare us the "martial law" bs and don't drown nuance. I have to intention on dying for VW so they can build drone for Israel
-5
Ludwigofthepotatoppl4 days ago
+4
The state is the government, the country is the land, the nation is the people.
4
yvesp904 days ago
-2
Your response holds no substance whatsoever. Please refrain from regurgitating stuff you don't understand or enunciate yourself on topics based on slogans. Have a good day
-2
CuriousButNotJewish3 days ago
+2
Ukrainian is an ethnicity, there is no such thing as "Eastern Slav" except as an umbrella word for the etjnicities of Polish, Russian, Ukrainian and Belarussian.
PS: Home ownership in Ukraine is 95%.
[https://cedos.org.ua/en/researches/housing-and-residential-conditions-of-ukrainians-survey-results/](https://cedos.org.ua/en/researches/housing-and-residential-conditions-of-ukrainians-survey-results/)
2
aaazzzdeeeduuulaaa3 days ago
+1
Idk what you're smoking man, but the point is that in a democratic society the people elect the government to represent the people's interest.
So, when there's demand for better education, the government tries to build more schools. When simple house fires can torch entire cities, the government ensures there are enough fire stations.
And when Russians want to conquer, pillage, and r*** an otherwise peaceful nation state like Ukraine, it is the government's responsibility to ensure it can uphold the sovereignty of the nation and its people. That's what the people elected the government to do.
It is resistance to tyranny, orchestrated by a democratically elected government which represents the will of the people. The alterative is to liver under imperialist facist rule. You take your pick.
1
yvesp903 days ago
I don't need to smoke much to understand that what you laid out is a pipe dream that is what's promised but not what the people get. No need to really further the debate as I doubt we'd meet eye to eye on this. Have a good day/night mate
0
yvesp904 days ago
+1
You can argue this if people actually hold the land, which was the main policy of LKY in Singapore. Here everyone is aware that you don't die for your home and family but for the rich billionaires that keep you in a rent spiral till you die. Or for health care that's being gutted for their benefit, and the list goes on. You die for a system that erode the working class, not the working class itself
1
Existing_Increase_874 days ago
+2
Or maybe they fight for the millions living under occupation or tens of thousands of kids kidnapped by Ruzzia?
2
DefiantRaspberry1614 days ago
-7
So you think it is okay to force people to fight and die against their will? I think a country is less important than human lives.
-7
CuriousButNotJewish4 days ago
+10
100%, or we'd all be Nazis.
10
Traditional_Cry80754 days ago
-54
No they shouldn't. War is for men
-54
Dangerous_Seesaw_6234 days ago
+22
Nah. Either you draft women too, or you don't draft any one, period.
22
PrisonersofFate4 days ago
-5
Who takes care of the kids? War effort is on the back as well. Education, manufacture
-5
CuriousButNotJewish3 days ago
+2
In Ukraine single parents are extempted from the draft already. One stays home, one goes to war. If you're single, too bad.
2
PrisonersofFate3 days ago
+4
Said like that, it’s fair and I agree if one parent stays behind
4
Dangerous_Seesaw_6233 days ago
+3
If they don't have kids, then the problem is? Fathers and mothers should be exempt from draft if a draft is instated.
3
Throwawayaccountdell4 days ago
+5
Take the Advice of your Username and Cry harder Traditional Conservative!!! Women in Ukraine also have an obligation to defend their country too!!!
5
Ok_Log98642 days ago
+3
is ukraine doing badly that this is turning up?
and women dont have to be on frontline to help country in war, its just seeing how so many left to eu to fuel their instagram journeys and probably never come back while men are getting shelled in trenches is sick.
3
Throwawayaccountdell1 day ago
+2
I agree with you! It's not right only one gender gets obligated to stay and help while another gender is free to leave as they please when they want. Either everyone is required to help out or no one is. Not sure how bad Ukraine is doing but population wise they are a lot smaller then Russia which makes requiring women to stay and help a good idea since they need as many people as they can to help in different ways.
2
Special_Region46753 days ago
+7
Between this and requiring men to ask the government for permission to leave the country, looks like Germany is incredibly sexist and oppressive towards men.
7
InsaneBasti2 days ago
+5
German here, can confirm. Classic feminism tale of "equality? Sike! We take over and treat yall like sht" turbostarted by Merkel. And Merz is the saddest excuse for a man ive ever seen. Hes so insecure he always feels like he doesnt even know whst hes talking about.. and then proves it by contradicting himself. This just further fuel the men hate in germany. "All the white old men are in control! And they just decide bs! Men soo bad, all men the same yadayada"
5
Questionsaboutsanity4 days ago
+4
*this guy* is called fotzen-fritz for a reason
4
MistakeEastern54144 days ago
+5
das merz ich mir, junger mann!
5
Careful-Calendar89224 days ago
+4
The forced conscription of ukranian and Russian men is causing refugee surges in border countries. You can’t drag people from their homes and break their legs in front of their kids and not expect people to run scared. No matter which side you are on, the forced conscription from both sides is brutal and disruptive. I feel bad for the men who just want to live and are seeing that even Germany wants to kick them when they are down.
4
crookedzz4 days ago
+1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
confidentlyfish2 days ago
+1
Bastards
1
longestboie3 days ago
+1
Our dear chancellor disgusts me.
1
bwoah07_gp24 days ago
-11
There should be no draft. What Ukraine is forcing upon its people is incorrect.
-11
ENMSK4 days ago
+12
Then states having forced draft will always win upon spontaneous drafting ceteris paribus. We are not living in an idealistic utopia. Wake up.
12
Special_Region46753 days ago
+2
No they won't. Ukrainian women aren't drafted, in fact they can leave the country freely.
2
44Stryker444 days ago
+5
Part of being a responsible citizen is fighting for your country when necessary. You don’t get to have only the positives with none of the responsibilities
5
Farronski4 days ago
+5
Then let the responsible citizens fight. I will never die for my country.
5
44Stryker443 days ago
+1
Then you should forfeit whatever citizenship you have an leave the country you’re in
1
vreemdevince3 days ago
+3
Can't forfeit mine if it's the only one I have.
3
Farronski3 days ago
+3
My duty to my country is paid for in taxes, not blood.
3
44Stryker443 days ago
+4
Taxes keep the country operating. Defending it keeps it existing. If you’re willing to accept the benefits of citizenship, but aren’t willing to defend said country when the time comes, then you deserve to be treated accordingly
4
melixxa3 days ago
+3
Dude, not everyone has to share your patriotic or nationalistic beliefs.
I find it admirable that you would die for your country, it’s genuinely brave and selfless, but not everyone has the same values and that’s okay.
3
Farronski3 days ago
+1
If my choice is death or losing citizenship I pick losing citizenship.
Another country will gladly accept my taxes.
1
InsaneBasti2 days ago
+1
Ahahahahahahahaha. Good one xD anyway, why would anyone care to be a "responsible citizen" in the comedy that is modern politics? Its nothing more but the place you life, literal dirt. And if you wanna die for said dirt.. well i just take that natural selection.
1
Special_Region46753 days ago
+1
The fact that women aren't drafted directly proves your statement go be wrong.
1
clickillsfun4 days ago
+1
Yeah right. Let the ruZZian scum just genocide entire country and and r*** and torture the rest! How dare they're resisting! Stupid and illegal draft laws in EU countries preventing the ruZZian greatness!
1
Farronski4 days ago
Of course, they are allowed to fight back. But forcing people to fight at the front is not just "resisting"; it's condemning people to die. You can be against Russia's imperialistic war, but also against throwing people against their will into a meat grinder.
My country is not at war, but I also wouldn't die for it. Honestly, would you?
0
clickillsfun3 days ago
This is how society works. For one group of people being able to enjoy democracy, freedom and survival, another group of people needs to make sacrifices. Draft is not completely fair but it's the fairest law available and was passed democratically.
There is no viable more fair alternative available atm.
The entire planet needs to pass some laws like "if some country starts a war the entire rest of the planet automatically takes the victim's side until it's over and the guilty are brought to justice".
Until then that's the only alternative.
Even super rich countries like the USA are not rich enough to pay for a standing contract army without a draft and discriminating big parts of their population to get poor people to sign it "out of free will" so they can have affordable education and health care they can't get otherwise.
0
Farronski3 days ago
+3
While everything you write is correct, I, as an individual, still don't want to die to defend my country.
While I'm happy to pay high taxes and behave in a way that is beneficial for society, I will always draw the line at dying for the greater good. From my perspective, my life and those of my loved ones take precedence over my country's society.
I don't claim to have a solution and I don't know what Ukraine should be doing. I just know what I would be doing.
3
clickillsfun3 days ago
+2
But would you defend yourself and/or your loved ones if someone comes into your home and tries to r***/torture/kill everyone and afterwards will loot and burn your place or just starts living there on top of your decomposing bodies and there is no one else to defend/fight for you?
Would you be then willing to take a fight and a high risk of dying if you could save all/majority of your loved ones but maybe not making it yourself?
If the answer is yes, you decided that for the rest of your micro-society survival it's acceptable to take the risk.
But your micro-society can't survive without being a part of a larger society/group like a society on the state/basic human rights/moral/region/continent/religion/etc level.
2
Farronski3 days ago
+2
Yes, of course, I'm not arguing that.
But in the scenario of someone invading my home, I have very limited options. In the scenario of someone invading my country, 500km away from my home, I can just take my loved ones, leave, and live in another society, not currently at war. My society is replaceable, but my micro-society is not. This is not sustainable if everybody is doing this, yes, but in this scenario I'm only thinking about the survival of the people close to me.
2
abbi492 days ago
+1
Yes it's in your best interest to do that.
As you said, it's not sustainable if all the men leave when another country invades to "protect their micro society".
Thats why people need to be forced to fight at the front (from the State's point of view).
So, many people (like you) will do their best to dodge the draft, and the State will try to catch them. It's just the way things are.
1
pafagaukurinn3 days ago
Is it limited to support in strongest possible terms, or is he prepared to tweak German and EU laws to help with that?
137 Comments