There were many other birders at the landfill where this couple got it, because there was a rare bird there. These other birders did not go on a cruise. I can look on eBird (bird checklist tracking database) right now and see generally where they're at based on reports they've published. No word on if they're being tracked or contacted even though they were in the same place at the same time and presumably the same spot the couple were in.
54
warp992 days ago
+3
It is unlikely to be the source site because it was visited too soon before the first symptoms were evident and none of the locals are sick.
3
UTC_Hellgate3 days ago
+2494
We all laughed at Zombie and viral based apocalypses as impossible, noone would act that way, government's would quarantine the infected!
The last decade has shown us the folly of all that.
2494
KhaoticMess3 days ago
+86
Remember the old days of 2019, when the phrase "Avoid it like the plague" still meant something? Good times....
86
Sweet-Competition-153 days ago
+9
I still use that phrase...perhaps I should rethink it.
9
Emergency-Gap-79213 days ago
+2
Omfg….. 🙀
2
Icefyre243 days ago
+1234
I was thinking along these same lines when I watched "Outbreak".
I figured no one would be stupid enough to get sick and then go to the theater, or any public venue knowing they were a walking contagion vector.
Man, was I wrong about that.
When COVID came along, people went to the theater, to the beach, went to parties, parades, other cities, and other states, simply because they thought they knew better, and didn't want to be told what to do.
It's been a few years now, and they STILL complain about what they were told to do back then.
Some people are just completely asinine, entitled, and \*\*\*\*\*\*\* stupid.
1234
Demorant3 days ago
+469
I have a Covid denying coworker. He got it. Refused to believe he had anything other than the flu. He kept going over to his elderly parents place, they both caught it and died. He doesn't believe they died of Covid, despite what the medical records show, and he doesn't believe he had anything to do with their deaths, despit being the only visitor they had during lockdown. He still complains that his two sisters won't talk to him over "Covid nonsense."
469
yipape3 days ago
+314
Accepting covid is real means accepting he likely got his parents killed. Its easier to be in denial.
314
ComplexEntertainer133 days ago
+34
Ye you can more or less backtrack severe flu seasons and their peaks by looking at excess deaths among the elderly. It's usually one if not the most likely cause for excess deaths in those age groups each year. Another one is severe heat waves.
34
Nerubim3 days ago
+18
Yeah that ain't denial, bro didn't change. Neither did his motives or values or lack thereof, especially towards his family. Or as of now, lack thereof.
18
feor13002 days ago
+19
I mean, it is denial. It was easier for him because he was already in denial before it all happened, so he just extended that denial to his culpability in his parents' deaths, but he's definitely in denial about the fact that he could possibly be, or have done anything, wrong.
19
Nerubim2 days ago
+3
Being in denial would mean there is something in his head telling him it might all be true. What I am saying is he has no such voice to deny nor did his relatives death change him to finally have that kind of voice of reason TO deny. There isn't a seed of redemption in a person unwilling to change in the slightest even when faced with the death of their supposed loved ones.
He is lost and there is no coming back if that is not enough to give him pause. That's the kind of person who'd go back to the last human camp in a zombie apocalypse after being bitten and still be offended when people shoot him as he starts craving brains.
3
sitdowncomfy3 days ago
+159
even if you didn't believe in covid, going to visit elderly people with flu is madness!
159
Loud-Commercial97563 days ago
+40
What a stupid piece of shit. Holy f***.
40
shakeyshake13 days ago
+82
The truth of it would probably destroy him. His current stance lets him deny responsibility for killing his parents.
I’m guessing that isn’t an uncommon reaction to being responsible for something happening to your loved one.
I tried to come up with some insightful conclusion for this comment, but I’ve got nothing.
82
IGNSolar73 days ago
+23
My cousin drove across state lines during Covid to see my grandmother with the sole purpose of "owning the libs," as he wrote on Facebook. Didn't even want to see her, just wanted to prove a point.
23
HotSauceHigh3 days ago
+7
Does he have a history of head injury or drug use? Genuinely curious
7
IGNSolar73 days ago
+3
Head injury? Wouldn't shock me. Drug use? I don't think so.
3
CallMeMrButtPirate3 days ago
+13
Yup same story with one of my old weed dealers, baffling
13
DuskShy3 days ago
+14
Ah yes, it's much better to live in a world where you... got your parents killed with the flu instead of the "made up virus" from the wokies.
14
cmbhere3 days ago
+20
One day this co-worker is going to piss you off and you're going to say something like "your willful ignorance killed your parents."
When you say that you should not feel bad about it. It's not too far. It's not heartless. It is something they need to be told. Maybe if enough people do this they'll actually think a bit the next time we have something like an easily spread virus.
20
Avocado_Aly2 days ago
+6
I wish it would’ve taken his stupid ass out of the gene pool
6
literallymoist3 days ago
+93
Outbreak is great, but post-2011 I used to show my class Contagion to illustrate chains of transmission and the scientific concepts of studying them.
That end sequence still gives me chills (figuratively).
93
maxdragonxiii3 days ago
+33
I watched it post COVID. not a movie I'll recommend ever to watch again after a pandemic 2 years later. it was honestly hard at times to finish it.
33
erasethenoise3 days ago
+14
I saw that movie in theaters when it came out. It was crazy to think back on it as I watched the Covid saga unfold.
14
maxdragonxiii3 days ago
+14
even watching it 2 years later, I was like "shit I remember when I saw this in the news... that too... oh yeah that happened... yeah I remember not quite believe it happening at the moment..." like they got so much shockingly right. the only thing they missed was people intentionally infecting themselves, but maybe I didnt remember.
14
IamGabyGroot3 days ago
+15
Oh but they did! I know a few who wanted to prove to everyone that if you're healthy, it's no big deal.
One of these idiots was a coworker who infected their entire family and killed most of her family over 60.
15
mgranja3 days ago
+3
They mean in the movie.
3
Sadface2012 days ago
+3
The funny thing is, your coworker isn't wrong. We've known for a very looooong time that babies and elderly are vulnerable populations, and your coworker proved it by killing her elderly family members.
3
lowfiswish3 days ago
+10
I watched it during the pandemic to get the most outta it. Glad I waited til recent times to read Station 11. But then the hantavirus showed up. Honestly a virus of any level near Covid at this point would be bad for civilization.
10
SupWitChoo3 days ago
+10
Another good “outbreak” movie is Rabid (1977)- an early Cronenberg flick- watched it during COVID and (despite the science fiction/body horror elements), for an almost 50 year old movie it was interesting how much it paralleled real life- down to the citizens having vaccination cards to be in public.
10
dramallama-IDST3 days ago
+6
My biology teacher would put on outbreak whenever it was a ‘cba to teach’ class (end of term etc.) but we only ever watched the first 50 minutes so all I saw was all of the horrible hemorrhagic deaths. It was my first introduction to bio warfare, thanks, Mr Cavendish!
6
gamesbackward2 days ago
+2
That Dr. Robin can sure Cook.
2
jtrisn13 days ago
+325
It really opened my eyes to the amount of people who can't control themselves enough to stay home for 2 weeks.
325
freexe3 days ago
+98
The amount of people who just had to go on holiday was also insane to me.
98
Zelcron2 days ago
+6
People were sharing discounted airline tickets as some kind of "hack"
6
Sweet-Competition-153 days ago
+48
Or wear a mask...it's not rocket science.
48
innocentbunnies3 days ago
+15
I’m currently sick, on the mend but definitely still sick, and I went to work today. I’m wearing a mask because I am not interested in being a “sharing is caring” person with this junk. A coworker thanked me for having the wherewithal to even think to do this basic thing. I wish more of my coworkers wore masks when they came in sick. The joys of retail.
15
Sweet-Competition-153 days ago
+2
May you heal quickly...I'm hoping that you've a solid support system (family & friends) to care for you.
2
willanthony3 days ago
+19
* and still complain about it 6 years later
19
BeMySquishy1233 days ago
+72
And so many of them were the people in charge telling everyone else to stay home
72
3Ngineered3 days ago
+2
It's as if they know the rules aren't for them. There must be going on a lot more behind the scenes, but this was one of the things they couldn't hide.
2
affemannen3 days ago
+11
Covid and it's aftermath made me lose my last faith in humanity and it's survival as a species, we as a collective get down weighed by the dumb ones.
11
Silvawuff3 days ago
+11
Even ants kick their sick hive mates out before they can enact mass death on the colony.
11
SoHereIAm853 days ago
+20
I shouldn't have been surprised considering how many people literally can't shut up for a couple minutes. It astounds me sometimes since I'm a quiet person and took to heart the advice to keep my mouth shut instead of proving I'm an idiot. Not being able to stay home is just an extension of that impulse control.
20
Icy-Bunch6093 days ago
+5
Really open your eyes to the people who think COVID was a 2 week thing.
5
bloop76763 days ago
+31
It was also just that there was a lot of reluctance to actually escalate it to a serious response. I remember in Canada we went from still riding the subway to the office, with people visibly coughing around, to completely shutting down public facilities within a week. And that was after it was known to have already spread internationally into Italy.
I'm now amazed I didn't get it in that early part of March when there was no strict response yet.
31
Sweet-Competition-153 days ago
+6
Both my boss's son and I contracted covid *before* it was a known issue...I've never felt so deathly ill, *before or since.*
6
RandomNumbers7485123 days ago
+17
>and didn't want to be told what to do.
And it was so much worse: there formed social groups and movements that started to deliberatly do the opposite, and not only ignore scientific evidence but started to made up their own pseudo-scientific fields amd their own politically interested groups telling them what they wanted to know.
It felt like a mind-epidemic was happening, in a way zombifying people within the actual epidemic...
17
Ntroepy3 days ago
+7
>It felt like a mind epidemic…
That’s an excellent way to put it. So much of MAGA feels like that as they’ve embraced this cult mentality of “*I’m right, you’re wrong AND evil*” so anything the other side says is automatically dismissed. Especially when their president refuses to wear masks and severely downplays its severity.
7
brokencreedman3 days ago
+33
Good thing is hanta is much less transmissible human to human that covid. There will be some cases, but I dont think this is covid 2.0.
33
Lord_Mikal3 days ago
+25
Less transmissable but MUCH more deadly.
25
brokencreedman3 days ago
+8
Sure. But that less transmissibility means less people get it, less death, and less chance of mutation.
8
larapeaches3 days ago
+23
Unless it’s not being tracked correctly… as in people who left the ship early have gone home and spread it to others all along the way and none of them are symptomatic yet, going about their lives as usual and spreading it to others. Somewhere in that up to 8 week period some people will begin to see symptoms but by then, they will have transferred it to others. The severity is not quite as easy to dismiss as some people are making it out to be.
23
Plastic-One-54683 days ago
+9
The asymptomatic period for the Andes strain can be anywhere from 1-8 weeks and you can be contagious even while asymptomatic. "Close and prolonged personal contact" could be kissing your partner, taking care of your kids, sitting next to someone everyday at work, sharing a drink etc. The fact that the r0 is lower doesn't actually mean that much when the incubation period and possible asymptomatic-but-contagious time out in the community is such a long window for people to spreading it around.
9
Anti-Charm-Quark3 days ago
+3
There no evidence yet for asymptomatic transmission
3
larapeaches3 days ago
+7
There is enough evidence for the National Institute for Communicable Diseases to have updated their SOP's on Andes Hantavirus this week, stating one can spread the virus up to two days in advance and more than 7 days after onset of symptoms in some cases:
Section 4.2 Infectious Period (New Section):
https://www.nicd.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Hantavirus-contact-SOP-V3.1.pdf
7
Ambitious_End_89463 days ago
+3
It is probably still too early to know its profile, would be my guess.
I remember researching this virus last year and could only find standard health info from the main websites, and lots of things describing it as "rare." (I'd been clearing and catching mice in my attic)
3
brokencreedman3 days ago
+2
I think that rarity is a good sign. Those rodents in Argentina have had this disease for a long time right? So if info is so rare, and case numbers are so low, doesn't that imply that infection isn't super common, and when it has happened, it hasnt spread to people much?
2
Ambitious_End_89463 days ago
+7
we said that about Covid too
7
TropoMJ3 days ago
+2
A lot of things were said about covid that have also been said about a huge amount of other diseases. Most of them didn't end up becoming covid.
2
brokencreedman3 days ago
+3
And thats the good thing. People freaked over monkeypox, and that did nothing. The ebola cases here freaked people out, but that was handled.
My biggest concern is that our government sucks in America and rfk jr is an idiot so if something did happen, I have very little faith he would handle it well.
3
IDr3yI3 days ago
+18
For now
18
versatile_dev3 days ago
+16
It can always mutate to a less severe but more transmissible variant.
16
Indiana_Indiana3 days ago
+11
So far it doesn’t seem to really do that at close to the rate Covid or the Flu does. Still possible tho
Edit: why are people downvoting me? We’ve known of Andes Virus since 1995. We sequence the genome today and it’s the same virus pretty much 31 years later. Covid would mutate in a month. Y’all want to panic or something? Chill out
11
jaunesolo818293 days ago
+9
Not exactly..there’s evidence now that’s it’s much more transmissible than thought before
9
brokencreedman3 days ago
+3
Everything I've seen so far, and tge statements from health officials and scientists, is to the contrary of that. But it is still early. My understanding is there are still only 8 total cases, and no one else on the ship is showing symptoms at this point, but I may have old info. Im not keeping up with it 100% cuz so far, im not worried.
3
Plastic-One-54683 days ago
+4
You can be exposed and infected and still asymptomatic for potentially 8 weeks before you start showing symptoms of being sick. Anyone that's exposed to the Andes strain is supposed to go into an 8 week quarantine. These cruise ship passengers have been island hopping and disembarking and going back to their homes. This actually has the mathematical potential to be very bad.
4
kaityl33 days ago
+2
There have been other outbreaks of this strain before, for example one person caught it from sitting at a table that a sick person walked past at a restaurant. Same Andes hantavirus and was pretty recent too. IMO, the truth is we just don't have enough data to say anything with certainty
2
brokencreedman3 days ago
+2
But all of those outbreaks have been minor and contained easily to my understanding. There haven't been millions of cases of the Andes version. Less than several hundred in total over all outbreaks, maybe, if that?
2
[deleted]3 days ago
+5
[removed]
5
ArchAngel6213 days ago
+5
Yep, over a million people dead.
5
gizmoglitch3 days ago
+41
The whole scene in Community where they're bit but don't think they'll get infected because they're "special" comes to mind: https://youtu.be/pDCY0D_F2gU
Everyone thinks they're the exception until it happens to them.
41
a_duck_in_past_life3 days ago
+6
I like how abba is playing in the background and also how Jeff says he hates Banana MD less now because of how much he hated his normal self
6
Jellicent-Leftovers3 days ago
+81
To be fair the WHO infection modeling was actually pretty accurate and accounted for selfish/hostile behaviour dodging qurantines.
But even they were blindsided by the acts of people purposefully infecting others and swapping vaccines with saline.
81
SgtElectroSketch3 days ago
+13
I remember when people laughed about the [corrupted blood incident](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrupted_Blood_incident) being studied because it was a video game.
Turns out people f****** suck
13
Wankeritis2 days ago
+2
I was *there* during that pre-patch and it was absolutely insane before they finally shut down the servers.
2
Burger_Thief3 days ago
+2
Swapping vaccines? Werent the vaccines administered by health workers?
2
Clueless_Otter2 days ago
+10
The health workers were the ones doing the swapping. Unfortunately even healthcare workers are not immune to being anti-vaccination.
10
Eelysanio3 days ago
+18
"I'm infected? I REALLY NEED to take a busy economy flight to a busy city RIGHT NOW!"
18
lesser_panjandrum3 days ago
+17
"Wearing a face mask? Covering my mouth when I cough? What am I, a communist?"
17
Lazy-Plankton52703 days ago
+19
It's ok according to Trump this a democrat hoax
Just like covid was a democrat hoax and the million Americans that died were crisis actors trying to make Trump look bad
Lol
19
SupWitChoo3 days ago
+18
“Just stop testing people and it will go away. It will be over by Easter. An Easter miracle!” God, I remember those daily check-ins with the President and staff where Trump would ramble incoherently for a half hour. It’s the ONLY time I’ve ever seen a local news station cut a President off and switch to local programming. It was embarrassing.
18
a_duck_in_past_life3 days ago
+15
Exactly. I'm not worried this will be a full blown pandemic like Covid, but I'm worried that it will be uncontrolled now. It's mainly just stayed in a small area of Argentina. Now we possibly have it on like most continents and I don't believe that agencies will track it down in time to prevent spread. So we'll just have pop ups of hanta virus that is spreadable via humans to humans, all over the globe, and that allows for more opportunities for the virus to multuply and thusly, mutate. I'm scared of 4 years from now when this thing mutates in some random city from India or China or something (sorry y'all, but you have large, densely populated cities), and becomes more spreadable human to human.
15
nicuramar3 days ago
+6
> Now we possibly have it on like most continents
So far no one who wasn’t on the ship have been confirmed infected.
6
DrGlamhattan20203 days ago
+4
Remember that Obama put into place heavy CDC and WHO protocols to ensure there would be better contingency plans. This was done in response to that ebola b****. Trump immediately removed all plans installed by Obama as revenge for the roasting during the white house correspondents dinner.
We had plans in place to prevent these things from being unable to be quarantined... but the maga sector thinks removing this is making us and the world great. *does nails*
4
JohnBrownSurvivor3 days ago
+2
Yeah, I'm beginning to think that all the zombies in the movies did not actually acquire a taste for human flesh. Instead, they were just pissed off at the people who hadn't gotten infected yet, and we're going around trying to prove to them that everything was just fine. And/or intentionally infecting them out of spite and political identity.
2
NoirTank3 days ago
+911
What pisses me off about this, is you can’t tell if the news cycle is blowing this up for views or if this could potentially be another epidemic. For the sake of the world can we just get unified clarity on this? For fucks sake they are already working on a vaccine for this, highly concerning if it’s due to how dangerous it is or if big pharma is trying to get a cash grab
911
BadahBingBadahBoom3 days ago
+1344
>For the sake of the world can we just get unified clarity on this?
Scientist here. Bit of a long explanation but hope this clarifies things a bit:
Hantaviruses' long latent periods are actually the reason they are completely different to pandemic-potential viruses like coronaviruses.
Many are quoting hantavirus's R₀ (and it possibly being roughly similar to Covid) as if that's the key thing. It's not.
Contrary to popular belief, R₀ is not actually the speed of an outbreak. It is the rate at which it grows (the basic reproduction number), i.e. how many people an infected person will successfully infect before they are no longer infectious (either recovered or died). But *how long* it takes for that person to infect others depends on the latent period of the virus (the time from being infected to when you start becoming infectious and can infect others).
Covid (original strain) had an R₀ of around 3 and a median latent period of somewhere around 5 days (this did reduce a bit as the pandemic progressed).
That meant if you had one person infected with Covid it would take only 3 weeks before you had 100 cases, and 10,000 3 weeks after that (and about half a million 3 weeks after that). That's how Covid spread so incredibly quickly.
Average R₀ of hantaviruses is around \~1.2 and even if we take this Andes virus at the upper end previously observed at 2.12, with a median latent period of 18 days it would take *four months* for the outbreak to reach 100 cases. And that is assuming we do nothing in those four months to reduce the R₀ (which we already started to implement <6 weeks after the suspected infection of the first/index patient). Contact tracing is much less of a race for hantavirus than Covid.
Furthermore, human-to-human transmission of Andes virus appears to be pretty much only from close contact and the typical infectious period (time from when you start becoming infectious to when you stop) is about one day which again makes contact tracing a lot easier.
Whilst it is a little bit debated about the ability for asymptomatic transmission this is currently viewed as a minimal contribution to its spread and even those who believe it could, acknowledge this is only for the ~24h before symptoms start. The fact everyone now exposed is either in quarantine or aware to self isolate actually makes continued spread unlikely (again not saying we don't see a few more sporadic cases but this is not Jan 2020 by any stretch).
To put it in perspective, it appears the first patient contracted the disease before boarding back in *March*. The fact it is now May and we only have 7 more cases (only 5 confirmed at this point) should really give people confidence shit is not about to hit the fan like we could already see by Feb 2020.
Hantavirus at R₀ = 2.12 and a latent period of 18 days would be expected to cause cases to double approx. every two weeks. (For comparison Covid cases doubled about every 3 days in the UK in the beginning of the outbreak.)
Considering it has now been \~6 weeks (3 doublings) since the first person likely got infected in Argentina before departing on 01 Apr that actually fits pretty well with the current 8 cases: 6 confirmed, 2 suspected. (Being generous, it actually fits *perfectly*.)
Let's see if there are more than half a dozen to a dozen or so new cases by the end of the next two weeks. Atm there is nothing unusual about the contagiousness of this hantavirus at all.
As for the high fatality rate of hantaviruses compared to Covid...
With a \~35% (30-40%) infection fatality rate (IFR) for Andes virus (the hantavirus in this outbreak) and \~1% (0.5-1.5%) IFR for original strain Covid, six weeks after your index patient you would expect to see 8 cases with 3 deaths for Andes virus, and \~6,500 cases with 65 deaths with Covid. (It is actually amazing *how* closely this hantavirus outbreak matches what we would expect.)
After 12 weeks you would see 31 cases + 11 deaths for Andes virus, and \~100 million cases + 1 million deaths for Covid.
Ofc, Covid never got to 1 million deaths that quickly because interventions were taken before 12 weeks that massively reduced the R₀. But the initial exponential growth in cases, hospitalisations, and deaths in countries indicated it very well could have continued and got that high. And even with everything we did do, in the 12 weeks from 01 Feb to 25 Apr 2020, >200,000 people still died from Covid outside of China.
We're about 6 weeks in and so far we have 3 deaths. Every single person who has tested positive for hantavirus *got it from the cruise ship*. And of the only two suspected cases (KLM flight attendant and Spanish woman) who potentially got it from outside of the ship (the Dutch woman's second flight from Johannesburg), both have tested negative (though we need to wait a few days for follow-up tests to ensure this isn't a false negative as this is possible testing soon after symptoms appear). Both are reported to have mild symptoms and the hospitalisation was a precaution based on their exposure *not* severity of illness.
So atm literally everything is in line with what we know about hantaviruses and (if you know a bit about virology) the idea that this hantavirus could suddenly change to be like Covid after infecting just a dozen or so people with at most a few generations of infections is truly fanciful. If we are really going to be *that* worried we should be focusing on the literal dozens of other viruses that are much more likely to be the next Covid before hantaviruses.
For more information on this I would stick to:
- Reliable news sources: [BBC News](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8r8j1l6j0go) and [(US) NPR](https://www.npr.org/2026/05/08/nx-s1-5811917/hantavirus-andres-mvhondius-ship-rodents)
- Medical and health authorities/bodies: [UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)](https://ukhsa.blog.gov.uk/2026/05/05/what-is-hantavirus-how-is-it-transmitted-and-what-are-the-symptoms/), [National Travel Health Network and Centre (NaTHNaC)](https://travelhealthpro.org.uk/news/905/hantavirus-cruise-ship-outbreak), and [European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)](https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/infectious-disease-topics/hantavirus-infection/surveillance-and-updates/andes-hantavirus-outbreak)
- and expert scientists: [London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)](https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/news/2026/rapid-reaction-should-i-be-worried-about-hantavirus) and [STAT News - Experts d******* pandemic fears from cruise ship hantavirus outbreak](https://archive.ph/iSbAs)
Whatever you do please don't get your news from TikTokers or social media as some others have been doing.
PS:
>they are already working on a vaccine for this, highly concerning if it’s due to how dangerous it is or if big pharma is trying to get a cash grab
Moderna first started developing their hantavirus vaccine in 2023, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) started theirs in 2024. Their work obviously has more public attention now but it was not a result of this outbreak.
These vaccines won't come to market for at least a year (likely more) and people will have long forgotten about the hantavirus outbreak by then.
1344
Ntroepy3 days ago
+147
Thank you for some expert knowledge and insights into this mysterious disease. I feel much calmer about it all now. Thank you.
147
Unitedfateful3 days ago
+42
Should be the top comment tbf
42
m00fster3 days ago
+17
Science!
17
Dry-Leg-1653 days ago
+14
Saved. Thank you.
I wouldn’t be mistaken at saying since this is a known virus, the responses are more academic than reactionary and the procedures are known?
I ask because my 12 year old asked me about the virus on Friday and I explained basically, it’s a known virus that spreads human to human, it takes a lot more for that to happen, and due to the “burn rate” of the virus it would be difficult to turn into covid, however I cited the that the weeks to have symptoms show more than Covid might pose a problem.
Based off what you said about someone becoming infectious vs infected it makes a huge difference and makes it difficult/scary for us.
I take from what I read that was incorrect, yes?
14
BadahBingBadahBoom3 days ago
+27
>I wouldn’t be mistaken at saying since this is a known virus, the responses are more academic than reactionary and the procedures are known?
Not necessarily.
The problem is there have been so few human-to-human outbreaks of Andes virus that we don't have a huge epidemiological history to draw from. Whilst I don't *think* this is going to be hugely different to those previously seen we still need to be cautious. This is why you see all the incredibly strict measures that are currently being taken to remove the remaining passengers from the ship. They still don't want anymore people dying from this even if only a tiny number more may die (and even that is not a given as it is entirely possible the final death toll ends up at just 3).
So whilst the hantavirus researchers are certainly very interested in looking at the data from this outbreak there is a real infection control aspect that the WHO and various national health bodies / health security agencies are actively involved in. The takeaway is that atm this *does not* affect the normal population like us and whilst I can't give a 100% guarantee I would place a pretty huge bet this will not affect us in future.
The only people who are directly affected by this are the cruise ship passengers, those who were in very close contact with any who have already left the ship, and those workers who will come into contact with the passengers who are evacuating/isolating (though again from previous outbreaks spread to the last group wasn't seen at all, again totally different to Covid).
>however I cited the that the weeks to have symptoms show more than Covid might pose a problem.
And I think this is where the confusion lies. Yes if it take a long time for a virus to cause symptoms *and* that person is infectious before they have any reason to think they might be then you have the nightmare scenario where they could be walking around for weeks spreading it to a number of other people.
That's not what hantaviruses do though. They are slow, yes, but if you are infected you don't appear to spread it until you have symptoms (again some suggestion just before but this is limited). You also don't appear to be infectious for that long before you stop becoming infectious. So the 'danger window' of you giving it to other people is actually quite limited.
The bigger concern is the fatality rate. Not for the wider public, but for those *who actually are/suspected to be* infectious. Because for them that is obviously very high.
But this is kind of like saying the fatality rate of getting hit by lightning is really high. So why is everyone not freaking out about dying from lightning? Cos there's an infinitesimally small chance that's going to happen to you in the first place.
The main problem with the long incubation period is the fact that even though the chance of any one of the 150 or so people getting hantavirus from the 8 cases is incredibly small, they are *all* going to have to isolate for a number of weeks (45 days is what some countries are requiring but others may even require longer).
The long incubation period is going to be hell for the people affected. It is not something that is concern for the general public, despite it repeatedly being used by some media as a good tagline.
It's actually kind of weird the messaging is not 'thank god the incubation period is so long unlike Covid' because with a roughly similar R₀ that is one of the main reasons this outbreak *isn't* spreading like Covid. But I guess fear gets more clicks, especially in a post-Covid world. This was kind of the same with all the very non-story stories of minor aircraft faults after the 737 Max crashes and door plug loss.
27
Dry-Leg-1653 days ago
+9
Gotcha. So the short I can say to my boy is “the poor souls infected are going to go through hell, and it’s interesting to be mindful of, but overall as long as people don’t go having ‘covid parties’, and the vigilance stays high, we should be fine”?
Also thank you for taking more time to reply!
That said I got one more question:
Long short, work as a 911 call taker/fire dispatcher. When COVID started I said “we need to prepare” to my supervisors. When it hit WA, I said “we need to really begin locking down and placing protocols”…annnnd crickets/you’re histrionic/it’s just the cold yada yada. At what stage would you say for this would be the “canary in the coal mine” moment so I can at least ease my mind and try to tell them that it’s going to hit the proverbial fan?
9
BadahBingBadahBoom3 days ago
+12
>So the short I can say to my boy is “the poor souls infected are going to go through hell, and it’s interesting to be mindful of, but overall as long as people don’t go having ‘covid parties’, and the vigilance stays high, we should be fine”?
Yeah pretty much. Tho I would say we're not at any point where you should avoid social contact. Unless the person hosting the party is someone who was on the ship (and they really shouldn't be hosting parties lol) you can go to parties as normal now. Nobody needs to stay vigilant apart from those treating the passengers affected.
>At what stage would you say for this would be the “canary in the coal mine” moment so I can at least ease my mind and try to tell them that it’s going to hit the proverbial fan?
For pandemics there are usually three red flags:
The first is if the virus behaves like it could be difficult to control - as prev mentioned something that spreads easily human-to-human (like Covid spreading airborne at a distance), has a short latent period & doubling time, a long infectious period, and spreads asymptomatically. Even if there are only a handful of cases these factors are warning sign that it *could* get serious fast.
None of these are really characteristics of previously observed Andes virus outbreaks and so far none of these appear to be the case for this outbreak (if they were we would have seen dozens and dozens of people on that cruise ship infected by now like the Diamond Princess ship in 2020).
The second red flag is if the disease is spreading domestically in the US in infection contacts that are known. And I don't mean the odd one or two cases but a number of Americans getting ill from an infection acquired specifically *in* America. Again, whilst there was initially some concern this may have happened in Johannesburg, South Africa from the Dutch woman's second KLM flight this now appears to not have happened and the only place anyone has been infected is the cruise ship and Argentina.
The third red flag (and the biggest tbh) is if the disease is spreading domestically in people with *no known contacts* of anyone who could have been infected. This is known as community transmission - i.e. contact tracers can't work out who/where they must have been infected by and the infection came from 'the community'. This is where containment starts becoming very difficult and you have to go to population-wide controls like lockdowns because you just don't know who is getting infected from whom and where.
This is what happened with Covid in countries outside China in late Feb/Mar shortly after contact tracing failed. That was the sign that contact tracing and 'test and trace' was not going to cut it.
At the moment we are pretty much zero for three on red flags and the only pandemic I'm even thinking about is the potential for bird flu to spread human to human based on the US dairy farmer cases a couple of years ago (atm no evidence of human-to-human but the rest of the first red flag is huge for bird flu). The fact the CDC has been gutted and the federal government has a pretty indifferent attitude to evidence-based science doesn't help.
12
Dry-Leg-1653 days ago
+2
No nooooo. It’s. It’s fine…this is fine…we toooootally learned our lesson from last time…
2
aaaaaaaarrrrrgh2 days ago
+2
> due to the “burn rate” of the virus
I think this argument is weak. If the "burn" usuallly happens after the virus had an opportunity to spread, the only way high deadliness slows the spread is that it makes people a lot more careful.
2
NoirTank3 days ago
+5
Thank you for explaining this in such a clear way
5
Old_Boah3 days ago
+4
Thank you for laying it all out there. Honestly annoys me how many people on Listnook are getting worked up over this who I know haven’t had a flu or covid vaccine in years
4
Skarmory22 days ago
+2
Listnook is full of terminally online people, many of them misfits. The world is always about to end to them...
2
virtualracer2 days ago
+3
I just want to thank you for sharing your wealth of knowledge. It’s put me at ease with this whole situation.
3
nommabelle2 days ago
+3
Thank you for sharing! This really helps me understand the severity
3
yabog83 days ago
+16
OK. Start hoarding toilet paper and taking horse deformed now is what you are saying.
16
throwawaybabyjesus3 days ago
+24
You're so kind to be taking care of those deformed horses.
24
_Morvar_3 days ago
+2
Thank you
2
seruco2 days ago
+2
Fantastic explanation! Thanks!
2
ChocoQuinoa2 days ago
+2
Mind sharing which are the dangerous viruses we should be looking for? :D
2
BadahBingBadahBoom2 days ago
+12
Yeah this comes up regularly as various health security / public health bodies review which pathogens need monitoring and whether our current pandemic response plans need updating/amending.
This is even more imperative in the last 20 or so years as air travel continues to grow massively particularly in developing regions, wildlife habitats increasingly become encroached by expanding human developments, and climate change moves the normal regions diseases spread (particularly those spread by insects such as mosquitos).
Here's a few interesting reads published relatively recently:
[BBC News - UK draws up new disease-threat watch list](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr72d7p5dl2o)
[UKHSA - Priority Pathogens: The disease families which require urgent scientific research](https://ukhsa.blog.gov.uk/2025/03/25/priority-pathogens-the-disease-families-which-require-urgent-scientific-research/)
[UKHSA - The priority pathogen family R&D tool \[SEE TABLE ON PAGE 8\]](https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67f5259ae3c60873d6c90d08/UKHSA-priority-pathogen-families-research-and-development-tool.pdf)
For viruses of 'High' pandemic potential, essentially (in no particular order):
* MERS
* Non-seasonal influenza (e.g. H5N1/Bird flu)
* Nipah virus
* Enterovirus D68, A71
... and 'Medium':
* Adenovirus
* Norovirus
* Human metapneumovirus
* Monkeypox
There are many others that have epidemic (localised outbreaks) but not pandemic (global) potential.
[Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) - Priority pathogens](https://cepi.net/priority-pathogens)
[Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) - Here are the viruses an infectious disease expert is watching in 2026](https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/viral-outbreaks-are-always-horizon-here-are-viruses-infectious-disease-expert) and [Six major health threats that could shape 2026](https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/six-major-health-threats-could-shape-2026-heres-what-experts-are-watching)
[WHO - Pathogens Prioritization \[SEE TABLE ON PAGE 8 AND 9\]](https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/consultation-rdb/prioritization-pathogens-v6final.pdf?sfvrsn=c98effa7_9&download=true)
12
Sq_Imp293 days ago
+103
Yeah I am reading it doesn't easily spread human to human , but they are also contact tracing?
With covid, I saw how some governments and authorities learnt to downplay the severity in the service of 'economy'. I wish I could trust them to communicate the severity of the situation here, but unfortunately I can't.
103
Rich_Housing9713 days ago
+87
This particular strain of hantavirus can spread human to human. It's not as infectious as COVID. There was an entire cruise ship and only like 8 of them tested positive. That flight attendant tested negative.
This is also not a novel virus like COVID was. We have vaccines either being trialed already or already out.
87
SomeGalNamedAshley3 days ago
+13
But isn't there normally a multi-week incubation period with hantavirus?
13
rrrand0mmm3 days ago
+19
The R0 value is pretty small near 1 compared to covids 4-6.
With a 40% fatality rate it’ll be tough to become a pandemic.
I think the world is just extra cautious because of 6 years ago.
If anyone thinks Trump isn’t the anti christ at this point is confused!
19
SomeGalNamedAshley3 days ago
+2
I thought the R0 was a little over two. Was it mentioned that Trump fired the cruise ship inspectors?
Trump was born under a blood moon and I've seen his works and followers. I need no convincing that he's the Antichrist.
2
PurpleSailor3 days ago
+23
When China started welding the doors shut of people that wouldn't stay in there apartments for quarantine it's what led me to realize that there was going to be a big pandemic coming. If you see something like that happening somewhere start preparing while you still have time.
23
ExF-Altrue3 days ago
+10
Nah, it's been around in humans in argentina for a while apparently, and it didn't cause the apocalypse.
10
asmit103 days ago
+20
Kills too many of its hosts for it to spread like covid. It might spread a bit but no shits not gonna shut down again or anything like that. Many many more people will die as a % than Covid though
20
SwoopKing3 days ago
+47
Its the incredibly long incubation period that the problem.
Also I felt people would have taken covid WAY more seriously if a higher % died or you bleed out of your ears.
47
MrTagnan3 days ago
+16
An incubation period that has a large range and a short infectivity period during prodromal and symptomatic stages only, does not appear to spread asymptotically
(Specifically it seems to be capable of infecting others during a very narrow window of time around the prodromal and symptomatic stages, it’s not even fully clear if it can spread during the symptomatic stage - which on the one hand is bad because it only spreads when there’s a vague feeling of something being off, but also good because it’s such a short timeframe)
16
brokencreedman3 days ago
+5
If you thought people would take a deadliest disease more seriously, you must not be seeing the conservative reaction online to this. Over on facebook they are already spreading misinformation, lies, and treating it like a hoax. They are incredibly stupid.
5
rrrand0mmm3 days ago
+4
But at the same time, others on the other side are blowing it way out of proportion. Yeah it’s a shitty disease, but it’s not novel, and it’s tough to spread.
Covid was so easy to spread, like one of the easiest out there, a common cold type virus which is very much airborne.
4
kaityl33 days ago
+6
Don't forget about smallpox. Just because we don't have a ton of super-deadly super-contagious diseases around today, doesn't mean it can't exist. I mean this certainly seems to have a slower rate of spread than COVID, but still.
6
thisusernametakentoo2 days ago
+2
You should be angry at news in general. They used to be (For the most part) set up to provide information to the public. Today theyre just fear mongerers trying to keep you in constant state of outrage and panic so you keep tuned in so they can get their table scraps of ad revenue.
2
brokencreedman3 days ago
+2
They started working on a vaccine for this last year. Scientists are always working on new things. And health officials are all saying its not going to be a pandemic.
2
ScaryLettuce50483 days ago
+61
Why the f*** haven't they come out themselves if they have been to the infected venues or gatherings?
61
eaternallyhungry3 days ago
+54
People are inherently selfish pricks.
54
thenwetakeberlin3 days ago
+267
This seems like a good time to call out the fact that apparently hantavirus can have up to a motherfucking 45 to 60 day incubation period.
267
outoftownMD3 days ago
+130
Yikes. World Cup could be a super spreader event globally
130
brokencreedman3 days ago
+29
Thats assuming a sick person goes to the game. This IS NOT covid. It will not spread like covid.
29
lowfiswish3 days ago
+67
Um here in Texas they would absolutely go to a game and not blink.
67
Unlikely_Cabinet_8883 days ago
+5
Lots of people will be traveling from South America where the human to human strain is much more likely
5
brokencreedman3 days ago
+11
But thats acting like this disease is super common down there and infects people all the time. It doesn't. Its rare.
11
TropoMJ2 days ago
+4
Were you worried about this before the cruise ship? The virus has been endemic to South America for decades, it's had infinite opportunities to be carried out of there by South Americans going to global events (including events held in South America!) or foreigners going there on holiday and it hasn't happened.
4
frightnight82 days ago
+2
Relax! I can't possibly fathom that US authorities would be lax and underfunded enough to let this global joining event be hit with such a threat. They even have a 100% effective treatment ready ahead of time, which so happens to cure Methastatic Cancer, COVID and, last but not least, tapeworms!
2
ryguysir3 days ago
+26
As far as I've heard, it doesn't spread asymptomaticly
26
janicfeth3 days ago
+94
Which would be super reassuring if people stayed home when they were sick 🙃
94
thenwetakeberlin3 days ago
+28
Directly from the AP:
> April 25
The Dutch woman, who has symptoms of illness, takes a commercial flight from St. Helena to South Africa. The plane carries 88 passengers and crew members, according to the airline. It’s not clear how many other people who got off the MV Hondius take that flight.
> April 26
The Dutch woman dies in South Africa after collapsing at an airport while trying to board another plane home.
28
Ambitious_End_89463 days ago
+7
Woah that's a fast decline. She must have been well enough to fly home and then suddenly wasn't, which sounds similar to what happened to Betsy Hackman. She was doing errands and her usual routine and then suddenly she declined rapidly.
7
AquaMoonCoffee3 days ago
+30
Andes virus has an incubation period of 1 to 4 weeks. There are some studies that suggest it could be slightly longer, but the standard incubation period is not 45 to 60 days. The CDC itself says 4 to 42 days. With Andes virus people are generally only infectious if they are symptomatic, and transmission requires prolonged close contact (kissing, sleeping in the same bed, sitting next to one another on a long train ride, etc). Masking and washing your hands theoretically should be more than enough to prevent infection should you ever be exposed.
Edit: as an example on difficulty of transmission, the flight attendant who handled a sick passenger (who I believe has since died) has repeatedly tested negative herself.
30
thenwetakeberlin3 days ago
+24
Okay, so my bad — the Andes strain of the hantavirus specifically has up to a motherfucking 4 weeks and/or 42 day incubation period, depending on who you ask. Yes, that’s better by up to a couple weeks at the extremes (though like not much off the “45 day” window…and some studies suggest slightly longer?)… but either way, the Dutch woman took a flight and died in the airport, what, two weeks ago? And I get “prolonged close contact” but I gotta believe “stuck in a tin can together for many hours with someone who is so infected she’s on the verge of death” checks both the “close contact” and “symptomatic” boxes…and that was 50% of the shorter max incubation period ago.
I get it — let’s not have a panic. But also like, this seems to be an ongoing colossal fuckup on behalf of public health authorities and it’s time to ensure we get some unlucky-but-probably-fine motherfuckers in nice, clean, chill, fully-cost-covered quarantine with the best medical care/snacks/streaming services for the duration of those incubation periods.
24
[deleted]3 days ago
+2
[deleted]
2
zoomfast343 days ago
+19
They were all on one ship. How did they lose track to begin with?
19
CaptainObvious1102 days ago
+2
yeah
2
expotato783 days ago
+14
They would have been super easy to find if they were still on the dang boat.
14
mexican-street-tacos3 days ago
+118
The US doesn't care. They are letting the ship's passengers come back and is telling them they don't have to quarentine.
118
-Lets-Get-Weird-3 days ago
+118
That’s because the head of our health services plays in raw sewage and had a brain worm.
118
Cyniv3 days ago
+33
Don't forget the drugs he snorted off of a toilet seat.
33
EldritchTouched3 days ago
+18
And cuts off dead raccoon penises and whale heads, and puts dead bear cubs in Central Park.
18
logan-duk-dong3 days ago
+8
Don't worry, a shirtless Kid Rock will save us.
8
Imaginary-Doctor-7533 days ago
+38
According to this, the 17 Americans being flown back are going directly to the National Quarantine Unit in Nebraska.
[https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/flight-attendant-tests-negative-hantavirus-new-case-suspected-remote-i-rcna344191](https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/flight-attendant-tests-negative-hantavirus-new-case-suspected-remote-i-rcna344191)
Did you see something about that plan changing?
38
sansa_usagi3 days ago
+52
Yes, unfortunately. The CDC has since come out and said they don’t plan to make anyone quarantine.
https://www.ketv.com/article/americans-from-hantavirus-cruise-ship-may-not-face-mandatory-quarantine/71260032
52
Imaginary-Doctor-7533 days ago
+20
Thanks for that. That is unfortunate.
20
AquaMoonCoffee3 days ago
+10
I definitely agree they should be a bit more cautious, but to be realistic here there are over 200 people on that ship and in the span of 39 days only six of them have gotten sick. Even people who handled the sick passengers themselves have not gotten sick. A lot of media outlets are genuinely over playing the risk of the virus becoming a pandemic; it does have a very high mortality rate so that does warrant caution for the passengers of the ship and for people who were in direct prolonged close contact with the infected. But this is not a covid situation. The only way this virus could rapidly spread and become a global pandemic is if people actively try to spread it. It's not a new virus or a new strain.
10
mexican-street-tacos3 days ago
+24
The problem is that it's too soon to clear these people. They might not have symptoms for 2 months. The first guy who died on the ship...his wife didn't have symptoms until weeks later, and then she got on a plane while infectious and wound up dying.
24
AquaMoonCoffee3 days ago
+11
You can test for Andes virus without being symptomatic. A blood test is used which can detect it with or without symptoms. That's why not everyone is needing to wait an entire month or two. The flight attendant was already cleared even though it's been like 2 days because she received a blood test and it came back negative.
11
mexican-street-tacos3 days ago
+2
I think I read that they aren't testing them unless they have symptoms.
2
ObjectiveAide95523 days ago
+10
they were on the ship, how the f*** after what we went through with covid do we lose track of people? countries accepting sick passengers need to follow a strict protocol, and those that do not should instantly be denied entry for the whole country to any other country. can’t get your basic shit together? too bad for your whole country then. unacceptable level of incompetence, no place in society for such.
10
disdainfulsideeye3 days ago
+47
If only there was a group of scientists who responsible for detecting and investigating these sort of things ahead of time. Oh yeah, there was such a group, but most of them were unfortunately fired by DOGE and the administration.
47
Big-Independence44453 days ago
+81
Track down? How the hell did you possibly lose track of them?
81
dod66663 days ago
+73
>The ship made several stops before the virus was identified
73
OneTwoThreeFourFf3 days ago
+17
Right, but presumably the ship would know who these people are and have multiple ways to contact them. For how long this thing has been in the news, this just seems like yet another sensationalist headline.
17
PolloConTeriyaki3 days ago
+15
They let them go cause they had no symptoms.
15
Silver_Middle_72403 days ago
+10
Definitely the right call with a disease with a 2 month incubation period.
10
Hyronious3 days ago
+15
They didn't know that there was a serious disease to be worried about when they left is what I'm reading.
15
sakatan3 days ago
+8
I'd just like to add that they suspect cases on the island of Tristan da Cunha.
Tristan. Da. Cunha. They had to literally airdrop military physicians by parachute from an A400M that had to be refueled *in the air* because it's that remote.
Tristan da Cunha
How. *Hoooooow*...
8
CaptainObvious1102 days ago
+2
Yeah it's really a remote area that honestly should be safe
2
sleigh_queen2 days ago
+3
I read that an infected passenger lives there
3
broomindustpan2 days ago
+7
Why were these passengers not immediately quarantined after getting off the ship?
7
CompleteSavings63073 days ago
+21
At this point, don't they know they were on the ship that had the outbreak? Are they refusing to come forward?
If they are, they should be held accountable and charged criminally
21
GeneralCommand44593 days ago
+4
Don’t they know who was on the boat? Presumably they have a passenger and crew list and phone numbers?
4
wowitshemlock2 days ago
+4
I think we have experienced far too many "once in a lifetime" events at this point...
4
realrimurutempest3 days ago
+31
Could have just kept them on the ship, no?
31
Tribalbob3 days ago
+55
There were a number of people who left the ship well before they even suspected the virus.
55
brickyardjimmy3 days ago
+12
The time to track them was when they were still on the boat. All in one place.
12
DiveCat3 days ago
+7
You mean before they even knew anyone was sick? An old man died, as old men do, and they didn’t know there was an issue of hantavirus until his wife got sick traveling home.
7
crappydeli3 days ago
+8
Meanwhile RFK sits around picking his nose.
8
spacetimebear3 days ago
+3
Why don't they send Taron Egerton to find them?
3
Ambitious_End_89463 days ago
+2
hahahaha
2
Flybook3 days ago
+3
f*** they doin they had one job
3
BabyScreamBear3 days ago
+3
Maybe should’ve been ‘underway’ 2 weeks ago
3
HNL2BOS2 days ago
+3
I'm very confused about this whole thing. Is the ship even the epicenter(?) of this outbreak or did these people happen to get infected elsewhere (along with others) and just happen to be on the cruise which led to more infections ...all while other infections are happening elsewhere.
3
No-Safe-58453 days ago
+3
At this point we need a designated place to quarantine these cruises. They let them off in Japan the first time around.
3
Liatin112 days ago
+4
Jab 2.0 let's goooooooooooooo
4
Tenacious_Tenrec2 days ago
+2
DING, DING, DING!!
Round 2!!
Here we go again. I’m just gonna go hide away for a while.
2
Affectionate-Jury2102 days ago
+2
This is what happens when you have a clown "in charge" of our Department of Health.
2
Pixie16fire3 days ago
+5
Incompetent policies
5
lingeringneutrophil3 days ago
+3
There are two things getting mixed up: hantavirus (you get it from vermin urine typically, rather common in US Southwest), but does not typically spread to other humans, and Andes variant of this virus which DOES spread between humans.
It is two different viruses getting mixed up on the chatter and that is what is causing all these problems.
All in all, not another covid situation, because it’s nowhere near as infectious, but we just need to be vigilant and make sure we take precautions.
3
Mountainenthusiast23 days ago
+3
Meanwhile releasing the ones on the ship back to their home countries ok
3
Weak-Representative83 days ago
+4
For the life of me, I don't know why they didn't just leave [everyone](https://hantavirusnow.com/90-second-reads/hantavirus-cruise-ship-passengers-begin-disembarking-live-updates-forbes/) on the cruise ship for a couple more weeks. I know it would suck, yes, but, we could have avoided it. I felt like in COVID, if we just stayed locked down for the rest of that year, it couldn't been so damaging and people would be alive till this day.
4
Upset-Somewhere30893 days ago
+3
I'm 100% sure that some people would just hide and not come forward, infecting others in the process!
3
njman1002 days ago
+2
And the US will F*** it all up
2
indypuyami2 days ago
+3
Global but not in the US.
https://apnews.com/article/cdc-hantavirus-cruise-ship-trump-who-2eaf686534d31e8ad67482f05e1ec870
https://www.ketv.com/article/americans-from-hantavirus-cruise-ship-may-not-face-mandatory-quarantine/71260032
3
AdventurousGuest3082 days ago
+4
I thought the rules were global, no internal us
4
boring_mundane2 days ago
+3
Kinda surprising how 2 years ago monkeypox was in the news everywhere. People were scared to travel.
And now hantavirus. I hope it’s not something people will worry in 2-3 months….
I also pray they find a cure for those who are affected by hantavirus.
(Trying to calm my anxious mind)
3
tractorpatty3 days ago
+5
My first thought, you just let them off the boat to venture out on planes trains and busses after all that....da fuk
5
DiveCat3 days ago
+4
Because they didn’t even know there was an issue when these people got off the boat. Of course they got off, their trips were over.
An old man died. Old men die. That alone is not enough to think a whole cruise needs to be quarantined. His wife left the boat. She got sick on the way home. That is when they found out they were dealing with hantavirus.
4
travisjudegrant3 days ago
+3
If it is such a big deal (and I am by no means suggesting it isn’t), why let them walk away in the first place? Are we really this stupid? Or are we going to find that Moderna has been working on a hantavirus vaccine and stand to make billions?
3
Senior-Reality-253 days ago
+3
Soooo have the hantavirus deniers crawled out of the woodwork yet?
200 Comments