That’s why they’re trying to pass laws to block democracy like the SAVE Act. Are we going to let them?
785
jwr1111Mar 23, 2026
+201
They are reduced to lying, cheating, and gaslighting America.
201
PatronSaintOfCuntsMar 23, 2026
+98
Exactly, and they don’t really give a shit if Democrats or Republicans are unhappy, because they plan to steal the rest of the elections. Remember “you won’t have to vote again”? We’re there.
98
specqqMar 23, 2026
+15
The rest of the elections that they bother to have.
15
LostInSpace-2245Mar 23, 2026
+2
If that happens, we won’t let it happen quietly.
2
Psycholama972Mar 23, 2026
Yes you will
0
TheSavouryRainMar 23, 2026
+7
There's a quote attributed to Churchill (which was probably never actually said by him) that says "you can trust America to do the right thing, after they've tried everything else."
I do believe that we'll do something about what's going on, it's just going to take the shit really hitting the fan.
7
P1xelHunter78Mar 24, 2026
+1
The defecation is pretty close to oscillation at this point. People are pretty pissed.
1
joet889Mar 23, 2026
+3
I'm sure if you were here you'd show us how it's done.
3
Psycholama972Mar 24, 2026
+1
I’m just saying bring back that George Floyd anger.
1
RobonianBattlebotMar 24, 2026
+1
The people burning shit and being desteuctive during George Floyd were provovateurs. Otherwise it was protests, which we are doing, so I am not sure what youre getting at.
Also, what change did the George Floyd protests bring about. Just curious.
1
Psycholama972Mar 24, 2026
+1
It kept people talking about the protests constantly and reminded everyone why they were happening, I did not even know that large protests were happening in America still.
1
Ja1axMar 24, 2026
+1
It made the slogan and t shirt printers richer.
1
Broken-Digital-ClockMar 23, 2026
+22
They have been for decades. Eisenhower was probably the last to work in somewhat good faith.
22
WavecrestRdMar 23, 2026
+15
You skipped Carter. That's why they tore him down so hard. They chose to not help him. So much money is against progression. Against making the working class secure.
15
Broken-Digital-ClockMar 23, 2026
+7
I meant GOP presidents.
7
WavecrestRdMar 23, 2026
+2
sorry. for me...Ike doesn't count anymore.
2
SalishShoreMar 23, 2026
+2
They are engineering a serfdom.
2
Rusted_atlasMar 23, 2026
+6
What do you mean reduced too? They've been this way since Regan
6
Chemical-Swing-420Mar 23, 2026
+3
...for the past 60 years.
3
GJdevoMar 23, 2026
+2
Reduced to? Thats modus operandi.
2
GaylrdFockerMar 24, 2026
+1
Reduced to? That's all they've been doing for years
1
ElfVira666Mar 24, 2026
+1
So business as usual.
1
MaldingapeMar 23, 2026
+33
They aren’t trying to pass have SAVE act at this point.
It’s theater to energize and radicalize their base, to give themselves a justification for rejecting the likely disastrous results of the midterms. It’s ground work for “doing what must be done” to retain power after they lose the election.
33
PatronSaintOfCuntsMar 23, 2026
+9
I can see that, I think all of this is just to see how much they can get away with.
9
GonzoVeritasMar 23, 2026
+9
> Are we going to let them?
Hell no
It's worthy of taking to the streets, in a very serious way, and we should all be ready for that
9
IrrelevantLeprechaunMar 23, 2026
+11
If we lose midterms we riot. Simple as that. That's a line in the sand they simply cannot cross.
11
Hidden_PothosMar 23, 2026
+11
With Chuck Schumer.... I would give it a coin flip.
11
beegtunaMar 24, 2026
+1
Fetterman will do everything to f*** over those who put him in office
1
ThisMacAttacksMar 24, 2026
+1
I hate to say it but most Americans won’t know what’s going on until it’s too late
1
NUMBerONEisFIRSTMar 24, 2026
+1
No Kings events all over America March 28th.
1
Asleep_Management900Mar 23, 2026
+7
The SAVE act will actually hurt 5 red states the most, disenfranchising women voters who married and took the last name of their husband thus disqualifying them.
This isn't about the SAVE act at all but the CHAOS it brings allowing Vance to not certify the next election assuming a Democrat wins.
7
ibelieveyouwoodMar 24, 2026
+1
Won't hurt where it's not enforced. Selective enforcement is a planned feature for all GOP "rules". Just like how ICE is trying to stave off false immigrant uprisings in blue states, and specifically blue cities, but has apparently no idea immigrants live in red areas.
1
CoolBakedBeanMar 24, 2026
+1
as long as they’re already registered then it doesn’t matter right?
1
Asleep_Management900Mar 24, 2026
+1
If your birth certificate says Broidigumschmertz as your maiden name, and your State ID says Wilcox-Broidigumschmertz as your married name, then you won't be able to vote (assuming you don't have a passport)
1
GB715Mar 23, 2026
+2
no
2
Dr4gonflyMar 24, 2026
+1
“yeah, probably”
-Chuck Schumer
1
IrrelevantLeprechaunMar 24, 2026
+1
Let them how? Tf you expect me to do about it
1
sausagemouseMar 24, 2026
+1
Of course you are. This is America we're talking about.
1
OriginalCDubMar 24, 2026
+1
Chuck Schumer will send another strongly worded letter.
1
1cl3nstd4ytMar 23, 2026
+257
Easiest way to know when a Republican is scared...
... _they try to make it about trans people._
It's all they got.
257
BlondeBorednBakedMar 23, 2026
+80
And it works because republicans voters are terrible people.
80
Chemical-Fault-7331Mar 23, 2026
+58
Terrible and stupid people
58
blaqsupamanMar 24, 2026
+1
I feel like the tide is starting to turn on that one. Even that's starting to lose its juice for them.
1
BlondeBorednBakedMar 24, 2026
+1
Republicans hate trans people enough to take licenses away, kick them out of the military, make it a felony for them to use the bathroom, outlaw hormones for trans kids, kick trans kids out of sports, revoke passports, out trans kids to their parents. I don’t think that is going to go away just because people are paying more for gas.
1
Wasabiwabi_Mar 23, 2026
+15
But somehow have no concerns over the real sexual deviant right in front of their faces.
15
oiseaua20Mar 23, 2026
+86
At this point, they would rather nominate a literal cactus than suggest a policy that 60% of the country actually likes.
86
BakedadsMar 23, 2026
+10
Yet they control all branches of government. What does this tell you about our "democracy"?
10
IrrelevantLeprechaunMar 24, 2026
+1
It tells me that midterms are their greatest fear because it's going to lose them all their power.
1
quadralienMar 23, 2026
+1
Meglos would be a better leader, too!
1
SerfTintMar 23, 2026
-5
This has largely been both parties for a couple of decades now. Look at how much of the party was still hoping and praying for Andrew Cuomo to win in NYC. Cuomo, who had helped enable eight statehouse Democrats to vote as a block of Republicans so that they could kill Progressive legislation before it got to his desk. Cuomo, the sexual harasser with the giant terrible COVID scandal, who wanted to be Netanyahu's pro bono lawyer. Cuomo, who used AI to make an ad about Zohran willfully causing another 9/11. It wasn't the whole party, but it was the party's leaders that were entirely allergic--panicked!!!--about a politician those policies were actually popular, even in a race where no Republican viably had a chance to win.
Both parties serve the corporate elite, which are very unpopular because their interests are almost unfailingly the opposite of the interests of the average citizen. So they're both fully committed to nominating people who are hostile to popular policies. It just happens that the Generic Democrat message is as a baseline somewhat less hideous than the Generic Republican message, but neither party's leadership is the slightest bit interested in appealing to the majority of the citizenry.
-5
AwesomePurplePantsMar 23, 2026
+26
It has not been both parties.
Like, Democrats tried to do public healthcare, and at least managed to get a crappy version. Which did [objectively help people](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5886019/).
Does this mean I’m arguing for a strawman that the Democrats are perfect? No. People should be losing their shit at them demanding more.
Do they still have a ridiculously better track record of genuinely helping the majority than Republicans? Yes!
Like, how bad do things have to get before we realize that the lesser evil *is less evil*?
26
Shopping_GeneralMar 23, 2026
+1
The Democrats should be holding press conferences every week calling him a lying pervert. And bring receipts. And hope the button paid for corporate media puts it on.
1
IrrelevantLeprechaunMar 24, 2026
+1
Well for one thing, such conferences wouldn't sway MAGA voters, and it wouldn't be anything new to leftist voters.
And for another thing, most American media is owned by MAGA now, so there wouldn't be anywhere for democrats to televise or broadcast it. They're effectively shut out of the television market.
1
SerfTintMar 23, 2026
-3
I am not arguing that the lesser evil is not less evil, nor that the two parties are the same--as I said, the baseline for Democrats is "ehh, ok, somewhat better healthcare if it still helps and actually further entrenches the private markets, but it does happen to help people also," while the baseline for Republicans is "die in the street unless you are rich, you're a scourge on society anyway so no one will miss you."
But on the subject of Israel, for one--something like 90% of the base dislikes Israel, and a giant percentage of them are saying "no weapons for them, no money, they're going to behave and follow international law or we're not going to support them." What is the position of elected Democrats? Biden: Full on, 100% total support for Israel. Harris: "I frown at Israel's worst activities, but let's focus 80% of our attention on October 7th." Schumer: "My number one job is to make sure that Democrats support Israel. Not to fight Trump, but to make sure that Israel gets completely funded." Jeffries is enabling AIPAC money to get to his preferred Congressional candidates so that they can defeat anti-Zionist challengers. 90% to 10%, and most of the elected party is on the 10% side. This is a policy that well more than 60% of the base supports, but the party will do apparently absolutely anything to make sure that they don't adopt it as polcy.
Cannabis rescheduling was vastly popular--Biden had 4 years and dragged his feet the entire way until the very end of his term. A $15 minimum wage was deeply popular, but it appears evident that Biden sided with the 8 Senate Democrats that killed it in 2021, even though it had a chance to pass. When the TPP was deeply unpopular with both parties, Obama was still pushing it, not to mention making 94% of the hideous and unpopular Bush tax cuts permanent, not to mention trying to stay in Iraq beyond 2011 at a time when it was vastly unpopular, not to mention the Grand Bargain, where he himself floated the idea of cutting Social Security. Dianne Feinstein helped fast-track Amy Coney Barrett onto the SCOTUS a week before the election.
So it's not on every policy. But these aren't outlier Democrats, they're the standard-bearers for the party. And quite often, they will fight with every fiber of their being to not have to advocate for popular policies, even if they would be a slam dunk. Harris may have lost the election because of her Israel stance, probably knew that she was likely to throw away Michigan just on this issue, and still doubled down on it. So it isn't ABOUT Republicans, it is about the fact that both parties are driven maniacally to back policies that nobody wants, and in the case of Democrats, it is TOTALLY INEXPLICABLE, since their base happens to want the popular policies and would show up at the polls more (cf. Zohran), and the leadership STILL won't push for them.
-3
AwesomePurplePantsMar 23, 2026
+3
I’m afraid that at this point my response to these concerns is basically “So what?”
No, the Democrats do not 100% support Zionist aggression. For example, I’m confident they’d vote to ban further unprovoked attacks on Iran. I’m confident they’d be threatening to stop supplying Israel with ammunition if they keep expanding the conflict into Lebanon if they had the power to do so.
If people felt a need to do a symbolic rebuke of democrats by promoting not voting over Gaza because they were sure Trump wouldn’t win or wouldn’t be so bad then fine. It was rather gut wrenching, and hindsight about how terrible the alternative turned out to be is 20/20.
But the evidence today is so stark that continuing that line of attack is aiding and abetting the greater evil.
No, the slimeball politicians who’ll at least come to the bargaining table to restrain Trump is a bloody saint compared to the Republicans who don’t give a shit beyond being too ashamed to go on record about it.
3
SerfTintMar 23, 2026
+1
First, I am DEFINITELY not confident that Democrats will vote to ban further unprovoked attacks. I am DEFINITELY not confident that they'll threaten to, let alone actually, stop supporting Israel with ammunition for Lebanon. We may just have a fundamental disagreement there. Schumer SUPPORTS this war, according to reporting. He supported unconditional aid to Israel when they were literally starving children--why would he suddenly not support them attacking Iran or Lebanon? What is an "unprovoked attack" to our leaders anyway, if they can just say "Israel has the right to defend herself against Hezbollah and the Ayatollah, lest they attack Israel if they show weakness. Besides, Iran has been attacking Israel this entire time, that is sufficient provocation. It isn't unprovoked at all."
If you're going to pick a topic that paints the Democrats in a comparatively positive light, this isn't the one. If they're so committed to stop supplying Israel with ammunition, Biden could have made this clear in a 5-minute phone call and the genocide would have stopped immediately. "You drop another bomb on a school and we're boycotting all Israeli products for the next 5 years, and you can fight your wars yourself from now on," and that's the end of Israel sabre-rattling about Iran and Lebanon. But Biden didn't do this, Harris didn't indicate that she would do this, most Democrats didn't call out this practice, and they're STILL not saying even now that they're not going to fund this war. "The president has to come to Congress and give us a reason" is not a No, and it's not like they're trying to put pressure on Trump to stop this war, Democratic leadership is barely even out there on TV to say things like this.
Second, I want to defeat the greater evil. You do that by getting people to vote for Democrats, and you do that by pressuring Democrats to be a party that connects with voters. I think their approval rating is still below Trump's right now. We've tried saying "everyone just be quiet about Democrats, aim all of your attacks at Republicans and praise Democrats for everything," and it doesn't work. Trump not only continues to win elections, his numbers keep GROWING in every cycle.
You need to call out Democrats and either get them to improve or find better Democrats, because they are totally unfit to fight against fascism, they have shown this 1000 times in a row. They don't even understand the moment, let alone how to fight against it, let alone having the will to actually do what this requires. I'm trying to HELP them defeat the greater evil. They're never going to get that message if all their voters give them is "You guys are bloody saints, keep doing exactly what you're doing because it's better than Trump." People have shown that they're not motivated enough to support the lesser evil, especially when on some issues, they're still pretty damn evil.
1
SalishShoreMar 23, 2026
+1
Our system is broken. Citizens United and gerrymandering changed everything. Both of those were brought to us by laser focused Republicans working away at it for decades.
Democrats were feckless this entire time. Now they have to work within a system they were ineffectual at stopping.
We need younger, better Democrats. The system is now designed to make sure that never happens.
1
SerfTintMar 24, 2026
+1
Absolutely. Republicans took the lead on this with the Powell memo and the late 70's SCOTUS decisions, and then it was a 5-4 Republican decision on Citizens United. However, it is not factual when people say that the Democrats were innocent little lambs. Tony Coelho in 1980 had the opportunity to reject corporate money and instead fight Republicans on the principles of them being corrupt, but he decided that Democrats should instead try to outcompete Republicans for corporate money, and this begat the DLC age and Bill Clinton spending most of his presidency selling out the Democratic Party and aligning it with Center Right corporate power.
Coehlo's protege in the House? Steny Hoyer, who was STILL pushing for the party to bathe itself in corporate money as late as the middle of the Biden presidency.
It wasn't just that Republicans were laser-focused, it's that the Democrats simply didn't care enough to fight. "Feckless" may be overly kind, vs. "complicit."
1
Shopping_GeneralMar 23, 2026
+1
BoTh SiDeS!!!... The last refuge of the intellectually challenged.
1
SerfTintMar 24, 2026
+1
Giving a "both sides" argument when it is unwarranted is obviously a bad take. In this case, it IS warranted. Both sides can't possibly do something wrong, every single comment has to choose a side? Obama supported cutting Social Security. Romney supported cutting Social Security. What political analysis is it if people can't say "both sides supported cutting Social Security"? Does that sentence have to come with "The Romneys put their dog on a car roof?"
It's not sports, it's news. It is absolutely true that Democrats very often support policies that their base hates, because they serve their corporate donors more than they serve their base. So 60% support means just as little for them in those cases as it means for Republicans. You may not like the fact that this is inconvenient to a comic book good vs. evil narrative, but it is true.
1
Er3bus13Mar 24, 2026
+1
Both sides DERP. /eyeroll
1
SerfTintMar 24, 2026
+1
Ok, but it's true. I don't know why this sub is insistent that people lie and claim that Democrats writ large at a elected caucus support only popular policy, listen to their base all the time, and have a cordial and supportive relationship with Progressive politicians that promote popular agenda items. None of this is remotely true, but because Republicans are worse, apparently Democrats can have no standards at all, and everyone has to twist reality to show them in an eternally positive light.
1
Colonel-MooseknuckleMar 23, 2026
+130
They should be desperate. Their legacy is now tied to defending a 34x felon/child molester, and dragging us into an unnecessary war that will create a new generation of people that want to do us harm.
F*** the GOP and their diddling leader.
130
ElysiumSproutsMar 23, 2026
+22
Trump's time has passed. It's time for him to resign and self deport.
22
Helpful-Toe5101Mar 23, 2026
+14
Self deport to Iran, They'll be happy to have him.
14
StevenMC19Mar 23, 2026
+8
Send him to Tel Aviv. See if he has friends like he thinks he does.
8
runawaydoctorateMar 23, 2026
+6
Nah. He can go to Moscow and hang with Assad.
6
SalishShoreMar 23, 2026
+1
I hope they send pictures of their hangouts so we can at least get a good laugh.
1
TurbomattkMar 24, 2026
+1
Self deport to hell
1
a_little_hazel_nutsMar 23, 2026
+23
The GOP have no ideas that are for the good of the population. They spread propaganda to create enemies out of immigrants and lesbians and now after ICE has supposedly made everyone safe, they have no more problems to solve. So they create problems and it's becoming noticeable to everybody, even stupid people are noticing.
23
Prize_Proof5332Mar 23, 2026
+23
have they tried....you know....just not being evil?
23
Imaginary-Ad-7919Mar 23, 2026
+21
You can practically hear the panic baked into that headline.
21
BulwarkOnlineMar 23, 2026
+28
It’s SAVE America Act month, and I can’t stop thinking about dog food.
As in, Republicans have a [dog-food problem](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/marcrandolph_nothing-matters-if-the-dogs-dont-eat-the-activity-7069136572163502081-NeYC/). They’re serving up food that dogs won’t eat. The obvious solution is to change the recipe, but no way. They’re desperate to win and hold power, yet that’s the last thing they’ll consider.
28
1cl3nstd4ytMar 23, 2026
+7
I blame the DNC for this. /s
7
Saucy_Man11Mar 23, 2026
+3
You say */s* now, but just wait for primary season. Democrats infighting is what got us into this mess in the first place.
3
mosesoperandiMar 24, 2026
+1
That's kind of nonsense. Republicans literally got us into this. Republicans stood up a massive disinformation system first through Fox News, and then through digital media. Republicans selected Trump as their candidate in 2016. Republicans accepted election interference from Russia in 2016. Republicans refused to remove and bar Trump from office in 2020.
Democrats need to get their act together, but blaming Democrats for getting us into this is the least helpful take since Republicans have done all of the harm.
1
Chemical-Fault-7331Mar 23, 2026
+8
As long as the GOP gets to maintain their majority on the Supreme Court, and the Senate still favors shithole conservative states with hardly anyone living in them, nothing will change. Nothing is going to change in this country until it finally collapses under the weight of its own debt and military imperialism. And to be honest, it needs to collapse. Let these shithole Republican states deal with the consequences of their own actions.
8
literallytwistedMar 23, 2026
+3
I reluctantly agree, We will have to hit rock bottom before enough people are forced to embrace change. Until then most people will just muddle through and hope nothing happens to them personally.
3
SalishShoreMar 24, 2026
+1
The rich will buy up all the pieces and make a permanent serfdom out of the ashes.
1
TheHumanGnomeProjectMar 23, 2026
+12
This headline is pure bullshit. The people that vote Republican don't ever give a second thought to any candidates from other parties. Full stop.
12
IrrelevantLeprechaunMar 23, 2026
+5
Their approval rate has been CRATERING recently. They have barely enough support to keep going.
5
Asleep_Management900Mar 24, 2026
+1
This. I watched a YouTube vid in which the interviewer went to some Red state and the farmer lady was crying crocodile tears that Trump did this, or Trump did that. But when asked if it was a Redo of the Election, she said she just couldn't ever vote for Harris, indicating that she still was a Trumper to the end. Ride or Die.
1
AustinSpartanMar 23, 2026
+13
Don't worry the small brained Americans will vote them back into power in 6 years
13
shadowriku459Mar 23, 2026
+10
Yet their voters will stick to them in the end.
Big whoop.
10
memphisjonesMar 23, 2026
+3
Hence why they will do everything they can to steal the election. They are already test running having ICE agents patrol the airports.
3
FantasticBicycle37Mar 23, 2026
+3
Dearborn Michigan is going to have work twice as hard to get republicans elected this time around
3
npsageMar 23, 2026
+2
Turns out when the very best policies you were offering the average person were nothing but bread and circuses; people get real upset when you suddenly start declaring they need to sacrifice their bread and circuses for…a thing. Just trust it it’s worth the sacrifice.
2
ToadfingerMar 23, 2026
+2
More traitorous! More cowardly!
2
HVACStackMar 23, 2026
+2
Sidenote why doesn't he look orange here lol
2
SwagHolocaustReturnsMar 23, 2026
+2
But how did they get that thumbnail tho
2
wave_of_Mar 23, 2026
+2
I want to ask an honest question and hope that those of you on the right will understand why I’m asking. Do you care that we (the citizens of the United States of America) are all part of a representative democracy? We all have rights guaranteed to us under our system of Government. These rights are being taken from us, stripped away from us. At what point will you accept that in order to win in a free and fair election you must govern wisely? Why try to reshape this democracy into an autocracy? You must know that you are undermining the very principles you claim to live by. We are Americans. We are supposed to be united in the fight for good, for equality, for the poor, for freedom from tyranny and oppression. These are our basic tenets. Forgot party, forget Trump. You are American first. You have a duty to do your best and defend liberty and justice for everyone. All of us do. Rise to it.
2
IrrelevantLeprechaunMar 24, 2026
+1
I explicitly voted against Trump. I warned everyone about this. I've already done my part, and the madness that has occured is NOT on my shoulders. I didn't ask for this, and neither did 70m other voters. Why should we be held accountable for something we expressly tried to avoid?
1
Calm_Chemist_4952Mar 24, 2026
+1
More unpopular, more desperate, more greedy, more evil, more fascist, more paranoid, the list goes on and on.
1
reddit_is_kayfabeMar 24, 2026
+1
And yet...
[RealClearPolling average, Republican Party, through 03/16: -14.6](https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/favorability/republican-party).
[RealClearPolling average, Democratic Party, through 03/16: -19.6](https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/favorability/democratic-party).
I voted for Bill Clinton twice, Al Gore, John Kerry, Barack Obama twice, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. I am *f****** incensed* that Schumer and Jeffries can look at these polls showing the DNC *five points behind the RNC during the days of Trump* and not step down. They are everything that's wrong with the Democratic Party and if they gave one shit about America, they would both resign immediately in abject shame and never show their faces in Washington DC again.
The steady rightward tilt of America, the steady descent to becoming the Russia of the western hemisphere, will continue until the Democratic Party can *get its shit together* and lead us out of this mess.
1
Yahobo420Mar 24, 2026
+1
Is that the face he makes when he shits his pants?
1
mev186Mar 24, 2026
+1
The solution is very simple: throw the orange buffoon to the wolves.
1
MemitimMar 24, 2026
+1
Republicans have been violating the fundamental laws of the United States in service to committing human rights violations and threatening those they perceive as political enemies while working to subvert democracy. That's not politics, that's terrorism.
1
CensoredbytheGOPMar 24, 2026
+1
Tell me about it.
1
splycedaddyMar 23, 2026
+1
Let me know when they stop winning the presidential election
1
MgnmgnmgMar 23, 2026
+1
Who is paying the Iranians for all the damage done to their country?
1
thinpileMar 23, 2026
+1
All in at this point because they know they're completely screwed.
1
IrrelevantLeprechaunMar 23, 2026
+1
They know they're doomed and they're resorting to snap decisions and panicked ideas to save themselves. It's all just desperation in the face of the reality that midterms are inevitably going to land them all in jail.
And through their sheer incompetence, they keep f****** up their own defenses. The harder they try, the worst they make it for themselves. Their allies are jumping ship left and right, they're losing their voters, and their entire regime is collapsing. They're done for.
1
honeygrimeMar 23, 2026
+1
I’m really curious if this is true. Where I live, there are still regular protests by Trumpers and they’re all over local Facebook posts. I live in Northern California btw. I had a guy at work tell me the other day we have a ‘really clear purpose in Iran and clear timeline to get out’. A lot of people here still support Trump. It doesn’t seem like his popularity has been affected here. So I have a hard time believing these kinds of articles.
1
SalishShoreMar 24, 2026
+1
I don’t remember where I heard or read this but something like 75% of comments on Facebook are bots or paid disinformation activists.
I have no idea if this is true. It certainly seems plausible.
1
Asleep_Management900Mar 23, 2026
+1
The Nuclear Option, is always an option.
1
church-rosserMar 24, 2026
+1
he could red button himself and solve a lot of his own problems for the rest of us. something i had a dream about the other night. definitely wouldn't want that to happen, and certainly wouldn't advocate for it, but i guess it wouldn't be so bad if it did. at least it would occur in accordance to the terms and conditions of reddit's rules.
1
Mand125Mar 24, 2026
+1
They know that if they lose power now they’ll never get it back.
1
Potential-Evening222Mar 24, 2026
+1
Do you think the word 'desperate' is appropriate, or a bit too much?
1
CivilWay1444Mar 24, 2026
+1
MAGATs love eating Trump's c***.
1
maninazolMar 24, 2026
+1
no surprise there
1
I-need-ur-dick-picsMar 24, 2026
+1
…yet will remain all powerful
1
ninjapro98Mar 23, 2026
-4
Anyone else notice lately how many of the top comments on every single post are made by accounts that are less than 6 months old? And often times they already have thousands of Karma
-4
SalishShoreMar 24, 2026
+1
I have noticed. The bot army and Cambridge Analytica never went away.
1
IrrelevantLeprechaunMar 24, 2026
+1
Why does it matter? The top comments are usually sympathetic to the people anyway.
1
ninjapro98Mar 24, 2026
+1
Because it’s weird? Accounts with hidden post history that are new commenting to try and form peoples opinion is weird. Even if they are generally speaking agreeing with you it’s uncomfortable that so much of the internet and “people” we talk to online don’t seem to be real anymore
1
IrrelevantLeprechaunMar 24, 2026
+1
Only thing I can't level on is the hidden post history angle. Mine is hidden because I was sick and tired of Reddit debates ending up with "haha you subscribe to [niche subreddit], nobody should listen to you." Hell, way back when I was in middle school, everyone insisted that the best internet etiquette was keeping all your info and activity as private as possible.
Now we have people acting like nobody should hide anything from anyone because "if you have nothing to hide, why hide at all."
I just don't see it as a valid criticism. Privacy is always a good thing.
117 Comments