· 176 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 30, 2026 at 10:14 PM

Gulf allies privately make the case to Trump to keep fighting until Iran is decisively defeated

Posted by Immediate-Link490


Gulf allies privately make the case to Trump to keep fighting until Iran is decisively defeated
AP News
Gulf allies privately make the case to Trump to keep fighting until Iran is decisively defeated
Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and other Gulf allies of the United States are urging President Donald Trump to keep prosecuting his war against Iran, saying the month of strikes has not weakened Tehran enough.

🚩 Report this post

176 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
grasshopper239 Mar 30, 2026 +1639
They are free to send their sons there to fight
1639
Rich_Tax1597 Mar 30, 2026 +514
Why would they ever bother doing that when the Idiot in Chief will do it for you if you say the right word and give him some money on the side?
514
Puzzleheaded-Fun7808 Mar 30, 2026 +136
if they give him a big trophy he will do anything
136
ineyeseekay Mar 30, 2026 +33
Jet counts. Done.
33
ForeverFingers Mar 31, 2026 +12
He wants a statue now too
12
Tr1pla Mar 31, 2026 +6
The biggest arch
6
MyDadsGlassesCase Mar 30, 2026 +46
\> he Idiot in Chief will do it for you if you say the right word "I bet you Biden would have helped us"
46
justiceformahsa Mar 31, 2026 +11
Obama triggers Trump much more, they should use that one.
11
Evil_Dry_frog Mar 30, 2026 +14
Think they just need the money.
14
Horat1us_UA Mar 30, 2026 +17
Money is all it takes to buy American army nowadays
17
Sky_Ninja1997 Mar 30, 2026 +10
That and a c**** medal or trophy
10
Cobs85 Mar 30, 2026 +9
Gives some context to that bribery tour the Trump family took to the Middle East.
9
halfcookies Mar 30, 2026 +3
Or a shitload of Mumm’s
3
DistanceToEmpty Mar 30, 2026 +50
These are militaries that really only meant to repress their own people and where advancement is by patronage not merit. Sending them to fight along side US troops would probably somehow result in more Americans killed, not less.
50
Nokrai Mar 31, 2026 +20
You act as if our administration really cares about that.
20
SeaworthinessSome454 Mar 31, 2026 +13
They wouldn’t do a mixed front line. The foreign militaries would be sent in on their own to a different site. Coordinating between 2 different militaries (and languages) is way too hard. Same reason why the US and Israel are striking different parts of Iran, not a coordinated attack on one site.
13
forShizAndGigz00001 Mar 30, 2026 +63
Saudis wont be sending their own sons they have slaves for that.
63
InvestigatorOk9354 Mar 31, 2026 +32
Netanyahu if willing to commit another 20,000 US Marines to the Gulf
32
bilyl Mar 30, 2026 +16
This is eerily similar to WWI when countries get sucked into war
16
Bubbles_2025 Mar 31, 2026 +4
That’s what I was saying in another thread. SA has a defense pact with Pakistan, who would be drawn in if the Saudis begin fighting. Thats why Pakistan has been trying to mediate a ceasefire agreement in Islamabad.
4
lonestar-rasbryjamco Mar 30, 2026 +47
Saudis wouldn’t even send their sons to pick up the dry cleaning.
47
loralailoralai Mar 31, 2026 +5
To be fair, either would trump
5
PoutinePirate Mar 31, 2026 +6
Their sons all have bone spurs.
6
ZerochildX23 Mar 30, 2026 +21
The sons will pay their way out & force their ~~slaves~~ servants to take their place.
21
Traditional_Drama_91 Mar 30, 2026 +7
Sorry, Sudanese mercenary machine broke
7
Kathdath Mar 31, 2026 +5
The name 'Saudi Arabia' refers to Arabia belonging to the Saud family. Arabians may die, but Saud deaths is unacceptable
5
ShredOrSigh Mar 30, 2026 +5
A coalition of the willing.
5
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 +28
[removed]
28
Sure-Record-8093 Mar 30, 2026 +12
A 50 year deal with Saudi Arabia in 1973 that expired and was not renewed in 2023
12
RareBid Mar 31, 2026 +5
This is false nor was there ever a 50 year deal. Here's a rundown of it   https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-06-27/the-petrodollar-is-dead-long-live-the-petrodollar
5
Himalayanyomom Mar 31, 2026 +2
Thank f*** for that
2
Superduperbals Mar 31, 2026 +7
I am not very smart when it comes to economics but... if I'm understanding correctly... if GCC countries are being forced to reinvest their oil revenues into US assets, like treasury bills and bonds... and selling bills and bonds is how the US finances its huge deficit... ... and if the GCC countries stop investing into US assets, or are otherwise no longer bound by a petrodollar deal as US protection becomes worthless, how does the US finance the interest payments on its debt? Am I missing something here... because this sounds to me like that Bernie Madoff *'oh shit'* moment in a ponzi scheme when '*cash-flow-in'* no longer sustains '*promised-returns-out'* and the walls close in and you do not pass Go, do not collect $200 - and go to jail. I guess... the government can print the money it needs to pay its creditors? But that sounds like a one-way ticket on the hyperinflation express to Zimbabwe.
7
RareBid Mar 31, 2026 +2
I'm no economics expert either, but I've following Michael Hudson, an American Economist who talks about this extensively (he first wrote about it in his book Super Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire in 70s which ironically isn't well published/distributed in US but there are a bunch of interviews with him on YouTube that are  incredibly insightful) but I think you've understood it well.
2
amitkoj Mar 31, 2026 +4
Its ironic that American soldiers have become their mercenaries
4
Curb_the_tide Mar 31, 2026 +4
Qatar would just send Indians and Pakistanis to do it.
4
yesyesitswayexpired Mar 30, 2026 +2
Please do. They've already been attacked.
2
FROOMLOOMS Mar 30, 2026 +3
Could you imagine the blue on blue that would happen if the gulf states tried to work along side the US?
3
xxMOxx78 Mar 31, 2026 +2
I agree. They should be the first to send bodies. This is not a one country problem.
2
PutinBoomedMe Mar 30, 2026 +2
Nah, Israel will keep swiping our credit card
2
XLauncher Mar 30, 2026 +441
Gulf allies privately goad drunk friend into doing a backflip off the roof.
441
IOnlyEatFermions Mar 30, 2026 +53
"How about you and him go fight?"
53
Then_I_had_a_thought Mar 31, 2026 +16
We’re so going to end up nuking someone because Chump and Kegsbreath don’t know how to get us outta the ant hill they stepped in. I hope there’s some safeguard in place but I’ve been hoping for that for 10 years.
16
IAmLegallyRetarded_ Mar 31, 2026 +13
Something does not add up though. Gulf states are the ones that need the Strait open the most. Not only for exporting oil, but also for imports. How exactly does the war benefit them?
13
godisanelectricolive Mar 31, 2026 +25
I guess they see the short pain they already suffered as only worth it if Iran is permanently eliminated. Iran is their major rival and they would love it if the regime collapsed completely.
25
Wurm42 Mar 31, 2026 +32
Saudi is the Gulf state pushing loudly to keep the war going until Iran is completely destroyed. The smaller Gulf states, the ones with all their population and infrastructure close to the Gulf, close to Iran, are distinctly less enthusiastic. From the Gulf states' perspective, the basic argument to keep the war going is that if you stop now, everyone is in a worse position than when the war started. Everybody's had expensive facilities get blown up, everybody but Iran is going to have to pay some combination of tolls and geopolitical concessions to get ships through the Strait of Hormuz. And Iran is crazy mad at everyone now. That all makes the current status quo unstable. The Gulf states are worried that if the war stops now, things will blow up again soon. [Israel has Knesset elections in October](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Israeli_legislative_election). Some players think that peace now is pointless, because Netenyahu will start bombing Iran again in October if it looks like his coalition won't get a strong majority. Or maybe Iran will launch more attacks on the anniversary of the October 7th attacks. If you think peace won't last, maybe it makes sense to keep fighting now instead of giving Iran six months to re-arm. There really aren't a lot of good choices right now.
32
milo_peng Mar 31, 2026 +20
Saudi have the option of the Red Sea, while Kuwait, Qatar, UAE and Bahrain are reliant on the Gulf of Hormuz for their exports. MBS probably sees this correctly as a once in a lifetime opportunity with one idiot in the US and another in Israel to take down Iran.
20
hwaite Mar 31, 2026 +13
The leader of Israel is no idiot. From a purely venal standpoint, Bibi has navigated this shitshow better than anyone.
13
Wurm42 Mar 31, 2026 +3
The Red Sea route helps, but it isn't a panacea for Saudi Arabia. As I write, the East-West Crude oil pipeline can transport 6-7 million barrels a day to the Red Sea, but the oil terminals on the Red Sea end can only load 3-4 million barrels a day onto tankers. Before the war, Saudi Arabia was typically exporting 7.5 million barrels of crude a day. And the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen are in the war now. They're in a good position to attack the pipeline pumping stations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East%E2%80%93West_Crude_Oil_Pipeline?wprov=sfla1
3
milo_peng Mar 31, 2026 +2
You are all correct, and relative to their neighbours that is a lot better than nothing. Which means that they are prepared to see this go on much longer. After all, this is a once in a life time chance for them to take out Iran.
2
KennyMoose32 Mar 31, 2026 +6
Also, and I feel like this isn’t said enough: Iran is full of religious zealots. Now, I mean zealots in the true definition of the term, not derogatory. It is someone who believes so fully in their cause that will do anything to accomplish their goals. They believe they are right and that God is on their side (like so many wayward people) Even if you “beat” them this time, they will come back. Religion is my least favorite human activity but God damn, can it do *monstrous* things. The side that is most committed wins. Always has.
6
turboprancer Mar 31, 2026 +11
They've low-key been pushing for it, and Iran didn't win any sympathy by hitting them either.
11
HelloYesItsMeYourMom Mar 31, 2026 +8
It adds up perfectly well. Unless you’re IRGC, Chinese, Russian, or a Listnookor, everyone wants Irans government destroyed. The entire ME hates them, and if the war ends now then they would all fall under their control eventually.
8
gargarr Mar 31, 2026 +2
Loved the Listnookor part. Ye, people "Forget" that Iran is another level of evil. Both to their people and their "Allies"
2
sambare Mar 31, 2026 +2
Rich kids convince demented neighbour the muslim family across the street are after them.
2
VegasKL Mar 30, 2026 +187
This benefits them because most of the allied nations in the area have realized that the whole "death to Israel" thing can get in the way of profits and prestige. Getting rid of the large hardliner religious country in the area is something they'd be okay with as long as they don't have to do it. It's like a neighborhood that's gentrified the entire block except one house which refuses to sell ... they don't want to look like _the bad guys_ but they'll gladly get all sorts of agencies involved in doing the work for them.
187
Slimmanoman Mar 31, 2026 +10
They are at least as "hardliner religious" a country as Iran (probably more). Let's not white wash them, they're not the proper neighbor in any way, they just happened to be allies of the us/israel at the moment
10
IntelArtiGen Mar 30, 2026 +146
> Officials from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Bahrain have conveyed in private conversations that they do not want the military operation to end until there are significant changes in the Iranian leadership or there’s a dramatic shift in Iranian behavior, Why don't they say it publicly? > The Saudis say an eventual war settlement must neutralize Iran’s nuclear program, destroy its ballistic missile capabilities, end Tehran’s support for proxy groups, and also ensure that the Strait of Hormuz cannot be effectively shutdown by the Islamic Republic in the future as it has during the conflict. Well good luck for that because that strait can be closed by any state with a few drones. The only way to protect it is with negotiations. I guess they could be able to do the rest in a long war but defending the strait is virtually impossible. > “An Iranian regime that launches ballistic missiles at homes, weaponizes global trade and supports proxies is no longer an acceptable feature of the regional landscape,” Noura Al Kaabi, a minister of state at the UAE’s Foreign Ministry, wrote Oh looks like they're able to say it publicly. So what now? They expect the US to do the job?
146
Kranken_DeHogge Mar 30, 2026 +67
>The Saudis say an eventual war settlement must neutralize Iran’s nuclear program, destroy its ballistic missile capabilities, end Tehran’s support for proxy groups, and also ensure that the Strait of Hormuz cannot be effectively shutdown by the Islamic Republic in the future as it has during the conflict. damn that's a big ask for countries that can't do shit to realize it
67
Graymouzer Mar 31, 2026 +8
Iran is huge compared to these countries. How can anyone ensure that without occupying it? Is the US going to be in Iran forever? It is large enough that it would take the entire US military and a draft that went on for generations.
8
InvestigatorOk9354 Mar 31, 2026 +17
All the gulf states can do is bribe Trump to commit US boots to do the dirty work. They have plenty of strategic bribe reserves remaining, so expect Trump to line his pockets while US troops get chewed up in Iranian territory.
17
Purple_oyster Mar 31, 2026 +4
That’s enough
4
wrong-bodied-tengu Mar 30, 2026 +49
its all or nothing for them now, the US and israel totally fucked the status quo. if the US pulls back now theres no telling how Iran will play its cards. clear is that Iran thinks they will say when this war is over and since they are led by religious nuts, that is a pretty serious statement. we can take their word for at least doing their best to do so. the alternative for these countries is to cut ties with the US and join Iran in some sort of 'peace'. It seems doubtful to me that will happen. so yeah, for the safety of these countries, Iran needs to be completely dismantled as any sort of threat. I dont think that can happen, Theyre fucked,
49
LadyBarfnuts Mar 30, 2026 +27
I guess having a plan before attacking a country might have been better. Now its a lose lose situation : spend trillions to dismantle Iran, or pull out and watch them dig in so much deeper than they ever would have prior to this. Iran truly has won this war already.
27
AlHands438 Mar 30, 2026 +13
I wouldn’t really say Iran has won already, it's more like the US has lost already. There's a very real chance the US decides the only way out is forward and ends up committing to a full scale invasion, which likely means the end of the current Iranian government, plus tons of death and destruction for the country. Definitely not a win. But the US really has no positive way out of this. Either get stuck in the biggest and baddest Middle East quagmire yet, or back down and have your bluff called in front of the world
13
LadyBarfnuts Mar 30, 2026 +12
Luckily the man who's leading the charge is capable of admitting to a mistake and definitely wouldn't start a third world war knowing millions will die instead of owning up to it.
12
Kendertas Mar 31, 2026 +3
I still don't see how a full scale invasion would even work without being a logistical clusterfuck from conception. Can't invade from the north because everything's even further inland or to close to Russia. Afghanistan is a no for *gestures broadly, and things would have to seriously change for Pakistan to allow US forces to invade through them so the west is out. A southern Amphibious invasion is impossible without controlling the Strait of Hormuz, and even with that Iran doesn't have a ton of good ports so going to be very difficult to supply a fully mechanized army. That leaves Turkey or Iraq to the west. Turkey is the best option but that just doesn't seem likely. Things would have to drastically change for them to allow that. So that leaves Iraq........I'm sure huge masses of US troops appearing won't cause any issues in the already unstable country. And this is just the problem you have to deal with before you get to the real logistical problem. Invading straight into a huge Iranian mountain range
3
MN_Yogi1988 Mar 31, 2026 +2
> Iran truly has won this war already. I’d say it’s a Vietnam situation, they win by surviving because the American public will get sick of it first.
2
wrong-bodied-tengu Mar 30, 2026 +6
we'll see. starting a war with a plan seems like a good idea to begin with. informing and talking to your allies, particularly in the region would be a great idea. Iran will dig in and future negotiations will be much more difficult and why would they trust the US ever again anyway? Yet, well see how this all will effect Iran. things will be different after this for sure. There is a world before Trump and one after him.
6
LadyBarfnuts Mar 30, 2026 +8
Well, everything he touches turns to dogshit, so I'm not hopeful. Id love to be proven wrong though.
8
wrong-bodied-tengu Mar 30, 2026 +2
not disagreeing with you there. like i said, the deck is shuffled differently now. we gonna have to wait to see what that means
2
IntelArtiGen Mar 30, 2026 +6
> the US and israel totally fucked the status quo This "status quo" has been dead for a long time tbh. In 2019 Iran attacked Saudi Arabia with drones, in 2024 they sent hundreds of missiles and drones on Israel. Now they targeted gulf countries again even if these countries didn't directly participate in the war, only their ground has been used. And it was possible for Iran to only retaliate on US bases without targeting energy infrastructure (inevitably paving the way for a symmetrical response). > the alternative for these countries is to cut ties with the US and join Iran in some sort of 'peace'. It seems doubtful to me that will happen. yeah would you? If I bomb your country because another country is bombing me, you'd say "ok I can be friend with you" ? These things never happen, you bomb a country: they're your enemy. They can't "apologize" their way out of this (Pezeshchian did it and it's ridiculous). > Iran needs to be completely dismantled as any sort of threat. I dont think that can happen Yeah I also don't think it can happen. But Trump can indeed destroy all their oil infrastructure and power plants. Idk how it'll solve the problems but it doesn't really look like people are just trying to solve problems here.
6
WeakLocalization Mar 31, 2026 +2
Irans economic situation is also pretty fucked tbf. Even if the war ends tomorrow, it's still a very dark future for iran
2
MustachioedMystery Mar 30, 2026 +3
It is disgustingly ironic that the last quote perfectly describes American actions as well.
3
Jellicent-Leftovers Mar 30, 2026 +7
That's what happens when you spend all that oil money on fancy shit instead of a military. The US told them they would be their military in exchange the oil must flow. So they are saying hey do your job. Alternatively the Saudis start their own military and nuclear programs..... See how that's an issue?
7
Single-Purpose-7608 Mar 30, 2026 +9
If Iran can hold the strait hostage, then any country can do the same.  If the US decides to be an ass, they could close it too. China can do the same. So can Russia.   Its a switch that can only be turned on and off. And turning it "on" only means hurting the global economy. The only way out of this is to not depend on the gulf for petro products, and not to depend on petroproducts in general
9
cool_lemons Mar 31, 2026 +3
I just visited an elderly friend who is battling pneumonia. Literally everything involved in her care is plastic. IVs, oxygen mask, tubes, diapers, etc. I try to avoid plastics in general, but I don't think it's possible to cut plastics from our lives. If this doesn't resolve, I don't know what hospitals are going to do.
3
TwentyCharactersShor Mar 30, 2026 +24
Aka "you started this shit, you better finish it"
24
Cyclone050 Mar 31, 2026 +9
The true cost of receiving a ‘free’ luxury jet becomes apparent.
9
Timothy7819 Mar 30, 2026 +15
They should send their armies into Iran then.
15
Ble_h Mar 30, 2026 +52
So far our gulf allies have done nothing except cover their own asses and they can’t even do that right given how much is getting blown up.
52
Horat1us_UA Mar 30, 2026 +50
They gave some money to the president you elected. That’s enough in modern states
50
RickyRetardo__ Mar 31, 2026 +4
Hey now, the Ghost of Kuwait managed to down three (American) fighter jets!
4
jphamlore Mar 30, 2026 +17
And what exactly is anyone's idea to re-open the Strait of Hormuz?
17
joelfarris Mar 30, 2026 +7
It's in progress. It has to be. Trust the machine. Do you like strawberry or chocolate flavor better?
7
Imbendo Mar 31, 2026 +6
Smooth and reliable just like a McDonald’s ice cream machine. Wait.
6
watch-nerd Mar 30, 2026 +9
My plan: Submarine tankers
9
Shadowlance23 Mar 31, 2026 +7
Rail guns. Tankers have steel hulls right? Park those bad bois between a pair of rails, angle up a bit, and send a few hundred gigajoules down the line. Yeet those mfers right over the strait.
7
spike_beagle Mar 31, 2026 +3
NOW we're talkin!
3
HelloYesItsMeYourMom Mar 31, 2026 +2
The longer term goal of destroying the regime is more important to the US and Israel than opening the Strait in the short term
2
Jamesbondola Mar 31, 2026 +5
The king of deals strikes again. For the low price of a $400million jet and investing in his crypto scam, Americans get to foot the bill for a $2billion a day war.
5
Turbulent-Throat9962 Mar 30, 2026 +54
How long are we going to be lap dogs to these fuckers?
54
D4ng3rd4n Mar 30, 2026 +63
I guess until the American people decide to not elect leaders that get them into these situations.
63
InvestigatorOk9354 Mar 31, 2026 +7
AIPAC says the democrats are too antisemitic now, so the only option is for Netanyahu to send our kids off to die in Iran I guess.
7
Irikee Mar 30, 2026 +13
As long as we are energy dependent and people in power keep it that way.
13
VanCityPhotoNewbie Mar 31, 2026 +1
The crazy part is they didn't have to be.....Canada could literally supply all of the US's needs and even elecrtrical needs. It has more to do with regional control and bribery of politicians and their family.
1
GK0NATO Mar 31, 2026 +2
That would still be energy dependant. Either way, the US is energy independent and is a net exporter of oil.
2
External-Praline-451 Mar 31, 2026 +4
The rest of the world is thinking that about America, although, more how long are we going to let them f*** up everything for everyone else....
4
aedes Mar 30, 2026 +4
The situation has analogies to how English kings financed the crusades. They became dependent on them to raise capital via debt to fund the crusades, as domestic taxation was inadequate.  Which meant Florence effectively controlled English foreign policy.  And then the somewhat ominous conclusion where Edward the III started an invasion of France with foreign capital on the thought it would be a quick and easy war… which started the 100 years war, and England being unable to repay the debts and financial crisis in Europe. 
4
capnfoo Mar 30, 2026 +4
Until midterms and then we Nuremberg those fucks.
4
heekma Mar 30, 2026 +16
Interesting article from a trusted source such as AP News. Iran is the largest and most populated gulf state and has been destabizing to the region for 50 years and while other states haven't embraced democratic rule they have accepted some forms of capitalism, tourism, international trade and investment, looking to the future. Look at Dubai as an example. The unsaid headline isn't they support the toppling of Iran, they support it if the U.S. spends billions and years doing it for them instead.
16
divinbuff Mar 31, 2026 +3
They want the US to defeat Iran so they can move in and claim the oil.
3
Victor_L Mar 31, 2026 +5
It's insanity. A no-win scenario. Iran is the point on which this whole thing is balanced. They're the ones that decide the war is over, either by getting the concessions they're after, or by collapsing. The US doesn't really get a vote at this point. Even if they stop and back off, Iran certainly isn't going to. The Saudis are hurting under present conditions, to put it mildly, but they also can't afford an escalation. If the US starts gathering up the hundreds of thousands of soldiers needed for an invasion, they'll be staging them in Gulf countries, and Iran will absolutely hit the escalation button and throw everything they've got at desalination and other vital water infrastructure. Same if they cut off Iran's oil exports.  If the US bails, Iran still dominates the strait. If they give in, Iran wins, and gets the concessions they're after, and the Gulf states really do not want an ascendant Iran across from them. The only real bet for the Saudis is to grin and bear the pain, and hope the present pace of bombings and assassinations is enough to break the regime. Authoritarian regimes may always look pretty solid, but that's right up until they collapse. I've yet to see any evidence that it'll take anything less than a massive ground effort to topple the IRGC, but hey, we don't get the full picture (clearly world leaders don't either, unfortunately). So yeah, this whole situation is screwed. The only thing the Gulf states can really do is encourage the US to keep up the present pressure, because there are no other palatable options.
5
SpaceYetu531 Mar 31, 2026 +2
Iran will eventually run out of munitions and run out of time not governing their country.
2
Jgusdaddy Mar 30, 2026 +6
Whomever gives the Trump family the most cash will decide.
6
shazspaz Mar 30, 2026 +3
If it’s so private why the column? Maybe, not so private.
3
I_Have_A_Nightmare Mar 31, 2026 +3
They could all invade together and actually do a regime change. They won't because they all hate each other but they could. Israel won't even be the tail of the spear. History books aren't even remotely gonna be able to sane wash this shit.
3
ShadowCaster0476 Mar 31, 2026 +3
Not surprising that all of the countries that have sent him and his family billions wants to protect their assets by having him fight thier wars.
3
StDiabolique Mar 31, 2026 +3
Gulf "allies": "Let's you and him fight!"
3
Kathdath Mar 31, 2026 +3
It has long been publically known that the IRCG policy in the even of an attack is to ensure that neibouring nations suffered a similar pain to whatever was inflicted on Iran (their version of MAD). This policy orginiates, not in fear of the USA or Israel, but due to realistic concerns as a majority Shi'a nation of an attack by a, then superiorly armed, Sunni nation (namely Saudi Arabia or their proxies).
3
LovelyDayHere Mar 31, 2026 +3
"Privately", but sure, they informed AP News.
3
phred_666 Mar 30, 2026 +21
Translation: we want you to do the dirty work for us
21
wrong-bodied-tengu Mar 30, 2026 +13
the US and israel started this shit, now they need to finish it. its not that hard to understand
13
srone Mar 30, 2026 +10
They bought the President of the United States, they get to tell him what to do. If we want the president to work for the US we have to buy him a luxury 747, buy $3B Trump coins, and rent out his hotels without using them, give his son-in-law a few billion for his private equity fund, and give him a golf series.
10
whitemamba24xx Mar 30, 2026 +6
No different then the corporate donors that have done it for decades. They don’t represent the majority
6
srone Mar 30, 2026 +6
It is different. While I find the corporate donors vile, it goes to campaign funds and is legal. This money is going directly to Trump's bank account, which is a violation of the emoluments clause of the US Constitution.
6
ElTejon_TheDestroyer Mar 30, 2026 +5
I think they missed the word ‘bribe’ out there. Troops will die in an unpopular war for this man baby’s greed.
5
tree_squid Mar 30, 2026 +4
None of them are allies, every one of those countries is hostile to the USA and is just using us
4
Fair-Hair2080 Mar 30, 2026 +9
Send Baron, have him lead the gulf allies’ sons and daughters with boots on the ground, into the war.
9
Call-to-john Mar 30, 2026 +5
I feel very sorry for those poor American boys that will have to give their life for this war of choice. For absolutely nothing. No one deserves to have their life tossed away on a whim.
5
thatpj Mar 30, 2026 +13
listnook refuses to comprehend how awful iran has been to the entire region. saudi arabia was lobbying for the war in the first place. but none of that fits the narrative.
13
Sacaron_R3 Mar 31, 2026 +15
Saudi Arabia has exported their wahhabism for a couple of decades as well, along with the other gulf monarchies. Let's not forget that they also financed terrorist groups like Al-Queda.
15
FaveDave85 Mar 31, 2026 +12
Then they should fight the war not us
12
Dougalishere Mar 30, 2026 +2
Privately make their case = give over money I guess
2
Cdcgirl2 Mar 30, 2026 +2
“Rich man’s war. Poor man’s fight.” 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
2
Intelligent-Dig4362 Mar 30, 2026 +2
Wait, I thought Iran was already defeated, for like the third time? Do we need to defeat them even further?
2
CliffBiffington Mar 30, 2026 +2
But I thought the US already won, they’re just sticking around for shits n gigs now?
2
TheHumanGnomeProject Mar 31, 2026 +2
"More protracted foreign wars!" -Trump | Vance 2024
2
McRibs2024 Mar 31, 2026 +2
They sure made their bribes public though even if the requests are private.
2
Minimum_Run_890 Mar 31, 2026 +2
Use the US to take the hit, if it doesn’t work they don’t loos3va lot of troops and equipment.
2
thejovo59 Mar 31, 2026 +2
Privately?
2
Chaz_wazzers Mar 31, 2026 +2
I guess they aren't worried about drinking water. Good luck with that.
2
wjames0394 Mar 31, 2026 +2
The grifting continues for the regime of America.
2
[deleted] Mar 31, 2026 +2
[deleted]
2
Ok_Analyst_5640 Mar 31, 2026 +2
Israel and the US started this war, the Gulf states didn't want any part of it but let the Americans use their bases there. Iran has been pretty clear that the gulf states are collateral damage for hosting American bases. Now America must either win this war or admit defeat and leave all the bases in the gulf because Iran won't tolerate them as it did before.
2
obxhead Mar 31, 2026 +2
The case is simple. We fail into economic collapse.
2
Tango_D Mar 31, 2026 +2
They really are getting him to make the US do their dirty work at the expense of the American taxpayer.
2
Catch_022 Mar 31, 2026 +2
It's a pretty simple equation - either the US can protect Gulf states or it can't. If the US can't protect Gulf state, then the US can't have bases in Gulf states - and the Gulf states make an agreement with Iran for their safety. Any agreement of that type is going to include sanctions against the US government and Gulf states suddenly stop being friendly to US interests, and stop buying US hardware. US influence dissapears in the Middle East.
2
Rymbegla Mar 31, 2026 +2
They just put a couple of $billions in Kushners account to make it happen. He is the puppet master.
2
redheadedandbold Mar 31, 2026 +3
So, the gulf states are using Trump to further their religious war. Trump doesn't have enough braincells left to know when he's being used. Trump the Chump.
3
Boys4Ever Mar 31, 2026 +2
Then perhaps they can replace us in their fight.
2
Mountain_rage Mar 30, 2026 +5
How big is his secret Qatari bank account?
5
coreychch Mar 30, 2026 +3
That’s bold call … if they ramp this up and Iran retaliates, you can expect most of the Middle East to be cut off from water, causing a massive humanitarian crisis.
3
doolpicate Mar 31, 2026 +3
The monarchies will fall and emigrate to the USA. Trump will have wealthy ex-monarchs living next to him in Florida in exile if they escape alive.
3
Maximum_Error3083 Mar 31, 2026 +3
As much as this war sucks right now there is one point worth considering. Iran has the ability to choke the entire global economy through the strait of Hormuz. They also are a psychopathic country that is enamoured to fund and promote terrorism around the world. *if* they were ever to develop a nuclear power, they’d be able to do what they’re doing now with the threat of launching a nuke if anyone were to try and stop them. That would be a horrible world to live in and it underscores why it really is true that they cannot be allowed to develop or attain nuclear weapons and ICBMs. I’m not saying it means the war right now at this time and in this manner is justified, just that it can’t be forgotten. The world would be better off if Iran had no control over any major trade route and also did not have even the remote possibility of obtaining a nuke.
3
CircumspectCapybara Mar 30, 2026 +4
No duh, they want their missile and drone spamming madman of a neighbor neutralized after what they've done. The gulf states many of whom used to be neutral or even friendly to Iran will now never again feel safe with an unpacified Iran. The Iranian regime ruined all soft power they had in the region for the next hundred years by attacking their neighbors, all of whom had nothing even to do with the US attacks, they didn't even allow them use of airfields or overflight over their territory (initial airstrikes came all from carrier based aircraft) *until* Iran started attacking them and pushed them into league with the US and Israel, and compressed a hundred years' worth of Israeli-Arab relations normalization into a month.
4
copperblood Mar 30, 2026 +3
Breaking News: Sunni and Shia have been slaughtering each other since 632 CE and would like to continue doing that by any means necessary.
3
Matchett32 Mar 30, 2026 +2
Uncle Sap always there when you need us
2
Whend6796 Mar 30, 2026 +2
Of course they want that. That is obvious. Are they going to pay for it though?
2
KneeDragr Mar 31, 2026 +2
We're going to have boots on the ground over there for 20 years again aren't we?
2
Imbendo Mar 31, 2026 +3
I think trump backs down and goes home.
3
seethenoise Mar 31, 2026 +2
they are all using him to do their dirty work, while he thinks he's their hero.
2
elementality883 Mar 31, 2026 +2
"Please keep using your money, bodies, and equipment so we can become more dominant in the region."
2
Ok_Analyst_5640 Mar 31, 2026 +2
Well yeah, they haven't even done half a job yet. They're retreating and calling it a win.
2
Constant-Tea3148 Mar 31, 2026 +1
It makes sense for them to want this now. They've already suffered most of the damages, and this war has somehow managed to embolden the Iranians in their control over Hormuz by proving it is easy to close and incredibly difficult to keep open. Now that the status quo has been so thoroughly fucked it doesn't surprise me they want to see it through to the end now. Whether that'll happen is another question, seems to me it almost certainly will require American boots on the ground.
1
hacketyapps Mar 31, 2026 +2
remember it's not a war, it's only a military operation!
2
LaBasBleu Mar 30, 2026 +1
He'll keep at it as long as they keep giving him gold trinkets.
1
enigma002 Mar 30, 2026 +1
What does “decisively defeated” mean in a “special operation” without clear and defined objectives/goals?
1
Dubhs Mar 30, 2026 +1
Seriously? Iran is threatening their desal plants? 
1
Beyond_Your_Nose Mar 30, 2026 +1
He’s acting like such a chump.
1
Doppler74 Mar 30, 2026 +1
If Iran aims water plants in many of these countries, it is game over for them. Why do firmly believe that is not the case? Do they think Iran wont do it or it wont be able to? I ask genuinely.
1
BrofessorFarnsworth Mar 30, 2026 +1
I bet. And then everyone clapped?
1
Raspberries-Are-Evil Mar 30, 2026 +1
Define “defeated.”
1
HypocriteGrammarNazi Mar 30, 2026 +1
Iran could just be bombed to bits, the challenge is that they will bomb the gulf region to bits in retaliation. So I'm not sure what they're wanting here.
1
rideadove Mar 30, 2026 +1
Of course, do their dirty work because Trump is a sucker and a loser.
1
antisocialdecay Mar 30, 2026 +1
Least she had her necklace on. praise be.
1
No-Membership-5314 Mar 31, 2026 +1
I’m glad nothing bad-long term has ever come from US backed regime changes.
1
Idsuab Mar 31, 2026 +1
Make the case as in bribe? 
1
_Mamushi_ Mar 31, 2026 +1
Ah so more American blood will be spilled for foreign powers.
1
DiarrheaMonkey1 Mar 31, 2026 +1
Wow! So private!
1
Fuckstanmartian Mar 31, 2026 +1
the same people that payed him a bunch of money a little bit ago?? hmm quid pro quo?
1
adhq Mar 31, 2026 +1
Their "case" isn't that hard to make, is it? A multi-hundred-million jet gift and a few underage girls sealed the deal...
1
leisurechef Mar 31, 2026 +1
They obviously don’t like drinking water
1
watch_out_4_snakes Mar 31, 2026 +1
Wow, they are as profoundly dumb as we are. This is going to be one for the ages and I’m sure regular folks will take the most damage.
1
teritomai Mar 31, 2026 +1
If this is true it’s kind of funny that they think they will be safe from American greed
1
boogi3woogie Mar 31, 2026 +1
They don’t want TACOs
1
AleXstheDark Mar 31, 2026 +1
Just keep fighting for more 50 years bro
1
← Back to Board