· 72 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 21, 2026 at 2:04 PM

‘Half Man’ Review: Richard Gadd Follows ‘Baby Reindeer’ with a Dire, One-Note Slog

Posted by mrnicegy26


‘Half Man’ Review: Richard Gadd Follows ‘Baby Reindeer’ with a Dire, One-Note Slog
IndieWire
‘Half Man’ Review: Richard Gadd Follows ‘Baby Reindeer’ with a Dire, One-Note Slog
A quiet boy befriends his violent step-brother with disastrous consequences in 'Half Man,' an HBO series from the creator of 'Baby Reindeer.' [Review]

🚩 Report this post

72 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Cheap_Wishbone_9734 4 days ago +224
I think the show is going to divide opinions. I've seen reviews calling it brilliant and others saying it's repetitive.
224
amidon1130 4 days ago +119
The other posted review called it both brilliant and repetitive lol
119
BigMetalGuy 4 days ago +52
brilliantly repetitive
52
naileyes 4 days ago +37
Cardassian literature in the house
37
RocketBoost 4 days ago +6
Welcome back, The Never-Ending Sacrifice
6
mattyboy555 4 days ago +4
Repetitively brilliant
4
ExtensionParsley4205 4 days ago +3
My job. My job. Being repetitive is my job.
3
Jasonguyen81 3 days ago +1
Repetitively brilliant
1
MNManmacker 4 days ago
Also, effulgently repetitious
0
trivia_guy 4 days ago +5
The Guardian review made it sound terrifying, lol.
5
ASATClassico 4 days ago +26
Others have called it a dire, one-note slog
26
Cheap_Wishbone_9734 4 days ago +3
Yes. And others said it's Outstanding. Like I said, a show that's going to divide people. 
3
ASATClassico 4 days ago +9
Headline, chief
9
[deleted] 4 days ago -3
[deleted]
-3
lesbie 4 days ago +6
they're making a joke, man
6
HereComesTheWolfman 4 days ago +85
Scroll 6 posts another review raves about it. Art sure is subjective
85
thrilling_me_softly 4 days ago +7
Was just thinking this myself.
7
vocal-avocado 4 days ago +5
Not always. Some stuff gets pretty much universal acclaim.
5
ILikeLizards24 4 days ago +23
That doesn’t make it any less subjective.
23
IrrelevantLeprechaun 4 days ago +7
Yeah it's kind of reductive for people to say "if it's controversial then it means it's actually good!" Like no, there absolutely are media that are pretty universally recognized as being very good, and other media widely recognized as being bad. If people can't agree on whether it's good or bad, in many cases it just means it's in between; *it's neither good nor bad, merely ok.*
7
WhoeverWinsWeLose 4 days ago +1
All it takes is one disagreement to make it subjective. Enjoyment is a science
1
alexjimithing 4 days ago +103
Baby Reindeer was a dire one note slog so it fits.
103
BigfootsBestBud 4 days ago +28
Baby Reindeer was a car crash for me, I hated every second of it but I couldn’t look away. 
28
space_island 3 days ago +7
It made me so intensely uncomfortable and I came away from it feeling gross. My GF and I still binged the c*** out of it.
7
thedukeofwankington 4 days ago +32
It was the TV equivalent of sitting on a wet park bench It seemed ok at first, but gradually got uncomfortable and unpleasant
32
BradyPhoenix 4 days ago +78
Well yes, I believe that was the intention and why it got such acclaim.
78
alexjimithing 4 days ago +21
My problem with it is, for me, that's all there is. It's the 'trauma', and I get it. I'm sure it was cathartic for Gadd to work through that with his art, and that's awesome. It resonated with audiences, clearly, and helped people work through their personal trauma(s) similar in one way or another, which is fantastic and makes the creation an objectively good thing. I don't want to describe it as 'misery p***' or 'trauma p***', akin to something like This Is Us, because I think that marginalizes what Gadd went through and how he processed/is processing it and how it shows through his work, but that's how it comes across to me. I think part of the problem (again, for me personally, not trying to make any objective claims) is television is simply a worse medium for that compared to film, especially a show focused on one person as opposed to an ensemble cast. Movies like Mother!, or Ordinary People, or Good Will Hunting I find much more effective when it comes to 'trauma' if only because the shorter runtime prevents the like, "Yeah, I f****** get it.", reaction I inevitably have when we're drawing out the story over 7-8-9+ episodes. Just as a final note, all the above is, again, my personal opinion, and not a judgement of Gadd/the people who enjoyed the show.
21
Sherringdom 4 days ago +14
I disagree but I think you’ve been very eloquent with your reasoning and completely understand it. I’d say theatre is the other medium that would suit this sort of writing, which I think is what baby reindeer started out as?
14
ChaoticSenior 4 days ago +7
Upvoted for calling This is Us trauma p***.
7
Sapowski_Casts_Quen 4 days ago +12
I understood what baby reindeer was trying to say and I think it did a good job saying it. But holy moly was that a hate watch, I feel like I gained nothing from it. I think I LOST something.
12
Tittysprinkle97 4 days ago +19
I liked the show and understood what it was going for, but it’s a show I don’t think I could ever watch again and it was genuinely a tough watch at various different points. You don’t think it can get any worse, then it gets 3x as bad. I’ve watched a lot of tv and a lot of fucked up shows, but that one had me squirming in my seat unlike pretty much anything else I’d watch. Pure secondhand embarrassment
19
Sapowski_Casts_Quen 3 days ago +1
Literally think you could do oke of those honest trailer videos for it and the joke title at the end would be "Oversharing"
1
OneSeaworthiness7768 4 days ago -1
Yeah, felt crazy that everyone was always raving about it. Was just *okay* at best for me. Seemed pretty overrated.
-1
lu5ty 4 days ago -15
I couldnt understand all the praise it got. If the premise wasn't so provocative no one wouldve givien a f*** about it
-15
WillingnessSmooth673 4 days ago +10
Surely that could be said about any show, oh well if the premise of Braking Bad was different, well then it would be a different show? If the premise of Baby Reindeer was different well then…it would be a different show?
10
funkhero 4 days ago
Braking bad just ends in a wreck.
0
lu5ty 4 days ago -4
yea but its a mediocre show that only got hyped bc the premise is outlandish.
-4
Stalk33r 4 days ago +2
For me I couldn't get past the fact that it's meant to be directly biographical. The pure act of taking your real life trauma, commodifying it and adapting it as a Netflix show starring yourself feels extremely masturbatory and starkly dystopian on so many levels.
2
Sherringdom 4 days ago +5
That’s a lot of art though right? People use different mediums to process their own thoughts, could be painting, theatre or scriptwriting
5
Stalk33r 4 days ago
Personally I feel like there's a difference between making art to process your experiences and making a show for a megacorp about a dramatized version of your life starring yourself. I don't know if I have a specific cogent argument as to why it feels so... icky, but I could not push past it.
0
natalie_mf_portman 4 days ago +9
god DAMN he's jacked
9
[deleted] 4 days ago -11
[removed]
-11
natalie_mf_portman 4 days ago +6
Living up to your username
6
berlinbaer 4 days ago +8
oh no. was so looking forward to it. though the other review posted calls it 'brilliant' so who knows
8
UnluckyObserver15 4 days ago +24
Majority of reviews I’ve seen are on the positive side. I think it’ll probably be decent, but not on the same level as Baby Reindeer.
24
[deleted] 4 days ago +1
62 percent rating. So yeah 
1
EyeAmKnotMyshelf 4 days ago +3
So, is it an outstandingly dire one note slog? Or a dire, one note slog that is somehow outstanding?
3
Vitiligogoinggone 4 days ago +1
But how does Indiewire REALLY feel about it? 😂
1
notyour_motherscamry 1 day ago +1
Hey all - after the premiere last night I made a dedicated sublistnook for the show! Feel free to come discuss episodes & all aspects of the show with us. [https://www.listnook.com/r/HalfManTV/](https://www.listnook.com/r/HalfManTV/)
1
aestheticathletic 1 day ago +1
I think the show is so good, it could have actually been a book.
1
TheWholeOfTheAss 4 days ago -1
Stop trusting reviews. Make up your own mind. The show is just two clicks away.
-1
ras344 4 days ago +17
I don't have enough time to watch every show that comes out. Reviews help me figure out which shows are worth watching.
17
__CIREK 9 hr ago +1
You will miss out on plenty, and that which you do watch will already be tainted. Look up the “Horn effect”
1
TheWholeOfTheAss 4 days ago -7
Or just watch the ones that catch your interest? You liked jacked English men? Check out Half Man.
-7
rcanhestro 4 days ago +7
the show is two clicks away, and so are thousands of other shows. reviews are still the best way to filter through them.
7
Brock_Danger 4 days ago +3
Or you could just not take reviews as gospel, read between the lines, read more than one, and make your own call
3
alexx_kidd 3 days ago +1
Ben Travers. What a joke of a critic
1
Beardybeardface2 1 day ago +1
I'm pretty sure I'll be in the minority with this but I found it so OTT that I couldn't buy into these characters who are all caricature horrible to the man and as a result nothing felt real. I ended up finding scenes that should have been utterly harrowing untentionally funny, like these aren't people going through truly horrible things, but just set pieces designed to push buttons. As if Gadd is looking through the screen going "are you disturbed yet are you?" It doesn't feel raw and honest, just kind of edgelord-ish and emotionally inert. The acting is great, and I think the theme of closeted masculine rage is worth exploring, but I think this actually might be trash. I was definitely entertained though, this certainly is not boring, but not quite the way Gadd intended - maybe the best way of approaching this is as a kind of fucked up camp. Baby Reindeer often teetered on the edge of having the same problem, but it didn't quite go over and had a big helping hand of (intentional) humour and great characters, this is much thinner on the ground in both regards.
1
Significant-Luck-831 4 days ago -7
How Richard Gadd is getting away with all of this is insane. Baby Reindeer is still meant to go to court and being slowed down by everything Netflix has in the tank. Anyone who knows Richard knows that he lied about what happened in that show (not the r***) but the stalking of any kind. This is not new information. Disgusted to see this.
-7
UnluckyObserver15 3 days ago +10
Netflix seems to be more at fault for using the “This is a true story” tag when Gadd had reservations on using that specific wording, hence why the original stage play was billed as “based on a true story”. The show and stage play were obviously made to entertain mainstream audiences rather than it being a factual recounting of the real life events. Also, while the stalking claims were likely exaggerated, it’s incorrect to say that that no “stalking of any kind” ever happened. Evidence has already been presented in court where it was shown that Gadd had sought police intervention over the incidents, and others have also come forward to claim they were harassed/stalked by the same woman. She sent 276 emails to the current UK Prime Minister ffs.
10
vanillabear84 3 days ago +11
Anyone that saw her on piers morgan knows that she's a straight loony lmao
11
Significant-Luck-831 3 days ago -1
She absolutely is. No one is saying she isn't short of a screw or that she didn't stalk politicians. It's just anyone that knows Gadd knows that she never stalked him and he just took inspiration. Look at the Hawley Pub workers speaking publicly about it. It's not exactly a hidden truth.
-1
Significant-Luck-831 3 days ago
Oh trust me, he is equally as guilty. He claimed his theatre show Baby Reindeer was also a true story long before Netflix were in the picture. Fiona stalks politicians. She never stalked Gadd and people from the pub have came forward to say so publicly. You can fan about him all you like but I actually know him and others who know him also know it to be awful. He is disgustingly ambitious and didn't expect the lashback or for Fiona to come out of the wood work. She obviously has a lot of issues but Gadd used to joke about her knowing she had this past. She never stalked him, he just saw an opportunity for another gender-flipped victim story. The truth isn't to everyones liking but mark my words, he is not a good person and lost a lot of friends over it. My guess is that Netflix will find a scapegoat producer to fire for the True Story aspect but I have absolutely no doubt that Gadd is to blame.
0
KeremyJyles 3 days ago +4
Ok Fiona, here's your bus coming
4
Significant-Luck-831 3 days ago +2
You don't have to like the truth. Last I checked, her spelling wasn't too wonderful. Once you take the fanboy goggles off, you might actually see that he did something awful to a clearly vulnerable woman.
2
KeremyJyles 3 days ago +1
I think he's a d*** and his show was garbage. That doesn't mean you don't sound mental and obsessed.
1
Significant-Luck-831 3 days ago +2
I'll admit, I am bothered by it. Doesn't make me mental or obsessed but he was, at one point, a pretty good friend. I don't think some of us realised the extent of what he was capable of, especially his poor girlfriend (a great musician btw). It's hard to explain but it was upsetting and jading to watch him just fully lie about being stalked, watch a vulnerable woman be thrown to mass media slaughter for SO LONG. He's a coward and he let it happen while taking praise for being "brave" by stalking survivors. Maybe I am more bothered than I should be but he should have been properly held to account by now and how he got to create another show is just insult to injury.
2
KeremyJyles 3 days ago +5
You're either her or someone trying very hard to make people think you're her. She has popped up on listnook before with similar thoughts and behaviour.
5
Significant-Luck-831 3 days ago +2
Fiona Harvey cannot spell to save herself. I am also not trying to be her. I am what I said I am. If you're not convinced then its best to leave it.
2
KeremyJyles 3 days ago +3
That's a really weak defence tbh, most of her errors were obvious typos by a mental case rushing
3
Swimming_Onion_4835 1 day ago
I have no skin in this game, I know no real facts of the case, and I liked the show, but the second I saw Gadd out of character I thought he came off like an a******. There’s something about him that felt off. Doesn’t impact any sort of opinion I have on the whole debacle, because like I said, I don’t know any of the facts—so I have no opinion. But I don’t think you’re coming off as unhinged or something like you were just accused of. From my place far removed from this, I can see that her obvious mental health issues and history of stalking behavior absolutely lends credence to the story. Then again, it’s not like it would be the first time someone took advantage of a mentally ill person in the hopes that no one would believe them when they come forward and insist something isn’t true. So imo your argument is as valid as the other.
0
fletters 3 days ago +2
Based on viewing the series alone? There was something really hinky about the whole narrative. I had the distinct feeling that I was somehow being scammed. I can’t put my finger on it, and I really don’t want to rewatch for more careful analysis. I’ll just be extremely unsurprised if/when he gets discredited in some way.
2
← Back to Board