Yeah… somehow I don’t think the ceasefire is going to hold.
4743
Cl1mh4224rd1 day ago
+1480
>Yeah… somehow I don’t think the ceasefire is going to hold.
It's already dead. And given comments from Iran, Israel, and the US, I'm not sure it ever actually existed. It sounds like everyone agreed to a different set of terms.
1480
zekromNLR1 day ago
+403
There was a concept of a ceasefire
403
LadyPo1 day ago
+118
Enough to manipulate prices and stocks.
Create a possible problem (in this case a literal doomsday scenario), invent a convenient solution, open the markets. It’s all untethered to reality.
118
Handsome_Keyboard1 day ago
+14
Its called: "A military operation ceasefire".
14
EruditusMaximus1 day ago
+281
It didn’t even have a chance. Within an hour, Israel was bombing Lebanon again.
281
snoosh001 day ago
+82
I'm just a silly little birthday boy, you wouldn't hit me, it's ok for me to lob missiles at civilians in Lebanon... I mean *I* didn't agree to the ceasefire AND it's my *birthday*.
82
Minimum-Dare3011 day ago
+14
Happy birthday 🎁
14
PterionFracture1 day ago
+14
Oooh, did you get me a watch? I can hear it ticking!
14
Rylth1 day ago
+8
Hmmm... What is that mysterious ticking noise?
8
alexanderfsu1 day ago
+5
Sorry that's my pager
5
catsbetterthankids1 day ago
+17
I have a feeling Bibi doesn’t want the bloodshed to stop
17
DE4DM4NSH4ND1 day ago
+2
BB absolutely does not want this war to end untile israel controls most of jordan and syria. They need their lebenraum
2
Particular_Bug01 day ago
+24
The biggest and deadliest bombarded of this war on Libanon. They knew exactly what they were doing
24
Elrox1 day ago
+23
Nobody is sticking to the terms of the legally binding tweet?
23
Misersoneof1 day ago
+10
The only way this is gonna stop is if America cuts off aid to Israel. If Netanyahu's freedom depends on perpetual war then he will never go along with any terms, no matter how good they are.
10
RostyC1 day ago
+9
I think Israel torpedoed the cease fire, because, no war, trial begins!!
9
kralrick1 day ago
+9
You should blame Netanyahu specifically if you think that's the reasoning.
9
DE4DM4NSH4ND1 day ago
+10
Israel flattened a city block with bombings and killed hundreds indiscriminately. They need to stop the warhawking across the middle east if anyone is going to take them seriously again.
10
Volodio1 day ago
+7
Factually the ceasefire seems to be mostly in effect. The strikes against Iran has stopped, same for the Iranian strikes against Israel. The strikes against the Gulf countries are still ongoing but reduced. Likely it is the civilian government struggling to establish its authority and convince the independent commanders to stop. Might have been why Iran claimed Lebanon was included in the ceasefire, maybe it was not and it is just an excuse to blame the ceasefire violations on the other side when the government knew that the IRGC would not immediately abide by it.
7
MegaBaumTV1 day ago
+28
> Might have been why Iran claimed Lebanon was included in the ceasefire, maybe it was not
Pakistan, the mediator, says Lebanon was included.
28
licensed2jill1 day ago
+11
So did the US... initially
11
Volodio1 day ago
+3
The same day, the president of Pakistan said that Israel was a threat and Pakistan was ready to take over the opposition to Israel (implied from Iran). Pakistan is not neutral when it comes to Israel.
3
MegaBaumTV1 day ago
+24
If Irans 10 point plan that included the end of all attacks against Lebanon was used as a base for negotiations - as the US itself admitted - and both the mediator and Iran say that this was in fact included in the ceasefire agreement, then im inclined to believe them.
The alternative is that everyone except the Trump administration is lying, and that doesnt seem to be on brand.
Also, the mediator moving away from a neutral position after one side broke the agreement isnt that farfetched or makes the mediators former role less trustworthy
24
mvearthmjsun1 day ago
+7
Strait is still closed though. The ceasefire is not being honored.
7
moop441 day ago
+8
It is open, you just need to pay a toll in Yuan or cryptos.
8
mvearthmjsun1 day ago
+8
It's closed. That is for when it opens eventually.
8
moop441 day ago
+5
It was briefly open until two other members of the agreement immediately violated it.
It will probably take some time to figure out of those parties are capable of lasting more than a couple hours.
5
dbratell1 day ago
+1
Same as some of Trump's trade deals.
1
SirTiffAlot1 day ago
+41
I give it until Saturday evening until bombing starts up again
41
ElectricChocoDad1 day ago
+41
Nah Friday at 16:31 EST
41
MR11201 day ago
+17
Yep. Right after trading ends for the weekend.
17
Blueberryburntpie1 day ago
+2
Save the weekends for the ground invasion of Iran.
2
[deleted]1 day ago
+2
[deleted]
2
VoidOmatic1 day ago
+83
He'd bomb every kindergarten in his own country before he would willingly go to jail.
83
JarOfNightmares1 day ago
+37
Who, Trump or Netanyahu? Lol
37
VoidOmatic1 day ago
+47
Both for sure.
47
Eikfo1 day ago
+3
Nah, trump would not. He needs the kindergarten for relaxation purposes.
3
Flatus_Diabolic1 day ago
+18
The first corruption trial to be measured in bodies per minute.
18
Notorious_Junk1 day ago
+5
It's insane that so much devastation and death is allowed in society to protect these leaders like Trump and Netanyahu. And what's even more insane is that they have devoted followers who can't see through it all.
5
TheTiddyQuest1 day ago
+1
Israel has already bombed Lebanon again lmao.
Israel and the US can never stick to any ceasefire.
1
DueAd90051 day ago
+2463
Call me crazy, but someone facing a corruption trial shouldn't be leading a country (especially when he can delay said trials by starting wars).
2463
TurbulentPromise48121 day ago
+642
Or getting elected
642
RampantPrototyping1 day ago
+102
Nah that can backfire. A very corrupt president (cough) could have his weaponized DOJ put his most powerful political opponents on trial a week before the election and take their names off the ballot
102
farazormal1 day ago
+67
Well that undermines the innocent until proven guilty, if the judiciary just has to have a trail coming up and not actually prove you’re done anything wrong then they can prevent innocent people from being elected.
Regardless, f*** Netanyahu
67
IntermittentCaribu1 day ago
+8
Nobody that wants to be elected should ever be elected.
8
Yglorba1 day ago
+12
That's a glib saying, but I don't agree. Leading a nation is actual *work*; we need people in office who will do that work. Even saying "they shouldn't want power" is a bit off - there's nothing wrong with wanting power to *make things better*, or to fix problems, or things like that.
What we shouldn't have are people who just want the office for the prestige, or people who want power for its own sake. The worst leaders are the ones who blatantly just see their office as a trophy to be claimed or a chance to enrich themselves.
(Well, or the leaders who want to do bad things, but there's no one principle, let alone law, that can protect us from that.)
12
IMGcertified1 day ago
+370
I guess we are both crazy I never thought a convicted felon with multiple indictments named in the Epstein files as a probable pedofile could be voted in to lead a country either 🤔....
370
twitterfluechtling1 day ago
+54
Maye that would be a nice addition to the us legal system to exclude convicted felons from public office, if and when Republicans aren't ruling anymore?
54
MrShake41 day ago
+77
There’s a very good reason that law doesn’t exist. If that was on the books what stops Trump, or the next Trump from arresting anyone trying to run against him.
Remember that Nelson Mandela was a “convicted felon”
77
Excelius1 day ago
+27
People desperately want to fix these problems with more rules when the problem is that voters are electing madmen in the first place.
27
AdonoftheStormySeas21 day ago
+7
Exactly the case. Education that requires critical thinking about political and historical topics, based on evidence instead of gut feelings, and stricter regulation of the media especially inflammatory outlets would do much more than laws on who can't be elected. All that would be is a band-aid.
7
ImaginaryCheetah1 day ago
+5
another current example is [out of greece](https://www.politico.eu/article/greece-yanis-varoufakis-stand-trial-after-admitting-drug-use-36-years-ago/).
can't run for office if you've been convicted of drug use.
5
wecanhaveallthree1 day ago
+22
I'm sure you can understand how excluding felons from running for public office could be misused.
22
twitterfluechtling1 day ago
+6
If political opponents can simply be convicted of some bs to stop them, the system is broken already. The sitting president could just use the phony conviction to put the oponent in prison.
The premise must be you have a democracy first, with separation of the three powers, then you have such a law to protect the democracy.
6
dbratell1 day ago
+14
I know that you mean well, but such tools are abused a lot in authoritarian or fascist countries that pretend to be democracies. Get your opponent convicted on minor or made up charges and sadly they have to withdraw from the next election.
14
Calculonx1 day ago
+22
They'll start crying how it's unconstitutional to exclude pedophiles from running
22
twitterfluechtling1 day ago
+10
The convictions weren't for pedophilia, right? Unfortunately. I wish for him being convicted and punished for that.
Of course, restrictions to hold office can onbe based on convictions, not open trials. Otherwise it would be weaponized immediately by both sides.
10
BusinessDragon1 day ago
+4
His conviction was delayed to allow him continued eligibility though.
4
twitterfluechtling1 day ago
+8
Trump was convicted of felonies May 2024. That was before the election.
8
BusinessDragon1 day ago
+6
*Sentencing postponed, until in January 2025 a judge said they didn’t want to sentence since he was the elected president.
6
twitterfluechtling1 day ago
+11
My point. He was a convicted felon, it should not be possible to evade punishment by getting elected after the conviction.
11
nezroy1 day ago
+5
Do you remember when harboring runaway slaves was a felony?
Do you honestly think the US is now somehow suddenly at a perfect place of moral utopia with the implementation and enforcement of its laws?
The ultimate tool of accountability that can be wielded by a functioning democracy already exists, and it's the voting booth.
If you cannot trust the voters then no amount of arbitrary, easily-abused eligibility restrictions are going to save your government.
5
toofine1 day ago
+3
They proudly voted for the felon and thought the billionaire felon loved them more than he loves himself... The MAGAt combination of bottomless stupidity and narcissism has led to something that makes falling in love with a stripper look like genius.
3
licensed2jill1 day ago
+1
And by the party of law and order family values
1
latherrinseregret1 day ago
+63
The crazy thing is that Netanyahu said the exact same thing years ago when Olmert was prime minister and tried for corruption.
63
onefst250r1 day ago
+17
Every accusation is a confession.
17
NoConfusion94901 day ago
+12
Yeah, but then the government could start corruption trials on all of their opponents. Not defending him, to be clear, but there's a reason we don't punish people before they're tried.
12
Winter_Body47941 day ago
+22
Side Eyes so hard it hurts
22
mrflash8181 day ago
+5
\+1
So far it seems my current reality does not have anything that meaningfully extends a person's maximum lifetime before dying from old age, and I am grateful for the failure.
Because, I live in a reality (born too soon?) where some evils that some people do, seem to have no way to be stopped, except by their death from old age.
Knowing they are old. Older than me. Knowing that in spite of their wealth or unbounded corruption, they cannot buy or bargain or con or blackmail their way to a longer life. Knowing they are closer to death every day...
It's the thing that can provide hope: that evil people die. And when they die, hopefully less evil will be in the world. Less harm will be in the world.
5
External-Praline-4511 day ago
+8
Exactly! WTF, seriously. He shouldn't be allowed an incentive for him to ruin millions of lives. Normal people get suspended from their positions whilst investigations are concluded, the leader of a country should be held to the same or higher standards.
8
peelen1 day ago
+5
> facing a corruption trial shouldn't be leading a country
I mean, the most basic rule of law is: innocent until proven guilty
That would be an easy way to get rid of your oponents: by bogus trial
5
TheMoves1 day ago
+8
I mean yeah but it's on the people. You can't punish someone *ahead* of a conviction because that's not justice (and anyone could *easily* use it to rig elections, just put an opponent on trial for something and disqualify them without needing a conviction), but the people should know better than to elect someone facing these kind of charges on principle. Unfortunately though they're pretty ride or die for this guy over there.
8
Volodio1 day ago
+3
In Israel people vote a party, not for a representative. Obviously Netanyahu's personality itself matters, but his party is bigger than him and it is decades old.
3
TheMoves1 day ago
+8
Yes but Bibi has been a central figure in Likud for over 3 decades and the Israeli people obviously know full well that when they vote for Likud they are voting for Bibi to be PM, there's no illusion there
8
efficient_giraffe1 day ago
+2
This is an extremely bad excuse. Honestly baffling how stupid it is.
2
xmuskorx1 day ago
+3
Trial =/= conviction. Perhaps we should not hold people guilty until convicted? Or are we done with presumption of innocence or something?
3
Purgii1 day ago
+3
Or a convicted felon.
3
yiliu1 day ago
+2
The voters shouldn't _vote_ for people facing corruption charges.
You can't pass a law against it, or Trump and Netanyahu would immediately instruct their justice departments to go after their political opponents.
2
Mist_Rising1 day ago
+2
I believe in in Innocent till proven guilty, but he should not be able to DELAY the trial.
2
Bmandk1 day ago
+2
I'm NOT defending Netanyahu or anyone else, but this is a stupid take. Innocent until proven guilty. Otherwise, *anyone* can start a bogus corruption trial, or even the current government can do it against an upcoming competitor.
If the people are electing felons, then the issue is not with the elected.
2
Standard-Contest-9491 day ago
+4
Hey the United States can have a convicted felon as president I say it’s fair. Lol
4
ACMomani1 day ago
+1
No conflict of interest there..
1
Due_Wrangler94611 day ago
+1
Then just sue whatever leader you don't like for corruption so that they have to leave. Even if the trial finds them innocent it will be too late.
1
JesusWuta40oz1 day ago
+1
Well its more like hes given emergency powers that exclude/pause things like his trail until the "crisis" is "resolved".
1
A_Furious_Mind1 day ago
+1
Does seem to create potential for some kind of moral hazard.
1
Medicivich1 day ago
+1
Someone in the Trump-Epstein files should not be in charge and starting a war, but at least there is news that men will automatically be registered for the draft.
1
VoidOmatic1 day ago
+1
You wouldn't even be able to get a government clearance, let alone lead a country.
1
Mannipx1 day ago
+303
Cease fire ends on saturday
303
DerpsAndRags1 day ago
+22
Check the stocks!
22
RandyMuscle1 day ago
+163
Did the ceasefire not already end?
163
purplenapalm1 day ago
+62
Which one? AFAIK the one between Israel and Hezbollah just started unless something changed within the last hour.
The US/Iran(and it's allies) is so insanely murky it's hard to say because both sides claim they have victory and both sides claim the ceasefire is based on different peace plans. You have the international community praising the peace while the Strait has been closed and it doesnt seem like the cease fire exists...but hostilities have cooled significantly. We seem to be in a weird purgatory at the moment.
If and when this ends everyone will be a loser while claiming victory.
ETA: My post is incorrect. There was no ceasefire with Hezbollah or Lebanon. I was remembering incorrectly. I was referring to Netanyahu being open to direct talks with LEBANON which is far different than a ceasefire. I should double check before positing next time.
62
Icangooglethings931 day ago
+40
“There is no ceasefire in Lebanon” - Netanyahu today at 2pm est…. So yeah no, there’s basically no ceasefire anyways in my opinion.
40
fury4201 day ago
+10
> AFAIK the one between Israel and Hezbollah just started unless something changed within the last hour.
do you have a source on this?
10
purplenapalm1 day ago
+9
No, I was incorrect on my varbiage and the parties involved. Netanyahu approved talks with Lebanon which i believe halted hostilities...
https://apnews.com/live/iran-war-israel-trump-04-09-2026
ETA: the link to this live thread has Netanyahu clearly stating there is no ceasefire.
9
fury4201 day ago
+2
Understood, I'd read about that and thought I'd missed a subsequent development.
Sadly, history has shown us that agreement between Israel and Lebanon isn't nearly enough by itself.
I mean, in a vacuum the actual terms of the 2024 ceasefire sound great, as do the 2006 terms that led to UN Security Council Resolution 1701... except that they were agreed to with Lebanon rather than Hezbollah, and Lebanon isn't actually in a position to follow through with agreements to disarm Hezbollah.
2
UnknownHero21 day ago
+2
No it didn't. The ceasefire was between iran and the US and to a lesser extent Israel.
This is geopolitics the text of any law or agreement isn't worth the paper its printed on. Any discussion of violation of some detail is a conversation for stupid people. But if you wanted to engage in it Israel bombed Lebanon which is an entirely different country. (hint that last sentence is bait for someone to argue about)
America isn't bombing Iran right now. Israel isn't either. Iran hasn't shot anyone or sunk any ships. That's a ceasefire.
2
windingsand1 day ago
+1
Who knows at this point man
1
Qanaesin1 day ago
+77
Hmm one corrupted president joined with another one to start a war to stop a trial, neato
77
CameltoeGlamourShots1 day ago
+9
*You keep me out of court and I’ll help them forget you’re a child rapist.*
9
Unfair_Resolution8361 day ago
+43
Anyone wanna venture a guess what is going to happen before sunday?
43
MuJartible1 day ago
+26
More people dying for all these cunts, probably.
26
epicredditdude11 day ago
+102
Alternate headline
“Halt on Iran attacks mean Iran attacks will resume by Sunday”
102
gurney__halleck1 day ago
+12
exactly..they're just waiting for markets to close on Friday before resuming attacks on iran
12
Scottamus1 day ago
+25
"His trial, which began in 2020 and could lead to jail terms, has been repeatedly delayed due to his official commitments, with no end date in sight."
These guys are masters of avoiding justice.
25
IceMysterious30561 day ago
+15
Oh he in deep shit so war must go on?
15
SnivyEyes1 day ago
+44
Stop electing criminals to office. Him and Trump have no business being leaders with how much destruction and damage they have caused along with all the illegal shit they’ve done.
44
gkpetrescue1 day ago
+13
“His trial, which began in 2020..” wtf
13
Medallicat1 day ago
+12
This is why Trump and Bibi started the war in Iran. They are both criminals trying to avoid prosecution
12
kentucky_mule1 day ago
+9
Can US also get back to Epstein files?
9
devilmaskrascal1 day ago
+7
Now we understand why he bombed Lebanon to try to mess up the ceasefire.
7
StemCellPirate1 day ago
+7
When Bibi files?
7
pkosuda1 day ago
+6
We already know how much Trump loves timing military operations for Fridays when markets are closed. Something tells me he’ll he getting a call from his boss Netanyahu soon if they haven’t spoken already.
6
beekeeper19811 day ago
+7
Getting indicted for and continuing war crimes to avoid a corruption trial.
7
ptwonline1 day ago
+5
Gonna ask the Magic 8-Ball if Bibi will get mysteriously sick again but only on days he is supposed to testify.
Or if there will be some kind of conveniently-timed attack on Israel he'll need to spend the next few years responding to as an emergency.
5
MrBogardus1 day ago
+5
Him and trump have lots in common
5
NoonDread1 day ago
+5
Amazing how the leaders of the two nations who attacked Iran are both corrupt as f***.
5
Tukkegg1 day ago
+4
oh don't worry, he'd find a very convenient health emergency to skip it again, anyway.
4
Psyched_investor1 day ago
+4
Let's go to jail Bibi
4
JohnBPrettyGood1 day ago
+3
Corruption Trial!!!!!
If Bibi needed a distraction rather than Bombing Iran he could have just leaked a few Epstein Files.
3
K-12Slave1 day ago
+3
What are the polymarket odds that he shits himself again to get out of it?
3
AZBaldy1 day ago
+3
Expect the ceasefire to collapse any minute now…
3
Orpa__1 day ago
+3
If that is so then why is Trump going to bomb Iran again as soon as the market closes for the week?
3
hylo231 day ago
+3
Epstein calling... are you on the line?
3
InevitableAvalanche1 day ago
+3
Oh, can we get Trump/Republican corruption trial now too?
3
Yetiius1 day ago
+2
I suspect another round of attacks incoming.
2
Galappie1 day ago
+2
Friday or Saturday will be really interesting then.
2
obalovatyk1 day ago
+2
…Sky News is reporting they started attacking Lebanon again.
2
annonyj1 day ago
+2
False flag incoming
2
Constant-Brief34101 day ago
+2
Interesting
2
HoneyBadger5521 day ago
+2
f*** yea!!
2
ThePsychopathMedic1 day ago
+2
Sooo... no halt to Iran attacks. Got it.
2
LiKaSing_RealEstate1 day ago
+2
Oh great so attacks the attacks are going to resume to delay his trials, again.
2
Cactusfan861 day ago
+4
And the reason for them bombing the hell out of Lebanon despite Pakistan saying they are part of the ceasefire suddenly becomes crystal clear
4
fiftyfivepercentoff1 day ago
+2
Release the Epstein files!
2
jert31 day ago
+2
The question should be how is it that Israel determines what America does.
Mossad has more control over the American government than does any American. Because Trump is compromised.
It's been the greatest intelligence failure in history, that all the FBI, CIA, DNI, NSA and all the others did nothing to stop a compromised political force that works for a foreign power, coming to run America.
Instead of the $100s of billions spent on (what was once considered) illegal domestic surveillance, to protect billionaires' power, one hundredth of that could have prevented the end of democracy , and civil rights, in America.
I hope it's not too late. But this new empire grows stronger every day, with little resistance.
2
va_wanderer1 day ago
+5
Trump is not only compromised, but compromised multiple directions to different powers. Putin first, but if Israel doesn't have their hands on every ugly bit in the Epstein files and then some, I'd be shocked.
Given, nobody fixed the problem in the most direct manner, which is shocking in and of itself.
5
ArbiterOfCool207211 day ago
+1
oh I see.
1
mefree19601 day ago
+1
It gave Trump the out he needed from his war crimes blunder.
1
SomeDudeSaysWhat1 day ago
+1
This is going to be a very interesting Sabbath
1
Merlins_Owl1 day ago
+1
Attacks restarting Saturday night
1
MegaMaster10211 day ago
+1
The judge for that trial is gonna magically disappear in a few days
1
xclame1 day ago
+1
Hmmm, I wonder if that's why they attacked Lebanon, Trying to stop the trial from going forward.
1
Sea-Adhesiveness12221 day ago
+1
Yeah, I’m sure a ceasefire was mentioned once but………
1
No_Tone17041 day ago
+1
Israelis simultaneously hate this guy and love him.
It’s fking weird.
1
RustedRelics1 day ago
+1
Netanyahu corruption? Say it isn’t so!
1
LangyMD1 day ago
+1
Why does a trial's schedule depend upon the actions of the man who is on trial?
148 Comments