Hannah Einbinder Slams AI Creators As “Losers”: “They’re Not Artists”

Hannah doesn’t miss 🎯

And she's right, those AI goons are fuckin pathetic

Wait…am I supposed to care about robot feelings?

And? Is this supposed to be controversial? Pretty sure even the AI content creators know this to be true. They know they are frauds. And the sad thing their content is absolute trash but it still has a audience so to me that audience is worse than the AI hacks. That is what you watch? That is what you like? Well I look down on that. Openly without remorse.

F*** AI for anything entertainment related, anyone who thinks they are creating art through AI is delusional. 

You could say she thinks they're all hacks.

AI. creators. Choose one.

I write my own lyrics as a hobby since before AI music rendering was widely available but I was never good at instruments so it’s cool to get a render for myself but I would never pretend like I’m a musician or that I even made a song that just seems silly to me

You tell them Hannah!

Queen of Queens

If I had an award to give I would(single dad). But take my love and respect!

Idk her but i love her

I’m glad she’s on the creative’s side. She’s brutal. ❤️

I remember saying the same thing about photographers who manipulated their shots in this new thing called Photoshop…

But they have to have mad prompting skills...

I'm just here to remind everyone that you can never go back to a world before genAI, it's only going to improve in quality, and it's never going away. 🥰

Someone is afraid to be replaced I presume.

Old man yelling at clouds. People will laugh at this stuff in 5 or 10 years.

I would like it perhaps to the advent of photography, when before, we had thousands of years of talented painters. Wanted a family portrait? Had to hire a painter and pay them a ton of money and take days/weeks of your time posing to get it. Wanted a picture of a beautiful mountainside in your village? Had to pay a painter a ton of money to paint it for you, or spend a lot of money going to art school and get really talented at painting yourself. Then photography came along and it was BAM...portraits were done in minutes at practically no cost. Same thing with the mountains. Were the photographs as "artistic" and take anywhere near the talent to produce? Nope. But it served a purpose, and as a result, painters had to evolve and stop painting portraits and explore other avenues that photographers couldn't capture, which ultimately made paintings more interesting and creative. There was still a market for the talent, but the craft and art had to evolve to stay ahead of the new technology. This will likely be the same for movies, TV, books, etc. There will be a whole lot of A.I. "photographers" out there. Many not do is seriously or with much effort, but some will attempt to make it their own artform and put a lot of effort into it like the best photographers do. Many will be very talented people who simply did not have the luck or connections that others had to get a foot in the business and the A.I. will give a means to have the worthy art created whereas it otherwise would not have been. It will be a huge mixture and the world will figure out ways for the cream to rise to the top. Or perhaps art and entertainment itself will change so drastically, it won't even matter. I think of the holodeck in Star Trek TNG and that's a likely future step where movies/TV become much more interactive/personal and simply watching something seems odd and blase. Also keep in mind that a LOT of film and TV would barely qualify as art and is more often than not products of marketing departments and product placement...just long or expensive commercials. Is the new Super Mario movie more worthy and a "W*****" (if no A.I. was presumably used) compared to a great screenwriter "loser" who decides to use A.I. to bring his writing to life? This isn't black or white. There's a lot of gray area and we don't know yet how the chips will fall or how things will evolve. All this said, I think we should probably ban A.I. I don't think it's going to make our lives better and every facet it touches will be worse off, except for maybe medical advances.

“Luddites slam machinists as losers: they’re not Labourers”

How could she say something so brave? /s Give it 5 years. Progress will keep marching forward. Listnooks delusion that they can scold AI out of existence will remain just that; a delusion. It's actually kind of funny to look at the history of Listnooks opinion of AI. I remember all the buzz about the 2nd Will Smith spaghetti video and how excited people were about how much better it got in such a short period of time. Then about a year later lots of folks had their "Oh shit" moment when they realized it was going to keep getting better/cheaper and radically reshape the art world. Right now its consuming short form video/influencers but it won't be long before it starts supplanting "real" media too. Personally I welcome it but I also don't work in the arts so it doesn't fill me with existential dread the way it does with many folks on this site.

Ugh, high school stereotype bullying threats? I know AI is annoying, but...

Who has frequently explored the boundaries of art, arguing that defining art too narrowly demonstrates a failure to understand its true nature. -Grayson Perry Btw for those how dared to read the article. She talk about the people who use Ai to steal jobs not the use of Ai to create for fun.