· 180 comments · Save ·
Announcements Mar 25, 2026 at 9:14 PM

HBO Boss Casey Bloys Says ‘Harry Potter’ Set Has ‘Serious Security’ Amid Death Threats Against Cast, Weighs In on His Meeting With Netflix’s Ted Sarandos and More

Posted by Shiirooo


https://variety.com/2026/tv/global/casey-bloys-hbo-max-ted-sarandos-harry-potter-1236698186/

🚩 Report this post

180 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Grunklsnort Mar 25, 2026 +983
People sending death threats to kids and actors need a hobby.
983
Horknut1 Mar 25, 2026 +241
Arguably, they have a horrible one.
241
TokoBlaster Mar 25, 2026 +43
Knitting is easier than bomb making 
43
Horknut1 Mar 25, 2026 +40
Have you tried knitting?!? ; )
40
bbk34 Mar 25, 2026 +7
“I do love knitting patterns”
7
SteveFrench12 Mar 25, 2026 +1
Deep cut
1
Oraukk Mar 25, 2026 +84
People sending death threats to literally anybody involved is fucked up.
84
iambarrelrider Mar 26, 2026 +1
Like how much hate does one have? I don’t know. Maybe I am just lazy. Or maybe they need a benzo or weed. Do things out of strength not out of weakness. Death treats are also 19th century.
1
JustChilling_ Mar 25, 2026 +78
A hobby? They need therapy.
78
muntaxitome Mar 25, 2026 +54
Anyone sending death threats to anyone else needs prison
54
BottAndPaid Mar 26, 2026 +1
Pretty sure that's the penalty for the crime.
1
palinsafterbirth Mar 25, 2026 +14
And meds
14
Rostabal Mar 26, 2026 +5
They need to be in jail
5
Jmazoso Mar 26, 2026 +1
Or a hobble
1
eldenpotato Mar 26, 2026 +1
A team of therapists
1
RGJ587 Mar 25, 2026 +120
Gotta read the article. It wasn't death threats against kids, it's Snape's actor saying that he has received death threats. Because he's black and a celebrity. All black celebrities received death threats. Because racist assholes with keyboards exist. That's abhorrent enough, we don't need to then insinuate that folks are also sending children actors the death threats.
120
Portatort Mar 25, 2026 +34
Just wait till the show actually comes out. I have zero faith people wont start bullying the young cast
34
SuicideSkwad Mar 25, 2026 +5
There was already an insane amount of backlash against him when the news came out, now there’s images of him as Snape it’s increased tenfold. I welcome this casting however there is a certain element of it which clearly hadn’t been thought out in that the flashbacks of James Potter bullying him will now look like they have racist undertones, I definitely do not think they will be recreating the scene of him being hung from a tree….. None of this is on the actor though and I’m sure he’ll do a great job
5
Ren_Kaos Mar 25, 2026 +17
He wasn’t hung from a tree, he hung in midair by his ankles and James had been lounging near a tree. If my memory serves. They could still do it, but yeah, it’s going to be hard to make it look not racially motivated.
17
Kalse1229 Mar 26, 2026 +5
They might race-swap one of the other Marauders to balance the scales. My bet would be on Lupin, since he'd be a heroic character but also not have the last name "Black" (which, let's be honest, is a little on the nose even for HP).
5
Zalvren Mar 26, 2026 +2
No it's not, unless you see everything in race focused lens. James and Harry have already reasons to hate Snape in the books that are very clear (and yes James being a bully is him being a bad person which is a whole big reveal for Harry that he has to come to terms with, not a racist though). Snape is very clearly an a****** and a bad person which people have plenty of reasons to hate independently of race (he's bullying kids as a teacher, he's using dark magic even as a kid, he's extremely biased against everyone not in Slytherin, he was a Death Eater, most people don't know it was secret for Dumbledore, he was creeping on Lily and called her a mudblood...). The books and even movies are filled with evidence of that. The only racism in the wizarding world is based on mudblood/pureblood status anyway. And Snape is on the bad side of that (in the views of most people) Even people saying "Harry disliked him as soon as he saw him" forgot that he hated him there because he had his scar hurt (due to Voldemort in Quirell) and then he learns he is headmaster of Slytherin, the house everyone presented him as evil (when he met the other a****** Draco) and then, he's confirmed as a d*** in the first class. Basically, you're all just saying black people can never play bad people/antagonists. Which is extremely reductive and kind of racist in itself.
2
TheOnyxHero Mar 26, 2026 +1
Iirc in the flashbacks in the books didn't Snape and his friends use dark magic against fellow students... lily even confronts him about it and most of them became deatheaters. I mean isn't that some justification on why James didn't like him? The movies kind of skipped over that.
1
WySLatestWit Mar 25, 2026 +24
To be fair, James Potter bullying Snape already made him look like a unnecessarily cruel prick. So it tracks.
24
Kalse1229 Mar 26, 2026 +7
Yeah. I have my own misgivings about race-swapping Snape from a story perspective (plus I still think Dan Stevens would've been an amazing choice), but it's nowhere near his fault, and obviously no one involved in the show deserves death threats. The show's only just got a trailer, and I think it deserves the benefit of the doubt (so long as a certain someone remains uninvolved with its production).
7
Sawses Mar 26, 2026 +1
I think it's nuts to get all bent out of shape over a casting choice--even when it's got some story-relevant issues like in this case. It's okay to just not think it's the correct choice. An example for me is casting a black actor for The Little Mermaid; I grew up with that character and liked that she was a redhead. I didn't see the movie until years later because it simply meant the nostalgia factor isn't there--which is pretty much all those live-action remakes have going for them. Would I have made either of those choices? No, but it's not like it's my career on the line or something. It's no big deal and says way more about the director and the suits involved than it does the actor. Who would turn down an iconic role?
1
engrng Mar 26, 2026
Wait Snape is black now? Why?
0
Larkson9999 Mar 25, 2026 +1
That's almost as hating on child actors. The reasons are worse but at least the adults are able to cope as best they can. Not saying that's right. I think online death threats are a valid reason for a 5-10 year imprisonment.
1
Lux-uk Mar 25, 2026 +14
They need more than a hobby. They need help.
14
hamlet9000 Mar 25, 2026 +18
If you read the article, the death threats were sent to the adult actor Paapa Essiedu.
18
PhillAholic Mar 25, 2026 +5
Don’t send death threats to ANYONE. 
5
r3dditr0x Mar 25, 2026 +14
Unfortunately being toxic fans IS their hobby... Imagine how fucked up and maladjusted you'd have to be to threaten an actor because you don't approve of their casting?
14
Stingray88 Mar 25, 2026 +16
People sending death threats to anyone need to be in prison.
16
LarBrd33 Mar 25, 2026 +12
not that it makes it any better, but it was probably directed at the Snape actor. People are super weird about that one. EDIT: Yes... that's exactly what the article says.
12
nkdowney Mar 25, 2026 +3
Understatement of the year goes to
3
Mentoman72 Mar 25, 2026 +4
Yeah they need to find a hobby from inside a padded cell
4
DomitiusAhenobarbus_ Mar 25, 2026 +2
They need a prison cell
2
Fun-Bag7627 Mar 26, 2026 +2
In prison
2
plutoglint Mar 26, 2026 +2
How about authors?
2
DMacNCheez Mar 26, 2026 +2
That’s such a terminally online response
2
dpman48 Mar 25, 2026 +1
What else can I do in this economy?!?
1
geodebug Mar 25, 2026 +1
Damn, dementors on social media now.
1
ZERV4N Mar 25, 2026 +1
Making license plates I would hope.
1
ShyguyFlyguy Mar 25, 2026 +1
Uuh pretty sure they need something but its not that
1
PastaVeggies Mar 26, 2026 +1
They need more than a hobby
1
deathjokerz Mar 26, 2026 +1
They need a jail room
1
veryblessed123 Mar 26, 2026 +1
No. They should be jailed.
1
Skyzfire Mar 26, 2026 +1
I am pretty sure their hobby, if they are not sending death threats, is opening up a YouTube channel that will make other people send death threats to kids and actors lol.
1
thanosbananos Mar 26, 2026 +1
Actually they need jail time. Because they won’t stop otherwise
1
Zalvren Mar 26, 2026 +1
To anyone really. Except maybe super criminals and still it's not a vigilante world (not like they're actually gonna act on those, those people are some huge cowards hiding behind anonymity)
1
ToonMasterRace Mar 26, 2026 +1
True, all these reddit progressives were violently harassing child actor Noah Schnapp for being Jewish recently.
1
[deleted] Mar 25, 2026 +2
[deleted]
2
The_Crazy_Cat_Guy Mar 25, 2026 +1
They need consequences to be honest. I think people think so little of their actions because they’re so insulated from the consequences. Something is really messed up in the system
1
[deleted] Mar 25, 2026 -6
[deleted]
-6
HMWYA Mar 25, 2026 +13
Feels worth pointing out the threats aren’t to do with JK Rowling’s bigotry, and aren’t targeted at the children. From all the reporting available, it’s racists targeting Paapa Essiedu, the actor playing Snape. Muddying the waters like this just makes it seem like trans people and their allies are the ones behind the death threats, and that untruth would massively play into JK’s hands.
13
Shinjischneider Mar 25, 2026 +3
There's a reason it's worded the way it's worded. That's unfortunately not on accident
3
Shinjischneider Mar 25, 2026 +6
That's why the death threats didn't go to the kids and weren't from trans people and allies to begin with. It's the racists being angry at Snape being played by a black guy. (Which isn't surprising considering TERFs are also always racist, so JKs Fans just act according to her) Regarding the kids. It was literally one of the first and biggest messages that got shared when news about the casting came out. "DON'T INVOLVE THE CHILDREN!! Because they most definitely don't know anything about Rowling's horribleness. They're just little kids acting." From the beginning it was clear that the only people that should be held accountable should be adult actors who claimed to be allies before signing up to this
6
5510 Mar 25, 2026
> (Which isn't surprising considering TERFs are also always racist, so JKs Fans just act according to her) uhh... what? Lots of people are "TERFs" (whether in the full blown transphobic sense of the word or even just the imperfect allies sense of the word) without being racist. That's not to defend transphobia... just saying it doesn't always come packaged with racism.
0
Shinjischneider Mar 25, 2026 +3
Sooner or later it always does. Same with misogyny. There's a reason TERFs tend to march with literal Nazis
3
MichaelMyersEatsDogs Mar 25, 2026 +2
Good thing no children are getting death threats because the people against JK are against her hate and it would make absolutely no sense to threaten kids.
2
Impossible-Joke-1775 Mar 25, 2026 +3
The cis kids aren't getting any threats. It's the black actor from racists.
3
Impossible-Joke-1775 Mar 25, 2026 -1
It's not the kids. It's Snape's actor. No one's going to threaten some white kids.
-1
TenthNazgul Mar 26, 2026 +21
I found Tim Ferris' [essay on fame](https://tim.blog/2020/02/02/reasons-to-not-become-famous/) very illuminating as to the statistically-inevitable downsides of having a large enough audience. Relevant section follows: This brings me to the topic of audience size and the metaphor of the tribe, the village, and the city. Think back to your 5th-grade class. In my case, there were 20–30 kids. Was there anyone totally off the rails in your class? For most of you, there’s a decent chance kids seemed pretty sane. It’s a small sample size. Next, think back to your freshman year in high school. In my case, there were a few hundred kids. Was there anyone volatile or unbalanced? I can think of at least a handful who were prone to violence and made me uneasy. There were fights. Some kids brought knives to school. There was even a kid rumored to enjoy torturing animals. Keep in mind: this high school was in the same town as my elementary school. What changed? The sample size was larger. Flash forward to my life in July of 2007, less than three months after the publication of my first book.  In that short span of time, my monthly blog audience had exploded from a small group of friends (20–30?) to the current size of Providence, Rhode Island (180,–200,000 people). Well, let’s dig into that. What do we know of Providence? Here’s one snippet from Wikipedia, and bolding is mine: >***Compared to the national average, Providence has an average rate of violent crime and a higher rate of property crime per 100,000 inhabitants. In 2010, there were 15 murders, down from 24 in 2009.*** *In 2010, Providence fared better regarding violent crime than most of its peer cities. Springfield, Massachusetts, has approximately 20,000 fewer residents than Providence but reported 15 murders in 2009, the same number of homicides as Providence but a slightly higher rate per capita.* **The point is this: you don’t need to do anything** ***wrong*** **to get death threats, r*** threats, etc. You just need a big enough audience.** Think of yourself as the leader of a tribe or the mayor of a city. The averages will dictate that you get a certain number of crazies, con artists, extortionists, possible (or actual) murderers, and so on. In fairness, we should also include a certain number of geniuses, a certain number of good Samaritans, and so on. Sure, your subject matter and content matters, but it doesn’t matter as much as you’d like to think. To recap: the bigger the population, the more opportunities and problems you will have. A small, self-contained town in Idaho might not have a Pulitzer Prize w***** among its residents, but it probably doesn’t need a SWAT team either. Now, here we are in 2020.   My monthly audience is larger than the size of New York City (NYC). For fun, Google “New York City” and click on “News.” On some level, those are the dynamics—good and bad—you will need to deal with if your audience is that large. But let’s assume you only have 100 or 1,000 followers. You should still wonder: At any given time, how many of these people might go off of their meds? And how many of the remaining folks will simply wake up on the wrong side of the bed today, feeling the need to lash out at someone? The answer will never be zero.
21
mzrcefo1782 Mar 26, 2026 +1
This guy started out with some grifty stuff about working out only one minute a month and being fit or something, but he evolved to being a really down to earth and sensible thinker 
1
monsieurxander Mar 25, 2026 +115
>With all actors on any kind of big IP shows — and this is obviously one of those where you’ve got, you know, passionate fans, people with a lot of opinions — it can get scary in places. So for any show like that, we anticipated it and tried to have training, you know, best practices in terms of social media and how to handle it. And obviously we’ve got a serious security team. So unfortunately, it was something that we thought might happen and we just try to be as careful as we can. So not specific to this show, but also the case with their 5+ other big IP shows.
115
mighij Mar 25, 2026 +63
At a point they should stop calling them passionate fans... Don't excuse deranged behaviour. 
63
SirGaylordSteambath Mar 25, 2026 +9
That would likely anger that group and might cause them to escalate Edit: yeah dudes, making a statement about the normalisation of toxic fan culture *is* totally worth putting these young actors lives at risk from deranged people. Toooooootallly.
9
Shinjischneider Mar 25, 2026 +3
Remember when nobody wanted to hold Trump and his fascists accountable out of fear they could escalate? How did that work out again?
3
Key_Poem9935 Mar 25, 2026 +8
“Remember when nobody wanted to hold Trump and his fascists accountable out of fear they could escalate” Not a thing that happened lol, he was impeached twice, had a multi year investigation into his Russian ties, multiple lawsuits in different states. Republicans just protected him
8
SirGaylordSteambath Mar 25, 2026 +6
This isn’t politics, I’m not American. Leave me alone with your shaming. 🤦‍♂️ They are child actors, the studio do not want any harm to come to them, they very purposefully want to avoid doing anything to incite that. Casting decisions for a TV show are completely different from holding political figures legally accountable, that was just a total non sequitur. Not everything is about Trump.
6
is_this_right_yo Mar 26, 2026 +4
hes pointing out that if you ignore a problem it wont just go away. these fans are the problem. so again hes pointing out that you cant just ignore then and act like that kind of behavior is acceptable.
4
SirGaylordSteambath Mar 26, 2026 +2
I understood fully I can’t explain it a third time Edit, why not: Nobody is proposing ignoring the threats The studio is actively responding with security measures One of those security measures is outwardly not antagonising the deranged individuals.
2
is_this_right_yo Mar 26, 2026 -1
and im telling you that calling out this kind of behavior is not the issue, allowing it to fester is. these grown people have an obsession with a childrens story adaptation, that don't seem normal. kinda really wierd honestly
-1
BloodshotDrive Mar 26, 2026 +2
“Calling out” These are hyper sensitive, potentially deranged people The language they chose was totally fine even if your random ass would prefer something more confrontational You’re steaming your diap over nothing
2
SirGaylordSteambath Mar 26, 2026 +3
Who’s allowing it to fester? What are you talking about? This behaviour is already illegal. The death threats are criminal offences being actively investigated. The studio, security teams and law enforcement would disagree with you.
3
is_this_right_yo Mar 26, 2026
you are. by saying that these people that want to these shouldnt called out because then they would hurt them. " one of those security measures is not outwardly antagonizing the deranged individuals"
0
DoctorDrangle Mar 26, 2026 +1
One thing I am certain of is that they refer everything to law enforcement. The idea that they have done nothing but hire some security is absolutely bat-shit absurd. What are you even arguing about here? That doing literally everything they *can* do is not enough?
1
Shinjischneider Mar 26, 2026 +1
The one's who got threatened aren't the kids though. The only one endangering the kids is Rowling herself when she invited Prince Edward on set. Seems to me you willfully misconstrue the whole situation
1
SirGaylordSteambath Mar 26, 2026 +1
The jump from “death threats against cast” to “actually it’s Prince Edward who is the threat” is genuinely unhinged The accusation of wilful misconstruction is the cherry on top.
1
DoctorDrangle Mar 26, 2026 +1
What is the group? I am being genuine and serious. Who is threatening them? Or is it coming from all sides? You refer to the group like it is known and obvious, which only makes me question whether I even know which group we are talking about. I can see hate from all sides here. I am about as neutral as it gets here, so please nobody shoot me for inquiring.
1
SirGaylordSteambath Mar 26, 2026 +1
….the group sending the death threats
1
Chespineapple Mar 25, 2026 +4
I mean it was important for the headline to specify only this show, because then readers can be rest assured that it's only talking about those uppity *baaad* folks who are being toxic for those annoying political debates they keep bringing up, and that you can rightfully shit on them if they tell you they're actively being banned from public life as the marketing cycle begins or whatever.
4
Horknut1 Mar 25, 2026 +188
Death threats?! What are we doing people?
188
BritishHobo Mar 25, 2026 +87
We gotta shut the internet down, seriously. It's allowed the anti-social people who used to be shunned the opportunity to gather and spread
87
anormalgeek Mar 25, 2026 +27
The anti social people, AND the insane people, AND the really dumb people. That's how flat earth believers became a thing.
27
FLBrisby Mar 25, 2026 +10
Bill Burr put it best: We are not mature enough as a species to use this townie bar they call the internet.
10
notathrowaway75 Mar 25, 2026 +3
Death threats to actors have been a thing before the internet.
3
BakedMitten Mar 26, 2026 +1
do you have some examples? They would be helpful
1
tekko001 Mar 26, 2026 +1
Helpful to whom? The people making the death threats?
1
Horknut1 Mar 25, 2026 +4
I feel you. But that's not the answer. That feels similar to, these books are bad. Let's burn all bad books. I don't see how you could ever conceivably shut down the internet.
4
rcolesworthy37 Mar 26, 2026 +4
There just needs to be some limit to the amount of anonymity you get on the internet. I’m not sure where to draw that line, but there needs to not be a way where you can send completely anonymous death threats and hate speech
4
Lux-uk Mar 25, 2026 +2
Internet just gives shitty people a platform. Closing it down would still mean there is shitty people. Just needs to be better healthcare and education so people don't end up this way.
2
LunchThreatener Mar 26, 2026 +3
Lmao, do you seriously think better healthcare and education would solve this? Do you think there aren’t insane people on the internet in Scandinavia?
3
BritishHobo Mar 25, 2026
Yeah it's a fantasy that could only work on movie logic really. Someone destroys it and everyone walks hand-in-hand into the sunshine. The real solution is going to be much more complicated and difficult.
0
Jerthy Mar 25, 2026 +2
Don't worry, with the amount of rogue AIs out there, we will be building The Black Wall soon enough.
2
1egg_4u Mar 26, 2026 +1
It also encourages people to incite this kind of behaviour for engagement which pans out to financial gain
1
magirevols Mar 26, 2026 +1
Sadly where there is good there will always be evil
1
rcolesworthy37 Mar 26, 2026 +1
The anonymity of the Internet is the biggest double edged sword ever. Not sure if there’s a good way to fix it
1
FiammaOfTheRight Mar 26, 2026 +1
iPhone allowing hordes of normies on what previously was nice and tidy web space was a mistake. Gimme back 00s internet please, with forums, reputation, lack of social networks and shit where peak of shitposting was going to off-topic threads and throwing crappy gifs at eachother
1
fucuasshole2 Mar 25, 2026 +1
It’s happened long before internet, and will continue to occur long after we are scrapping at each other under nuclear rubble
1
the_pedigree Mar 26, 2026 +1
Yall are wild, pretending like it hasn’t always been like this. Super convenient this story drops the same day as the teaser as well.
1
BakedMitten Mar 26, 2026 +1
"Shirley Temple had to dodge snipers to make an appearance on the Today Show so this is no big deal" is a crazy position to stake out.
1
BritishHobo Mar 26, 2026 +1
It's not convenient at all, the current make-up of the internet makes this inevitable for every opinion that there is. Whatever your political views are, or your opinions on any given topic, it's guaranteed these days that someone who agrees with you will take it to the most extreme place, and will then be held up as representative of your opinion.
1
Creative_Eye7413 Mar 25, 2026 +5
These people are insane. The number one thing I hate about online forums is that they allow for people like this to find each other and build each other up
5
Horknut1 Mar 26, 2026 +1
Anonymously is a big part of it.
1
Creative_Eye7413 Mar 26, 2026 +2
Definitely. Saying some of the shit people say online in public would get them punched in the face
2
dwpea66 Mar 25, 2026 +9
How else are we gonna address the horrible, repugnant crime of casting an actor that doesn't look exactly like their book character??
9
Horknut1 Mar 25, 2026 +1
Won't somebody think of the children?!? Wait...
1
King_Hippos Mar 25, 2026 +3
They’re cowards doing coward shit, sending death threats, wtf is wrong with them??? 
3
XuX24 Mar 26, 2026 +1
With how the internet is nowadays I don't even know if most of then are legit. We live in the era of bots that I wouldn't be surprised if someone whole life is just being an annoying pos online.
1
karmagirl314 Mar 25, 2026 +58
Anonymity makes people feel so entitled to do the most unacceptable shit.
58
NKD_WA Mar 25, 2026 +33
Unfortunately anonymity has little to do with it. That was our theory early on the web when people still valued anonymity, but we found out different in the era of social media. People say the most horrendous shit right next to their real name, a picture of their face, and right above a post of them smiling with their kids and dogs. It's less about anonymity and more about realizing there are often no consequences.
33
KrigtheViking Mar 25, 2026 +17
There was a study recently that suggested people who are awful online are often just as awful in real life. The difference is just that they're harder to avoid online. Makes sense to me.
17
twitchy-y Mar 25, 2026 +7
Also no matter how much of a d*** you are, online there'll always be some crowd available to validate your behavior. Like snark subs etc...
7
ProfessionalNight959 Mar 26, 2026 +1
Honestly, I hope it's this way though. It's more "comforting" that assholes are assholes anywhere and not that anonymity brings the worst (or honest) parts of people out, even the decent ones.
1
Filias9 Mar 26, 2026 +1
They also surround with similar minded people easily and see such behavior as normal and even celebrated. Algorithms supports it too - it has big engagement.
1
hamnewtonn Mar 25, 2026 +1
So you're saying you see people making death threats on social media which go unpunished?
1
dapala1 Mar 26, 2026 +1
Yeah okay, but what about the anonymous ones? I feel like you just changed the subject.
1
lvl_60 Mar 25, 2026
Welcome to the last stage of digital/information age. We re doomed.
0
CRoseCrizzle Mar 25, 2026 +37
I'm not fond of a Harry Potter reboot cash grab but making death threats to people who are just doing a job is crazy.
37
MichaelMyersEatsDogs Mar 25, 2026 -2
These racist chuds do this every time
-2
keeleon Mar 26, 2026 +8
The irony of whose most likely sending death threats to a Harry Potter project lol
8
DoctorDrangle Mar 26, 2026 +2
I assumed it was racism based, but the more I think about it, I think some of it is almost certainly rowling hate
2
Tube_Warmer Mar 26, 2026 -10
I think you'll find its the anti JK losers this time. They are not at all happy about this putting more money in her pocket.
-10
MichaelMyersEatsDogs Mar 26, 2026 +11
If you could read you would know it’s not
11
ilevelconcrete Mar 25, 2026 +13
There should probably be a conversation about how literally any media output, social or otherwise, invokes violent rhetoric aimed at anyone and everyone. But instead, we just get articles centered around celebrities that are mostly used as a front for whatever culture war takes people feel compelled to post.
13
VoDoka Mar 26, 2026 +1
Only recently I felt like I finally understood the saying: "the medium is the message".
1
karpet_muncher Mar 25, 2026 +3
Absolutely unhinged.
3
patricksaurus Mar 26, 2026 +3
I hope arrests are being made for death threats to TV shows. I hope those kids are insulated from all of this.
3
Bebop_Man Mar 26, 2026 +5
Average Harry Potter adult reaction.
5
drhavehope Mar 26, 2026 +4
Some losers need to get a life. It’s just a dude with a wand. Some serious bums live among us
4
jaketheb Mar 26, 2026 +2
That bloody Rupert Grint is a menace!
2
melodypowers Mar 26, 2026 +2
What a rage bait headline. 90% of the interview is about the business dealing at HBO. There is one question about this. "Question: Paapa Essiedu, who is set to play Snape in the show, recently talked about some of the toxic and racist reactions to his casting, including death threats. Did you anticipate that reaction? Answer: With all actors on any kind of big IP shows — and this is obviously one of those where you’ve got, you know, passionate fans, people with a lot of opinions — it can get scary in places. So for any show like that, we anticipated it and tried to have training, you know, best practices in terms of social media and how to handle it. And obviously we’ve got a serious security team. So unfortunately, it was something that we thought might happen and we just try to be as careful as we can." While the headline is technically accurate, that isn't what the article is about.
2
ro536ud Mar 26, 2026 +6
I’d like to actually see the threats. Not saying they don’t exist but this could def be a pr move to lean into the controversy
6
Cubriffic Mar 26, 2026 +4
The actor for Snape (Paapa Essiedu) recently did an interview and mentioned [recieving death threats](https://www.starobserver.com.au/artsentertainment/paapa-essiedu-has-copped-death-threats-since-being-cast-in-new-harry-potter-series/241301).
4
sulkee Mar 26, 2026 +4
Brother. Just read the youtube comments in the trailer and that’s AFTER filters and AI auto removals. No offense but your head is in the sand if you’re not seeing it .
4
SsooooOriginal Mar 25, 2026 +5
The set means nothing when their digital and physical lives off-set will be hounded on a level unseen simply because we are escalating to a world full of troll-bots set to "harrass-to-sewerslide" that are getting more sophisticated by the day. The money can't be worth it.
5
Pickupyoheel Mar 25, 2026 +9
Wouldn’t surprise me if they are Reddit mods
9
intelligentx5 Mar 25, 2026 +4
I love Harry Potter but man some of these fans need to touch grass
4
GrabMyDrumstick Mar 25, 2026 +2
We really have created the worst possible culture, haven't we?
2
KB_Sez Mar 26, 2026 +1
I hope to hell the first thing they told the parents after they were cast was "get your kids off the internet. For gods sake, don't let them online for 8 years"
1
spasticity Mar 26, 2026 +1
It's pretty fucked up that they're getting death threats.
1
kungers Mar 26, 2026 +1
death threats are inexcusable and should really be prosecuted under the full extent of the law.
1
Top_Report_4895 Mar 26, 2026 +1
crazy Fans or Haters?
1
International-Turn3 Mar 26, 2026 +1
I get the concerns about it not living up to the movies but that is ridiculous. If you’ve don’t like it, don’t watch it and see the movie for a hundredth time. Anyone who sends death threats to people over a f****** TV show needs serious help. Some people really need to touch grass.
1
CheezTips Mar 26, 2026
> concerns about it not living up to the movies I assume it's the anti-jkr people
0
CouldIRunTheZoo Mar 26, 2026 +1
There are some sick sick people in the world. W.i.t.a.F is wrong with them??
1
TheArtofWarPIGEON Mar 26, 2026 +1
Pathetic...
1
ToonMasterRace Mar 26, 2026 +1
Clever girls. They drop these "death threat" stories preemptively a day before the story drops to try and shield the series from any criticism. It's what Ghostbusters 2016, Disney Star Wars, Rings of Power, and countless other franchises tried before from 2015 onwards.
1
olivia_artz_modular Mar 26, 2026 +1
If were an executive at HBO, I too would be talking about anything other than the millions I’m paying to the world’s most famous transphobe
1
rhunter99 Mar 25, 2026 +1
This makes me horribly sad. I really hope those kids are well insulated and protected from social media
1
HankMcStank33 Mar 26, 2026 +1
Hey I doubt it
1
everstillghost Mar 26, 2026 +1
I received death threats playing online games too. Why the hell people pretend these are serious?
1
MrMegaPhoenix Mar 26, 2026 -1
Yeah but they are helping to make Jk Rowling rich?????
-1
BondFan211 Mar 26, 2026 +1
Nothing gets people onboard the Trans rights movement more than “we’ll send death threats to children if they’re part of a show this author wrote.”
1
[deleted] Mar 25, 2026 -12
[deleted]
-12
eepsit Mar 25, 2026 -8
Oh yeah they definitely do 
-8
MoreHamms Mar 26, 2026
?
0
Jirachibi1000 Mar 25, 2026 -8
This show existing sucks and is disgusting and if you support it you're okay with supporting transphobia and lining a bigot's pockets and every adult cast member involved should be ashamed of themselves. That being said, don't send death threats to anyone. Shun them all you like, say they're scumbags for taking the job all you like, say they're supporting transphobia by being in this all you like, boycott all you like, but death threats are not the answer. Also don't blame the kids or anything, they're.....well, kids.
-8
MoreHamms Mar 26, 2026 +4
So… kids are absolved because they happen to be under the human-defined age of 18, but every adult who happens to be on the show should be ashamed? Jesus Christ. Go outside.
4
Jirachibi1000 Mar 26, 2026
They're kids. Yes you should not bully kids. Adults who make a decision to be in a show that lines the pockets of a transphobe who is using her money to help fund anti trans laws should be bullied and ashamed of themselves.
0
MoreHamms Mar 26, 2026 +2
I think you need to, again, go outside. Maybe just, don’t watch? And people who want to, will, idk, maybe watch the show?
2
Dianagorgon Mar 25, 2026 -28
I haven't seen any posts that are death threats against the actors but I have seen several posts from people upset about JKR being transphobic comparing support for the Harry Potter show to supporting Nazis. They said people watching the show are indirectly killing trans people. That rhetoric is very dangerous because unstable people might think destroying the show is noble. Before the angry aggressive HBO PR people start downvoting me: I'm not saying that I agree with them. I'm not saying those are the only death threats or that people on the right aren't also doing it. I'm posting about what I've seen recently. This sub is supposed to be a place for discussions. It's not an HBO PR fan page. I'm getting tired of HBO PR people telling people they're going to throw acid in their face or kill their pets because someone is critical of an HBO show. This is a post that I saw on X today from Siddhant Adlakha. >You can debate “separating the art from the artist,” in an epistemological sense, til the cows come home, but please know that by supporting anything Rowling touches, you’re funding dangerous political campaigns that align with views and methods of Nazism: And another post today. >JK Rowling actively uses the money she makes off of this to support anti-trans legislation, so supporting this show is supporting her.
-28
VoidWaIker Mar 25, 2026 +23
>JK Rowling actively uses the money she makes off of this to support anti-trans legislation, so supporting this show is supporting her. [I didn’t realize stating facts was dangerous rhetoric](https://www.advocate.com/news/jk-rowling-anti-trans-organization)
23
R3miel7 Mar 25, 2026 +23
“Ackshully if you’re angry at TERFS and transphobes, you’re endangering people’s lives”
23
TheEndingWasFine Mar 25, 2026 +11
The actor who plays snape has gotten death threats, they’re just not on Reddit.
11
BramptonBatallion Mar 25, 2026 -4
That’s bad. But the teaser still looked awful
-4
shyhumble Mar 26, 2026
I think as a culture we should attempt to move past Harry Potter. This is proof
0
Odd_Cake3759 Mar 25, 2026 -11
I have a feeling this is made up, but in this day and age I have doubts also
-11
Impossible-Joke-1775 Mar 25, 2026 +10
You think a black actor getting racist death threats is made up?
10
Tube_Warmer Mar 26, 2026 -2
Who the f*** is sending death threats to kids over a tv show? Those unhinged anti JK losers? F****** hell. The culture wars just get worse and worse.
-2
GreenRose0701 Mar 26, 2026 +3
The death threats aren't towards the kids, they are towards the black actor playing snape.
3
Iagut070 Mar 25, 2026 -23
People are seriously fucked in the head. Their logic makes them believe that because the creator of Harry Potter isn’t Pro-Trans, it’s okay to send hate mail AND death threats to actors that have nothing to do with her or her stance. They seriously need therapy.
-23
indianajoes Mar 25, 2026 +22
The death threats are aimed at Snape's actor for being black. That's coming from Harry Potter fans not trans allies
22
Berfanz Mar 25, 2026 +18
If you had read the article, you'd know it was racist death threats directed at Paapa Essiedu, not pro-trans fans. But it's fun to blame innocent people because it aligns with your preconceived notions.
18
ChuckGreenwald Mar 25, 2026 -85
Are the death threats coming from deranged lefties who think it's transphobic or deranged rightoids who think it's satanic
-85
DocWhovian1 Mar 25, 2026 +14
Mostly far right racists.
14
DocWhovian1 Mar 25, 2026 +27
Why the downvotes? Paapa has said himself that racists have been sending him death threats which ANY rational person should condemn.
27
ADifferentMachine Mar 25, 2026 -9
Exactly. Leftists are reasonable in hating JKR and would never involve children.
-9
DocWhovian1 Mar 25, 2026
Oh yeah the hatred for her is absolutely justified, I don't think she should be sent death threats either but she is absolutely deserving of the criticism and hatred.
0
BondFan211 Mar 26, 2026
They absolutely would.
0
← Back to Board