Hollywood is a vehicle for monoculture, which isn't something we really have anymore
196
appleparkfiveMar 15, 2026
+48
I think that's valid, but I can also absolutely see a future where a new generation totally rejects social media. It's already starting to happen slowly, but who knows if it'll really take. Eventually it'll be all 40+ year olds, with the young people taking a more minimal approach. And they'll actually be hanging out outside again. In that sort of climate, I can definitely see movie theaters having a purpose again. But we'll see.
48
PeaTasty9184Mar 16, 2026
+6
I don’t think theaters will ever go away entirely. There are still teenagers spending a ton of money on vinyl these days, for example. At worst it will become a niche subculture.
6
broha89Mar 16, 2026
+3
I’d love for this to be true but I don’t see any evidence for this to be the case
3
Downtown_SkillMar 15, 2026
+10
It's also just that social media has emerged as actual competition to movies. The time spent on social media is usually time spent for entertainment now. That's time that could be spent watching movies.
Social media is now an entertainment product/service which means it competes in a way with other entertainment services for people's time.
It may not be a direct competitor but I definitely think its changed how people consume media entertainment like movies as well as people's attention spans (you usually have to focus for a movie but social media can be consumed passively)
10
dustygreenbonesMar 15, 2026
+12
Mmmm true
12
Early-Ad277Mar 15, 2026
+5
Not necessarily. Hollywood is a vehicle for professionaly produced content. They have created businesses and platforms that catered to niche audiences many times in the past.
What really changed now is that the tech comapnies ate their cake and are gobbling up their ad dollars and audience engagement time.
They are now in a painful transition/contraction period until they reach the point where their business stabilizies and adapts to the reduced audience numbers.
But Hollywood isn't 'going away' anytime soon.
5
Cum_Fart42069Mar 15, 2026
+62
opera ballet ballet BALLET!? opera *opera* ballet.
62
bloombergMar 15, 2026
+34
*Layoffs, fewer productions and slumping ticket sales have darkened the mood in an industry that once defined American cultural power.*
*Thomas Buckley for Bloomberg News*
A group of young assistants from WME — the talent agency representing Martin Scorsese and Ben Affleck — were debating their career choices between rounds of bourbon and line dancing on a recent evening at the Desert 5 Spot bar in Hollywood.
“I got into this business because I love movies, but everyone is really worried that the movie business won’t exist anymore,” slurred one of the twentysomethings, who asked not to be identified sharing their thoughts freely.
For almost as long as it’s been around, the film industry has been pronounced dead before its time. The advent of television in the 1950s, the sale of studios to conglomerates in the 1960s, and the rise of video cassettes in the 1980s and streaming in the 2010s were all thought to be the nail in the coffin.
Now, as the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences prepares to hand out its highest awards to films and filmmakers on Sunday, the industry is once again awash in gloom. Morale has been battered by tens of thousands of layoffs, the exodus of production from California to lower-cost territories, the waning cultural relevance of cinema versus social media, declining attendance at theater chains and fears that artificial intelligence will displace traditional moviemaking.
[Read the full essay here.](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-13/hollywood-s-economic-strain-can-t-be-hidden-at-the-oscars?accessToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzb3VyY2UiOiJTdWJzY3JpYmVyR2lmdGVkQXJ0aWNsZSIsImlhdCI6MTc3MzQwNTI0OSwiZXhwIjoxNzc0MDEwMDQ5LCJhcnRpY2xlSWQiOiJUQlRZQ0ZLSVVQVVowMCIsImJjb25uZWN0SWQiOiJEMzU0MUJFQjhBQUY0QkUwQkFBOUQzNkI3QjlCRjI4OCJ9.nJFaexK5a0hlnyIMpYeiJeavwTnhNelmSFpa-3uZAcA)
34
Texas_Crazy_CurlsMar 15, 2026
+23
I used to be obsessed with movies and the academy awards. Every year I would watch all the best picture nominees. That was around 15 years ago. Cell phones and general poor etiquette at the theater ruined the entire experience. I couldn’t tell you one movie that’s nominated this year.
23
JeffTheBannedSharkMar 15, 2026
+10
I managed to see Sinners in a great crowd opening night. If it had been as bad as the previous few movies I went to, that would have actually been the final straw for me.
10
Texas_Crazy_CurlsMar 15, 2026
+3
I’ve seen one movie in the theater is the last 12 years (Hi, Barbie!) and that’s it.
3
JeffTheBannedSharkMar 15, 2026
+3
I don't blame you *at all.* I pretty much only go to the theater to see marvel movies and Alien/Predator stuff, because it's still a good time even if the crowd is awful. I would never go see something like The Northman or Bugonia in theaters because a bad crowd would irritate the hell out of me.
3
TheObesePoliceMar 15, 2026
+3
I think the last time that I went to a movie theater was when I took my son to see Deadpool 2. The last time that he went was to watch the last Jackass movie
I have gone to a few rooftop movies since, but the films were (at minimum) four or five years old. I greatly prefer that experience to going to a traditional theater
I loved going to the Alamo, but they pulled out of my area awhile back
3
black_flag_4everMar 15, 2026
+25
I don’t know how to feel about any of it. I love movies but the business side has been shady from the start. How many Harvey Weinsteins do we need? I don’t go to the movies anymore because I don’t want to pay a fortune to see a movie while annoying people text the entire time. I also don’t think movies will stop being made at any point and these kinds of articles come out every year.
25
Aggressive_Mirror878Mar 15, 2026
+10
Movies & sports used to be a great unifying force for US culture. That isn’t the case anymore. Hollywood, particularly movies aimed at securing an academy nomination, follow a depressingly formulaic trend. They seem to be movies for the politics and lens of people in the celebrity bubble. Glorifying their beliefs. The majority of Americans either don’t share their beliefs or don’t care about those things. People want to be entertained, they want to be lost in a story. Monotonous preaching a one sided ethos isn’t appealing to the audience. There is a reason why some of the best movies in history feature morally questionable characters doing things most people would frown on.
10
JayJax_23Mar 16, 2026
+2
For me it’s the loss of escapism. I’m not gonna say that political allegories can’t be done in a way that doesn’t kill it but a lot of modern writers can’t deliver it in a way that doesn’t come off heavy handed
2
misterxboxnjMar 16, 2026
+7
Maybe. Just maybe. It's the f****** price of going to a movie. A movie ticket is now like $18 for adults and $15 for kids. $81 dollars to just walk in the door for my family if 5. They'll all want popcorn and drinks too. Or, i can wait two months for it to come out on one of the streaming services and not have to deal with going in person and paying a fortune.
7
That_Jicama2024Mar 15, 2026
+30
This is what happens when people hire their friends and kiss ass to get to the top of the corporate ladder. Hollywood used to be about art and creating stories. Now it's about sucking as much revenue out of every idea until people are sick and tired of it.
30
tfrescaMar 15, 2026
+41
Hollywood was never about that. It’s always about money.
41
ForsakenRelief309Mar 15, 2026
+22
aaand sexual exploitation
22
JeffTheBannedSharkMar 15, 2026
+17
Hollywood is literally in LA because it's as far way as people could get from Thomas Edison and his lawyers. When Edison had the patent on the video camera, the only way to use one was to rent out a studio also owned by his company. The movie industry would never have taken root in America if we didn't just collectively say, "F*** that lol" and build a city of studios on the other end of the country. It's just people trying to avoid paying other people all the way down, and has been since the beginning.
17
whereegosdare84Mar 15, 2026
+2
lol you learn something new everyday.
2
JeffTheBannedSharkMar 15, 2026
+7
Also fun fact, the Edison studio was called the Black Mariah, and I'm pretty sure there's a Luke Cage villain named after it
Unfun fact: One of the first movies Thomas Edison filmed and distributed was a video of him torturing a retired circus elephant to death to show off how powerful electricity was. (He was human garbage, look into it)
7
whereegosdare84Mar 15, 2026
+8
Jesus. What a terrible day to be literate
8
mostie2016Mar 16, 2026
+1
I’m also pretty sure his company video taped the ruins and wreckage of the hurricane of 1900 in Galveston.
1
MarhycMar 15, 2026
+1
In other words he was a pimp of scientists
1
ForsakenRelief309Mar 15, 2026
+1
Lmao, this is a crazy fun fact. Thank you so much for sharing
1
juanchopanchoMar 15, 2026
+3
Hollywood is just a manifestation of who we are. Everything is enshitified for the shareholders. Private equity has bought 500 hospitals. Their medical care and death rates are worse for their patients. All for the shareholders. Also stock buy backs should be illegal.
3
Effective_Rip7478Mar 15, 2026
+41
I can’t wait to stop hearing about this shit. People’s obsession with the Oscars and the lives of celebrities is so f****** sad.
41
LinkSeekeroftheNoraMar 15, 2026
+28
What if I only care about the pretty dresses?
28
katikaboomMar 15, 2026
+23
....you know you're in the entertainment sub right? Like, I get it the sentiment, but one of the best ways to not hear/read about them is to not frequent subs that talk almost exclusively about celebrities
23
wileIEcoyoteMar 16, 2026
Still the truth.
0
sourpatch-sorbetMar 15, 2026
+2
Good thing you're in the entertainment sub...
Maybe go to where your interests are.
2
cheffartsonurfoodMar 15, 2026
+6
I get it. Also, maybe if you didn't have to pay more for popcorn and a drink than the admission, attendance would be up a bit.
6
AugieDoggieDankMar 15, 2026
+3
The Oscars are worthless
3
[deleted]Mar 15, 2026
+17
[deleted]
17
RevolutionaryGain823Mar 15, 2026
+5
At the time One Battle was released and lost money at the BO it was widely repeated by its supporters that the studio wouldn’t mind losing money in exchange for winning a bunch of Oscars.
In the past a major Oscar haul may have been valuable to a studio but I feel like those days have been gone for at least a decade now. I’m a casual film goer and I could prob only name 2/3 of the last 10 best picture winners and I don’t remember a single conversation where anyone was really talking about them irl
5
ArgentoFoxMar 15, 2026
+3
I couldn’t agree more. There are no true stars anymore, the industry is getting cannibalized by streaming, movie theatres are dying, and the industry has massive problems with creative bankruptcy across the board. No one wants to watch an award show with a bunch of self important narcissists practically masturbating in front of their peers and the industry itself is killing itself through constant bad decision making. As a fan of movies, I switched to independent and foreign films almost exclusively. And occasional TV shows.
3
InuitOverItMar 15, 2026
+2
The Oscars is a phenomenal showcase for international films. Nobody in the US would be talking about The Voice of Hind Rajab, Sentimental Value, Little Amelie, etc etc if not for the Oscar bump.
2
ArgentoFoxMar 15, 2026
-1
The type of person that watches the Oscars is the exact type of person that wouldn’t give a shit about foreign films. A lot of people that appreciate indie and foreign films simply don’t need the Oscars to showcase anything for them. For example, people were screaming about how good Parasite was before it was even nominated.
-1
InuitOverItMar 16, 2026
+3
We have very different experiences with people who watch the Oscars. The capes-and-popcorn crowd don't give a shit about the Oscars and think a PTA movie is too "artsy fartsy" for them. To care about the Oscars is to care at least somewhat about expanding your cinematic tastes, and putting Sentimental Value and The Secret Agent into the best picture conversation is a great way to get those films (and others like them) exposure to a wider audience.
Yes, there is another tier of foreign film lover that doesn't need the academy to turn them onto movies, but that number is a drop in the ocean compared to the number of people who will watch a best picture nominee despite subtitles.
3
broha89Mar 16, 2026
+1
Dafuq are you talking about? The people who follow the Oscars overlap greatly with the people who care about foreign/indie movies. For better or worse most Oscars nominees are indie art house movies which is one of the chief complaints people throw at the Oscars, that it rewards artsy movies at the expense of crowd pleasers. 2 of the BP nominees are foreign films
1
comrade333Mar 15, 2026
+1
Its not gonna win everything. Why would it win everything?
1
BoringSubject1143Mar 15, 2026
+28
Hollywood doesn't have original ideas anymore. Let's keep making the same movies over and over, because we don't have original ideas anymore. Scream 7? Seriously? Fast and furious whatever number they're on? These movies are tired and poorly thought out from the originals. How many remakes or sequels do we need to get the point across?
28
mike_stifleMar 15, 2026
+20
You’re not totally wrong but go look at the nominees for best pic. Original films.
20
derpferdMar 15, 2026
+16
Hollywood absolutely has original ideas. That isn't the problem.
Hollywood (and the studios') willingness to take a risk on an original idea, THAT'S the problem. Part of it is also the audience psychology encouraged by streaming platforms which offers access to beloved classics that people will go to because they want to recapture the feeling of watching it for the first time.
But you can't recapture that by rewatching. You get that watching a film for the first time. An original film.
Hollywood has seen people flocking to beloved older films as evidence of them wanting those films in new clothes.
But no. They want the feeling of watching those films for the first time.
If Hollywood wants to survive, it needs to figure that out
16
Crafty_Substance_954Mar 15, 2026
+29
Original ideas and stories based on books are being produced for the first time all the time.
Whether or not you want to watch them is a different story.
Going back to the oldest silent era films there has been remakes and remakes of remakes. It’s nothing new.
29
MayorofTromavilleMar 15, 2026
+7
Yeah, people that think sequels are a new thing aren't aware of how many Frankenstein movies are part of the original franchise, including crossovers with Wolfman and Abbott & Costello.
7
pukeblood213Mar 15, 2026
+6
I’m guessing you didn’t bother to see Sentimental Value, Hamnet, or One Battle After Another. These films are incredible so I feel like you don’t know what the f*** you are talking about.
6
somepeoplewaitMar 15, 2026
+6
This has been going on since the days of Shakespeare (and before). I would love to see more original movies also, but consumers don’t see them, sending the clear message that obviously they aren’t wanted.
6
yeahnoyeahsureMar 15, 2026
+4
What? Categorically untrue. Some original box office hits nominated this year: One Battle After Another (209M worldwide), Sinners (370M worldwide), Hamnet (adapted screenplay from original source material - (99M worldwide), Weapons (269M worldwide), Marty Supreme (179M worldwide), Elio (154M worldwide)
4
somepeoplewaitMar 15, 2026
Yes, but that’s survivorship bias. Many originals have failed, and two of those are adaptations. You’re citing the successes and ignoring the failures.
Hollywood is a business. They make what predictably money.
0
yeahnoyeahsureMar 15, 2026
+1
Huh? It’s not bias, those are for all intents and purposes original works that were bangers. The point is people have a hunger for it. Those movies are in the top 30 grossing of the year, some in top 20. And there are very few original films given the level of marketing some of them were given. I work in the industry and I know how these fools think. They’re lazy. There was a time when the studio head actually cared about quality believe it or not. The National cynicism of America has a lot to do with the current state of things, but the main issue is tech companies taking over a business they have no understanding or care for.
1
somepeoplewaitMar 15, 2026
+1
I specifically said “survivorship bias.” Again, you’re citing the successes and ignoring the failures.
I also want original films. I’m just citing a known factor in this situation; it’s hard to reasonably predict if an original film will make money.
1
yeahnoyeahsureMar 15, 2026
-1
Citing successes and ignoring failures is a cornerstone of Hollywood lol. More importantly there is a clear pattern of successful original films netting hundreds of millions. All those sequels and reboots had to start somewhere.
-1
somepeoplewaitMar 15, 2026
+2
Right, but there’s also a clear pattern of sequels/reboots/adaptations/etc. being a more consistent path to predictable box office returns these days. I’m not saying I want those movies, I’m saying they get made because they’re a safer bet.
2
yeahnoyeahsureMar 15, 2026
That’s a risk vs reward situation. And the issue is that even though Hollywood is a “business” it used to be partially based in integrity. There were always blockbusters but often times even those were original or adapted from original novels, not sequels and reboots and Batman 45. It’s ok to have those things but the issue is when they don’t take any small risks or buffer their library with films that might not make 300M but still will turn a generous profit, like comedies and romcoms. There is a demand for those things but Hollywood relegates them to streaming now out of a fundamental misunderstanding about how the culture doesn’t guide things but is often guided by what’s presented to them. Several movie theaters have just upped their runs for films because of the demand for theaters returning, when just a year ago tech companies were acting like Movie Theaters were goners. The thinking now is, if we can’t not only make a giant profit and also make bank on merchandise and other tie-ins, it’s not worth it. It’s greed and it’s kinda sad. It’s saturated the market. And sorry but the model isn’t predictable, execs are some of the biggest dummies in town.
0
Puzzleheaded_Low9282Mar 15, 2026
-2
This is an incredibly shallow view of the situation. People gobbled up original stories in the 70s-2010s. The reality is people have lost faith in Hollywood to entertain them. Pair that with the fact that kids no longer see movies in the theatre in their free time and you have what we’re seeing. Hollywood has to prove they aren’t some big propaganda machine. That no matter who you are or where you’re from you can go to the movies and be entertained. I don’t believe they’ll be able to do that quickly enough to turn things around. The future is streaming services and content made by users or more depressingly…AI. The era of Hollywood is over.
-2
galileooooo7Mar 15, 2026
+2
Do you really think this is new? Have you looked into the serials in earlier eras? You know, the ones that inspired favorites like Star Wars and Indiana Jones?
2
JeffTheBannedSharkMar 15, 2026
+2
Hollywood is full of problems, but that one's on middle America in all honesty. Grown ass adults in the heartlands want to go to the theater to see movies about Fighter Jets, Barbies, and Spiderman. Americans love new IP and original ideas *on streaming,* but they won't pay theater prices or seek the "Theatrical Experience" along side them.
2
m2themichaelMar 15, 2026
+2
The number one movie this weekend is original.
You guys also act like every movie is a franchise sequel. There’s less risk financially for a sequel when originals are always throwing darts at a board to make the studio money.
Blame the movie goers for not watching originals, not the studios.
2
420cat-craft-gamer69Mar 15, 2026
+3
I think it's more: they're too afraid to try original ideas, and just go with a checklist of what audiences liked in the past. Art is being (has been) replaced with a "product" . Because most of the time, the average person is okay with it.
3
Old-Library5546Mar 15, 2026
+1
They are remaking Man on Fire, why?????
1
XciteMeMar 15, 2026
+1
Yep. Part of it is because of capitalism and how fucked up our country is right now, but part of it is also Hollywood’s own fault
1
ClosedContentMar 15, 2026
+1
While this is a valid point generally speaking, the Oscars isn’t a very good point for that. Nearly all the Oscars are original stories or fresh adaptations this year.
The only ones that contradict this is Del Toro’s Frankenstein and Zootopia 2 since it’s a sequel. If you want to be picky maybe Hamnet but even then that’s not a straight up Hamlet film, it’s more of a “fictionalized account” of how the story came to be.
1
[deleted]Mar 15, 2026
-3
[deleted]
-3
MooseMan12992Mar 15, 2026
+8
Adaptations can still feel fresh though. Like Mickey 7 and One Battle After Another were adaptations of novels
8
ClosedContentMar 15, 2026
+3
That’s why there’s a category for Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Original Screenplay.
There is an argument for Hollywood in general being out of ideas for mainstream blockbusters. But the Oscars certainly try to highlight original and fresh adaptation works. The only one that doesn’t really fit that mold this year is “Frankenstein” since it has been adapted countless times.
3
[deleted]Mar 15, 2026
[deleted]
0
MooseMan12992Mar 15, 2026
+1
Weird, having read the book already makes me want to see the movie 5 times more
1
DulgoronMar 15, 2026
That’s cool! I realise I have the unpopular opinion else they wouldn’t keep making them
0
MooseMan12992Mar 15, 2026
+1
So are you against and will not watch any adaptations? Like do you think The Godfather shouldn't have been made because it was a book adaptation? Or Christopher Nolan's Odyssey coming next year?
1
[deleted]Mar 15, 2026
[deleted]
0
MooseMan12992Mar 15, 2026
+1
Oh okay so you just don't care about film
1
deathp3naltyMar 15, 2026
+1
What a weird elitist view.
1
yeahnoyeahsureMar 15, 2026
+1
It’s bit too hard and fast but lately Hollywood is reusing and remaking based on algorithms. Flushing those productions with cash and starving original ideas or comedies. It’s a serious problem.
1
2401PenitentTangentxMar 15, 2026
It's what sells. Don't blame the manufacturer blame the consumer for wanting garbage.
Nobody wanted The Bride.
Good luck
Have Fun
Don't Die
Was great and only made 9 million on a 20 million budget.
0
gotpeace99Mar 15, 2026
+13
Ah, well. Hollywood did it to themselves.
13
lingeringneutrophilMar 15, 2026
+2
The movies are simply shit. It’s that simple
2
Gen-JinjurMar 15, 2026
+2
Whenever you consolidate entertainment decisions with people who have money and zero creativity, it slowly kills that entertainment medium.
2
theboltsMar 16, 2026
+2
I can’t remember the last time I watched a movie in one sitting
2
Dragon_-slayer69Mar 15, 2026
+3
Timothee took everything from us
3
dwight_k_schrute69Mar 15, 2026
+2
Seeing movies are just so damn expensive
2
JamladMar 15, 2026
+1
I stopped paying attention to the Oscar's years ago. I can't relate to any of these people.
1
DryWafer8503Mar 15, 2026
+1
But it's Christmas for Tinseltown!
1
TLKimballMar 16, 2026
+1
Are you a Christmas Adventurer?
1
_TheLonelyStonerMar 15, 2026
+1
A certain section of the internet is going to be very upset tonight if things go how they’re looking to go. I already got my popcorn ready lol
1
bluehawk232Mar 15, 2026
+1
Just watching for conan
1
AlwaysAGroomsmanMar 15, 2026
+1
group of young assistants from [WME ](https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/0122951D:US)— the talent agency representing Martin Scorsese and Ben Affleck — were debating their career choices between rounds of bourbon and line dancing on a recent evening at the Desert 5 Spot bar in Hollywood.
“I got into this business because I love movies, but everyone is really worried that the movie business won’t exist anymore,” slurred one of the twentysomethings, who asked not to be identified sharing their thoughts freely.
For almost as long as it’s been around, the film industry has been pronounced dead before its time. The advent of television in the 1950s, the sale of studios to conglomerates in the 1960s, and the rise of video cassettes in the 1980s and streaming in the 2010s were all thought to be the nail in the coffin.
Now, as the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences prepares to hand out its [highest awards](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-11/oscars-2026-can-the-academy-awards-still-captivate-a-global-audience) to films and filmmakers on Sunday, the industry is once again awash in gloom. Morale has been battered by [tens of thousands of layoffs](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2025-09-19/getting-a-job-in-hollywood-has-never-been-harder), the exodus of production from California to lower-cost territories, the waning cultural relevance of cinema versus social media, declining attendance at theater chains and fears that artificial intelligence will displace traditional moviemaking.
For employees of Warner Bros. Discovery Inc., which has *Sinners* and *One Battle After Another* up for best picture, this year’s Oscar race has been overshadowed by rival Paramount Skydance Corp.’s $110 billion deal to buy the company. It’s the third time Warner Bros. has been sold in less than a decade.
In *Sentimental Value*, another one of the best picture nominees, Stellan Skarsgard plays an acclaimed Norwegian director whose new film is being made for Netflix Inc. When a reporter asks him if the picture will appear in theaters, Skarsgard’s character says, “Sure, where else?,” at which point his producer jumps up and says: “It’s still being negotiated.”
Consumers are spending more than ever on entertainment of all sorts, but less gets “filtered down to our members in terms of employment opportunities,” *Oppenheimer* filmmaker Christopher Nolan, the president of the Directors Guild of America, said at a February press conference. With guild-member employment down 35% to 40%, he called it a “very worrying time for the industry.”
Hollywood’s anxiety — the local industry’s challenges are often compared to the decline of automaking in Detroit — isn’t misplaced. The crisis has grown to such magnitude that last year, California [doubled the annual assistance](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-12-20/hollywood-is-getting-left-behind-in-recovering-film-tv-industry) it gives to film and TV productions to $750 million to stop them from fleeing the state.
While that’s succeeded in securing the production of some big-budget films, including a new *Jumanji* from Sony Group Corp., there’s a bigger issue, as many studios are simply undertaking fewer projects. Studios are spending less on film projects since the actor and writer strikes in 2023, and some media companies are reallocating programming budgets to sports and live events.
FilmLA, which tracks permits in Los Angeles County, reported a 16% decline in shooting days in 2025 and a drop of nearly half from the recent peak in 2018.
# Lights, Camera, Not Much Action
ProdPro, an industry data tracker, said in February that sentiment among 850 crew members surveyed about their prospects for 2026 was generally more negative than in recent years, with sound technicians and dolly grips experiencing an average of six months of downtime between productions.
The decline has had a ripple effect on associated businesses. Earlier this year, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. [seized the Radford Studio Center](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-14/goldman-to-acquire-famed-la-film-lot-after-1-1-billion-default), a famed Hollywood lot whose owners defaulted on the mortgage. Arri Group, a camera and lighting supplier, cut jobs and closed two locations in Germany.
Even when films are produced and released in theaters, few draw crowds large enough to keep the industry afloat, let alone thriving. North Americans are going to the movies about half as often as they used to a decade ago, based on the number of tickets sold at cinemas in the US and Canada. At the same time, revenue from international markets such as China, long a cushion for any stateside softness, has become unpredictable, hurt by geopolitical tensions and more competition from local productions.
Those pressures, as well as the impact of pandemic shutdowns, have hurt theater chains including Regal owner Cineworld, Alamo Drafthouse, Ipic, Metropolitan, CMX and Look Dine-In, which all filed for bankruptcy in the past five years. AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc., the world’s largest cinema chain, has lost 99.7% of its value since the stock hit an all-time high in June 2021.
“The bottom line is that the theater business is in a very dark and troubled place, and the reality is you need people that are investing in the entertainment business,” Rich Greenfield, a media analyst at LightShed Partners, said in a recent interview with Bloomberg TV.
# Box-Office Blues
David Ellison — Paramount’s chief executive officer and the son of Oracle Corp. Chairman Larry Ellison — is pledging to invest. He’s seeking to release 30 films in cinemas annually from Paramount and Warner Bros. combined once his proposed deal closes.
Netflix Inc., [which dropped out](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-09/netflix-goes-from-m-a-loser-to-market-w*****-without-warner-deal) of the bidding for Warner Bros. in February, plans to increase its programming budget by about 10% to $20 billion this year.
Get the Bloomberg Weekend newsletter.
Big ideas and open questions in the fascinating places where finance, life and culture meet.
By continuing, I agree to the [Privacy Policy](https://www.bloomberg.com/notices/) and [Terms of Service](https://www.bloomberg.com/notices/tos/).
Netflix, Paramount and others are also experimenting with AI in a way that could empower new kinds of storytelling. Lionsgate Studios Corp. has partnered with startup Runway AI Inc. to lower production costs, and Walt Disney Co. has signed a deal to [license its intellectual property](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-12-11/disney-invests-1-billion-in-openai-strikes-licensing-deal) to OpenAI Inc., which developed the Sora video creation tool. Netflix is also [paying as much as $600 million](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-11/netflix-to-pay-as-much-as-600-million-for-ben-affleck-s-ai-firm) to acquire InterPositive, the AI moviemaking company founded by Affleck, Bloomberg has reported.
“While we can point to current indicators like job cuts or offshoring, we can also point to exciting developments as new story forms emerge,” Holly Willis, chair of the University of Southern California’s media arts and practice division, said in an interview.
For the cultural relevance of film to survive, the business needs to make inroads with younger, perpetually online generations. They’re used to accessing free content on social media platforms instead of paying for a movie ticket. Encouragingly, recent events and data show that the two are becoming complementary.
In February, *Iron Lung*, a $3 million film directed by YouTube creator Mark Fischbach, took in $51 million at the box office. Better known as Markiplier, Fischbach urged his followers on social media to see the picture in cinemas.
Starting in 2029, the Oscars will also be streamed globally on YouTube, which the academy hopes [will attract new audiences](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-11/oscars-2026-can-the-academy-awards-still-captivate-a-global-audience) and reinvigorate the ceremony’s popularity after years of declining viewership.
A still from *A Minecraft Movie.Photographer: Capital Pictures/Alamy*
Signs are already emerging that feature films are seeing a resurgence among younger people. While moviegoing appeals to less than half of those born from 1965 to 2012, it is gaining traction among those born in 2013 and after, according to a report from industry tracker National Research Group. It estimated 59% of children in that age group preferred to see a film on the big screen.
Those younger audiences helped make *A Minecraft Movie*, based on the popular video game of the same name, one of the highest-grossing films of 2025.
There’s also evidence that younger audiences are discovering older movies when studios rerelease them in cinemas — an encouraging sign that, for all the talk and fears of its demise, the movie business will continue to exist for years to come.
“This isn’t the first time that the film industry’s future has looked uncertain, but our research suggests that there’s reason to be cautiously optimistic that future generations will carry the torch forward,” said Fergus Navaratnam-Blair, an analyst and vice president at National Research Group.
Like their great-great-grandparents may have done at the height of Hollywood’s Golden Age, younger generations are the most likely to watch movies on opening weekend for the same reason as their forebears, Navaratnam-Blair said: “They want to be part of the buzz and social momentum around new releases.”
1
Illustrious_Rope8332Mar 15, 2026
+1
Remember how hot the industry was before the SAGAFRA strikes? The union forced studios to learn how to provide c**** content, and the studios never returned to the old model.
1
gretzky9999Mar 15, 2026
+1
I haven’t watched an award show for years.
1
kitkatclub_visitorMar 15, 2026
-6
The American propaganda machine is faltering. Oh no.. anyways.
-6
thinnerzimmer87Mar 15, 2026
+3
Yeah, every movie produced is cia propaganda. Brilliant detective work alex jones.
3
formerNPCMar 15, 2026
-3
Maybe if someone came up with an original idea once and awhile instead of endless remakes and live action cartoons, people would be more interested in seeing movies. The latest class of actors are lame imitations from the past and what passes for talent is laughable. AI will put the final nail in the coffin and the sad part is no one will even notice the difference.
-3
thinnerzimmer87Mar 15, 2026
+1
What a stupid, fatalistic take.
1
formerNPCMar 15, 2026
So you enjoy the garbage that passes for entertainment.
0
thinnerzimmer87Mar 15, 2026
+2
They release 100s of movies a year. Which are you even talking about?
2
WinterMedicalMar 15, 2026
Guess what, when you get to know them, celebrities are just like your annoying co workers just better looking. We need to go back to the days of them keeping quiet and doing what their PR people say.
100 Comments