> The hospital CEOs pushed back, saying the higher fees are because hospitals are often reimbursed below the cost of providing the care, particularly by government programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
There it is… “It isn’t our fault! We HAVE TO charge outrageous prices!”
To be fair, they’re not wrong, the health insurance corrupted cost of providing medical care in the US is basically gambling with every patient.
These hearings are just ridiculous theatre at this point. It’s not the individual hospitals, clinics, doctors, or even CEO’s that are the problem. It’s so, so, so, obviously a systemic problem and they hold these hearings to show their constituents how much they super duper really care to create some headlines and then next week nothing will happen and it will be back to business as usual.
4042
dabeemanApr 29, 2026
+1873
yet ask them why an MRI on a 30 year old machine that takes 30 minutes costs $5000+ and they have no answer.
go to japan and you can get a full scan for less than $500 on a machine that is brand new.
1873
FrogTrainerApr 29, 2026
+1127
Hospital near me said they would do an MRI for $300 cash. But asked that I don't tell the insurance company because then they would want that price too (they bill insurance like $5k)
They basically admitted to milking insurance companies.
1127
squatch42Apr 29, 2026
+655
As someone who works primarily in property insurance, it boggles my mind that we let insurance tied to employment be the driving force behind healthcare. Almost the entire reason my job exists is to fight overcharging by contractors. And there are people on the other side whose entire job is to upcharge and supplement every estimate I write. It's absurd. It drives up premiums and it drives the honest service providers out of business.
655
ThelVluffinApr 29, 2026
+91
Contractors Charged me roughly $9k for removal and restoration after a water leak. Insurance was only willing to cover $7k. Was fun doing my own adjusting and noticing that they hadn't done $3k of what they had initially had in their estimate and let Progressive know. They went after the company for attempted insurance fraud and I also got to keep the difference of about $800.
91
poricanApr 29, 2026
+50
it’s to keep the working class in line. you’re less likely to risk organizing or demanding fair wages/working conditions if the loss of your job means the loss of your healthcare. it’s working as intended.
50
TwoPoundzaSausageApr 30, 2026
+5
Shit, with the money I could save by not paying for health insurance, I could just pay out of pocket. Most places will give you a massive self-pay d*******.
5
johnp299Apr 29, 2026
+340
The Right has done a great job of convincing people that regulation is the Devil.
340
ericmm76Apr 29, 2026
+89
I'm at least 40% sure that the right convinced people that if the public option passed that they wouldn't be allowed to ensure that they or their kids always had a white doctor.
89
SirStrontiumApr 29, 2026
+76
I will never forgive Joe Lieberman for killing the public option. He was the 60th vote needed for a filibuster-proof majority, and he refused to budge.
76
SteelyDanPeggedMeApr 29, 2026
+103
There’s magically always a Democrat or two who manages to destroy any progress. Lieberman, Manchin, Sinema, Fetterman, it’s like they are controlled opposition for capital or something
103
amethystwyvernApr 29, 2026
+32
Fettermen is a disgusting snake
32
datpiffssApr 30, 2026
+17
They get permission to by others in the party to cover their collective asses.
See Collin’s for R votes.
17
OreoMooApr 30, 2026
+13
May he rot in hell
13
rkw2Apr 29, 2026
+30
Holy shit. For some dumb reason, I had never considered America's deep-seated racism as a factor in the healthcare debate. This may or may not be true, but it certainly has the feeling of truthiness.
30
4the-Yada-YadaApr 29, 2026
+19
Or a female one. My female doctor friend has stories about men not wanting her to treat them for days. One man pointed to a male orderly in the room and said he could treat him, but not my very educated female friend with an MD.
19
BonamikengueApr 29, 2026
+34
I thought I saw everything when I saw a Republican rally where the candidate asked the crowd what you would do with a injured or very sick uninsured person and the crowd chanted "Let him die! Let him die! Let him die!"
This is the Republican party - and I am still ashamed that half of Americans vote for this.
34
DildoeShwagginzApr 29, 2026
+13
Can you provide a link? To be frank, I don't believe this happened. Not saying you're a liar, just think you're regurgitating something someone else told you without fact checking it.
13
dullmotionApr 29, 2026
+11
Might be an exaggeration of this video (0:43)
https://youtu.be/8T9fk7NpgIU?si=8EfjsewTQSuFU4E5
11
DoingBestWeCanApr 29, 2026
+6
Given how screwed up things are right now, I would not be surprised if this happened at a smaller rally. Think idiots with signs on a street corner.
6
DildoeShwagginzApr 29, 2026
+3
I wouldn’t be surprised either, however, things like this are a huge issue right now. The right keeps screaming fake news and unfortunately people like this guy keep proving them right… by making shit up and claiming it’s truth
3
ClanHaishaApr 29, 2026
+14
Gonna need actual proof on that.
The medical ‘death panels’ were something that riled them up against Obamacare too.
14
PM_CUTE_BUTTS_PLSApr 29, 2026
+16
You think there's any continuity or consistency in their beliefs?
16
Kennebec23Apr 29, 2026
+25
The biggest tax break in history was established in 1943 when employer sponsored health insurance was declared tax exempt.
25
RecentDecision2329Apr 29, 2026
+28
Healthcare companies need to be regulated like utilities. They are an essential service. Better yet , universal healthcare like the rest of the world
28
OddBranch132Apr 29, 2026
+40
Well yeah. How else are they going to make sure the working class doesn't rise up and fight for their right to live. They keep us tired, and desperate for jobs to barely survive, to instill fear of losing everything. Tying healthcare to employment is one of the most critical parts of making sure the poor stay poor and fight each other for resources.
40
MCBEA1130Apr 29, 2026
+19
Healthcare is broken and you just nailed it. It's the insurance companies, drug companies, and the medical facilities. It's been broken for over 30 years. Healthcare should be a basic right for all, especially in this country.
19
ArtichokeAware9849Apr 29, 2026
+10
I think that that would be called Single Payer Universal Healthcare. Vote only for congresspeople that support it. Let your voice be heard.
10
Dull_Bird3340Apr 29, 2026
+9
It was a decision made after WWII, companies could compete by offering more generous health insurance w out raising actual wages and consequently taxes. Every other developed country moved towards national healthcare. By now, everyone benefti g zealously guards the system. We couldn't even keep the free IRS filing system Biden started because of lobbying, it's going to take a lot to kill for profit healthcare
9
Quirky-Lecture-6066Apr 29, 2026
+78
You have to remember that the amount billed is often NOT the amount insurance companies pay. So a hospital says 'we are billing Cigna $4,000 for this MRI' and Cigna laughs and says 'we are paying you $800' and the hospital says '....okay.' And that is that. The numbers are all flipping meaningless.
78
Ok-Suggestion-2162Apr 29, 2026
+50
Except when you have insurance and they bill 4,000 but insurance says it isn’t covered because blah blah blah, and then the hospital says well you can no longer pay the self pay price because you had insurance. I have a bill in collections now over the. Exact scenario. 5x higher because they billed insurance, insurance denied and they wouldn’t reduce to the self pay price. Insane. Services shouldn’t change price based on the customer.
50
librarianlaceApr 29, 2026
+16
I had neurosurgery in January. My EOB showed $79k billed for the surgeon, and blue cross of Idaho paid $853. Not a typo. No commas.
The fact that my husbands work insurance is $1900/mo and he had to get a second job delivering pizzas for us to be able to “afford” surgery when the most expensive part, that mans hands, were less than a grand is infuriating.
16
lexilinkApr 29, 2026
+8
Hey so depending on your state you may qualify for Medicaid as a secondary if you're paying that much for health insurance, tho states vary. Health insurance purchased separately comes off dollar for dollar of your income, meaning if he grosses 5k a month but is paying 1900 for insurance, his monthly income will look like 3100 to Medicaid. Retroactive is also available in some states for up to 3 months before you apply. Im not sure what state your in but could very well be worth applying to try to get more coverage, signed a welfare caseworker in a red state. You'll be able to get refunded for what has already been spent out of pocket for retro months if you qualify too.
8
Stories-With-BearsApr 29, 2026
+19
This is the truth. It’s like selling a couch on Facebook marketplace. If you list it for $500, one person might offer you $450, another person wants to know if you’d sell it for $300, someone might be bold and ask if they could get it for $100 if they pick it up within an hour. But no one is gonna offer you $700.
Hospitals know insurance will negotiate them down so they overcharge to cover their bases. Nobody is actually paying full price. This is why you hear stories of people saying things like “My hospital bill was $13k but when I called their billing department they reduced it to $2k!” The billed amount was never the real charge. It’s all Monopoly money.
19
Superunknown_7Apr 29, 2026
+23
It's called the chargemaster rate, and it's basically made up numbers. But so is the "amount allowed" by insurance. All just made up nonsense with no correlation to actual costs, supplies or demand.
For example: My 2024 hospital bills totaled about $5 million. What was paid by insurance was more like $1.4 million. What do either of those numbers mean? Not a god damn thing.
23
BalgardApr 29, 2026
+4
Exactly. I love when I see my bill at a doctors office. Doctor charged $386 dollars for an appointment. Insurance rate was $56.
I always think of my insurance like a d******* card I pay way to much money for. But I bet if I was paying the cash price at the office i'd pay $40. I never tested that though
4
HammurabiWithoutEyeApr 29, 2026
+3
>I never tested that though
You could always call saying you don't have insurance and need to check self pay prices.
3
CardioSourceApr 29, 2026
+4
You’re allowed to pay the cash rate even if you have insurance. You’re not required to bill your insurance for services
4
utzutzutzproApr 29, 2026
+131
Well... might that be because hospitals are run like companies in the US?
With CEOs?
Which hospital got CEOs outside of the US?
Rest of the world doesn't run hospitals as profit centers.
131
klop2031Apr 29, 2026
+31
My fave is that ive seen hospital ceos who are lawyers and other fields and none are physicians. Crazy
31
caspruceApr 29, 2026
+12
Mayo Clinic CEO is always a doctor. Many pharma companies have doctors with MBAs as CEO.
The bigger issue is insurance.
12
[deleted]Apr 29, 2026
+80
[deleted]
80
BalgardApr 29, 2026
+15
I am always surprised that we don't have caps or something on profit for healthcare. Like pharmacies - I know they have research costs etc, but is it right that they are making, in some cases 80% profit off of sick people?
Same thing with the hospital. I love when I hear from my facility leaders that we are in the red and can't pay for overtime etc. You'd think the red meant they were actively losing money... But no its the projected profit. We thought we'd make 3 million this month, but we only made 2.5m..
Not surprised HCA was mentioned in the article. They are always trying to increase profits, its never enough. And thats the issue.
However, hospitals are in a weird place right now. With the "big beautiful bill (what a dumb f****** name)" I have seen a large increase in patients who had insurance last year but now are unfunded.
I also have seen patients with these shit ass plans that I am not even sure why they pay for it at all. One lady tells me she was so worried about getting a bill or her copay over something stupid. I asked billing if she had any copays -- she had a 6k a night copay for each hospital day. What in the actual f***.
15
[deleted]Apr 29, 2026
+11
[deleted]
11
Rickk38Apr 29, 2026
+6
> Which hospital got CEOs outside of the US?
All of them? They all have some sort of president or chief executive, they all have some sort of board of directors/regents/whatever. Do you think hospitals all over the world just run without any sort of structure, budgeting, planning, and organization?
Also, they know insurance has the money and you don’t. They’re making sure they don’t lose money on you and you get care, but someone in line won’t even pay the $300 cost or the rest of their hospital stay. So they also need to make a profit to cover the other people.
We do something similar in our office. We waive majority of our fees and basically don’t make anything for our time on a lot of patients that can’t afford it. But, if I charged everyone this, I’d be homeless.
12
pasher5620Apr 29, 2026
+9
It’s not that they are milking insurance companies, it’s that insurance fights them on every single thing that they literally can’t make money charging regular prices anymore because Insurance would then immediately ask for less. I have family that work on the business side of healthcare and hospitals work on abysmal budgets purely because insurance fucks them over at every step possible. Insurance companies are parasites that only exist to be a middle man and siphon off money from both sides.
9
hailinfromtheedgeApr 29, 2026
+9
Damn. Last MRI they charged insurance 20k and still sent me a $300 bill...
9
axonxorzApr 29, 2026
+5
> They basically admitted to milking insurance companies.
"Admitting" implies they were trying to hide it in the first place, this bullshit is legally enforced.
Hospitals are required to have one price for services, they are not allowed to have one for you and a different one for insurance. As a result, their largest-volume bloc gets to dictate policy for you.
The hospital will determine that [procedure X] costs [$Y]. The insurance company says "we will pay [80% * $Y] as a flat d*******. The hospital _knew_ the carrier was going to do this, so they inflated their cost projections by 25% so that, at the end of the day, they still make their prescribed margin. Hospital wins, insurance company wins, consumer loses.
In a few years, it will be network contract renegotiation time. The hospital and insurance company will enter the same tired dance where they crab bucket each other (and other care providers and insurers) into the list-price for a given procedure going up while actual quality of care remains as-is. Realistically, quality is more likely to degrade as the provider cuts corners to satisfy their rent-seeking landlords.
5
WellithappenedthatwyApr 29, 2026
+40
No. The insrance ucompaies and hospitals are working together against you.
40
FrogTrainerApr 29, 2026
+14
how does that make sense given what I just said?
14
avcloudyApr 29, 2026
+17
They don’t bill insurance companies 5k. They say it costs 5k and then negotiate down to 300. And then it says 5k on your bill and they calculate rates based on those costs. In a lot of situations, your excess costs more than the cost of providing treatment and more than the cost of insurance covering this treatment.
This is all based on the fiction that 5k is what it ‘really costs’ and insurance companies are getting an insane d*******. If a customer could get it for $300 then, from the insurance companies perspective they are getting railed, and on top of that, people have a financial incentive not to have insurance (because treatment is cheaper).
17
SingerSingle5682Apr 29, 2026
+9
So it’s actually a price fixing arrangement between the insurance and the hospital. The insurance company WANTS extremely high medical costs. Those costs force people to buy health insurance. The insurance company will pay it because they know the percentage of their customers that need an MRI every year vs their premiums. They profit when people have to pay $1-2K a month for insurance and don’t need an MRI.
You can get cheaper prices if you don’t use insurance because of… more price fixing. Insurance companies figured out most people are poor and invented deductibles. You can pay $300 for the MRI if you don’t use insurance because it BENEFITS the insurance company as when people don’t use the insurance and pay cash the insurance company just pockets the premium and doesn’t provide care.
You see this a lot when expensive medications taken frequently like insulin. The cost with insurance is $1,000 but the cash cost is $150. The insurance company doesn’t have to pay claims if you can’t afford the $1,000 cash for 3 months to meet your $3,000 deductible after that the insurance company would have to pay for your insulin. If they keep you paying $150 a month they never have to pay for your insulin even though you pay them $1,500 a month for your premium.
It’s all price fixing.
9
mike_b_nimbleApr 29, 2026
+43
The cash price they gave you is the actual cost. Everything billed to insurance is a negotiated cost. The negotiated costs result in fat paychecks for lots of middle-men and administrators that aren’t actually involved in any part of your care or the specific transaction for that visit. It’s all a giant, industry-wide scam that uses inflated values to cook the books so that everyone has high profits and low taxes.
ETA: The real reason they don’t want you to tell your insurance isn’t because the insurance company will want a better price, it’s so the company doesn’t find out they’re being cut out of their piece for the transaction.
43
wahoozermanApr 29, 2026
+8
Because the insurance company says "We cover 40% of people in your area and if you don't agree to give us a 90% d******* we won't include you in our network and you'll lose 40% of your customers. Also you aren't allowed to charge anyone less than you charge us." So the Hospital says "Ok well the actual procedure costs us $300 so we'll charge $3,000 for it so that insurance can get their 90% d******* and we can stay solvent."
The insurance company is fine with this because it means nothing to their costs and they get to advertise their great discounts to customers.
8
A_Bored_DeveloperApr 29, 2026
+26
The people at the front desk of healthcare providers aren't rich fatcats or anything like the narrative states. These are average people like you or me.
The frontend people will say that to try to help you out. If you do it cash then you'll generally get the "real" cost at most diagnostics places (not all). If the insurance Co is brought into the mix, they will argue down the price and cause churn, which costs money to chase down.
To remedy this, hospitals will charge higher and higher knowing that insurance cos will argue it way down. It's a pretty vicious loop.
26
Ironmunger2Apr 29, 2026
+17
Hospital spends $250 to do an MRI for you. They could take the $300 and be satisfied with that. Instead, they tell the insurance company that it costs $5000. Insurance company negotiates it down to $350, where they pay $50 and you pay $300. Insurance then tells you that an MRI costs $5000 so that’s why you should have to pay them $300 a month. In reality, you could have just paid $300 once a year but because the hospital is scamming the insurance and insurance is scamming you, you’re getting screwed for nothing
17
Gamer_GreaseApr 29, 2026
+3
Let’s say the insurance company can only make a 15-20% profit on premiums (this is the Obamacare max, but I think most run well under it).
With that cap on the margin, it follows that the best possible plan for the insurance company is to maximize the amount of money flowing through them—higher premiums AND higher payouts—in order to maximize their profits. 15% of ten billion is a lot more than 15% of three billion.
So, though they may not be colluding, exactly, both parties want absolutely everything to cost as much as possible.
3
GuvanteApr 29, 2026
+6
Insurance companies often get 90% discounts on things like that.
They want a bigger d******* no matter the base price to look better and have on many occasions asked for a price increase so their d******* is more.
EDIT: another thing people tend to miss that makes the conversation way more nuanced is the difference between line item pricing (what we as consumers see) and bulk pricing aka "total cost" (the only thing insurance/providers care about). It is most obvious with Hospital billing which typically only pays based on duration and DRG code for inpatient services in insurance contracts.
However even outpatient (aka you didn't stay in a hospital bed overnight or weren't at a hospital) can have weird discounts because of this. For example giving a deeper d******* on radiology (actually taking the image) but giving less of a d******* for examining the image. Insurance gets to show a huge d******* on the radiology but the provider gets paid from both so doesn't mind as long as the sum is enough (aka 80% d******* on image 20% d******* on doctor instead of equivalent 50% d******* on both).
6
GandhisNukeOfficerApr 29, 2026
+26
I live in Japan and had to get an MRI last year. It was around $100. I'm enrolled in the national health insurance program which costs I think $14/month?
26
Ask_IndividualApr 29, 2026
+22
Japan has an interesting system where prices for all healthcare goods and services are mandated and fixed. The mandated pricing is intended to find a balance between a reasonable profit margin and affordability. They do a pretty good job. The only exception might be travelers passing through or similar unusual cases.
22
Masterkid1230Apr 29, 2026
+3
Yeah I was gonna say. I got an endoscopy last year for like 40 dollars, there's no way an MRI is 500 under the National Health Insurance.
To be fair, I would be more than happy to pay full price for the health insurance after I get a job here because the healthcare system works so well. It's fully worth the price.
3
DrekharApr 29, 2026
+46
Depending on where you live in the US you can get an MRI for $500ish outside of using insurance. Not defending the system, but it is possible here as well. I just got routine blood work done; Quest "charged" me $895 for the simple procedure. My insurance company paid them $70, and left me with $20 to pay. None of that makes sense.
46
Override9636Apr 29, 2026
+8
Allegedly, $895 is the price is the cost of the procedure, and your insurance company out of the goodness of their hearts, negotiates that down to $90. Then they pay off the $70, leaving you with $20 to pay. So you say "wow I only have to pay $20 instead of nearly $900! Thank you insurance companies!" When realistically, a single payer system would have already controlled the price to $90 or less, and then just paid the full cost with tax money.
8
Kristin2349Apr 29, 2026
+6
I just paid 5k for an MRI for my dog! That was only for the head and neck, turned out to be a spinal issue so we need another MRI. There's no alternative when it comes to vet care at this level, very few facilities have MRIs.
6
bluejester12Apr 29, 2026
+8
When I was in Japan they only charged me $30 dollars for a dental cleaning (in 2005).
8
Masterkid1230Apr 29, 2026
+6
It's actually considerably cheaper if you're on the National Health Insurance, which is the subsidised program.
I got a dental cleaning the other day and it cost me the equivalent of 9 dollars because national insurance covered the rest for me.
6
Responsible-MeringueApr 29, 2026
+7
Mexico is the same for $150.
I can fly to cdmx, see the doc, get a scan & diag & theapy next steps in 3 days... Then take a 2 week vacation in multiple cities across the country.
And still have $2000 more in my pocket than if I'd got the american MRI with no consultation or followup care.
F*** us healthcare
7
bros402Apr 29, 2026
+3
You can get an MRI without contrast for $475 at a place near me. Add $50 for contrast.
Unless it is something where the imaging is insanely important (like cancer), just look at outpatient imaging facilities every time. They charge a tenth of what a hospital does.
3
SnukeInRSnizApr 29, 2026
+3
Last month I had a kidney stone, went to the ER, got a CT scan with contrast that took all of maybe 5 minutes for the whole process. Billed my insurance $2,800 just for that, altogether the 4 hour ER trip which included the CT scan, a few labs from a single blood draw, and a shot of toridol for the pain was billed at slightly more than $5100.
I work in healthcare, it's a f****** shit show. In my lab I'm the project lead manufacturing CAR-T for our University's in-house b-cell blood cancer trial, the commercial versions of the product I manufacture are billed at $500,000 each. Our manufacturing process is pretty much identical except I can get the whole process done in half the time, we bill around $35,000 for the same exact product.
Health insurance and the whole industry is rotten, straight to the core.
3
sudoku7Apr 29, 2026
+114
It’s part of the really ugly truth of the nature of the US healthcare system dysfunction. There are multiple factors working (unintentionally) to keep it in this dysfunctional equilibrium, and small changes are very unlikely to dislodge that equilibrium. Larger changes are needed but they’re also much harder to carry out due to the risk of the system being made worse.
114
TimmyWimmyWooWooApr 29, 2026
+123
It's not unintentional. The people profiting do their best to keep the money rolling.
123
MotherTreacle3Apr 29, 2026
+11
Who knew that applying the profit motive to every aspect of life necessary for society to function causes massive inflation of prices!?
11
[deleted]Apr 29, 2026
+9
[removed]
9
sudoku7Apr 29, 2026
+4
For sure. We have to accept risk to make this mess better. Denying it just means we have to incur greater risk later to address it. But it is the political why things become difficult.
4
Fruit_FaceApr 29, 2026
+8
This is why I get so annoyed when there's a big deal made of little tweaks, some random drug gets a price cut, or there's some big todo about some improvement on some vagary of the system.
It's good there are small improvements but a lot of energy is expended on what amounts to nothing in the grand scheme.
Instead, we should be focusing on how the system as a whole needs a massive overhaul, but no one wants to actually kick it off.
8
TN_Jed13Apr 29, 2026
+7
My mom manages records at a state hospital. Legally, they have to treat uninsured patients that the private hospitals turn away. Then they have to battle insurance companies for the care they do provide. The system is definitely flawed.
7
retoricalprophylaxisApr 29, 2026
+17
To be fair, when you have for profit medical care, you end up with administrative bloat to pay executives to make business decisions that ensure you have the nicest atrium of any hospital around, advertise services, audit how much a single Tylenol should cost at various areas of the hospital, calculate exactly how few doctors and nurses they can staff before there is a strike, slowdown, or walkout, calculate how to outsource facilities maintenance so that they aren't the one criminally underpaying the janitors at their facilities, and calculate how much money you can charge 4th year medical students to do free work for you.
17
0bsessions324Apr 29, 2026
+10
I didn't watch the whole thing, but this dude was a f*** awful choice to represent his hospital system.
I've worked in both the insurance end and the hospital system end of the healthcare industry and there are actual, legitimate reasons facilities charge more than private practice, but this dude seemed wildly unprepared to explain that.
The answer should have been a basic: "because running a facility is more expensive than a private practice; how many private practices do you know of that have to keep the lights on in an ER, ICU, and multiple inpatient wards 24/7/365?"
10
originalrocketApr 29, 2026
+63
I did medical billing in the mid 2010s. G-code king! F*** yeah we billed the max, be cause the government said nope, here is almost nothing, bill those private insurances to make up the difference.
Pay your nurses, support staff more! How??? I was making $15 an hour with an associates degree and couple billing certificates. AND quarterly mandatory trainings that mostly didn't apply to me but I "needed" to be certified in it because government said so.
63
originalrocketApr 29, 2026
+37
Add on the cost of medical waist. Half those meetings we would do inventory and throw out expired products. GAUZE has an expiration date! Sealed in plastic! and its not years, its months. Yup, you read that right.
37
jspurlin03Apr 29, 2026
+43
From a manufacturing standpoint, a lot of times the expiration dates are based on the longevity of the packaging — for bottled water, say - the _water_ is fine, the bottle may not stay sufficiently sealed forever as it was manufactured. (It should be good longer than they suggest, and clearly polyethylene bottles themselves last… a long, long time)
Maybe with the gauze it’s the integrity of the seal between the top and the pouch body? Not sure. Or the guarantee of sterility may be based on how the gauze is sealed up.
43
ErosunApr 29, 2026
+7
Would liability be also part of why everything got an expiration date?
Know grocery stores throw away a ton of food because of this.
7
neonam11Apr 29, 2026
+14
WSJ had an article on some of the reasons US has such high medical costs compared to the rest of the world: high medication prices, US pays their healthcare workers from physicians, nurses, pharmacists, technicians way way more than the rest world, US healthcare institutions tend to have more middle management bureaucracy which adds an additional layer of cost.
14
ringed_city_117Apr 29, 2026
+27
We pay them way more than the rest of the world (as we should- healthcare workers are frankly underpaid in many other nations), but only around 8-9% of costs are going towards docs. Far more are going towards hospital admin and middle management positions who often provide nothing beneficial towards patient care.
27
HrhEverythingElseApr 29, 2026
+23
Hospital administration and management — the people in the offices that are far removed from the hospital smells and experiences and never have to see a patient as a human, are the ones who are absurdly overpaid. These people who keep the hospital running as a profitable *business* and slash hands on *service* are rarely even mentioned in these conversations, but draw massive paychecks that make nurses look like unpaid interns. They are the ones sitting in their C-suite ivory towers making millions of dollars and slinging shit all over the boots on the ground workers *and* patients in order to maximize their own personal profit, and would also be nearly eradicated with proper government run healthcare reform
23
NYCinPGHApr 29, 2026
+11
Similar to how higher education costs have skyrocketed over the past 40 years. Full professors still get paid well, but anyone below tenure level gets paid less after inflation than they did decades ago, and adjunct professors, who usually have at least a Masters degree, some with PhD’s, get paid little more than minimum wage, or whatever retail clerks get.
But the administrative side has increased exponentially in size, and has had pay increases far higher than inflation rate, even though they don’t have the same levels of degrees or experience, and theoretically it’s a lot easier with computers than it was with actual paper records.
I saw last week that the specific sector that has had the highest price increase is academic - usually meaning college - textbooks, which have gone up 951%, in the same time frame where medical costs have gone up 652%, and over all inflation 258%.
11
HrhEverythingElseApr 29, 2026
+3
I have actually worked as an adjunct professor and was paid less than minimum wage once the math was done
3
Gamer_GreaseApr 29, 2026
+6
Most hospital admins are just grunts paid a lot less than nurses or doctors. It’s a small number that are high-earning executives. Every hospital needs a TON of pencil-pushers making mediocre salaries to handle insurance and government agency paperwork.
6
Litz-a-maniaApr 29, 2026
+3
I see them posting on LinkedIn all the time!
3
d0ctorzaiusApr 29, 2026
+8
lol "below the cost of providing care". YOU set the cost of providing care!
8
GoragnakApr 29, 2026
+10
The cost of providing care is overhead, so building, salaries, materials, ect. It's why a lot of private practices don't take Medicare/Medicaid, or only take a small percentag of them.
For instance my uncle is a dentist and in my state Medicaid dental covers so little that on doing a filling the reimbursement barely covers the cost of materials, and overall my uncle loses money on every Medicaid he sees.
10
SiliconDiverApr 29, 2026
+7
> health insurance corrupted cost
I want to call out a few things hear that’s going to sound a bit “aktually!” But I think it’s important to note
1) insurance models/companies absolutely drive up costs. But they are likely only to be accountable for say 15-20% of the cost delta over other developed nations. The strongest US counter example to this is Kaiser, running a vertically integrated model to streamline this process. While they provide better outcomes in general, they aren’t massively undercutting on price or taking over the world.
2) this “we are losing money to Medicare” is an actual half truth. They are losing money relative to what they charge for the service. Large hospitals (not the insurance cos) set up the pricing such that: private insurances are charged something like 2x, Medicare are charged 1x, Medicaid is charged 0.8x etc. so yes. They “lose money” on Medicare and Medicaid. But the actual true costs of these services aren’t generally “X” it’s like 0.5x so on paper it looks like they lose money and Medicare/medicaid is unsustainable, but in reality it’s just structurally priced to appear that way
3) the whole issue is that hospitals are against pricing regulations and pricing fixes, where lies probably 60% or so of the US cost increases and diff compared to developed nations. Biting the bait of “we can’t afford it” or “it’s the insurance companies” or “greedy” is actually ignoring where most of the costs are coming from and quite effectively so.
Remember the pejorative of “socialized medicine” was coined by the AMA itself to intentionally obfuscate and confuse the American people way back in the 40s in opposition to Truman’s effective “Medicare for all” solution that introduced pricing structures hospitals couldn’t control.
7
israeljeffApr 29, 2026
+5
I think for your third point, hospitals resisting price fixes and the like would fall under the "greed" umbrella.
5
BicentenialDudeApr 29, 2026
+3
Meanwhile, my out of pocket expenses in EU is about the same amount as my co-pay in the Us for the same doctor’s visit.
3
frostyflakes1Apr 29, 2026
+534
Hospitals and insurance companies have been doing this dance for a while: hospitals bill outrageous prices because insurance companies will only cover part of the bill; insurance companies will only cover part of the bill because the hospitals are charging outrageous prices. Then they can point the finger at the other one and blame them for hospital pricing being what it is.
They are both to blame. This is how they have built the American healthcare system. Neither one of them is innocent. The patients ultimately suffer as a result of this broken system.
534
unimeg07Apr 29, 2026
+76
You forgot the consultants. The consultants charge exorbitant prices to the hospitals to tell them how to get the most money out of insurance companies. Then the consultants charge exorbitant prices to govt/insurance companies to advise them how to spend less money on care. The resulting mess is an extraordinarily complicated and expensive system where the middle people make massive profits. Companies like Deloitte, McKinsey, and PWC make billions playing both sides of the aisle and they are never held accountable for their role in the results.
76
ummmno_Apr 29, 2026
+7
And insurance and hospitals are also heavily skewed towards profits. How do we suck as much money out of this so everyone gets their fat check? It’s a siphon by design with doctors, nurses and patients at the center of it. Lunacy.
7
UnluckyAssist9416Apr 29, 2026
+35
I would argue neither is to blame. Corporations sole reason for existing is to maximize profits. That is exactly what they are doing. The fact is, there should be no for profit healthcare. This is a failure of our politicians who would rather sell us out then make a state run healthcare system like most of the rest of the western world.
35
dabutterflyeffectApr 29, 2026
+14
The thing about corporations is they’re made up of people making decisions. They lobby politicians to the tune of billions each year to prevent the system from being changed in Washington. They implement AI review systems to automatically reject every claim. It’s not any 1 persons fault, but healthcare executives and lobbyists do have blood on their hands.
It’s like saying it’s not nestle’s fault they use slave labor for chocolate, they’re just maximizing profits!
14
moreliketenApr 29, 2026
+25
I think the corporations deserve blame because they choose to use profits to lobby for preserving the status quo.
25
DistanceRelevant3899Apr 29, 2026
+152
I got a 800.00 bill recently for f****** bloodwork. That’s insane. Then another 1500.00 bill due to a trip to the ER for chest pain that turned out to be nothing. And things after insurance. I’m at a point where I will just ignore symptoms and hope for the best. Our healthcare system is utterly broken.
152
vasta2Apr 29, 2026
+67
Quest billed my insurance $1,172 for lab work and my insurance paid them $90...I don't understand why I can't just walk into a lab and order a battery of tests and pay them $90, why does insurance even need to be involved?
You can order some labwork directly from Quest or Labcorp. Life pro tip there, just make sure you're actually getting tested what needs to be tested. Not everything can be ordered over the counter.
5
DistanceRelevant3899Apr 29, 2026
+3
Quest is who has been billing me as well.
3
A_Refill_of_Mr_PibbApr 29, 2026
+8
It’s getting so absurd that you’re better off financially just letting nature take its course, otherwise we face debt, destitution and we die anyway.
8
Yogg_Sothoth_ArbysApr 29, 2026
+5
I was charged $850 for a 3 minute outpatient dermatology appointment to freeze something that turned out to be nothing, lol. Murica
5
cjopApr 29, 2026
+458
Republicans complaining about healthcare costs. Must be election time.
458
t-milleApr 29, 2026
+139
"Healthcare is too expensive. NO don't lower healthcare costs, that's COMMUNISM!!"
139
barbarianinalibraryApr 29, 2026
+45
Healthcare companies used to be required by law to be nonprofit organizations... Guess which party got rid of that requirement???
45
Pour_Me_Another_Apr 29, 2026
+12
The one that pretends to be pro-life I'm guessing.
12
snorlzApr 30, 2026
+8
article talks about Dems saying this is just to distract from Republicans cutting Medicaid
8
coffee_apeApr 29, 2026
+28
Tax the Epstein class, give the people healthcare and let us f****** LIVE!
28
AhBee1Apr 29, 2026
+310
Tax billionaires, give us Healthcare.
310
RannashaApr 29, 2026
+128
Not that it isn't a good idea regardless, but you don't even have to tax billionaires. The US spends more on healthcare per capita than any other country in the world. And it's not close. You could easily have good universal healthcare without spending more. You might even save some money (to be used on tax breaks for billionaires, of course).
It's not about the amount of money, it's how it's spent.
128
Gamer_GreaseApr 29, 2026
+59
Yup. Medicare for All just makes structural and financial sense. It would greatly reduce overall healthcare costs.
59
ericmm76Apr 29, 2026
+13
Outlaw health insurance, just pay doctors and specialists out of the government, and implement medical taxes in a progressive way. Fantastic.
Too bad BCBS lobbies so hard.
13
Gamer_GreaseApr 29, 2026
+9
We should keep private insurance, though IMO mostly to cover controversial healthcare that the voting public won’t completely support.
9
AhBee1Apr 29, 2026
+10
Like healthcare for women.
10
echolalia_Apr 30, 2026
+22
As a doctor, all hospital ceos are f****** trash
22
JonnyBravoIIApr 29, 2026
+124
This is political theater. Republicans have done everything in their power to make sure that costs aren't meaningfully regulated. With large legislation like Obamacare, it was typical to tweak the law every few years. Most of you are too young to remember, but committees used to hold hearings and do markups on bills to bring about needed improvements. Republicans killed that off under Obama and so instead of trying to bring needed changes to Obamacare, their only goal now is to kill it because it doesn't work as well, and they've made sure that it doesn't work.
124
Robert72051Apr 30, 2026
+14
***America doesn't have a healthcare system, it has a healthcare market.*** Healthcare is not "free". In fact, nothing is "free". However, in every society there are things that are so expensive that they are simply beyond an individual's ability to pay for them. Things like roads, schools, etc. ***Healthcare is no different. It is NOT insurance.*** Insurance exists to protect individuals from very unlikely events such as a tornado destroying your house. Healthcare is something that every living person will need during their life. ***Healthcare "insurance" companies produce absolutely nothing, all they do is take a cut which increases the cost dramatically.*** When speaking about this I often ask "Do you like your neighbor?" The answer is almost 100% of the time, "Yes, Joe's a great guy." I then ask, "Would you want to se him go broke or worse because he got sick?" The answer is always a resounding "No". At the end of the day, that is all there is to it. So, as a society do we treat healthcare the same way we do water systems or police departments or do we persist in the current folly that is the American healthcare system ...
14
GMPnerd213Apr 29, 2026
+72
When I worked in a hospital p*******, and this was a very long time ago before PBMs destroyed pharmacies, we billed 4.6x cost of drugs. So if we paid a dollar the cost billed to the patients insurance was $4.60.
The average reimbursement was 1.03x cost.
That didn’t account for all the denials and extremely expensive meds where reimbursement was actually lower than costs so you had to eat it.
Thankfully programs like 304b came out and big distributors would lower costs on meds when you reached certain thresholds to make up for it.
Needless to say managing a $100 million inventory at a 900+ bed facility was extremely stressful when patient care staff didn’t give a f*** where they were taking meds from or leaving them, when they can just call down to a p******* and order more at the expense of the hospital when all their inpatient floors actually lost money (surgery made bank though).
Don’t let insurance companies gaslight you into thinking Pharmacies and manufacturers (well at least the small manufacturers and generic manufacturers) are bad guys when private insurance built the system that led to insane costs to patients so they could save a buck on the backend and then deny you care because they think it’s too expensive or not needed
72
Gamer_GreaseApr 29, 2026
+13
The truth is that everyone in the healthcare system will have to take a haircut if we are ever going to fix the system as a whole. Insurers are a really inefficient way of paying for healthcare, and have bad incentives, but the problem is that providers are also structured badly, waste too much money, and have bad incentives. And they and insurers feed off each other.
13
AStrangerWCandyApr 29, 2026
+6
This is really the crux of the issue IMO. Every charge is negotiated like haggling at a flea market AND payors can just say no at which point the medical facility eats a loss and has to compensate elsewhere. Medical care needs actual fixed pricing and payors can only deny paying for cause.
6
gjboomerApr 29, 2026
+7
Some campaign ads here in MN are saying how bad 304b is and it’s a waste. From what I see it’s saved money for us and patients.
7
revoskulaApr 29, 2026
+11
Yeah because nothing says "healing" like surprise billing for the penthouse suite
11
WargrothApr 29, 2026
+12
The only crime here is for profit healthcare being accepted as a thing
12
Legitimate_Egg_2073Apr 29, 2026
+9
It’s hard to know what’s real at this point. Every three weeks I get an injection for an oncology treatment/immunotherapy treatment and when I see the EOB paperwork showing that the cost of this medicine is @ 56K, my mind wobbles. Them all the math showing the adjustments and so on, then below that, my co-pay/deductible, “what you owe”. It’s just May and I’ve already nearly maxed out on my maximum out of pocket. So that’s good I guess. 🥲
9
Warm_Storm9770Apr 29, 2026
+8
Ooof. I'm 34. Had Hodgkin's lymphoma when I was 18, very luckily under my parents insurance. I "survived!"... And now I have a tumor in my brain and multiple "side effect" conditions. Raised 50,000$ via go fund me to find out what's going on and can't/don't want to pay to be poked and prodded for my remaining time. Or go through chemo again. Got given a vague timeline til it kills me. My only advice... Hold onto every smile, every shred of laughter, and do the best you can to help others smile. Bad days are bad. Good days are good.
8
9BluApr 29, 2026
+3
Cancer is crazy expensive. I have an app I wrote to track my medical info and it scrapes the EOBs from my provider website and provides stats and breakdowns. Since late 2024 when I was diagnosed, the total billings are over $500K and that's 99% cancer related charges. I knew it would be expensive when they told me about the free, 24 hour clinic for their cancer patients. Anytime they are offering free care you know they are making it up and way more elsewhere.
And yea, I blew through my out of pocket in 30 days in 2024 and within the first 45 days in 2025 while I was still on chemo.
3
AlgonuevoCRApr 29, 2026
+28
I can attest things are insane. $36,000 for what? Back in the US after working abroad in a country with socialized medicine. My 16 hour visit to hospital, because the HMO nurse told me to go to ER as urgent care was not enough, for a heart concern. I received basic intake, last on the list triage, because I was stable with observation, a Tylenol, portable EKG and ultrasound, 6 standard blood tests, and a standard non cc room over night for the timed blood draws. No food, no water just in case I would need a procedure. Was a heat stress flutter in my heart. No worries. $36,000.00. $10,600 is my out of pocket for the year. Met in one visit. $36,000 ....we know how the CEO and execs get paid tens of millions per year. It's predatory.
28
DopamineSavantApr 29, 2026
+21
All of these people should be banished from the country.
21
Tree_SureApr 29, 2026
+9
They should lose their careers and be left on the streets. That way they will learn what’s it like to not being able to afford anything.
9
Annual-Reason2970Apr 29, 2026
+8
you still have to treat everyone. many bills never get paid due to cost of healthcare with insurance companies taking their cut too (even more now that they killed the ama ).. medicare for all would drastically reduce cost of healthcare across the board
8
jstitely1Apr 30, 2026
+9
Hospitals shouldn’t have CEOs because health care shouldn’t be a freaking for profit enterprise
9
wingspanttApr 29, 2026
+38
The problem is our broken insurance system. Hospitals know patients aren't the payers and they can bill almost anything they want to insurance at crazy prices. Since many patients don't actually pay directly, providers are free to charge whatever they want, f****** over the people who won't have insurance.
38
pottymouthboyApr 29, 2026
+18
That is not really how the system works. Hospitals and insurance companies have billing contracts, agreed upon before services are provided. That is a “ in network provider agreement “. Hospitals also are “ out of network “ providers for other insurance providers. These they need to bill at higher rate than in network.
18
Gamer_GreaseApr 29, 2026
+6
Hospitals are also the problem, because they are permitted to outright scam people into paying vastly inflated prices to make up for all their “losses” elsewhere.
6
bullmoooooseApr 29, 2026
+11
This is the thing that people who are against universal healthcare don't get. Folks who can't afford care already get it in a lot of cases (not great care, and that can actually drive up the cost since they put off doing anything till they just go to the ER) they just don't pay. Thus the costs get absorbed to the system and get passed along to the folks who DO pay, just in a much less efficient manner than doing the same kind of redistribution through taxes and funding a universal government system.
Your ER visit with private insurance that you still have to pay $5000 for covers the cost of every uninsured or poorer person who is seen and just won't be billed or won't pay the bill that the hospital still has to see.
11
Gamer_GreaseApr 29, 2026
+6
Correct. More than half the country is on welfare for healthcare coverage or uninsured. All of those people are completely immune to these huge bills and medical debt that everyone complains about.
It is solely those privately insured through employers or through the marketplaces that are actually receiving and paying these bills. It’s not sustainable. That number of privately insured WILL shrink.
6
OlpeachesApr 29, 2026
+12
Look you pleebs the second yatch is not buying itself.
12
Banana-phone15Apr 29, 2026
+5
Problem is health insurance and hospital. All insurance companies need to be dissolved. And replaced by universal healthcare care. This is will give government a bargaining power and also allow them to fix overpriced medications that pharmaceutical companies charges and also overcharge bills that hospital companies charge.
5
Ambitious_Egg9713Apr 29, 2026
+4
And with Big Beautiful Bill further cutting reimbursement and smaller hospitals closing, expect these prices to go even higher.
4
PercivalSweetwaduhApr 29, 2026
+7
Yeah, just wait until you find out a big local hospital owns several small rural hospitals. The big hospital gets to double-bill for same treatment given at a big hospital. So, grandpa has some heart issues and is transported to the local small-town hospital. Then the small town hospital transfers grandpa to the big hospital. Same treatment (might vary given the severity of heart issues), but the big hospital gets two bills sent to the insurance company. Double dipping.
7
danicaredditApr 29, 2026
+5
Republican politicians are asking why healthcare is so expensive 😂😂😂
5
tohuvohu-lightApr 29, 2026
+6
Yeah and the Tobacco guys said nicotine was not addictive. Liars.
6
arigironiApr 29, 2026
+4
Yeah because nothing says "healing" like surprise billing for the fancy waiting room
4
PumperNikel0Apr 30, 2026
+6
Why do hospitals even need a CEO? Unnecessary.
6
N3M3S1S75Apr 30, 2026
+5
Universal healthcare would help solve this problem but Americans have bigger things to spend their taxes on like pointless wars and a ballroom that was apparently already paid for already by donors
5
ValuableSoggy5305Apr 30, 2026
+5
Once again, it must be pointed out that hospitals should not *have* CEOs
5
Happy_MaintenanceApr 29, 2026
+11
Hospital administration staff have no idea about healthcare. They’re frequently mba graduates.
11
Several-Opposite-746Apr 29, 2026
+9
This is the natural result of unbridled capitalism and business practices. Decisions are made to leverage as much influence as possible to squeeze out every last dollar of profits, regardless of fairness or morals. Shareholders demand their CEOs obtain maximum profits and if they don't deliver, they'll find another CEO who will.
9
NeoLephtyApr 29, 2026
+8
Friendly reminder that in the US, health insurance was always intended to offer lower care for higher prices. You can see Nixon talk about it in the secretly recorded Nixon tapes when he discusses HMO's. Once he was told the "incentives are aligned the right way" (re: towards more profit and less care) he immediately endorsed HMO's in the country.
Health insurance in the US is a scam that makes the entire healthcare industry worse.
8
South_Accountant_233Apr 29, 2026
+3
Real thieves, all the time. Pretty much everyone in administration is rotten. You are a number.
3
Banana-phone15Apr 29, 2026
+6
Don’t listen to CEOs their companies make way more than enough profit. When they say they need to charge patients more, they are talking about charging extra to fill their personal pockets.
How come hospital and pharmaceutical companies are funded by US taxpayers? When their products and services are ready, they overcharge US taxpayer, but the same medicine is sold to citizens of other countries for so much cheaper. Price different is like Trump says 400% 600% 1000% 2000%
There’s a reason why we will never have universal healthcare in America. Because the only solutions that are even considered are ones where everyone currently being paid, continues to get paid after the fact.
Since universal healthcare would essentially mean the death of an entire industry and thousands of shareholders losing out on billions a year. We will never see a solution that meaningfully improves healthcare or costs for everyone in America.
In fact it will only get worse and worse until it’s cheaper for even the most impoverished of us to simply go to another country to healthcare.
3
prodigaldummyApr 29, 2026
+2
I didn’t get into the saving lives business to save lives!
2
Abystract-ismApr 29, 2026
+5
Hey, can we charge hospital CEOs more at our businesses?
5
Suitable-Rate652Apr 30, 2026
+4
Here are the salaries of the CEOs with sources. Pls excuse if I posted twice.
1. HCA Healthcare — Sam Hazen, CEO
Total Compensation (2024): $23,799,137
Total compensation for fiscal year ending in 2024: $23,799,137. HCA Healthcare disclosed its CEO pay was 391 times its median employee's pay.
Source: AFL-CIO PayWatch / SEC Filing AFL-CIO
2. CommonSpirit Health — Wright Lassiter III, President & CEO
Compensation: Not yet publicly available for the most recent year
CommonSpirit is a nonprofit and discloses executive pay through IRS Form 990 filings, which are released on a delay. The most recent detailed figures available are from fiscal year 2023. His current compensation has not been published in the sources found.
Source: IRS Form 990 / ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
3. New York-Presbyterian — Dr. Brian Donley, President & CEO
2024 Compensation (as EVP/COO, before becoming CEO): ~$5.4 million
New CEO Brian Donley made $5.4 million in salary, benefits and perks in 2024. He became President & CEO in January 2026, succeeding Steven Corwin, who earned $26,271,976 in total compensation in 2024.
Source: NYC Central Labor Council / The Mirror US New York City Central Labor CouncilNewsBreak
4. ECU Health — Dr. Michael Waldrum, CEO
Total Compensation (2024): ~$1.7 million
ECU Health CEO Michael Waldrum took home about $1.7 million in 2024.
Source: The Charlotte Post
4
tradenpaintApr 30, 2026
+4
Our staffing has went from 3200 to 2000 in 4 years! They’re are making a killin’
Make a govt insurance plan ran by competent doctors at a competitive rate and you’d probably kill a lot of the bs in the system overnight.
I would gamble that there are few doctors that want to charge patients outlandish fees. Look into how insurance denies claims, change treatment plans(even when ineffective), and low ball procedures.
Guess who also has the most money to lobby and continue to make the system worse….
3
Tricky-Ad7897Apr 29, 2026
+3
If I speak I am in big trouble
3
Not_Legal_Advice_PodApr 29, 2026
+3
Make doctors salaries employees of the federal government. At 300k a year, 8 hours a day, r weeks vacation, one full hour of doctor time would cost the government 170 dollars. A five hour surgery involving two doctors would cost 1,700 bucks.
Then keep paying them that rate when they want to retire and teach medical school, where tuition is free because the teachers are government employees and the classes are held in empty aircraft hangers on military bases.
This would be a far far better system than what we currently have.
3
TALKTOME0701Apr 29, 2026
+3
When the people who are refusing to fund healthcare because they're so "fiscally responsible" while hospitals still have to care for emergent patients and perform surgery and maintain a facility and all the life saving equipment and employees or throw them on the streets happily fund a billion dollar war without any inquiry. Sickening
3
SummerAndTinklesBFFApr 29, 2026
+3
I just had to pay $150 on top of the $350 the hospital charged my insurance for a ct scan of my kidneys that took 20 seconds and probably gave me cancer
👍
3
BoobsnbuttApr 29, 2026
+3
That's interesting, what's his name and address?
3
BlueOceanGalApr 29, 2026
+3
I am due money back from a surgical center who estimated my amount pre-surgery and then by the time their claim was processed, I'd already met my out-of-pocket max and my deductible and my coinsurance and my copay. 🙄
I've been waiting 6 months for my money to be refunded and they're not even responding anymore. I've written my senator about this and have received zero response. These people are predators and thieves. Do not ever pay anybody ahead of time for anything.
3
Ithaqua-YiggApr 29, 2026
+3
The insurance industry is bilking us both ways. Huge co-pays $500-$650 for a needed MRI w/contrast and they charge double that to the gov for Medicaid/care patients .
3
McRibs2024Apr 29, 2026
+3
Let’s all agree this is bullshit. Until we have a better insurance system this will continue. I think it’s going to get worse before it gets better. Gotta imagine that as more people are just one tragedy away from healthcare related financial stress- people get onboard with universal healthcare. I hope I’m right.
3
Suitable-Rate652Apr 30, 2026
+3
Here are the CEOs salaries with sources noted:
1. HCA Healthcare — Sam Hazen, CEO
Total Compensation (2024): $23,799,137
Total compensation for fiscal year ending in 2024: $23,799,137. HCA Healthcare disclosed its CEO pay was 391 times its median employee's pay.
Source: AFL-CIO PayWatch / SEC Filing AFL-CIO
2. CommonSpirit Health — Wright Lassiter III, President & CEO
Compensation: Not yet publicly available for the most recent year
CommonSpirit is a nonprofit and discloses executive pay through IRS Form 990 filings, which are released on a delay. The most recent detailed figures available are from fiscal year 2023. His current compensation has not been published in the sources found.
Source: IRS Form 990 / ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
3. New York-Presbyterian — Dr. Brian Donley, President & CEO
2024 Compensation (as EVP/COO, before becoming CEO): ~$5.4 million
New CEO Brian Donley made $5.4 million in salary, benefits and perks in 2024. He became President & CEO in January 2026, succeeding Steven Corwin, who earned $26,271,976 in total compensation in 2024.
Source: NYC Central Labor Council / The Mirror US New York City Central Labor CouncilNewsBreak
4. ECU Health — Dr. Michael Waldrum, CEO
Total Compensation (2024): ~$1.7 million
ECU Health CEO Michael Waldrum took home about $1.7 million in 2024.
Source: The Charlotte Post
3
Life-Sun-Apr 30, 2026
+3
F*** those monsters. Healthcare in the US is trash and untenable expensive. Too many people have their finger in the honey pot.
3
Whole_Pain_7432Apr 30, 2026
+3
Its a mafioso "protection" racket
3
beardingmesoftlyApr 29, 2026
+7
The term "Hospital CEO" says everything, doesn't it?
7
FlexFanaticApr 29, 2026
+5
My favorite is that some hospitals I have been to to visit someone charged a expensive parking fee.
5
MalleableBee1Apr 29, 2026
+4
> The hospital CEOs pushed back, saying the higher fees are because hospitals are often reimbursed below the cost of providing the care, particularly by government programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
This is a BIG LIE.
If you're interested, pull up the financial statements of your local non-profit Healthcare district and look what the two biggest revenue items are. The issue is private insurance.
4
MueltimeApr 29, 2026
+2
Is that Jason “Puppy Mill” Smith? I can hear his helium pitched voice now.
2
CaymonkiApr 29, 2026
+2
Same people who would fight being taxed more by lobbying our elected officials. Raising prices because they can’t take a hit to profits over people.
2
boatloadoffunkApr 29, 2026
+2
My friend works in hospital billing compliance for a huge regional healthcare provider. She has some concerning stories about doctors getting in heated arguments with the insurance companies over medical procedures. Imagine a 28 year old MBA trying to tell a 50 year old surgeon how to do their job.
2
SooowasthinkingApr 29, 2026
+2
Well no shit these are f****** multimillionaires. All the love they have is not for their fellow human beings it is for money above all else.
To put this in perspective ask yourself a question: Do multi millionaires or even wealthier have health insurance like we do?
Answer:Of course not they can pay whatever and more than likely will never set foot inside an ER nor ever get charged so much between ambulance and the stay it could break them in half.
2
OilpaintchaApr 29, 2026
+2
This is your reminder that US citizens pay 2-3 times more than their European counterparts for medical care and we are getting progressively poorer outcomes.
2
Morrans_GazeApr 29, 2026
+2
This highlights that it's not really insurance companies versus patients but closer to insurance companies versus hospitals that drives cost. In a fee for service system, one need to max the amount one has to do and the other has to try to restrict has much, especially if both are public entities beholdened to shareholders.
2
dangubitiApr 29, 2026
+2
Our healthcare system is pretty fundamentally broken and consists of a couple players who are all trying to get the most money from each other driving up costs. Providers want to upcharge insurance as much as possible to get the most money. Insurance wants to deny as much as possible to save money, and it also fractured with a ton of administrative waste. Physicians are a bit of a cartel in terms of keeping the overall physician supply low (can’t bring over foreign doctors easily and limits in med school capacity), which drives up labor costs. Costs keep spiraling because all of these elements keep putting pressure on each other to raise costs. Really couldn’t design a worse system if you tried.
2
Frankthestank2220Apr 29, 2026
+2
You could literally gut 80% off all administrative duties in the hospital and it would run fine.
2
PostsnobillsApr 29, 2026
+2
Fellas... Either we figure this out or things will get ugly.
And not for the poor and desperate, they're already rock bottom.
2
cpatrocksApr 29, 2026
+2
For profit healthcare is the enemy.
2
agawl81Apr 29, 2026
+2
When a hospital partnered with my gyno, they talked her into moving her office into the hospital building across the street. My pap visits went from a copay that was less than $100 to over $600. For the same exam. I'd had a cancer in situ removed and had to have frequent screenings for a while to make sure they got it all and I was very tempted to blow them off. I'm fine nothing abnormal ever showed up and I was able to go back to less frequent screenings. But there are people who couldn't have just absorbed the additional cost.
2
Boomslang505Apr 29, 2026
+2
It is really important that they have private jets. How else can they maintain that standard of living?
194 Comments