Serious question for those more educated than I am.
I didn’t think this was an official war because nothing was passed through congress. Why was that a thing for like 2 days and all of a sudden it’s just “ok yeah the guy didn’t follow process, but we’re in a war no biggie”.
191
SpiderSlitScrotumsMar 28, 2026
+127
There are no checks and balances to stop him. The military doesn’t answer directly to Congress. And Presidents have been acting on their own for so long that there is no one to stop it.
You might ask, doesn’t the Constitution say that only Congress can declare war? Sure, but Presidents have held that they have the right to start hostilities due to their Commander-In-Chief duties.
You might ask, what about the War Powers Resolution? Congress has passed the War Powers Resolution that gives the President the power to act without consenting Congress under certain circumstances (which have been broadly interpreted). Presidents have held that this is unconstitutional (it hasn’t been adjudicated yet), and that even if it were constitutional, it doesn’t apply to air strikes. Additionally, Congress did not have the votes to invoke the cessation of hostilities provision.
The next item that comes up is the 60 day provision in the War Powers Resolution. But again, there are legal arguments against it that I discussed above. In addition to that, the Supreme Court often rules that certain provisions in the Constitution are nonjusticiable political questions (that the President and Congress have to solve the problem, not the courts). I imagine they would go the same way here (Ex: Smith v Obama (2016)).
127
DotDash13Mar 28, 2026
+20
It is certainly a political question that the Supreme Court wouldn't touch. The balance to the President being Commander of the Armed Forces is that Congress controls funding or they can impeach the President. That's pretty much it.
20
markusthemarxistMar 28, 2026
+30
because the War Powers Act allows Presidents to do this for 60 days without congressional approval
30
catchy_phrase76Mar 28, 2026
+5
And Congress ain't doing shit to stop it and Iran taking tolls when ships could pass through the strait without touching Iranian waters will make it so we can't stop.
Relaxing Army standards is just the writing in the wall.
5
coolcoolcool485Mar 28, 2026
+17
the constitution is not self-enforcing
17
Coozey_7Mar 28, 2026
+31
Because the precedent was set 80 years ago.
Congress didn't step in when Truman went into Korea, they didn't step in when Kennedy and Johnson went into Vietnam, they didn't step in during any of the Cold War conflicts that involved US troops, they didn't step in the Gulf War, or Iraq 2.0, or the Global War on Terror.
The US congress has willingly given up their constitutional role to declare war to the President.
So for pretty much the entire lives of every American except for the very elderly, the president has been the sole decider on whether the US goes to war or not.
Right or wrong its the status quo at this point
31
arathorn3Mar 28, 2026
+6
We technically have not been in a war since world war 2.
Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iraq again
None of them have been declared wars by congress.
6
Superest22Mar 28, 2026
+16
Pretty sure (I’m not a yank) that the President can, as commander in chief, essentially have the country at war for 60 days (with possibility to extend to 90) before Congressional support is absolutely required.
Think he has to argue some sort of ‘self defence’ element which is covered by the BS regarding nuclear capability.
Noting Republicans have majority it hasn’t been voted down. Midterms (hopefully!) things might change.
A lot of damage can be done before then though.
16
BonerballsMar 28, 2026
+9
I can see him waiting the 60 days and then congress votes against declaring war and Trump uses that as his "out".
"I didn't want to run, but our cowardly Congress, one of the worst congresses in the world, ran away"
9
PiousLiarMar 28, 2026
+7
At this point, it’s probably going to take the masses seeing a US soldier’s face freeze framed in a suicide drone’s video before they’re shaken awake to demanding anything… either it’ll get pushed off as being “Iranian slopaganda” or we see actual movement.
It’s a grim position to be in
7
protomenaceMar 28, 2026
+1
Republicans control Congress and they are supporting the war. If Congress really wanted to, they could cut off the monetary spigot that fuels the war, but they don't want to because they are on board.
1
Brew_WallaceMar 28, 2026
+1
Because the GOP-controlled Congress let him do whatever he wants with no accountability
1
darruteMar 28, 2026
-5
Because war has bipartisan support. The opposition could make a stink about it, but they like the current state of things because it allows them to get the war they want and then complain about it at election time.
To clarify, it has bipartisan support among politicians. It has bipartisan opposition among the public.
-5
joegettoMar 28, 2026
+12
What are you even talking about?
12
-CassaNova-Mar 28, 2026
+1
Please, for the love of God, learn how your government works
1
ConsciousSkyyMar 28, 2026
+10
Lol tell me you don’t live in the US without telling me you don’t live in the US. Trumps own party is largely against this. Most of the public is against it. The opposition is definitely against it.
Move along now
10
TigerUSA20Mar 28, 2026
+7
Well perhaps..... But trump's own party in the U.S. Senate was still cowardly enough to not vote for a bill designed to block President Trump from using military force in the joint U.S.-Israeli war in Iran without approval from Congress. So, in fact, Republicans are for it.
[https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5799286-iran-war-powers-resolution-defeated/](https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5799286-iran-war-powers-resolution-defeated/)
7
Do__Math__Not__MethMar 28, 2026
+4
Publicly, sure they’re all against it, but their bank accounts may tell a different story with all the insider trading they do
4
throwaway277252Mar 28, 2026
+4
> Trumps own party is largely against this.
They could act together with the democrats at any time to stop him if that were truly the case and not a performance to deceive you.
4
KageStarMar 28, 2026
+2
There's no deception. They don't agree with Trump's handling of the situation but they like getting elected and maintaining power so they don't vote against him because they're getting everything else they want right now.
2
Xylus1985Mar 28, 2026
+1
They may say they are against Trump, but they are not lifting a finger to stop him. When dealing with politicians, don’t listen to what they say, look at what they do
1
StudySpecialMar 28, 2026
+1
The opposition has made a stink about it and brought several votes in congress relating to the war powers act.
But they are the opposition.. so, shock horror, their votes haven’t passed because they don’t have a majority.
1
Puzzled_Cold_3906Mar 28, 2026
-1
Ig only option for common people is to vote him out in mid term by impeachment. Otherwise he have his eyes on Cuba then Pakistan after this Iran conflict. And Russia is heavily backing Cuba, so yk what happen if that conflict happens
(Trump have stopped any oil gas from reaching cuba and russia have send their ship full of oil to cuba just few days ago) there were talks if usa bombs this ship, Russia will join
-1
G14F1L0L1Y401D0MTR4PMar 28, 2026
+255
Imagine the Houthis block the other strait 💀
255
bratbarnMar 28, 2026
+112
Everyone going around the horn and charging 5x 😔
112
supercali45Mar 28, 2026
+49
People think prices are high now …
49
PeterNippelsteinMar 28, 2026
+10
Bicycle market bout to blow up
10
randomboreddad69Mar 28, 2026
+6
Or scooters
6
nekonightMar 28, 2026
+12
That never really stopped since the houthis first started. This basically stay even after houthis say they would stop mostly because insurance never trusted them so war risk was still required. The high value stuff was still being routed to the horn or Panama. Its only the low value bulk cargo or old ships that was paying war risk insurance and going though the red sea.
The prices going up if houthis start shooting again is just going to be because the middle man taking advantage of it and raising prices.
12
Impossible-Fig-8463Mar 28, 2026
+56
All that’s left is for South Africa to somehow blockade the cape of good hope lol. Then we’re back to the silk road
56
underscoreftwMar 28, 2026
+65
Silk Road involves crossing Iran...
65
Impossible-Fig-8463Mar 28, 2026
+19
We can modify the route so we go over Kazakhstan Georgia, then Eastern Europe boom there you have it nutmeg cinnamon and spices galore
19
Ampallang80Mar 28, 2026
+17
I’d say TransSiberian railway since they love Putin but it’s Trans
17
Impossible-Fig-8463Mar 28, 2026
+7
God, what a sad state of affairs where we joke about bringing bullshit from China to the rest of the world on camels and shit over land.
7
Better-Lunch670Mar 28, 2026
+3
Don't worry. Elon will still be playing Spaceman
3
billybonghortonMar 28, 2026
+2
Inside a k hole.
2
DSA300Mar 28, 2026
+3
Gas prices gonna quintuple
3
Impossible-Fig-8463Mar 28, 2026
+2
At least some will get gas
2
xynith116Mar 28, 2026
+12
It’s almost like we need some kind of *Belt and Road Initiative*.
12
CryptoThroway8205Mar 28, 2026
+3
There's rails that don't cross through Iran that go from China to Spain. But I guess they go through Russia instead.
https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/eurasian-landbridge-and-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative
3
dogmaticstarMar 28, 2026
+2
god we are so fucked
2
xynith116Mar 28, 2026
+7
Don’t underestimate the penguins! 🐧 💣
7
Impossible-Fig-8463Mar 28, 2026
+2
I can’t tell if you mean that the South Pole penguins are gonna help South Africa blockade the cape of good hope, or that we use Antarctica for shipment of goods
2
xynith116Mar 28, 2026
+2
Shh don’t talk too loud. Trump might hear you
2
Do__Math__Not__MethMar 28, 2026
+1
Sidney Crosby tripled my gas prices /s
1
tb30kMar 28, 2026
+17
Nothing to imagine. They've been held as a wild card .
17
CaptainCanuck93Mar 28, 2026
+5
A "Trump" card, even
5
PeripatetictylMar 28, 2026
I mean, nobody wants a wild card, okay? It doesn't make any sense. We don't want a maniac in our group. There's no benefit to it.
0
WaffleHouseGladiatorMar 28, 2026
+6
When do we go full Mad Max?
6
IntelArtiGenMar 28, 2026
+8
If they could, they would. But after months of war in 2024 and 2025 I'm not sure they're willing to do it again. It's easy to say on listnook "imagine people take the risk to start a war and die". It's harder for them to actually take that risk, most people usually want to live a long & peaceful life, and after years of wars and destruction it's hard to be able or willing to continue that forever.
8
KhamvomMar 28, 2026
+12
It’d be a dumb move.
Houthi’s heavily rely on the strait and ports being open, 80% of their stuff (food, fuel weapons, etc) are smuggled or shipped by sea.
12
ross571Mar 28, 2026
-7
The Houthis won last time too.
-7
MrF_lawblogMar 28, 2026
All the need to do is take out the east west pipeline and they'd effectively taken out the red sea.
0
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
-30
[removed]
-30
Sad-Society-57Mar 28, 2026
+10
Do you have a reason to want that?
10
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
-8
[removed]
-8
JD0x0Mar 28, 2026
+12
"US & Israel did a boo-boo to the stock market, let's cheer on literal terrorists!"
12
DarthShivMar 28, 2026
-7
The US and Israel are literally the biggest terrorists post WWII and it's not close
-7
Trevor-LawrenceMar 28, 2026
+4
How come you're posting on a website owned by a US company then? Isn't that kind of supporting terrorism?
4
emmerMar 28, 2026
+3
Your brain on listnook btw☝️
3
DarthShivMar 28, 2026
+1
Hate on the truth bro how many millions killed by US instigated Govt overthrow and wars
1
HeadmasterPrimeMnstrMar 28, 2026
-11
> US & Israel did a boo-boo to the stock market
You have to be a real ignorant sum o' gun to believe this is just about the stock market, when the consequences of this war are having immediate & disastrous consequences for Asian countries reliant on ME oil.
> let's cheer on literal terrorists!
Brother, cut the terrorist shit. Literally everyone operating in the Middle East is a sponsor of someone's terrorism. I'm not engaging with this WoT millienial-era bullshit.
I'm not defending the Houthis, I simply stated that I understand why people may be keen on hoping for blowback consequences to the US for it's imperialism and aggressive militarism.
-11
HugsForUpvotesMar 28, 2026
+11
But you're actively cheering and hoping for more "disastrous consequences for Asian countries reliant on ME oil." And Iran is the largest terrorist sponsor in the world.
I'm against this war because I think it's impractical, but I'd love to be wrong. I'd love for the IRGC to fold tomorrow and for everyone in Iran to finally be free from a mass murdering theocracy. Trump would get a big win, but my thoughts would be with the Iranian people who have freedom and hope. Also you're not just defending the Houthis, you're actively cheering for them shoot missiles at civilians.
You might not like the US, but this type of talk is not only incredibly immoral - it's also completely impractical. No one electable is going to sympathize with any political group cheering for dead American soldiers. Candidates already affiliated with these people will be buried and Trump will happily let the bus run them over instead of him for causing those troops to die in the first place.
11
emmerMar 28, 2026
+3
And you have to be a real Listnookor to go to bat for the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism. They direct and supply proxies which fire missiles at merchant vessels, thousands of unguided rockets into cities and kidnap/kill innocent civilians attending a concert. They have killed thousands of their own civilians, for protesting.
I know you were keen to just hand wave all that away, but it’s nuance required for any meaningful discussion of the subject.
3
JY0950Mar 28, 2026
+1
Amateurish compared to the number of countries violated by the CIA.
1
LostnFoundAgainAgainMar 28, 2026
+5
This is very short sighted in my opinion, if Hormuz were to attack the other strait it will likely lead to further bombings by other countries, which would further destabilise the Middle East.
Hormuz is a recognised terrorist organisation by a LOT of countries, countries not involved in the Iran conflict will bomb them, that most likely includes Europe who is the most likely would be one of the worst affected by the attack on the other strait.
Wanting the US and Israel to feel consequences isn't something a lot of countries will want, they simply want the strait to be opened up, therefore want the war to end.
Iran isn't a saint in all this either, Iran at the end of the day is a country that has openly supported terrorist organisations, is a religious fundamental country to the point they have killed women and girls in their country trying to oppose their oppressive laws, and have gunned down hundreds if not thousands of protesters.
The US and Israel aren't a saint either obviously, but honestly, there isn't a good guy in this war.
5
84CressidaMar 28, 2026
+1
What absolutely vile remarks. Completely detached from reality too.
1
HeadmasterPrimeMnstrMar 28, 2026
What is so vile about literally acknowledging the reality happening on the ground among the population of non-Western people across the planet?
Is your mindset so racist and privileged that you are unable to comphrehend how others may view Israel & the US, especially in the context of a war that **they** started?
0
JY0950Mar 28, 2026
+1
Speaking from someone in South East Asia, I think what we want is peace not the US paying the price and everyone dying as a result.
1
HeadmasterPrimeMnstrMar 28, 2026
Yes, everyone wants that, but among every population on Earth, you have people with more reactionary & greivance based beliefs that are primarily fueled by anger & emotion.
A lot of those people are likely very angry about US imperialism in the Middle East causing the destabilization of the globale economy.
I said especially in Southeast Asia because they're uniquely and disproportionately affected by the destabilization of energy markets from the Gulf states.
Instead of this being a nuanced discussion about the consequences of imperialism and the effects it has on people across the globe, we have idiots among the villages of idiots doing Bush-era terrorism politics & pretending I am doing a whole-throated defense of Iran because I am not uncritically critical of Iran.
0
JY0950Mar 28, 2026
+1
Well imperialism be it under European powers, the US, Irsael or in the future the Chinese will be the same, I just feel you advocating for the "punishment of US imperialism" like ok understandable, but the US is so tied to the global economy that if it happens, the world would suffer tremendously also.
1
84CressidaMar 28, 2026
+17
You hope a terrorist organization blocks the strait of Hormuz? Interesting.
17
TheSleepyTruthMar 28, 2026
+16
In case you havent noticed Listnook is now teeming with overt Iranian regime propagandists.
16
84CressidaMar 28, 2026
+10
It’s so funny. The ones also arguing that the US and Israel are just as bad or worse than f****** Iran. I just can’t. So many truly ignorant and sick people on here that have no grip on reality.
10
JY0950Mar 28, 2026
-1
The US has been sponsoring terrorism since the 50s, Iran since the 70s.
-1
alkaliphilesMar 28, 2026
-7
How would you characterize the dynamic between Israel and Gaza? Nothing bad happening over there?
-7
84CressidaMar 28, 2026
+9
October 7th was Iran’s fault too. Great point.
9
emmerMar 28, 2026
+2
Well Irans terrorist proxy Hamas kidnapped, raped and murdered hundred of young people attending a concert. Understandably things haven’t been great since
2
PruzterMar 28, 2026
+5
It’s a mental illness
5
tb30kMar 28, 2026
-3
A country? How are they terroist organization? lol
-3
snizlesMar 28, 2026
+3
Which ‘country’?
3
tb30kMar 28, 2026
-2
You tell me? Country's fighting . Where is the terrorist organization?
-2
TheSleepyTruthMar 28, 2026
+3
Do you want the Houthis to get slaughtered? Because thats the end result of such action.
3
BreakfastMedical5164Mar 28, 2026
-3
irl pawn checkmating the king lmao
-3
Miami-JonesMar 28, 2026
+36
The sun is free. Why do you think the orange dingdong hates free energy?
36
xynith116Mar 28, 2026
+9
Why allow people to have energy for free when he can make money off of it?
9
Miami-JonesMar 28, 2026
+1
Missing the point
1
xynith116Mar 28, 2026
+2
Misread your comment mb
2
Cyclone050Mar 28, 2026
+6
These fools should read the room. Sensible people are trying to deescalate. Yemen does not need this. They couldn’t handle attacks from Saudi Arabia and now they want to insert themselves in here. They should check with Hizbollah about what happened to their trigger happy fingers.
6
bikbar1Mar 28, 2026
+22
So these slave trading pirates would be the next champions of listnook because Trump is azzhole ?
22
kishorecmgbMar 28, 2026
+6
That's what you get when you enter "special military operation" of your own choice
6
zokka_son_of_zokkaMar 28, 2026
+1
Funny how y'all screwm "lesser evil" when it's convenient for you, yet refuse to acknowledge the concept outside of elections
1
Open_Potato_5686Mar 28, 2026
+20
Poor things have zero chance of survival
20
faizimamMar 28, 2026
+1
Who are you referring to? Saudi? USA?
Because a carrier strike group plus international partners has been assaulting the houthis for nearly 5 years now, and they've not accomplished much of anything.
1
TheOriginalBroConeMar 28, 2026
+1
Yea I'm sure they're referring to the US and not the desert bandits, dumbass.
1
GreyClayMar 28, 2026
+39
The strangest thing about this entire conflict for me has been the lack of involvement **thus far** from *Ansar Allah* (aka ‘the Houthis’)
Iran are very obviously keeping them out of things to be only used as a last resort - ‘break glass in case of emergency.’
It’s pretty remarkable that the Iranian regime feels things have been going well enough that they haven’t yet directed *Ansar Allah* to get involved in the fighting yet.
They are a seriously formidable enemy. They control half of Yemen and have access to some pretty effective weaponry. For example ‘the Houthis’ shot down more than a dozen Reaper drones before this current conflict began - at a cost of about $30 million each. At one stage they shot down 7 Reapers in just 6 weeks.
39
KhamvomMar 28, 2026
+81
The Houthi’s used up a lot of their long-range stuff (cruise missiles, drones, etc) over the years and resupply from Iran has only gotten more and more difficult.
There’s also an informal ceasefire with the Saudi-Yemen Coalition (who control the other half of Yemen). If the Houthi’s jump in, they’d likely be fighting a two-front war and they know it.
81
StockengineerMar 28, 2026
+15
If they don’t fight when it comes down to it, they actually will be next 😂
15
demonica123Mar 28, 2026
+2
What are you talking about? Haven't you heard Iran is winning this war? Just a few more days and Trump will call it all off.
2
xynith116Mar 28, 2026
+3
KSA not gonna move any of their limited military when they’re still under missile threat from Iran.
3
r2002Mar 28, 2026
+5
> resupply from Iran has only gotten more and more difficult
It would make sense for Russia to get in on this. More chaos means less international support for Ukraine and higher gas prices means big money for Russia.
5
Groundbreaking_Can_4Mar 28, 2026
+1
Saudi-yemen coalition controls like 75% or more of Yemen at this point. Houthi has the capital and a couple of villages
Most journalists from Yemen I follow seem to believe that if they join this might be the end of them and that's why they're so hesitant to join
1
BelgravianaMar 28, 2026
+1
The Saudi coalition controls the most territory but its largely empty. The Houthis overwhelmingly control upwards of 80% of the population
1
GreyClayMar 28, 2026
-12
I agree.
But at the end of the day if Iran orders them to fight, they have to fight. See Hezbollah for example, they have been hit **far** harder than *Ansar Allah*, yet they were instructed to fight.
As I said in my original comment - which some people are hilariously misinterpreting - I find it amazing that Iran hasn’t yet ordered them to fight.
-12
KhamvomMar 28, 2026
+9
There’s been previous reporting that the Houthi’s haven’t been listening to Iran as much. They exercise a great deal of autonomy vs other proxy groups, so that might be a factor as well.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/iran-loses-control-houthis-060000499.html
9
GreyClayMar 28, 2026
+2
They are a really perplexing group - they also have truces and ‘shared understandings’ with AQAP and Somalia’s ‘Al-Shabaab’ (two Sunni jihadist groups who aren’t exactly known for their close working relations with Shia groups)
2
2beatenupMar 28, 2026
+2
Your enemies… enemy is my friend.
2
Playful_AlelaMar 28, 2026
+46
The Houthis have had their capabilities pretty seriously degraded over the past couple years, you're glazing them really hard. Shooting down reapers sucks for whoever has to pay the price to replace them, but they don't really represent insane military capability or anything. They have depleted a lot of their Iranian cruise/ballistic missiles
46
jscummyMar 28, 2026
+8
Reapers cruise at just north of 200mph with no stealth capabilities, but I guess altitude might pose some challenges
8
84CressidaMar 28, 2026
+57
Probably because Israel has taken them out for October 7th and they’re far weaker than you are projecting.
Everyone on Listnook seems to think Iran is holding back some grand plan to “really unleash hell”. They can’t even defend their own f****** airspace 😂
57
taco_bonesMar 28, 2026
+11
any oil tankers getting transported through Iranian airspace?
11
xynith116Mar 28, 2026
+2
Flying tankers like the helicarrier from MCU. Might as well load the crude onto rockets.
2
Krypt0nightMar 28, 2026
+12
Omg you're right I totally forgot that them not being able to defend their airspace means the strait magically opens and gas prices go back down! 😂
12
StockengineerMar 28, 2026
Kind of like the American military… can’t even win with air superiority. Waiting for America to start another 20+ year ME war
0
HeadmasterPrimeMnstrMar 28, 2026
-12
Look at this guy, operating on antiquated 20th century ideals of warfare in the year 2026 lmao.
You are in for a very, very rude awakening.
-12
rhschumacMar 28, 2026
-8
Your short memory fails you. We tried to bomb the Houthi’s to no avail and eventually backed off.
-8
mvearthmjsunMar 28, 2026
-5
Iran is completely decapitated, and have resorted to gorilla warfare. Their leadership is killed, their navy is gone, they have no air defenses in their capital, and every military asset they own is getting bombed to oblivion.
If you believe that they think this is going well, or that this is part of some master plan you're out to lunch. They're a fragmented group of provinces desperately shooting toys-r-us drones while what's left of their chain of command hides underground.
-5
graviousishpspongeMar 28, 2026
+9
Desert Gorillas?
9
xynith116Mar 28, 2026
+7
Gorillas are from Africa, duh
7
GreyClayMar 28, 2026
+9
It’s called **guerrilla** warfare bro.
And remind me - how did guerrilla warfare work out for the US in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan again?
9
KageStarMar 28, 2026
+4
They won the military battles in each of those wars but lost the political ones.
4
South-Attorney-5209Mar 28, 2026
+2
Great but that is not how you win modern wars. Iran is winning the war until the US can promise with 100% certainty a drone or bomb wont touch a single tanker in the Strait and have evidence to prove it.
There is literally no way that the US can strategical win this war with the military without collapsing the already dwindling political support it has.
Once asian oil reserves run out in 10-15 days and they are paying $200+ / barrel, Trump will have no choice but to capitulate, claim he won and retreat.
2
MountainMan17Mar 28, 2026
+1
You clearly have much insight to offer. Please post more...
1
rhschumacMar 28, 2026
-12
Yet another clueless comment courtesy of Israeli misinformation. While it’s true Iran does support the Houthis. They act autonomously and have more of an allegiance to the Palestinian people than to Iran directly. This is more complicated than Iran simply ordering them around. They see Iran as another meddling power in the middle east despite being supported by them.
-12
Reddit0sernameMar 28, 2026
-9
My thoughts exactly. They don’t seem to be in all out war. No boots on the ground.
-9
84CressidaMar 28, 2026
+22
They’re literally recruiting 12 year olds to fight.
22
AstralsketchMar 28, 2026
-6
they are recruiting for military support roles 12 year olds. It remains to be seen if any will actually pick up an ak.
-6
84CressidaMar 28, 2026
+14
If you have to enlist the help of 12 year olds at all, you’re already in desperation mode.
14
IntelArtiGenMar 28, 2026
+6
> It remains to be seen if any will actually pick up an ak.
https://www.dw.com/en/underage-martyrs-recruiting-child-soldiers-in-yemen/a-58203651
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/6/16/houthis-continue-to-recruit-child-soldiers-despite-yemen-truce
https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/02/13/yemen-houthis-recruit-more-child-soldiers-october-7
For Iran, for now, maybe, but I highly recommend to read more about what the Houthis or even Hezbollah are doing.
6
Reddit0sernameMar 28, 2026
-6
Yeah, maybe. If that news story is true, but they still haven’t done anything yet it’s all been drones which to me seems crazy when their entire country is under attack.
-6
newmoonchaperoneMar 28, 2026
+2
*"safety's off, m***********!"*
2
DaGrouchy5196Mar 28, 2026
+5
Feel so bad for the kids in that photo.
5
whoopercheesieMar 28, 2026
+1
These are the dumbest of the dumb
1
mastad0420Mar 28, 2026
-3
No one is afraid of the Houthis
-3
Castrol-5w30Mar 28, 2026
+26
Except people in shipping.
26
ferpyyMar 28, 2026
+18
Source: mastad0420
18
4everadumdumMar 28, 2026
+4
Trust him bro.
4
Extension-Pick8310Mar 28, 2026
-28
I can’t believe I’m rooting for the f****** Houthis.
-28
throwaway277252Mar 28, 2026
+19
I can't believe you are either.
19
KarpattataMar 28, 2026
+13
Then why are you? Do you know what they've done in Yemen?
13
Stop_DoomscrollingMar 28, 2026
+19
Then wake up
19
protomenaceMar 28, 2026
+6
You know their war has killed 2x-3x more than Israel?
143 Comments