I've been playing the piano for almost 4 years now, and I've been producing beats and making hip hop for the past 2 months. I can say without a doubt that music is my passion, something I'll pursue forever.
And before I get into my main argument, I want to point out that I don't despise ALL of AI. I only hate when AI gets involved in literature, art, music, etc.
A few days ago, I decided to take a break from my homework and scroll on Tik Tok. I stumbled upon this ad for a generative AI app called Suno, which I'm sure many of you are familiar with at this point. In the ad, it pointed out that this app was "revolutionary" and that it was the next generation of music. The comments said the same thing, too.
Out of curiosity, I visited the app for myself, and I decided to make a quick song using some random rhymes. The result came out way better than I expected, and this is what concerned me. If someone could make a decent song in just a few minutes, what could that mean for real artists who take their time to actually work on their songs?
And I've heard many other arguments, one of such being "Oh, but some people are insecure about their voice!" or "Some people don't have good songwriting skills!". Okay? That's just a lousy excuse. The first few songs I made were horrible. My voice was horrible, the beat was horrible, the lyrics were horrible. But did I resort to using AI to make music? No. I kept going and as of right now, I can see so much improvement in myself. There is absolutely no excuse for using AI music.
On the bright side it could spur up and coming artists to strive for more unique sound and structure. Popular music has become so sterile already at some point something has to give… I hope. I never thought I’d be lucky for simply starting a discography a decade before the advent of these tools as proof its ai free. I think I recall daft punk saying the reason they retired was because music was becoming too automated and robotic. Classic excuse for the robots.
1
stev_mempersMar 28, 2026
+6
One hopes, but I think it's only going to discourage more people from taking up music or other arts in the first place. Why go to all the trouble when you can just type a prompt?
6
Kraz_IMar 28, 2026
+2
Because if you have music in your mind, the AI can’t take that and turn it into reality. You need to learn the craft and do it yourself. What the AI makes is just something else, but it’s not yours.
If AI could read your mind and make a song exactly as you envisioned it, then that would be art. But this technology doesn’t exist yet.
2
thederevolutionsMar 28, 2026
+1
Well it’s not like it’ll ever be able to write anything like Bohemian Rhapsody or The Real Slim Shady at the right time in history. In fact, it couldn’t come close and it won’t come close in the future because it can only predict an average of what’s been done. The best artists will always outpace it in terms of originality, feeling and meaning. What about a good cover, that sounds simpler? Well wake me up when it outdoes All Along the Watchtower by Jimi Hendrix. It can’t even take LSD! /s
1
phylum_sinterMar 28, 2026
+1
I think it's pretty clear that wherever AI shows up, there's a huge pushback against it. Whether it is in music, movies, books, or even videogames that have normally been one of the regularly accepted places developers could make procedural (seeded randomized) maps, or of course making enemy combatants in fighting games.
But making music or any kind of art, It's always a gamble, and many of the recording engineers and studio owners i've grown up working for have said that it is largely rigged but also luck -- most musicians who stick with it truly are unemployable in almost any other way, but even then, it's like buying a l****** ticket and presuming you've got the w***** every week.
"You gotta believe!" in yourself lol... we need another Parappa the Rapper game.
We need to realize we are worth more than what the entertainment business and fame will ever bring. To those starting out right now, or those knocked down by the circumstances of their lives or whatever - everybody needs to figure out how to get hungry enough to care about growing your own talent, learn to laugh about failures, and just keep going.
1
phylum_sinterMar 28, 2026
+1
I'm sorry, I think that's goofy, what you're saying to me is like saying "well maybe they'll become a better banker if they just use the s*** machines a bit more".
The actual tools to learn how to make music have never been cheaper and more accessible. All one has to do is resist the shortcut that bypasses their own skill development to start seeing how rewarding it can be.
1
EeckaMar 28, 2026
+1
And an ”AI artist” is just a moron.
1
officeman88Mar 28, 2026
+1
AI itself is art. Software art
1
err0rzMar 28, 2026
+36
We all hate AI “music”. That’s why 50 people make this same post every day.
36
tararira1Mar 28, 2026
+3
And 50 more people complain about streaming and some bots shill for Qobuz
3
violetdopamineMar 28, 2026
+12
I honestly never get sick of seeing it lmfao

12
phylum_sinterMar 28, 2026
+3
I'll allow and occasionally encourage it
3
Pleasant-Chef6055Mar 28, 2026
+34
It isn’t music or art. It’s just stolen work from humans pooped out of a machine in a unrecognizable form.
34
FlamingMothBallsMar 28, 2026
+12
AI doesn't, can't, create art. For art to exist it has to have an artist. AI isn't art. Therefore anything it makes also isn't art.
12
MrGoodMan64Mar 28, 2026
+3
All that talk for a cold as ice take. We get it ai is all shit
3
darkmarke82Mar 28, 2026
+7
this....is a suno ad.
7
OnceIWasYouMar 28, 2026
+5
*"And I've heard many other arguments, one of such being "Oh, but some people are insecure about their voice!" or "Some people don't have good songwriting skills!". Okay? That's just a lousy excuse."*
Don't they realise that that just means they are NOT GOOD?! AI songwriting "Help" is just cheating like in a game but in real life. There's no creative control there so it is NOT "Their" song.
We all spend DECADES trying to master an instrument of create something beautiful and then people effectively just plagiarise and steal other people's creativity through software. I suppose some people just don't care. They have no true passion for music or art or writing so presumably don't care about whatever satisfaction or cathartic release could be gotten through actually creating these things- they just want money and/or attention.
5
pahamackMar 28, 2026
+3
It's an interesting conversation about the nature of art.
If I tell an AI to give me a 4/4 beat, then play over it with the chords G, C and D, using a distorted guitar sound... then adjusting the timing until it's what i want... that's not art, right?
now what happens if instead i find a record and slow it down and speed it up using digital techniques... until it is just right doing my 4/4 beat and G, D, C chords. Is this art? Because this is sampling, right?
\*EDIT\* i'm not really sure why i'm being downvoted. I would've thought everyone should be having these discussions. Or, if there's real obvious answers to this, then sharing them.
3
SpiderslandMar 28, 2026
+6
I’ve certainly considered that aspect.
But it’s more like, if you go to a restaurant and specifically tell them what you want them to make, and they make it, are you a chef?
What if you listed every single ingredient, and then they made it for you?
Could you then bring it to another table and say, look at this beautiful meal I made!
Sampling is if you took something existing, work on it enough that it’s recognizable as another dish, but original enough to be a new one, and then serve that in your own restaurant that you fund and work f****** hard on.
And in this analogy some of the samplers could basically be serving identical dishes, but they still put the work in to make it their own and to build something.
AI goes so deep it’s basically like getting a frozen meal from the super market and trying to sell it as a masterpiece. But it’s cooked because the quality can be similar to if it was freshly made by a qualified chef.
6
pahamackMar 28, 2026
-1
well are you?
because no restaurant would allow you to do that. because that's the chef's job.
No restaurant would allow me to make up my own dish, with notes, and precise timings.
They would rightfully tell me to f*** off and make it myself at home.
But doesn't Gordon Ramsay tell other chefs to execute his thoughts all the time? He has a shitload of restaurants in different countries and they're all executing his recipes to his standards.
Here's a thought experiment: I have infinite money. I hire the best musicians in the world to precisely recreate this piece of music that is in my head. I take an entire year of their time adjusting their output until it is exactly what i want.
Am I an artist? Do I have a place in the list of songwriters? Because I'm pretty sure artists have done this or equivalent especially in painting, where artists would have a lot of assistants to execute their vision.
-1
mrbanvardMar 28, 2026
+2
I think an important aspect when considering your thought experiment is how people value art.
For some people all that matters is the end result. They don't care how it was produced.
Other people care about the process and the process is part of the art.
If course those are extremes and people can care about both in different amounts.
With music, for me, there are songsi have in a playlist that I love and listen to a lot and I couldn't even tell you what the song is called who the creator is.
Other songs are ones where I know a lot about the artist and how the song came to be.
So in your thought experiment, yes you are an artist, but not one everyone will appeal to certain people. Which is perfectly fine. You could still produce something great.
I'm also ok with AI used in music creation. If it sounds amazing then I don't care if it was created with a prompt and no real thought or intent from creator. I'll still enjoy listening to it. But I won't care about how it was created.
But if an artist has used AI in an interesting or complex or novel way to to produce excellent music then that's fascinating to me as well and part of the artistry.
Ultimately I think AI just sets a new floor of what low effort art can be. Just right now that AI art often seems pretty good.
But people will (and already are) still put in loads of effort, using AI as a tool, and create art that is way beyond what AI can do with low effort.
People complain about AI slop but forget that AI isn't prompting itself. The actual problem is human slop, which has been an issue for a long time.
And like with every new tool, some people will use it to create slop and others will use it create awesome stuff. It's just slop is a lot faster and easier and makes great rage bait for the media, so we haven't yet got to see much of the awesome artistry.
2
PolywogowyloPMar 28, 2026
+15
I think the difference is in the process not the product. The latter is a found sound and requires artistic intention.
15
pahamackMar 28, 2026
Seems like a distinction without a difference to me. If you are carefully adjusting AI output, let's say you adjust the sustain on the chords by the microsecond until it is just right, carefully adjusting the tone on the guitar until it is exactly what you want by fiddling around with different distortion pedals and pre-amps, changing strumming patterns and telling the AI which notes to palm mute for that perfect chug-chug... what is that but intention?
I'm like everyone here, concerned about AI and AI slop, but it's very confusing to me what it means for art precisely if an artist uses it with real intention.
0
Mambutu_OMar 28, 2026
+2
You're being downvoted because using logic with the intention of having an honest productive exchange is strictly prohibited on listnook.
2
BuddyLegsBaileyMar 28, 2026
+1
>If I tell an AI to give me a 4/4 beat, then play over it with the chords G, C and D, using a distorted guitar sound... then adjusting the timing until it's what i want... that's not art, right?
I'd say so, yes
1
snanarcticaMar 28, 2026
+1
It’s bad lol. Ai can’t make art for some reason
1
kidjupiterMar 28, 2026
+1
I speed scroll past any ad or post with AI images.
1
Commercial-Comb9249Mar 28, 2026
+1
Generative AI tends to drive the value of digital content to zero. Why would someone listen to an AI song when there are a million others? Attention is a finite resource.
1
Presently_AbsentMar 28, 2026
+1
Whoa now buddy. Easy with the hot takes!
1
RuncleGrapeMar 28, 2026
+1
I think this is something that is not going to go away unfortunately. AI will become endemic in art. It is the new technology and someone, somewhere, will find a way to capitalize on this new technology and create a new thing in a way we never imagined, just like when the electric guitar and tube amps first came out. We don't know where music is heading, but it's going to break new ground soon enough and create weird niche subcultures, just like everything else has. As for the real artists competing with AI, they will be pushed to do more raw live performances. Whether new gen performers will play original music written by themselves or whether they use AI assistance is an ethical question listeners will answer for them
1
57thStilgarMar 28, 2026
+1
Use google to look shit up?
AI
1
cjguigniMar 28, 2026
+1
So brave. Finally, someone said it in this sub.
1
Sure-Challenge1919Mar 28, 2026
+1
Its not art.

1
phylum_sinterMar 28, 2026
+1
Outsourcing your imagination and creativity to a literal machine that is like being best friends with the most grifting-ass plaigerist in the universe. It's not even acceptable for this c*** to be used in advertising. It's the opposite of the move for anyone who calls themselves an artist.
I think where you've landed about it being ok for things -- stuff like spellcheck, and maybe as a drunken research assistant that have a penchant for compulsive lying, but more seriously as a way to surface medical cures and whatnot before anybody gets hurt is noble -- this is where most thinking people are landing.
Folks insecure about their own expressions will continue to see no problems with it, and some folks can't even distinguish the slop as it is, but there are also people that go to my favorite restaurant and constantly say they love the music... which I can say every single time is just a muzak, laidback remix of a pop song. I could get angry at the owners, but I know that even muzak is almost always licensed, and is a separate segment of the music industry.
I'm saying there are places AI fits, but not anywhere human ingenuity and creativity are what people are looking for. Just as you say - glad to see others land in this spot too. Glad to hear you've gone as far as you have, that experience will make your output like a fine wine, and that continues to get better the longer you look inside and reflect.
Some people haven't seen the Miyazaki video, but tl;dr he's one of the greatest visual artists and his studio Ghibli has inspired like 4 generations of artists now. In this video, his studio of brilliant artists are showing their new projects. Some of the team decides to make something with AI... the reaction was just the death of hope in his expression, he said something like “I feel like we are nearing the end of times. ***We humans are losing faith in ourselves***."
That's exactly what is happening. Technology has diminished the triumph of just doing something yourself, convenience of making use of free tools that barely survive by shoving advertising at us first to have them "make pictures or sounds" from a prompt alone is a slippery slope, but just as people are difficult to convince to buy music now, even more people getting into making music are lured into these thirst traps that feed into their own creative insecurity.
Just as people are deciding who they are, they're being pushed into a world where all people are made to look foolish who don't hop onto trends, where those who genuinely care are seen as "cute" and ineffective, all of this in the idiotic chase for more money by a rapidly shrinking pool of geedy techbro grifters.
So what is the solution? For me, and hopefully the world, is to just champion the stuff you know is made from people who care about their own skills and talent. Likewise, whether you see a brand new debut of a musician or artist of any kind, let them know you see how easy it could be to just be lazy, outsource their own creative vision and accept the slopfest that AI can deliver. Let them know people over technology is how you live. Let them know only humans make art, that some tools make the user the monkey, and that you can feel/notice resonate with their work.
1
SpicyMeatloaf1Mar 28, 2026
+1
And thats pretty much any new hip hop song now lol. They forgot about their roots and stopped sampling
1
MajorComradeMar 28, 2026
+1

1
Interesting-Quiet832Mar 28, 2026
hot take
0
Late_Aardvark8125Mar 28, 2026
-10
But it's the truth
-10
Interesting-Quiet832Mar 28, 2026
+2
Sarcasm has a common, accepted definition**:** the use of words that mean the opposite of what one intends to say especially in order to insult, to show irritation, or to be funny
2
holeinmybootMar 28, 2026
+1
generating and taking pride in AI art or music should herald the apocalypse imo.
1
illusiionszMar 28, 2026
i get it, like there's something so personal about creating music that ai just can't replicate. been playing guitar for 2 years and the whole process of figuring out a melody is what makes it special.
0
XamadoMar 28, 2026
+3
Yeah true, and that goes for all art. The most impressive art is impressive because someone (i.e. a person) made it.
Art is impressive because it's a reflection of human talent. Art is resonant because it's a reflection of real human emotions felt by the artist. etc etc
3
CO_74Mar 28, 2026
+2
How is that any different that people who hate button pressers, aka “people who make beats”?
It used to take musical talent to make music. It doesn’t anymore. I got free tickets to an imagine dragons show a few years ago and I swear I don’t think there was anything they played that I couldn’t play with about two weeks of practice.
It just doesn’t take any skill to make music that people find popular anymore. People are crying about AI slop, but it sounds pretty much like the slop people have been “making” for the last few years anyway. Zero creativity. Zero dynamic range. Zero variations on a theme.
In fact, since about 2005, music has sounded about the same. There is no “sound of the 2000s” or “sound of the 2010s”. When an 80s song comes on, everyone knows it. We know the 70s, 60s, 90s - almost across any genre. You can hear the difference.
And the worst part is that increasingly, the only people getting famous or recognized for music were already little rich kids, for the most part. There used to be a chance for someone to write great songs, bust their butt playing shows, develop a following, and build something. A radio DJ might hear a great song or a great band and promote it. A music magazine might feature a review of a band, too, that would help out. None of that shit exists anymore.
Now, some millionaire will decide if who “makes it”. The radio DJ, the newspaper, the guy making the music - it’s the same person. There is no way to break out. No way to get recognized. It was difficult before, but impossible now.
And because no one hears great music anymore, fewer and fewer people are trying to make it. There are fewer “real” musicians than ever. Just some guy with a little loop machine and a drum pad pressing button in front of a crowd doomscrolling in their phones.
Porcupine Tree really predicted it with their song “The Sound of Muzak” they released in 2002 (https://youtu.be/4ulgVOBpNWA?si=HTIwrY2g0D3Bi1N7). They wrote:
Hear the sound of music
Drifting in the aisles.
Elevator Prozac
Stretching on for miles.
Music of the future
Will not entertain.
It's only meant to repress
And neutralize your brain.
Soul gets squeezed out.
Edges get blunt.
Demographic
Gives what you want.
One of the wonders of the world is going down,
It's going down, I know.
It's one of the blunders of the world that no-one cares.
No-one cares enough.
Now the sound of music
Comes in silver pills.
Engineered to suit you
Building cheaper thrills.
Music of rebellion
Makes you wanna rage.
But it's made by millionaires
Who are nearly twice your age.
Soul gets squeezed out.
Edges get blunt.
Demographic
Gives what you want.
2
grahamlesterMar 28, 2026
-3
97% of people can't tell if music is AI or not and that number will get larger. So, you might hate the notion of it but still find yourself liking the results, even without knowing it.
-3
Late_Aardvark8125Mar 28, 2026
+5
That's my concern.
5
grahamlesterMar 28, 2026
Just to answer another one of your questions, though, I am 65years old and very busy. I do not have time to develop musical skills. I write lyrics and have AI turn them into songs. It is a lot more fun than doing the crossword and I would be employing zero musicians either way. If the AI stole somebody's tune and the song took off I would give the person who wrote the tune 50% very happily. That would be money they would not otherwise have seen.
0
space2occupyMar 28, 2026
+5
The whole AI process uses all the music that’s been fed to it to “create,” yet no musicians are getting royalties or even credit for their input
5
grahamlesterMar 28, 2026
-2
If anyone's composition is stolen then they still have copyright protection, just as they would if an individual stole it.
-2
PolywogowyloPMar 28, 2026
+2
Models are trained on such vast catalogs of music that no individual artist or composition can ever be directly given proper attribution. However in aggregate they create the genres and styles that models can imitate. The theft has already happened.
2
grahamlesterMar 28, 2026
+1
But isn't that the same for everyone whose work synthesizes a large number of influences? How is it different from what Taylor Swift does or what Beethoven used to do?
1
PolywogowyloPMar 28, 2026
+2
It’s a good question my answer may not be satisfying but as food for thought I think ultimately it comes down to scale of input and output. No human can ever listen to the entirety of music available (especially now) and no human can ever produce endless amounts of songs.
We have to work within an available scope of reference and within our capabilities which limits synthesis in a way that forces our own particular style.
This also limits the output we can have on music and as such doesn’t compete with our influences in the same way that AI generated music can.
2
mrbanvardMar 28, 2026
+2
I think the simplest solution is to make it so if AI music (or other art) is to be used for commercial purposes, then it needs to be created by a model that was only trained on music that is public domain or where the creator or rights owner has given explicit permission for its use in training.
For non commercial purposes, treat it like fan fiction style fair use.
Of course the reality of implementing that in a robust way is not simple...
2
grahamlesterMar 28, 2026
+1
I appreciate the sincerity of your response.
1
ZombiePartyBoyLivesMar 28, 2026
I call it "winning the Robot Music Game" when I successfully make it do what I want (or reasonably close). lol. I suppose it's a little weird to be good at something most people seem to hate and don't want to listen to, but it's not *for* anybody else, really. I don't talk as much since I quit drinking a dozen years ago, and I guess I've got a lot of words in me that need someplace to go...
0
ElrandraMar 28, 2026
+1
They really can't. It's hilarious.
I went and hung out with some dude and his lady, just chilling. Smoking weed, listening to music.
They are sitting here listening to AI music saying how "great" and "amazing" it was.
I was like..."You know this is AI, right?" and they were like "Naw".
Had the gemini logo in the bottom right corner of the album art even.
1
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
-8
[deleted]
-8
WhoSaidWhatNow2026Mar 28, 2026
+2
Quality consumer level cameras have had a big impact on professional photography, particularly on perceived value and revenue. There are niches that can still pay well, but many others, arguably the majority, have absolutely been impacted negatively.
2
emalvickMar 28, 2026
+2
The problem with this digital camera analogy is that a camera is only taking a photo of what the lens sees. AI is taking a prompt and then in basic terms using any music on the internet to create a new song that is nothing more than a sophisticate collage of music that has already been made.
Now, music based heavily on samples could be argued as similar, but even then a real person had to curate what was going to be sampled and mixed.
There is no creativity in AI art.
2
Late_Aardvark8125Mar 28, 2026
-1
>when people said digital cameras would kill "real" photography back in the day.
I understand what you're saying but they're not the same. Photography still requires excellent precision, perfect timing, etc. When people use AI for "art", it's not just a tool for them, it literally just does all the work for them.
And what you said about AI music being obvious that it's AI, is true at the moment. But AI is expanding rapidly. I bet by next year, AI will have advanced so much from now.
-1
that_blasted_tuneMar 28, 2026
Suno ad
0
cerealOverdriveMar 28, 2026
The problem is you can make this argument for almost any technical advancement. With the typewriter what happens to people who take the time to perfect their penmanship?
The answer is the best of the best make it a career and the rest have a hobby. One neat thing about AI is it is a combination of all humans efforts. For AI to work it needs all of our knowledge so a little bit of our work lives on through the machines. It’s very communist until one company steals all our contributions to make massive profits…
0
masegesege_Mar 28, 2026
Same here but I’m afraid there’s nothing we can do about it.
(For context, I live in Asia in a country that doesn’t speak English.)
People often can’t tell the difference between AI and real music. They put it on in the background at gatherings and just let it play. With AI they can now listen to the same melody multiple times but in all different styles. And it takes seconds to make, so at some point AI music will dominate just from sheer volume.
I can’t really blame my friend for listening to AI music though. They don’t speak English so they can’t hear the mistakes. They don’t play music, so they can’t tell that it’s all fake. All they hear is a familiar melody and beat.
0
Sherman80526Mar 28, 2026
AI feels inevitable. I owned a retail shop for 17 years and being angry about Amazon didn't stop tech from making my efforts less valuable either.
If it helps, all art is derivative. Doesn't mean original thought and creation isn't possible, but so much of what we do and make is built on the shoulders of those who came before us. Imagine if every artist had to learn music by banging two rocks together. AI is just taking what we've collectively created and putting it together quicker than humanly possible. Hopefully the human element that can actually distill that into something of cultural value continues to be appreciated. I don't think the human mind can well handle feeling irrelevant.
0
strangerzeroMar 28, 2026
I think AI can be a great tool for artists, film makers and musicians. It’s the-very beginning there’s still a lot of problems with the tools but it will get better.
0
Late_Aardvark8125Mar 28, 2026
+1
you missed my point. thats why i hate it so much.
1
kiwicutierMar 28, 2026
ai music is just vibes without the struggle. you put in 4 years, suno puts in 4 minutes. hits different when you know the work behind the sound
0
MadRoboticistMar 28, 2026
I think something needs to be done about AI stealing artist's work, but I also think we need to be realistic. Even if something is done about IP theft, AI is a real tool. It would be foolish to act as if it doesn't or shouldn't exist. It's simply a reality that artists are going to have to adapt to new tools that are available
0
DigitalDaydreamers1Mar 28, 2026
-5
Cope
-5
Late_Aardvark8125Mar 28, 2026
+4
no wonder your posts are hidden
4
ImInTheMealDealMar 28, 2026
-2
Gobshite slop
-2
Late_Aardvark8125Mar 28, 2026
-1
huh?
-1
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
-12
[deleted]
-12
Plain_ZeroMar 28, 2026
+5
I will literally never use AI. It’s a f****** affront to humanity and it will only ever be used to replace human ingenuity.
5
stev_mempersMar 28, 2026
+9
What do you mean "most of us," kemosabe?
9
Disastrous-Ruin8411Mar 28, 2026
-10
Most of us as in the people who make up reality.
According to Deezer over a 3rd of their monthly music uploads are AI. According to another study the percent of internet traffic that are bots is higher than the traffic created by humans. Ya'll can downvote me all you want, I'm mad about it too, but reality shows that humans, especially 'artists' are using AI obsessively.
I'll downvote myself on this one.
-10
stev_mempersMar 28, 2026
+1
No, it's grifters. They're just out for a quick buck.
78 Comments