Glad to know that Ian McKellen is just a horny Listnookor like everyone else here.
110
Prestigious-Ad-28764 days ago
+19
I mean honestly maybe he doesn't follow the news.
I didn't read the article so if it opens with, "now I know the news of late" then yeah, but this guy is like 80, maybe he doesn't know
19
Super9013 days ago
+7
Oh he knows. He’s a lovely politician is what.
7
spicychickentendr4 days ago
+51
Brian Cox, come fight our Uncle Ian. He's acting up.
51
Hangry_Howie4 days ago
+19
We sure he didnt meet Stephen Tyler and get confused?
19
Quis-Custodiet3 days ago
+28
Nobody's accused Stephen Tyler of being in "good form" for decades
28
StoriesandStones3 days ago
+4
More like “holy shit he’s still alive.”
4
Gucci_Unicorns3 days ago
+14
I highly doubt that Ian McKellen at 86 years old spent a significant amount of tracking Johnny Depp’s court case and life other than - “oh he won? Swell!”
14
mostlygroovy3 days ago
+17
He didn’t win in GB
17
Strong-Investment8420 hr ago
He won in us
0
swrrrrg3 days ago
+3
I’d have loved to see Tim Burton do A Christmas Carol.
3
[deleted]4 days ago
-28
[removed]
-28
AlanWakeLover4 days ago
+41
It means he acted really well in the movie
41
[deleted]4 days ago
-24
[removed]
-24
[deleted]4 days ago
-12
[removed]
-12
[deleted]3 days ago
+9
[removed]
9
[deleted]3 days ago
[removed]
0
[deleted]3 days ago
+4
[removed]
4
[deleted]3 days ago
-4
[removed]
-4
Regular_Jim0814 days ago
-47
It makes sense,
At 86 he Ian grew up in a time where domestic abuse was much more common.
-47
nostalgiamancer_1 day ago
+1
Man, shut the actual f*** up and go contribute something of value to humanity.
1
Rski7654 days ago
-26
Didn’t Depp win in court?
-26
Regular_Jim0814 days ago
+45
No, neither of them did.
Just the second of two civil suits, in two countries, that confirmed that he choked out his wife - 22 years his Junior.
45
NoTitleChamp3 days ago
+20
No, despite people who treated it like a tv show or sports game insistence, thats not what happened.
20
Rski7653 days ago
-9
Looked like he won, but hey ho
-9
JeyneDough3 days ago
+16
Yeah, it looked that way because they chose a state with terrible SLAPP laws and made it a media circus, he was a better actor, more well liked, especially by the people and bots who pushed that narrative.
16
Hyperbolicalpaca2 days ago
+1
Well he didn’t win UK, and despite what people desperately want to believe a US court ruling differently doesn’t have any bearing on ours…
And though he did win the US, it was appealed, and he settled, meaning that that ruling doesn’t really matter iirc
1
LooseSeal884 days ago
+18
Oh my God, not this again
18
Prestigious-Ad-28764 days ago
-9
Watched an hour of that trial and I know both of them were two massive steaming piles.
-9
Rski7653 days ago
-7
I’m sure they are both reprehensible, but the question is who won the trial. It looked like Depp clearly did.
-7
Prestigious-Ad-28763 days ago
-3
A guilty man is tried on all counts, just because they go after the bigger crime doesn't mean the others were not committed.
-3
HappyHarry-HardOn4 days ago
-11
He won on the court of law - but not in the court of Listnook
-11
Hyperbolicalpaca2 days ago
+4
He also lost in a court of law lol
He is legally a wife beater
4
SwingKey35994 days ago
+15
after losing the first trial he decided to get another in the united states using a lower burden of proof in a state that had lax SLAPP laws.
basically, claiming that he won the lawsuit is like claiming that you won a game of super Mario kart against your friend at the sleep over when actually you had to go to your house and have your brother beat your friend for you.
15
[deleted]3 days ago
-12
[deleted]
-12
SwingKey35993 days ago
+7
what it means is in the beginning half of my comment…
holy shit america is cooked
40 Comments