· 160 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 16, 2026 at 6:29 PM

ICE agent charged with assault by Minnesota prosecutors, arrest warrant issued

Posted by NomadStar45

ICE agent charged with assault by Minnesota prosecutors, arrest warrant issued
CNBC
ICE agent charged with assault by Minnesota prosecutors, arrest warrant issued
Minnesota state prosecutors continue to investigation the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal agents in Minneapolis.
🚩 Report this post

160 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
IrishPorpoise Apr 16, 2026 +3786
Great, arrest this thug and send him to prison for a long time.
3786
Dandan0005 Apr 16, 2026 +1985
And if pointing a gun is a crime, when do we get charges against the ones who not only pointed but shot and murdered an innocent woman and VA nurse?
1985
IrishPorpoise Apr 16, 2026 +674
Ask the DOJ to let MN prosecutor have access to the case file.
674
mountaindoom Apr 16, 2026 +540
We have the videos. Proof enough for court. F*** the files they're hiding.
540
WeirdIndividualGuy Apr 16, 2026 +252
This, regular citizens get put away for less. It's frustrating when prosecutors try to make a case be absolutely perfect/air-tight despite all the evidence that already exists without the DOJ
252
longlivenewsomflesh Apr 16, 2026 +104
Two different justice systems with two entirely different standards
104
cecilkorik Apr 16, 2026 +55
We are going to change the standards. We are going to start by demanding they change with incandescent public outrage. We will not stop there, we will not stop until there are better standards. I think people have had enough of this shit.
55
longlivenewsomflesh Apr 17, 2026 +11
I hope so but americans are probably the most complacent first worlders who literally won't do anything actually meaningful (i.e. not just holding signs) until their comforts are directly affected, and not in a "sir how dare you" way but like "this is existential"
11
BookusWorkus Apr 17, 2026 +8
It's because we have no social safety nets. We're basically all just one or two paychecks away from complete ruin.
8
imperial1s Apr 16, 2026 +3
For less is quite an understatement
3
[deleted] Apr 16, 2026 +20
[deleted]
20
Difficult_Pea_2216 Apr 16, 2026 +15
I don't know what you read that sounded like "you can't be charged for the same crime by both state and feds" but you definitely misunderstood what was being explained to you. The issue here is claims of acting under official duty, which is hard to be challenged at all.
15
bros402 Apr 16, 2026 +22
> the federal and state governments can’t both charge someone for the same offense. Wrong. Dual sovereignty doctrine allows you to be charged both federal and state.
22
fresh-dork Apr 17, 2026 +10
yes they can. if state and federal govts both have jurisdiction, you can get popped twice
10
WeirdIndividualGuy Apr 16, 2026 +27
Sounds like one of those legal things where you just do it anyway until a judge says otherwise. If it doesn't work out, the outcome is the same: the ICE agent doesn't get prosecuted. Thus, the state would have nothing to lose from pursuing charges, especially if the feds aren't actually charging the ICE agent
27
AuroraFinem Apr 16, 2026 +12
This is how you get the charges dismissed with prejudice where it can’t be retried. Judges hate when prosecutors try to work around the system like this, but who knows if they would decide differently given this administration. It also risks the judgement getting appealed due to procedural violations, which would likely be successful, considering the DoJ would probably side with the defense. Protection from double jeopardy is a great thing that we take for granted that many other countries don’t have, but it’s also the reason our prosecutors are so calculated with filing charges. You only have 1 shot and even a retrial or dismissal result could be assigned prejudice by the judge to not allow another shot even without a verdict.
12
FreeUsePolyDaddy Apr 17, 2026 +6
Not seeing a practical disadvantage of "maybe can't retry the case" versus the status quo of "the case will never be tried".
6
HarveysBackupAccount Apr 17, 2026 +2
but is it worth waiting until another administration's DoJ is operating?
2
WeirdIndividualGuy Apr 16, 2026 +10
Again, if the outcome is the same, then you have nothing to lose from trying. The state does nothing and lets the DoJ “handle” it: nothing happens The state prosecutes anyway and gets blocked/thrown out by a judge: nothing happens (worse case scenario) Might as well try
10
Musiclover4200 Apr 16, 2026 +13
Yeah you'd think if judges hate prosecutors working around the system they'd hate the DOJ just ignoring or breaking the system entirely way more Faith in the courts is already pretty much at an all time low thanks to scrotus and all the federalist society sycophant appointments, so it would seem more important than ever for judges to show no one is above the law especially in such an overt case.
13
Hillary4SupremeRuler Apr 17, 2026 +2
I'd much rather they wait until a Democratic administration's DOJ is in power to try and actually get an airtight case (which is kinda important *for a murder charge)* instead of rushing it so people can get instant gratification emotionally and having it fail and then double jeopardy gets applied.
2
Actus_Rhesus Apr 17, 2026 +4
That’s actually not true. State and federal does not violate double jeopardy. Happens all the time especially in CSAM cases.
4
ClownholeContingency Apr 17, 2026 +2
**This is not true.** Both state and federal governments can prosecute you for the same criminal act under the dual sovereignty doctrine.
2
37285 Apr 17, 2026 +3
They can do it under the The Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine per Gamble v. United States. I think the real issue the state is having issues with is they can't get access to any of the evidence or information they need to move forward. The DOJ can stonewall and obstruct only for so long. Murder has no statue of limitations and the DOJ wont always be so hostile. They can't delay justice forever.
3
ShittingOutPosts Apr 17, 2026 +3
Serious question, what’s in the files that’s preventing the state prosecutors from moving forward? Are they just using this as an excuse to remain silent? I agree with you…the videos all over the internet seem damning.
3
wanderingpeddlar Apr 17, 2026 +3
I am going to guess that it is a combination of the Federal DOJ stating they are going to go after any prosecutor that even *trys* to prosecute an ICE member. And a lack of support from their bosses. Although I don't have proof of the support or lack their of from their bosses
3
o8Stu Apr 17, 2026 +3
Tulsi Gabbard just referred a criminal complaint to the DOJ against the whistleblower that reported Trump's attempt to extort Zelensky into announcing an investigation of Joe Biden (the call that resulted in Trump's first impeachment). They're very clearly trying to have a chilling effect on anyone who would even think about trying to hold this admin or any appendages, accountable.
3
seanpbnj Apr 16, 2026 +9
You guys are the top 1% (being literal, not throwing shade <3 )
9
CaterpillarJungleGym Apr 16, 2026 +36
I understand that you think it's privileged to ask for justice. But that shouldn't be the case. We should all be striving for it otherwise this is a lawless society
36
Faxon Apr 16, 2026 +18
I don't think that's what they're saying, I think they're saying it in a way of "you're the best people", not "you're the wealthiest and most powerful people"
18
angmar2805 Apr 16, 2026 +24
Every comment above theirs is from a “Top 1% Commenter.”
24
Star_____walker Apr 16, 2026 +6
This is it.
6
EEpromChip Apr 16, 2026 +3
Even worse than lawless; multi-tiered law society. Those lucky enough to have wealth can see a very different law than those born without, or God forbid being born a different skin color...
3
Sc0nnie Apr 16, 2026 +11
MN does not actually need US DOJ’s participation. They can build their own case with the plentiful evidence.
11
Mwahaha_790 Apr 16, 2026 +4
why? multiple videos exist.
4
Budget-Tadpole7520 Apr 16, 2026 +73
And for folks who got beat up, torn from their cars, homes, tear gased directly in the face, robbed of their phones, documents and safety.
73
boot2skull Apr 16, 2026 +31
I can’t believe enough people aren’t asking “why are immigration agents beating and killing people, and US citizens at that.” It’s just ridiculous for immigration to be “policed” this way. They’re gestapo.
31
Mixer-3007 Apr 16, 2026 +5
> They’re gestapo. nope, they are SA / [Sturmabteilung](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung) - https://youtu.be/G-6I1bnSWyg Gestapo is a "political police", same shit that FBI did with [Operation CHAOS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_CHAOS) and [COINTELPRO](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO)
5
eeyore134 Apr 16, 2026 +29
And the ones who threw flash grenades out of their moving vehicle at another moving vehicle for filming them? Or the ones who did the drive-by on that woman in Chicago who dared report where they were on social media. The list goes on and on.
29
Consistent-Throat130 Apr 16, 2026 +6
Brandishing is a crime.  Merely the threat of a weapon being used, while initiating a confrontation, is brandishing.  By this logic, of course, every cop is committing the crime of brandishing any time they engage in even a traffic stop ...  But honestly, they kind of are and we shouldn't have the same people in charge of violent crime as we have in charge of speeding tickets 
6
fabulousMFingHen Apr 17, 2026 +2
Unlawfully pointing a gun is illegal.
2
dasunt Apr 16, 2026 +31
It'll probably not be a long time - brandishing is a crime, but it looks like this would be a seven year max penalty, and if this is his first offense, it is likely to be much shorter. If he pleads it down, looks like 90 - 364 days is more likely.
31
withoutapaddle Apr 16, 2026 +48
But this isn't brandishing. The report I read said the charges were assault with a deadly weapon. He pointed it at bystanders. Brandishing is just making it visible (with intent to scare, basically). Assault with a deadly weapon is much more serious.
48
dasunt Apr 16, 2026 +5
Seven years is the max penalty for assault with a deadly weapon.
5
[deleted] Apr 16, 2026 +46
[removed]
46
AnewTest Apr 16, 2026 +17
Toss him into one of their camps. See how long he lasts surrounded by the people he brutalized.
17
AaronTheElite007 Apr 16, 2026 +1320
Which one? There have been many
1320
Lucius-Halthier Apr 16, 2026 +900
Gregory Donnell Morgan Jr., apparently he pointed a gun at people as he drove by the Feb 5. My only worry is that this regime will just move him to an ICE friendly state and keep him out of reach of that warrant
900
ExZowieAgent Apr 16, 2026 +309
That’s exactly what’s going to happen. Either Texas or Florida.
309
alwayzstoned Apr 16, 2026 +150
I listened to the press conference. He’ll have to stay there or risk getting picked up and sent to MN. Not a fun thing to have hanging over your head for who knows how long.
150
Bagellord Apr 16, 2026 +90
Depending on what he's charged with, he could be classified as a prohibited person (cannot possess firearms). Wonder how that would affect his ability to do his job...
90
McFragatron Apr 16, 2026 +64
You're making a big assumption that the pigs down there will actually cooperate with Minnesota. He's going to be sheltered and protected by the federal and other state governments, guarantee it.
64
3riversfantasy Apr 16, 2026 +32
They will absolutely threaten to arrest and prosecute any LEO that attempts to cooperate with the state of MN I can guarantee that.
32
T-homas-paine Apr 16, 2026 +26
I thought it’s federal law that the states have to cooperate with arrest warrants from other states? Iirc, ianal, etc.
26
patsfreak27 Apr 16, 2026 +9
Politicized executive DOJ wouldn't prosecute one of their own (states)
9
DelightMine Apr 16, 2026 +10
And who would be enforcing that federal law?
10
alwayzstoned Apr 16, 2026 +14
That’s why I said he’ll have to stay there. There will be other states that may be willing to cooperate. He should probably stay out of California.
14
Opheltes Apr 16, 2026 +41
> Not a fun thing to have hanging over your head for who knows how long. Minn. sec § 628.26 says statute of limitations is tolled (paused) while he’s outside the state So pretty much the rest of his life.
41
Miguel-odon Apr 16, 2026 +29
Statute of limitations is usually for indictment. Once he's indicted, it stops running. He's already been charged.
29
alwayzstoned Apr 16, 2026 +12
I didn’t know that. Even better.
12
Westo454 Apr 17, 2026 +8
The thing is that now that the warrant is issued, he’s a fugitive from justice. The Statute of Limitations clock is stopped until he is either arrested or turns himself in. He can hide in Florida or Texas for the rest of the Trump Administration, but as soon as someone else is in power the feds can pick him up and haul him to Minnesota to face justice.
8
jaylw314 Apr 16, 2026 +6
I'm guessing a lot of states would also have extradition agreements if he got picked up for anything else (as appears to be some of their tendency)
6
BroughtBagLunchSmart Apr 16, 2026 +28
They were all from Texas, they shipped them up there because they know Texans are champing at the bit to kill citizens. It was like what the Chinese did in Tiananmen square in 1989, import barely literate stormtroopers who would be more likely to murder protesters. The only positive part was they had no idea how to walk around in winter conditions and those fat fucks kept eating shit and falling down when they were trying to assault and murder citizens.
28
Dumpsterfire_47 Apr 16, 2026 +15
Can’t keep it up forever. 
15
pay_the_cheese_tax Apr 16, 2026 +8
Then that's what happens, and we'll get information on who's harboring them, so they face justice when things turn around. Sometimes Justice is very slow
8
boxofdem0ns Apr 16, 2026 +3
Molotovs have been born in Texas recently. you'd be surprised how diverse the state is despite being ruby red for 30 years.
3
RichardEpsilonHughes Apr 16, 2026 +32
They will, but Minnesota isn't going to forget about this for a long time. He's made enemies.
32
EJoule Apr 17, 2026 +2
It might be a few years, but eventually he’ll be at a traffic stop and they’ll see he’s got an active arrest warrant.
2
Medivacs_are_OP Apr 16, 2026 +18
Sounds like a job for: DOG THE BOUNTY HUNTERRRRR
18
klezart Apr 16, 2026 +17
Nah, Dog is a Trumper too, obviously.
17
Medivacs_are_OP Apr 16, 2026 +4
aw damn....
4
myrevenge_IS_urkarma Apr 16, 2026 +9
$20 is $20.  It would be funny as hell to have ICE turning in other ICE for the cash before this is all over, and I would not be surprised.
9
TSB_1 Apr 16, 2026 +3
More like Lt Aldo Raines.
3
HIM_Darling Apr 16, 2026 +4
He would have to avoid any blue cities/counties within those states as well. If he was in Texas, and got picked up in Dallas or Austin, they could hold him for extradition to MN.
4
Goodeyesniper98 Apr 16, 2026 +2
Doesn’t matter. If he’s stopped by local police in any state, they’re required to arrest him anywhere if Minnesota is willing to extradite.
2
ExpertExpert Apr 16, 2026 +2
sounds like the florida concentration camp that has been disappearing 1000+ people is about to get another honor guard
2
quixoticVigil Apr 16, 2026 +50
Well, if you arrest all of them, you're sure to get the worst of the worst, right?
50
JDC4654 Apr 16, 2026 +5
Read the article
5
AaronTheElite007 Apr 16, 2026 +24
You missed the point. There have been multiple agents that have done this with no charges being brought. One is a good start to show the population that laws still matter. If they don’t, well… there have already been a couple of incidents lately
24
Nerd_vader Apr 16, 2026 +7
They know the answer is in the attached article so it’s weird to ask. It’s like if I got a work email that says “see attached” and I reply “just tell me what it says”
7
SparklingLimeade Apr 17, 2026 +4
Asking the question is a rhetorical way to point out that a first warrant is only a first step in a very large process.
4
showhorrorshow Apr 17, 2026 +2
Sounds like we work in the same place.
2
WooperCultist Apr 16, 2026 +5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question
5
seedless0 Apr 16, 2026 +2
And just assault? Why isn't it murder?
2
elephant35e Apr 16, 2026 +356
Good. These shitty humans are more dangerous than illegals and need to be punished!
356
ElliotNess Apr 17, 2026 +55
on average, US citizens are more dangerous than "illegals," and US citizens aren't, on average, very dangerous at all.
55
sephkane Apr 17, 2026 +26
The amount of crime committed by illegal immigrants is so insignificant that stopping that crime wouldn't change our lives much at all. But making it a political talking point deflects from the fact that taxing the rich and taking money out of politics *would* change our lives, drastically, for the better. So, if you're rich, you'd want to buy a news organization and make them fear monger so the citizens would be afraid and angry at the insignificant crime so they'd forget about taxing the rich and taking money out of politics to better their lives.
26
no_one_likes_u Apr 16, 2026 +157
It’s a shame we’ll probably never be able to prosecute them for the crimes they committed while working, but at least we can hold them accountable for the crimes they commit off duty. Love the tidbit in the article that a state trooper told the couple the ice agent pointed a gun at that he was a federal agent.  As if that excuses anything, why wasn’t he arrested then and there?  Fire that trooper while you’re at it.
157
Federal_Studio5935 Apr 16, 2026 +60
Trump isn't forever. Don't forget anything. Our day will come.
60
Daratirek Apr 17, 2026 +6
Like the Democrats have any spine to do anything. They've been letting shit cops get away with about anything forever too. This isn't a left vs right issue. Its separate justice systems at work and its not gonna change after Trump is gone.
6
crybannanna Apr 17, 2026 +2
Honestly think they are waiting on some charges for when there is not a crooked DOJ. Right now, charging these people is a legal quagmire, and if a murder charge is lost it is lost for good. But, if they wait until the DOJ isn’t full of loons, and crooks, then they would be able to charge unimpeded. And murder has no statute of limitations. I don’t think kidnapping does either.
2
CatsAreMajorAssholes Apr 16, 2026 +4
Why can't we prosecute them for crimes they committed?
4
ExpertExpert Apr 16, 2026 +19
see: pam bondi she has a court order to show up to testify under oath, but decided she doesn't have to do that because she is no longer the attorney general. she thinks this because the COVER LETTER on the legal court summons said "pam bondi, attorney general". even though the real legal document after the cover letter summons her by name, not role. she did not show up to testify, so now the house of representatives will hold a "vote" to see if they can charge her criminally for skipping court, just like if you or me decided to not show up to court. "vote" is in quotes because mike johnson, speaker of the house, has veto powers. no matter what the outcome of the "vote" is from our elected officials, mike johnson gets the final say. democracy, right?
19
CatsAreMajorAssholes Apr 16, 2026 +10
But you still haven't explained why states can't go after ICE agents for crimes.
10
twisty125 Apr 16, 2026 +6
It's like when you're playing tag and then the person you're chasing goes into their house, like there's not much you can do at that point.
6
conman228 Apr 16, 2026 +2
They are federal agents the state can charge them but then the agents can ask for a change of venue to a federal court and then we all know how the DOJ will handle the matter
2
Projektdb Apr 17, 2026 +2
They can and will get the case removed to federal court, but the DoJ is then the defense. The state is still the prosecutor and the law is still state law.
2
AltDS01 Apr 16, 2026 +5
DOJ not involved. State Prosecutors continues prosecution of state laws in federal court. But it's a high bar to overcome the supremacy clause immunity that federal agents have.
5
dseanATX Apr 17, 2026 +2
The DOJ becomes involved once a federal law enforcement officer removes a state criminal case to federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1442. Also part of the DOJ's *Touhy* regulations.
2
AltDS01 Apr 17, 2026 +2
Correct about 28 usc 1442, but it is the state the continues the prosecution, not the DOJ. As we saw with the Sterling case out of Grand Rapids MI, it was Michigan v Keely, not US V Keely. The Ruby Ridge Sniper is another example. Case was prosecuted by Idaho. (Dismissed on Supremacy clause grounds in District Court, but that was later overturned on appeal, clearing the way for the criminal trial, but elections happened and the state prosecutor changed, and Dismissed the charges) [The Samuel Sterling Case](https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/judge-drops-case-against-michigan-detective-who-hit-killed-samuel-sterling) [Federal Court Opinion on Dismissal](https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69093311/109/michigan-state-of-v-keely/) Touhy seems to deal with subpoenaing a federal agency. Calling the passenger in the ICE vehicle would fall under this, but the subpoena would come from a federal court, on the request of the state.
2
Projektdb Apr 17, 2026 +2
This is correct. The state is still prosecuting and the case is still tried under state law.
2
frozenpissglove Apr 16, 2026 +2
Qualified Immunity - that shit stretches so far that it keeps most bad cops that commit crimes from seeing the inside of a jail cell.
2
dseanATX Apr 17, 2026 +2
States can't prosecute federal law enforcement acting in the course and scope of their duties. In re Neagle (1890). If this person ever gets arrested and into court (unlikely), a federal court gets to decide if he is immune from prosecution or not. None of this should be read as approval of ICE actions, just a description of the current legal framework.
2
Crrrystal Apr 16, 2026 +42
May this be the first of many arrest warrants. >The ICE agent, Gregory Donnell Morgan Jr., \[...\] Luckily, CNBC published his name so we can all remember it :) needle d*** ICE turds shouldn't be allowed to wander in society after this shit
42
Downtown-Elena Apr 16, 2026 +95
it’s kinda wild seeing the same type of story pop up over and over… i remember thinking these were rare cases but now it feels like every other week there’s something new 😬
95
PurpleSailor Apr 16, 2026 +36
Almost as frequent as Jan 6th'ers getting arrested for doing cho mo c*** after being pardoned.
36
FillFrontFloor Apr 16, 2026 +2
It shouldn't be surprising. Many of these people are ex military or people that wanted to be cops. If you ever meet or know someone that went to training drills these people are treated like c***. It's no excuse but when you go into boot camp being mistreated by an a****** calling that "discipline" some people come out of there excited for their chance to be an a****** as well since they have first hand experience at their superior officers being a d*** and happy about others treating each other like assholes. I can already imagine the person that trains these people are exactly like them or a lot worse. They aren't train public discipline, courtesy or respect. Just that there is a pecking order.
2
FeatherShard Apr 16, 2026 +79
ICE thug in question to be reassigned to Virginia in 3... 2... 1...
79
Etzell Apr 16, 2026 +35
Better arrest him quick so Virginia has two things to endlessly whine about.
35
thejimbo56 Apr 16, 2026 +30
We’re keeping the flag.
30
unholyswordsman Apr 16, 2026 +8
They should dye it rainbow and fly it.
8
RandomSecurityGuard Apr 16, 2026 +10
As you should.
10
Se7en_speed Apr 16, 2026 +13
The current government of Virginia would probably hand him over
13
FeatherShard Apr 16, 2026 +3
Texas then, whatever. Point is the feds won't let justice be done here.
3
say592 Apr 16, 2026 +4
Statute of limitations doesn't apply if someone is a fugitive. Someday they will lose their protection.
4
FireworkFuse Apr 16, 2026 +42
One almost down, thousands and thousands to go.
42
pabo81 Apr 16, 2026 +17
This case should be difficult for the DOJ to defend… these agents were not engaged in any law enforcement action, they pulled a gun on someone they were road raging with and then drove away. So lock em up and make sure these thugs can’t just walk around with impunity because they feel empowered by the administration.
17
Butters5768 Apr 16, 2026 +27
Still no charges for the public executions of Renée Good and Alex Pretti? Cool cool cool cool.
27
Wezzleey Apr 16, 2026 +19
That's because the DOJ is withholding evidence, holding up those investigation. Because of the circumstances, this investigation was done entirely locally, and enough evidence was found to bring charges without federal assistance.
19
bytosai2112 Apr 16, 2026 +8
None of this matters until he is actually convicted. Even then it’s a bandaid on a giant f****** gaping chest wound.
8
Fresh-Birdshit Apr 16, 2026 +16
What about 2 murder charges for the ya know …. Murdered US citizens.
16
Epicfro Apr 16, 2026 +3
Should have just arrested him without announcing it. Easier to deal with once in custody then giving him a chance to hide.
3
Eastern_Hornet_6432 Apr 16, 2026 +9
Please please PLEASE set this precedent. Nobody is above the law.
9
MBSMD Apr 17, 2026 +3
Why is this the first arrest warrant for one of these guys?
3
CatsAreMajorAssholes Apr 16, 2026 +6
Someone please use a flock camera to find him for maximum poetic justice.
6
fiftyfivepercentoff Apr 16, 2026 +9
Good. Release the Epstein files!
9
So_spoke_the_wizard Apr 16, 2026 +8
>ICE should make arrangements for him to turn himself in F*** no! ICE should arrest him because there's a warrant. Acting on warrants is literally part of ICE's job.
8
TryNotToAnyways2 Apr 17, 2026 +3
Here is what Fox News has to say about it.......Nothing! [https://www.foxnews.com/search-results/search#q=Gregory%20Donnell%20Morgan](https://www.foxnews.com/search-results/search#q=Gregory%20Donnell%20Morgan)
3
HoldOnDearLife Apr 16, 2026 +7
I will be shocked if the police do their job and arrest the person with a warrant like they should. Please keep us updated.
7
Janky_Pants Apr 17, 2026 +2
So we are arresting the ones for sexual assault but not the ones for murder?
2
Ok-Alarm7257 Apr 17, 2026 +2
He's on assignment somewhere, we'll let him know
2
BS623-902 Apr 17, 2026 +2
Justice is coming, slow and steady
2
-ImJustSaiyan- Apr 17, 2026 +7
Good, now go after the ones who murdered Renée Good and Alex Pretti. And all the other ICE agents who have committed blatant domestic terrorism.
7
ThermalDeviator Apr 17, 2026 +2
The DOJ DHS and Noem and Bondi should be charged with accessories afer the fact to murder. They took all the evidence and the killer and hid them.
2
CatsAreMajorAssholes Apr 16, 2026 +4
Gregory Donnell Morgan Jr. is about to be on the business end of a felony stop this time. Remember cops- he's armed and dangerous.
4
Lacarpetronn Apr 17, 2026 +4
What about the two murderers?
4
360walkaway Apr 17, 2026 +3
Pre-emptive spoiler: not guilty.
3
Wayofchinchilla Apr 16, 2026 +3
The perp walk should be down Main Street for all the cameras to see and the charges absolutely need to be state so little orange boy Can't pardon.
3
trsmash Apr 16, 2026 +2
What are the odds the orange turd just issues some blanket pardon for ICE?
2
Projektdb Apr 17, 2026 +5
Can't pardon state crimes.
5
emaw63 Apr 16, 2026 +4
Good! Love to see some accountability. And it's good that it's a state level prosecution because it means Trump can't pardon it
4
Bizarrebazaars Apr 17, 2026 +3
They did SO MUCH of this psycho unhinged aggressive shit.  Point guns at peaceful protesters. Choose one random out of a lineup for no reason and all rush, tackle, and detain them. Turn down the wrong street where a group of ICE agents happened to be? Immediately surrounded and harassed, questioned, given different conflicting commands to confuse the driver, then break their windows to forcefully remove occupants to detain them for no reason.  ICE creates random car accidents to blame the other driver, then removes and arrests them, then steals their car and switches license plates to continue to terrorize the city. They drive at unsafe speeds, go the wrong way down one way streets, run red lights, blow through stop signs, and more.  They would be slipping all over the ice in Minneapolis wintertime, then get up and tackle the nearest person to blame for “tripping them.” Racially profile people (including minors) for no other reason just to harass, tackle, assault, steal their papers and phones, then dump them off many miles away. Go knocking door to door, sometimes kicking front doors down and invading with force.  Tear-gassing children and infants. Shoot and kill people who were not a true threat to them. RIP Good & Pretti. ICE are f****** terrorist pigs. [Federal officials said in public statements during the surge that they targeted the “worst of the worst.” Agency officials in early February reported agents had made more than 4,000 arrests during what they called Operation Metro Surge, including “murderers, pedophiles, rapists, gang members and terrorists.”  But the new data shows fewer than one-quarter of those arrested had a criminal conviction on their record. A little more than 13 percent of those arrested had pending criminal charges.](https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/03/31/ice-arrests-in-minnesota-three-quarters-of-arrestees-had-no-criminal-record-data-shows) [(Stephen) Miller demanded that federal agents be dispatched to certain areas of Minneapolis in order to “force confrontations” with anti-ICE protesters, two senior DHS sources told the Daily Mail. Miller repeatedly urged federal agents to engage with protesters in order to win a “PR battle,” one official told the outlet. He told officials that anti-ICE could not be viewed as successful, and repeatedly said that demonstrators “need to be vanquished by any force necessary,”](https://newrepublic.com/post/208362/stephen-miller-orders-ice-alex-pretti-death)
3
SubstantialPressure3 Apr 16, 2026 +3
I swear, it seems like they chose and hired the lowest common denominators of humanity.
3
wolfmanpraxis Apr 16, 2026 +7
notice how we havent heard much about "The Base" and "The Proud Boys" until fairly recently? They all joined ICE...so they can legally terrorize minorities and "libruls" I'm fairly sure the reason why Trump wants to overturn those Proud Boy convictions from J6 is to allow those people to serve as law enforcement in ICE / CBP.
7
SubstantialPressure3 Apr 17, 2026 +2
I don't think that would even be necessary. Apparently they aren't even completing background checks before training and giving them weapons. And who knows? They might be recruiting that type specifically. Brutalizing people simply because you can? Being gullible and not reading the fine print? Not even reading the large print? Going without a paycheck or the bonuses promised, but you're allowed to brutalize people? Abuse children, women, and men? They aren't going for anyone who has a sense of justice or fairness, and a clean record. That's pretty clear.
2
wolfmanpraxis Apr 17, 2026 +2
>I don't think that would even be necessary. I would agree knowing what we know, but I guess its more a of red-tape thing if someone decided to "audit" the hiring practices at a later date. But I know that isnt anything the Trump admin is worried about. I fear that if/when Trump leaves, a significant amount of records will disappear or never exist. You bring up some very good points. And from what I seen in videos of interactions, and reported interviews with former ICE agents; you are correct. I recall a case where a very anti-ICE anti-MAGA media influencer was accepted to the ICE Academy to see if they were doing any checks.
2
dBlock845 Apr 16, 2026 +2
Yeah but what about the ones who killed two people in cold blood?
2
Polyphiry Apr 16, 2026 +2
Honestly, they should've kept this under wraps so they weren't alerted.
2
mwkingSD Apr 16, 2026 +2
The author of this piece committed a grammar mis-demeanor. The first sentence - “An Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent has been charged with two counts of assault related to a road rage incident by state prosecutors in Minnesota” - says a road rage incident was committed by state prosecutors. I think and hope the prosecutors charged the ICE officer with two counts.
2
Warcraft_Fan Apr 16, 2026 +2
1 down, 10,000 more idiots to charge
2
ConfidentLobster2962 Apr 16, 2026 +2
Was he the clapper after shooting Alex Pretti?
2
MedicOfTime Apr 17, 2026 +2
What about all the rampant murder…?
2
PM_Your_Best_Ideas Apr 17, 2026 +2
If they weren't doing anything wrong they wouldn't need to wear masks.
2
Additional_Rich_5249 Apr 16, 2026 +2
Let’s see if anything becomes of it.
2
6ory299e8 Apr 16, 2026 +2
cool, cool... how about some murder charges? I can think of two counts off the top of my head.
2
Umedon Apr 17, 2026 +1
ICE will ignore this warrant, because most of them have never seen a warrant.
1
karlihok Apr 17, 2026 +1
About time someone holds them accountable.
1
tabrizzi Apr 16, 2026 +1
Interesting development. Who's going to arrest him?
1
Karbon_D Apr 16, 2026 +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
macross1984 Apr 17, 2026 +1
Wow, never thought I'd read a news where one of Trump's gooney is issued arrest warrant. I hope he get caught but in US, there are two form of justice. Those with money and those without money. Which one do you think will often get the upper hand?
1
← Back to Board