> Masked ICE officers broke down the door of Thao’s house in St Paul – without a warrant, according to his family – and dragged him into the street in his underwear while he clutched a blanket in sub-freezing conditions.
> Thao, a Hmong American and naturalized US citizen, said at the time that agents drove him “to the middle of nowhere” and forced him from the car in frigid weather to photograph him, before realizing their mistake and dropping him back at home almost two hours later.
This is appalling.
2643
LiamtheV4 days ago
+882
Jesus, sounds like they were going to give him the [Starlight Tour](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlight_tours) treatment
882
chibiusa404 days ago
+856
They did the same thing to a blind refugee in New York. Except [he died](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gx8l7w4jjo).
856
Robo-boogie4 days ago
+158
This one broke me when I read about it. Especially knowing that no one will be punished properly for this.
158
Integrity-in-Crisis4 days ago
+100
It did end up being ruled a homicide. So not sure exactly what will happen to the cops who left him there but it should definitely be more than the average slap on the wrist most cops get.
100
cdizzlePGA2k4 days ago
+12
Why would it be more?
12
Integrity-in-Crisis4 days ago
+26
Because normally all cops are protected via their qualified immunity. For that to work all their actions at the time in question need to be above board and meet all the standards their employment requires. A judge ruling this a homecide inherently deems what the police did with this unlawful. Then comes the investigation to determine the culpability of everyone involved. Since it's a given someone is getting in trouble at this point there's no use trying shield those involved. If there was any question it might've been someone not a cops fault they would be doing everything to protects the cops involved but no dice. So they're probably gonna get fired as a given, 50/50 if he is eligible for re-hire elsewhere. If the prosecutor can somehow prove that they left him out there maliciously they could rule it a murder. They're probably gonna work it down to manslaughter and get the minimum sentence but even that is more than what usually happens to police. I'm thinking house arrest and community service with a couple years probabtion.
26
jureeriggd4 days ago
+17
yup because after all that theatre and the cop is found guilty, his lawyers will argue that sending a cop to jail is pretty much a death sentence, and he'll get adseg (isolation) coupled with a light sentence
17
crzybstrd973 days ago
+6
Maybe the cop should've thought about that before murdering someone. No need for special treatment.
6
cdizzlePGA2k4 days ago
+4
Don’t disagree with your thoughts, just I wish I agreed with you on how this will go. I bet this person is “arrested” and then when we all forget about him, back on the streets.
4
JackDraak4 days ago
+2
I believe the "ruling" you mention is simply a coroners "finding".
2
DJKokaKola4 days ago
+53
Quite possibly the worst thing for my city to be known for internationally. =\
53
queenringlets3 days ago
+7
This happened to my dad. This was very scary back in the day of no cell phones. He could have easily died. Taught me to never trust the cops.
7
Responsible_Meal4 days ago
+2
My hometown is famous! I couldn’t believe it when I found out cops did that. That’s a long walk and it gets freaking cold there.
2
Coracoda4 days ago
+123
It’s only one story of many. They were pulling people out of vehicles and abducting them, leaving vehicles running on streets and blocking traffic. Minneapolis had to issue a towing moratorium.
123
Floreat_democratia4 days ago
+52
Where I live, cops leave vehicles running on streets when they haul people away, and it always struck me as disturbing. Why wouldn't you move the vehicle to the side and turn the engine off?
52
FlyBulky1064 days ago
+56
When you pay your cops bounties to take individuals into custody, moving the cars takes time away from the next capture.
56
PokeYrMomStanley4 days ago
+42
Because the police are not here for the benefit of the people.
Notice how different it is driving post covid? State patrol in my area made statements about how people no longer give a f*** about their authority and I couldn't fault them.
42
Floreat_democratia4 days ago
+4
I originally posted about how people were driving crazy in the early stages of the pandemic. It was as if they had forgotten everything they had learned and had only driven once in their entire life.
4
PokeYrMomStanley4 days ago
+5
I was driving 100-200 miles daily a couple days a week and it was a f****** ghost town on the freeways. People seemed to eventually forget that other people were also on the road even though there werent nearly as many other people. A couple more years and people are going to really start to reflect on the covid years.
5
Kabbooooooom3 days ago
+2
I’ve never given a f*** about their authority because, as the acronym goes, I haven’t met a single cop who isn’t a b******.
2
Flyflymisterpowers4 days ago
+368
Yep... sorry if ICE breaks down my door im treating it has a threat to my life and dealing with it as such.. This is insane.
368
theknyte4 days ago
+197
People have been found not-guilty shooting cops who conduct no knock warrants and such.
Castle Doctrine is not completely off the table. If someone invades your home and doesn't identify themselves, then it's fair game to defend yourself, I say.
197
droans4 days ago
+159
At least where I live (Indiana), our Castle Doctrine explicitly allows you to use force against LEOs if they don't identify themselves before entering your home.
Which, honestly, is how no-knock warrants should work. The homeowner should be allowed to treat you as an armed, dangerous intruder if the police don't clearly and plainly identify yourself. That's the inherent risk of breaking into someone's house.
159
IIOrannisII4 days ago
+86
The problem is, saying "this is the police" doesn't actually identify you at all
86
Blueberryburntpie4 days ago
+63
Assuming you survive the encounter.
Years ago I read about a no-knock that ended in a shootout. Something along the lines of a husband (innocent) and a deputy sheriff were shot dead (by the husband's pissed off wife who went guns blazing when her husband was shot). All because they had the wrong address.
And then there was this no-knock warrant that ended in a baby getting their face blown off by a flashbang grenade (NSFW photo of the baby): https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ex-georgia-deputy-acquitted-after-flash-bang-grenade-hurts-toddler-n479361
> Authorities were serving a late-night "no-knock" warrant on May 28, 2014, at a home where they believed Bou Bou's father's nephew, a suspected meth dealer, was staying when they lobbed a flash-bang grenade inside. The nephew wasn't home, and the grenade — designed to disorient its target — landed in Bou Bou's crib.
> Bou Bou was placed in a medically induced coma. His mother, Alecia, wrote in Salon that the grenade covered his body in burns and ripped "a hole in his chest that exposes his ribs."
63
you-create-energy4 days ago
+39
Or their latest favorite, the no warrant warrant! Surely castle doctrine will hold up.
39
heroturtle884 days ago
+46
When it comes to ICE, *even if they do identify themselves*, it's fair game.
46
piepants20014 days ago
+58
There have been cases where people impersonate ICE, complete with masks and zero identification, and have robbed their homes.
58
7ddlysuns4 days ago
+28
And raped women
28
MelangeBot4 days ago
+22
>People have been found not-guilty shooting cops who conduct no knock warrants and such.
>Castle Doctrine is not completely off the table. If someone invades your home and doesn't identify themselves, then it's fair game to defend yourself, I say.
Unfortunately when you shoot at cops it usually ends with you dying. And that's why everybody needs some drones for home defence.
22
Monteze4 days ago
+5
This type of stuff is exactly what the 2A is for, sure we are not taking on the military in conventional war but keeping *these* tyrants in fear and making it not worth their time keep us safter.
5
PeculiarAlize4 days ago
+18
Time to trade the old 12ga. home defense for some black tip 30-06 and an M1. Y'all can have my drywall but you'll never take my freedom.
18
Navydevildoc4 days ago
+8
Of all states, California has a very strong Castle Doctrine law. If you enter a home uninvited, you are automatically considered a hostile party.
8
onefst250r4 days ago
+22
Not all states have Castle doctrine laws, so, if you're reading this, make sure you understand if this applies to your specific location.
22
ragnaroksunset4 days ago
+56
Or what, they'll go to a real jail instead of an ICE detention center? People's backs are being put to the wall and they need to recognize this.
56
CanadianFerd3 days ago
+3
Honestly, if I was american, I'd rather be in jail seen as someone who killed an I.C.E. agent than in an I.C.E. detention center. The other cons might see it as a badge of honor lol
3
ragnaroksunset3 days ago
+5
You get a hero's brand *and* you get to go to the place where they might actually catch shit if you die of sepsis.
It's win/win.
5
willstr14 days ago
+27
Even if the state doesn't have it in the current political climate I wouldn't be surprised if there is jury nullification (depending on the jury pool). Just look at the DC Sandwich Hero, they couldn't even get a grand jury to charge him
27
nitid_name4 days ago
+7
You could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich, but not, apparently, the person who threw it.
7
-Saucegurlllll4 days ago
+19
It's slightly more complicated than that. You can protect yourself from home invasions in every single state. The burden of proof required to justify the use of deadly force changes depending on the state. Something like 45 states explicitly allow the use of deadly force when defending against a home invasion (with nuances between "stand your ground" and full castle doctrine that ultimately still mean "you can use deadly force in self-defense in your home"), and the other 5 have a duty to retreat before allowing the use of deadly force. And if you're being actively kidnapped, well you can't exactly retreat, so you have a full right to self-defense with deadly force.
The 4th and 2nd amendments are also generally viewed as granting strong protections in this regard.
So while you're correct that the degree of explicit permission granted by the state varies across the country, you still have a right to self defense in every state.
19
Theguest2174 days ago
+8
You may be legally right, but unless the agents you shoot at are alone, your chances of even getting a chance to sit in the court room to explain your situation are pretty slim to none. Your family might get a nice payout, but you won't be there to appreciate it.
8
wchutlknbout4 days ago
+2
Okay but then you get shot to death, not as simple a choice as you make it sound
2
Luckydog124 days ago
+38
I hear what you’re saying, but they WILL shoot and kill you. Full stop.
38
willstr14 days ago
+27
Just like the gang of criminals they are.
If they had a warrant, properly identified themselves, and followed the constitution then maybe people wouldn't feel the need to defend themselves
27
Flyflymisterpowers4 days ago
+38
I'm willing to take that chance for my freedom. Personally I'd rather go down fighting than end up in a black hole tortured and abused.
38
Daidis4 days ago
+13
Those plates ain't level 4
13
Strange-Future-64694 days ago
+3
Yup, they'll make an example of you. Half of police power is through fear.
We're basically living in Andor's world now.
3
similar_observation4 days ago
+5
Let's be frank here. Heavily armed and undertrained goons breaking into your home and meaning to do you great harm is entirely a threat to your life.
5
caninehere4 days ago
+16
If you responded appropriately to an ICE agent illegally breaking into your home you wouldn't just be in the right, you'd be a hero.
16
nat_r4 days ago
+25
Martyr, most likely, unfortunately.
25
Weak_Firefighter92474 days ago
+2
Not if your home-defense weapon is a rocket launcher
2
More_Operation_5884 days ago
+4
youd be dead
4
Flyflymisterpowers4 days ago
+1
so be it.
1
havestronaut4 days ago
+3
They’d just come back and kill you. ICE is nothing but an organized crime gang.
3
Secure-Reading72254 days ago
+7
This is complete nuts. It's disgusting and outrageous.
7
eeyore1344 days ago
+5
I'm surprised they didn't just leave him there.
5
THEsuziesunshine4 days ago
+4
In Saint Paul, like frogtown and the east side we do not play about our deeply respected hmong neighbors. This incident was so, so, outrageous.
4
Secure-Reading72254 days ago
+6
Omg thats so f****** crazy. Sounds like some thrid world war country.
6
lNFORMATlVE4 days ago
+12
Actually it sounds like nazi germany. Or soviet russia.
12
Secure-Reading72254 days ago
+8
That's scary yo. Is that what's gonna happen to us ?
8
V-nillaaaa4 days ago
+3
Been happening for a year now.
3
bwoah07_gp24 days ago
+1
And there's still people (on this platform too) who are adamant ICE is doing nothing wrong and the US isn't a safe country to live in or to visit. 🙄
1
Pour_Me_Another_1 day ago
+1
Seems like the ICE agents are the ones who need to be reined in rather than the innocent people they claim are criminals for the lolz
1
BrofessorFarnsworth4 days ago
+1484
There better be jail time for ICE out of this
1484
atfricks4 days ago
+302
They've murdered people in broad daylight, on camera, and no one has even been charged for it, let alone seen jail time.
I wouldn't hold your breath.
302
Melkman684 days ago
+25
Its possible after a change of admin though right? Thats what im hoping for
25
Thunderclone_14 days ago
+16
Mango mussolini is already talking about blanket pardons.
Unless the next administration entirely upends and rebuilds the foundations of US law, there will be no justice through the *legal* system.
16
EngineersAnon4 days ago
+7
POTUS can't pardon state crimes.
7
Thunderclone_14 days ago
+7
Correct, but federal agents have a great degree of coverage under the Supremacy Clause. When acting under their official duties, they have de facto immunity from state level prosecution.
We can argue about whether the actions of ICE are in their official duties, but with their orders coming drectly from the president and the cabinet, and a strong conservative majority in the supreme court, I doubt any decision there would overturn that.
7
atfricks4 days ago
+15
Possible, maybe. But I don't have much confidence with how much they're destroying evidence.
15
Slidje4 days ago
+11
Look at how much accountability happened last time. Look at what the Dems are doing right now. The best you can hope for is "they didn't fill out the right paperwork first" or "ICE needs more training"
11
Kana5154 days ago
+3
I mean those Jan6 guys were convicted. Just gotta make sure we keep the lunatics who'd set them free away from the Whitehouse after that.
3
OptimusSublime4 days ago
+590
Don't worry. There won't be.
590
cmcdonald224 days ago
+95
I'm just curious if it will be continued open corruption and failures of enforcement, or if it will be be the continued slow death of liberty under the guise of security and things like 'qualified immunity'.
That's really the only question.
95
Psy-Kosh4 days ago
+50
I suppose another option would be that we all collectively agree to consult Jefferson's guide to arboreal irrigation.
50
Sracer424 days ago
+8
Stealing that
Not sorry either
8
SlitScan4 days ago
+4
f*** I'm Canadian and **I'm** not sorry for stealing it.
4
Heronymous-Anonymous4 days ago
+63
It will be both.
For as long as a Republican holds office it will be open corruption and abject failure of enforcement against crimes perpetrated by the state against its own citizens.
But even if a Democrat takes office, the security state is so entrenched that it would take an entirely different Supreme Court Bench to remove qualified immunity or even trim it back to a point where law enforcement could be held accountable for their crimes committed under color of law.
63
TheRadBaron4 days ago
+9
>But even if a Democrat takes office, the security state is so entrenched that it would take an entirely different Supreme Court Bench to remove qualified immunity or even trim it back to a point
This is probably true in practice, for likely outcomes, but it's worth pointing out that it's not a fundamental truth.
This kind of entrenchment will be hard to deal with and dependent on supreme court vacancy timing, if the Dems get 50-55% of voters on their side in some key races. If there was some massive anti-corruption pivot from the American electorate that lead to Dems winning every race with 75% of the vote, accountability would be much easier and much more rapid.
Americans in recent history tend to keep their politics very close to a 50:50 ratio, which can lead to a sense that constructive political changes are always slow and moderate, but the possibility of change is dependent on how the voting goes.
9
HiddenSage4 days ago
+8
>If there was some massive anti-corruption pivot from the American electorate that lead to Dems winning every race with 75% of the vote, accountability would be much easier and much more rapid.
Opposition to corruption is so dominant in polling that you're pretty much down to the lizardman constant for people that don't want to punish corruption. The problem is that even after 15 months of MAGA 2.0, 40% of the electorate still thinks it's *Dems* who are more corrupt, because their perception is warped by dogshit news sources that hype up every instance of malfeasance occurring in a 'blue' state as proof that all Democrats are child-eating satanists.
We're not going to see that kind of massive partisan swing away from MAGA unless we get a nuclear winter - the EMP from that would at least disable all social media/algorithmic content, and being forced to live in the real world would mean any survivors have to start corroborating on the same facts again.
8
EclipseNine4 days ago
+4
> their perception is warped by dogshit news sources that hype up every instance of malfeasance occurring in a 'blue' state as proof that all Democrats are child-eating satanists.
That's part of the problem, but these dogshit "news" outlets wouldn't have a leg to stand on if the democratic party actually had a real desire to take action against corruption and could point to examples of them doing so. It's hard to convince your voters you care about stopping corruption when it's 20 years of "heal the country, reach across the aisle" every time they're handed power after campaigning on ending corruption.
4
HiddenSage4 days ago
+2
I partly agree - but I've also seen enough mountains-out-of-molehills and false-equivalency arguments from the right to know that Dem electeds would have to be literally perfect (in the actual, original meaning of the word literally), and stay that way for a decade, before a lot of those folks would listen to reason or believe such an anti-corruption campaign was anything but a "witch hunt."
2
vandon4 days ago
+5
Qualified Immunity is such bullshit if they throw out the cases that don't have clear previous rulings. The judiciary needs to say, "ok.. Qualified Immunity but we're going to continue the case to establish a clear ruling for the future."
5
ccaccus4 days ago
+7
Oops, all pardons!
7
Big-Following52074 days ago
+2
Any hope the American public can petition the international community for some kind of justice?
2
SlitScan4 days ago
+5
lol why do you think the GOP is so very anti UN, EU, NATO, ICC and is all about that American exceptionalism BS?
5
frankdaddy44 days ago
+4
If we ever have a sane president again, there will be justice, they cannot hide
4
SteveJobsDeadBody4 days ago
+24
This is what they said after Nixon, Reagan, Bush. The funny thing is there has only EVER been justice if you're rich and/or white. Ask black people in America if they ever got to see "justice" for slavery, segregation, block busting, redlining, etc. Ask if they ever got reparations like the interned Japanese eventually got.
24
IAMA_Plumber-AMA4 days ago
+10
Just like how Trump faced consequences for January 6, right?
10
turboboob4 days ago
+2
I mean, there were motivated people identifying and hunting nazis for decades after WWII. Just cause there’s no prosecution doesn’t mean we need to let them stay.
2
Coracoda4 days ago
+1
Yeah, that’s fair. If we all give up and treat it like it’s unavoidable, we’re not obligated to fight against it! Which is a relief, because I don’t want to put in effort to important things when I have shows to watch
1
Warcraft_Fan4 days ago
+1
Probably claim the citizen mis-identified himself deliberately to cause trouble.
1
meldiane813 days ago
+1
Phew! Thank god.
1
diurnal_emissions4 days ago
+17
I think bounty hunters are about to find out they aren't actually federal agents with qualified immunity.
Can't say we didn't warn them.
17
bijig4 days ago
+2
The full extent of this is becoming clear. An authoritarian state is being established, and with it the kind of corruption seen in countries with authoritarian leadership. The government supports other authoritarian leaders. Insurrectionists have already been pardoned. Agents are acting with impunity. How has ICE been able to carry on wearing masks and concealing their identity? That’s insane. It’s all a bit late.
2
RAF20183364 days ago
+1
Best we can do is a brunch march
1
gamerdudeNYC4 days ago
+1
They’ll be pardoned
1
Kabbooooooom3 days ago
+1
There better be. But there won’t be. There’s only one way this ends with justice and it will never happen again in America.
1
EmergencyCucumber9054 days ago
+194
> Masked ICE officers broke down the door of Thao’s house in St Paul – without a warrant, according to his family – and dragged him into the street in his underwear while he clutched a blanket in sub-freezing conditions.
I wonder if they mean no warrant at all, like not even for the guy they were supposedly looking for. If so then that's a pretty clear cut case.
194
papercrane4 days ago
+108
At best they probably had administrative warrants for the two men they were looking for (the family says that the men did not live there, and one of them has been in state prison since 2024 according to the NY Times.)
However, despite the name "administrative warrants" are not warrants. It's just a form that ICE agents can fill out, and doesn't allow for them to enter private homes.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/13/us/ice-minnesota-arrest-immigration-investigation.html
108
willstr14 days ago
+51
>administrative warrants
AKA toilet paper
The whole ICE terrorist organization needs to be dissolved and prosecuted
51
Shot-Swimming-90984 days ago
+20
> At best they probably had administrative warrants
Media sources need to explain and clarify this every time. A lot of people are going to read that article and come away from it thinking they are harassing ICE because ICE had a warrant that allowed them to legally arrest the victim.
20
TheCoelacanth4 days ago
+21
Presenting someone with an administrative "warrant" needs to be criminalized. It's an outright lie designed to fool people into thinking that you have a warrant when you don't.
21
StruanT4 days ago
+15
Law enforcement should just be banned from any lying and/or deception period. And no, I don't care what that means for "undercover operations" because that is usually just police inducing poor people to commit crimes they wouldn't have otherwise committed.
15
yhwhx4 days ago
+262
Good! More states should be charging ICE and CBP agents with these crimes.
262
Nandulal4 days ago
+76
lol I'll eat my hat if anyone other than the victim gets convicted
76
Space_Sweetness4 days ago
+18
Might take time but there could be justice later.
18
sternlip4 days ago
+14
The hat will be well marinated if devoured
14
Space_Sweetness4 days ago
+5
All the more reason to get engaged and vote I guess
5
No_Sherbert41434 days ago
+1
Ever seen Sing 2?
You saw how well that went.
1
[deleted]4 days ago
+1
[deleted]
1
willstr14 days ago
+2
The investigators need to tell the department of cover ups to f*** off unless they want accessory after the fact charges. Also digital, offsite, offline backups in case the terrorist get cheeky
2
Floreat_democratia4 days ago
+38
Elect Nazis, expect concentration camps.
38
GBpleaser4 days ago
+7
Yup . Classic case of Nazi see, Nazi do..
7
alexfi-re4 days ago
+5
Yes, it's tragic,
***
Taken and abused,
All the people abducted,
The owners get rich
5
Kabbooooooom4 days ago
+37
He is one of **over two hundred** American citizens that have been racially profiled and illegally detained by ICE. My wife was one of them.
She isn’t even an immigrant. She was born in North Carolina.
F*** this administration, and f*** ICE.
37
IntrepidIcicle4 days ago
+10
How did that happen?? Thats so awful I’m so sorry.
10
Kabbooooooom3 days ago
+8
Thank you. She was racially profiled and approached by ICE while she was walking to work, doing literally nothing wrong. She didn’t resist. In fact, she was terrified. She had valid ID on her, which they claimed was fake. They just kept accusing her of lying that she was born in the US. I’m sure you’ve seen videos of them doing the same thing to other Americans. Seems like their M.O.
This is inexplicable to me unless their sole goal and purpose was to terrorize a woman because she wasn’t white. But that’s not surprising when you think about how literal Neo-Nazis and Proud Boys are being allowed to join ICE, and then released on the public with zero training, oversight or consequences for their actions.
Luckily, she wasn’t detained long because these absolute morons epically screwed up and realized their racist mistake quickly. My wife is a rather high profile citizen. That job she was walking to? It was a hospital. Where she works. As a doctor.
But don’t get me wrong. The fact that this happens to ANY American citizen is some seriously fascist BS, and the fact that my wife got less of the brunt of it solely because they feared the backlash of targeting a high profile member of society who could bring a media spotlight on their racism should tell you all you need to know about ICE.
8
Efficient_Market12344 days ago
+24
I would love if ICE agents could be charged with crimes. Also, most/all people in the current administration while we're at it.
I'm sad that I'm unlikely to see it happen, certainly not to the most deserving. These people should never know happiness or peace again.
24
Cpt_Soban4 days ago
+22
Republicans spent 20 years clutching pearls over "FEMA DEATH CAMPS" "OBAMA 3RD TERM" "MARTIAL LAW"- But now as Jackboot stormtroopers drag citizens out of their homes to be thrown into camps without rights or a trial- They're silent.
22
GBpleaser4 days ago
+19
Not silent, cheering it on.
MAGA is beyond deplorable… they’ve crossed into enemy of the state territory.
19
Kabbooooooom3 days ago
+2
They literally attempted an armed insurrection. MAGAs are traitors to the Republic, because they voted for it again. Even the ones who didn’t participate - they are traitors by standing behind and supporting those who did.
2
DaveyJoe3 days ago
+3
They weren't afraid of it happening, they were afraid their perceived enemies would beat them to it.
3
Kabbooooooom3 days ago
+1
Cheering it on actually.
And it’s because those people aren’t white.
I’ve had multiple MAGAs actually admit this to me. Fuckin racist bastards, the lot of them.
1
Harry_Mud4 days ago
+64
Those ICE agents, and any other police officers that may have helped them, need to be arrested for false arrest, kidnapping, assault and battery, breaking and entering, violation of his rights...and possibly other crimes against this American...all felonies. It's time to put these asshats in prison.
64
Frigorifico4 days ago
+27
they've only ever been kidnappings
27
Bubba100004 days ago
+16
what about the two people that were killed in Minneapolis?
16
Frigorifico4 days ago
+24
good point, some of them are murders
24
Strict-Carrot47834 days ago
+13
Not surprising, ICE only hires people who are more animal than human.
13
nilecrane4 days ago
+10
I really hope somebody (ACLU?) is keeping track of all of the blatant civil rights violations and will come at these assholes when their time comes. There needs to be a reckoning!
10
USDXBS4 days ago
+7
All false arrests should be treated as kidnapping.
Know when a victim is freed from some nutjobs basement and they arrest the person who was holding them? Do the same thing with cops. The only difference is they tried to use public property to hold their victims.
7
CabSauce4 days ago
+7
How are those ICE murder investigations going?
7
drethnudrib4 days ago
+42
Sounds like they were going to kill him by leaving him abandoned in freezing temperatures. This is attempted murder, and these agents need to see hard time.
42
Ksh_6674 days ago
+29
Exactly what they did to that blind man who died. Left him in freezing temps in an area he didn't know & no way of finding his way home.
29
guttanzer4 days ago
+14
So if these were ICE agents, what were they doing enforcing sexual predators? Their remit is immigration and customs. These are both civil law, not criminal law.
Warrants for criminal violations have to be issued by a judge for probable cause. It should be simple to figure out if a judge issued a warrant, and if so, what the probable cause was. If any DHS official stonewalls on this they should be hauled into court.
14
parker10194 days ago
+7
Charge, prosecute, and incarcerate.
7
alexfi-re4 days ago
+7
They take your neighbors,
They’re abducted and vanish,
Minneapolis
**
nazis hide with masks,
Cowardly traitors afraid,
They choose violence
7
mike1948274 days ago
+6
Most arrests by ICS and the DHS nowadays could be considered kidnappings
6
YoungOverholt4 days ago
+5
I dont understand why more people aren't armed. There needs to be more severe, immediate repercussions for breaking into a citizen's home without cause or warrant.
5
ARCWuLF14 days ago
+6
Good. Kidnapping is a federal charge, and since 1994 the penalty for that can include execution by the state.
6
Vegetable_Quote_48074 days ago
+2
The trouble is that trump can (and does) pardon federal crimes.
2
ARCWuLF14 days ago
+3
Yeah, but ICE agents aren't billionaires, just racists, and Donald Trump wouldn't have anything to gain by pardoning them. Besides: He won't be in power forever, no matter what his idiot sycophants think.
3
Red1Monster4 days ago
+6
...can we also investigate the broad daylight executions ?
6
Th3FinalStarman4 days ago
+11
Congratulations to the US Taxpayer on bankrolling this guy's inevitable five figure settlement.
11
hylo234 days ago
+21
because that is EXACTALY what they did.! and MURDER. Justice for ALL not some.
21
Secure-Reading72254 days ago
+3
Why are they taking our freedoms away from us. True story I've gotten a lot of Army guys recently wanna be my friend on Facebook which is really weird. Sometimes I post about Trump on Facebook. It would be pretty bad if they are now picking people to kidnap or disappear bc they are a threat to our president. Or what they think is a threat.
3
korkythecat3333 days ago
+1
Facebook is a cancerous mole on our society.
1
Hadleys1584 days ago
+3
A the minimum sue the shit out of them for a new door and anything else broken.
3
G-Wins4 days ago
+7
Vote politicians into office that will make it a priority to hold individuals to account for violating people’s civil rights.
7
ZachMN4 days ago
+14
Republicanism is fascism. Republicanism is terrorism.
14
Literally_Laura4 days ago
+4
GREAT. Now do EVERYONE else.
4
Julen_234 days ago
+2
FFS .... shameful ISH
2
Demonokuma4 days ago
+2
I know if this happened to me the earth would be scorched. I wish these people had those people in their life.
2
Secure-Reading72254 days ago
+2
This is a lot that their doing in Minnesota. I didn't even know Mexicans lived there at all ? Why Minnesota ? Is this what's gonna start happening in every city ? I hope the f*** not . Hopefully they'll be shutdown before than and laughed off in the end. I don't think so though. I think ICE will ne a thing to reduce Americans of there freedoms. How the f*** would a American Citizen get kicked out of the country. It's happening in a city near you.
2
Conscious-Salt-15233 days ago
+1
I get the feeling Trump has no control.over his ppl....Just like Biden, their people are doing criminal stuff using their names.....Biden was simply incapable mentally at the end... Trump is either too stupid or too proud (or bith) to acknowledge that he has no control. Getting rid of Kristi Noem is too late...the inner group is controlling Trump, just like Israel is controlling Trump.
Same with the Dem on their socialist group. Previously they will just side step Bernie..now is not as easy to "manage". What we have is the Right Wing and Socialist influencing policies and decision..while the traditional Dems and GOP are all powerless.
1
Pour_Me_Another_1 day ago
+1
ICE was supposed to collect criminals, not realizing they were the criminals all along 🥲
157 Comments