We’re all trying to find the guys that put this new regime in power
752
StrengthToBreak1 day ago
+127
That's what's driving me nuts. It could be literally any one of us. OooOooOoo
127
OopsWeKilledGod1 day ago
+33
Am I the new Ayatollah?
*profuse sweating*
33
VagrantShadow1 day ago
+8
Are you the Ayatollah of Rock 'n' Rolla?
8
Djaii1 day ago
+4
Bust a deal, face the wheel.
4
OopsWeKilledGod17 hr ago
+2
Ayatollah Al di Meola
2
Potential-Field-61321 day ago
+34
Bare butt balls and back
34
GenericUsername20561 day ago
+13
Maybe you could do it, sir?
13
umpteenthrhyme1 day ago
+11
Well, somebody’s gonna have to do it.
11
Potential-Field-61321 day ago
+6
Nobody’s getting spanked
6
Potential-Field-61321 day ago
+7
Homegrown Simpsons stuff
7
GenericUsername20561 day ago
+1
I guess if nobody wants this southern part of Libanon, I'll take it.
1
umpteenthrhyme1 day ago
+1
“Random!” 😀
1
Megaphonestory1 day ago
+8
It all started 4,7.00 years ago.
8
Capital-Control3081 day ago
-4
😂😂😂 irony is a b****. Good one ☝️
-4
steve_ample1 day ago
+198
Did they also say that absolutely no one saw that coming?
198
min0nim1 day ago
+42
I know at least 2 people who obviously didn’t see this coming.
“I’m going to bomb the shit out of you, so be nice about it ok?”
42
Silent-Act1911 day ago
I'm pretty sure Israel wanted this to happen.
Peace in the region is a big obstacle to their expansionist policy.
0
Consistent-Song16431 day ago
+129
"Did I do that?"
-Donald "Urkel" Trump
129
Alternative_Town_1291 day ago
+20
Woah don’t insult urkel like that
20
pam_the_dude1 day ago
+3
He could shit his pants and find someone else to blame for it. There is zero chance he’s as self aware as Urkel.
3
MidLifeCrysis751 day ago
+268
So killing the new Ayatollah’s entire family didn’t calm him down? Weird. 🙄
268
Current-Function-7291 day ago
+49
Well, if he’s in fact in a coma he’s pretty calm.
49
5pin05auru51 day ago
+7
>~~Girlfriend~~ Ayatollah In A Coma.
7
IranianLawyer1 day ago
+24
He’s definitely calmed down. So calmed down that he’s either dead or in a coma. That’s why he hasn’t been seen or heard a single time since this war started.
24
Aggravating-Neat17681 day ago
+29
Or he was severely injured in a missile strike that killed most of his family, which probably takes a while to recover from?
Edit: [https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/irans-new-supreme-leader-has-severe-disfiguring-wounds-sources-say-2026-04-11/](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/irans-new-supreme-leader-has-severe-disfiguring-wounds-sources-say-2026-04-11/)
29
qTp_Meteor1 day ago
+14
So... he very well can be in a coma? If he was just disabled we could've seen him, he may be more than just disabled right now
14
Aggravating-Neat17681 day ago
+11
Well, it's true that we COULD have seen him, but being "just disabled" doesn't necessarily mean we WILL see him. It's possible he's in a recovery facility (or wherever he is) still not in a coma and they don't want to show the leader of the Shiite sect of Islam in a hospital gown. I mean it's also possible he is genuinely in a coma or dead and they're lying, but I'm just pointing out that the dude took a ballistic missile to the face, I don't think that's something most people eat and then emerge from in the light of the cameras a month later.
11
Bowl20071 day ago
+29
Hey guys, the new regime is even more hardline AND we maimed the new leader and killed his Dad and other members of his direct family.
29
Ecstatic_Bee60671 day ago
+104
Are you telling me that people are radicalized by bombing them?
104
Icy-Bodybuilder-3501 day ago
+28
Those people we've been bombing -- VERY UNFRIENDLY BUNCH!!
28
VanillaSkyDreamer1 day ago
+59
If my 8 year old daughter was bombed while in her school I would be a fanatic, even as an atheist.
59
Wonderful-Pause10481 day ago
+16
I can totally understand that. Probably everyone with a warm heart full of love.
16
New_Stats1 day ago
+3
No.
These people were already radicalized. It was well reported for YEARS that the leader of Iran was a moderate when compared to everyone else waiting in the wings. It was very very well known by every single intelligence agency on earth that killing that one guy would result in an way worse and more extreme Iranian regime
I'd b**** about having to play baby's first time paying attention to Iran on social media but the leaders of the US and Israel are playing a way worse game - pretending that this is a shock and not completely predictable, while having literally no plan on how to make the situation better
3
TheVeryVerity1 day ago
+13
I just don’t understand what their goal even was here
13
New_Stats1 day ago
+4
I legit think they wanted to bring on the apocalypse. Well the people surrounding Trump did. Israel is less clear, although they're clearly trying to grab land from Lebanon
Netanyahu has been trying to get the US to fight a war with Iran for decades, what his actual goal was is beyond me. I read that Israeli intelligence (or maybe just the idiots in power) thought that the Iranian people would rise up. But that didn't happen.
It's an absolute disgusting cluster f***. We have the largest, most capable military in the entire world and our leaders are making them look like incompetent assholes. It's just shameful.
4
Tuesday_6PM1 day ago
+9
Currently, Netanyahu needs a forever war to try to stave off his corruption trials. Though as you say, he’s been advocating for the US to attack Iran for decades, so clearly he has reasons beyond that. But hard to look at the current situation and think that this is working to Israel’s benefit
9
Viscerid1 day ago
+1
They and their proxies launched over 10 000 missiles and suicide drones at israel over the past 3 years, so...
1
comeonbjxgo1 day ago
-1
The masses aren’t radicalized. It is the hardliners that put gays in prison and murdered women for wanting to show their hair.
-1
OrangeJr361 day ago
+69
When extremists fail or are stopped their supporters don't just go away, they become even more extreme. They just become convinced that the reason why the old leadership failed was that they didn't go far enough.
69
The_mingthing1 day ago
+41
Sounds like the Republican party after Bush.
41
KtaadnRota1 day ago
+27
I think it's more that pragmatists, rather than extremists, tend to rise to positions of power in times of peace. I would categorize Ali Khamenei as a pragmatist, who knew how to *use* extremists, rather than an extremist himself.
Extremists, on the other hand, especially if they are already *near* the center of power (because pragmatic leaders are using them), tend to be ready to jump into sudden power vacuums in times of chaos and crisis.
I'm reminded of the 2 Chechen wars in the 90s. In the first one, a fairly reasonable secular Chechen government tried to declare independence from Russia. Then the Russians killed them all, and patted themselves on the back for a job well done. But once the reasonable leaders of the independence movement were dead, the only ones left were Islamist extremists. So Russia had to fight a whole second war, against *much* crazier enemies.
27
isaacfisher1 day ago
-9
Those “”pragmatists”” sponsored proxies that destabilized the region and brought so much violence behind the scenes, I’m not sure having a visible extremist is worse
-9
IranianLawyer1 day ago
-10
So what do you recommend? We should just accept extremism and get used to it?
-10
lindendweller1 day ago
+10
Far right extremists need an enemy to rally against. If you refuse to escalate, you undermine their narrative.
So no, you don't get used to it, you behave as much as possible like a partner, and it has a number of benefits among which :
It makes the extremists who call you evil into obvious liars
It makes sure the extremists are their citizen's worst enemy
You get more opportunities to provide direct help to the population.
Of course, the reverse is true if you decide to be an unreliable negotiator and you start to bomb them.
10
musci122341 day ago
Also people should see the number of rocket launches by hamas and see the time period that lines up with US Iran nuclear deal. One cannot look at that and not go "we were so close to peace".
0
ryo30001 day ago
+14
Maybe not starting wars would be a first good step?
Idk, just a suggestion
14
frddtwabrm041 day ago
-3
If you have to ask you already know the answer.
There is a reason why leaders like gadaffi, sadaam, Putin , Kim etcetc were/are let be...
As the Donald loved saying .. the cure is worse than the disease or some shit like that.
-3
rockerscott1 day ago
+6
If only there was some kind of historical record of the West overthrowing a regime simply for it to be replaced by even more extreme one.
Cue Family Guy scrolling list:
Iran
Guatemala
Cuba
Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo)
Dominican Republic
Vietnam
Chile
Laos
Cambodia
Grenada
Panama
Iraq
Afghanistan
Haiti
Honduras
Libya
Syria
Nicaragua
El Salvador
Bolivia
6
DanzakFromEurope1 day ago
+9
Because it's not a freaking new regime.
9
meerkat20181 day ago
+3
It *is* a new regime. There is no Ayatollah regime anymore.
The previous regime was built around the Ayatollah's theocratic governance. Now it seems the Ayatollahs have lost their power, and we are now probably looking at the IRGC-based military dictatorship.
3
0x476c6f7769651 day ago
+3
That’s not how the Shia sect works, Shias have to pledge their allegiance to the Mahdi’s deputy aka the Ayatollah. It’s like catholics and the pope.
3
meerkat20181 day ago
+3
That is, if you are an Ayatollah-based theocracy, not a military dictatorship or a monarchy. Iran was Shia during the Shah era too, and yet the Ayatollahs weren’t ruling anything.
If anything, the clergy has no power anymore because Khamenei was the key figure and his power was based on people personally loyal to him and all of them are now gone. There is no way IRGC generals are giving up power any time soon, and any hypothetical “allegiance” is now mere formality.
However, as counterintuitive it might be, at the moment we can’t predict if it is a good or bad thing for Iran in the long term.
3
AZBaldy1 day ago
+15
When you 6d chess so hard, you give your opponent rights over the Strait of Hormuz and usher in a more extreme government...
15
wwarnout1 day ago
+47
Hey, America, well played. You got rid of a bad guy, to be replaced with a worse guy.
You must be so tired of winning by now...
47
TROUT19861 day ago
+34
They also killed the worse guys father wife and son so I’m sure he’s gonna be chill
34
IranianLawyer1 day ago
-27
Don’t forget his w**** mom.
-27
yethos1 day ago
+16
his mom's not dead and also could u tell us how she's a w****
16
Zemouchi1 day ago
+10
I guess he confused her with his own mom
10
Hot_Gap9311 day ago
+9
Lmao bruh I think you're projecting your opinion of your own mother 😭😭
9
IranianLawyer1 day ago
-2
Nice of you to defend the honor of Mrs. Khamenei.
-2
IranianLawyer1 day ago
+6
Realistically, the “worse guy” is also dead or incapacitated. He hasn’t been seen or heard a single time since the strike that blew him and his family up, but we’re all just pretending he’s alive because the Islamic Republic hasn’t admitted he’s dead.
6
min0nim1 day ago
+11
So even if he’s having a weekend at Burnie’s, I’m sure the new government will all be as chill as f***, right?
An Iranian ‘Spring’ is never going to happen now.
11
[deleted]1 day ago
-11
[deleted]
-11
henryptung1 day ago
+6
Massacring 30,000 protesters is incompetent evil. A competent (and worse) regime would have enough grip and precision to avoid such a public display of weakness.
6
justinballsonya1 day ago
-4
I should have said more incompetent. If they had manged the country properly it would be the wealthiest by far in the middle east, but exchanging hardline religious fundamentalists for hardline religious fundamentalists can only be worse in their brutality, which was already near the extreme.
-4
froz3nt1 day ago
+3
I wonder who helped remove their democratically elected leadership some 70 odd years ago because of oil and installed their leadership.
3
justinballsonya1 day ago
-2
You can think you're making a good point, but as a Persian, the Shah was at least competent and significantly less authoritarian. I don't necessarily agree with reinstating his son, but it's much better to have a friend in America than to have a friend in Russia. At least, the economy wouldn't have collapsed.
-2
froz3nt1 day ago
+3
Im talking about the year 1953.
3
justinballsonya1 day ago
+3
Has no modern relevancy. I hope for a return to democracy, but I would take a non-religious dictatorship that doesn’t kill teenage girls for not wearing the covering perfectly.
3
froz3nt1 day ago
That event lead to consequences that are why iran has the rule it has.
0
Knees0ck1 day ago
+12
Gaza's death toll is approximately 75,000.
Approximately 175,000 injured.
Calculated evil.
12
7287661 day ago
+11
While we’re bringing up things completely unrelated to the Iranian regime killing protesters, Sudan‘s death toll is 150,000, with 12 million people displaced.
11
Suitable-Annual-87161 day ago
+7
Wow I can say without hesitation the people responsible for those 30,000 deaths, 75,000 deaths and 150,000 deaths respectively are all evil and make the world a worse place. I’m sure you agree?
7
froz3nt1 day ago
+6
Why isnt USA bombing em?
6
Ecstatic_Bee60671 day ago
+2
No oil
2
justinballsonya1 day ago
-4
Lmao usually this wouldn't be true, but bringing that up randomly in this context seems a bit antisemitic.
-4
jez1241 day ago
+18
Imbeciles.
18
Nemodin1 day ago
+22
Israel is lying.
The US is obviously lying.
And Iran in lying.
Chose your PoS player.
22
ranaadnanm1 day ago
+20
One is a totalitarian regime that doesn't pretend otherwise. The other two consider themselves democracies, and one even goes as far as to consider itself the "moral leader of the world".
20
[deleted]1 day ago
-8
[removed]
-8
maxofJupiter11 day ago
+2
What are you talking about?
2
ftrowl1 day ago
+11
Thats usually what happens when you kill the new leaders wife and father or bomb a school full of children in the first day to libarete the country
11
Several_Cold_71601 day ago
+3
I mean what did they suspect when youve blown there leadership to bits and also other family members as collateral that they would get on there knees and suck you off lol?
3
Future_Mousse_3551 day ago
+7
That was the plan.
7
Capital-Control3081 day ago
+5
We killed the new leaders Dad , wife, kid and relatives and for some strange reason he hates us more than the last guy
5
MindOk86181 day ago
+6
US never stops proving they have the dumbest admin in power now.
6
Khaganate231 day ago
+7
All these comments talking about the average citizen being radicalized must be braindead or a bot.
There are literally groups of Iranians getting revenge on the IRGC, not the jews or Americans, for a reason right now.
7
patrickgg1 day ago
+4
Krasnov’s doing really well
4
AccomplishedSoft13501 day ago
+4
Who could have seen that coming
4
ChaLenCe1 day ago
+5
Israel doesn't want the conflict to end it appears.
5
TheVeryVerity1 day ago
+3
They had to have known killing the previous ayatollah would result in this so I can only assume so
3
Yrths1 day ago
+4
Distinguishing between phases of the conflict for the 45+ years that Iran has been trying to destroy two countries is a tribulation. The conflict ends when Iran gives up that mission, which likely requires deposing the RG, not one person.
4
Lorward1851 day ago
+4
IDF also said Iran was 2 weeks away from building Nukes. This just in... IDF full of shit yet again.
4
shayKyarbouti1 day ago
+3
Well that sounds like somebody made a mistake in pushing this new regime into power and now crying about it
3
Pryoticus1 day ago
+4
Bombing the hell out of a country and killing its civilians and children tends to have that effect.
4
Apprehensive-Art10921 day ago
+6
Warning - now only ONE week from nukes! 😱
6
FirefighterLeft54251 day ago
+16
JD Vance looked like a f****** clown on his way to Disney World. We are so fucked.
16
Jeanclaudegahdam1 day ago
+5
The IDF is only good at bombing women and children
5
No_Indication96301 day ago
+4
Did bombing them for a month have anything to do with it? Killing 170 school girls in their school? Surely they won't want revenge for any of that?
4
IranianLawyer1 day ago
This regime murdered tens of thousands of innocent civilians in 2 days, but you’re still pretending they give a shit about 170. Why?
0
No_Indication96301 day ago
+2
Yeah they murdered tens of thousands of protesters. They'll still use it as an excuse for revenge. Why are you pretending there'll be no repercussions? You still think the US had done nothing to trigger 9/11? Or separately you think McVeigh just got up one morning and decided to do what he did with no outside influence?
2
FantasticFungiiii1 day ago
-1
Because they’re either ignorant or choose to remain ignorant.
-1
intricate_strands1 day ago
+3
It turns out, when you spend decades committing war crimes and doing all kinds of illegal and shady shit, and then actually get a nation's leaders murdered by your big bully friend, you don't accomplish f****** anything except make those people **more** extreme.
**Lots** of people knew that and have for a long time.
3
AllLiquid41 day ago
+2
I have a plan! We are going to unf##k this thing by f##king even harder!
2
UpTheRiffMate1 day ago
+1
Wasted all their party tricks on Hezbollah and Hamas, and then the best they could do for Iran was staged protests in-country lmao. Absolute joke.
1
DealerHumble11031 day ago
+1
Israeli strategy of "cutting the grass" doesn't seem well thought out
1
Sad_Explanation_64191 day ago
+1
Knesset votes to mobilise Iowa National Guard
1
ezagreb1 day ago
+1
Excuse for more/longer war
1
spacecadet841 day ago
+1
It's really starting to seem like that's the whole point. Target the doves and moderates among your opponents so that only the most hardline are left.
Then say "See? Look how radical they are! We can't make a deal with them, we just have to keep fighting!"
1
Realistic_Low83241 day ago
I can’t imagine why, it’s like someone dropped bombs on his family while under the guise of peace talks.
0
GoodOlSkipper1 day ago
+1
That’s what happens when you start assassinating heads of state…. Dumb asses
1
Olivedoggy1 day ago
+1
This is a problem that can be solved with another bomb.
1
No_Conversation_93251 day ago
+1
Wasn't that the plan in first place? Old Ayatollah was holding back regime's ambitions, which was unfortunate for Russia, despite all the help from Iran. Putin's vassals doing his bidding - nothing new, move on.
1
ux3l1 day ago
+1
Yeah, the assassination of their leader and innumerable bombings can make a regime more extreme.
1
Danzarr1 day ago
-1
well, whose responsible for that?
-1
Dairinn1 day ago
+3
The shitty IRGC that has been brutally murdering its own people for half a century and turned the Dec-January protests into a bloodbath. That's who.
3
Danzarr1 day ago
+3
Yeah, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is brutal and the state has repressed its population for decades—no argument there. The problem is that external attacks rarely weaken authoritarian systems; they usually strengthen them by rallying people around the state and sidelining opposition.
So you end up empowering the same group that’s cracking down internally. That’s the trap. Actions by Netanyahu risk consolidating hardliners in Iran, not weakening them. And the Strait of Hormuz isn’t some economic win—it’s leverage through disruption, which just raises tensions and makes the future more unstable, not better.
3
Dairinn1 day ago
+4
I never said the war was thought-out or any of the past weeks have made sense.
But saying that the increased shittiness of the IRGC is the US/Israel's fault isn't productive, either. The IRGC is just showing its colours and playing victim. They're the absolute worst already.
4
Danzarr1 day ago
+1
they are terrible, but we gave them leverage, thats something israel and US leadership needs to be held account to. We dont have power over the IRCG, but we do have power to blame trump and netanyahu for their parts, and call atto defund israel's land grab and accountability against trump/hesgeth.
1
Specialist-Garbage941 day ago
+2
The IRGC didn’t kill the previous ayatollah.
2
Dairinn1 day ago
+4
As if the ayatollah was hosting a bookclub and *now* they got angry, poor souls.
The IRGC is a bunch of murderous perverted pedophiles who thrive on opression and terror. This is who they've always been, it's just that it wasn't so prominently in the news and it didn't affect the rest of us so directly.
They've been marrying off 9 yo girls, executing women for being raped, raping and beating women to death for wearing the hijab the wrong way, hanging men for being gay, arming terrorists around the world, infiltrating universities and think tanks and generally killing anyone who stood in their way for decades.
4
JCeee6661 day ago
+1
The IRGC are the murderous perverted pedophiles? Bro…you’re saying this unironically?
1
TheVeryVerity1 day ago
Yes. But according to the Israelis now they are even worse. So…
0
NemisisCW1 day ago
Damn bombing the shit out of them didnt mellow them out? Not even the school?
0
King_Fisher991 day ago
-1
The only extreme fascist regime that exists is in the country that starts with I and end with L.
-1
KanyeWestsPoo1 day ago
The IDF would know a thing or two about extremism
0
Capital-Control3081 day ago
If they did anything they guaranteed Iran will get nuclear weapons
0
TheVeryVerity1 day ago
Agreed. At this point getting nukes seems like the only way to be safe as a country not in league with trump
0
IntelArtiGen1 day ago
Looks like Trump was right when he said there was a regime change.
0
ash_ninetyone1 day ago
Everyone saw how unwise this was the minute they intervened.
Bunch of clowns
0
Silver_Middle_72401 day ago
-4
Hit him again. I worked on Japan.
-4
Majestic-Two34741 day ago
Imagine that
0
_x_oOo_x_1 day ago
Wasn't the plan a "continuous regime change", until there's someone less extreme?
0
luv2ctheworld1 day ago
-3
Oh, you mean bombing and killing their people didn't make them less mad?
-3
Life-is-beautiful-1 day ago
-1
Wars only create generational hatred. What is so tough to understand?
136 Comments