Everytime a new show or movie comes out people are always complaining about it being too dark, desaturated, washed out, low contrast, bad lighting, etc. So why dont they ever listen? Its a constant complaint i hear and i agree with it. I just dont understand why they continue doing it? It makes everything look c**** and lifeless.
industry standards got locked in during the early 2000s digital transition and now everyone just follows the same color grading playbook. plus most of these decisions get made by people watching on $50k reference monitors in controlled lighting while we're all squinting at our tvs with the lamp on
264
Im-A-Tomato-1744Mar 28, 2026
+165
>these decisions get made by people watching on $50k reference monitors in controlled lighting
Exactly. Just like there are so many complains about sound mixing and not being able to hear dialogue, but sound editors talk about how the decisions are made listening on the perfect set up and they won't listen to the engineers saying it'll sound bad to regular viewers... they just don't care because they don't want to "compromise on quality"
165
devospiceMar 28, 2026
+57
I don't understand this mindset. When I'm working on a song I work on the mix in my studio and then when I'm happy with it the first thing I do is listen to it in my car while I'm driving. I want to hear it in the environment where people are most likely to listen so I can ensure it sounds good there. Then I tweak it until it sounds good in my car. It's usually little things, and it never ruins the sound in the studio, but it makes a huge difference when listening with road noise.
57
TechieADMar 28, 2026
+16
Yeah car test is super common and I know people who own a pair of goodwill headphones just for referencing. Hell I listen to my own shit on my phone speakers occasionally to test it
16
makingkevinbaconMar 29, 2026
+1
Solid point and to add why I also don't understand that mindset...if people generally aren't happy with it, even if it's perfect technically, is it still quality?
1
MultipleHipFlasksMar 28, 2026
+83
Memories of Tenet having a lot of people say it sounded mumbley, but Nolan said it was great on his really specific home theatre.
83
KuraeshinMar 28, 2026
+74
Nolan can be such a t***, because he makes his movies for theaters with the best ultra-high quality sound system, while most theaters (at least in my area) are mid-tier.
74
MultipleHipFlasksMar 28, 2026
+28
Also he has experts come to maintain his, average theatre just has a normal person turn some dials and hope for the best.
28
alter_ego19456Mar 28, 2026
+2
Yeah, I’ve seen a lot of complaints on Listnook from people reporting Project Hail Mary was blurry on IMAX screens.
2
KidGorgeous19Mar 28, 2026
+4
Yup - went to see project Hail Mary last weekend and one of the main speakers was blown so gave static every time the volume went above a certain level. Which was quite often.
4
Link_GRMar 28, 2026
+14
I remember a letter a fan sent to the Weekly Planet that said they were visiting Nolan's estate to see a trailer or something and were ushered into a full on movie theater that could sit like 20 people. This person asked the attendant (Nolan wasn't there) if Nolan watches his movies there. The attendant chuckled and said "oh, this is for guests".
Dude is way out of touch and has been for a loooong time.
14
iBoMbYMar 28, 2026
+4
The Tenet sound mix is dog shit. I stopped watching it after a few minutes, because it was unbearable.
4
byneothernameMar 28, 2026
+8
I used captions but it turns out it’s not a good movie even when you know exactly what’s being said.
8
ParkerPoseyGuffmanMar 28, 2026
+1
I saw it in Dolby Atmos and still found it to be ass and I love his movies sans 2
1
Universe_NutMar 28, 2026
+18
Those people have clearly never heard of the trunk bump test hip hop producers utilize to make sure their music sounds good on any platform, any speaker.
18
AcreaRising4Mar 28, 2026
+3
It’s not this at all.
I’m a professional colorist and I work with color scientists often. We grade on our calibrated setups because literally every monitor is different.
If we graded on a random tv monitor, guess what? Your phone would look like shit. And vice versa
3
Im-A-Tomato-1744Mar 28, 2026
+13
Can I ask is there a reason some scenes need to be *so* dark though? I get all the rest, but my issue is with scenes that are so dark it can be tough to see any details... to the point than on some screens they can look almost totally black.
Were not talking about making them overly lit, but if a scene is *that* dark, surely it can be made a touch brighter without affecting the overall quality so at least it can be seen on those screens?
13
AcreaRising4Mar 28, 2026
+2
Chances are they aren’t that dark when we’re grading. Not the best example, but I graded a movie a few years back that had a ton of night shots. When I watched it in theaters it looked great, but I recently watched it on YouTube on my tv and it looked terrible. Super lifted and bright. Had to adjust a lot of settings before it looked okay.
My point is they’re not always that dark. I’m sure in the DI, it looks better. It’s a streaming/tv problem imo
2
BalthanonMar 29, 2026
+3
Honestly, we're at the point where you would think if it is possible to change settings to make it look better smart TVs would be able to calibrate for individual movies. Like you basically provide a set of specs in the file of the movie for where it should be at and they just adjust on the fly to match that.
I suppose that falls into the standards area though. Maybe the integrated AIs they're no doubt building into TVs now will be able to handle it eventually
3
rocketmonkeeMar 29, 2026
+5
You'd still get mixed results. Not all TVs have identical settings (which you alluded to when you mentioned standards). Also, if a digital file included the necessary settings to look good, and the TV adjusted itself accordingly, it still might look off because the surrounding environment can change the appearance of the image. The bandwidth of the stream, the underlying hardware of the TV, the ambient lighting in the room, the color of the paint behind the TV, and other factors all weigh in.
5
Im-A-Tomato-1744Mar 28, 2026
+1
Ok, fair enough. Thanks for the info!
1
zaminDDHMar 29, 2026
+1
Yup, a big problem is that most people watch stuff on streaming. Streaming can't (won't) support the bitrate required to display most dark scenes correctly.
Throw that same movie on on a 4k UHD disc on even the most basic TVs from the last 5 or so years, and it'll look 10x better.
1
JidariousMar 28, 2026
+14
Like we've heard this before, but you're wrong and the proof is this f****** thread. It's nearly universal agreement that it's too dark if the person watching it isn't in the industry, and you people in the industry need to get your heads out of your asses and figure out why and fix it.
14
AcreaRising4Mar 28, 2026
-2
No, this thread is wrong and none of you know what you’re talking about. Just because a lot of people say something doesn’t mean it’s right.
And for what it’s worth, there is a simple fix for it. We know what the issue is. To fix this problem every display manufacturer needs to have consistent designs/standards/color management. But that’s not possible because half of them won’t work or release any information about their displays. If we grade something on a consumer monitor, it will look horrible on any other monitor that isn’t that specific monitor. That is the objective truth.
There is literally no workaround for this. That is why we use a calibrated monitor. it’s not for our f****** health i can tell you that, they’re insanely expensive. There is literally no other way to get a consistent output. So go b**** to people that make the TVs instead of complaining about overworked and underpaid colorists.
-2
BeneCowMar 28, 2026
+14
Ok, so explain this. Last weekend I watched all the Avengers movies up until Endgame. On a 10 year old iPad, sitting outside in the sun with a pretty big breeze. Avengers 1 looked fine and I could hear everything, Endgame I had to keep f****** with the volume to hear the dialogue because the music was about twice as loud. How does the same franchise that had the balancing right a decade ago suffer from the problems they didn’t then? How does movies from the 90s still seem fine but the current stuff is all too dark and the sound is mixed so shit?
14
f0gaxMar 28, 2026
+19
The solution to too many displays is to make it perfect on one type of display. A display that consumers don’t have. And the results are that consumers have a bad experience.
If Ford made it so their cars ran great on some perfect road they had. But the cars ran like shit everywhere else, because there are too many different road types, they’d get rightfully roasted.
19
AcreaRising4Mar 28, 2026
+3
that’s not what I said nor is it what we’re doing at all. We’re not grading on one random display and calling it a day. We grade on high end monitors that are specifically calibrated via a colorimeter and spectroradiometer so that we can provide the most consistent end-to-end grade possible. We utilize broadcast color spaces that are used across displays to achieve as much consistency as we can, but that’s kinda impossible.
We start in the best place knowing that once it leaves the suite it’s going to degrade. There’s no real alternative. I do appreciate people on the internet discovering things that color scientists/colorists/DPs have been talking about for decades, it’s kinda fun in a sense.
3
abracadabra12983Mar 28, 2026
+5
So it's not you who's drunk, it's the entire world except you and your colleagues eh? Bruh
5
SituationSoapMar 28, 2026
+3
If the premise of your argument is that a bunch of people on the Internet can't be stupid and wrong about something all at the same time, I have terrible news about the state of the world.
3
abracadabra12983Mar 29, 2026
+1
If your argument that people cannot be bothered by something bad that someone makes, I also have some terrible news for you.
There's a reason why enshittification has appeared in our vocabulary.
1
SituationSoapMar 29, 2026
+1
Considering you don't know what enshittification means, I'm not sure you're in a great place to try to make this argument.
1
AcreaRising4Mar 28, 2026
+2
I like how you ignore the entire explanation I gave and just laser focused on one thing. Very cool
2
keving87Mar 29, 2026
+1
I definitely totally absolutely don't need to hear what the movie is actually about, no way, but F****** DEAFEN ME WITH A RANDOM CAR ENGINE OFF TO THE SIDE OUT OF FRAME.
1
qtxMar 28, 2026
+4
Less colors also means less data needed for streaming. For me that seems to be the biggest reason.
Less bandwidth needed to deliver good passable streams means less money the streaming services need to pay for that bandwidth.
4
AcreaRising4Mar 28, 2026
+15
That is fully incorrect and is not how deliverables work. All of these movies and shows are shot and graded in 12 or 16 bit for VFX. That is basically the most amount of data that you can acquire.
Netflix films are delivered in a 10 or 12 bit DPX. That is, again, a ton of color information. Lower contrast grades are not gonna change your data output. That’s not how that works at all. It’s all there as is.
15
SeerPumpkinMar 28, 2026
+2
That's not how it works
2
OtherwiseJello2055Mar 28, 2026
+2
Funny you say that. They use to specifically make different cuts for theaters and home theaters because of this in the late 70s until digital became standard. That why they would sell " wide screen" or " letterbox" cuts too.
2
_trouble_every_day_Mar 29, 2026
+3
Aspect ratio has nothing to do with anything you mentioned. They did that that becomes old TVs had square monitors, now they’re all the same ratio as movie screens
3
OtherwiseJello2055Mar 29, 2026
+1
Oh.
1
justeandjMar 28, 2026
+28
This is the answer. Also of note: has OP ever met a colorist? They're divas.
28
LeCafeClopeCacaMar 28, 2026
+56
A field hyper-specialist being somewhat picky ? Color me shocked ( #E0A2AD )
56
Deadlocked02Mar 28, 2026
+24
Creatives show their true colors when you criticize their work.
24
sufficientgatsbyMar 28, 2026
+4
They teach you how to take critique in most art schools. In my experience, students weren't even allowed to respond to crit from classmates unless directly asked a question.
Creative expression is inherently vulnerable, so most people really do need some training on how to not take anything personally- otherwise you start hating all your clients and feeling constantly attacked.
4
AcreaRising4Mar 28, 2026
+12
Maybe it’s because a bunch of people that don’t know what they’re talking about are constantly criticizing.
I wouldn’t come to your job and tell you that I know better
12
RustashMar 28, 2026
+14
But if a bunch of people are saying “hey this doesn’t look/sound good” maybe it’s worth taking another look at your work instead of writing them off?
14
AcreaRising4Mar 28, 2026
+3
I’m not writing them off but there’s a clear lack of understanding as to why we’re making these choices. People are saying things as if colorists are 100% responsible for the look of this when we’re doing the best we can with an imperfect system.
3
omnisephirothMar 29, 2026
+1
In fairness, people are saying they’re confused. Like, obviously, some people suck and get personal, but even this post was, “People complain and nothing changes and I don’t understand why.”
I, for one, am genuinely interested in why this is happening, so if you’re willing to tell me, I’m happy to learn. The last thing I heard was it had something to do with how HD cameras work, but it’s been a while since I’ve looked into this, and I’d be willing to believe I’m misremembering or outdated on my information.
So, please, tell me more.
1
DjSpelkMar 28, 2026
+12
I'm sorry but this is a regularly repeated silly argument.
I won't necessarily know how to do someone's job better, but can tell if they've done a shit job as a consumer/customer.
You can't tell me you've never complained about a service/product you've received.
12
SumeriandawnMar 28, 2026
+1
" Why don't NFL quarterbacks attempt 20+ yards passing every time? Why waste time with with short pass attempts? "
" In basketball, 3pt shots are worth more than 2pt shots. Why are players shooting 2pt shots? So wasteful. Doesn't the coach realize that?"
"These baseball players are so dumb. Why not attempt to hit a home run on every swing? Homeruns are worth more than singles. If I was a manager, I would instruct the players to swing for the fences everytime"
😂
1
DjSpelkMar 29, 2026
+2
Hey, the basketball player fumbled all his passes, gave the ball away 12 times and missed every shot but thats okay, you can't criticise or complain unless you're a coach or pro athlete.
Got an electrician to put in an extra socket, ended up with an electrical fire and the house burned down.
Can't complain though, not an electrician.
2
AcreaRising4Mar 28, 2026
Literally 90% of people don’t even know color grading exists and most have no clue how the process works. So yes, spreading misinformation about why a colorist does what they do is stupid.
My proof of that is this entire thread where literally every conclusion about why we grade like this is wrong.
0
DjSpelkMar 29, 2026
+4
Those are good and valid points. Those you should make. Point out at every opportunity you get. Correct people and especially call out misinformation.
But don't say you can't criticise any output if you don't work in that field, that's nonsensical.
4
Demetri124Mar 28, 2026
+9
So if you’re not a chef you’re never allowed to say any food is bad?
9
AcreaRising4Mar 28, 2026
-2
The average person doesn’t even know that color grading is a thing. Not really a fair comparison when most people know something about cooking/eating. Again, you can just look at this thread and the incredible amounts of misinformation.
-2
Demetri124Mar 28, 2026
+7
The average person knows as much about looking at colors as they do eating. If someone’s who’s never made a steak in their life can go to a restaurant and form an opinion it, then people can have thoughts on coloring in the things they watch. You can’t have one without the other
This logic that coloring is a complex job and therefor only colorists are allowed to have opinions on it is very bizarre. Who are they color grading films for then? Other colorists who happen to be watching? Is the film industry paying billions of dollars of production money just so colorists can perform vanity work that is apparently just imperceptible and inconceivable to 99% of the audience?
There's one here in the comments saying everyone is wrong 😀😂
3
tbo1992Mar 29, 2026
+1
What is the incentive to do it in the first place? It’s not the default, it’s a recent change.
1
songsforthedeaf07Mar 28, 2026
+44
Watch Plurbuis. It’s the total opposite. All bright colours
44
Agitated_Position392Mar 29, 2026
+9
It takes place in Albuquerque bro. If you're not wearing sunglasses, the world looks over-exposed.
9
whitniverseMar 28, 2026
+157
Because people will still watch it in the millions. Their “complaining” means nothing.
157
OnesharpmanMar 28, 2026
+53
But a couple hundred people on Listnook say they hate it!!
53
F4DedProphet42Mar 28, 2026
+16
Slow down there. Only 25 upvotes so far.
16
dylank22Mar 28, 2026
+3
yeah they are vastly overestimating how many people "hate it" or even really care. such a listnook take, also doesn't even seem to have a specific complaint and just lists every reason anything can look bad lol
3
cippopotomasMar 28, 2026
"such a listnook take" is the epitome of listnook takes.
0
dylank22Mar 29, 2026
As is this comment which adds nothing to the conversation
0
33ff00Mar 28, 2026
+2
Rob schneeidder isha ..f*** you you’ll watch it
2
tfhermobwoaywayMar 29, 2026
+1
People don’t understand that TV is the greatest artform mankind has ever invented. Everyone will always turn out to watch it.
1
booksfoodfunMar 28, 2026
+79
Because people still watch it.
79
tvtomsMar 28, 2026
+16
However, if the same episode were offered with good lighting in the same time s*** you could select with your remote.. would they still be watching the dark one? Now that it's not the only option? not likely.
16
JamesMagnusMar 28, 2026
+18
If you’re not losing money and the complaints mostly seem to come from a vocal online group then you’d be hard pressed to find a company that’s willing to spend extra to change anything.
18
BoxOfNothingMar 28, 2026
+3
A group consisting largely of people who'd complain about something no matter what you made. There are a worrying amount of people out there who seem to watch movies and TV shows specifically looking for something to complain about. If they can be vague or point to something that's "in" to complain about, they'll go for it. Commonly lighting, sound, and some vague comment about "bad/lazy writing", which is one that they can almost never actually explain. They'll moan about how everything is too dark these days in one sentence, and then everything is too bright and saturated in the next.
I saw some people crying about how an episode of A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms was too dark like all other shows recently, when that was not even remotely true. I assume because they thought it'd be an easy dunk (not a pun).
3
SolomonBlackMar 29, 2026
+1
You forgot "CGI" which seems to have no substance beyond "I realized it was CGI" unless its a movie they like.
1
thecheesycheeseloverMar 28, 2026
+1
It’s something that’s so hard to quantify… I’m sure they do lose money - there are quite a few shows I’ve either not watched at all or stopped watching because of this, but I don’t post about it online, don’t write in to complain… with people like me (I have friends who’re the same and imagine there are plenty of us) they probably assume we’re not into the shows for other reasons.
1
ground__contro1Mar 28, 2026
+3
But there is no other option so that point is pretty moot
3
EnchelionMar 29, 2026
+1
Not watching that show/episode is always an option. But it turns out the color being a little less than perfect actually isn't a big deal for viewers.
1
Im-A-Tomato-1744Mar 28, 2026
+4
No, but it doesn't matter to the studio... people are watching it either way. So they'll do it their way. (ETA typo)
4
ItchyGoiterMar 28, 2026
+3
Most people would not notice or care. What is the incentive to broadcast multiple versions of the same episode? That's wasted money.
3
tvtomsMar 28, 2026
+5
Yeah I'm not suggesting they actually do that.
5
Agitated_Position392Mar 29, 2026
+1
This is exactly it. Most people are dumb, don't care about cinematography, or just straight up don't pay attention.
1
gagreelMar 28, 2026
+44
It's not as prevalent as you may think, most high level productions still look great (look at the best picture noms this year). The issue is when you get into streaming productions, and I think it's mostly because of vfx sets/backgrounds. It takes a lot of planning to match and composite real lighting with virtual lighting and you have to make decisions while shooting, which means less options to tweak the cgi background, so they keep it flat. As depth maps and relighting become more advanced this will usher in a new era of contrast
44
Crash324Mar 28, 2026
+2
I've never met a DP or gaffer who would ever in a million years let the VFX department tell them how to light their scene.
[How people who complain that shows are too darks' living rooms are lit](https://i.imgur.com/IoGyVhO.jpeg)
2
BorghalMar 28, 2026
+11
>[How people who complain that shows are too darks' living rooms are lit](https://i.imgur.com/IoGyVhO.jpeg)
I watched GoT episodes with lights off and blinds drawn, and it was still too dark to enjoy.
11
MrLlammaMar 29, 2026
+1
ITT: Hundreds of people speaking confidently about an industry they know nothing about
1
AcreaRising4Mar 28, 2026
Amen. You would be laughed out of the camera department..
0
El_humanMar 28, 2026
+24
One Piece has fun bright colors
24
PepeSylvia11Mar 28, 2026
+6
Voting with your wallet is the only way to enact actual change. This applies to everything, not just television.
6
LionTigerWingsMar 28, 2026
+15
Because most people don’t care and a lot of the times, it does actually look good on a high end tv.
15
EnchelionMar 29, 2026
+3
Even basic TVs really. A few outliers exist, like the infamous night battle of GoT, but the vast majority of shows these days look great on whatever c**** set you bought from Costco.
3
Awkward_Silence-Mar 29, 2026
+1
Even that infamous battle doesn't look bad on the Blu-ray with a properly set up 4K HDR TV.
Most of the complaints about that episode stemmed from people watching the heavily compressed MAX stream which compression artefacts butcher anything dark or fast moving. Or the live cable stream that isn't even real 1080p
1
dylank22Mar 28, 2026
+4
the simple truth that they can't face and accept the haters are the vocal minority
4
EnvironmentClear4511Mar 28, 2026
+23
Listnook complaining =/= "everyone hates".
Listnook is a very insular community and it's been proven time and time again that popular opinion on Listnook is often not aligned with general sentiment.
23
JamStan1978Mar 28, 2026
-2
Its not just listnook, its facebook, twitter, youtube, tiktok, and basically any other website that talks about tv shows and movies.
-2
1731799517Mar 28, 2026
+7
You might want to google "social media bubble". You are in one. Every service is just going to show you what they feel will make you have the most engagement.
7
Wrong-Vermicelli4723Mar 28, 2026
+7
Again that’s just how social media works, the complaints are the loudest. In reality Most people really don’t care lol.
Everyone and their mom was complaining and talking about boycotting Hogwarts legacy on Listnook, Facebook, twitter, YouTube , TikTok and basically any other website that talks about video games…. Guess what the game still sold 30 million copies. Saying you hate something and proceeding to still watch or play it isn’t going to change anything.
7
xxMyBoyFridayxxMar 28, 2026
+23
because it is cheaper on multiple levels
23
danielzur2Mar 28, 2026
+3
The comments you read online make up an insignificant fraction of the world and should never be used as scale for reference.
The internet is an echo chamber inside an echo chamber.
3
Demetri124Mar 28, 2026
+3
Because the average person will watch it anyway
3
HeartyBeastMar 28, 2026
+3
Because not everyone does. You are arguing from a false premise
3
grogloxMar 28, 2026
+5
It isn’t always shows, part of it is the devices and distribution methods. You are watching compressed content that gains additional losses in transmit based on network issues, device issues, etc. The way the content is mastered it looks and sounds fine, but since streaming it has become much MUCH harder to master a film for distribution. HDR also allows creators to film content that looks so much better, but when compressed back to SDR can crush huge portions of the image detail.
There isn’t an easy answer short of government standard regulations that will solve the issue in a way most folks would consider actually “fixed”. Everything else is a workaround to try to make it as good as possible.
5
TheEndingWasFineMar 28, 2026
+6
It’s not a constant complaint, you’re just in spaces that complain about it a lot.
6
RingosisMar 28, 2026
+5
I mean... I'm currently watching One Piece, Invincible, and Monarch. First two are very vibrant and bright, and Monarch despite its subject matter, uses colour and contrast well.
Can't really think of anything new I've watched recently that was dark and colourless. What's making you think they haven't listened?
5
Affectionate_Owl_619Mar 29, 2026
+3
Invincible is a cartoon. Not a fair comparison
3
thetatershaveeyesMar 28, 2026
+2
That Game of Thrones spinoff earlier this year was so grey and dingy I couldn't get through an episode. The new Harry Potter show is looking pretty grey. The Last of Us season 2 was visually uninteresting. Even if shows aren't completely colourless, they're way more muted than they would have been 25 years ago.
2
thefrogmanMar 29, 2026
+1
I can't imagine why shows filmed in the UK might look a bit gray.
1
thetatershaveeyesMar 29, 2026
+1
I guess you also think Mexico should look yellow in tv shows.
1
EnchelionMar 29, 2026
+1
Game of Thrones has always gone for an intentionally "gritty" pallette, well before the to-dark fight everyone harps on. I expect it's an intentional thematic choice.
1
koreanelvis420Mar 28, 2026
+10
Saving money, it always comes down to saving companies money.
10
Mndelta25Mar 28, 2026
+16
A lot of it is because the shows are filmed to look good on very high end televisions. On an 80 inch 4k TV, most of these shows look great. On the $300 black Friday special, they look like garbage.
Remember the notorious GoT episode that everybody complained about? We watched it in a friend's home theater and it looked amazing.
16
SaloncinxMar 28, 2026
+5
I have a large OLED 4k TV and some of those dark House of the Dragon episodes were still rough
5
syngatesthe2ndMar 28, 2026
+3
Unfortunately, everything is still being streamed at a fairly low bitrate, even on the premium 4K tiers of these streaming services.
3
SaloncinxMar 28, 2026
+3
Good point. All the more reason the folks editing and shooting these shows should be cognizant of the ultra dark scenes that they know will be compressed to hell on streaming.
3
rationalalienMar 28, 2026
+4
>people are always complaining
There you go.
People who complain are always the loudest but that doesn't make them the majority. I personally like this look.
4
DesertbroMar 28, 2026
+5
***it's NOT "everybody"***
it's only a tiny fraction of viewers on social media who gripe about these things nonstop
you're asking a business to change practices due to some YouTube influencers whose marketing gimmick is to insult everything as much as possible
5
arealhumannotabotMar 28, 2026
+5
One problem is the vast array of setups people have at home. A lot of you need to adjust your settings and find what works for you
I do agree some shows are too dark but a lot of you are also watching on settings that aren’t optimized
Don’t get started on volume. I never ride levels, I adjusted mine and it’s been fine for several years. But everyone’s convinced themselves that it’s the mixing that’s the problem but, I hate to sound arrogant, they don’t know how the mixing process even works
5
Raider_ScumMar 28, 2026
+2
This is so true.
Most TVs are shipped in "Eco mode" and im willing to bet 50% of people never change it.
2
AnusbagelsMar 28, 2026
+5
lol I’ve heard the opposite about high saturation etc. usually people complaining about this will say something along the lines of “every show and movie is like this” when in fact it’s not every show and movie. The same people that complain there’s nothing good or original but never branch out and give new things a try or even go back and watch things from the last 5 decades. It’s nonsense.
5
ZeeMcZedMar 28, 2026
+13
If everyone hates AI, why do companies keep shoving AI down our gullets?
13
nighthawk_mdMar 28, 2026
+12
To prop up the stock market and hold off the recession?
12
KaJaHaMar 28, 2026
+8
Because they've pumped billions into the bubble and can't afford to stop
8
phatmagic123Mar 28, 2026
+2
It’s not that the shows look bad, it’s that you have a budget tv. They’re calibrated for OLED and other high end panels. They look great on more expensive TVs.
2
Extension-Fail-1917Mar 28, 2026
+2
It’s crazy.
2
whitebanditMar 29, 2026
+2
i think a major issue is compression, streaming and shit has compressed Good audio/video into a mushy mess
2
whitnickMar 28, 2026
+2
The real answer isn't that it's cheaper or that people will watch it anyways. It's that everybody doesn't hate it. The vast majority of people aren't complaining and either don't care or think it looks good. There's always going to be people on both sides, thinking it looks good or looks bad. The showrunners are going to do whatever they think looks good.
2
ItsAComedyShowMar 28, 2026
+5
“Everytime?” Really? Every time?
5
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
+7
[deleted]
7
SovoyMar 28, 2026
+7
The people making the shows.
7
Deadlocked02Mar 28, 2026
+22
Why do people on this site love to feign ignorance, like a bunch of mean girls? Why not just ignore the question? OP could’ve worded his question better, yes, but it’s abundantly clear they are talking about networks and creatives.
This is much more annoying than poorly worded questions.
22
Do_itschMar 28, 2026
+3
Dark shots are more forgiving with CGI. Which saves them money.
I've never watched Game of Thrones but was reading that they did that huge battle at the end of the show in the dark because it obviously saves them money.
People where really pissed at the time, because they couldnt see jack shit.
3
ananbdMar 28, 2026
+23
CG professional, here.
That is 100% incorrect.
The real answer is much simpler: VFX are made for cinema display conditions. If your TV isn’t set up correctly and you’re not watching in a dark room, you won’t see detail in the blacks.
Why? Director’s choice. They work like they’re making a film, not a TV show.
So… I suppose you could think of it as an ego thing on the part of the director. But it certainly doesn’t save money or make things easier.
23
sexandliquorMar 28, 2026
+6
Yeah I feel like most people who have these complaints about tv shows looking too dark have never adjusted their tv settings whatsoever.
Just took that shit out of the box and started watching everything and they wonder why everything looks like shit.
I’m convinced this is why everyone complains about “bad CG” as well and then post their phone camera footage of their tv going “why does this look shit dawggg? It looks like a PS2 game”
And then you see they’re watching the shit with motion smoothing on
6
dylank22Mar 28, 2026
+4
but but but listnook said it was cheaper so that must be it
4
Constant-Piano-6123Mar 28, 2026
+4
“It looked perfect on the £10k broadcast monitor in the suite. It’s not my fault you have windows and a consumer tv”
4
ananbdMar 28, 2026
+1
Exactly.
Or, in my case, you’re a professional who spent a lot of time fiddling her TV before watching the last season of GoT.
If you set contrast (white point) as high as it goes, and bump up brightness (black point), you can see a decent amount of detail, even on a crappy TV. But yes, it looks much better on a high-end display.
1
KeenJellyMar 28, 2026
+1
Even of your TV is set up correctly and you are watching in a dark room you still won't see anything, because the 4Mbps stream on netflix will crush all those shades of black into a single blurry mess.
1
Im-A-Tomato-1744Mar 28, 2026
-3
>VFX are made for cinema display conditions. If your TV isn’t set up correctly and you’re not watching in a dark room, you won’t see detail in the blacks
How much of their audience do they think watches tv in cinema conditions??!
ETA Seeing "detail in the blacks" is a bit of a reach for anyone, even with the lights off and a decent tv that's set up correctly... that's basic physics. It's incredibly difficult to see things in dark shadow IRL, never mind LCD screens where the viewing angle matters.
ETA 2: Question - are people downvoting this for the idea that not everyone has cinema conditions, or stating that dark shadows, by their very nature, make it difficult to see what's going on? Because they're the 2 points made in this comment...
-3
BigL90Mar 28, 2026
+6
I dunno, but as someone who has a cinema-esque setup, I appreciate it.
So many of my friends and family watch TV and movies on terrible settings (brighter doesn't mean better folks), with stupid features turned on (I genuinely don't get how folks can watch with soap opera effect shit turned on), in brightly lit rooms. Honestly, most of that stuff is perfectly fine for watching most network TV stuff. But if you're watching prestige TV or movies, of course it's gonna look like c***.
And that doesn't even take into account how many younger folks watch on their phone/tablets/laptops, even when they have a perfectly accessible TV.
I'm glad movies and prestige TV don't cater to the lowest common denominator in terms of viewing conditions.
6
TheEndingWasFineMar 28, 2026
+6
You’re not going to be able to tell a professional “make your stuff look worse” and get away with it
6
Im-A-Tomato-1744Mar 28, 2026
+1
Everything is contextual. You're saying "make your stuff look worse" for a *minority* of your viewers... i.e. make it *better for more people* than you make it worse for. It's always a balancing act.
1
TheEndingWasFineMar 28, 2026
+5
Or they assume if they give the highest quality version to the distributor the distributor will figure out how to provide it in an optimal fashion. Plus once you’ve made it worse you can never make it right
5
ananbdMar 28, 2026
+1
Haha I don’t make the rules! I have no idea how the execs and directors came to this decision. Definitely leaves out some of the audience, that’s for sure.
I think people are downvoting your physics comment. Our eyes see much more detail in darks than brights. It’s an evolutionary trait — gotta be able to see things trying to eat you in the dark. When it’s bright out, the difference between light levels isn’t as important.
Also, you can set any TV to display the detail in the blacks. The issue is the contrast ratio. A bad TV can’t display lights and darks *at the same time*.
1
Im-A-Tomato-1744Mar 28, 2026
+1
>Our eyes see much more detail in darks than brights
That's only true if you're in a predominantly dark environment. If you're watching tv in a room with even very low lighting, as most people do, it's very difficult to see the contrast. And that's try in general, not just for TV. (ETA: I say all this as someone who works in website development so I'm somewhat familiar with colour theory, screen settings, contrast etc)
I simply don't understand why scenes have to be *so* dark that sitting in a very dark room is a requirement to watch certain shows.
1
ananbdMar 28, 2026
+1
The bit you quoted is a fact unrelated to TV. It’s a well-known emprical measurement. It’s the perceptual gradient of our eyes: we are more able to perceive differences in dim light levels than bright ones.
That’s the origin of the “gamma” value in color spaces. There’s a non-linear relationship, biased toward zero, in how light levels are encoded and displayed.
The issue you’re describing is more related to exposure. Our eyes, like most optical devices, can only see a limited overall range of light at any time. So, **we can’t see very dark and very bright things at the same time.**
1
buttchugrefereeMar 28, 2026
+1
>How much of their audience do they think watches tv in cinema conditions??!
They don't care....
1
Im-A-Tomato-1744Mar 28, 2026
+1
I know, I've commented that elsewhere. Doesn't make it any easier to swallow.
1
AnomuumiMar 28, 2026
+3
Watching 4k HDR on 2000s HD Ready TV: why is this so dark?
3
SneakyRonin581Mar 28, 2026
+2
i hate when i cant see what is happening in a show
2
BILLCLINTONMASKMar 28, 2026
+3
Because “people complaining about it on Listnook” is not “everybody”
3
PreferenceAnxious449Mar 28, 2026
+1
I am not complaining.
So i dispute your premise.
1
TVxStrangeMar 28, 2026
+2
More people should learn how to calibrate their screens.
Television shows are also best viewed on a calibrated television, rather than an iPad, laptop or phone screen. Not saying those can't be good quality screens, but it's not exactly the intended format.
2
inadapteMar 28, 2026
+1
people still watch those movies and they saved money and time during production
1
AleroRatkingMar 28, 2026
+1
Because most people don't care.
1
dztruthseekMar 28, 2026
+1
I switched to OLED and now everything is beautiful.
Also, most media will be overly compressed over the internet. There isn't anything they or you can do.
1
milk4allMar 28, 2026
+1
I’ve never heard anyone say that outside of niche tv/cinema forums/subs
1
redynair1Mar 28, 2026
+1
I just started Mike and nick and nick and Alice on Hulu. Looked dark and terrible, as you said. Switched to Disney plus about 10 minutes in and it looked MUCH better. I've heard of streamers having different settings or whatever, but it was the first time I actually witnessed it.
1
nova_crystallisMar 28, 2026
+1
Fallout looks amazing. I also liked how Young Sherlock was shot. Just two recent examples.
1
wetrysohardMar 28, 2026
+1
Sorry do you need a new tv?
1
lispwriterMar 28, 2026
+1
Because for some reason the entertainment industry does what they want now and they don’t listen to feedback. It’s ego on some level…acting like they can’t fail.
1
Glass_Ad9489Mar 28, 2026
+1
There are some movies that are so dark I can barely see the faces.
1
trymorecookiesMar 28, 2026
+1
My info from watching Corridor Crew: It's a cost decision, not quality. The lighting allows more options in post-production, so effects planning can be eliminated and decided after filming, making a shorter schedule for the more expensive people.
1
Bearded_PipMar 29, 2026
+1
The people in charge are running financial scams, not tv or movie making companies.
1
PocketNicksMar 29, 2026
+1
TV shows mostly look great on my setups, I haven't heard of all these people complaining about it either.
Try calibrating your displays properly and the shows will look the way they're intended.
1
ghotierMar 29, 2026
+1
Because everyone does it so there's no alternative.
1
sarcaster632Mar 29, 2026
+1
Streamed content over a questionable network on a $200 Black Friday special looks like junk, yes
1
Hot_Selection7679Mar 29, 2026
+1
it is honestly infuriating how they keep chasing this fake gritty realism by nuking the color palette. producers think we all have five thousand dollar oled setups in pitch black rooms when most of us are just trying to watch something on a normal screen with a bit of sunlight. they are so obsessed with looking like a prestige drama that they forget movies used to actually have a visual identity. now everything just looks like it was dragged through a gray filter and forgotten in the basement. it is lazy and makes the art look completely indistinguishable.
1
Ok_Mathematician6075Mar 29, 2026
+1
are you guys bitching about a hue? f*** off.
1
WeslockeMar 29, 2026
+1
I always thought that the current trend of dark movies/episodes was too help hide cgi flaws/cut down on effect budget.
1
wartgoodMar 29, 2026
+1
I'm more upset over c*** audio balance, but both things suck.
1
Teestow21Mar 29, 2026
+1
The comments are far in arrears.
1
lightsaberfingersMar 29, 2026
+1
The pipe is built and laid we are kinda stuck with it for a bit till there is a reason to change it
1
h0g0Mar 29, 2026
+1
Because most people are idiots
1
thefrogmanMar 29, 2026
+1
I think posts like this should be required to cite actual examples.
1
miggyukMar 29, 2026
+1
Lots of filming is in digital and it does suffer with dark scenes and shadows. As good as a lot of smart tv's are(full UHD+4K)the dark scenes are annoying. Have you noticed how well a film from the 50s and 60s looks good on today's tv's (filmed in technocolour) like Cleopatra and other biblical films because dark scenes where filmed with overhead dimmed lights that gave the impression of darkness but you had just enough light to see what was going on.
People like yourself have been complaining for years about this subject but film makers are not listening.
1
My_alias_is_too_lonMar 29, 2026
+1
The attitude of the people who make TV is more or less one of "People are stupid and don't know what they really want; they'll like whatever we tell them to."
1
MidwestTroy92Mar 29, 2026
+1
Started watching something on Peacock the other night and I legit thought my TV was broken. Had to crank the brightness up just to see peoples faces. Everything looks like it was filmed through a dirty window now and I dont get why they think thats a good look
1
tfhermobwoaywayMar 29, 2026
+1
Because we aren’t artists.
1
NilNowMar 29, 2026
+1
Generally, I don’t think it looks that bad…? When something has ultra bright colors it feels dated to me like it’s from the 90s or an auteur deliberately doing something different.
1
CasanovaJones82Mar 28, 2026
+2
The same reason everything is going to shit. No one will stop paying for it so why change it? It's infuriating. And this applies to so much that is shit right now.
2
-ClayburnMar 28, 2026
+1
My understanding is it's a cost-cutting measure. And we live in a capitalist society, so profitable and c**** will always be better than good.
Essentially things are shot to look very dull and generic with muted colors so that it's easy to color correct and match scenes in post-production. It also makes VFX cheaper because they don't have to account for unusual or dynamic lighting and colors. Also, to save money a lot of the whole process has been turned into "gig economy" bullshit, so usually when shooting the director won't even know what the VFX will actually be because that team isn't hired yet and will be whatever overseas company gives the cheapest bid. Meanwhile production has to continue anyway because they're only going to be shooting for a few weeks so they don't have to keep cast and crew under long term contracts.
The end is stale garbage, but it's c**** to make and people watch it anyway.
1
skottaoMar 28, 2026
+1
The most likely answer. Never underestimate the reasons for enshitification is down to cheapness.
1
quothe_the_mavenMar 28, 2026
+1
For a lot of shows, it hides shitty/c**** cgi. Tons of shows that that you would never expect have quite a bit of it. Companies wont spend to build sets any more, but they also don’t want to pay for competent vfx.
1
MakabajonesMar 28, 2026
+1
Money
1
VagueSomethingMar 28, 2026
+1
The people behind it don't value your opinion, the people who make financial decisions don't want to spend money to fix it.
1
ryohazuki224Mar 28, 2026
+1
I hope at some point the directors, editors, and cinematographers will get the message. You have to also understand that with modern digital production, they feel they have such a wide dynamic range in terms of being able to color grade the footage after the fact, that everything is fine to just shoot in low light, "natural" light, and that directors no long have to flood a scene with tons of light because of older digital sensors and film before that which had troubles with low light scenes.
And also, the editors that finalize the shots, they typically work on really expensive refrence monitors that also have high dynamic range, and so the final results that they see isn't anything like what the majority of home viewers see on our TVs.
Keep making noise, they're bound to listen some day!
Just yesterday I saw a guy post a reel where he re-color graded the new Moana live action trailer to be more bright and vibrant, and how everyone in the comments were like "send this to Disney NOW! They need to know that we prefer THIS compared to the dull trailer they put out!"
1
Underwater_KarmaMar 28, 2026
-2
Same reason tv shows and movies use so much shaky cam that everyone hates. Film school hacks are desperately chasing artistry by formula because they lack actual creativity.
Viewers don't get a vote on it
-2
RaiseFold100Mar 28, 2026
Because people don't actually hate it.
0
Uvtha-Mar 28, 2026
It takes more effort and imagination to make shit look good.
0
ANK2112Mar 28, 2026
It's cheaper
0
Va1cristMar 28, 2026
It’s the streaming effect , they don’t change it because it keeps costs down
193 Comments