· 158 comments · Save ·
Questions & Help Mar 18, 2026 at 4:36 PM

Instagram to remove end-to-end encryption for private messages in May

Posted by rowrbazzle75


https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/18/instagram-to-remove-end-to-end-encryption-for-private-messages-in-may?CMP=share_btn_url

🚩 Report this post

158 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
organik_productions Mar 18, 2026 +2372
Never assume there's any privacy in a meta app
2372
The_Poster_Nutbag Mar 18, 2026 +302
I was going to say, anyone sending sensitive info over meta chats is just asking for it.
302
Aazadan Mar 18, 2026 +47
Over any messaging app, pgp encrypt the message itself. That way the contents are encrypted even if the app is compromised.
47
xenophonf Mar 19, 2026 +30
Oh yeah PGP that's super practical 🙄
30
z-tayyy Mar 19, 2026 +24
I’ve PGP’d this comment and it is now invisible to bad guys.
24
yucko-ono Mar 19, 2026 +6
Don’t forget your 7 proxies
6
PontiffRexxx Mar 20, 2026
The hacker 4chan would like a word
0
2centpiece Mar 19, 2026 +4
Gonna PGP encrypt the reels I send to my friends.
4
laplongejr Mar 20, 2026 +2
[Relevant xkcd: #1181 (PGP)](https://xkcd.com/1181/)
2
Aazadan Mar 20, 2026 +1
It’s what I was thinking of when writing my comment actually.
1
Lost_Serve_7717 Mar 18, 2026 +68
Or in any online activity. The oligarchs/tech bros are happy to monitor the peasantry for dear leader.
68
schaudhery Mar 18, 2026 +26
Yet people swear by WhatsApp. Make it make sense.
26
Flexuasive Mar 18, 2026 +23
People swear by Whatsapp's current encryption, as they should. It's really good. I doubt many people are swearing by a Meta app otherwise. Everyone who praises its encryption is aware of its fickle existence.
23
speculatrix Mar 19, 2026 +6
It's perfectly possible that the WhatsApp client app does use end to end encryption and the communication cannot be intercepted by anyone not even Meta. It's also perfectly possible that meta have been forced to add a back door to the WhatsApp app to make key recovery possible, or turn on sending a copy of all messages to a third party. Unless the source code and build chain have been audited, you can't trust the app.
6
schaudhery Mar 18, 2026 +9
WhatsApp uses the same encryption as Signal while iMessage uses its own system but if you ask anyone outside the US they’ll say WhatsApp it’s the greatest thing ever.
9
takesthebiscuit Mar 18, 2026 +17
It pretty much is, I connect to a suppler base of over 100 global clients and much of the communication is via WhatsApp
17
Gonstackk Mar 18, 2026 +6
Someone in another post stated whatsapp allows people to text each other for free (outside the US text apparently have a cost) where as here in the US texts messages are generally unlimited with most plans. Now why whatsapp over some other app, no clue, someone more familiar with its use would need to chime in.
6
Qwerty2511 Mar 19, 2026 +5
Because it was one of the first popular internet messaging apps and therefore has a network effect compared to apps like Signal.
5
Pawtuckaway Mar 20, 2026 +2
Having lived in a few countries where this is the case, it usually is not just whatsapp. Phone plans will give free data for several messaging apps (whatsapp, FB messenger, etc). Whatsapp is just one of the more popular ones.
2
schaudhery Mar 18, 2026 -9
iMessage to iMessage is free regardless of where the person is, granted only iPhone users can do that.
-9
tdaun Mar 19, 2026 +19
Which is why WhatsApp is so prevalent outside of the US, especially in lower income countries, most users are on Android, so WhatsApp gets rid of any free texting barriers.
19
bluecollarbiker Mar 19, 2026 +1
iMessage counts against your data limit, unlike in many countries where WhatsApp is exempt/does not count against your data limit.
1
User-no-relation Mar 18, 2026 +5
but the comment is >Never assume there's any privacy in a meta app so >People swear by Whatsapp's current encryption, as they should. It's really good. contradicts that quite directly
5
Flexuasive Mar 18, 2026 +12
There's privacy - currently. And it's a very robust system. This privacy can disappear at any time, however. Two things can be correct simultaneously without contradicting each other.
12
laplongejr Mar 20, 2026 +1
Not exactly. You shouldn't **assume** WhatsApp has privacy. But WhatsApp *current* encryption is good. It's not an assumption. That doesn't mean your local key is private, or that a future version wouldn't remove encryption at all.
1
User-no-relation Mar 20, 2026 +1
what app or software company should I assume has privacy?
1
laplongejr Mar 20, 2026 +1
Well, nothing that's closed-source, for starters.
1
hikeit233 Mar 18, 2026 +18
Most of the world uses meta based WhatsApp for their primary message service.
18
ThinkThankThonk Mar 19, 2026 +12
And they should all heed the advice
12
composedofidiot Mar 19, 2026 +1
They don't have to worry about meta in many countries, they have to worry about the police saying unlock this now or get it back in 8 months after we do the forensics.
1
Quick_Persimmon_4436 Mar 18, 2026 +3
I can't believe anyone with even minimal brain activity uses anything from that company.
3
Tannerb8000 Mar 18, 2026 +21
Is Craigslist still a thing in your area? I'm jealous, marketplace is the only reason I still have a Facebook account
21
Atticusxj Mar 18, 2026 +4
Im in Canada and am thankful kijiji is still around.
4
Northerne30 Mar 18, 2026 +3
Kijiji is around but on life support. They made a series of bad decisions a few years back - trying to force vehicles onto the separate kijijiautos app and revamping the app and breaking all search/save functionality for literal years. I don't know if it's even fixed yet but all my saved searches are still broken and missing half their filter criteria. In the meantime though, they lost massive ground to marketplace. Hell, even Autotrader seems to have more listed than Kijiji these days.
3
laplongejr Mar 20, 2026 +1
I still use Facebook to order from compagnies who don't take phone anymore. :(
1
IndecisiveTuna Mar 18, 2026 +1
Same. It's been the easiest for buying and selling. Literally no one uses craigslist or anything else in my area.
1
battlebeez Mar 18, 2026 +2
I can't even delete Facebook from my phone. Just disable it.
2
sdforbda Mar 18, 2026 -27
FB forced this feature on me somehow and I never enacted it. So I can't even see messages that I was trying to print out as part of an album for the girl that was in marriage talks with. But we broke up anyways so... Lol
-27
zakabog Mar 18, 2026 +20
> So I can't even see messages that I was trying to print out as part of an album for the girl that was in marriage talks with. You mean your girlfriend/fiance? Or was this more of a transaction...?
20
sdforbda Mar 18, 2026 -18
Fiance almost at the time. Never done anything transactionally. Just lost access to messages when it asked for a code that I never set up. Several of my other FB friends/family it happened with as well but it wasn't much of a loss there. I just wanted to save some from the girl that I was with so that I could make a memory book because she loved stuff like that and always did lil personal things for me.
-18
zakabog Mar 18, 2026 +6
"the girl that was in marriage talks with." is just an odd way to say "the girl I was dating"/"my girlfriend" except in the case where you haven't actually met this person yet and have only been talking about marriage with.
6
sdforbda Mar 18, 2026 -29
Respectfully I don't give a f*** what you think about how I said it. But if your little gossip girl ass needs to know I said it that way because it's easier to keep it separated than "the girl I went to bed with and woke up with" daily or whatever. Yes, my ex. We had talked about marriage, she was my girlfriend. Now go prance your feet or whatever your zesty self does. Go learn how to actually cook a steak or something loser.
-29
zakabog Mar 18, 2026 +17
> the girl I went to bed with and woke up with" daily or whatever "The girl I was dating"
17
sdforbda Mar 18, 2026 -13
Pay me if you want me to post the way that you'd like kid.
-13
Quick_Persimmon_4436 Mar 18, 2026 +6
Look, I just happened upon this conversation, and how you describe your girlfriend is hilarious. So I'll at least give you an up vote for making me laugh as the world is falling apart.
6
sdforbda Mar 18, 2026 -3
I will say that it was stated a bit awkwardly but it honestly brings a lot back when I say my ex or whatever. It's been a rough day in that regard. You can care about somebody and still not want to hear from them. I'll leave it at that for everyone here. Going to guess most of the people other than you probably haven't been with a girl.
-3
Bob_A_Feets Mar 19, 2026 +1
Homie was trying to mail order a bride and managed to f*** that up lol…
1
sdforbda Mar 19, 2026
Homie hasn't been with a girl
0
exophades Mar 18, 2026 +1191
Instagram to be removed, then.
1191
DoubleJumps Mar 18, 2026 +334
The platform is already a shell of what it once was. I don't know anybody who gets even a third of the sort of real human views or attention with posts that they did a few years ago
334
Walmartian_Beta Mar 18, 2026 +276
The app had an update at one point, and after that update, I noticed my likes dropped from maybe 10-15 per post to absolute zero. Not even my husband liked my photos anymore. I asked him if he'd seen anything I'd posted in the last week, and he said he hadn't. I realized I hadn't seen anything from my real-life friends in a while, either, so I started looking at their pages one by one, and guess what - none of their posts were showing up in my feed at all! I couldn't see them, they couldn't see me. If you aren't paying for engagement or gaming the hashtags, nobody will see what you post anymore on that app - it used to be a fun place to go and connect with actual friends, now it's all ads and promoted content.
276
GoblinRightsNow Mar 18, 2026 +151
Exactly what happened to Facebook. The feed changed from being your friend's recent activity to a million content farms, ads and rage bait. 
151
Walmartian_Beta Mar 18, 2026 +27
I really miss seeing what my pals are up to. I don't care about Balyn whatever and her Tourette's, and I don't know why so much of my feed is of her.
27
sadandshy Mar 18, 2026 +3
facebook purity extension is a wonderful thing
3
ApteryxAustralis Mar 18, 2026 +23
I think it was about a year ago (Feb 2025, I think). That’s when I noticed my engagement drop. Not a huge deal for me (amateur bird photographer sharing what I see 2-3 times a week), but I feel bad for people that need it for their actual businesses. Ngl, it is kinda sad to post a cool bird picture and have it get 5 likes whereas a year and a half ago it would’ve gotten a dozen or more.
23
DoubleJumps Mar 18, 2026 +59
There were three identifiable points in the last year and a half where they did something like an update and suddenly engagement would just collapse. I have 25,000 followers on my account and I would be lucky if even 5% of them saw a post. Now it's less than that. There was a point last year where one of the bigwigs that Instagram was like straight up laughing at an interview when somebody brought up. How much distress this was causing to people and small businesses.. I don't see things from a lot of the people that I follow very often. I know that it also punishes you if you aren't posting reels because they want to compete with tick tock so bad that the entire purpose of the app, sharing photos, is now discouraged.
59
AsianButBig Mar 19, 2026 +10
Social media doesn't exist anymore. It's just interest media now, it shows you what it thinks you're interested in, not what you want to see.
10
TbonerT Mar 19, 2026 +5
For years, I’ve been hiding or blocking pages that aren’t my friends, so Facebook only shows my friends and groups. Every once in a while, it starts showing me random pages again, so I block them. After a couple of days, my feed is back to friends only.
5
EggyT0ast Mar 19, 2026 +1
and this encourages people to stop posting, as well. i send videos and pics to my extended family group chat now (using plain sms or whatever they're called now). it's a nice trick, isn't it, that by not showing anyone any content they've convinced people to pay Meta to 'boost' their posts.
1
ihazaredditaccount Mar 18, 2026 +18
Part of Instagram’s identity used to be square photos, and now they’ve become vertical videos.
18
DoubleJumps Mar 18, 2026 +7
I really hate it, because I use Instagram primarily to promote a small business, and the amount of time it takes to make this tiktok style short form video bullshit is way longer than it would take to just get nice photos of things. Like I design and produce physical products, there's not a whole lot of crazy things you can do with videos to promote those things, but the app demands I do it or it deprioritizes my stuff..
7
nanobot_1000 Mar 18, 2026 +38
Huge uptick in AI-generated thirst traps, none of the smoothbrains in the comments seem to care or notice (or are bots too)
38
organik_productions Mar 19, 2026 +1
I've noticed these appearing constantly in my recommended accounts now, and it always says it has a "mutual follower" but it's some random profile picture I don't recognise.
1
EggyT0ast Mar 19, 2026 +1
Real people can't comment, to be fair. One of my friends made a video that used one of my songs (it's professionally released) and tagged me. I commented "Thank you for using my song!" and it was auto-moderated as "going against community standards."
1
Aware-Instance-210 Mar 18, 2026 +21
Anything Zuckerberg touches turns into worthless shit. Facebook had 1, maybe 2 good years. Then it went all downhill and that dude went completely bonkers.
21
DoubleJumps Mar 18, 2026 +6
I still use Facebook for business, but I'm getting really close to stopping. I was talking with some other people recently and I was asking them if they were even saying people who were under 30 on Facebook. You pretty much aren't.
6
Massive-Rate-2011 Mar 18, 2026 +1
It's probably better to be on bluesky and just google, as shitty as google is.
1
luihgi Mar 18, 2026 +1
almost all content there is now turning into short videos. it used to be a picture app
1
ReaditTrashPanda Mar 19, 2026 +1
Short form media, like this has shown to be the most consistently addictive…
1
Mahaleck Mar 18, 2026 +82
Press X to doubt. Let’s face it most people won’t care.
82
Oceansize757 Mar 18, 2026 +34
I don’t care cuz I don’t use instagram, does that count?
34
Lasto44 Mar 19, 2026
No. We’re obviously talking about people who already use it
0
Sledgehammer617 Mar 19, 2026 +1
This is a huge deal, all my friends are leaving it.
1
Equivalent-Battle973 Mar 18, 2026 +6
It is the worst hive of scum and villainy I have ever seen and its gotten soo much worse. Blatant nazis spewing hate speech, racism and ableism through the f****** roof. Along with horrible sexism... f*** idk why I am still on it.
6
chowindown Mar 19, 2026 +2
I haven't seen that at all - I don't doubt it's on there, but my feed is pretty much all based on my interests.
2
ICPcrisis Mar 19, 2026 +2
I took it off my phone and still have my account that I view from browser. My usage has dropped like 10x. It’s been great.
2
brnccnt7 Mar 18, 2026 +406
“Instagram will stop encrypting private messages between users from May, after enduring years of criticism from law enforcement and child safety groups over the feature.” The same politicians who are predators on our children?
406
Mirria_ Mar 18, 2026 +87
"For the children!" has been a rallying cry of the police state. But not actually a goal.
87
GauchoWink Mar 18, 2026 +61
Another reason to abandon all Meta platforms.
61
BonsaiBohemian Mar 18, 2026 +198
And WhatsApp soon to follow? Bye 👋
198
DeanXeL Mar 18, 2026 +107
I JUST got one of those Whatsapp update messages saying all messages and videos and pictures are E2E encrypted. Maybe just a European thing?
107
BonsaiBohemian Mar 18, 2026 +37
Haven’t received that in Canada, but Europe’s GDPR laws are far superior to PIPEDA so I’m not shocked (and not to mention anything south of us…)
37
apparex1234 Mar 18, 2026 +20
I did receive that message in Canada
20
mental_reincarnation Mar 18, 2026 +8
I’m in the US and just got it
8
PokemonTrainerSilver Mar 18, 2026 -9
Don’t worry, once they have a working quantum computer they’re going to crack everyone’s encrypted info anyways
-9
Gurlllllllll- Mar 18, 2026 +13
WhatsApp uses AES256, which is quantum resistant. This "the quantum computers will crack all encryption" nonsense is basically all doomsaying and marketing.
13
Rakastaakissa Mar 18, 2026 +18
I thought WhatsApp was already compromised? I remember there being a big push toward Telegram and Signal for that reason, but I could be mistaken.
18
matjoeman Mar 18, 2026 +51
Telegram has sketchy encryption and doesn't encrypt group chats at all. WhatsApp has good encryption (for now) so it's a much better choice. Signal is even better because it's not owned by FB.
51
Rakastaakissa Mar 18, 2026 +8
Yeah, telegram quickly became a no go for me. I just remember people saying not to do WhatsApp anymore when FB bought it.
8
itskdog Mar 18, 2026 +7
WhatsApp uses the Signal protocol, and the Signal devs were even involved in helping Facebook implement it, after the Snowden leaks suddenly made E2EE a priority for them.
7
FellowDeviant Mar 18, 2026 +114
Considering how many ads I get that stemmed from conversations in Messenger, this shouldn't surprise literally anybody with a Meta account that's linked together.
114
zxzxzxzxxcxxxxxxxcxx Mar 18, 2026 +31
My gf and I used messenger to chat primarily and after the break up my feed was just wall to wall therapy shit about how I’m right and my partner was the problem Assume it was the same for her too
31
look_at_tht_horse Mar 18, 2026 +16
That empathetic attitude is exactly why you were so right and they were the obvious problem.
16
The_Playbook88 Mar 18, 2026 +307
We need to boycott the app then. Its clearly aligning with the authoritarian regime for mass surveillance.
307
hoppertn Mar 18, 2026 +89
Always has been.
89
l_____I Mar 18, 2026 +15
If people haven't boycotted the app by now it's not gonna happen
15
The_Playbook88 Mar 18, 2026 +14
People haven’t boycotted Target before either. They are currently not doing so well.
14
thepianoman456 Mar 18, 2026 +4
What’s an alternative? For musicians and artists it’s an amazing promo / networking tool.
4
soft_becoming Mar 18, 2026 -2
Jesus Christ, do you think they ever had your privacy in mind? If a product is free, you are the product. Or your data is, anyway. Stop bitching and find a paid E2E chat app, and use Instagram for its limited function.
-2
MotherFunker1734 Mar 18, 2026 -43
Why do you think that their first product was called "FACE BOOK"? They always been a surveillance company in favor of totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. They are the ones providing the face book they use to track everybody.
-43
Grizzly_Andrews Mar 18, 2026 +17
They're also behind a lot of the lobbying to push state bills through that require age verification on software platforms. It's not about child safety, it's about surveillance.
17
jcv999 Mar 18, 2026 +59
Facebook was created by Zuckerberg to be a creep in college LOL. Not for some grand surveillance plan
59
OuchieMuhBussy Mar 18, 2026 -3
Unlikely, given the fact that Mark is a dumbass who has never had a good idea in his life. LifeLog was created by DARPA after 9/11. Congress got wind of the project and it was shelved, then eventually discontinued on Feb 4th, 2004. Facebook was launched on Feb 4th, 2004.
-3
MotherFunker1734 Mar 18, 2026 -22
Yeah, you should learn where he got the money and the order to turn it into a worldwide data collection machine... You are too innocent (to keep it polite) if you think that's how he got where he is now.
-22
QuacksUpForDonuts Mar 18, 2026 +21
Please do provide your sources stating that Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook 20 years ago with the intent of it being a surveillance company to help authoritarian regimes.
21
Rakastaakissa Mar 18, 2026 +1
You’re misunderstanding. He created Facebook and then the feds came calling with a bag of cash.
1
axonxorz Mar 18, 2026 +4
> You’re misunderstanding. You're misreading, the assertion was "Facebook was created by Zuckerberg to be a creep in college." What happened after isn't what's being discussed.
4
siddemo Mar 18, 2026 +2
Didn't the Winklevoss brothers create "the Facebook" and zuckerberg stole it?
2
Dariaskehl Mar 18, 2026 +5
Be fair. They didn’t start with mass surveillance as a goal. The original purpose was sexual assault, stalking, and harassment. They pivoted to surveillance to make it more profitable. 😜
5
Xycergy Mar 19, 2026
The target audience for Instagram are not the kind of people who will be bothered by privacy encroachment in the first place.
0
AvaTryingToSurvive Mar 18, 2026 +149
Intel collection. Did you say something naughty about the US government? Into the camp with you! Should have learned to do the nazi two step with the rest of the slaves. Nothing to hide nothing to fear!
149
PillowPrincess314 Mar 18, 2026 -61
Don't be that way. They just want to train their models on your private conversations. 
-61
Corporate-Scum Mar 18, 2026 +54
Spying by corporations isn’t better
54
OuchieMuhBussy Mar 18, 2026 +22
Especially when the government can side-step the 4th amendment by purchasing your data from said tech companies and data brokers.
22
PillowPrincess314 Mar 18, 2026 +21
My comment is meant to be tongue in cheek. 
21
dreadit-runfromit Mar 18, 2026 +11
I felt the tone was obvious. Sorry you're getting downvotes.
11
SpeechDistinct8793 Mar 19, 2026 +20
Just reminder that Meta, the parent company of Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram allegedly has been secretly funding the age verification campaign for websites as a way to gather more personal data from users. Facebook, a company under the Meta umbrella, was the center of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The same scandal that allowed users to be specifically targeted (using personal information from the profiles created on every single user by Facebook to determine how to keen you hooked to the platform and how susceptible you are) by fake ads by Russian bots, promoting propaganda that allegedly helped DJT win the 2016 election.
20
vincec36 Mar 18, 2026 +18
No one is buying “child safety” when the Epstein case was thrown under a rug. These lying creeps just want to spy on every American. They already do and want more. F*** em
18
tdaun Mar 18, 2026 +52
A lot of people not realizing by default you had to opt-in to end to end encryption on Instagram chat. Which has me curious how many people thought they were chatting in an encrypted chat but they weren't because they didn't enable the setting. Also never trust a large company like Meta to be protecting information you send through any of their apps. If you want actual encrypted communications then you need to use a reputable standalone service, Signal is my go to choice.
52
Angeronus Mar 18, 2026 +8
The problem with apps like these is that they are only useful to you if other people use them. Signal is great, but if none of your friends and family uses it then it is basically useless to you. Do you want to know how i mainly communicate with my closest friends? Through a common discord channel... probably an even worse choice (for privacy) than any meta app. My relatives on the other hand mainly use facebook messenger. None of them is willing to switch to Signal (or any other privacy focused app for that matter) so this automatically means that i can't use it either, even though i want to.
8
dballing Mar 19, 2026 +3
We basically switched the entire family to Signal. There was enough critical mass of family members who were like “we won’t use meta products” or “we won’t do apple/android” that Signal became the de facto solution. You have to be willing to say “I won’t be on that app. Sorry.”
3
brnccnt7 Mar 18, 2026 +3
Great point, it also isn’t supported in a lot of countries
3
Pawtuckaway Mar 20, 2026 +1
Yeah, one of the reasons given for getting rid of it is that no one ever used it. Not that I believe that is really the reason but a lot of people here getting angry that probably never even used Instagram E2E.
1
Snapingbolts Mar 18, 2026 +80
$100 says those running these "child safety groups" voted for the pedo in chief
80
Direspark Mar 18, 2026 +12
We need to ditch meta anyway. Terrible f****** company
12
ProofByVerbosity Mar 18, 2026 +15
Very easy solution to this problem...
15
hayyimsandwich Mar 18, 2026 +7
hey sheep, get in the pen!
7
Tbmadpotato Mar 18, 2026 +7
I assumed they read all of them anyway lmao
7
atom386 Mar 18, 2026 +5
So I'll be deleting my accounts by May. Cool. Got it.
5
Pawtuckaway Mar 20, 2026 -1
Did you ever actually use E2E messaging in Instagram? 99% of users never did.
-1
Acceptable-Wolf1532 Mar 18, 2026 +5
lol who would use IG or whatsapp for messaging
5
nariofthewind Mar 18, 2026 +4
I didn’t even know they have it.
4
No_Wrongdoer466 Mar 19, 2026 +3
Insane... leave now while you can.... they also track your passport id. Id, tran status,
3
PopsicleMonster Mar 18, 2026 +3
When do we reckon this happens to WhatsApp?
3
Salzus Mar 18, 2026 +3
It never had it to begin with
3
Waste_Twist1474 Mar 19, 2026 +2
Don’t you have to opt in for e2e encryption on Instagram DMs? If so then this is hilarious, loads of people wanting to boycott the app for removing something that they were 99% not using.
2
timify10 Mar 18, 2026 +2
So long Instagram... Byeeeee
2
LoudGangsta8292 Mar 19, 2026 +2
So, will they get access to old messages, or just new ones
2
Franseven Mar 19, 2026 +2
This is basically "oh chat control did not pass? Wait a minute.." please EU do something! Privacy is at risk
2
shifty_coder Mar 18, 2026 +6
Nobody reads the article. Instagram’s end-to-end encryption for messaging was an opt-in feature, and is being discontinued due to low utilization. If this is the first time you’re learning about it, you already weren’t using it.
6
00Anonymous Mar 19, 2026 +2
It's still sneaky and manipulative because e2e encryption was made default on other meta products like fbm and WhatsApp. 
2
dX_iIi_Xb Mar 18, 2026 +2
I really want them to do it with Whatsapp so I can finally persuade myself to uninstall.
2
coldenigma Mar 18, 2026 +1
Why anyone is using a Meta product at this point is baffling to me.
1
noobs1996 Mar 18, 2026 +1
Saw this coming when Xitter did it first
1
wowlock_taylan Mar 19, 2026 +1
'Private messages? What are those? It should be open to everyone!'
1
wowlock_taylan Mar 19, 2026 +1
I am glad I jumped off of Facebook and its ilk before they turned into Meta and all this c***.
1
the3rdtea2 Mar 20, 2026 +1
Literally never a reason for that. None except selling your convos or being able to hand them to law enforcement
1
Y0___0Y Mar 18, 2026 +1
Zucc Zucc will make sure Donald Dearest can read everything you message to anyone on his platform.
1
McBanj0 Mar 18, 2026
It was the worst buggy feature anyway
0
ChiefSampson Mar 18, 2026 -24
As someone who has never used Instagram this is irrelevant.
-24
ExtentOk1892 Mar 18, 2026 +2
ur comment is irrelevant then, what made u decide to type this out and hit post
2
ChiefSampson Mar 18, 2026 -4
Your face is irrelevant.
-4
[deleted] Mar 18, 2026 -97
[deleted]
-97
SpaceGerbil Mar 18, 2026 +47
You can't be a real person
47
[deleted] Mar 18, 2026 +16
[deleted]
16
[deleted] Mar 18, 2026 -25
[deleted]
-25
DuskOfANewAge Mar 18, 2026 +9
0/10 Troll. They must not sell Monster energy drinks in whatever country you're really shitposting from.
9
continuousQ Mar 18, 2026 +15
Yeah, better let the people who work for the child rapist in chief look at everyone's message so they can keep society safe.
15
← Back to Board