> At least 13 other states have agreed to provide their full voter registration data to the DOJ, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. The DOJ has sued 30 states for refusing to provide the data.
This the "small government" that Republicans wanted?
2127
o_MrBombastic_o5 days ago
+625
Yes they only ever wanted rules to protect them from accountability while punishing others they disagree with
625
Dahhhkness5 days ago
+300
"Small government" has always meant "more power in fewer hands with no system of checks, balances, or accountability."
300
HarveysBackupAccount5 days ago
+26
that and "taxation is theft"
26
New-Ad-3635 days ago
+13
That feels accurate lately
13
HarveysBackupAccount5 days ago
+3
Too true
15-20 years ago I heard about a group of people (a miniature intentional community - maybe a half dozen or dozen families) who were pacifist, so to avoid paying for war via taxes they kept their overall income (plus tax deductions) low enough that they essentially paid no income tax.
As a group they pooled resources to live as cheaply as possible. I don't know if I could do that but I admire their commitment to their principles
3
aeschenkarnos5 days ago
+2
Self-dealing isn't theft though!
2
_TheBeerBaron_5 days ago
+1
Exactly.
Small /= less powerful
Small = fewer people wielding that same power
1
secretlyloaded5 days ago
+68
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." -Frank Wilhoit
68
darwinooc5 days ago
+26
You misunderstand they want a small government made up of the and only the 1% and f*** the other 99%
26
whatproblems5 days ago
+66
funny those states were probably all the “states rights” group not too long ago
66
EbonBehelit5 days ago
+19
This comic always comes to mind:
[https://ahoyuniverse.com/post/773630795458953216/my-cartoon-for-issue-1640-of-private-eye-magazine](https://ahoyuniverse.com/post/773630795458953216/my-cartoon-for-issue-1640-of-private-eye-magazine)
19
Googleitgenius5 days ago
+24
Its all about casting a huge drag net to find voters who mailed in their vote then passed away or moved etc , then the screaming "Dead people are voting, fictious addresses etc" then you will hear
"we have no choice we have to federalize elections blah blah"
24
AlliedR25 days ago
+2
They mean "Small enough for the Federal government to push around".
2
fermat99905 days ago
+2492
Democracy was a fun experiment
2492
CSKweh5 days ago
+47
Still ongoing! Do not despair. Liberty is worth fighting for. To quote Randy Marsh, I didn’t hear no bell! 🔔
47
fermat99905 days ago
+8
Thank you very much! This helps me a lot!
Have a great day!
8
Violet_Paradox3 days ago
+3
The stakes are extremely high though. The only reason the world survived Nazi Germany is because the Allies invaded and killed/captured the key figures of the regime. If the US falls into a dictatorship, and the new Allies try the same thing, it'll erupt into a nuclear war that kills us all. If no one does anything, the US will spread its cancer to the rest of the world by force and we plunge into a new era of global tyranny. It's a fight worth having but this is the absolute final chance.
3
Disgruntled-Cacti5 days ago
+373
Been dying for decades now. Might as well put the nail in the coffin.
373
fermat99905 days ago
+99
This really crushes me!
99
Phyrexian_Archlegion5 days ago
+166
The extinction of American democracy will lead to untold suffering across the planet for generations to come. People in the future will look back on us and damn us for letting this experiment in self-governance fail.
166
thtamthrfckr5 days ago
+162
And see who they did it for, a failed businessman racist rapist nepo baby with the iq of a turnip
162
Monnster075 days ago
+41
That's an unfair comparison...turnips are actually useful.
41
thtamthrfckr5 days ago
+22
And have more nutrients than that evil narcissist has ever ingested or provided, you’re right
22
Cilph5 days ago
+2
...and the people who voted for him, who are trying to deny any kind of responsibility.
2
Slypenslyde5 days ago
+63
Honestly this kind of attitude feels like the kind of exceptionalism that's a part of why Americans are just standing around and shrugging while their freedoms are stolen one piece at a time.
Most other countries aren't Hellholes that only get luxury by the grace of the US. By many standards, there are a lot of developed nations that have a better quality of life and *have* had a better quality of life for a long time.
They aren't lining up to save the US. A lot of them are ready to stake their claim as the new world leader in whatever fields they excel in.
All the people standing around with their thumbs in their pockets saying, "It can't collapse, people will save us!" are going to be really disappointed. The only way to keep certain things is to fight for them, and the US is a nation where nobody is interested in fighting for anyone but themselves.
63
technobrendo5 days ago
+39
American exceptionalism and *greatest country on earth* was the best marketing gimmick in the history of the universe
39
Junior_Builder_43405 days ago
+3
Just like this.
https://www.artic.edu/artworks/121186/world-s-highest-standard-of-living
3
East-Ice-31995 days ago
+5
Yep. There won’t be any revolutions. There won’t be a civil war.
5
darkk415 days ago
+10
Europe thinking they will become the world leader and not that fascism will control the globe are seriously delusional.
It's not just the US on their last legs, it's western hegemony. Everyone in the world is too busy being a selfish POS to take on a world affecting problem in fascism. Hell, half of Europe sees what's happening in the US and started spending MORE money on China and Russian exports.
It's laughable that they are going to become the world leader. The time is LONG past for leaders that will tell these powers to kick rocks and focus on building lasting stability instead of putting extra money in their own pockets. We need that everywhere.
Poland is already teeing up the next Putin stooge to replace Orban, but people want you to believe that this is just a US problem and there's no reason to care in Europe.
You're not gonna like where this leads, nor is anyone else that doesn't enjoy living under a boot.
10
badnuub5 days ago
+8
But how else could they act smug on the internet while their countries are embracing etho nationalism?
8
Cyrano_Knows5 days ago
+12
I did it for decades with 1930's Germans.
Never once paused to consider the idea that they might have hated Hitler.
12
Low_Pickle_1125 days ago
+33
Doubtful. They'll probably look back at us and damn us for all the coups, wars, and other horrible things we did for over a century to countless millions in the name of rich scumbags all while saying "We are freedom and democracy."
33
waffle_iron_maiden5 days ago
+8
The world will move on without us, other countries still have functioning democracies they do not need ours to stay for theirs to work. Our country is not a shining beacon or example, we haven't done too many things better than countries aside from military power. The country has been behind the curve of other developed countries with things like civil rights and citizen welfare. When other developed countries have had free healthcare established for a while now, the US has been playing one step forward two steps back for decades. It leads you to wonder what have we really done that makes us a country others should look up to? Free speech was nice, it wasn't isolated to the US though.
The US has certainly driven advancements in science, particularly during the space race, but those days are over. I believe there was a time when the US meant something to some countries, but to anyone following its history the US has been driven by war for profiteering and control for a very long time. That has always been visible
8
kingtacticool5 days ago
+3
Yeah, its going to make the wasteland pretty uncomfortable when it comes to story time around the fire.
3
Embarrassed_Age85545 days ago
+2
Take good care of your portable phonograph and make sure you have enough needles. Thorns don't cut it.
2
fermat99905 days ago
+9
And marvel at how easily it failed
9
m1ster_frundles5 days ago
+2
lmao holy f*** the exceptionalism in this comment. There's a whole civilized world outside of the US, you should try experiencing it.
2
RobotPhoto5 days ago
+2
don't let it. This super passive depressive shit is probably from Russian or Israili Bots.
2
Tapprunner5 days ago
+19
It's definitely dead.
Democracy is like a parachute - if it doesn't work pretty much how it's supposed to everytime, you don't really have one.
Not every election needs to be rigged for it to still not count as a functional democracy, just as your parachute only needs to fail once to kill you.
19
LittleKitty2351 day ago
+2
I call my reserve chute Canada
2
stitchface665 days ago
+1
i mean, some never got it.
1
Various-Salt4884 days ago
+1
If it’s important to you, you’ll fight for it.
1
Kitagawasans5 days ago
+39
How is technocracy or oligarchy the same as democracy? It’s been over since Regan. Since politicians have been paid for and by corps. This isn’t democracy anymore. It’s not comparable. But it can be brought back. Pretty sure people out number the rich ghouls 99.99 to 1.
39
ScienceWilly5 days ago
+25
If only the 99.99% would get up off their asses and do something. I wonder how bad things have to get before the breaking point, and what plans the ghouls have in place as we approach it.
25
SplendidPunkinButter5 days ago
+7
Of course it can be brought back. It didn’t exist at all in 1775. The problem is usually bringing it back requires something like a big war or other catastrophe where lots of people die.
7
CainPillar5 days ago
+1
Their bots outnumber you even more.
1
[deleted]5 days ago
+6
[deleted]
6
Less_Tacos5 days ago
+13
Really happy I don't have children.
13
raptorlightning4 days ago
+2
Democracy can only survive if you're willing to water the tree of liberty.
2
fermat99904 days ago
+1
How do you do that?
1
GetsBetterAfterAFew5 days ago
+925
My state Wyoming was the 1st to openly share voter data, our Secretary of State Chuck Gray a nepo baby loser whose dad funded his campaign, is a Trump loyalist. Chuck Gray and his bold 4'11" balding frame had a radio show on his daddys radio station rose to fame over discussing voting illegalities and drop boxes, in a state that is 90% Republicans with one drop box in the SOS office bolted to the wall.
925
PigFarmer15 days ago
+223
"I'm Chuck Gray and my daddy *didn't* pay for this message."
223
malhans5 days ago
+128
Wyoming is such an ironic state to complain about voter illegalities. 90% of the people you talk to will be voting republican and have no mind to hear a different opinion. And yet, it’s like some people aren’t radically republican enough. It’s insane.
(I am from Wyoming but no longer live there so I’m not talking entirely out of my ass)
128
Windfade5 days ago
+101
I can't believe 20% of Wyoming's population showed up to this thread.
101
malhans5 days ago
+17
Imagine my surprise opening this thread and seeing someone mention Wyoming first! (what’s even crazier is how many people from the state I know that ended up in the area I moved to)
17
inwondermentofwinter5 days ago
+1
I mean it's 2 people it's not that crazy
1
Anlysia5 days ago
+25
Wyoming is an ironic state to complain about federal voting at all because they have 2 senators and 1 congressman too many.
25
JustHereForCookies175 days ago
+14
That's probably a hilarious joke if you live somewhere with representation, but it sounds really shitty to someone who lives in DC and doesn't have any voting representation on Capitol Hill, but somehow needs Congress to approve our annual city budget.
14
malhans5 days ago
+2
2 senators is mandated by the great compromise of 1787 and 1 representative in the house is the minimum as mandated by the constitution. Makes sense where you’re coming from in theory, but why exactly does Wyoming deserve no representation? Because of how the system was constructed over 200 years ago?
You can critique the system without saying that Wyoming deserves to have no representation in the government. I’m happy to criticize Wyoming all day everyday but for as many people who talk about the voting power of Wyoming compared to somewhere else, no one really brings up how no one gives a shit about winning Wyomings votes. They’re basically worthless already.
I hear you on the irritation but it is actually bonkers to say that there’s too many congressman when that is literally the minimum that is written into the constitution.
2
JustHereForCookies175 days ago
+5
As someone who lives in a non-state (DC) with NO Congressional voting power, thank you for this comment.
5
malhans5 days ago
+2
Absolutely! I hate this idea that a place being low population or small (dc) means no representation is deserved.
It’s actually insane to me that DC has no congressional voting power.
2
Turambar875 days ago
+5
A lot of those big empty states should be consolidated.
5
InquisitiveGamer5 days ago
+3
I'm sure they were sharing data back in the day before electronic information as well behind closed doors.
3
AdAnxious88425 days ago
+432
Yet, at least 30 other states are resisting the DoJ request. Iowa could have been one of them.
This sounds more like a GOP "I can have my cake and eat it too" scenario. Complain about the process but go along to help the administration's voter suppression plans.
432
iamthenite5 days ago
+59
I live in Iowa and honestly I’m surprised they waited this long to do this. All branches of government are red here and our governor has been shamelessly trying to suck up to Trump since his first term. Sucks here.
59
ImOutWanderingAround5 days ago
+12
They were probably negotiating the quid pro quo.
12
Jeedeye5 days ago
+9
She keeps trying but she's often too drunk to take the hints she isn't wanted.
9
Dahhhkness5 days ago
+206
This is why there are no "good Republicans".
Some may tut-tut about *process* and the like, but in the end, there is nothing but a desire for permanent power. This DOJ has *nothing* but malevolent intentions for the future of voting, and handing over data to them can only serve the GOP's designs.
206
Cyrano_Knows5 days ago
+52
Department of Justice run by Trump's ex-personal defense lawyer who stopped cold any release and any prosecution of the Epstein Files.
52
Ready-Ad61135 days ago
+264
Citizens own representatives have betrayed them. They will be targeting people who vote against the regime. There’s a reason why they’re building so many camps and it’s not for immigrants.
264
o_MrBombastic_o5 days ago
+73
They never pretended to be your representative or to have good intentions towards their opposition and when the time comes your Republican neighbors, coworkers, friends and family won't stand with you they will turn you in start treating them appropriately
73
Brother_J_La_la5 days ago
+24
They can skip the camp and send me straight to the showers. I've done more in service of this country than any of these pigfuckers. We're all gonna have to nut-up before this year is over.
24
MrInexorable5 days ago
+68
> "We are legally obligated to comply with the request, but we do not take the obligation to turn this information over lightly," Pate said in a statement.
The [1993 NVRA](https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2/text) he's citing was written to limit what the federal government can pressure states into, not enable it. Thirty other Secretaries of State read the same statute and landed on the opposite conclusion about what's legally required. "Legally obligated", PFFFFFFT
68
Altruistic_Koala_1225 days ago
+26
**Republicans want a Totalitarian Regime. Small government to them is just their party ruling over everyone.**
26
Lonely_Noyaaa5 days ago
+51
> We are legally obligated to comply with the request, but we do not take the obligation to turn this information over lightly.
Secretary of State said this while handing over sensitive data including Social Security numbers for roughly 2 million voters. If he has serious concerns, why cave so quickly instead of fighting like other states are doing?
51
Hellstorm9015 days ago
+21
I really don’t know why Trumps opponents keep saying just wait until the elections and we’ll vote him out
Everything he’s doing from collecting voter data to flooding his political opponents states with external federal police and troops loyal to him and only him speaks volumes of a man who is not going to entertain the idea of there being another election
When the time for election draws near watch how quickly another imaginary terror group like “Cartel De Los Soles” appears and that this never before heard of group will entirely be composed of all the people on the voter lists who happen to vote for anyone not him
(Cartel De Los Soles doesn’t actually exist in Venezuela, it was just a nickname used by Venezuelans to refer to a group of corrupt military officers with the Soles, translation “Sun,” referring to the emblem on their military uniforms, Trump made it into a scary “Narco Terrorist” group in order to have an “Enemy” for his invocation of war powers)
21
AhBee15 days ago
+19
Greg Abbott gleefully handed Texas voter info over. He's so excited to support the Epstein administration and do his part to disenfranchise millions of us. He finds out what the people want and need and then does the opposite. His sole purpose, like all red state cult members, is to serve Donald Trump.
19
rhetheo1005 days ago
+52
They can’t win on merit.. so they connive and steal. A treasonous act
52
Solid_College_91451 day ago
+1
**What do Trump and the Republicans intend to do with the sensitive voter data from states that they are aquiring?**
Short answer: they plan to use those state voter files and linked data to target, mobilize, and challenge votes — i.e., voter microtargeting, turnout operations, fundraising/communications, voter‑roll management, and legal/ballot‑challenge work.
Key uses (concise):
* Microtargeting and persuasion: combine state voter files with commercial data to build detailed voter profiles for tailored ads, mail, calls, and GOTV messaging.
* Turnout and get‑out‑the‑vote (GOTV): prioritize contacts and resources toward persuadable or likely supporters to boost turnout.
* Fundraising and donor targeting: match voting records with consumer/donor data to identify likely contributors and optimize asks.
* Voter‑roll maintenance and challenges: identify inactive, duplicate, or out‑of‑precinct registrations to prepare legal challenges or purges where permitted.
* Message testing and analytics: run experiments to find most effective messaging and delivery channels.
* Coordination with allied groups: share or license data among campaigns, party committees, and allied PACs/NGOs to coordinate efforts.
* Legal/defense prep: use data to investigate alleged fraud, prepare litigation, or support recounts/challenges.
Limitations and risks:
* Legal and state rules vary: some states restrict commercial use or resale; access can require credentials and agreement to state terms.
* Privacy and public‑opinion concerns: combining public voter files with consumer databases raises privacy and ethical issues and invites scrutiny.
* Accuracy limits: commercial data and modeling can be imperfect; misuse can backfire politically or legally.
1
Klepdar5 days ago
+16
Blanche and Bondi both belong in f****** prison.
16
jquas215 days ago
+56
Trying to steal, gerrymander, and rig the elections against the people’s will. It’s funny how republicans and Trump are so pro regulation and big government when it comes to the people’s right to vote.
No way a motor voter laws could pass with these republicans in congress and those judges throughout the federal judiciary.
56
ObviouslyRealPerson5 days ago
+59
Yeah! Lick those boots Iowa!
59
Embarrassed_Age85545 days ago
+24
Our governor Reynolds loves the taste of Trump's shoes in the morning.
24
Cynykl5 days ago
+1
> shoes
You misspelled ballsack.
1
Embarrassed_Age85545 days ago
+2
Why not both?
2
King_James_775 days ago
+11
If this ends, can we sue the heritage foundation?
11
Vegetable-Error-20685 days ago
+1
Sue?
I hope that's not the only tool in your toolbox.
1
King_James_774 days ago
+3
Before you talk about my toolbox, I hope you can voice yours. Cuz last I did I got suspended.
3
MrMichaelJames5 days ago
+27
Time for voters in these states to start suing the state and the Feds.
27
GoodGuyCap5 days ago
+11
As an Iowan, I am so happy my state did this. I am sure there is no negatives to such actions!
/s.
I f****** hate it here.
11
Embarrassed_Age85545 days ago
+1
Well, we can't say they're hiding their true colors.
1
JesusWuta40oz5 days ago
+12
Its so they can decide which states and which voting poll places to send ICE and intimidate voter turn out.
12
l_rufus_californicus5 days ago
+10
>"...[D]ata will be protected appropriately under federal law, and we expect them to uphold that promise."
*laughs in depressed Iowa* Uh huh. I'm sure it will.
10
The-1st-One5 days ago
+9
>At least 13 other states have agreed to provide their full voter registration data to the DOJ, according to the [Brennan Center for Justice](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/tracker-justice-department-requests-voter-information). The DOJ has sued 30 states for refusing to provide the data.
Iowans should counter sue to not have their private data strewn about by this farce.
9
Alwayssunnyinarizona5 days ago
+44
Imagine if Biden had done this.
44
drproc905 days ago
+104
If the paedophile protection party ever loses power then Dems need to turn this on its head.
Every registered republican for the 2024 cycle added to the sex offenders register.
104
wasteymclife5 days ago
+9
Take it all the way, gerrymander conservative votes into oblivion. The right keeps setting new ROE like they don't expect a fight ever. Though let's be honest they've been right so far. (Elected officials I mean, people have been showing out all over the country).
9
Ok_Anywhere_78285 days ago
+24
And every sex offender now a registered republican
24
sonic_couth5 days ago
+27
It seems that it can be fairly assumed that every Republican is ok with pedophilia now.
27
LazySwayze5 days ago
+7
Aren't they already?
7
ThrownAway17Years5 days ago
+9
I could be wrong, but I thought this process change is possible but only with legislation from Congress? So another case of the executive overreaching and bypassing the people.
9
-waveydavey-5 days ago
+9
Those that released it should go to prison
9
LSX33995 days ago
+7
People are still way too casually ushering in fascism.
7
InvisiblePinkUnic0rn5 days ago
+7
Weird how so many people and governments went so fast and all in on federal boot licking
7
CheetahSerious71695 days ago
+5
...what the f*** do we even do?
5
Quest-guy5 days ago
+7
Some “small government” Am I right?
7
MaximumJim_5 days ago
+8
Big government Republicans are aiding their fellow big government Republicans.
8
Turkino5 days ago
+7
Most overt and coordinated power grab I've ever seen short of a military coup or that South Korean president trying his "Martial Law" bid.
7
-chicken-stripper-5 days ago
+6
I am grateful every day that I was able to leave Iowa.
6
PasswordABC123XYZ5 days ago
+2
But did your voting records leave Iowa with you?
2
-chicken-stripper-4 days ago
+3
Probably not, but I'd be more worried what they could do if I still lived there. They were already invalidating my voting registration every other year and I had to keep registering over and over.
3
willit10165 days ago
+7
enjoy your free-dumbs form the party of pedos....
7
SubwayHero4Ever5 days ago
+18
Can’t wait to join a class action lawsuit against this turd of a state.
18
sephjnr5 days ago
+2
Won't happen before the Second Civil War.
2
mvw25 days ago
+10
Congratulation Iowa, you did as we all expected of you.
10
SleepingToDreaming5 days ago
+6
"Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty." - Plato
6
KeepCalmCarryOnKY5 days ago
+6
Whi then shared with Palantir so they can disenfranchise then.
6
joeefx5 days ago
+4
Kim’s DA swore allegiance to Trump day one. Iowans are reaping what they’ve sown.
4
AlliedR25 days ago
+5
Remember when our state legislatures actually protected us?
5
Embarrassed_Age85545 days ago
+6
Brownshirts? At MY polling place? It's more likely than you think!
6
tnypissdkumquat5 days ago
+4
Well
That’s a no for me
4
Orikazu5 days ago
+4
Na na na na hey hey hey good bye America
4
shelter_king355 days ago
+26
Let’s just protest and take no action against a piece of shit who wants to destroy America for money.
26
o_MrBombastic_o5 days ago
+38
That piece of shit is your neighbor, coworker, family and friend who support the Republican party and they're doing it for free to own the Libs and we'll keep rolling our eyes and holding our tongues to remain civil with them instead of treating them like the unamerican monsters that don't belong in civil society
38
Anxious-Shapeshifter5 days ago
+11
Now might be good time to remind everyone that in the entire 8000 years of civilized human history its really only been the last few hundred years that have seen democracy.
The remaining 7800 years it's always been a class of peasant serfs living in total abject poverty slaving away for the aristocracy.
11
hawksdiesel5 days ago
+3
another "small gov't" lie
3
Apprehensive-Ad95235 days ago
+17
Of course because it's Iowa...I lived in Omaha for a few years...Iowa cares nothing....
17
Haramshorty935 days ago
+17
Isn't that Nebraska?
17
Dr-Robert-Kelso5 days ago
+8
There's nothing people from Omaha hate more than people from Council Bluffs.
8
ImStillExcited5 days ago
+1
My ex used to drag me out to Council Bluffs when she'd go visit them every once in a while. The only thing there that was actually worth it was Pizza King (and pissing off her conservative dad).
1
WarWorld5 days ago
+8
It's like 5 minutes from Iowa
8
tebowtastic5 days ago
+3
Nebraska complied months ago, or at least announced their intention to comply
3
aGrlHasNoUsername5 days ago
+4
Is there an Omaha, Iowa? That’s such a mouthful.
4
LazySwayze5 days ago
+2
That's a good vocal warm up exercise.
O-MA-HA-I-O-WA-O-MA-HA-I-O-WA-O-MA-HA-I-O-WA. Ok, time to go break a leg...
2
HatlessDuck5 days ago
+8
They don't care too much about Iowa. They already have them.
It's those purple states.
8
Starbreaker995 days ago
+5
Guess who those camps are for.
5
SplendidPunkinButter5 days ago
+5
No, it’s okay, guys! They pinky swore that they weren’t going to do anything evil with it!
5
MovieGuyMike5 days ago
+2
They’re going to feed that data into their propaganda machine. And Russia’s.
2
Adept-Mulberry-87205 days ago
+5
If all this data is sensitive then why do state respond to DOJ and share it? State officials that share data with DOJ should be indicted!
5
FaterFaker5 days ago
+3
So Iowa has to follow the rules but the dude at 1600 doesn't?
Noted.
3
bakeacake455 days ago
+3
Voter suppression is the game and Iowa is its name
Maybe next time ask the voters of Iowa if they want THEIR personal data shared
3
Ar_Ciel5 days ago
+3
Yeah it would be Iowa first, wouldn't it.
3
VelchroHeart5 days ago
+1
Omg that sounds a little scary tbh ( ꩜ ᯅ ꩜;)
1
blankvoidoid3 days ago
+1
In order to kiss an ass you need to bend a knee first
1
JeanLucRitard2 days ago
+1
As an Iowa State alumni, I can’t get over seeing spelling and punctuation errors in the article. Go Cyclones still!
146 Comments