· 146 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 5, 2026 at 11:15 PM

Iowa shares sensitive voter data with the Department of Justice

Posted by that_70_show_fan


Iowa shares sensitive voter data with the Department of Justice
Iowa Public Radio
Iowa shares sensitive voter data with the Department of Justice
Iowa shared voter registration data — including sensitive personal information — with the U.S. Department of Justice, Secretary of State Paul Pate announced Tuesday. The DOJ's demand for state voter lists has raised concerns about data privacy.

🚩 Report this post

146 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
NewsCards May 5, 2026 +2127
> At least 13 other states have agreed to provide their full voter registration data to the DOJ, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. The DOJ has sued 30 states for refusing to provide the data. This the "small government" that Republicans wanted?
2127
o_MrBombastic_o May 5, 2026 +625
Yes they only ever wanted rules to protect them from accountability while punishing others they disagree with
625
Dahhhkness May 5, 2026 +300
"Small government" has always meant "more power in fewer hands with no system of checks, balances, or accountability."
300
HarveysBackupAccount May 6, 2026 +26
that and "taxation is theft"
26
New-Ad-363 May 6, 2026 +13
That feels accurate lately
13
HarveysBackupAccount May 6, 2026 +3
Too true 15-20 years ago I heard about a group of people (a miniature intentional community - maybe a half dozen or dozen families) who were pacifist, so to avoid paying for war via taxes they kept their overall income (plus tax deductions) low enough that they essentially paid no income tax. As a group they pooled resources to live as cheaply as possible. I don't know if I could do that but I admire their commitment to their principles
3
aeschenkarnos May 6, 2026 +2
Self-dealing isn't theft though!
2
_TheBeerBaron_ May 6, 2026 +1
Exactly. Small /= less powerful Small = fewer people wielding that same power
1
secretlyloaded May 6, 2026 +68
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." -Frank Wilhoit
68
darwinooc May 6, 2026 +26
You misunderstand they want a small government made up of the and only the 1% and f*** the other 99%
26
whatproblems May 6, 2026 +66
funny those states were probably all the “states rights” group not too long ago
66
EbonBehelit May 6, 2026 +19
This comic always comes to mind: [https://ahoyuniverse.com/post/773630795458953216/my-cartoon-for-issue-1640-of-private-eye-magazine](https://ahoyuniverse.com/post/773630795458953216/my-cartoon-for-issue-1640-of-private-eye-magazine)
19
Googleitgenius May 6, 2026 +24
Its all about casting a huge drag net to find voters who mailed in their vote then passed away or moved etc , then the screaming "Dead people are voting, fictious addresses etc" then you will hear "we have no choice we have to federalize elections blah blah"
24
AlliedR2 May 6, 2026 +2
They mean "Small enough for the Federal government to push around".
2
fermat9990 May 5, 2026 +2492
Democracy was a fun experiment
2492
CSKweh May 6, 2026 +47
Still ongoing! Do not despair. Liberty is worth fighting for. To quote Randy Marsh, I didn’t hear no bell! 🔔
47
fermat9990 May 6, 2026 +8
Thank you very much! This helps me a lot! Have a great day!
8
Violet_Paradox May 8, 2026 +3
The stakes are extremely high though. The only reason the world survived Nazi Germany is because the Allies invaded and killed/captured the key figures of the regime. If the US falls into a dictatorship, and the new Allies try the same thing, it'll erupt into a nuclear war that kills us all. If no one does anything, the US will spread its cancer to the rest of the world by force and we plunge into a new era of global tyranny. It's a fight worth having but this is the absolute final chance.
3
Disgruntled-Cacti May 5, 2026 +373
Been dying for decades now. Might as well put the nail in the coffin.
373
fermat9990 May 5, 2026 +99
This really crushes me!
99
Phyrexian_Archlegion May 5, 2026 +166
The extinction of American democracy will lead to untold suffering across the planet for generations to come. People in the future will look back on us and damn us for letting this experiment in self-governance fail.
166
thtamthrfckr May 5, 2026 +162
And see who they did it for, a failed businessman racist rapist nepo baby with the iq of a turnip
162
Monnster07 May 5, 2026 +41
That's an unfair comparison...turnips are actually useful.
41
thtamthrfckr May 6, 2026 +22
And have more nutrients than that evil narcissist has ever ingested or provided, you’re right
22
Cilph May 6, 2026 +2
...and the people who voted for him, who are trying to deny any kind of responsibility.
2
Slypenslyde May 6, 2026 +63
Honestly this kind of attitude feels like the kind of exceptionalism that's a part of why Americans are just standing around and shrugging while their freedoms are stolen one piece at a time. Most other countries aren't Hellholes that only get luxury by the grace of the US. By many standards, there are a lot of developed nations that have a better quality of life and *have* had a better quality of life for a long time. They aren't lining up to save the US. A lot of them are ready to stake their claim as the new world leader in whatever fields they excel in. All the people standing around with their thumbs in their pockets saying, "It can't collapse, people will save us!" are going to be really disappointed. The only way to keep certain things is to fight for them, and the US is a nation where nobody is interested in fighting for anyone but themselves.
63
technobrendo May 6, 2026 +39
American exceptionalism and *greatest country on earth* was the best marketing gimmick in the history of the universe
39
Junior_Builder_4340 May 6, 2026 +3
Just like this. https://www.artic.edu/artworks/121186/world-s-highest-standard-of-living
3
East-Ice-3199 May 6, 2026 +5
Yep. There won’t be any revolutions. There won’t be a civil war.
5
darkk41 May 6, 2026 +10
Europe thinking they will become the world leader and not that fascism will control the globe are seriously delusional. It's not just the US on their last legs, it's western hegemony. Everyone in the world is too busy being a selfish POS to take on a world affecting problem in fascism. Hell, half of Europe sees what's happening in the US and started spending MORE money on China and Russian exports. It's laughable that they are going to become the world leader. The time is LONG past for leaders that will tell these powers to kick rocks and focus on building lasting stability instead of putting extra money in their own pockets. We need that everywhere. Poland is already teeing up the next Putin stooge to replace Orban, but people want you to believe that this is just a US problem and there's no reason to care in Europe. You're not gonna like where this leads, nor is anyone else that doesn't enjoy living under a boot.
10
badnuub May 6, 2026 +8
But how else could they act smug on the internet while their countries are embracing etho nationalism?
8
Cyrano_Knows May 6, 2026 +12
I did it for decades with 1930's Germans. Never once paused to consider the idea that they might have hated Hitler.
12
Low_Pickle_112 May 6, 2026 +33
Doubtful. They'll probably look back at us and damn us for all the coups, wars, and other horrible things we did for over a century to countless millions in the name of rich scumbags all while saying "We are freedom and democracy."
33
waffle_iron_maiden May 6, 2026 +8
The world will move on without us, other countries still have functioning democracies they do not need ours to stay for theirs to work. Our country is not a shining beacon or example, we haven't done too many things better than countries aside from military power. The country has been behind the curve of other developed countries with things like civil rights and citizen welfare. When other developed countries have had free healthcare established for a while now, the US has been playing one step forward two steps back for decades. It leads you to wonder what have we really done that makes us a country others should look up to? Free speech was nice, it wasn't isolated to the US though. The US has certainly driven advancements in science, particularly during the space race, but those days are over. I believe there was a time when the US meant something to some countries, but to anyone following its history the US has been driven by war for profiteering and control for a very long time. That has always been visible
8
kingtacticool May 6, 2026 +3
Yeah, its going to make the wasteland pretty uncomfortable when it comes to story time around the fire.
3
Embarrassed_Age8554 May 6, 2026 +2
Take good care of your portable phonograph and make sure you have enough needles. Thorns don't cut it.
2
fermat9990 May 5, 2026 +9
And marvel at how easily it failed
9
m1ster_frundles May 6, 2026 +2
lmao holy f*** the exceptionalism in this comment. There's a whole civilized world outside of the US, you should try experiencing it.
2
RobotPhoto May 6, 2026 +2
don't let it. This super passive depressive shit is probably from Russian or Israili Bots.
2
Tapprunner May 5, 2026 +19
It's definitely dead. Democracy is like a parachute - if it doesn't work pretty much how it's supposed to everytime, you don't really have one. Not every election needs to be rigged for it to still not count as a functional democracy, just as your parachute only needs to fail once to kill you.
19
LittleKitty235 May 10, 2026 +2
I call my reserve chute Canada
2
stitchface66 May 6, 2026 +1
i mean, some never got it.
1
Various-Salt488 May 7, 2026 +1
If it’s important to you, you’ll fight for it.
1
Kitagawasans May 5, 2026 +39
How is technocracy or oligarchy the same as democracy? It’s been over since Regan. Since politicians have been paid for and by corps. This isn’t democracy anymore. It’s not comparable. But it can be brought back. Pretty sure people out number the rich ghouls 99.99 to 1.
39
ScienceWilly May 5, 2026 +25
If only the 99.99% would get up off their asses and do something. I wonder how bad things have to get before the breaking point, and what plans the ghouls have in place as we approach it.
25
SplendidPunkinButter May 6, 2026 +7
Of course it can be brought back. It didn’t exist at all in 1775. The problem is usually bringing it back requires something like a big war or other catastrophe where lots of people die.
7
CainPillar May 6, 2026 +1
Their bots outnumber you even more.
1
[deleted] May 6, 2026 +6
[deleted]
6
Less_Tacos May 6, 2026 +13
Really happy I don't have children.
13
raptorlightning May 7, 2026 +2
Democracy can only survive if you're willing to water the tree of liberty.
2
fermat9990 May 7, 2026 +1
How do you do that?
1
GetsBetterAfterAFew May 5, 2026 +925
My state Wyoming was the 1st to openly share voter data, our Secretary of State Chuck Gray a nepo baby loser whose dad funded his campaign, is a Trump loyalist. Chuck Gray and his bold 4'11" balding frame had a radio show on his daddys radio station rose to fame over discussing voting illegalities and drop boxes, in a state that is 90% Republicans with one drop box in the SOS office bolted to the wall.
925
PigFarmer1 May 5, 2026 +223
"I'm Chuck Gray and my daddy *didn't* pay for this message."
223
malhans May 6, 2026 +128
Wyoming is such an ironic state to complain about voter illegalities. 90% of the people you talk to will be voting republican and have no mind to hear a different opinion. And yet, it’s like some people aren’t radically republican enough. It’s insane. (I am from Wyoming but no longer live there so I’m not talking entirely out of my ass)
128
Windfade May 6, 2026 +101
I can't believe 20% of Wyoming's population showed up to this thread.
101
malhans May 6, 2026 +17
Imagine my surprise opening this thread and seeing someone mention Wyoming first! (what’s even crazier is how many people from the state I know that ended up in the area I moved to)
17
inwondermentofwinter May 6, 2026 +1
I mean it's 2 people it's not that crazy
1
Anlysia May 6, 2026 +25
Wyoming is an ironic state to complain about federal voting at all because they have 2 senators and 1 congressman too many.
25
JustHereForCookies17 May 6, 2026 +14
That's probably a hilarious joke if you live somewhere with representation, but it sounds really shitty to someone who lives in DC and doesn't have any voting representation on Capitol Hill, but somehow needs Congress to approve our annual city budget. 
14
malhans May 6, 2026 +2
2 senators is mandated by the great compromise of 1787 and 1 representative in the house is the minimum as mandated by the constitution. Makes sense where you’re coming from in theory, but why exactly does Wyoming deserve no representation? Because of how the system was constructed over 200 years ago? You can critique the system without saying that Wyoming deserves to have no representation in the government. I’m happy to criticize Wyoming all day everyday but for as many people who talk about the voting power of Wyoming compared to somewhere else, no one really brings up how no one gives a shit about winning Wyomings votes. They’re basically worthless already. I hear you on the irritation but it is actually bonkers to say that there’s too many congressman when that is literally the minimum that is written into the constitution.
2
JustHereForCookies17 May 6, 2026 +5
As someone who lives in a non-state (DC) with NO Congressional voting power, thank you for this comment. 
5
malhans May 6, 2026 +2
Absolutely! I hate this idea that a place being low population or small (dc) means no representation is deserved. It’s actually insane to me that DC has no congressional voting power.
2
Turambar87 May 6, 2026 +5
A lot of those big empty states should be consolidated.
5
InquisitiveGamer May 6, 2026 +3
I'm sure they were sharing data back in the day before electronic information as well behind closed doors.
3
AdAnxious8842 May 5, 2026 +432
Yet, at least 30 other states are resisting the DoJ request. Iowa could have been one of them. This sounds more like a GOP "I can have my cake and eat it too" scenario. Complain about the process but go along to help the administration's voter suppression plans.
432
iamthenite May 6, 2026 +59
I live in Iowa and honestly I’m surprised they waited this long to do this. All branches of government are red here and our governor has been shamelessly trying to suck up to Trump since his first term. Sucks here.
59
ImOutWanderingAround May 6, 2026 +12
They were probably negotiating the quid pro quo.
12
Jeedeye May 6, 2026 +9
She keeps trying but she's often too drunk to take the hints she isn't wanted.
9
Dahhhkness May 5, 2026 +206
This is why there are no "good Republicans". Some may tut-tut about *process* and the like, but in the end, there is nothing but a desire for permanent power. This DOJ has *nothing* but malevolent intentions for the future of voting, and handing over data to them can only serve the GOP's designs.
206
Cyrano_Knows May 6, 2026 +52
Department of Justice run by Trump's ex-personal defense lawyer who stopped cold any release and any prosecution of the Epstein Files.
52
Ready-Ad6113 May 5, 2026 +264
Citizens own representatives have betrayed them. They will be targeting people who vote against the regime. There’s a reason why they’re building so many camps and it’s not for immigrants.
264
o_MrBombastic_o May 5, 2026 +73
They never pretended to be your representative or to have good intentions towards their opposition and when the time comes your Republican neighbors, coworkers, friends and family won't stand with you they will turn you in start treating them appropriately 
73
Brother_J_La_la May 6, 2026 +24
They can skip the camp and send me straight to the showers. I've done more in service of this country than any of these pigfuckers. We're all gonna have to nut-up before this year is over.
24
MrInexorable May 6, 2026 +68
> "We are legally obligated to comply with the request, but we do not take the obligation to turn this information over lightly," Pate said in a statement. The [1993 NVRA](https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/2/text) he's citing was written to limit what the federal government can pressure states into, not enable it. Thirty other Secretaries of State read the same statute and landed on the opposite conclusion about what's legally required. "Legally obligated", PFFFFFFT
68
Altruistic_Koala_122 May 6, 2026 +26
**Republicans want a Totalitarian Regime. Small government to them is just their party ruling over everyone.**
26
Lonely_Noyaaa May 6, 2026 +51
> We are legally obligated to comply with the request, but we do not take the obligation to turn this information over lightly. Secretary of State said this while handing over sensitive data including Social Security numbers for roughly 2 million voters. If he has serious concerns, why cave so quickly instead of fighting like other states are doing?
51
Hellstorm901 May 6, 2026 +21
I really don’t know why Trumps opponents keep saying just wait until the elections and we’ll vote him out Everything he’s doing from collecting voter data to flooding his political opponents states with external federal police and troops loyal to him and only him speaks volumes of a man who is not going to entertain the idea of there being another election When the time for election draws near watch how quickly another imaginary terror group like “Cartel De Los Soles” appears and that this never before heard of group will entirely be composed of all the people on the voter lists who happen to vote for anyone not him (Cartel De Los Soles doesn’t actually exist in Venezuela, it was just a nickname used by Venezuelans to refer to a group of corrupt military officers with the Soles, translation “Sun,” referring to the emblem on their military uniforms, Trump made it into a scary “Narco Terrorist” group in order to have an “Enemy” for his invocation of war powers)
21
AhBee1 May 6, 2026 +19
Greg Abbott gleefully handed Texas voter info over. He's so excited to support the Epstein administration and do his part to disenfranchise millions of us. He finds out what the people want and need and then does the opposite. His sole purpose, like all red state cult members, is to serve Donald Trump.
19
rhetheo100 May 5, 2026 +52
They can’t win on merit.. so they connive and steal. A treasonous act
52
Solid_College_9145 May 9, 2026 +1
**What do Trump and the Republicans intend to do with the sensitive voter data from states that they are aquiring?** Short answer: they plan to use those state voter files and linked data to target, mobilize, and challenge votes — i.e., voter microtargeting, turnout operations, fundraising/communications, voter‑roll management, and legal/ballot‑challenge work. Key uses (concise): * Microtargeting and persuasion: combine state voter files with commercial data to build detailed voter profiles for tailored ads, mail, calls, and GOTV messaging. * Turnout and get‑out‑the‑vote (GOTV): prioritize contacts and resources toward persuadable or likely supporters to boost turnout. * Fundraising and donor targeting: match voting records with consumer/donor data to identify likely contributors and optimize asks. * Voter‑roll maintenance and challenges: identify inactive, duplicate, or out‑of‑precinct registrations to prepare legal challenges or purges where permitted. * Message testing and analytics: run experiments to find most effective messaging and delivery channels. * Coordination with allied groups: share or license data among campaigns, party committees, and allied PACs/NGOs to coordinate efforts. * Legal/defense prep: use data to investigate alleged fraud, prepare litigation, or support recounts/challenges. Limitations and risks: * Legal and state rules vary: some states restrict commercial use or resale; access can require credentials and agreement to state terms. * Privacy and public‑opinion concerns: combining public voter files with consumer databases raises privacy and ethical issues and invites scrutiny. * Accuracy limits: commercial data and modeling can be imperfect; misuse can backfire politically or legally.
1
Klepdar May 6, 2026 +16
Blanche and Bondi both belong in f****** prison.
16
jquas21 May 5, 2026 +56
Trying to steal, gerrymander, and rig the elections against the people’s will. It’s funny how republicans and Trump are so pro regulation and big government when it comes to the people’s right to vote. No way a motor voter laws could pass with these republicans in congress and those judges throughout the federal judiciary.
56
ObviouslyRealPerson May 5, 2026 +59
Yeah! Lick those boots Iowa!
59
Embarrassed_Age8554 May 6, 2026 +24
Our governor Reynolds loves the taste of Trump's shoes in the morning.
24
Cynykl May 6, 2026 +1
> shoes You misspelled ballsack.
1
Embarrassed_Age8554 May 6, 2026 +2
Why not both?
2
King_James_77 May 6, 2026 +11
If this ends, can we sue the heritage foundation?
11
Vegetable-Error-2068 May 6, 2026 +1
Sue? I hope that's not the only tool in your toolbox.
1
King_James_77 May 6, 2026 +3
Before you talk about my toolbox, I hope you can voice yours. Cuz last I did I got suspended.
3
MrMichaelJames May 6, 2026 +27
Time for voters in these states to start suing the state and the Feds.
27
GoodGuyCap May 6, 2026 +11
As an Iowan, I am so happy my state did this. I am sure there is no negatives to such actions! /s. I f****** hate it here.
11
Embarrassed_Age8554 May 6, 2026 +1
Well, we can't say they're hiding their true colors.
1
JesusWuta40oz May 6, 2026 +12
Its so they can decide which states and which voting poll places to send ICE and intimidate voter turn out.
12
l_rufus_californicus May 6, 2026 +10
>"...[D]ata will be protected appropriately under federal law, and we expect them to uphold that promise." *laughs in depressed Iowa* Uh huh. I'm sure it will.
10
The-1st-One May 6, 2026 +9
>At least 13 other states have agreed to provide their full voter registration data to the DOJ, according to the [Brennan Center for Justice](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/tracker-justice-department-requests-voter-information). The DOJ has sued 30 states for refusing to provide the data. Iowans should counter sue to not have their private data strewn about by this farce.
9
Alwayssunnyinarizona May 5, 2026 +44
Imagine if Biden had done this.
44
drproc90 May 5, 2026 +104
If the paedophile protection party ever loses power then Dems need to turn this on its head. Every registered republican for the 2024 cycle added to the sex offenders register.
104
wasteymclife May 6, 2026 +9
Take it all the way, gerrymander conservative votes into oblivion. The right keeps setting new ROE like they don't expect a fight ever. Though let's be honest they've been right so far. (Elected officials I mean, people have been showing out all over the country).
9
Ok_Anywhere_7828 May 5, 2026 +24
And every sex offender now a registered republican
24
sonic_couth May 5, 2026 +27
It seems that it can be fairly assumed that every Republican is ok with pedophilia now.
27
LazySwayze May 5, 2026 +7
Aren't they already?
7
ThrownAway17Years May 6, 2026 +9
I could be wrong, but I thought this process change is possible but only with legislation from Congress? So another case of the executive overreaching and bypassing the people.
9
-waveydavey- May 6, 2026 +9
Those that released it should go to prison
9
LSX3399 May 6, 2026 +7
People are still way too casually ushering in fascism.
7
InvisiblePinkUnic0rn May 6, 2026 +7
Weird how so many people and governments went so fast and all in on federal boot licking
7
CheetahSerious7169 May 6, 2026 +5
...what the f*** do we even do?
5
Quest-guy May 6, 2026 +7
Some “small government” Am I right?
7
MaximumJim_ May 6, 2026 +8
Big government Republicans are aiding their fellow big government Republicans.
8
Turkino May 6, 2026 +7
Most overt and coordinated power grab I've ever seen short of a military coup or that South Korean president trying his "Martial Law" bid.
7
-chicken-stripper- May 6, 2026 +6
I am grateful every day that I was able to leave Iowa.
6
PasswordABC123XYZ May 6, 2026 +2
But did your voting records leave Iowa with you?
2
-chicken-stripper- May 6, 2026 +3
Probably not, but I'd be more worried what they could do if I still lived there. They were already invalidating my voting registration every other year and I had to keep registering over and over.
3
willit1016 May 6, 2026 +7
enjoy your free-dumbs form the party of pedos....
7
SubwayHero4Ever May 5, 2026 +18
Can’t wait to join a class action lawsuit against this turd of a state.
18
sephjnr May 6, 2026 +2
Won't happen before the Second Civil War.
2
mvw2 May 6, 2026 +10
Congratulation Iowa, you did as we all expected of you.
10
SleepingToDreaming May 6, 2026 +6
"Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty." - Plato
6
KeepCalmCarryOnKY May 6, 2026 +6
Whi then shared with Palantir so they can disenfranchise then.
6
joeefx May 6, 2026 +4
Kim’s DA swore allegiance to Trump day one. Iowans are reaping what they’ve sown.
4
AlliedR2 May 6, 2026 +5
Remember when our state legislatures actually protected us?
5
Embarrassed_Age8554 May 6, 2026 +6
Brownshirts? At MY polling place? It's more likely than you think!
6
tnypissdkumquat May 6, 2026 +4
Well That’s a no for me
4
Orikazu May 6, 2026 +4
Na na na na hey hey hey good bye America
4
shelter_king35 May 5, 2026 +26
Let’s just protest and take no action against a piece of shit who wants to destroy America for money.
26
o_MrBombastic_o May 5, 2026 +38
That piece of shit is your neighbor, coworker, family and friend who support the Republican party and they're doing it for free to own the Libs and we'll keep rolling our eyes and holding our tongues to remain civil with them instead of treating them like the unamerican monsters that don't belong in civil society 
38
Anxious-Shapeshifter May 6, 2026 +11
Now might be good time to remind everyone that in the entire 8000 years of civilized human history its really only been the last few hundred years that have seen democracy. The remaining 7800 years it's always been a class of peasant serfs living in total abject poverty slaving away for the aristocracy.
11
hawksdiesel May 6, 2026 +3
another "small gov't" lie
3
Apprehensive-Ad9523 May 5, 2026 +17
Of course because it's Iowa...I lived in Omaha for a few years...Iowa cares nothing....
17
Haramshorty93 May 5, 2026 +17
Isn't that Nebraska?
17
Dr-Robert-Kelso May 6, 2026 +8
There's nothing people from Omaha hate more than people from Council Bluffs.
8
ImStillExcited May 6, 2026 +1
My ex used to drag me out to Council Bluffs when she'd go visit them every once in a while. The only thing there that was actually worth it was Pizza King (and pissing off her conservative dad).
1
WarWorld May 5, 2026 +8
It's like 5 minutes from Iowa
8
tebowtastic May 6, 2026 +3
Nebraska complied months ago, or at least announced their intention to comply
3
aGrlHasNoUsername May 5, 2026 +4
Is there an Omaha, Iowa? That’s such a mouthful.
4
LazySwayze May 5, 2026 +2
That's a good vocal warm up exercise. O-MA-HA-I-O-WA-O-MA-HA-I-O-WA-O-MA-HA-I-O-WA. Ok, time to go break a leg...
2
HatlessDuck May 6, 2026 +8
They don't care too much about Iowa. They already have them. It's those purple states.
8
Starbreaker99 May 6, 2026 +5
Guess who those camps are for.
5
SplendidPunkinButter May 6, 2026 +5
No, it’s okay, guys! They pinky swore that they weren’t going to do anything evil with it!
5
MovieGuyMike May 6, 2026 +2
They’re going to feed that data into their propaganda machine. And Russia’s.
2
Adept-Mulberry-8720 May 6, 2026 +5
If all this data is sensitive then why do state respond to DOJ and share it? State officials that share data with DOJ should be indicted!
5
FaterFaker May 5, 2026 +3
So Iowa has to follow the rules but the dude at 1600 doesn't? Noted.
3
bakeacake45 May 6, 2026 +3
Voter suppression is the game and Iowa is its name Maybe next time ask the voters of Iowa if they want THEIR personal data shared
3
Ar_Ciel May 6, 2026 +3
Yeah it would be Iowa first, wouldn't it.
3
VelchroHeart May 6, 2026 +1
Omg that sounds a little scary tbh ( ꩜ ᯅ ꩜;) 
1
blankvoidoid May 7, 2026 +1
In order to kiss an ass you need to bend a knee first
1
JeanLucRitard May 9, 2026 +1
As an Iowa State alumni, I can’t get over seeing spelling and punctuation errors in the article. Go Cyclones still!
1
← Back to Board