· 199 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 6, 2026 at 2:44 PM

Iran alleges US rescue ops likely cover to 'steal enriched uranium'

Posted by llixaa


Iran alleges US rescue ops likely cover to 'steal enriched uranium'
Daily Sabah
Iran alleges US rescue ops likely cover to 'steal enriched uranium'
A recent U.S. mission to rescue a downed airman may have been a cover operation to steal Iran's enriched uranium, the country's Foreign Ministry...

🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
RollinThundaga Apr 6, 2026 +1891
...why would they expect anyone to believe that we would need a cover at this point? If that was the goal it'd just happen.
1891
ineyeseekay Apr 6, 2026 +622
It would be a late night tweet in all caps that we stole their shit. 
622
OtheDreamer Apr 6, 2026 +209
That’s how you know we didn’t really snatch their uranium….this time
209
ineyeseekay Apr 6, 2026 +57
I wouldn't be surprised if an official white House announcement included "nana nana booboo"
57
DramaticWesley Apr 6, 2026 +14
It would be profanity-laden, like many of his recent late night tweets.
14
leanpunzz Apr 6, 2026 +24
I STOLE THAT SHIT, STRAIGHT STOLE THAT SHIT
24
KP_Wrath Apr 6, 2026 +11
*that our brave men and women are actively taking it. Do you really think he’d wait until our people were out of dodge before running his mouth about it?
11
NotSoAwfulName Apr 6, 2026 +5
This is a Rust public server, we just didn't realise it.
5
InterstellarReddit Apr 6, 2026 +13
It would be on the signal chat too
13
Adventurous_Light_85 Apr 6, 2026 +84
Right. Its like “ hey we’re going to bomb and destroy your country, but we’re going to very sneakily take your uranium”
84
Amoral_Abe Apr 6, 2026 +32
It's worse than that. It's like, "hey, were going to bomb and destroy you and also seize all your uranium and make sure you can never get any more". "Ok.... Shhh guys, we don't want them to know we are siezing their uranium... That we told them were siezing"
32
redwing66 Apr 7, 2026 +2
And wherever that uranium is now, it's either buried, or under very heavy guard. Would a couple of C130s and some helicopters really be enough to pull that off? You'd have to bring enough special operators for a heavy and extended firefight, and there would almost certainly be casualties.
2
HerezahTip Apr 6, 2026 +2
Well, we went into Venezuela to “stop the drugs” and we brought back a shitload of their gold and sold their oil while trump took deposits in offshore accounts. Sooo I wouldn’t put it past them to do that.
2
wta3445 Apr 6, 2026 +6
The gold and oil were both announced by the Trump administration. The point is they don't care or need to hide when they do shit. It's all out in the open.
6
Straight-faced_solo Apr 7, 2026 +3
Oh its definitely not **ALL** out in the open. This admin does tons of fucked up crazy shit, that we only learn about later. Did you know we invaded north korea during his first term and killed a boat full of fisherman. It happened back in 2019. Congress didn't learn about it until 2021, and it wasn't made public knowledge until 2025.
3
HerezahTip Apr 6, 2026 +2
Oh hunny, it’s not *all* out in the open. We will be learning about this administration’s crimes for decades.
2
AvatarOfMomus Apr 6, 2026 +33
It might make some sense to put up a front as Iran would respond much more strongly to an operation that might be going after their Uranium stockpiles compared to a rescue operation... That's the answer to your question, but this is still nonsense, since as far as we know most if not all of Iran's enriched Uranium stockpile is trapped behind hundreds of tons of rubble in tunnels under that mountain the US bunker-buster'ed last year. It's pretty hard to do a "smash and grab" operation that involves several weeks (at least) of construction work...
33
crazedizzled Apr 6, 2026 +9
Iran is already playing the only card they have.
9
Hanako_lkezawa Apr 6, 2026 +44
My creative brain is trying to spin a conspiracy out of this question so bare with me: They're possibly setting the groundwork to claim "false flag" for a potential future nuclear detonation or other radiological incident. "OH, you stole that enriched uranium a while ago, and coincidentally you get hit by a terrorist dirty bomb / nuke that is being tied back to and blamed on us? You must have used the stolen uranium in a false flag to drum up war support 😤"
44
Mistrblank Apr 6, 2026 +21
So we're in the "I know you know that I know that you know, but you don't know that I know that you know I know you know" phase of fuckery?
21
CMDR_ACE209 Apr 6, 2026 +19
I wish I knew. 🤷‍♂️
19
Mistrblank Apr 6, 2026 +6
Great, now I know that you wish you knew, but did you know that?
6
CMDR_ACE209 Apr 6, 2026 +3
I didn't; but since you just told me, now I do. Which means that I probably... Wait.. what was the topic again?
3
TomKirkman1 Apr 6, 2026 +7
I was thinking of it more as a mindgame to try and throw off what the actual location is. If they privately maintain this line and stay appearing sincere about it, it indicates that they're storing it there (even if they actually aren't). If they make it look like they're bluffing, then they hope the US thinks it's stored elsewhere (even though it's actually there).
7
Manos_Of_Fate Apr 6, 2026 +93
Also, our SecDef is a raging alcoholic who accidentally committed capital espionage offenses effectively *in front of a reporter* because he was trying to skirt records laws. Operational security isn’t exactly his strong suit.
93
haveanairforceday Apr 6, 2026 +16
Say more?
16
Manos_Of_Fate Apr 6, 2026 +56
They accidentally invited a reporter to a Signal chat where they were discussing operational security. This was last spring.
56
MercantileReptile Apr 6, 2026 +30
The middle of March 2025 feels like approximately eighty dipshit scandals out of Washington ago. Barely a day goes by without some bullshit, I don't blame anyone for not remembering "Signalgate".
30
mockg Apr 6, 2026 +10
I miss the days when the administration in charge wasn't front page news everyday. I remember during Biden and Obama things were mainly in the background.
10
EatLard Apr 6, 2026 +6
I remember not thinking “what did that dumb f*** do this time?” every time the president or sec def was in the news.
6
Inveign Apr 6, 2026 +2
That was last year...? Felt like a decade ago. Man, there sure is many years fitting into 12 months...
2
haveanairforceday Apr 6, 2026 +5
Ohh i thought a new thing happened
5
Magjee Apr 6, 2026 +2
*Sir, a third signal chat has leaked*
2
ClearlyCylindrical Apr 6, 2026 +4
And trump would be posting it online immediately after
4
Prestigious-Smoke511 Apr 6, 2026 +7
I don’t think the cover was intended to fool us. It was probably indented to fool Iran.  That’s my guess anyway. 
7
Jest_out_for_a_Rip Apr 6, 2026 +2
Presumably it would be cover to prevent Iran from knowing. Because they would contest trying to take the uranium far harder than a downed airman.
2
Xasther Apr 6, 2026 +2
This has to be the most absurd, yet most convincing, counter-argument that could have been brought up here.
2
Vicorin Apr 6, 2026 +456
If they had been securing uranium, they would be bragging about it right now.
456
CoyotesOnTheWing Apr 6, 2026 +145
Unless the mission failed
145
RontoWraps Apr 6, 2026 +144
But then Iran would be boasting about why it failed. It just didn’t happen.
144
HumansNeedNotApply1 Apr 6, 2026 +34
Err... this is exactly what Iran is saying and boasting?
34
Whoop-Sees Apr 7, 2026 +24
Uhhh no? “The possibility that this was a deception operation to steal enriched uranium should not be ignored at all." This is not Iran saying “they attempted to steal our uranium and we foiled the attempt”
24
YouMeAndReneDupree Apr 7, 2026 +2
You can't just put Uranium in your pockets and leave lol. It's so heavy 
2
106 Apr 6, 2026 +742
Rescuing both pilots and making off with some bonus uranium? That’s just showing off…
742
Torched420 Apr 6, 2026 +122
Think they replaced it with pinball machine parts? 
122
GoingLurking Apr 6, 2026 +40
That’s what got doc killed.
40
Glaurung8404 Apr 6, 2026 +7
It’s ok he wore a bullet proof vest
7
MosesOnAcid Apr 6, 2026 +39
While rescuing the pilots a side quest popped up
39
ThePickleConnoisseur Apr 6, 2026 +22
[Optional] Yoink Uranium
22
PapstJL4U Apr 6, 2026 +7
Runner, profit opportunity nearby!
7
valeyard89 Apr 6, 2026 +13
I'm sure that in 2026, plutonium is available in every corner drugstore, but in 1955 it's a little hard to come by.
13
fireky2 Apr 6, 2026 +24
They wouldnt be able to do that. The enriched uranium is buried in rubble. Its going to take at best a few weeks to get it out. Now could they be using it as a cover for recon or to test out air defense/ground defense for an eventual attempt to do an operation, very likely
24
RobertLeeSwagger Apr 6, 2026 +514
Is it just me or does Iran seem to track various theories online and then provide support for those theories. It’s a smart disinformation strategy if so and there’s been at least a few times where it turned out to be fact.
514
Mr_Terry-Folds Apr 6, 2026 +236
Either this, or they even the ones to spread it from the first place.
236
86rpt Apr 6, 2026 +100
I believe they seed many of them, and water the ones that grow.
100
smegdawg Apr 6, 2026 +18
Was my old dating strategy!
18
86rpt Apr 6, 2026 +5
Hopefully you're not swinging between two trees in a hammock big playa 🤣
5
smegdawg Apr 6, 2026 +12
Oh I was a really shitty gardener. Mostly just weeds that developed thorns until my friend hooked me up with my now wife 16 years ago.
12
86rpt Apr 6, 2026 +6
Always best to take a cutting 🤣
6
AngleParticular2914 Apr 6, 2026 +12
100% believe this to be the case, there’s a lot of accounts in this site that are spewing hot garbage about this war 24/7
12
Most-Round-4132 Apr 6, 2026 +23
They saw how effective it was for the Russians I suppose
23
Slggyqo Apr 6, 2026 +140
This a propaganda war. Iran is NOT going to win it by taking on America head on. They don’t even have a method of reaching the USA, meanwhile we’ve got low flying helicopters all over Iran looking for ONE guy. Convincing everyone that the war is pointless and American can’t be trusted (and especially shouldn’t be followed into battle) is the real angle.
140
cristianserran0 Apr 6, 2026 +23
People don’t need much convincing, though. So also low hanging fruit.
23
cletus_spuckle Apr 6, 2026 +1
Not to mention everyone has known this for decades and everyone still does massive amounts of business with the US. It’s still the world’s premier superpower
1
SaintsNoah14 Apr 6, 2026 +2
Always is.
2
84Cressida Apr 6, 2026 +34
They see the stupid shit listnook posts and then say shit to appeal to those morons.
34
hack404 Apr 6, 2026 +20
Probably writing some of the posts
20
yoogle1 Apr 6, 2026 +48
Agreed I saw this dumbass take on X before IRGC started parroting it
48
SLR107FR-31 Apr 6, 2026 +19
Russia's been doing it for 80 years
19
Paithegift Apr 6, 2026 +35
It isn't just you, the Islamic Republic terrorist network has been doing it forever. It's also not that smart, just having no qualms about changing your stories on a whim to gain the sympathy of the useful idiots in the West.
35
Muggsy423 Apr 6, 2026 +6
Their shitposting department is on overdrive
6
hypatianata Apr 6, 2026 +4
Maybe I’m crazy, but it seems like since Russia and Iran started collaborating, the IRI’s propaganda and behavior have incorporated more of the things Russia is more known for (such as a firehose approach, support all sides, etc). There was a rumor they were getting “security” help from Russia for controlling internal dissent.
4
imasammich Apr 6, 2026 +10
It seems to me Iran's entire online strategy is to cater to listnook and listnookors. Its really the only place pro iranian and iranian propaganda has legs. So they either are creating it from scratch or they realized listnookors will reposts/upvote and take as 100% fact anything Iran puts out there as long as it supports the average listnookors political opinions and their view of the US.
10
HowManyMeeses Apr 6, 2026 +18
This is the same strategy the GOP has been using for years. A lot of their major talking points, like Haitian's eating pets in the US, originate in conspiracy forums. They track what's gaining traction and run with it. Edit: During the election, you could see what they'd move to next based on listnook's conspiracy sublistnook. It was especially interesting watching the conservative sublistnook have a collection of talking points that would collapse into whichever one was gaining the most traction.
18
NativeMasshole Apr 6, 2026 +13
It's also how the Russian psyops work. They just take known issues and make divisionist statements about them online to stir up unrest. The only difference here is that Iran is doing it very publicly to counteract our shitposting president. He's literally making it easier for them.
13
EggNo289 Apr 6, 2026 +2
Welcome to social media, where bad actors and bots backed by Iran, Russia, Israel, China, DPRK, Hungary, and others create and spread Culture War, misinformation, and psy-ops campaigns RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR FACES and we click on it, engage with it, share it, etc.
2
OrdoXenos Apr 6, 2026 +72
The allegations are ridiculous. US soldiers aren’t wearing Iron Man suits. They are not the Hulk or Space Marines. They can’t dig out tons of rubble, transported 1,000 pounds of nuclear materials on their back for 22 miles, and load them to the aircraft without some sort of heavy equipment. And none of them are seen. The wreckage have the Little Birds, but not a single heavy equipment are seen.
72
teokun123 Apr 7, 2026 +3
this shit is funny lmao. Troll wars.
3
mkbt Apr 6, 2026 +13
[CNN geolocated the initial CSAR operations near the the Karoon River.](https://www.twz.com/air/photos-of-f-15e-wreckage-emerge-amid-iranian-claims-it-shot-down-an-american-fighter) The forward operating base was on the other side of the Zagros Mountains -- 500km away near Istafan (apparently). If the crash site and the extraction point were 200km apart ([as some claim](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhR6qPvUlk0))... did the guy walk that in 36 hours? There is clearly more to the story here. We probably won't know anytime soon.
13
Imperium_Dragon Apr 7, 2026 +9
The plane would’ve kept going for quite a long time after the pilots ejected. So yes it does make sense that the debris would be far from where the crew were recoveredz
9
mkbt Apr 7, 2026 +3
The pilot seat photos and the supposed extraction point of the 2nd airman are ~~reportedly~~ supposedly 100 miles apart... that has nothing to do with how far the air plane travels after ejection.
3
Sprangz Apr 7, 2026 +5
Crash site doesnt mean thats where the pilot landed and its also reported they walked non stop to get to a safer location from where they did land.
5
Picklesadog Apr 7, 2026 +5
That's a great point. If the jet was going 1,000mph when it was hit, it's quite possible the plane traveled another 100km after the pilots ejected before it hit the ground.
5
Explorer335 Apr 6, 2026 +3
The LZ was only 10 miles from the Isfahan nuclear facility, and 150 miles from where the first pilot was recovered from. The nuclear storage could have easily been in the bunkers even closer. The enriched uranium was already packaged in storage containers, and the C-130s are absolutely large enough to bring vehicles.
3
Funny-Ambition-7631 Apr 6, 2026 +548
Oh yeah we had 48 hours to capture the pilot but we failed now we need a cover-up. Makes sense IRGC
548
OtheDreamer Apr 6, 2026 +65
Even ***if*** this was all true....ok that's kind of what the US has been saying this whole time. No enriched uranium = no nuke materials. All around seems like a win/win at the expense of some hunks of metal so far.
65
1877KlownsForKids Apr 6, 2026 +45
We f****** had that under the JCPOA. Trump's dumb ass tore it up. We also had an open Strait. Trump's dumb ass caused it to close.
45
gimmethemshoes11 Apr 6, 2026 +40
You really think Iran was going to follow that? Did North Korea a much much weaker country? Hell no
40
Senior-Procedure-748 Apr 6, 2026 +71
That's a narrow minded take. The important parts of the JCPOA would've expired already anyway and it did nothing to limit their ballistic missiles. Since 2019 they have already reached 60% enrichment which is a short hop to the 90 needed for weapons and a far leap from the 3.6 that they were previously limited to.
71
Brambletail Apr 6, 2026 +59
Not to mention the JCPOA enforcement left a lot to be desired. It was a one way ticket for Iran to build nuclear weapons, just inconveniently and secretly. They will do that anyway though now, and likely only bribery can stop them. The cost of nuclear arsenal attainment must be higher than the gains of giving it up to achieve the goal.
59
ZumboPrime Apr 6, 2026 +5
LMAO, "narrow-minded". The treaty wasn't perfect, nobody is claiming it was. So clearly, instead of improving a diplomatic agreement after re-signing and increasing oversight and enforcement, the better thing to do is to start yet another war in the middle east, completely annihilate a third of the world's energy infrastructure, cripple a major shipping lane, and start bombing civilian infrastructure. Meanwhile, Israel has been claiming Iran is "months away" from nukes for over a decade. No f****** wonder the US is actively sabotaging its own global hegemony.
5
CrumblingSaturn Apr 6, 2026 +13
wait til you find out why Iran began enriching uranium again after the passage of the JCPOA...
13
Senior-Procedure-748 Apr 6, 2026 +18
Because they have always sought to have nuclear weapons? There is no mystery there.
18
SeaTurtleLionBird Apr 6, 2026 +29
The JCPOA is only 11 years old which means Trump wants to f*** it
29
TOTN_ Apr 6, 2026 +2
Those hunks of metal cost the real economy trillions of dollars.
2
denNISI Apr 6, 2026 +41
Do you think they would actually tell us what they are doing? Why were we told awhile back that Iran is "essentially really no longer a threat" yet US is taking out civilian bridges and posting "Praise be to Allah" on their social account? Confusing the people? Confusing you?
41
CyberNinja23 Apr 6, 2026 +36
If we’re confused the enemy is too. Solid strategy.
36
A_Monkey_FFBE Apr 6, 2026 +7
I’m more scared of unpredictability than I am of something being predictable. So this makes sense.
7
its_kgs_not_lbs Apr 6, 2026 +8
War isn't supposed to be predictable. The fact that we have an unstable person leading the country though is what makes things scary.
8
Facts_pls Apr 6, 2026 +4
Is that why US chose a lunatic at the top? So that nobody knows what's happening?
4
throwawayhyperbeam Apr 6, 2026 +74
Iran says a lot of things. Listnookors loves to believe them for some reason.
74
Greedy_Rabbit_1741 Apr 6, 2026 +16
It's a feedback loop. Iran gets their info from X and listnook. They then announce the shit they read on X and Listnook and people on X and Listnook further take the info from Iran and propagate it again.
16
alexios_kk Apr 6, 2026 +13
Listnook on AI slop: 🤬 Listnook on AI slop, Iran: 😍
13
84Cressida Apr 6, 2026 +38
Because they’re against Trump and the west, so that makes it okay to them.
38
Bitter_Tea442 Apr 6, 2026 +31
They also believe Hezbollah and Hamas. It is almost like there is some sort of pattern.
31
Sayakai Apr 6, 2026 +37
Would that be the enriched uranium everyone keeps telling me Iran has no intention to make?
37
Picklesadog Apr 7, 2026 +5
I've never heard anyone claim that.  The consensus is they ramped up their uranium enrichment when Trump pulled out of the deal. This has never been in denial.
5
Due_Wrangler9461 Apr 6, 2026 +3
No it's the one that was "obliterated" in the strikes a few months ago
3
SnooRegrets6428 Apr 6, 2026 +233
Sure. Irgc failed to capture the golden goose and trying to spin this off as a failed pirate mission
233
AngleParticular2914 Apr 6, 2026 +26
Best propaganda they could come up with because all they got from the Americans was a pair of undies and a half eaten MRE
26
Fancy_Exchange_9821 Apr 6, 2026 +150
Kinda embarrassing that they couldn’t stop tier 1 ops from rescuing the downed pilot despite their chest pounding
150
old_righty Apr 6, 2026 +14
(Tier 1 service staff looks around) “Am I elite?”
14
Lazy-Gene-7284 Apr 6, 2026 +97
I have to agree that was an impressive extraction. For all the c*** they are spewing it’s likely they are somewhat incompetent and clearly overmatched
97
TWIT_TWAT Apr 6, 2026 +112
The boogeyman checks under his bed at night for American tier 1 operators.
112
Fancy_Exchange_9821 Apr 6, 2026 +33
Basically They’re so so so so farther ahead from everyone else in skill, ability, and resources it’s not even funny
33
Canes-305 Apr 6, 2026 +33
Yet they are vulnerable all the same. The 2011 Extortion 17 shootdown is a good reminder. A single RPG brought down a CH-47 and killed dozens of elite tier 1 operators. The reality is you can have the best training, tech, and planning in the world, and still be vulnerable in contested territory. We shouldn’t get high on successes like this and start thinking it means we can do whatever we want in Iran or that escalation would be easy. That’s how you walk into a much bigger problem than you planned for.
33
Fancy_Exchange_9821 Apr 6, 2026 +31
Of course they’re not entirely untouchable They do go in on the highest risk missions anyways and have a solid success rate as even seen here
31
hilfigertout Apr 6, 2026 +10
>We shouldn’t get high on successes like this and start thinking it means we can do whatever we want in Iran or that escalation would be easy. That’s how you walk into a much bigger problem than you planned for. There are people who need to hear this statement, and they aren't browsing Listnook.
10
Wade_W_Wilson Apr 6, 2026 +13
No killed no wounded, with enough air assets to cover everyone this time. Good on the Yanks!
13
84Cressida Apr 6, 2026 +4
Nothing is invincible or perfect 10000% of the time but there is no equal to the US Military.
4
The-Herbal-Cure Apr 6, 2026 +1
S.A.S
1
84Cressida Apr 6, 2026 +5
It isn’t “likely”. It’s reality.
5
apexxin Apr 6, 2026 +3
This isn’t going as swimmingly as expected, but American military still has impressive capability.
3
CipherWeaver Apr 6, 2026
Iran is a big and it was in a remote area. Hard to find someone that doesn't want to be found, and they had the advantage in that they could signal to their rescuers when they wanted to be found. Also, much easier to search and rescue when you control the air, and the USA has air control, not Iran.
0
Key_Marsupial_1406 Apr 6, 2026 +13
All the reports suggest IRGC knew roughly where the pilot was at, but their search teams and equipment kept getting blown up and many IRGC were lost in the firefights.
13
WardAgainstNewbs Apr 6, 2026 +2
Not doubting you, but have any links to those reports? All I see are super vague recounts of the operation in the news.
2
84Cressida Apr 6, 2026 +12
It was near Isfahan, which is a populated area.
12
Sarnsereg Apr 6, 2026 +6
They already said they might take it... why would they make a cover story to do something they already said they were potentially going to do?
6
ResortClear730 Apr 6, 2026 +202
But I thought it was a completely failed operation? Oh wait, the IRGC is trying to save face after the US Military made them look incompetent by freely conducting a ground operation 200 miles in their own country. Sucks to suck, IRGC is incompetent.
202
hypatianata Apr 6, 2026 +5
No story here. This is very clearly a face-saving measure for internal loyalist consumption. It doesn’t even make much sense. 
5
Flatus_Diabolic Apr 6, 2026 +4
So, if that’s true (it isn’t) then that means the pilot that was supposedly rescued is still at large? Not even this administration would be so stupid as to claim to have rescued a person and then be unable to produce him when his family want to speak to him.
4
Mountainminer Apr 6, 2026 +99
You know, Iran’s speed to close the straight means they could do it any time. From a strategy perspective, I’m honestly glad they did it now and not when some other big oil crunch is going on. They’ve played their one card that has any meaning on the global stage and have demonstrated they would hurt the entire world. Which means, they were always going to play that card at any sign of conflict. I’m growing tired of the internet acting like Iran is some babe in the manger who would never do anything wrong. They’ve subjugated and controlled women since the 70s, threatened nearly every country around them, and committed countless human rights crimes. They kicked out the inspectors and canceled the agreement to inspect their uranium enrichment facilities. Is the US and Israel squeaky clean? No, but Iran being under pressure is a good thing. They’re making enemies of all their neighbors in the area. Soon enough the world will have enough of their shit. It might take 10 years, but at least everyone sees the risk for what it is now. I’ll get downvoted, but I’m glad we know how dependent the world economy is on that straight so that supply chains can be improved with alternate options. The world wants to keep the status quo, but you’ve got to think that the world leaders are also keen to take this card away from Iran permanently.
99
happy-cig Apr 6, 2026 +23
Far left rather see themselves get owned than to meet in the middle.  F*** Trump btw just in case bc far left and right are unlogical bullies. 
23
imissher4ever Apr 6, 2026 +8
But I thought they didn’t have any enriched uranium.
8
interested_commenter Apr 7, 2026 +4
Why would they use that as cover? The reason the US hasn't taken Iran's uranium is because it would be one of the most difficult military ops in history, not because the US doesn't want to. Degrading Iran's nuclear program is one of the stated goals for the war, there's no reason to hide it. If the US had successfully captured Iran's enriched uranium, they would not be covering it up and claiming the op was something else. Trump would be blasting it everywhere, claiming that it was the primary goal of the war the whole time, and declaring that he's open to a ceasefire because the US had now won the war.
4
PapaCaqu Apr 6, 2026 +10
Sure Jan
10
beragis Apr 6, 2026 +84
So now Iran admits they have enriched uranium. Not sure who us more stupid Trump or Iran’s leaders
84
CountryFriedSteak78 Apr 6, 2026 +37
I think they’ve acknowledged they have it. But claim it’s only for energy generation.
37
rmslashusr Apr 6, 2026 +40
No, they enriched up to 60% specifically so they’d be close to a bomb after we pulled out of the JCPOA as a response to that and an Israeli sabotage (their claimed reasoning). The cap under the JCPOA was 3.67%.
40
I_Am_Vladimir_Putin Apr 6, 2026 +6
You don't need it enriched to the same as level as nukes for energy.
6
Number6isNo1 Apr 6, 2026 +11
Iran has publicly stated they had/were producing 60% enriched uranium for years. This wasn't a secret. That's still not weapons grade, which is 90%, but it's getting there.
11
fury420 Apr 6, 2026 +23
Due to the funky way enrichment progress works, 60% is +98% of the way to 90%. When they started the natural uranium was ~99.3% the wrong isotope, and they've removed like ~98.8% of that waste, leaving a 60/40 mix of U235 and U238.
23
demonica123 Apr 6, 2026 +3
It's not particularly funky. It's just that once you have a cyclotron that can go from 3% to 60%, going the last 39% is just iterating on the same process.
3
MrShake4 Apr 6, 2026 +34
It’s worth noting there is no civilian use case for 60% enriched uranium, civilian reactors run at single digit enrichment.
34
Haplo12345 Apr 6, 2026 +2
60% is more than enough for dirty bomb territory. And very close to 90%+.
2
InterestingSpeaker Apr 6, 2026 +2
Not only do we already know that iran has enriched uranium, we know they've enriched upto 60%. That's because iran had allowed weapon inspectors into the country up until the 12 day war last year, even though they had limited access
2
vanceraa Apr 6, 2026 -9
Having enriched uranium ≠ having weapons-grade enriched uranium Iran has had a civilian nuclear programme for decades
-9
ersentenza Apr 6, 2026 +23
Oh, it is a bullshit contest now?
23
SkunkMonkey Apr 6, 2026 +3
The problem is that anything the Iranians can think up to make the US look bad is something Trump and his fucklenuts would proudly admit and take credit for. Honestly, I'd hate to be the one trying to think shit up.
3
Terrik1337 Apr 6, 2026 +3
Yes? I don't know why we would cover that up. That was one of the stated goals of the operation wasn't it? To prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Stealing the fuel for those weapons seems like a normal part of that.
3
hedokitali Apr 6, 2026 +3
What if both pilots got rescued during the first mission then the second one was the stealing of the enriched uranium?
3
Adventurous-Depth984 Apr 6, 2026 +5
So they have (or had) enriched uranium?
5
IamChwisss Apr 6, 2026 +8
Sure Iran. Because that's how transporting radioactive materials works. Not like you'd need specialized equipment and people to do it.
8
Mr_Terry-Folds Apr 6, 2026 +6
You can actually touch yellow cake and you'd be fine, even if enriched to very high levels.
6
IamChwisss Apr 6, 2026 +1
Oh you're right. And they probably left it out on the kitchen counter too. Totally plausible.
1
Mr_Terry-Folds Apr 6, 2026 +3
Oh definitely they didn't even plan to steal uranium in that rescue operation. I just pointed out you don't need special equipment to move it. It's not nuclear waste, which is what dangerously radioactive.
3
My2centsallday Apr 6, 2026 +11
The “Pirates of the Gulf “.
11
Ultra_Metal Apr 6, 2026 +17
The Islamic Republic is becoming more and more delusional every day. It's another sign of their imminent collapse. Hitler was saying delusional things too in his final days.
17
RothkoPollock Apr 6, 2026 +3
Good thing we have Trump acting, texting, and talking rationally as a nice contrast /s
3
NoBSforGma Apr 6, 2026 +5
That's just really REALLY funny. Made me laugh out loud. Of course, Iran always stores their "enriched uranium" in the deserted area where the plane crashed. And, of course, in the area where they ARE storing enriched uranium, they have no security and no way to detect and intercept an incursion. Please. I'm not in favor of this war, by any means, but Iran needs to get real.
5
TearsOfTheOrphan Apr 6, 2026 +4
Steal the enriched uranium Iran isn’t supposed to have in the first place?
4
CloudCobra979 Apr 6, 2026 +5
They're trying to claim some failed operation. US will move heaven and earth to rescue a downed aircrew. The pilots know that.
5
South-Researcher-322 Apr 6, 2026 +6
It's almost entertaining to see Iran compete for the most embarrassing administration in the world with the usa
6
Logical-Bookkeeper77 Apr 6, 2026 +4
And didn’t all the bots said Iran was keeping word and didn’t enrich uranium?
4
Leomonice61 Apr 6, 2026 +2
Well, both pilots are reportedly rescued, injured but now both doing really well according to Trump, not seen any names released yet, I would think their pictures would be everywhere across the media as hero’s…….
2
macvoice Apr 6, 2026 +2
So they are saying that we waited until an airplane got shot down, just so we could try and pull this off? I am not saying the Trump administration wouldn't try to swipe the Uranium. I am just saying that trying to disguise the theft as a rescue mission would require very specific timing that isn't really needed for something like that.
2
boot2skull Apr 6, 2026 +2
Are they saying we’re getting warmer? Seriously though, there are no consequences anymore. I don’t think this administration would cover or keep quiet after a success.
2
sonicneedslovetoo Apr 6, 2026 +2
Trump would be bragging on social media if that were the case.
2
hollyglaser Apr 6, 2026 +2
Loser
2
BlueSkyToday Apr 6, 2026 +2
Who would even want their stupid 60% enriched uranium? That's 20 times higher enrichment than reactors use. That stuff's useless. No one would want that.
2
Ashamed-Reaction-548 Apr 6, 2026 +2
There are two options. Either Iran is too stupid make nuclear weapons or they did not want to. For years Bibi has stated they are 2 weeks from nuclear weapons. If they wanted to enrich the uranium to the level needed they would have. There was nothing stopping them. The other option would have to be they do not have the capability or are not smart enough to do so. So they have been on the verge of nuclear weapons for 30+ but just can't quite figure it out. Otherwise the reality is they have not chosen to do so.
2
Apyan Apr 7, 2026 +2
It's like seeing two spoiled kids trying to look cool.
2
csmflynt3 Apr 7, 2026 +2
The propaganda coming out of Iranian media is almost as ridiculous as CNN .... It's comical to a sane person
2
sacklunchbaby Apr 7, 2026 +2
This was a SAR mission. They flew in 2x 130s with 2x little birds inside. The 130s got stuck and the little birds do not have the range to get outa there. They brought in a few different planes that did not get stuck and then blew up all the stuck shit as they were leaving.
2
IntelArtiGen Apr 6, 2026 +11
I do not trust the US with all the details of the operation but I'll clearly also not trust Iran for that. I guess it might be hard to have the complete truth quickly. Iran probably doesn't know much, and even the CIA admitted they used a deception campaign during the rescue. So if we think we clearly know what happened, well we might be wrong.
11
traplords8n Apr 6, 2026 +13
War is always deception. I wouldn't be surprised if the US military asked Trump to say ridiculous things and play into it tbh. If all those generals come back I would be like "ope, yep they were tricking Iran" Not that I think that's likely or anything, and I'm definitely not trying to speak highly of trumps competence, it's just that anything can be a deception or bluff when it comes to war.
13
ChiefStrongbones Apr 6, 2026 +3
Did Trump take control over Iran's twitter account and start shitposting?
3
Nd343343 Apr 6, 2026 +3
Forgive my ignorance, but have they previously admitted to possession enriched uranium prior to this?
3
Jsr1 Apr 6, 2026 +8
So you do have enriched uranium……
8
tauberculosis Apr 6, 2026
Yep, this was always a well known fact and common knowledge. It’s just not enriched enough for nuclear weapons. It was agreed upon that it wouldn’t be enriched more than ~60% for energy needs.
0
ShamanSix01 Apr 6, 2026 +4
And there lies the rub with nuclear energy.
4
FreedomPlus9756 Apr 6, 2026 +5
Let's be honest. Both sides of this war are extremely untrustworthy at this point
5
Prineak Apr 6, 2026 +6
So Iran admits to having enriched uranium?
6
nullbyte420 Apr 6, 2026 +8
That's no secret? They had IAEA inspections too, until they didn't like that anymore
8
ShutterPriority Apr 6, 2026 +5
"The wreckage of an American aircraft and a helicopter rotor is seen in Isfahan, Iran, April 5, 2026. (Reuters Photo)" Mmmm... Excellent caption boys! That's a set of C-130 nacelles. No helicopter rotor in sight -- unless we suddenly sent some never-before-seen super-secret-squirrel 6-bladed Osprey's out there. That's probably indicative of the quality of their reporting to apply to the rest of this article.
5
fury420 Apr 6, 2026 +3
The other photos of that debris field do show helicopter rotors too, I think the caption may have been shared among them? And they happened to have six bladed rotors as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD_Helicopters_MH-6_Little_Bird https://www.twz.com/air/night-stalker-little-bird-helicopters-destroyed-at-forward-landing-site-in-iran
3
hbtljose13 Apr 6, 2026 +2
I wouldn’t put it pass the current administration to let American pilots in situations even if there’s a chance of getting shot down knowing special forces can get live training on quick, effective extractions for an eventual operation against enemy targets . They need good PR for future missions involving boots on the ground.
2
kilobitch Apr 6, 2026 +2
Nothing wrong with stealing enriched uranium from a terrorist state.
2
SLR107FR-31 Apr 6, 2026 +4
Sooooo that whole "We aren't enriching uranium" thing was bullshit then?
4
Wicked_Black Apr 6, 2026 +2
They’ve already admitted to it
2
44Stryker44 Apr 6, 2026 +2
If that were the case, they would have succeeded
2
Twodogsonecouch Apr 6, 2026 +2
Ummm trust me if it was it wouldnt be secret trump couldnt shit himself up. Now since you suggested it hes gonna say it was Edit: hahahahahahaha the typo was accidental but im leaving it.
2
Captain_Wag Apr 6, 2026 +2
Yes that's what any smart individual would do. Put enriched uranium on a chopper and fly it through a war zone. What could possibly go wrong. That chopper can definitely haul a good amount of uranium with the small caliber armaments it has on board.
2
Affectionate_Bee6434 Apr 6, 2026 +3
What might support their claim is that the farp was set up very close to Isfahan which is an IRGC strong hold, a very strategic city but again the operations to steal enriched uranium is a fairy tale dream. The uranium is located deep underground and is guarded by the most elite soldiers they have. The second CSAR round was always going to be extremely challenging and they probably thought a small scale one had a high chance of failure. They probably flew small helicopters inside cargo planes inside Iran and then did the rescue through that.
3
Professional-Ad3874 Apr 6, 2026 +4
Its a PR statement by Iran since they failed to capture the pilot. Like US troops were going to carry it all out by hand? Also, not to pick a fight but no one puts "their most elite" soldiers underground guarding something no foot soldiers are likely to ever reach. What a waste that would be. We can save that for the scripts for whatever movies are made about this.
4
AlaskaStiletto Apr 6, 2026 +3
This theory is everywhere. Everywhere across social media. No one trusts anything coming out of Trump’s White House.
3
platoface541 Apr 6, 2026 +1
This is the first I’ve seen of them confirming they have enriched uranium….
1
fury420 Apr 6, 2026 +9
Then you haven't been paying attention, Iran has literally have shown IAEA inspectors their stockpiles of 60% enriched, it's detailed in their reports.
9
FiftyLoudCats Apr 6, 2026 +3
This is just non-sensical Iranian propaganda to save face since they couldn’t find either pilot. Nevertheless, useful idiots of the west and social media will run with it. I have grown a strong resentment to this website but here I am…
3
← Back to Board