...why would they expect anyone to believe that we would need a cover at this point?
If that was the goal it'd just happen.
1891
ineyeseekayApr 6, 2026
+622
It would be a late night tweet in all caps that we stole their shit.
622
OtheDreamerApr 6, 2026
+209
That’s how you know we didn’t really snatch their uranium….this time
209
ineyeseekayApr 6, 2026
+57
I wouldn't be surprised if an official white House announcement included "nana nana booboo"
57
DramaticWesleyApr 6, 2026
+14
It would be profanity-laden, like many of his recent late night tweets.
14
leanpunzzApr 6, 2026
+24
I STOLE THAT SHIT, STRAIGHT STOLE THAT SHIT
24
KP_WrathApr 6, 2026
+11
*that our brave men and women are actively taking it. Do you really think he’d wait until our people were out of dodge before running his mouth about it?
11
NotSoAwfulNameApr 6, 2026
+5
This is a Rust public server, we just didn't realise it.
5
InterstellarRedditApr 6, 2026
+13
It would be on the signal chat too
13
Adventurous_Light_85Apr 6, 2026
+84
Right. Its like “ hey we’re going to bomb and destroy your country, but we’re going to very sneakily take your uranium”
84
Amoral_AbeApr 6, 2026
+32
It's worse than that. It's like, "hey, were going to bomb and destroy you and also seize all your uranium and make sure you can never get any more".
"Ok.... Shhh guys, we don't want them to know we are siezing their uranium... That we told them were siezing"
32
redwing66Apr 7, 2026
+2
And wherever that uranium is now, it's either buried, or under very heavy guard. Would a couple of C130s and some helicopters really be enough to pull that off? You'd have to bring enough special operators for a heavy and extended firefight, and there would almost certainly be casualties.
2
HerezahTipApr 6, 2026
+2
Well, we went into Venezuela to “stop the drugs” and we brought back a shitload of their gold and sold their oil while trump took deposits in offshore accounts. Sooo I wouldn’t put it past them to do that.
2
wta3445Apr 6, 2026
+6
The gold and oil were both announced by the Trump administration. The point is they don't care or need to hide when they do shit. It's all out in the open.
6
Straight-faced_soloApr 7, 2026
+3
Oh its definitely not **ALL** out in the open. This admin does tons of fucked up crazy shit, that we only learn about later. Did you know we invaded north korea during his first term and killed a boat full of fisherman. It happened back in 2019. Congress didn't learn about it until 2021, and it wasn't made public knowledge until 2025.
3
HerezahTipApr 6, 2026
+2
Oh hunny, it’s not *all* out in the open. We will be learning about this administration’s crimes for decades.
2
AvatarOfMomusApr 6, 2026
+33
It might make some sense to put up a front as Iran would respond much more strongly to an operation that might be going after their Uranium stockpiles compared to a rescue operation...
That's the answer to your question, but this is still nonsense, since as far as we know most if not all of Iran's enriched Uranium stockpile is trapped behind hundreds of tons of rubble in tunnels under that mountain the US bunker-buster'ed last year.
It's pretty hard to do a "smash and grab" operation that involves several weeks (at least) of construction work...
33
crazedizzledApr 6, 2026
+9
Iran is already playing the only card they have.
9
Hanako_lkezawaApr 6, 2026
+44
My creative brain is trying to spin a conspiracy out of this question so bare with me:
They're possibly setting the groundwork to claim "false flag" for a potential future nuclear detonation or other radiological incident.
"OH, you stole that enriched uranium a while ago, and coincidentally you get hit by a terrorist dirty bomb / nuke that is being tied back to and blamed on us? You must have used the stolen uranium in a false flag to drum up war support 😤"
44
MistrblankApr 6, 2026
+21
So we're in the "I know you know that I know that you know, but you don't know that I know that you know I know you know" phase of fuckery?
21
CMDR_ACE209Apr 6, 2026
+19
I wish I knew. 🤷♂️
19
MistrblankApr 6, 2026
+6
Great, now I know that you wish you knew, but did you know that?
6
CMDR_ACE209Apr 6, 2026
+3
I didn't; but since you just told me, now I do. Which means that I probably...
Wait.. what was the topic again?
3
TomKirkman1Apr 6, 2026
+7
I was thinking of it more as a mindgame to try and throw off what the actual location is.
If they privately maintain this line and stay appearing sincere about it, it indicates that they're storing it there (even if they actually aren't).
If they make it look like they're bluffing, then they hope the US thinks it's stored elsewhere (even though it's actually there).
7
Manos_Of_FateApr 6, 2026
+93
Also, our SecDef is a raging alcoholic who accidentally committed capital espionage offenses effectively *in front of a reporter* because he was trying to skirt records laws. Operational security isn’t exactly his strong suit.
93
haveanairforcedayApr 6, 2026
+16
Say more?
16
Manos_Of_FateApr 6, 2026
+56
They accidentally invited a reporter to a Signal chat where they were discussing operational security. This was last spring.
56
MercantileReptileApr 6, 2026
+30
The middle of March 2025 feels like approximately eighty dipshit scandals out of Washington ago. Barely a day goes by without some bullshit, I don't blame anyone for not remembering "Signalgate".
30
mockgApr 6, 2026
+10
I miss the days when the administration in charge wasn't front page news everyday. I remember during Biden and Obama things were mainly in the background.
10
EatLardApr 6, 2026
+6
I remember not thinking “what did that dumb f*** do this time?” every time the president or sec def was in the news.
6
InveignApr 6, 2026
+2
That was last year...? Felt like a decade ago. Man, there sure is many years fitting into 12 months...
2
haveanairforcedayApr 6, 2026
+5
Ohh i thought a new thing happened
5
MagjeeApr 6, 2026
+2
*Sir, a third signal chat has leaked*
2
ClearlyCylindricalApr 6, 2026
+4
And trump would be posting it online immediately after
4
Prestigious-Smoke511Apr 6, 2026
+7
I don’t think the cover was intended to fool us. It was probably indented to fool Iran.
That’s my guess anyway.
7
Jest_out_for_a_RipApr 6, 2026
+2
Presumably it would be cover to prevent Iran from knowing. Because they would contest trying to take the uranium far harder than a downed airman.
2
XastherApr 6, 2026
+2
This has to be the most absurd, yet most convincing, counter-argument that could have been brought up here.
2
VicorinApr 6, 2026
+456
If they had been securing uranium, they would be bragging about it right now.
456
CoyotesOnTheWingApr 6, 2026
+145
Unless the mission failed
145
RontoWrapsApr 6, 2026
+144
But then Iran would be boasting about why it failed.
It just didn’t happen.
144
HumansNeedNotApply1Apr 6, 2026
+34
Err... this is exactly what Iran is saying and boasting?
34
Whoop-SeesApr 7, 2026
+24
Uhhh no? “The possibility that this was a deception operation to steal enriched uranium should not be ignored at all." This is not Iran saying “they attempted to steal our uranium and we foiled the attempt”
24
YouMeAndReneDupreeApr 7, 2026
+2
You can't just put Uranium in your pockets and leave lol. It's so heavy
2
106Apr 6, 2026
+742
Rescuing both pilots and making off with some bonus uranium? That’s just showing off…
742
Torched420Apr 6, 2026
+122
Think they replaced it with pinball machine parts?
122
GoingLurkingApr 6, 2026
+40
That’s what got doc killed.
40
Glaurung8404Apr 6, 2026
+7
It’s ok he wore a bullet proof vest
7
MosesOnAcidApr 6, 2026
+39
While rescuing the pilots a side quest popped up
39
ThePickleConnoisseurApr 6, 2026
+22
[Optional] Yoink Uranium
22
PapstJL4UApr 6, 2026
+7
Runner, profit opportunity nearby!
7
valeyard89Apr 6, 2026
+13
I'm sure that in 2026, plutonium is available in every corner drugstore, but in 1955 it's a little hard to come by.
13
fireky2Apr 6, 2026
+24
They wouldnt be able to do that. The enriched uranium is buried in rubble. Its going to take at best a few weeks to get it out.
Now could they be using it as a cover for recon or to test out air defense/ground defense for an eventual attempt to do an operation, very likely
24
RobertLeeSwaggerApr 6, 2026
+514
Is it just me or does Iran seem to track various theories online and then provide support for those theories. It’s a smart disinformation strategy if so and there’s been at least a few times where it turned out to be fact.
514
Mr_Terry-FoldsApr 6, 2026
+236
Either this, or they even the ones to spread it from the first place.
236
86rptApr 6, 2026
+100
I believe they seed many of them, and water the ones that grow.
100
smegdawgApr 6, 2026
+18
Was my old dating strategy!
18
86rptApr 6, 2026
+5
Hopefully you're not swinging between two trees in a hammock big playa 🤣
5
smegdawgApr 6, 2026
+12
Oh I was a really shitty gardener.
Mostly just weeds that developed thorns until my friend hooked me up with my now wife 16 years ago.
12
86rptApr 6, 2026
+6
Always best to take a cutting 🤣
6
AngleParticular2914Apr 6, 2026
+12
100% believe this to be the case, there’s a lot of accounts in this site that are spewing hot garbage about this war 24/7
12
Most-Round-4132Apr 6, 2026
+23
They saw how effective it was for the Russians I suppose
23
SlggyqoApr 6, 2026
+140
This a propaganda war. Iran is NOT going to win it by taking on America head on.
They don’t even have a method of reaching the USA, meanwhile we’ve got low flying helicopters all over Iran looking for ONE guy.
Convincing everyone that the war is pointless and American can’t be trusted (and especially shouldn’t be followed into battle) is the real angle.
140
cristianserran0Apr 6, 2026
+23
People don’t need much convincing, though. So also low hanging fruit.
23
cletus_spuckleApr 6, 2026
+1
Not to mention everyone has known this for decades and everyone still does massive amounts of business with the US.
It’s still the world’s premier superpower
1
SaintsNoah14Apr 6, 2026
+2
Always is.
2
84CressidaApr 6, 2026
+34
They see the stupid shit listnook posts and then say shit to appeal to those morons.
34
hack404Apr 6, 2026
+20
Probably writing some of the posts
20
yoogle1Apr 6, 2026
+48
Agreed I saw this dumbass take on X before IRGC started parroting it
48
SLR107FR-31Apr 6, 2026
+19
Russia's been doing it for 80 years
19
PaithegiftApr 6, 2026
+35
It isn't just you, the Islamic Republic terrorist network has been doing it forever. It's also not that smart, just having no qualms about changing your stories on a whim to gain the sympathy of the useful idiots in the West.
35
Muggsy423Apr 6, 2026
+6
Their shitposting department is on overdrive
6
hypatianataApr 6, 2026
+4
Maybe I’m crazy, but it seems like since Russia and Iran started collaborating, the IRI’s propaganda and behavior have incorporated more of the things Russia is more known for (such as a firehose approach, support all sides, etc). There was a rumor they were getting “security” help from Russia for controlling internal dissent.
4
imasammichApr 6, 2026
+10
It seems to me Iran's entire online strategy is to cater to listnook and listnookors. Its really the only place pro iranian and iranian propaganda has legs.
So they either are creating it from scratch or they realized listnookors will reposts/upvote and take as 100% fact anything Iran puts out there as long as it supports the average listnookors political opinions and their view of the US.
10
HowManyMeesesApr 6, 2026
+18
This is the same strategy the GOP has been using for years. A lot of their major talking points, like Haitian's eating pets in the US, originate in conspiracy forums. They track what's gaining traction and run with it.
Edit: During the election, you could see what they'd move to next based on listnook's conspiracy sublistnook. It was especially interesting watching the conservative sublistnook have a collection of talking points that would collapse into whichever one was gaining the most traction.
18
NativeMassholeApr 6, 2026
+13
It's also how the Russian psyops work. They just take known issues and make divisionist statements about them online to stir up unrest. The only difference here is that Iran is doing it very publicly to counteract our shitposting president. He's literally making it easier for them.
13
EggNo289Apr 6, 2026
+2
Welcome to social media, where bad actors and bots backed by Iran, Russia, Israel, China, DPRK, Hungary, and others create and spread Culture War, misinformation, and psy-ops campaigns RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR FACES and we click on it, engage with it, share it, etc.
2
OrdoXenosApr 6, 2026
+72
The allegations are ridiculous. US soldiers aren’t wearing Iron Man suits. They are not the Hulk or Space Marines.
They can’t dig out tons of rubble, transported 1,000 pounds of nuclear materials on their back for 22 miles, and load them to the aircraft without some sort of heavy equipment.
And none of them are seen. The wreckage have the Little Birds, but not a single heavy equipment are seen.
72
teokun123Apr 7, 2026
+3
this shit is funny lmao. Troll wars.
3
mkbtApr 6, 2026
+13
[CNN geolocated the initial CSAR operations near the the Karoon River.](https://www.twz.com/air/photos-of-f-15e-wreckage-emerge-amid-iranian-claims-it-shot-down-an-american-fighter)
The forward operating base was on the other side of the Zagros Mountains -- 500km away near Istafan (apparently). If the crash site and the extraction point were 200km apart ([as some claim](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhR6qPvUlk0))... did the guy walk that in 36 hours?
There is clearly more to the story here. We probably won't know anytime soon.
13
Imperium_DragonApr 7, 2026
+9
The plane would’ve kept going for quite a long time after the pilots ejected. So yes it does make sense that the debris would be far from where the crew were recoveredz
9
mkbtApr 7, 2026
+3
The pilot seat photos and the supposed extraction point of the 2nd airman are ~~reportedly~~ supposedly 100 miles apart... that has nothing to do with how far the air plane travels after ejection.
3
SprangzApr 7, 2026
+5
Crash site doesnt mean thats where the pilot landed and its also reported they walked non stop to get to a safer location from where they did land.
5
PicklesadogApr 7, 2026
+5
That's a great point. If the jet was going 1,000mph when it was hit, it's quite possible the plane traveled another 100km after the pilots ejected before it hit the ground.
5
Explorer335Apr 6, 2026
+3
The LZ was only 10 miles from the Isfahan nuclear facility, and 150 miles from where the first pilot was recovered from. The nuclear storage could have easily been in the bunkers even closer. The enriched uranium was already packaged in storage containers, and the C-130s are absolutely large enough to bring vehicles.
3
Funny-Ambition-7631Apr 6, 2026
+548
Oh yeah we had 48 hours to capture the pilot but we failed now we need a cover-up. Makes sense IRGC
548
OtheDreamerApr 6, 2026
+65
Even ***if*** this was all true....ok that's kind of what the US has been saying this whole time. No enriched uranium = no nuke materials. All around seems like a win/win at the expense of some hunks of metal so far.
65
1877KlownsForKidsApr 6, 2026
+45
We f****** had that under the JCPOA. Trump's dumb ass tore it up.
We also had an open Strait. Trump's dumb ass caused it to close.
45
gimmethemshoes11Apr 6, 2026
+40
You really think Iran was going to follow that?
Did North Korea a much much weaker country? Hell no
40
Senior-Procedure-748Apr 6, 2026
+71
That's a narrow minded take. The important parts of the JCPOA would've expired already anyway and it did nothing to limit their ballistic missiles. Since 2019 they have already reached 60% enrichment which is a short hop to the 90 needed for weapons and a far leap from the 3.6 that they were previously limited to.
71
BrambletailApr 6, 2026
+59
Not to mention the JCPOA enforcement left a lot to be desired. It was a one way ticket for Iran to build nuclear weapons, just inconveniently and secretly.
They will do that anyway though now, and likely only bribery can stop them. The cost of nuclear arsenal attainment must be higher than the gains of giving it up to achieve the goal.
59
ZumboPrimeApr 6, 2026
+5
LMAO, "narrow-minded". The treaty wasn't perfect, nobody is claiming it was. So clearly, instead of improving a diplomatic agreement after re-signing and increasing oversight and enforcement, the better thing to do is to start yet another war in the middle east, completely annihilate a third of the world's energy infrastructure, cripple a major shipping lane, and start bombing civilian infrastructure.
Meanwhile, Israel has been claiming Iran is "months away" from nukes for over a decade. No f****** wonder the US is actively sabotaging its own global hegemony.
5
CrumblingSaturnApr 6, 2026
+13
wait til you find out why Iran began enriching uranium again after the passage of the JCPOA...
13
Senior-Procedure-748Apr 6, 2026
+18
Because they have always sought to have nuclear weapons? There is no mystery there.
18
SeaTurtleLionBirdApr 6, 2026
+29
The JCPOA is only 11 years old which means Trump wants to f*** it
29
TOTN_Apr 6, 2026
+2
Those hunks of metal cost the real economy trillions of dollars.
2
denNISIApr 6, 2026
+41
Do you think they would actually tell us what they are doing? Why were we told awhile back that Iran is "essentially really no longer a threat" yet US is taking out civilian bridges and posting "Praise be to Allah" on their social account? Confusing the people? Confusing you?
41
CyberNinja23Apr 6, 2026
+36
If we’re confused the enemy is too. Solid strategy.
36
A_Monkey_FFBEApr 6, 2026
+7
I’m more scared of unpredictability than I am of something being predictable. So this makes sense.
7
its_kgs_not_lbsApr 6, 2026
+8
War isn't supposed to be predictable. The fact that we have an unstable person leading the country though is what makes things scary.
8
Facts_plsApr 6, 2026
+4
Is that why US chose a lunatic at the top? So that nobody knows what's happening?
4
throwawayhyperbeamApr 6, 2026
+74
Iran says a lot of things. Listnookors loves to believe them for some reason.
74
Greedy_Rabbit_1741Apr 6, 2026
+16
It's a feedback loop.
Iran gets their info from X and listnook. They then announce the shit they read on X and Listnook and people on X and Listnook further take the info from Iran and propagate it again.
16
alexios_kkApr 6, 2026
+13
Listnook on AI slop: 🤬
Listnook on AI slop, Iran: 😍
13
84CressidaApr 6, 2026
+38
Because they’re against Trump and the west, so that makes it okay to them.
38
Bitter_Tea442Apr 6, 2026
+31
They also believe Hezbollah and Hamas. It is almost like there is some sort of pattern.
31
SayakaiApr 6, 2026
+37
Would that be the enriched uranium everyone keeps telling me Iran has no intention to make?
37
PicklesadogApr 7, 2026
+5
I've never heard anyone claim that.
The consensus is they ramped up their uranium enrichment when Trump pulled out of the deal. This has never been in denial.
5
Due_Wrangler9461Apr 6, 2026
+3
No it's the one that was "obliterated" in the strikes a few months ago
3
SnooRegrets6428Apr 6, 2026
+233
Sure. Irgc failed to capture the golden goose and trying to spin this off as a failed pirate mission
233
AngleParticular2914Apr 6, 2026
+26
Best propaganda they could come up with because all they got from the Americans was a pair of undies and a half eaten MRE
26
Fancy_Exchange_9821Apr 6, 2026
+150
Kinda embarrassing that they couldn’t stop tier 1 ops from rescuing the downed pilot despite their chest pounding
150
old_rightyApr 6, 2026
+14
(Tier 1 service staff looks around)
“Am I elite?”
14
Lazy-Gene-7284Apr 6, 2026
+97
I have to agree that was an impressive extraction. For all the c*** they are spewing it’s likely they are somewhat incompetent and clearly overmatched
97
TWIT_TWATApr 6, 2026
+112
The boogeyman checks under his bed at night for American tier 1 operators.
112
Fancy_Exchange_9821Apr 6, 2026
+33
Basically
They’re so so so so farther ahead from everyone else in skill, ability, and resources it’s not even funny
33
Canes-305Apr 6, 2026
+33
Yet they are vulnerable all the same.
The 2011 Extortion 17 shootdown is a good reminder. A single RPG brought down a CH-47 and killed dozens of elite tier 1 operators.
The reality is you can have the best training, tech, and planning in the world, and still be vulnerable in contested territory.
We shouldn’t get high on successes like this and start thinking it means we can do whatever we want in Iran or that escalation would be easy. That’s how you walk into a much bigger problem than you planned for.
33
Fancy_Exchange_9821Apr 6, 2026
+31
Of course they’re not entirely untouchable
They do go in on the highest risk missions anyways and have a solid success rate as even seen here
31
hilfigertoutApr 6, 2026
+10
>We shouldn’t get high on successes like this and start thinking it means we can do whatever we want in Iran or that escalation would be easy. That’s how you walk into a much bigger problem than you planned for.
There are people who need to hear this statement, and they aren't browsing Listnook.
10
Wade_W_WilsonApr 6, 2026
+13
No killed no wounded, with enough air assets to cover everyone this time. Good on the Yanks!
13
84CressidaApr 6, 2026
+4
Nothing is invincible or perfect 10000% of the time but there is no equal to the US Military.
4
The-Herbal-CureApr 6, 2026
+1
S.A.S
1
84CressidaApr 6, 2026
+5
It isn’t “likely”. It’s reality.
5
apexxinApr 6, 2026
+3
This isn’t going as swimmingly as expected, but American military still has impressive capability.
3
CipherWeaverApr 6, 2026
Iran is a big and it was in a remote area. Hard to find someone that doesn't want to be found, and they had the advantage in that they could signal to their rescuers when they wanted to be found.
Also, much easier to search and rescue when you control the air, and the USA has air control, not Iran.
0
Key_Marsupial_1406Apr 6, 2026
+13
All the reports suggest IRGC knew roughly where the pilot was at, but their search teams and equipment kept getting blown up and many IRGC were lost in the firefights.
13
WardAgainstNewbsApr 6, 2026
+2
Not doubting you, but have any links to those reports? All I see are super vague recounts of the operation in the news.
2
84CressidaApr 6, 2026
+12
It was near Isfahan, which is a populated area.
12
SarnseregApr 6, 2026
+6
They already said they might take it... why would they make a cover story to do something they already said they were potentially going to do?
6
ResortClear730Apr 6, 2026
+202
But I thought it was a completely failed operation? Oh wait, the IRGC is trying to save face after the US Military made them look incompetent by freely conducting a ground operation 200 miles in their own country. Sucks to suck, IRGC is incompetent.
202
hypatianataApr 6, 2026
+5
No story here. This is very clearly a face-saving measure for internal loyalist consumption. It doesn’t even make much sense.
5
Flatus_DiabolicApr 6, 2026
+4
So, if that’s true (it isn’t) then that means the pilot that was supposedly rescued is still at large?
Not even this administration would be so stupid as to claim to have rescued a person and then be unable to produce him when his family want to speak to him.
4
MountainminerApr 6, 2026
+99
You know, Iran’s speed to close the straight means they could do it any time. From a strategy perspective, I’m honestly glad they did it now and not when some other big oil crunch is going on. They’ve played their one card that has any meaning on the global stage and have demonstrated they would hurt the entire world. Which means, they were always going to play that card at any sign of conflict.
I’m growing tired of the internet acting like Iran is some babe in the manger who would never do anything wrong.
They’ve subjugated and controlled women since the 70s, threatened nearly every country around them, and committed countless human rights crimes. They kicked out the inspectors and canceled the agreement to inspect their uranium enrichment facilities.
Is the US and Israel squeaky clean? No, but Iran being under pressure is a good thing. They’re making enemies of all their neighbors in the area. Soon enough the world will have enough of their shit. It might take 10 years, but at least everyone sees the risk for what it is now.
I’ll get downvoted, but I’m glad we know how dependent the world economy is on that straight so that supply chains can be improved with alternate options.
The world wants to keep the status quo, but you’ve got to think that the world leaders are also keen to take this card away from Iran permanently.
99
happy-cigApr 6, 2026
+23
Far left rather see themselves get owned than to meet in the middle.
F*** Trump btw just in case bc far left and right are unlogical bullies.
23
imissher4everApr 6, 2026
+8
But I thought they didn’t have any enriched uranium.
8
interested_commenterApr 7, 2026
+4
Why would they use that as cover?
The reason the US hasn't taken Iran's uranium is because it would be one of the most difficult military ops in history, not because the US doesn't want to. Degrading Iran's nuclear program is one of the stated goals for the war, there's no reason to hide it.
If the US had successfully captured Iran's enriched uranium, they would not be covering it up and claiming the op was something else. Trump would be blasting it everywhere, claiming that it was the primary goal of the war the whole time, and declaring that he's open to a ceasefire because the US had now won the war.
4
PapaCaquApr 6, 2026
+10
Sure Jan
10
beragisApr 6, 2026
+84
So now Iran admits they have enriched uranium. Not sure who us more stupid Trump or Iran’s leaders
84
CountryFriedSteak78Apr 6, 2026
+37
I think they’ve acknowledged they have it. But claim it’s only for energy generation.
37
rmslashusrApr 6, 2026
+40
No, they enriched up to 60% specifically so they’d be close to a bomb after we pulled out of the JCPOA as a response to that and an Israeli sabotage (their claimed reasoning). The cap under the JCPOA was 3.67%.
40
I_Am_Vladimir_PutinApr 6, 2026
+6
You don't need it enriched to the same as level as nukes for energy.
6
Number6isNo1Apr 6, 2026
+11
Iran has publicly stated they had/were producing 60% enriched uranium for years. This wasn't a secret. That's still not weapons grade, which is 90%, but it's getting there.
11
fury420Apr 6, 2026
+23
Due to the funky way enrichment progress works, 60% is +98% of the way to 90%.
When they started the natural uranium was ~99.3% the wrong isotope, and they've removed like ~98.8% of that waste, leaving a 60/40 mix of U235 and U238.
23
demonica123Apr 6, 2026
+3
It's not particularly funky. It's just that once you have a cyclotron that can go from 3% to 60%, going the last 39% is just iterating on the same process.
3
MrShake4Apr 6, 2026
+34
It’s worth noting there is no civilian use case for 60% enriched uranium, civilian reactors run at single digit enrichment.
34
Haplo12345Apr 6, 2026
+2
60% is more than enough for dirty bomb territory. And very close to 90%+.
2
InterestingSpeakerApr 6, 2026
+2
Not only do we already know that iran has enriched uranium, we know they've enriched upto 60%. That's because iran had allowed weapon inspectors into the country up until the 12 day war last year, even though they had limited access
2
vanceraaApr 6, 2026
-9
Having enriched uranium ≠ having weapons-grade enriched uranium
Iran has had a civilian nuclear programme for decades
-9
ersentenzaApr 6, 2026
+23
Oh, it is a bullshit contest now?
23
SkunkMonkeyApr 6, 2026
+3
The problem is that anything the Iranians can think up to make the US look bad is something Trump and his fucklenuts would proudly admit and take credit for. Honestly, I'd hate to be the one trying to think shit up.
3
Terrik1337Apr 6, 2026
+3
Yes? I don't know why we would cover that up. That was one of the stated goals of the operation wasn't it? To prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Stealing the fuel for those weapons seems like a normal part of that.
3
hedokitaliApr 6, 2026
+3
What if both pilots got rescued during the first mission then the second one was the stealing of the enriched uranium?
3
Adventurous-Depth984Apr 6, 2026
+5
So they have (or had) enriched uranium?
5
IamChwisssApr 6, 2026
+8
Sure Iran. Because that's how transporting radioactive materials works. Not like you'd need specialized equipment and people to do it.
8
Mr_Terry-FoldsApr 6, 2026
+6
You can actually touch yellow cake and you'd be fine, even if enriched to very high levels.
6
IamChwisssApr 6, 2026
+1
Oh you're right. And they probably left it out on the kitchen counter too. Totally plausible.
1
Mr_Terry-FoldsApr 6, 2026
+3
Oh definitely they didn't even plan to steal uranium in that rescue operation. I just pointed out you don't need special equipment to move it. It's not nuclear waste, which is what dangerously radioactive.
3
My2centsalldayApr 6, 2026
+11
The “Pirates of the Gulf “.
11
Ultra_MetalApr 6, 2026
+17
The Islamic Republic is becoming more and more delusional every day. It's another sign of their imminent collapse. Hitler was saying delusional things too in his final days.
17
RothkoPollockApr 6, 2026
+3
Good thing we have Trump acting, texting, and talking rationally as a nice contrast /s
3
NoBSforGmaApr 6, 2026
+5
That's just really REALLY funny. Made me laugh out loud. Of course, Iran always stores their "enriched uranium" in the deserted area where the plane crashed. And, of course, in the area where they ARE storing enriched uranium, they have no security and no way to detect and intercept an incursion. Please.
I'm not in favor of this war, by any means, but Iran needs to get real.
5
TearsOfTheOrphanApr 6, 2026
+4
Steal the enriched uranium Iran isn’t supposed to have in the first place?
4
CloudCobra979Apr 6, 2026
+5
They're trying to claim some failed operation. US will move heaven and earth to rescue a downed aircrew. The pilots know that.
5
South-Researcher-322Apr 6, 2026
+6
It's almost entertaining to see Iran compete for the most embarrassing administration in the world with the usa
6
Logical-Bookkeeper77Apr 6, 2026
+4
And didn’t all the bots said Iran was keeping word and didn’t enrich uranium?
4
Leomonice61Apr 6, 2026
+2
Well, both pilots are reportedly rescued, injured but now both doing really well according to Trump, not seen any names released yet, I would think their pictures would be everywhere across the media as hero’s…….
2
macvoiceApr 6, 2026
+2
So they are saying that we waited until an airplane got shot down, just so we could try and pull this off?
I am not saying the Trump administration wouldn't try to swipe the Uranium. I am just saying that trying to disguise the theft as a rescue mission would require very specific timing that isn't really needed for something like that.
2
boot2skullApr 6, 2026
+2
Are they saying we’re getting warmer? Seriously though, there are no consequences anymore. I don’t think this administration would cover or keep quiet after a success.
2
sonicneedslovetooApr 6, 2026
+2
Trump would be bragging on social media if that were the case.
2
hollyglaserApr 6, 2026
+2
Loser
2
BlueSkyTodayApr 6, 2026
+2
Who would even want their stupid 60% enriched uranium? That's 20 times higher enrichment than reactors use. That stuff's useless. No one would want that.
2
Ashamed-Reaction-548Apr 6, 2026
+2
There are two options. Either Iran is too stupid make nuclear weapons or they did not want to. For years Bibi has stated they are 2 weeks from nuclear weapons. If they wanted to enrich the uranium to the level needed they would have. There was nothing stopping them. The other option would have to be they do not have the capability or are not smart enough to do so. So they have been on the verge of nuclear weapons for 30+ but just can't quite figure it out. Otherwise the reality is they have not chosen to do so.
2
ApyanApr 7, 2026
+2
It's like seeing two spoiled kids trying to look cool.
2
csmflynt3Apr 7, 2026
+2
The propaganda coming out of Iranian media is almost as ridiculous as CNN .... It's comical to a sane person
2
sacklunchbabyApr 7, 2026
+2
This was a SAR mission. They flew in 2x 130s with 2x little birds inside. The 130s got stuck and the little birds do not have the range to get outa there. They brought in a few different planes that did not get stuck and then blew up all the stuck shit as they were leaving.
2
IntelArtiGenApr 6, 2026
+11
I do not trust the US with all the details of the operation but I'll clearly also not trust Iran for that. I guess it might be hard to have the complete truth quickly. Iran probably doesn't know much, and even the CIA admitted they used a deception campaign during the rescue. So if we think we clearly know what happened, well we might be wrong.
11
traplords8nApr 6, 2026
+13
War is always deception. I wouldn't be surprised if the US military asked Trump to say ridiculous things and play into it tbh. If all those generals come back I would be like "ope, yep they were tricking Iran"
Not that I think that's likely or anything, and I'm definitely not trying to speak highly of trumps competence, it's just that anything can be a deception or bluff when it comes to war.
13
ChiefStrongbonesApr 6, 2026
+3
Did Trump take control over Iran's twitter account and start shitposting?
3
Nd343343Apr 6, 2026
+3
Forgive my ignorance, but have they previously admitted to possession enriched uranium prior to this?
3
Jsr1Apr 6, 2026
+8
So you do have enriched uranium……
8
tauberculosisApr 6, 2026
Yep, this was always a well known fact and common knowledge. It’s just not enriched enough for nuclear weapons. It was agreed upon that it wouldn’t be enriched more than ~60% for energy needs.
0
ShamanSix01Apr 6, 2026
+4
And there lies the rub with nuclear energy.
4
FreedomPlus9756Apr 6, 2026
+5
Let's be honest. Both sides of this war are extremely untrustworthy at this point
5
PrineakApr 6, 2026
+6
So Iran admits to having enriched uranium?
6
nullbyte420Apr 6, 2026
+8
That's no secret? They had IAEA inspections too, until they didn't like that anymore
8
ShutterPriorityApr 6, 2026
+5
"The wreckage of an American aircraft and a helicopter rotor is seen in Isfahan, Iran, April 5, 2026. (Reuters Photo)"
Mmmm... Excellent caption boys! That's a set of C-130 nacelles. No helicopter rotor in sight -- unless we suddenly sent some never-before-seen super-secret-squirrel 6-bladed Osprey's out there.
That's probably indicative of the quality of their reporting to apply to the rest of this article.
5
fury420Apr 6, 2026
+3
The other photos of that debris field do show helicopter rotors too, I think the caption may have been shared among them?
And they happened to have six bladed rotors as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD_Helicopters_MH-6_Little_Bird
https://www.twz.com/air/night-stalker-little-bird-helicopters-destroyed-at-forward-landing-site-in-iran
3
hbtljose13Apr 6, 2026
+2
I wouldn’t put it pass the current administration to let American pilots in situations even if there’s a chance of getting shot down knowing special forces can get live training on quick, effective extractions for an eventual operation against enemy targets . They need good PR for future missions involving boots on the ground.
2
kilobitchApr 6, 2026
+2
Nothing wrong with stealing enriched uranium from a terrorist state.
2
SLR107FR-31Apr 6, 2026
+4
Sooooo that whole "We aren't enriching uranium" thing was bullshit then?
4
Wicked_BlackApr 6, 2026
+2
They’ve already admitted to it
2
44Stryker44Apr 6, 2026
+2
If that were the case, they would have succeeded
2
TwodogsonecouchApr 6, 2026
+2
Ummm trust me if it was it wouldnt be secret trump couldnt shit himself up.
Now since you suggested it hes gonna say it was
Edit: hahahahahahaha the typo was accidental but im leaving it.
2
Captain_WagApr 6, 2026
+2
Yes that's what any smart individual would do. Put enriched uranium on a chopper and fly it through a war zone. What could possibly go wrong. That chopper can definitely haul a good amount of uranium with the small caliber armaments it has on board.
2
Affectionate_Bee6434Apr 6, 2026
+3
What might support their claim is that the farp was set up very close to Isfahan which is an IRGC strong hold, a very strategic city but again the operations to steal enriched uranium is a fairy tale dream. The uranium is located deep underground and is guarded by the most elite soldiers they have. The second CSAR round was always going to be extremely challenging and they probably thought a small scale one had a high chance of failure. They probably flew small helicopters inside cargo planes inside Iran and then did the rescue through that.
3
Professional-Ad3874Apr 6, 2026
+4
Its a PR statement by Iran since they failed to capture the pilot. Like US troops were going to carry it all out by hand?
Also, not to pick a fight but no one puts "their most elite" soldiers underground guarding something no foot soldiers are likely to ever reach. What a waste that would be. We can save that for the scripts for whatever movies are made about this.
4
AlaskaStilettoApr 6, 2026
+3
This theory is everywhere. Everywhere across social media. No one trusts anything coming out of Trump’s White House.
3
platoface541Apr 6, 2026
+1
This is the first I’ve seen of them confirming they have enriched uranium….
1
fury420Apr 6, 2026
+9
Then you haven't been paying attention, Iran has literally have shown IAEA inspectors their stockpiles of 60% enriched, it's detailed in their reports.
9
FiftyLoudCatsApr 6, 2026
+3
This is just non-sensical Iranian propaganda to save face since they couldn’t find either pilot.
Nevertheless, useful idiots of the west and social media will run with it.
I have grown a strong resentment to this website but here I am…
199 Comments