· 160 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 23, 2026 at 7:29 PM

Iran deploys more mines in the Strait of Hormuz, sources say

Posted by Yujin-Ha



🚩 Report this post

160 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
thewolfshead 2 days ago +935
More mines? After I specifically asked you not to?
935
nakedalienmonkey 2 days ago +196
It's comedy at this point 😂 except countries and lives will be harmed
196
Youre-doin-great 2 days ago +63
It’s sad that as an American I find this extremely funny. Weird times we live in
63
Anonymous_Quark 1 day ago +33
Funny until it starts REALLY impacting more than oil.
33
Youre-doin-great 1 day ago +21
Brought it on ourselves for thinking we can bully the world. Besides f*** oil I care more about the people that will die
21
ErgoMachina 1 day ago +34
This is the part that Americans really don't understand yet. You didn't brought it on yourselves, but the whole f****** planet...
34
IrishSnow23 1 day ago +10
I think plenty do...and it's to the point where we almost hope the world kicks us to the curb and doesn't enable us. Some of us are horrified and know that we haven't felt the pain yet and that the whole world is in crisis because of the criminal in command. The MAGA party all needs to go.
10
nakedalienmonkey 1 day ago +6
Yes it's going to be a global oil crisis that the US directly caused...
6
Antique-Special8025 1 day ago +7
>Brought it on ourselves for thinking we can bully the world. Don't sell yourself short, you brought it on the entire world. All across the world people are going die due to things like the coming food prices spikes, you guys are responsible for that.
7
mixreality 1 day ago +1
I'm ready for shortages, it needs to impact people here.
1
rose_gold_glitter 1 day ago +2
food shortages?
2
NixarDixar 1 day ago +2
Especially those, without them not enough of us die and we wont start eating prime ministers and presidents as we shohld have started doing about 100 years ago
2
G_Morgan 1 day ago +2
Trump will just baby rage some more and then Iran will put more mines in.
2
Boiler_bro3 1 day ago +43
Maybe they thought the USA was saying, “No. More mines.”?
43
OneBillPhil 1 day ago +27
Open the strait *?* No *,* more mines *!*
27
foolmetwiceagain 1 day ago +3
This joke is so timeless and flexible. I’m curious if the Simpsons writers actually encountered this in the wild, or how else they dreamed up this scenario.
3
CaptainCanuck93 1 day ago +2
~~Chinese~~ American final warning
2
totalwarwiser 1 day ago +11
I think by now Iran simply decided to do his own thing and think that the US is just a nuisance.
11
bigredthesnorer 1 day ago +3
Trump reminds me of the seagulls in Finding Nemo. Mine, mine, mine, mine.
3
Caffdy 1 day ago +5
Bank of America never told me about this!
5
Raspberries-Are-Evil 1 day ago +268
Trump sent the US minesweepers to Asia before the war he started. F****** moron.
268
LangyMD 1 day ago +78
He also sent them to the shipbreakers back in January.
78
DummyDumDragon 1 day ago +45
It's almost as if he doesn't actually wanna win this war he started so he has an excuse to not let you all vote come November....
45
lazergator 1 day ago +11
Oh that’s absolutely the plan. I’m just wondering when the ball will drop
11
Agreeable-Spot-7376 1 day ago +5
A year ago.
5
Roid-a-holic_ReX 1 day ago +7
He really needs an attack on American soil for that to be palatable at all to the American people. I pray it doesn’t happen but I’m not confident it won’t.
7
Slavik81 1 day ago +3
There were elections in 1862 and 1864 during the US Civil War. That was a war on US soil in which 3% of the population was injured or killed. There's no excuse for not having them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1862_United_States_elections https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1864_United_States_elections
3
DexJedi 1 day ago +5
I suspect this is more a matter of Hanlon Razor (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity). You are giving him to much credit otherwise. Not saying he does not do things to profit though. He clearly does.
5
DummyDumDragon 1 day ago +1
Perhaps. But I'm giving *him* the credit, rather the ones whonare likely pulling his strings
1
DexJedi 1 day ago +2
I'm not to sure anyone really has control over Trump. Some might steer him one way, others the other way. Some certainly have a bigger influence than others. But the whole "puppet" theory does not align with the messy ordeal of his administration if you ask me. Which would steer me towards the "Occam’s Razor" in this matter.
2
vu2tve 1 day ago +1
Last I checked, Iran, GCC, and the Strait of Hormuz are \*in\* Asia, specifically, western Asia.
1
Ready_Data5206 2 days ago +665
America and Israel have won this war at least three or five times already. I cannot handle all this winning anymore.
665
Bored2001 2 days ago +149
Guess trump was right, we'd get tired of 'winning'
149
feral0101 2 days ago +91
In defence of Israel, everyone knows that they want to make Iran a failed state and have been calling for a full blown invasion. They have 0 humanitarian concern. They have consistently derailed and pressured the US away from diplomacy. It’s just the US that looks stupid.
91
oskich 1 day ago +36
So, how many Israeli troops are going to participate in that invasion?
36
afreshstart2015 1 day ago +44
isnt that what american troops are for? :/ so glad keir starmer has decided not to send british forces to join in on this
44
feral0101 1 day ago +15
0, Israelis don’t want to watch IDF vs FPV drone compilations on their social media feed
15
Potential_Archer2427 1 day ago +3
Hezbollah already put many videos of FPV drones vs the IDF
3
Sieve-Boy 1 day ago +4
And the Iranian Army and IRGC ground forces who have been preparing for this for 47 years.
4
Traditional-Fox-1597 1 day ago +14
Starting your point with "In defence of Israel" was certainly a choice.
14
feral0101 1 day ago +8
Did make me feel a bit sick, but Israelis have been quite transparent with their malice
8
EnvironmentalToe4055 1 day ago +2
Writing it like that confuses the ESL shills hired out of South Asia
2
Sticklefront 1 day ago
Specifically, Israel has been calling for someone else to invade Iran for them.
0
calstanfordboye 1 day ago +1
Yes because a failed state is such a safe thing to have in your neighbourhood
1
I_Roll_Chicago 1 day ago
They’re calling for invasion but ruled out their own troops participating. You cant make this shit up.
0
toggiz_the_elder 1 day ago
Hey, it also keeps Bibi’s corruption trial on hold a bit longer.
0
FinndBors 1 day ago +11
“Please, please. It’s too much winning. We can’t take it anymore, Mr. President, it’s too much” I hate this timeline.
11
Constant_Section1491 1 day ago +4
And from yesterday's tweet: "As everyone knows, I am an extraordinarily brilliant person".
4
sylekta 1 day ago +1
stat padding at this point gotta pump those war victory numbers up
1
Tzilung 1 day ago +1
Tbf, that was true of the Vietnam war as well. Win every battle but lose the war is USA's thing. Iran is used to being downtrodden and stomped on. They just have to not lose, and that's Iran's specialty. 
1
AnomalyNexus 1 day ago +41
This is gonna drag all the way into 2027 isn't it...
41
3_Thumbs_Up 1 day ago +37
That's a very optimistic take.
37
hanr86 1 day ago +6
The market now runs on Trump headlines and fakeouts between good and bad news to mess with dumb money. They'll do a good job sucking every last drop.
6
Commercial-Co 1 day ago +1
To 2028.
1
Ricklames 2 days ago +202
The only positive from this disaster is it will likely f*** the maga morons in the midterms
202
PrivatePilot9 1 day ago +168
It’s also f****** lots of peoples lives who don’t even live in the USA or wanted anything to do with this bullshit.
168
smltor 1 day ago +57
I mean if they think it is f****** with their lives now after just an oil shortage wait til the fertiliser kicks in. Oil you can kind of fix up in a few days or weeks. Plants on the other hand are obnoxious in their "No I will only grow during this season". Like f****** teenagers they are. No fertiliser for growing season is a "oh well hopefully we have it for next year" type of problem. I should probably invest in eggs or something ahahahaha
57
Nolenag 1 day ago +23
>I mean if they think it is f****** with their lives now after just an oil shortage wait til the fertiliser kicks in. ... What's your point? It's still entirely the fault of the USA regardless.
23
PrivatePilot9 1 day ago +5
I don’t forget Israel is on on this nonsense too.
5
Nolenag 1 day ago +3
Israel wouldn't have been able to do this without the US though.
3
ChaseballBat 1 day ago +5
Not for lack of desire.
5
banned-from-rbooks 1 day ago +1
You can buy corn futures, literally.
1
Just_Learned_This 1 day ago +1
Hold them until delivery. For the experience.
1
Curiousinuae 1 day ago +7
This is just the exact problem in the world. Every thing that happens, people are able to think how it impacts the US. War killed 13 us soldiers..what about numerous others who aren’t even living in those 3 countries, but just here making a loving wage?
7
Yujin-Ha 2 days ago +94
It 100% will. The U.S. public is really only in-tune with cost of living.
94
Ricklames 1 day ago +37
Yep, (anecdotally) most folks I deal with are not reading multiple news sources and aren’t using Listnook to have debate on these issues. What affects most Americans is cost of items, specifically fuel (because most people drive) and groceries (everyone has to eat). The maga promise was lower cost of living and no new “dumb” wars. They have violated both, and I think they will pay and put the ball in the Dem’s court. I’m carefully optimistic the they will take advantage to get the US back on course.
37
Kim_Jong_Unko 1 day ago +14
> I’m carefully optimistic the they will take advantage to get the US back on course. OR! They could spend the next few years in-fighting about stupid bullshit while ignoring all the real issues!
14
AssassinAragorn 1 day ago +5
This is exactly what I was thinking after the election. Republicans won on lowering prices and affordability. But now they own it, and there will be hell to pay if they don't actually make it better. And then of course Trump makes it worse, so. The average American is going to see that they're not better off from 2 years ago and that will slaughter Republicans
5
AlternativeScratch94 1 day ago +5
Currently the dems are set to win the election by about 6%, which means they would have a small lead in the house and the senate will be pretty 50/50. The US is too partisan for either party to ever win in a landslide anymore. Plenty of people who are currently furious with Trump will still vote R in the mid term because they simply don't want the democrats to win.
5
Commercial-Co 1 day ago +2
Republican voters are bad people
2
Far_Addition1210 1 day ago +20
If the Republicans lose their majority in both houses, wont that mean Trump is a lame duck?
20
Ricklames 1 day ago +26
Basically yes, but he’s also liable to impeachment by the house and senate. Honestly, I’m not very educated on if that puts a pause to his current operations in the Middle East though. My understanding is that it would be much easier to halt his bullshit, but this requires Dems to take action, which doesn’t give me much hope but it’s something. If they win majority and don’t take action, that’s a good sign to abandon ship.
26
VeterinarianLeast154 1 day ago +16
"but he’s also liable to impeachment by the house and senate" No, he's not. Only the House can impeach the president (with a majority) due to "high crimes and misdemeanors" and impeachment itself doesn't do much. Conviction and removal comes from 2/3rds of the Senate, something that has never happened in the US and the dems have no hope of gaining that many seats this year to get 2/3rds. Using the military, even in a deeply unpopular way, is not an impeachable offense, although there's plenty of other actions democrats could point to as high crimes/misdemeanors (maybe bribery or treachery although those are high bars). The president has a lot of leeway on military operations, so even if dems controlled the House (likely) and Senate (majority possible although less likely), there isn't a lot they could do for stopping military action in the Middle East without republicans crossing the aisle. Crossing the aisle might occur since the Iran war is very unpopular, especially with MAGA. Dems taking Congress would do a lot to hamstring Trump, particularly with his tariffs and domestic policies, but less so for military action.
16
SomeBaldDude2013 1 day ago +6
If Trump’s brand becomes toxic enough for Dems to win the Senate (something which was unthinkable two months ago), I think we might actually see a decent number of republicans vote for removal and start distancing themselves HARD away from Trump.  They have only gone along with everything because they’ve needed him to stay in power. If being associated with Trump becomes a political liability, they might decide ditching him is their best chance to attain power in the future. 
6
AlternativeScratch94 1 day ago +3
Trump can not run for reelection ever again so they wont do something as drastic as removing him. They'll just wait for him to go away.
3
FamSimmer 1 day ago +4
I'm betting on the Dems being too cowardly to take action even when they have a majority in both the House and the Senate. Either way, the world is screwed if the pedo-in-charge stays in power for another 3 years.
4
mrnotoriousman 1 day ago +5
He was impeached twice his first term and wasn't removed because it was only the Dems and every R votes against it, what are you even talking about? House members have already floated possible articles for when they get voted back in. Maybe if Americans didnt hand over all three branches of government to the pedo party you'd have a point
5
complex_momentum 1 day ago +1
I hear your frustration but I'd like to point out that 7 republican senators voted to impeach Trump over the coup attempt. Because of our horrifying governmental structure that requires a ridiculous supermajority that wasn't nearly enough, but considering no president has EVER had a senator from their party vote to remove them before (or since) it's actually quite a lot of movement. Naturally all of those senators got booted out of the party / Senate more or less.
1
RapaNow 1 day ago +2
He didn't need congress or senate for tariffs, Venezuela, ICE or Iran.
2
chewie_were_home 1 day ago -1
This time it means removal from office. If he makes it that long.
-1
VeterinarianLeast154 1 day ago +11
No it wouldn't. They would need 2/3rd of the Senate to remove, and the dems have basically no hope of getting 2/3rds of the Senate in Nov. They're gunning for a simple majority. No US president has ever been removed from office, so it would take a lot to get Republicans to go along with it.
11
zokka_son_of_zokka 1 day ago +8
More to the point, it's wrecking the price of gas, which should lead to a push for renewables.
8
Ricklames 1 day ago +6
1000% yes This may have the unintended effect of reducing reliance on fossil fuels, which is a net positive. This isn’t me being happy about a war because I’m absolutely not, but it can affect changes in how the world approaches energy. The major issue is that oil fuels more than just energy; it fuels most goods and the transportation of them on land.
6
Ready_Data5206 1 day ago +2
only if this war and its after-affects last till the midterms. Else Mr Trump can escape the political consequences. He is already placing a puppet on the Central Bank who will flood the economy with artificial money.
2
Ricklames 1 day ago +1
Makes sense, but I don’t see this ending cleanly before September, and at that point, the maga’s cant escape the effects.
1
a_case_of_everything 1 day ago +1
+ oil demand destruction
1
Nessie_of_the_Loch 1 day ago +1
What's hilarious is that losing the elections this fall will likely make their actual lives better - I've never seen a group with greater cognitive dissonance, actively applauding as they lose their rights, healthcare, and benefits.
1
Key_Ant6473 1 day ago +1
And countries steamlining renewable energy.
1
jjax2003 1 day ago +50
Just wait a few more weeks or a month and the global oil crisis is really going to hit the homes of all of us. People won't be able to ignore it and I hope it's enough to pressure the US administration to pull out of Iran.
50
rollem 1 day ago +66
It’s incredibly unfair that it’s hitting Asia and Europe more quickly than the US, which is solely responsible for the mess.
66
itsNikolai11 1 day ago +5
Yeah, i can only hope that i f****** hurts for the morons in the US as well
5
ExpertExpert 1 day ago +6
eh. US is currently using strategic oil reserves to delay it from hitting them. it makes the problem even worse later... it's fine now but oh man it'll be worse
6
I_Roll_Chicago 1 day ago +2
We are extremely low on those reserves and we are getting very close to not having enough to make a difference Our reserves were already at 33% capacity before release
2
KorgothOfBarbaria 1 day ago +1
Any idea what current reserve levels are sitting at?
1
jjax2003 1 day ago +3
By mid May you will see the true prices start (energy) to move in as the paper oil price and real world oil start to converge and that's when all hell breaks loose. Food prices will take a bit longer. Probably late summer.
3
ogreofnorth 1 day ago +9
And guess what. Before Trumps attack, the strait was open, they didn’t have nuclear abilities, they were not charging ships tk move through, gas wasn’t 100+ a barrel and there were no mines in the strait. Congrats the idiot in chief for the US caused this.
9
Glum-Supermarket1274 1 day ago +21
This is locking in the strait shut down for the next year at least. This is IRGC digging in. It takes months to disarm/sweep these mines even if they start today.
21
BloodWorried7446 1 day ago +2
and the sweepers will be sitting ducks. 
2
SawToothKernel 2 days ago +14
"Sources" being Trump broadcasting on social media that they will shoot at all the boats laying mines.
14
ohnohelpwhereamI 1 day ago +5
>Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) navy laid more mines in the Strait of Hormuz this week, according to a U.S. official and a source with knowledge of the issue. Honestly I trust Other Source more then the White House.
5
LilyBelle504 1 day ago +3
I don't know... That's the same guys who said their Supreme leader is perfectly fine, but then hasn't shown his face publicly since.
3
Purple_oyster 1 day ago -3
Yeah I bet at the end of this it will be obvious no mines were deployed
-3
Top-Handle4786 2 days ago +27
You know what the answer to this problem is? Correct! Blockade! We blockade the blockade that was blockading our previous blockade, so that the blockade blockades all blockades forever!
27
iamnotafbiagnt 1 day ago +7
Blockception
7
Kermit_the_hog 1 day ago +3
As the kids would say “blockademaxxing”
3
Ready_Data5206 1 day ago +2
Such genius can only be thought up by MAGA
2
supercali45 2 days ago +24
tick tock .. the longer this drags out the more fucked the Pedo is
24
HungryAddition1 2 days ago +30
Sort of everyone in the world including Iran is too...
30
fec2245 2 days ago
Lots of pedophiles in the IRGC, maybe that's what he meant.
0
Zayaaz 2 days ago +45
i got downvoted yesterday saying iran would do this
45
BOPSurfcasting1 1 day ago +39
Unblock your account so we can see proof of your claim....
39
G00b3rb0y 1 day ago +17
Can you link your comment mate?
17
Aelig_ 1 day ago +1
There is no evidence whatsoever that Iran is doing this. The claim comes from the same people who told us the war was over and Iran has no navy. We are supposed to believe that the US sees this happening and decides to do nothing about it. I guess that's the most believable part of all this, given that the US closed the strait.
1
SouthernRow2710 1 day ago +2
It corroborated w/ the WaPo report today the the Pentagon informed congress it could tak 6 months to clear the strait.
2
BongoHunter 1 day ago
You should get an account on Polymarket! /s
0
0Hakuna_Matata0 1 day ago +3
It’s so absurd you just have to laugh
3
WolfOne 1 day ago +4
can't drones be used for de-mining? i don't really see a drone costing that much more than a mine.
4
rollem 1 day ago +8
They’re extremely hard to find. It’s very much a needle in a haystack problem. Mine clearing is possible and we have lots of capability to do it, but it takes a lot of time. And since Iran is right there they can mine another area as we clear the first.
8
superseven27 1 day ago +3
Sure. Problem ist that it takes time. Half a year are current estimates.
3
Yelworc0242 2 days ago +13
Iran are laying mines in the global economy... We're in for an absolute nightmare soon...
13
Remus88Romulus 1 day ago +10
Thank you USA and Israel for plunging the whole World into a financial crisis like the one we had in 2008, probably even worse...
10
fideliz 1 day ago +7
Caaaan we fix it? No, it's fucked!
7
Opinions_ideas 1 day ago +3
And at same time Trump saying he will not use a nuclear weapon on Iran !
3
Disastrous_Sky_73 1 day ago +4
And he got rid of an admiral and a general within 24hrs… At some point they we find someone to be ok with war crimes, and may even give him the nuke codes…
4
Motor-Region-1011 1 day ago +10
Seams like iran has alot of life and cards to play...unexpected if you listen to orangutan...
10
LilyBelle504 1 day ago +5
Iran's regime\* People in Iran? Still suffering the ongoing crackdown and internet shutdown.
5
Motor-Region-1011 1 day ago +3
They beeen suffering for 50 years...since the revolution...
3
LilyBelle504 1 day ago +2
Yea, it's horrible. I really hope regardless of what silly bickering Trump or the Iranian regime get into, the people in Iran are able to get something out of this positive out of all this- hopefully a change in government and a better, less oppressive life.
2
Motor-Region-1011 1 day ago +1
Nothing will happen unless the do something. This is their last chance. If regime survives this it will only get stronger.
1
LilyBelle504 1 day ago +1
I agree that if the regime manages to survive, things are going to get a lot worse (for Iranians especially). I remember hearing before the war started that Iran's regime was working with outside Chinese tech companies to restructure it's restricted version of the internet it rolls out during crackdowns... Basically make it even more restrictive and spyware-y. We've already seen how damaging it is to the protests when the regime is able to shutoff access to the outside internet for Iranians, as it allows them to brutally crackdown behind a curtain, and leave few witnesses.
1
Far_Car430 1 day ago +2
We are fucked, by Iran and Taco.
2
cybaz 1 day ago +2
They lost the locations of the last batch, so it will take forever to find those, not sure what the purpose of laying more down is.
2
MikeSteamer 1 day ago +2
Don’t worry, Hegseth is on it.
2
BritishAnimator 1 day ago +2
Trump will start laying his own mines to one-up Iran.
2
CatpainLeghatsenia 1 day ago +2
My only hope and maybe silver lining in all these shenanigans, is that now everyone feels the pressure of fossil fuel dependence. Suddenly, those once-frowned-upon green technologies aren’t looking so bad anymore. Maybe, just maybe, this crisis will finally force the change we’ve needed all along.
2
Raaka-Kake 1 day ago +2
I just find it funny Trump promised to fill the US strategic oil reserve, but then didn’t, and left the reserve at 57% before starting a war with Iran.
2
yosisoy 1 day ago +2
Burn them all
2
raerae1991 1 day ago +6
Iran seems to take this war more serious than Trump does…just saying!
6
BOPSurfcasting1 1 day ago +3
Now it doesn't matter if the strait is open, majority of ships can't sail with mines in the water. Iran can say - strait open, now stop blockading our ports. Strait is still too risky for insurance companies, so it has the same effect as Iran closing the strait.
3
Uniumtrium 1 day ago +2
Remove your mines or we won't stop blocking your ports and seizing your ships.
2
BOPSurfcasting1 1 day ago +2
Okay, mines removed. Now stop blocking our ports and seizing our ships. Warning to all ships: Death will come on swift wings to those who try to pass through the strait.
2
WickedFrags 2 days ago +5
"- Mine! No, mine!!!" - Strait of Hormuz, 2026
5
Tight-Guidance-5967 2 days ago +5
lol orange face being played like a fiddle. lol.
5
copperblood 2 days ago +4
Just two more weeks to open the Strait of Hormuz!! F*** details that it was fully open prior to the US and Israel launching their illegal war.
4
wouter135 1 day ago +2
Iran thinks: The Strait is mine
2
spektre 1 day ago +2
But Trump said Iran is helping him remove the mines. Is he confusing minesweepers with minelayers?
2
quick_justice 1 day ago +2
Oh, country uses its strategic advantage to its benefit when invaded?? Unheard of!
2
mvw2 1 day ago +1
Trump today: " We have today control of the Straight. " Iran today: "But what about these mines?"
1
EmotionalBag777 1 day ago +1
I thought we were out sweeping
1
VividLifeToday 1 day ago +1
Degauss the ships and sail right through
1
thesword62 1 day ago +1
2 weeks
1
Iceman_B 1 day ago +1
Can anyone verify this? Or are mines the new "WMD" now?
1
ConsistentAsparagus 1 day ago +1
No!\ More mines
1
Longjumping-Log1591 1 day ago +1
He no Shoot to Kill ,, why he no Shoot to kill?, He say Shoot to kill but he no Shoot to kill
1
orangebluegreen123 1 day ago +1
I’m not going to drop a nuke. Why would I do that? They are completely destroyed. If I was betting man and there was an opportunity to bet if Trump is going to nuke someone, I’d put money on it.
1
MAVERICK910 2 days ago +1
"you have the watches, we have the time" Iran is going to squeeze Trump and they have the perfect lever.
1
didnt-ask-but-ok 1 day ago +1
Ahh if a lying POS says it true it must be true. Just like that orange turd dipshit in the White House
1
tranquilrage73 1 day ago +3
The orange turd in the White House admitted it.
3
bigredthesnorer 1 day ago +1
Using all their ships at the bottom of the sea?
1
Potential_Archer2427 1 day ago +1
With fishing boats, they don't need naval ships to put mines
1
← Back to Board