More mines? After I specifically asked you not to?
935
nakedalienmonkeyApr 23, 2026
+196
It's comedy at this point 😂 except countries and lives will be harmed
196
Youre-doin-greatApr 23, 2026
+63
It’s sad that as an American I find this extremely funny. Weird times we live in
63
Anonymous_QuarkApr 23, 2026
+33
Funny until it starts REALLY impacting more than oil.
33
Youre-doin-greatApr 24, 2026
+21
Brought it on ourselves for thinking we can bully the world. Besides f*** oil I care more about the people that will die
21
ErgoMachinaApr 24, 2026
+34
This is the part that Americans really don't understand yet. You didn't brought it on yourselves, but the whole f****** planet...
34
IrishSnow23Apr 24, 2026
+10
I think plenty do...and it's to the point where we almost hope the world kicks us to the curb and doesn't enable us. Some of us are horrified and know that we haven't felt the pain yet and that the whole world is in crisis because of the criminal in command. The MAGA party all needs to go.
10
nakedalienmonkeyApr 24, 2026
+6
Yes it's going to be a global oil crisis that the US directly caused...
6
Antique-Special8025Apr 24, 2026
+7
>Brought it on ourselves for thinking we can bully the world.
Don't sell yourself short, you brought it on the entire world. All across the world people are going die due to things like the coming food prices spikes, you guys are responsible for that.
7
mixrealityApr 24, 2026
+1
I'm ready for shortages, it needs to impact people here.
1
rose_gold_glitterApr 24, 2026
+2
food shortages?
2
NixarDixarApr 24, 2026
+2
Especially those, without them not enough of us die and we wont start eating prime ministers and presidents as we shohld have started doing about 100 years ago
2
G_MorganApr 24, 2026
+2
Trump will just baby rage some more and then Iran will put more mines in.
2
Boiler_bro3Apr 23, 2026
+43
Maybe they thought the USA was saying, “No. More mines.”?
43
OneBillPhilApr 24, 2026
+27
Open the strait *?* No *,* more mines *!*
27
foolmetwiceagainApr 24, 2026
+3
This joke is so timeless and flexible. I’m curious if the Simpsons writers actually encountered this in the wild, or how else they dreamed up this scenario.
3
CaptainCanuck93Apr 24, 2026
+2
~~Chinese~~ American final warning
2
totalwarwiserApr 23, 2026
+11
I think by now Iran simply decided to do his own thing and think that the US is just a nuisance.
11
bigredthesnorerApr 24, 2026
+3
Trump reminds me of the seagulls in Finding Nemo. Mine, mine, mine, mine.
3
CaffdyApr 23, 2026
+5
Bank of America never told me about this!
5
Raspberries-Are-EvilApr 23, 2026
+268
Trump sent the US minesweepers to Asia before the war he started. F****** moron.
268
LangyMDApr 23, 2026
+78
He also sent them to the shipbreakers back in January.
78
DummyDumDragonApr 23, 2026
+45
It's almost as if he doesn't actually wanna win this war he started so he has an excuse to not let you all vote come November....
45
lazergatorApr 24, 2026
+11
Oh that’s absolutely the plan. I’m just wondering when the ball will drop
11
Agreeable-Spot-7376Apr 24, 2026
+5
A year ago.
5
Roid-a-holic_ReXApr 24, 2026
+7
He really needs an attack on American soil for that to be palatable at all to the American people. I pray it doesn’t happen but I’m not confident it won’t.
7
Slavik81Apr 24, 2026
+3
There were elections in 1862 and 1864 during the US Civil War. That was a war on US soil in which 3% of the population was injured or killed. There's no excuse for not having them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1862_United_States_elections
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1864_United_States_elections
3
DexJediApr 24, 2026
+5
I suspect this is more a matter of Hanlon Razor (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity).
You are giving him to much credit otherwise.
Not saying he does not do things to profit though. He clearly does.
5
DummyDumDragonApr 24, 2026
+1
Perhaps. But I'm giving *him* the credit, rather the ones whonare likely pulling his strings
1
DexJediApr 24, 2026
+2
I'm not to sure anyone really has control over Trump. Some might steer him one way, others the other way. Some certainly have a bigger influence than others. But the whole "puppet" theory does not align with the messy ordeal of his administration if you ask me. Which would steer me towards the "Occam’s Razor" in this matter.
2
vu2tveApr 24, 2026
+1
Last I checked, Iran, GCC, and the Strait of Hormuz are \*in\* Asia, specifically, western Asia.
1
Ready_Data5206Apr 23, 2026
+665
America and Israel have won this war at least three or five times already. I cannot handle all this winning anymore.
665
Bored2001Apr 23, 2026
+149
Guess trump was right, we'd get tired of 'winning'
149
feral0101Apr 23, 2026
+91
In defence of Israel, everyone knows that they want to make Iran a failed state and have been calling for a full blown invasion. They have 0 humanitarian concern. They have consistently derailed and pressured the US away from diplomacy.
It’s just the US that looks stupid.
91
oskichApr 23, 2026
+36
So, how many Israeli troops are going to participate in that invasion?
36
afreshstart2015Apr 23, 2026
+44
isnt that what american troops are for? :/
so glad keir starmer has decided not to send british forces to join in on this
44
feral0101Apr 23, 2026
+15
0, Israelis don’t want to watch IDF vs FPV drone compilations on their social media feed
15
Potential_Archer2427Apr 24, 2026
+3
Hezbollah already put many videos of FPV drones vs the IDF
3
Sieve-BoyApr 23, 2026
+4
And the Iranian Army and IRGC ground forces who have been preparing for this for 47 years.
4
Traditional-Fox-1597Apr 23, 2026
+14
Starting your point with "In defence of Israel" was certainly a choice.
14
feral0101Apr 23, 2026
+8
Did make me feel a bit sick, but Israelis have been quite transparent with their malice
8
EnvironmentalToe4055Apr 24, 2026
+2
Writing it like that confuses the ESL shills hired out of South Asia
2
SticklefrontApr 23, 2026
Specifically, Israel has been calling for someone else to invade Iran for them.
0
calstanfordboyeApr 24, 2026
+1
Yes because a failed state is such a safe thing to have in your neighbourhood
1
I_Roll_ChicagoApr 24, 2026
They’re calling for invasion but ruled out their own troops participating. You cant make this shit up.
0
toggiz_the_elderApr 23, 2026
Hey, it also keeps Bibi’s corruption trial on hold a bit longer.
0
FinndBorsApr 23, 2026
+11
“Please, please. It’s too much winning. We can’t take it anymore, Mr. President, it’s too much”
I hate this timeline.
11
Constant_Section1491Apr 23, 2026
+4
And from yesterday's tweet:
"As everyone knows, I am an extraordinarily brilliant person".
4
sylektaApr 23, 2026
+1
stat padding at this point gotta pump those war victory numbers up
1
TzilungApr 24, 2026
+1
Tbf, that was true of the Vietnam war as well. Win every battle but lose the war is USA's thing. Iran is used to being downtrodden and stomped on. They just have to not lose, and that's Iran's specialty.
1
AnomalyNexusApr 23, 2026
+41
This is gonna drag all the way into 2027 isn't it...
41
3_Thumbs_UpApr 24, 2026
+37
That's a very optimistic take.
37
hanr86Apr 24, 2026
+6
The market now runs on Trump headlines and fakeouts between good and bad news to mess with dumb money. They'll do a good job sucking every last drop.
6
Commercial-CoApr 24, 2026
+1
To 2028.
1
RicklamesApr 23, 2026
+202
The only positive from this disaster is it will likely f*** the maga morons in the midterms
202
PrivatePilot9Apr 23, 2026
+168
It’s also f****** lots of peoples lives who don’t even live in the USA or wanted anything to do with this bullshit.
168
smltorApr 23, 2026
+57
I mean if they think it is f****** with their lives now after just an oil shortage wait til the fertiliser kicks in.
Oil you can kind of fix up in a few days or weeks. Plants on the other hand are obnoxious in their "No I will only grow during this season". Like f****** teenagers they are.
No fertiliser for growing season is a "oh well hopefully we have it for next year" type of problem.
I should probably invest in eggs or something ahahahaha
57
NolenagApr 23, 2026
+23
>I mean if they think it is f****** with their lives now after just an oil shortage wait til the fertiliser kicks in.
...
What's your point? It's still entirely the fault of the USA regardless.
23
PrivatePilot9Apr 23, 2026
+5
I don’t forget Israel is on on this nonsense too.
5
NolenagApr 23, 2026
+3
Israel wouldn't have been able to do this without the US though.
3
ChaseballBatApr 24, 2026
+5
Not for lack of desire.
5
banned-from-rbooksApr 24, 2026
+1
You can buy corn futures, literally.
1
Just_Learned_ThisApr 24, 2026
+1
Hold them until delivery. For the experience.
1
CuriousinuaeApr 24, 2026
+7
This is just the exact problem in the world. Every thing that happens, people are able to think how it impacts the US. War killed 13 us soldiers..what about numerous others who aren’t even living in those 3 countries, but just here making a loving wage?
7
Yujin-HaApr 23, 2026
+94
It 100% will. The U.S. public is really only in-tune with cost of living.
94
RicklamesApr 23, 2026
+37
Yep, (anecdotally) most folks I deal with are not reading multiple news sources and aren’t using Listnook to have debate on these issues.
What affects most Americans is cost of items, specifically fuel (because most people drive) and groceries (everyone has to eat). The maga promise was lower cost of living and no new “dumb” wars. They have violated both, and I think they will pay and put the ball in the Dem’s court. I’m carefully optimistic the they will take advantage to get the US back on course.
37
Kim_Jong_UnkoApr 24, 2026
+14
> I’m carefully optimistic the they will take advantage to get the US back on course.
OR! They could spend the next few years in-fighting about stupid bullshit while ignoring all the real issues!
14
AssassinAragornApr 24, 2026
+5
This is exactly what I was thinking after the election. Republicans won on lowering prices and affordability. But now they own it, and there will be hell to pay if they don't actually make it better.
And then of course Trump makes it worse, so. The average American is going to see that they're not better off from 2 years ago and that will slaughter Republicans
5
AlternativeScratch94Apr 24, 2026
+5
Currently the dems are set to win the election by about 6%, which means they would have a small lead in the house and the senate will be pretty 50/50. The US is too partisan for either party to ever win in a landslide anymore. Plenty of people who are currently furious with Trump will still vote R in the mid term because they simply don't want the democrats to win.
5
Commercial-CoApr 24, 2026
+2
Republican voters are bad people
2
Far_Addition1210Apr 23, 2026
+20
If the Republicans lose their majority in both houses, wont that mean Trump is a lame duck?
20
RicklamesApr 23, 2026
+26
Basically yes, but he’s also liable to impeachment by the house and senate. Honestly, I’m not very educated on if that puts a pause to his current operations in the Middle East though.
My understanding is that it would be much easier to halt his bullshit, but this requires Dems to take action, which doesn’t give me much hope but it’s something. If they win majority and don’t take action, that’s a good sign to abandon ship.
26
VeterinarianLeast154Apr 23, 2026
+16
"but he’s also liable to impeachment by the house and senate" No, he's not. Only the House can impeach the president (with a majority) due to "high crimes and misdemeanors" and impeachment itself doesn't do much. Conviction and removal comes from 2/3rds of the Senate, something that has never happened in the US and the dems have no hope of gaining that many seats this year to get 2/3rds. Using the military, even in a deeply unpopular way, is not an impeachable offense, although there's plenty of other actions democrats could point to as high crimes/misdemeanors (maybe bribery or treachery although those are high bars).
The president has a lot of leeway on military operations, so even if dems controlled the House (likely) and Senate (majority possible although less likely), there isn't a lot they could do for stopping military action in the Middle East without republicans crossing the aisle. Crossing the aisle might occur since the Iran war is very unpopular, especially with MAGA.
Dems taking Congress would do a lot to hamstring Trump, particularly with his tariffs and domestic policies, but less so for military action.
16
SomeBaldDude2013Apr 23, 2026
+6
If Trump’s brand becomes toxic enough for Dems to win the Senate (something which was unthinkable two months ago), I think we might actually see a decent number of republicans vote for removal and start distancing themselves HARD away from Trump.
They have only gone along with everything because they’ve needed him to stay in power. If being associated with Trump becomes a political liability, they might decide ditching him is their best chance to attain power in the future.
6
AlternativeScratch94Apr 24, 2026
+3
Trump can not run for reelection ever again so they wont do something as drastic as removing him. They'll just wait for him to go away.
3
FamSimmerApr 23, 2026
+4
I'm betting on the Dems being too cowardly to take action even when they have a majority in both the House and the Senate. Either way, the world is screwed if the pedo-in-charge stays in power for another 3 years.
4
mrnotoriousmanApr 23, 2026
+5
He was impeached twice his first term and wasn't removed because it was only the Dems and every R votes against it, what are you even talking about? House members have already floated possible articles for when they get voted back in. Maybe if Americans didnt hand over all three branches of government to the pedo party you'd have a point
5
complex_momentumApr 24, 2026
+1
I hear your frustration but I'd like to point out that 7 republican senators voted to impeach Trump over the coup attempt. Because of our horrifying governmental structure that requires a ridiculous supermajority that wasn't nearly enough, but considering no president has EVER had a senator from their party vote to remove them before (or since) it's actually quite a lot of movement. Naturally all of those senators got booted out of the party / Senate more or less.
1
RapaNowApr 24, 2026
+2
He didn't need congress or senate for tariffs, Venezuela, ICE or Iran.
2
chewie_were_homeApr 23, 2026
-1
This time it means removal from office. If he makes it that long.
-1
VeterinarianLeast154Apr 23, 2026
+11
No it wouldn't. They would need 2/3rd of the Senate to remove, and the dems have basically no hope of getting 2/3rds of the Senate in Nov. They're gunning for a simple majority. No US president has ever been removed from office, so it would take a lot to get Republicans to go along with it.
11
zokka_son_of_zokkaApr 23, 2026
+8
More to the point, it's wrecking the price of gas, which should lead to a push for renewables.
8
RicklamesApr 23, 2026
+6
1000% yes
This may have the unintended effect of reducing reliance on fossil fuels, which is a net positive.
This isn’t me being happy about a war because I’m absolutely not, but it can affect changes in how the world approaches energy. The major issue is that oil fuels more than just energy; it fuels most goods and the transportation of them on land.
6
Ready_Data5206Apr 23, 2026
+2
only if this war and its after-affects last till the midterms. Else Mr Trump can escape the political consequences. He is already placing a puppet on the Central Bank who will flood the economy with artificial money.
2
RicklamesApr 23, 2026
+1
Makes sense, but I don’t see this ending cleanly before September, and at that point, the maga’s cant escape the effects.
1
a_case_of_everythingApr 23, 2026
+1
+ oil demand destruction
1
Nessie_of_the_LochApr 24, 2026
+1
What's hilarious is that losing the elections this fall will likely make their actual lives better - I've never seen a group with greater cognitive dissonance, actively applauding as they lose their rights, healthcare, and benefits.
1
Key_Ant6473Apr 24, 2026
+1
And countries steamlining renewable energy.
1
jjax2003Apr 23, 2026
+50
Just wait a few more weeks or a month and the global oil crisis is really going to hit the homes of all of us.
People won't be able to ignore it and I hope it's enough to pressure the US administration to pull out of Iran.
50
rollemApr 23, 2026
+66
It’s incredibly unfair that it’s hitting Asia and Europe more quickly than the US, which is solely responsible for the mess.
66
itsNikolai11Apr 24, 2026
+5
Yeah, i can only hope that i f****** hurts for the morons in the US as well
5
ExpertExpertApr 23, 2026
+6
eh. US is currently using strategic oil reserves to delay it from hitting them. it makes the problem even worse later... it's fine now but oh man it'll be worse
6
I_Roll_ChicagoApr 24, 2026
+2
We are extremely low on those reserves and we are getting very close to not having enough to make a difference
Our reserves were already at 33% capacity before release
2
KorgothOfBarbariaApr 24, 2026
+1
Any idea what current reserve levels are sitting at?
1
jjax2003Apr 24, 2026
+3
By mid May you will see the true prices start (energy) to move in as the paper oil price and real world oil start to converge and that's when all hell breaks loose. Food prices will take a bit longer. Probably late summer.
3
ogreofnorthApr 24, 2026
+9
And guess what. Before Trumps attack, the strait was open, they didn’t have nuclear abilities, they were not charging ships tk move through, gas wasn’t 100+ a barrel and there were no mines in the strait. Congrats the idiot in chief for the US caused this.
9
Glum-Supermarket1274Apr 23, 2026
+21
This is locking in the strait shut down for the next year at least. This is IRGC digging in. It takes months to disarm/sweep these mines even if they start today.
21
BloodWorried7446Apr 24, 2026
+2
and the sweepers will be sitting ducks.
2
SawToothKernelApr 23, 2026
+14
"Sources" being Trump broadcasting on social media that they will shoot at all the boats laying mines.
14
ohnohelpwhereamIApr 23, 2026
+5
>Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) navy laid more mines in the Strait of Hormuz this week, according to a U.S. official and a source with knowledge of the issue.
Honestly I trust Other Source more then the White House.
5
LilyBelle504Apr 24, 2026
+3
I don't know... That's the same guys who said their Supreme leader is perfectly fine, but then hasn't shown his face publicly since.
3
Purple_oysterApr 23, 2026
-3
Yeah I bet at the end of this it will be obvious no mines were deployed
-3
Top-Handle4786Apr 23, 2026
+27
You know what the answer to this problem is?
Correct! Blockade! We blockade the blockade that was blockading our previous blockade, so that the blockade blockades all blockades forever!
27
iamnotafbiagntApr 23, 2026
+7
Blockception
7
Kermit_the_hogApr 23, 2026
+3
As the kids would say “blockademaxxing”
3
Ready_Data5206Apr 23, 2026
+2
Such genius can only be thought up by MAGA
2
supercali45Apr 23, 2026
+24
tick tock .. the longer this drags out the more fucked the Pedo is
24
HungryAddition1Apr 23, 2026
+30
Sort of everyone in the world including Iran is too...
30
fec2245Apr 23, 2026
Lots of pedophiles in the IRGC, maybe that's what he meant.
0
ZayaazApr 23, 2026
+45
i got downvoted yesterday saying iran would do this
45
BOPSurfcasting1Apr 23, 2026
+39
Unblock your account so we can see proof of your claim....
39
G00b3rb0yApr 23, 2026
+17
Can you link your comment mate?
17
Aelig_Apr 23, 2026
+1
There is no evidence whatsoever that Iran is doing this.
The claim comes from the same people who told us the war was over and Iran has no navy.
We are supposed to believe that the US sees this happening and decides to do nothing about it. I guess that's the most believable part of all this, given that the US closed the strait.
1
SouthernRow2710Apr 24, 2026
+2
It corroborated w/ the WaPo report today the the Pentagon informed congress it could tak 6 months to clear the strait.
2
BongoHunterApr 23, 2026
You should get an account on Polymarket! /s
0
0Hakuna_Matata0Apr 23, 2026
+3
It’s so absurd you just have to laugh
3
WolfOneApr 23, 2026
+4
can't drones be used for de-mining? i don't really see a drone costing that much more than a mine.
4
rollemApr 23, 2026
+8
They’re extremely hard to find. It’s very much a needle in a haystack problem. Mine clearing is possible and we have lots of capability to do it, but it takes a lot of time. And since Iran is right there they can mine another area as we clear the first.
8
superseven27Apr 23, 2026
+3
Sure. Problem ist that it takes time. Half a year are current estimates.
3
Yelworc0242Apr 23, 2026
+13
Iran are laying mines in the global economy... We're in for an absolute nightmare soon...
13
Remus88RomulusApr 23, 2026
+10
Thank you USA and Israel for plunging the whole World into a financial crisis like the one we had in 2008, probably even worse...
10
fidelizApr 23, 2026
+7
Caaaan we fix it? No, it's fucked!
7
Opinions_ideasApr 23, 2026
+3
And at same time Trump saying he will not use a nuclear weapon on Iran !
3
Disastrous_Sky_73Apr 23, 2026
+4
And he got rid of an admiral and a general within 24hrs…
At some point they we find someone to be ok with war crimes, and may even give him the nuke codes…
4
Motor-Region-1011Apr 23, 2026
+10
Seams like iran has alot of life and cards to play...unexpected if you listen to orangutan...
10
LilyBelle504Apr 24, 2026
+5
Iran's regime\*
People in Iran? Still suffering the ongoing crackdown and internet shutdown.
5
Motor-Region-1011Apr 24, 2026
+3
They beeen suffering for 50 years...since the revolution...
3
LilyBelle504Apr 24, 2026
+2
Yea, it's horrible.
I really hope regardless of what silly bickering Trump or the Iranian regime get into, the people in Iran are able to get something out of this positive out of all this- hopefully a change in government and a better, less oppressive life.
2
Motor-Region-1011Apr 24, 2026
+1
Nothing will happen unless the do something. This is their last chance. If regime survives this it will only get stronger.
1
LilyBelle504Apr 24, 2026
+1
I agree that if the regime manages to survive, things are going to get a lot worse (for Iranians especially).
I remember hearing before the war started that Iran's regime was working with outside Chinese tech companies to restructure it's restricted version of the internet it rolls out during crackdowns... Basically make it even more restrictive and spyware-y.
We've already seen how damaging it is to the protests when the regime is able to shutoff access to the outside internet for Iranians, as it allows them to brutally crackdown behind a curtain, and leave few witnesses.
1
Far_Car430Apr 23, 2026
+2
We are fucked, by Iran and Taco.
2
cybazApr 24, 2026
+2
They lost the locations of the last batch, so it will take forever to find those, not sure what the purpose of laying more down is.
2
MikeSteamerApr 24, 2026
+2
Don’t worry, Hegseth is on it.
2
BritishAnimatorApr 24, 2026
+2
Trump will start laying his own mines to one-up Iran.
2
CatpainLeghatseniaApr 24, 2026
+2
My only hope and maybe silver lining in all these shenanigans, is that now everyone feels the pressure of fossil fuel dependence. Suddenly, those once-frowned-upon green technologies aren’t looking so bad anymore. Maybe, just maybe, this crisis will finally force the change we’ve needed all along.
2
Raaka-KakeApr 24, 2026
+2
I just find it funny Trump promised to fill the US strategic oil reserve, but then didn’t, and left the reserve at 57% before starting a war with Iran.
2
yosisoyApr 24, 2026
+2
Burn them all
2
raerae1991Apr 23, 2026
+6
Iran seems to take this war more serious than Trump does…just saying!
6
BOPSurfcasting1Apr 23, 2026
+3
Now it doesn't matter if the strait is open, majority of ships can't sail with mines in the water. Iran can say - strait open, now stop blockading our ports. Strait is still too risky for insurance companies, so it has the same effect as Iran closing the strait.
3
UniumtriumApr 24, 2026
+2
Remove your mines or we won't stop blocking your ports and seizing your ships.
2
BOPSurfcasting1Apr 24, 2026
+2
Okay, mines removed. Now stop blocking our ports and seizing our ships.
Warning to all ships: Death will come on swift wings to those who try to pass through the strait.
2
WickedFragsApr 23, 2026
+5
"- Mine!
No, mine!!!" - Strait of Hormuz, 2026
5
Tight-Guidance-5967Apr 23, 2026
+5
lol orange face being played like a fiddle. lol.
5
copperbloodApr 23, 2026
+4
Just two more weeks to open the Strait of Hormuz!! F*** details that it was fully open prior to the US and Israel launching their illegal war.
4
wouter135Apr 23, 2026
+2
Iran thinks: The Strait is mine
2
spektreApr 23, 2026
+2
But Trump said Iran is helping him remove the mines. Is he confusing minesweepers with minelayers?
2
quick_justiceApr 23, 2026
+2
Oh, country uses its strategic advantage to its benefit when invaded??
Unheard of!
2
mvw2Apr 23, 2026
+1
Trump today: " We have today control of the Straight. "
Iran today: "But what about these mines?"
1
EmotionalBag777Apr 23, 2026
+1
I thought we were out sweeping
1
VividLifeTodayApr 23, 2026
+1
Degauss the ships and sail right through
1
thesword62Apr 23, 2026
+1
2 weeks
1
Iceman_BApr 24, 2026
+1
Can anyone verify this? Or are mines the new "WMD" now?
1
ConsistentAsparagusApr 24, 2026
+1
No!\
More mines
1
Longjumping-Log1591Apr 24, 2026
+1
He no Shoot to Kill ,, why he no Shoot to kill?, He say Shoot to kill but he no Shoot to kill
1
orangebluegreen123Apr 24, 2026
+1
I’m not going to drop a nuke. Why would I do that? They are completely destroyed.
If I was betting man and there was an opportunity to bet if Trump is going to nuke someone, I’d put money on it.
1
MAVERICK910Apr 23, 2026
+1
"you have the watches, we have the time"
Iran is going to squeeze Trump and they have the perfect lever.
1
didnt-ask-but-okApr 24, 2026
+1
Ahh if a lying POS says it true it must be true. Just like that orange turd dipshit in the White House
1
tranquilrage73Apr 24, 2026
+3
The orange turd in the White House admitted it.
3
bigredthesnorerApr 24, 2026
+1
Using all their ships at the bottom of the sea?
1
Potential_Archer2427Apr 24, 2026
+1
With fishing boats, they don't need naval ships to put mines
160 Comments