· 52 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 7, 2026 at 12:02 AM

Iran Is Using Alternative Routes To Bypass US Naval Blockade

Posted by BendicantMias


Iran Is Using Alternative Routes To Bypass US Naval Blockade
RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty
Iran Is Using Alternative Routes To Bypass US Naval Blockade
In response to the US naval blockade on Iran’s ports and vessels, Tehran is using alternative routes to transit goods, including through Pakistan, Turkey, and the Caspian Sea.

🚩 Report this post

52 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
itsFelbourne 6 days ago +165
LMAO, land routes aren't some secret ace up their sleeve It would take like 10,000 truckloads to replace a single VLCC tanker delivery, and *exponentially* increase shipping costs. Iran could have been running every tanker truck and train they own at full capacity for the duration of this war and it wouldn't offset losses from US seizures alone, let alone the cost of the blockade
165
FedBathroomInspector 6 days ago +38
You didn’t hear this from me… but they’re about to shock the world with drone tankers. Tie a milk jug to a drone and fly it to its destination.
38
itsFelbourne 6 days ago +45
They could make... TENS of dollars!
45
Mrc3mm3r 6 days ago +11
The evolution of the swallow-coconut migration hypothesis. 
11
DateMasamusubi 6 days ago +3
Countries without access to the sea tend to be poorer after all. Unless you are Switzerland or a microstate in Europe...
3
Fit-Ad-835 6 days ago +2
Not to mention that those roads are already used for other types of exports. You can't export oil non stop on a road and use all of your transportation capacity while ignoring the need for food or other types of important/exports.
2
nsfwuseraccnt 4 days ago +2
That and the US can just bomb the roads and railroads putting a quick end to it if they want. The US purposefully didn't attack Iran's dual use infrastructure...yet. There's a LOT more the US could do to turn up the pressure further.
2
LostInRetransmission 6 days ago +2
It is well known it cannot replace tanker traffic. It is even mentioned in the article. But this can replace the consumer good traffic, which alleviate pressure on the regime of Iran. Seeing how many people posted the "cant replace tanker traffic line" I wonder how many read the article in detail.
2
Amethyst-Flare 5 days ago +1
>routes, trucking goods from neighboring Pakistan and Turkey as well as shipping cargo from Russia, an ally, through the Caspian Sea. Iran is also looking at sending oil by rail to China, a key trading partner. Not going to replace it, no, but that's not nothing, especially through the Caspian.
1
United_Intention_323 6 days ago +42
There is no feasible substitute on this time scale. Their oil exports have been severely curtailed.
42
BendicantMias 6 days ago -3
And yet the chart shown here at 4:45 demonstrates quite vividly that they've dealt with this situation before, and managed to deal with it for a very long time without losing their productive capacity - [https://youtu.be/VPkKJtO7eqU?si=enHcA43YQ5FOmUW5&t=285](https://youtu.be/VPkKJtO7eqU?si=enHcA43YQ5FOmUW5&t=285) Trump himself seems unsatisfied with it already, as he's switched now to trying to unblock the Strait again.
-3
United_Intention_323 6 days ago +6
You’re not refuting what I said.
6
ResponsibleClock9289 6 days ago +31
Pipelines and other land based methods have far less capacity than cargo ships So either way it’s hurting Iran’s oil revenues
31
Several_Ant_9867 6 days ago +9
Pipelines could easily offset naval transport, but they would need to build them first
9
SY0123 6 days ago +4
Their economy has been fucked for years. They are f****** up the rest of the world now.
4
ResponsibleClock9289 6 days ago +10
Yeah but over 50% of the Iranian economy is energy related and their exports have been pinched by the US blockade Other countries have many other options and aren’t as reliant on energy as Iran is, specifically in Asia and Europe where most of Irans exports ended up
10
Odd-Row9485 6 days ago -12
True but Iran doesn’t need to do anything but outlast to win, they’re already used to hardships the question now is who can last the longest in this standoff
-12
FedBathroomInspector 6 days ago +14
Considering most experts think Irans oil infrastructure has about a month before catastrophic failure I think we know the answer.
14
BendicantMias 6 days ago
We DON'T know the answer. The chart shown here at 4:45 demonstrates quite vividly that they've dealt with this situation before, and managed to deal with it for a very long time without losing their productive capacity - [https://youtu.be/VPkKJtO7eqU?si=enHcA43YQ5FOmUW5&t=285](https://youtu.be/VPkKJtO7eqU?si=enHcA43YQ5FOmUW5&t=285)
0
azhillbilly 6 days ago -7
So rest of the world? Cause I don’t think Iran is hurting for oil, it’s all the rest of us.
-7
ResponsibleClock9289 6 days ago +5
Yeah turns out when 50% of your economy is based around the sale of oil, you kinda gotta be able to sell it…
5
azhillbilly 6 days ago +3
And? Iran doesn’t seem to care about how their people live, and their oil sales have been going straight into the government’s pocket. Now all they need to do is make drones and hit random targets. The rest of the world on the other hand, we have a certain level of comfort that we want and need. What would you do if the power was shut off for days on end? Continue to support this war? I highly doubt it. Now, how about 8 or 10 dollars a gallon for gas? Hyper inflation due to such? How much pain are you willing to endure for this war?
3
DrJupeman 6 days ago +2
All the rest? Quite a few countries produce oil. The US, for example, produces 2x as much oil as the next largest producer (Saudi Arabia).
2
azhillbilly 6 days ago +4
And right now, the US is releasing the strategic oil reserves at an incredible pace. 172 million barrels are being released right now out of 398 total. And that’s not even slowing down the losses in oil inventories. US inventories are down 2.3 million barrels this week alone. The US is not a nationalized oil industry. The oil companies are selling oil to the countries that are not receiving oil from the gulf. And even though we are releasing the strategic oil reserves faster than ever before, gas prices have doubled in just a few weeks. Now picture what happens when the reserves are depleted by the end of summer? You ready for 8 dollars a gallon gas? What do you think that’s going to do to the economy?
4
Elendils_Bear 6 days ago -16
Yet they are winning. We cant stay there indefinitely. We leave, they go back to making far more than they ever have on taxing ships. This doesnt end with a weak president like trump in charge.
-16
ResponsibleClock9289 6 days ago +13
I don’t know how you can consider plummeting oil revenue, and fractured leadership as winning They’re holding a gun to shipping through Hormuz because that is quite literally all they can do at this point. Even a small terrorist group like the Houthis managed to do that. That is not winning If they thought they were winning and only had to “outlast” the US, then they wouldn’t even be coming to the negotiating table. They know the rest of the world won’t tolerate their bullshit in the strait forever and they are quickly losing grace with China
13
Elendils_Bear 6 days ago -11
They rejected biglys peace plan even though it caved on basically everything. They aren't at the table - he is because he is about to lose midterms unless the supreme court manages to overturn a century of voting laws.
-11
ResponsibleClock9289 6 days ago +5
Tbh we really don’t know what’s going on with negotiations. Both sides say different things But yea hopefully he gets thrashed in midterms. Unfortunately he still has control of foreign policy though
5
BendicantMias 6 days ago -18
The article acknowledges that. But they still make the blockade less effective, significantly affecting the likelihood of Iran capitulating. As indeed they still aren't. The point is Trump is upselling his war far more than he can deliver (at least without an invasion). Which I suppose wouldn't be surprising given this is Trump we're talking about here, but many seem to think he's completely cut Iran off. Basically Trump is desperate for easy ways to win. And Iran keeps not giving that to him. And his latest gamble may not either.. Which would explain why he lost patience and tried to break through Irans' control of the Strait by force recently, only to again cancel his vaunted 'Project Freedom' barely a day later. He's getting impatient.
-18
[deleted] 6 days ago -13
[deleted]
-13
ResponsibleClock9289 6 days ago +12
The US isn’t blockading an ocean they’re blockading Iranian ports in the strait of Hormuz
12
_WhatchaDoin_ 6 days ago +4
People are missing the bigger picture. Iran needs some revenue, yes, but they also need to not fully stop the pumping in order to not damage their oil wells long term. Sure, they could lower the pumping by X%, just enough to avoid damages, and throw away the oil (short term loss, they cannot easily recoup if they don’t have long term storage). OR they could find a way to not throw away the oil, and sell it. Yes, trucks, pipelines, rails, whatever, is not efficient, is a logistics nightmare, and you probably making not much of a profit, but it is better than nothing, moving the oil, keep people busy, get some additional revenue that is just buying them a bit more time, while the US is figuring out how to get out of the situation, they put themselves in (and the rest of the world, but the US does not care about that). Remember that supposedly, the Iranian wells should all have exploded last week because of the blockade (Trump’s words, supposedly because Iran had to stop pumping). Clearly, Iran knows a thing or two how to handle the situation, and how to learn for next time, and they know how to play the clock.
4
BendicantMias 6 days ago +1
>Remember that supposedly, the Iranian wells should all have exploded last week because of the blockade (Trump’s words, supposedly because Iran had to stop pumping). Clearly, Iran knows a thing or two how to handle the situation The chart shown here at 4:45 demonstrates quite vividly that they've dealt with this situation before, and managed to deal with it for a very long time without losing their productive capacity - [https://youtu.be/VPkKJtO7eqU?si=enHcA43YQ5FOmUW5&t=285](https://youtu.be/VPkKJtO7eqU?si=enHcA43YQ5FOmUW5&t=285)
1
justwalk1234 6 days ago +11
I thought the whole point is to lift the blockade..
11
rube_X_cube 6 days ago +2
I thought the whole point was “unconditional surrender” 🤷‍♂️
2
MeatImmediate6549 6 days ago +11
I thought the whole point was Jeff Epstein didn't kill himself.
11
Muffafuffin 6 days ago
Surrender what?
0
jayrocksd 6 days ago +2
Dorothy
2
rube_X_cube 6 days ago
I don’t know, Trump said he wanted Iran’s “unconditional surrender.” Sure doesn’t seem like it happened.
0
[deleted] 6 days ago
[removed]
0
BendicantMias 6 days ago -1
Vance has mentioned demons tho - https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/apr/02/jd-vance-space-aliens-demons
-1
LouieXDEGC 6 days ago +4
Oil is shipped via pipeline from Russia thru Ukraine into Europe and Russia is making a TON of money
4
DarthPineapple5 6 days ago +6
Ah yes, it is overland trade with Turkmenistan which will finally end Iranian reliance on the ocean once and for all
6
Budgeko 6 days ago +7
Without cargo ships, Iran bleeds out. It’s literally that simple. This was our non-nuclear, nuclear play 🇺🇸🇺🇸
7
BendicantMias 6 days ago
No it isn't. The chart shown here at 4:45 demonstrates quite vividly that they've dealt with this situation before, and managed to deal with it for a very long time without losing their productive capacity - [https://youtu.be/VPkKJtO7eqU?si=enHcA43YQ5FOmUW5&t=285](https://youtu.be/VPkKJtO7eqU?si=enHcA43YQ5FOmUW5&t=285) And this is hardly your nuclear play, it's Trump flailing around and trying anything to avoid invading Iran. He himself seems unsatisfied with it already, as he's switched now to trying to unblock the Strait again.
0
Helpful-Leading-7948 6 days ago +2
Did they like dig a small trench from iranian ports to caspian sea?
2
Living_Natural1829 6 days ago +2
What? There is bypass to the strait that we don’t know about?
2
JC1949 6 days ago -1
The US hubris and ignorance have combined to demonstrate how might in the hands of fools evaporates. The whole world now knows how incompetent the US has become. Maybe news anchor people aren’t so smart after all.
-1
agenmossad 6 days ago -2
Seems like the US should put some embargo on Pakistan as well.
-2
WhatMeeWorry 6 days ago +3
Turkey, Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Afghanistan should also be included. Didn't we spend twenty years in neighboring Afghanistan and accomplished nothing?
3
_Eraux_ 6 days ago -1
So if they arent going to use the strait anymore, does that mean theyll use the bends?
-1
BendicantMias 6 days ago -10
> Trump claimed in late April that Iran’s “whole oil infrastructure is going to explode” because the US barricade was preventing Tehran from exporting its oil, the country’s economic lifeline. But experts are skeptical that the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz will force Tehran to capitulate or sign a peace deal on US terms. > Rosemary Kelanic, director of the Middle East Program at Defense Priorities, a Washington-based think tank, said Iran’s geography has lessened the blow of the US naval blockade. > A country of some 90-million people, Iran has nearly 6,000 kilometers of land borders with seven countries as well as a 700-kilometer-long coastline along the Caspian Sea, connecting it to Central Asia and Russia. > “The possibilities for the Iranians to ‘MacGyver’ their way around Trump's blockade are endless because the country has thousands of miles of land border to work with,” Kelanic added.
-10
← Back to Board