· 176 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 22, 2026 at 3:50 PM

Iran more capable than Trump administration is publicly acknowledging, sources say

Posted by CBSnews


Iran's military more capable than Trump administration is publicly acknowledging, sources say
www.cbsnews.com
Iran's military more capable than Trump administration is publicly acknowledging, sources say
About half of Iran's stockpile of ballistic missiles and its associated launch systems were still intact as of the start of the ceasefire in early April, officials said.

🚩 Report this post

176 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
doneandtired2014 Apr 22, 2026 +2056
Well...yeah, they've had 50 years to dig in, they're not flat broke like North Korea is, they're willing to get creative, and they've demonstrated they've been paying attention to modern conflicts instead of resting on their laurels.
2056
UnBearAble-1 Apr 22, 2026 +639
100 percent, the Iranians used down US predator drones, made them cheaper and now are one of maybe two or three leading forces in modern drone warfare. I’m counting Russia as a partial since it’s Iranian tech anyway
639
Throwaway5432154322 Apr 22, 2026 +312
Tbh I’d chalk up a lot of Iran’s supposed success at drone warfare to an absolute failure of Western CUAS innovation, doctrine & adoption, as opposed to Iranian technological genius. Shahed-type drones are artillery shells with fiberglass wings and a motor that fly directly at preprogrammed coordinates. They’re more like c**** cruise missiles than actual drones. It’s an abject failure of Western+allied CUAS adaptation and procurement that makes them a threat, not something inherent in their design or employment by the Iranians.
312
cb_24 Apr 22, 2026 +119
Russia has iterated on those initial designs to make them harder to destroy, like jet versions, adding cameras, and even anti-aircraft missiles. They’ve been using them to strike moving targets like locomotives and even aircraft hunting drones. It’s likely they’ve provided them as part of whatever agreements they have.
119
Throwaway5432154322 Apr 22, 2026 +27
Yep, you're right, unmanned strike & CUAS (broadly construed) are currently locked in a vicious, proverbial "race to the sea" right now, iterating new updates on a sub-4 week cycle and pushing out new products/variants as fast as possible... in Ukraine, at least. It's moronic that the CUAS side has been so neglected by not just the US, but also the GCC, and honestly most other "Western bloc" countries. That said, while unmanned strike has an "edge" right now, CUAS is going to leapfrog it sooner or later (IMO sooner) - then unmanned strike will leapfrog again, then CUAS, then unmanned strike, and on, and on, and on...
27
Black_Moons Apr 22, 2026 +36
Well of course its been neglected. There is no money to be made selling c**** drones and c**** anti-drone weapons. The western military industrial complex is only interested in making multi-million dollar missiles that only cost a few grand in parts to make and only investing in the minimal amount of factory and staff to make them. Working for your money? nah the rich don't play that game.
36
zedascouves1985 Apr 22, 2026 +16
The UK invented a laser that can kil drones at two pounds a shot. Unfortunately it's only going to be installed in destroyers in 2027. But it's NATO's first country to adopt such a thing. Also unfortunately the UK has only 10 destroyers or so. That's a different question though.
16
DestroyerofCurries Apr 23, 2026 +17
Laser weapons are affected by weather and can only target one drone at a time effectively. Far from a silver bullet to drones.
17
[deleted] Apr 23, 2026 +4
[deleted]
4
FingerGungHo Apr 23, 2026 +3
Wouldn’t a mirror foil on the drone work to at least degrade the effectiveness?
3
Black_Moons Apr 22, 2026 +7
Yea because the UK isn't interested in getting invaded by Russia any decade soon. As opposed to the US just trying to funnel as much taxpayer money to the rich as possible.
7
TSL4me Apr 23, 2026 +7
Ohh yea, i dont think anyone realizes how vulnerable the worlds trains are now with drones.
7
Fn_Spaghetti_Monster Apr 23, 2026 +7
I'm sure a lot of people don't realize how much freight trains still get moved by trains. 28% in the US..
7
Goat_inna_Tree Apr 23, 2026 +6
"freight trains still get moved by trains." That is how trains work.
6
neonlexicon Apr 23, 2026 +2
And in the US it's all poorly maintained & they overload everything to haul at least 3x more than they should, so it would be pretty easy to sabotage. A strong enough breeze could probably do it.
2
Ferreman Apr 22, 2026 +60
It's actually insane how badly prepared the USA was on this front. They've seen what's happening in Ukraine for years and they still weren't prepared.
60
Throwaway5432154322 Apr 22, 2026 +45
Oh trust me bro, I work in the defense tech sector in the US, and I know/work closely with a lot of Ukrainian defense companies & defense-oriented organizations. You can only imagine how I feel about this lol
45
T8ert0t Apr 23, 2026 +9
And Ukraine was offering to train
9
ZeroActual Apr 23, 2026 +6
What’s crazy is I was in the Army back in 2010 and all we talked about was strapping grenades to toy drones and flying them over enemies to deliver them. We knew it was coming if not already arrived. There we were, smoking cigarettes, imagining what it would be like to be on the receiving end of a drone swarm.
6
PsychologicalSet8678 Apr 22, 2026 +54
Iran has specifically designed it's strategy against the vulnerabilities of militaries like the US who can crush you in a classic war, but cannot fight with you asymetrically. It's a genius idea, and the US because of its role in its hegemony, cannot counter it effectively without becoming vulnerable against classic warfare powers like Russia/China.
54
T-sigma Apr 22, 2026 +33
While I don’t think you are necessarily wrong, this is about oil and their strategy is about winning the economic and political war against US citizens living paycheck to paycheck. Not surprisingly, the US and Trump weren’t prepared for this. Trump won’t even remember it by next week.
33
Katashi90 Apr 23, 2026 +7
Of course they weren't prepared for this. The war wasn't waged with their people in mind. Trump didn't come up of manipulating other nation's oil to bolster US economy, he's doing it to line up his cronies pockets and messing with the stock market. It's no wonder US citizens are the ones paying the price for him.
7
Utterlybored Apr 23, 2026 +3
I’m just an average Joe, but even I knew of Iran’s potential to shut down the Strait of Hormuz and cripple the global economy. The USA knew it, but Trump and his clown car of advisors somehow didn’t.
3
Amethyst-Flare Apr 22, 2026 +4
True, but however they got there, they got there.
4
Throwaway5432154322 Apr 22, 2026 +5
Agree, but war is never linear, and capabilities that are effective now will not be effective in the future.
5
FrostBricks Apr 22, 2026 +4
Depends how you define success. Building big, multibillion dollar vessels and arms are great for business buddies profits and photo ops. But you're not meant to use them. Y'know, it's all about priorities.
4
HappilyDisengaged Apr 22, 2026 +7
This is the cycle. The us faced similar learning curves in a post world war, guerilla led conflicts, like Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan. Now it’s Iran. It’s the US’s smaller poorer adversary who usually teaches the US the next war, while remaining undefeated vs the US
7
soulstormfire Apr 22, 2026 +26
What cycle? The US didn't really learn from those losses.
26
moop44 Apr 23, 2026 +4
It's an excellent way to transfer wealth from the poorest voters and up to the wealthiest. Works 100% of the time.
4
ilikedmatrixiv Apr 23, 2026 +2
Iran makes something c**** yet effective: shabby design, the fact it's effective is due to our shortcomings, not their success. The West makes something c**** yet effective: innovative design, the fact it's effective is due to our foresight and skill.
2
Kevin-W Apr 23, 2026 +7
Plus they're a massive country and a natural forretress with lots of mountains. Every expert have warned that going to war with Iran would have been a disaster and welp, lo and behold.
7
Kataphractoi Apr 23, 2026 +3
Anyone remember when [this](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-16095823) happened? Their drone tech got a big boost from this incident, no doubt.
3
throwaway277252 Apr 22, 2026 +8
> the Iranians used down US predator drones, made them cheaper Most of their reverse engineered knockoffs are similar in appearance only, but lack the same capabilities. They often copy design features without being able to duplicate their function just to make it look alike.
8
ralpher1 Apr 22, 2026 +45
North Korea isn’t broke anymore. Russia has paid them for arms and soldiers for the past few years.
45
Peacer13 Apr 23, 2026 +43
Whatever economic status North Korea is, they got nukes. They're relatively safe from US 
43
friendlyspork Apr 23, 2026 +8
What Russia had paid them pales in comparison to how many hundred of billions of dollars they make each year with crypto thefts. Also, keep in my mind North Korea was essentially stealing Bitcoin from the get-go, and I doubt they sold/laundered all of it. Kim Jong Un is the OG diamond hands.
8
Plzlaw4me Apr 22, 2026 +85
It also helps that they have actual goals, whereas our goal going in was to distract from our president raping kids, and now our only goal is to try to minimize the pending global economic catastrophe we put in motion.
85
Khaldara Apr 23, 2026 +5
Hey it’s not JUST raping kids. Sometimes it’s convincing the idiots that voted for him that letting him manipulate the stock market and embezzle from Americans is in their best interest.
5
the_hair_of_aenarion Apr 22, 2026 +6
World leader in battle proven c**** drones too. They didn't sell all of them to Russia. They've got stockpiles.
6
2Autistic4DaJoke Apr 22, 2026 +6
My biggest impression of this is that the American Military ego and bolstering has caused a lack of innovation and preparation for modern warfare.
6
Any-Monk-9395 Apr 23, 2026 +3
The North Koreans are still leagues smarter than the Iranians because they actually built nukes. No future invasions for them.
3
nathism Apr 22, 2026 +116
Value engineering is a skill that Iran and the Ukrainians have honed while the US and Russia focused on how to make the oliogarchs richer
116
Traditional_Drama_91 Apr 22, 2026 +614
Good thing the US haven’t given them a few weeks to reorganize their defenses. (I don’t support the war, I’m just continuously astonished by the strategic incompetence of this administration)
614
badasimo Apr 22, 2026 +259
I don't think it was by choice. The US didn't organize their offense (and local defense), used all their "fast" options trying to... I don't know what. Whatever they will do next, there is only one certainty-- it will be expensive
259
Nextasy Apr 22, 2026 +185
They didn't even move their extremely expensive and scarce radar systems. Iran knew exactly where they were, because they've always been in those locations, and did some serious damage to the US' ability to counter missile threats in the ME the second the war started. The US and allies were really caught with their pants down there. Here's a quick rundown on their best missile defense systems: ---------------- For top-of-the-line missile defense, the US has 8 THAAD batteries total (WorldwidE). Each THAAD battery has 1 high-end AN/TPY-2 Radar system, which serves as the defense nucleus and also supports other, smaller anti-missile systems. Of the 8 US THAAD batteries, five typically defend the USA, one is in Guam, one in South Korea, and the last one is unknown (probably Middle East). Outside of the radars with these 8 THAADs, the US has had another 5 AN/TPY-2s delivered. One was once reported at a Turkish Airbase, used by the US. The Saudi's have purchased some THAADs, they had 1 delivered as of last year, and it's probably the only one they've got. Takes a long time to get these things delivered. The UAE purchased 2 THAADs, which have been delivered. So in total in the ME, at the outset of the war, there were: * 1x Saudi THAAD * 2x UAE THAADs * *probably* 1x American THAAD Each of these is reliant on a single AN/TPY-2 radar system, which is not easily replaced. ------- Within 3 days of the war (but probably on day one when the biggest flurry happened) the Iranians [destroyed](https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/05/middleeast/radar-bases-us-missile-defense-iran-war-intl-invs) the AN/TPY-2 Radars of THAADs at: * Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia (probably the single Saudi battery) * Al Ruwais Industrial City (First UAE THAAD Battery) * Al Sader Farms (Second UAE THAAD Battery) * Muwaffaq Al Salti Base in Jordan (probably the unknown US THAAD) At a quick count, that's severely degraded, if not disabled entirely, ALL the THAADs that are tyically available for defense in the Mid east. *All of them!* NONE of them were apparently moved from their usual locations before the outset of the war. The radars alone are $500mil a pop. Explains why the US had to pull the THAAD out of South Korea, because it's either that, or leave gaps in the continental US. --------- Besides that, there's also the AN/FPS-132 radar in Qatar. This was blown up by Iran by the 3rd of March. These are not mobile, and they are the highest-level radar systems for ballistics missiles. There are 6 of these in the world, and 5 of them defend North America. The 6th was in Qatar. Over a billion dollars for one of these. -------- So yeah, lots of people (including me) were surprised at how many of Iran's missiles and drones were able to get through missile defenses, and how quickly they ate up the western stockpiles of interceptors. But if you don't have the radars, it's much harder to track the missiles, and you end up needing to use the expensive systems on even some of the little stuff. It explains a lot, knowing how badly the radar systems were hit. Iran knew what they were doing. What's bizarre is the total lack of preparation from the US and allies. These systems were extremely obvious targets, they're the most important card in the missile defense strategy. How TF did they fail to defend *any* of them?? Extreme incompetence in planning, honestly unbelievable. You could blame it on Trump, but honestly, I'm not sure that even the president's failures could cause this big of a f***-up. It's a wonder more americans didn't die.
185
Black_Moons Apr 22, 2026 +68
>How TF did they fail to defend any of them?? Extreme incompetence in planning, honestly unbelievable. You could blame it on Trump, but honestly, I'm not sure that even the president's failures could cause this big of a f***-up. It's a wonder more americans didn't die. Almost like all the generals who knew what they where doing where fired at the start of the war and replaced with yes-men who didn't have a clue what they where doing.
68
rayjaymor85 Apr 23, 2026 +2
Yep. Most likely the Generals that knew what they were doing told Trump that attacking Iran was "dumb as f***" and they got sacked for it.
2
heisian Apr 22, 2026 +32
we should absolutely blame trump, because policy prior to his administration was capitulation through diplomacy, not war.
32
moop44 Apr 23, 2026 +29
You should blame Republicans and not allow them to use Trump as a scapegoat. The majority of all branches of government that were put there by the majority of voters made this happen.
29
Reckfulness Apr 23, 2026 +5
While I agree blaming trump, I have no doubt that Netanyahu forced Trumps hand seeing how war hungry he is and how much he hates Iran, Trump was just like "f*** it lets do it then"
5
AdPure5645 Apr 23, 2026 +4
Wow. Thank you for the write up. I saw that Iran had taken out some radar stuff but did not know the importance or anything about thaad.
4
PsychologicalSet8678 Apr 22, 2026 +29
> It's a wonder more americans didn't die. They are covering it up, a book will be released a few years down the road uncovering this mess.
29
Traditional_Drama_91 Apr 22, 2026 +39
Eh, I don’t think there’s a cover up considering just how prevalent dead troop worship and social media is here in the US. Without massive payouts there’s no way the families stay silent, and some just wouldn’t even if you tried 
39
jellyhessman Apr 22, 2026 +18
There were reports by folks on the ground of a lot more people being flown into Germany for medical care than were reported by the US military.
18
Traditional_Drama_91 Apr 22, 2026 +19
Wounded is a different story 
19
PastryAssassinDeux Apr 22, 2026 +22
dead american contractors aren't required to be reported as killed in action unfortunately.
22
LargeBrownBird Apr 22, 2026 +16
I mean the mysterious hero pilot that was found is still MIA
16
Throwaway5432154322 Apr 22, 2026 +15
Damn, this is a wild info bubble that I haven’t had the misfortune of encountering until now
15
soulstormfire Apr 23, 2026 +4
hold up. how does that work?
4
LargeBrownBird Apr 23, 2026 +8
It means we lied about the perfectly executed rescue operation that was all over the news for about 20 minutes
8
soulstormfire Apr 23, 2026 +2
Dude wasn't rescued? :D
2
Larcye Apr 23, 2026 +5
If it comes out that the MIA pilot was in fact found dead in a few years it's going to look very bad.
5
LargeBrownBird Apr 23, 2026 +9
I look forward to hearing the news when it eventually reaches whatever work camp for socialists I've been sent to
9
RickAstleyletmedown Apr 23, 2026 +2
Or it was just a black woman and Trump didn’t want to put her on camera.
2
MyAltimateIsCharging Apr 22, 2026 +7
Considering the US is only barely starting to officially admit admit there were firefights outside Abbey Gate and the Kabul Airport *this year*, I would not be surprised if they're trying to sweep things under the rug.
7
sadacal Apr 22, 2026 +9
Given how this administration has been inclined to ignore rules, I wouldn't be surprised if they're delaying reporting deaths. And they are definitely downplaying the wounded numbers.
9
CouldBeLessDepressed Apr 22, 2026 +6
Coverup or no, just give it time. There will be more American deaths. Possibly by the tens of thousands if store shelves run bare because our global logistics went down because of a sudden and prolonged nearly 1/3 drop in the fuel supply, fertilizer supply, and other petrochemicals supply. Seems it will hit other parts of the world first, but the USA wont go through this unscathed. Our strategic reserve should run out around July. After that, hope everyone has a backup. For those who see this and feel the need to type out "USA is a net-exporter" as though that means anything at all, I just wanna say in advance: LOL. LMAO even.
6
HeWhoDefiles Apr 22, 2026 -8
This isn’t accurate and these claims that have no credible evidence, I’d like to see you try to prove this by linking credible reports. Giving paid Iranian misinformation vibes. Yes, the U.S. and allies operate THAAD and AN/TPY-2 radar in the region, and yes they’re high-value assets. But there’s NO verified reporting that Iran destroyed multiple THAAD radars, hit bases like Prince Sultan or Muwaffaq Al Salti in that way, or took out a strategic AN/FPS-132 radar in Qatar. If that had happened, it would be major global news with satellite confirmation and likely a U.S. response. Our mainstream news media would salivate at an opportunity to put down the current admin and the headlines would be constantly pushed down our throat if this actually happened. Yes the THAAD radar in Jordan was hit and some non THAAD radar damage is shown by satellite imagery in UAE / Saudi but there is ZERO high confidence reporting about what you are saying. Missile defenses obviously can get stressed by large salvos, depleted interceptor stock, but the “all radars wiped out / total collapse” narrative isn’t supported and also our cost of interceptor tech has been drastically reduced to the point where it costs more to make the missiles than the interceptors which I’ll admit used to not be the case. Crazy work your comment is upvoted where anyone who just does some leg work in verifying can realize it’s not a credible narrative.
-8
Nextasy Apr 23, 2026 +39
>I'd like to see you try to prove this by linking credible reports. Giving paid Iranian misinformation vibes Not everything thats hard for you to hear is Iranian propaganda lmao. I'm not some big fan of the Ayatollah >If that had happened, it would be major global news with satellite confirmation Did you even bother to look at the link in my comment? It's literally CNN (which is major global news, before you go all "CNN isn't credible" on me) and their reporting is based entirely on in-depth satellite footage, the article was out a week after the war began. >and likely a U.S. response. Hmm, have you not wondered why they [demanded](https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/03/satellite-firm-pauses-imagery-after-revealing-irans-attacks-on-us-bases/) planetlabs stop releasing footage of US bases? Planetlabs is literally the source of half the imagery in the CNN article. >But there’s NO verified reporting that Iran destroyed multiple THAAD radars, hit bases like Prince Sultan or Muwaffaq Al Salti in that way... >Yes the THAAD radar in Jordan was hit... Spoiler, the THAAD in Jordan was at Muwaffaq Al Salti. There's also satellite of damage at Prince Sultan. >there is ZERO high confidence reporting about what you are saying. I mean, I don't know what you expect besides satellite imagery. It's not like these systems are on the roof of some guys apartment with hundreds of civilians around. Are you waiting for the US military to come out and announce that they're shit got blown up? Oh wait, is that why they're moving "components" and radars from THAAD system out of Korea to the middle east? Or is that just for shits? >“all radars wiped out / total collapse” I didn't say either of those things but hey, if that's what it takes to paint me as an Iranian paid propagandists, keep stuffing propaganda in my mouth I guess. There's a reason I *specifically listed* the THAADs and how they are typically accounted for, then counted up the direct hits shown on satellite footage. If you have a problem with my math, tell me how your math works, so that I can correct my understanding. Don't just show up and say "no that's wrong because I don't like the narrative." And for the record, here is the source on the US having 8 batteries and their locations. Hope it's "reliable" enough for you: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12645 If you think the one in Jordan was anything but the unaccounted american battery, I'm ready to hear why.
39
Micp Apr 22, 2026 +39
>used all their "fast" options trying to... I don't know what They thought that if they just took out the head of the regime the rest of them would just roll over and surrender. They thought that just because the population were protesting the regime at the time that they would greet the US with open arms, as if they didn't hate the US more than they hated the supreme leader. In'n'out, quick 20 minute adventure...
39
Nippon-Gakki Apr 22, 2026 +15
Sounds almost like another 3 day operation that didn’t quite go as planned.
15
Kataphractoi Apr 23, 2026 +2
Needs to be higher up. This literally was their entire plan.
2
Traditional_Drama_91 Apr 22, 2026 +12
Yup, if only we had known what a boondoggle this would be for like, 50 year or something. Oh wait..
12
monkeypincher Apr 22, 2026 +3
They used all their "fast" options trying to distract from the epstein files.
3
Ok-Drawer5245 Apr 22, 2026 +38
What Trump is not saying publicly, but numerous signs point to, is that the US weapon stockpiles are under immense pressure (the US simply lacks the production means to win an extended conflict of this sort). This is probably the reason why Trump don’t really want to continue the war. It turns out, after all, that using 4m$ missiles to shot down 25k$ drones is not a particularly good idea. Either way the entire war, one big dumbass gamble that the Iranian government would be overthrown by the people, is the biggest strategic blunder in 50 years or more. Trump thinking himself the best president in history is shaping up to be the worst.
38
soulstormfire Apr 23, 2026 +10
I don't think they wanted a revolution. It's much more likely they wanted to raise a docile 2nd in command like in Venezuela.
10
joper90 Apr 23, 2026 +5
Yep, they said revolution, but they wanted someone softer who they could then abuse for oil/gas/minerals etc etc and make them a lot of money.
5
WingerRules Apr 23, 2026 +2
I'm no expert in this stuff, I'm wondering if the issue is transporting the stockpiles there, not production. They seemed to have went in with little planning/preparing ahead of time and are still spending time getting assets there like additional ships and carriers and didnt get clearances approved with other countries to run operations out of them or see if they would join them (turns out the answer is no).
2
LesothoBro Apr 23, 2026 +9
Negative, it's production time AND transporting combined. The US was already sitting at 25% readiness of stockpile (stand-off munitions) after last years attack on Iran and prior year's supply of weapons to Ukraine. Raytheon, Lockheed, Boeing and L3Harris are all manufacturing dependencies for the PAC-3 intercept systems and there is only about 500 units produced annually which are spread across the US military, strategic allies and other 3rd party purchasers. In short, the US doesn't have the military industrial complex to engage Iran in its current capacity of waging asymmetrical warfare with drones targeting Israel and the GCC states. It is taking 4-5 interceptors for each drone or missile fired by Iran... if you do the math, it doesn't go well for the GCC or Israel if this continues. There is also some [reporting](https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/trump-administration-wants-ford-gm-033107863.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAC56fg5sjkQ91RAf8Ja3d8jOzhIwHiXS1QZvn5vDEeq_XnPshEJVcdMQKpHDskvWvvVHlGLnMaQlshLgt6veBNbvsD5K8DEuWi1jE60lNPrvhGrpTpCY2QeKz7Mthw2euQ5kvby-tMKAtXUzjgVrpQTJOVKqKCzgWgMgG4E8XWhk) that the US administration has approached Ford and GM to repurpose their manufacturing to accommodate military production. This is NOT a sign that all is good.
9
WingerRules Apr 23, 2026 +3
I thought most of what we were giving to Ukraine was outdated/end of life stuff and stuff about to expire?
3
LesothoBro Apr 23, 2026 +3
Still counts as inventory.
3
Flatus_Diabolic Apr 23, 2026 +7
The US and Israel were almost out of air defence missiles - [they basically blew through more Patriot missiles in two weeks than the Ukrainians have used in the last four years. That’s more than half of the USA’s total military reserve](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/war-iran-used-half-us-073648390.html). The US needed the ceasefire to rearm and “reorganise their defences” far more than the Iranians did. On top of that, the flight hours for America and Israel’s jets must be really getting up there by now, I wonder how many of their birds will be due for Intermediate or Depot (shipped back stateside) level servicing.
7
Ok-Drawer5245 Apr 23, 2026 +3
Whenever Trump has said that the Iranians are desperate for peace, what he really means is that He is desperate for peace
3
dCLCp Apr 23, 2026 +3
Tactical incompetence. There was never even a hint of strategy here.
3
utrangerbob Apr 22, 2026 +28
Iran is the size of 2.5 Texas with 93 million people. It's also a natural fortress full of mountains. Dumbass in chief looks at a map, sees it the on the equator and thinks a flat plain and not that big compared to the countries around it. We can do it with 2500 marines and 2 carriers right?
28
Strykerz3r0 Apr 22, 2026 +31
I'm surprised we don't have a Sharpie that can handle this like when he rerouted the hurricane.
31
Traditional_Drama_91 Apr 22, 2026 +28
> Don’t siege Leningrad, take it immediately  This is the level of acumen this administration is bringing to the table.  You got them on record saying “all other administrations did war stupid”
28
bloop7676 Apr 22, 2026 +11
Part of that is I think a fair number of people really believed that many of those 93 million would actually be on their side, that everyone in Iran hated the government and was just waiting for this chance to get rid of them. They bought into the whole thing of "the people being the boots on the ground", so with some stretch of the imagination the 2500 marines could seem like enough
11
NiewinterNacht Apr 22, 2026 +4
"We will be greeted as liberators"
4
heisian Apr 22, 2026 +3
democracy!!!! *bombs dropping*
3
heisian Apr 22, 2026 +7
yes, the population will rise up just as one of the missiles destroyed a girls’ school. the ego is insane. in what historical event has a nation overthrown its govt due to being bombed by a foreign country?
7
teaisformugs82 Apr 22, 2026 +8
I'm assuming it's trump that thinks it on the equator and not you?!
8
Traditional_Drama_91 Apr 22, 2026 +7
They probably had “mercator” autocorrected
7
teaisformugs82 Apr 22, 2026 +3
Ok that makes more sense particularly with saying how large other countries are around it since Iran is larger than all it's land border countries!
3
Deletereous Apr 23, 2026 +2
Marines could rappel from the equator and take the country in one night.
2
Helios0186 Apr 22, 2026 +215
Are we surprised the Trump administration lied again? No.
215
Mutchmore Apr 22, 2026 +50
At this point it would be more surprising that they're telling the truth..
50
amitkoj Apr 22, 2026 +11
They are arrogant and naive. A dangerous combo. One wonder what other landmine will they walk us into over next 3 years.
11
luxurywhipp Apr 23, 2026 +1
All you people need are the words ‘sources say’ and you’ll believe anything. Does anyone possess enough critical thinking to understand that it’s in Iran’s interest to spread these ideas as far and wide as possible as part of their war strategy? But people hate Trump so much that they leave their critical thinking at the door.
1
Substantial_Milk8170 Apr 22, 2026 +127
Downplaying a geopolitical adversary's capabilities purely for domestic PR. Because historically, underestimating your opponent to save face has *always* worked out flawlessly.
127
Sephret Apr 22, 2026 +26
Agent Krasnov imports only the finest in Russian strategic stoogery.
26
CFCYYZ Apr 22, 2026 +171
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle. \- Sun Tzu "The Art of War"
171
Icy-Scarcity Apr 22, 2026 +111
They don't do Sun Tzu. They use "Art of the Deal" remember?
111
PrivatePilot9 Apr 22, 2026 +61
America is using tactics from the mind of Sundowning Tzu instead.
61
Lets_Kick_Some_Ice Apr 22, 2026 +9
Sundowning* but solid joke.
9
PrivatePilot9 Apr 22, 2026 +8
Dammit, that was ducking autocorrect. Fixing.
8
Kataphractoi Apr 23, 2026 +11
Nah, the Book of Don Tzu. (not mine, copy-pasted it into a chat weeks ago from another listnook post) > "Tariff, belittle and threaten to invade your allies. Nothing bad can happen, it can only good happen." - Don Tzu. > "If you don't know what you're doing, neither will your enemy." - ⁠Don Tzu > "Surprise your enemies by backstabbing your allies" - Don Tzu >"Surprise your allies by befriending your enemies." -Don Tzu >"To command attention in a crowded room, shit yourself." - Don Tzu >"promise a plan in 2-3 weeks, in 2-3 weeks deliver nothing" - Don Tzu >"If you find yourself in a deep hole, keep digging but make sure you do it with the most expensive shovel available." - Don Tzu >"Don't try to understand war, economy, or diplomacy, for this is an impossible task. It's all computer." - Don Tzu >"Break an enemy blockade by blockading their blockade." - Don Tzu
11
Throwaway5432154322 Apr 22, 2026 +14
I guarantee that if Trump ever learned who Sun Tzu was, he would near-instantaneously claim that *Art of War* “wasn’t as good” as *Art of the Deal*.
14
Yvaelle Apr 22, 2026 +5
Or he would claim he wrote The Art of War
5
whythoyaho Apr 23, 2026 +3
“Shart” of the deal
3
LaoTzeMachiavelli Apr 22, 2026 +6
I approve of this message…
6
FunnyOneJC Apr 23, 2026 +2
The Trump Regime and the Secretary of War failed hard at Sun Tse’s art of war.
2
thput Apr 22, 2026 +13
That because hegseth and the idiots he has not fired all over estimate their own capabilities and underestimate everyone else. This sounds like normal for this administration.
13
gatesartist Apr 22, 2026 +32
That headline gave me a stroke
32
Ace220611 Apr 23, 2026 +6
sources say is a lowest form of journalism
6
SingularityCentral Apr 22, 2026 +28
The incompetence on display from the Administration is truly staggering.
28
bigedthebad Apr 22, 2026 +15
Why do these guys keep making the same mistake, over and over again? I know Hegseth is behind this, he convinced Trump that we could go in there, wipe them out in 10 minutes and be home for lunch. They were convinced this would be an easy win, that Iran, who has been defying the West for almost 40 years, would just roll over. I guess stupid is as stupid does.
15
Flatus_Diabolic Apr 23, 2026 +12
Nah, I think the one who’s behind this is Netanyahu. He’s been wanting the USA to help him do this for decades, but in Trump, he finally found someone gullible and arrogant enough to agree to it, probably because he was high off the smell of his own farts after his military successes in Venezuela and the 12 Day War, so he thought this would be another easy win to flex over. Hegseth would have been excited for the chance to pose and say badass things at a podium like he’s filming a trailer for an action movie starring himself, but I strongly doubt he talked Trump into much of anything. The interesting thing is Trump: he’s always been the kind of guy to not take a success and move on - it’s why everything he does always fails. He sees a small success as an invitation to go bigger and bigger, taking incrementally more and more risk, committing himself to larger and larger military “excursions” until eventually he over commits and someone claps back or the investment doesn’t pay off like it did before, and then whatever business venture it was goes bankrupt or he ends up trapped in a quagmire, then he slinks away and looks for a new grift. That’s why I’m surprised he’s already talking about Cuba - he’s burnt his fingers now, but he’s going in again anyway, which is out of character. I can’t wait to see how Biden will be to blame for the massive influx of illegal Cuban migrants into Florida after Cuba collapses.
12
DeeplyEepy Apr 22, 2026 +36
I thought their military capabilities were obliterated? Are you telling me that Donald J. Trump lied?
36
thecloakofignorance Apr 22, 2026 +31
decimated is the correct word, i.e., reduced by 10%
31
DeeplyEepy Apr 22, 2026 +6
Is that what decimated actually means? lol
6
thecloakofignorance Apr 22, 2026 +25
yes. It was this weird roman thing where they would punish a legion by executing one in ten soldiers
25
DeeplyEepy Apr 22, 2026 +4
Huh. I had no idea! Thank you for the history on that.
4
Flatus_Diabolic Apr 23, 2026 +3
> executing That’s a fairly mild way of describing it. The remaining 9 would be ordered to beat their 10th compatriot to death with their bare hands. Decimation was reserved for legions that had disgraced themselves in battle by fleeing. Killing more than 10% of them would be a loss of valuable resources, but the Romans definitely knew how to use quality of a punishment to make up for quantity (just ask Jesus) so, on the whole, it could have been a lot worse than merely being pummelled to death by your own friends.
3
tanaephis77400 Apr 22, 2026 +5
Mostly a legend though. It happened maybe half a dozen times over the course of many centuries, and always on a very small scale (like 15 executions out of a 150 soldiers unit). Roman soldiers were citizens who could legally appeal their punishment, so extreme punitive measures would have been very unpopular and counter-productive. It's still a cool origin story for the word though.
5
ren_reddit Apr 22, 2026 +2
Yes, You know, the Metric system and all that..
2
According-Bet-141 Apr 22, 2026 +5
Everybody knew it except Trump and his trumpets. 
5
Texden29 Apr 22, 2026 +7
Of course Trump and Hegseth lied. Incompetent DEI hire. They’ve made our country the laughing stock of the world.
7
hoodlumonprowl Apr 22, 2026 +3
lol no shit. They can pretend the narrative is that we're "winning" but that is such a silly way to think about all of this.
3
Hefty-Comparison-801 Apr 22, 2026 +3
You need a source for this? My source is comparing what's been happening with what Trump and Kegseth say.
3
Giltar Apr 22, 2026 +3
No surprise
3
tykneedanser Apr 22, 2026 +3
There’s a reason no one, until dipshit, has tried this before.
3
Carittz Apr 23, 2026 +3
I mean they've shut down one of the most important trade routes in the world and have seemingly convinced the most powerful military on Earth that the cost of forcing it open again would be too high to be worth it.
3
Notonfoodstamps Apr 23, 2026 +3
I mean anyone with half a brain should know this. American propaganda is a thing ~~Veitnam~~ , and Iran, as shaky as it is, isn’t inept.
3
Normal-Rope6198 Apr 23, 2026 +3
What the heck is that title trying to say?
3
[deleted] Apr 22, 2026 +22
[deleted]
22
freeman_joe Apr 22, 2026 +12
So Schrödingers army?
12
Nextasy Apr 22, 2026 +14
Iran is definitely still hiding some valuable cards. I think they know they could go toe-to-toe with the Israeli and US bombings and escalate to the maximum, and the war would be over quick. (Apparently necessary clarification: it would be over quick because Iran would be defeated, regardless of losses to the US/israel. Sorry if anybody thought anything other than this was possible...) But even with some US losses , that would probably serve US interests better than Iran. I think they're waiting to see if an attempt at a ground invasion comes. Holding defense systems until they can hit a more valuable target is not unheard of, and Iran is a different country than the west. While they're definitely suffering, I think they'd be willing to let a lot more of their infrastructure be hit, than reveal all of their defenses. They know the way to win a war against the US isn't by destroying expensive aircraft, the US has near-unlimited money compared to Iran. The way to win a war against the US would be by blowing up transport planes and helicopters packed with US soldiers, and causing casualties by launching missiles at american forward bases in an invasion scenario. Blowing up expensive tech is embarrassing for the US military industry. Killing and maiming thousands of US soldiers is where the actual pressure would lie. Nobody reports much on the billions of dollars of radars that Iran blew up, they report on the 13 dead soldiers. Irans no dummy, and they're willing to take a beating. I imagine that's the opportunity that they're saving the other half of their military for.
14
Throwaway5432154322 Apr 22, 2026 +14
>I think they know they could go toe-to-toe with the Israeli and US bombings and escalate to the maximum, and the war would be over quick. Lmao this is awesome - definitely deserves a meme-type response, I'm just struggling with which one... Is it more like, "It's only a flesh wound!" Or, "HOLD HIM BACK" Or, "Doctors Hate Him! Get bombed 14,000 times - but its actually all part of this one simple trick!"
14
Nextasy Apr 23, 2026 +6
By that quote, I mean the war would be over quick, because everything would be spent. All of the irani materials, and maybe some US losses, but it would be over. Not that they would 1v1 the states and Israel and win. As for irans remaining capabilities, take it from [the head of the US defence intelligence agency](https://armedservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/lt._gen._adams_witness_statement.pdf), not me >Iran retains thousands of missiles and one-way attack UAVs that can threaten U.S. and partner forces throughout the region, despite degradations to its capabilities from both attrition and expenditure If these missiles and drone launchers were in use, they obviously would have been struck by the US and Israel during the bombings, right? The rational explanation is that they were deliberately not put out there. Unless you think the US just missed them or something, idk. >Iran’s ground and air forces have outdated equipment and limited training and sustained damage during coalition strikes; they almost certainly cannot defeat a technologically superior adversary. Iran likely will further asymmetric warfare advancements to augment its conventional capabilities as it remains in conflict with the United States and Israel. This is more what I was getting at. Iran knows it can't win toe-to-toe, and it will be over very quickly, which is not how you win a war against the US. You win by drawing it out in asymmetric warfare, a la Vietnam and Afghanistan.
6
RJCHI Apr 22, 2026 +6
I laughed too. Was that a typo? Lmao
6
Nextasy Apr 23, 2026 +3
It was a misunderstanding, I should have clarified, I didn't think anybody would interpret that as Iran defeating the US - by toe-to-toe, I meant "attempt to take them head on"
3
Throwaway5432154322 Apr 22, 2026 +5
Idk man haha, its an all-time comment though "I'm just saving my strength" - quote from man punched 100 times in the face
5
MareC0gnitum Apr 22, 2026 +4
Yeah, well we noticed...
4
Dark_World_Blues Apr 22, 2026 +14
True, and USA is much more capable than the Iranian media is publicly acknowledging. The Iranian media is extremely funny.
14
Solugad Apr 22, 2026 +9
So are all the people that eat it up lol
9
Dark_World_Blues Apr 22, 2026 +2
I agree
2
Yet_Another_Dood Apr 22, 2026 +2
USA is obviously the biggest military leader by a long shot. Iran doesn't supply the world's military lmao. But the conflict is nothing but a badly planned shitshow it seems.
2
heisian Apr 22, 2026 +2
equivalent to putin thinking he could sweep ukraine in a few days
2
Madblood Apr 22, 2026 +4
> Iran more capable than Trump administration ~~is publicly acknowledging, sources say~~ FTFY
4
hurdurnotavailable Apr 22, 2026 +13
Sources do say that? And what evidence do they have for that? How many targets was Iran able to destroy? How is their economy doing? Do people still overwhelmingly hate them? Surely not, I mean only 80% of the country hated them... but then they just killed tens of thousands, so surely that's not as bad anymore, right? nah, it's going really well for Iran. Sure, their currency is worthless, they have to keep internet off to prevent uprisings and their own population from destroying them. They're running out of water and can't pay their soldiers because of damage to banks datacenters. But hey, going really well! Ah, and let'S not forget the use of child soldiers and importing of iraqi & afghan shias because they're running out of soldiers for checkpoints so... they can terrorize their own population? lol
13
Megidolaon10 Apr 22, 2026 +2
But would you look at the US stock market? /s
2
Sweatytubesock Apr 22, 2026 +2
Imagine that.
2
ScottOld Apr 22, 2026 +2
Trump? Lying about something? Never
2
SuperTittySprinkles Apr 22, 2026 +2
Yes. Very obviously. When the man says completely obliterated and knocked out, then I know that in fact nothing has been obliterated and nothing has been knocked out. 
2
igot8001 Apr 23, 2026 +2
>Iran is more capable than Trump Administration FTFY
2
ModernAutomata Apr 23, 2026 +2
The proof is that despite "having won" twelve times over, we are still negotiating. And extremely poorly. Art of the deal more like art of dog shit. And we're still at the shit part.
2
Rynowash Apr 23, 2026 +2
You don’t f****** say.
2
LincolnElizalde Apr 23, 2026 +2
What is all this malarkey. The war is over. Iran agreed to everything. We are sending trucks to haul out the nuke stuff. The straight is open. Gas prices are the lowest since before the ‘73 embargo. This the best it’s ever been. Whatever “this” is……..
2
midnightrider747 Apr 23, 2026 +2
Well the military isnt the problem. The total shit show is the trump administration which just said do it without any plan whatsoever. Iran is very lucky to deal with incompetent idiots on the political lvl. And Trump cannot afford that massive amounts of body bags fly home on his account since using Soldiers will be the means to win since Iran is weaker military wise.
2
rayjaymor85 Apr 23, 2026 +2
You mean the other side's military of a war that we won 4 weeks ago and somehow still going on? You don't fkn say...
2
yee_88 Apr 23, 2026 +2
The US has been planning for innumerable events. Iran has been preparing for exactly ONE event; stopping an attacking force, either Israel or the US by closing the Strait of Hormuz. This makes the asymmetry far less important. Russia made the same mistake in attacking Ukraine. The US has wargamed this scenario and apparently have yet to figure out a solution. The Millennium Challenge 2002 had General Van Ripper represent Iranian forces. He used asymmetric warfare to win against the USA. Of course, the US re-did the exercise with restrictions that allowed the US to win anyway, a restriction that Iran does not currently have to obey.
2
darktumbles Apr 22, 2026 +4
Don't worry no one believes anything the Trump administration says anyway.
4
Tattered_Reason Apr 22, 2026 +3
But Mr. President Doctor Jesus TRUMP Sir said that Iran’s military had been completely obliterated several times over!
3
TheWorclown Apr 22, 2026 +2
… I’m kinda having a stroke reading this headline, I think.
2
abeBroham-Linkin Apr 22, 2026 +3
The way Trump keeps changing the narrative, they absolutely are more than capable of putting up a good fight. Afghanistan only has like 30-38 million people when the U.S was there for 20 years. What do you think 90 million people for Iran would do? Just twiddle their fingers?
3
nickname13 Apr 22, 2026 +3
the headline should have stopped after six words.
3
0b1w4hn Apr 22, 2026 +5
Iran can wait, the Iranian government don't give a shit about the Iranian people. If it is necessary they let there people starve and die until they get what they want. Trumps weakness is obvious for everybody, his bluffs don't work. Now the orange idiot wants a deal, something like a nuclear deal... maybe he should ask Obama and Biden how they managed to get a deal like that.
5
ThereInAFortnight Apr 22, 2026 +4
You can remove the words "is publicly acknowledging" and it's also true.
4
cscottjones87 Apr 23, 2026 +2
What is this title?
2
Raise_A_Thoth Apr 22, 2026 +3
I'll take "More Shit I Already Knew" for $500, Alex.
3
Got_Engineers Apr 22, 2026 +1
I wonder how much mind games Iran has been playing. The US has the insane advantage with surveillance and imaging and mapping and satellites. But Iran would also be able to do a lot of stuff to throw off the trail of the US. Like they could just build as many fake missile bunkers as real ones because satellites would never know if it’s real or not. Iran already has its own satellites from China
1
Cornelius-corbread Apr 22, 2026 +1
It’s almost like they had several decades of sky high tensions with the U.S. and Israel to prepare for this exact situation. Who woulda thought?
1
Wayelder Apr 22, 2026 +1
Trump thought he would just hide (from Trump/Epstein files) behind a tree, he ran into a saguaro cactus and now...it's got him. He is, of course, still unaware that the cactus was waiting for this.
1
Unfair-Plant-5605 Apr 22, 2026 +1
Lying conman grifter lies. More at 11
1
UnsolicitedNeighbor Apr 22, 2026 +1
I mean, those Lego themed diss tracks are bangers
1
← Back to Board