· 141 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 6, 2026 at 4:49 PM

Iran rejects ceasefire as deadline nears on Trump’s ‘hell’ ultimatum

Posted by CTVNEWS


Iran rejects ceasefire as deadline nears on Trump’s ‘hell’ ultimatum
CTVNews
Iran rejects ceasefire as deadline nears on Trump’s ‘hell’ ultimatum
Iran said on Monday it wanted a lasting end to the war with the U.S. and Israel, and pushed back against pressure to swiftly reopen the Strait of Hormuz under a temporary ceasefire as the Americans and the Iranians weighed a framework plan to cease their five‑week-old conflict.

🚩 Report this post

141 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
CFCYYZ 4 days ago +386
May 8 2018 Trump withdraws from the [Iran nuclear deal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_nuclear_deal). April 5 2026 Iran rejects ceasefire as deadline nears on Trump’s ‘hell’ ultimatum The world is what we make it.
386
GreenFox1505 4 days ago +186
When Ukraine gave up the USSR nuclear arsenal, it was under the promise that they would be protected from Russia. Everything Trump has done has accelerated a nuclear conflict. 
186
KickPuncher4326 4 days ago +80
This is why diplomatic deals continuing through presidents of different political parties has been extremely important. How can our enemies or allies trust our word when our word changes drastically every 4 or 8 years?
80
GfxJG 4 days ago +66
I mean, we will never be able to again. One man has single handedly ensured that the US is no longer the most powerful nation on Earth. Well, one man, and the roughly 150 million who either voted for him, or didn't think he was bad enough to warrant a vote against him.
66
Slothnazi 4 days ago -14
FYI roughly 75 million people voted for him, not 150 million
-14
DonFrio 4 days ago +32
And 75 million didn’t find it important enough to vote so f them too was their clearly made point
32
Specialist-Garbage94 4 days ago +6
Those 75 mil won’t vote again cause they “don’t care about politics” they will be bitching about gas prices though.
6
GfxJG 4 days ago +6
Please read my comment one more time, slowly this time.
6
GreenFox1505 4 days ago +14
This is why the president isn't suppose to be this involved in diplomacy. He can't sign treaties. He can't declare war. But if Congress isn't going to enforce it's power, then our global position is that our entire diplomatic position will change every 4-8 years. Which isn't a foundation that can be built on.
14
King_Fisher99 4 days ago +4
That’s why this was or is a ‘military operation’. His bud Pootin told him that
4
CFCYYZ 4 days ago +15
"As long as rivers flow, the sky is blue and the grass is green, or 90 days, whichever comes first."
15
-ferth 4 days ago +10
You’re banned from this historicsl society! You and your children and your children’s children… for three months.
10
MyDarlingArmadillo 4 days ago +6
It doesn't even take a change of party; he doesn't keep his own word anyway.
6
CrazyBaron 4 days ago +4
There wasn't such promises to protect. And only one that broke Budapest is Russia. Budapest Memorandum in large was just empty water with most of it basically same "obligations" countries have under UN anyway.
4
premature_eulogy 4 days ago +12
No, the Budapest memorandum guaranteed that the signatories would not attack Ukraine. It had no provisions for the US to *protect* Ukraine from Russia apart from raising the issue at the UN security council.
12
Churchbushonk 4 days ago +1
True, but it should have.
1
Greedy-Mechanic-4932 4 days ago
Yeah I think somewhere "not attack" has been misinterpreted as "will defend"...
0
Toph84 4 days ago +2
Please edit your comment. You are actively spreading decade old Russian misinformation points. > When Ukraine gave up the USSR nuclear arsenal, it was under the promise that they would be protected from Russia. This is a known years old Russian misinfo talking point that they spread that you are repeating (with +100 upvotes no less here). You can look up the Budapest Memorandum right now. What it promised is that neither the USA or Russia would invade Ukraine (which Russia obviously broke it), not that either would defend Ukraine from the other. Aka by simpler terms, it was a non-aggression pact, not a defensive pact or alliance. Russia used it as a misinfo point to gaslight attention away from the fact that they invaded Ukraine in 2014 when they took Crimes, despite promising to not attack, and put the blame on the USA to lead people into believing the USA chickened out and is not reliable. This exact point was used to convince ignorant people that Biden was weak and not really helping defend Ukraine (by lying about what the Budapest Memorandum was by telling them it said the US protects Ukraine despite it never saying that), and tell them Trump would be more "hard on Russia". Before the election, you could find people in this Listnook and pro-Ukraine Listnooks talking this exact point. Then Trump got elected and pulled all Ukraine aid he could, and has done far more continued damage to the concept of relying on Americans across the world.
2
Zealousideal-Run6020 4 days ago +1
It's almost like maybe this is the plan to address climate change. I hear Chernobyl is doing pretty well now.
1
xnmyl 3 days ago +1
Trump assassinated Solemani in 2020, very nearly starting a war with Iran. In hindsight, war was inevitable. Trump has wanted to go to war with Iran for years
1
bunker931 4 days ago +254
Is Trump finally going to do it or it is TACO Tuesday again?
254
swizzcheez 4 days ago +115
Worse.  He's going to read poetry at them.
115
dysphoric-foresight 4 days ago +62
I’ve often wondered if he’s secretly a Vogon.
62
SgtBaxter 4 days ago +3
Gotta make room for that space lane somehow.
3
96-62 4 days ago
It was all the Vogue.
0
victorspoilz 4 days ago +12
He can’t read, so, that’s out.
12
cityspeak 4 days ago +3
Pete’s got a new rap song.
3
kadylady14 4 days ago +3
You mean Hegseth is gonna give us some more slam poetry? If so, I want hell rained down on me first.
3
Beatrenger 4 days ago +4
just bomb me pls
4
Wompatuckrule 4 days ago +2
There's an expression in Farsi that roughly means "bullshit" but translates as "p**** and poetry" so it works in this instance for anything Trump spouts.
2
lostroadrunner22 4 days ago +1
[Amazon.com: The Beautiful Poetry of Donald Trump: 9781786894724: Sears, Rob: Books](https://www.amazon.com/Beautiful-Poetry-Donald-Trump/dp/1786894726?asin=1786894726&revisionId=&format=4&depth=1)
1
Wildfire28669 4 days ago +3
Thank you for destroying my last shred of sanity it was holding me back!
3
Yiffcrusader69 4 days ago +1
By the by my grandmother loved this Christmas gift
1
Uvtha- 4 days ago +35
Christ I hope he tacos out again or the world is gonna be on fire for the next like 5 years at least. People are already struggling, another COVID level economic shock would be a severe disaster.
35
MountainMan17 4 days ago +15
War of attrition. Most non-MAGA can outlast most MAGA, economically. Let it happen. Make those fuckers pay. I'm here for it...
15
OnDrugsTonight 4 days ago +16
I'd be happy to see MAGA pay but not at the cost of any Iranian lives. Or any other human lives for that matter
16
MountainMan17 4 days ago +5
Agree, that's why I said "economically."
5
OnDrugsTonight 4 days ago +2
Yeah, sorry, didn't mean to imply otherwise. But I really hope that for once we can rely on TACO and he doesn't choose this particular hill for the world economy to die on.
2
PubG4YouAndMe 4 days ago +3
Unfortunately they are still blaming Obama and Biden for all the happenings in our country. Even when they admit Trump is what is causing the gas prices to go up, they still end every paragraph with "I still love you and will vote for you a 4th time, but the gas prices I didn't vote for."
3
Uvtha- 4 days ago +1
Poor people are the ones who would pay, unfortunately.
1
MountainMan17 4 days ago +1
And a lot of them - not all - voted for Trump. Many of them love him. You can't protect stupid. Or save it. They will find their fate...
1
Uvtha- 4 days ago +1
...this is a cruel and stupid, and wrong attitude. First of all the people who will suffer most are the Iranians, and the rest of the gulf. After them will be all the poor countries in Asia and the south. The US will suffer too, where not even half of the population voted for Trump, but a lot less than in other places.
1
Photo-70 4 days ago +12
first let the markets tank, than let them drop, so his followers can make a buck or 2 (million)
12
Gopu_17 4 days ago +6
Knowing Trump he will TACO out.
6
[deleted] 4 days ago +3
I don’t think so this time. He can issue orders to kill and not worry about it. His base loves that he is hurting other people It will give him an excuse to use force to get the oil which he will say is making the US money, damn the lost lives it takes to get it
3
sierrabravo1984 4 days ago +6
Waiting for the markets to close, waiting for the markets to open, rinse, lather, repeat.
6
Creative-Painter3911 4 days ago +3
The real question is will it be soft shell or crunchy shell this Tuesday
3
Outrageous_Order_197 4 days ago +6
Isn't that around the same time The USS George HW Bush is set to arrive? If so I'd guess the bombing intensifies.
6
NutsyFlamingo 4 days ago +5
Well threat, bluff, who knows.. but 3 aircraft carrier strike groups is the magic number to go 24/7 Armageddon. You specifically need 3.
5
Ok-Enthusiasm3114 4 days ago +4
100% TACO Tuesday. Trump is a joke.
4
HumanSnotMachine 4 days ago +4
Saving this comment
4
PapaTahm 4 days ago +3
Do what, nuclear? Nope. There is a very simple reason on why no one use Nukes and why only 2 Nukes have ever been used in military operations. It\`s because the other side also has them.
3
AaronPK123 4 days ago +1
I mean, Iran doesn't have them.
1
PapaTahm 4 days ago +3
U.S has tens of Nuclear Submarines capable of launching Nuclear Warheads with Stealth Capabilities. It has shown hostility to China, Europe and Russia (to some lower extension). What do you think would happen if U.S nuked Iran, an Ally of Russia, North Korea and China. You think that would be resolved over some angry letters? Look at Ukraine, why do you think Russia Never used Warheads? What do you think it would happen if Russia Nuked Ukraine, an Ally of France and UK. We don't use Nukes not for some hopeful thinking like "Human Lives" we don't use them because the moment someone uses it, it's a death flag, there are currently 9 nations with the capability of destroying the entire North Hemisphere multiple times.
3
wtg2989 4 days ago +5
I mean, I’m sure there will be more bombs, but Iran has proven it won’t change anything. Basically nothing changes.
5
thepinkblues 4 days ago +25
There will be a marginally increased bombing run that Trump will parade as “most intense bombardment yet”, followed by him saying talks are getting better thanks to his tough love approach. These so called talks will collapse and we will see this exact same headline shortly after
25
Technical_Ideal_5439 4 days ago +2
Im betting on TACO, but with Iran ready to deny any talks and have already publicly said no. I could also seem him actually authorising something which is probably just more bombs.
2
Mistrblank 4 days ago +35
calling his bluff. Can't wait to see trump TACO Tuesday.
35
HappyAmbition706 4 days ago +96
Trump apparently doesn't remember that he unilaterally ended an agreement that Iran was adhering to. Then he bombed them during negotiations, two separate times. Why would they negotiate now, and for what? And his negotiators are two real estate marketers, one being his son-in-law. The definition of pointless empty talk.
96
Wompatuckrule 4 days ago +17
Don't forget that Iran has the upper hand because they can f*** the global oil supply and economy for a good long stretch with minimal effort.
17
Additional_Quiet2600 4 days ago +6
Food supply makes it worse. Chip supply (helium) makes our economy go boom. Done son.
6
Wompatuckrule 4 days ago +10
One of the best descriptions of Trump is "He's a poor man's idea of a rich man, a stupid man's idea of a smart man and a weak man's idea of a strong man." Him f****** with Iran & the Persian Gulf is showing how stupid and weak he is too.
10
classless_classic 4 days ago +8
When you kick a hornets nest, the hornets decide when to stop attacking.
8
PrefersEarlGrey 4 days ago +106
Begging for peace a month into the war you started What a coward
106
moosekin16 4 days ago +45
"It's not our fault folks, they're supposed to surrender, they just won't admit defeat, it's all Iran's fault this war is still going. They're beat, they should give up. Stop asking about the Epstein files."
45
SomeBaldDude2013 4 days ago +20
“They’re not supposed to fight back when you r*** them!” 
20
NearABE 4 days ago +5
Did you mean to write “their daughters”?
5
Sweet-Meaning9874 4 days ago +3
“No one could have predicted they would do this, everyone was surprised!”
3
DistanceToEmpty 4 days ago +47
Trump and co. seem to have missed the fact that the people in charge in Iran fought and survived an eight-year total war with Iraq. We're talking Iraq using chemical weapons, Iranians strapping themselves with explosives to attack tanks, years of trench warfare, the tanker war in the Gulf, and hundreds-of-thousands of Iranian dead. They're not going to roll over because of a month of airstrikes. I wouldn't be at all surprised if Iran wasn't prepared to go a full 12 rounds with US wants and whatever it wants to throw at them.
47
Greener-dayz 4 days ago +14
I’ve seen that sentiment circulating and it’s likely to be true that this regime isn’t going to fall during this conflict without a ground invasion. But a lot of the sentiment out there I feel like completely ignores the technological advancement since Irans war with Iraq. Their airspace is completely dominated by Israel and the US, they can’t come above ground because a stealth bomber will instantly blow them up, their economic facilities and infrastructure is being ruined, and their communication systems are scrambled leading to disarray, and more. That’s not to say I’m disagreeing with you I don’t think this weird “remote war” will topple the regime, but I think we are seeing a new way of warfare take place and people are just ignoring the technology that is being used that could have real unforeseen impact. For all we know this conflict will be the catalyst in their eventual fall post war. I feel like we won’t know the true extent of what’s happen in this for like 3-4 years afterwards. Given the insane amount of propaganda surrounding this conflict.
14
DeciusCurusProbinus 4 days ago +11
The technological advances will confer benefits upon Iran as well. They will defend favorable terrain with ideological fervor and the advantage of numbers. With new tactics made viable by advances in technology, cyber and electronic warfare, US troops will be facing kamikaze and FPV drones, unscrewed ground vehicles, sea drones (unamanned naval platforms), hypersonic missiles and all sorts of other nasty shit that the Iranians have stoved away.
11
calvinee 4 days ago +2
That has nothing to do with the point by the person you replied to. Your argument refers to the benefits during warfare for Iran if the US were to put boots on the ground. The person you replied to is talking about long lasting effects of the war.
2
MountainMan17 4 days ago +15
Our air forces have taken losses not seen since Vietnam. Either our air campaign is being run poorly, or we grossly underestimated the Iranians. I think it's both...
15
Redditor_exe 4 days ago +1
10-15 losses in a month? Compared to the likely 100+ missions being flown every day? It’s not the cleanest campaign ever but it’s probably still in an an average/expected range. We lost more than 10,000 aircraft in Vietnam including helicopters, there’s still a ways to go until we reach that territory
1
calgarspimphand 4 days ago +7
Roughly half of that 10,000 figure was helicopters, which suffered an astonishing casualty rate. We ain't in a ground campaign yet.  A better comparison would be the air force. The USAF lost about 2500 aircraft in total for a loss rate of 0.4 per 1000 sorties flown. You can be sure we've flown thousands of sorties so far over Iran. In the first Gulf War the coalition flew something like 100,000 sorties and lost less and 100 aircraft, which is also comparable to Vietnam. The loss rate in Iran so far might be comparable to Vietnam and the first Gulf War. Vietnam's losses seem huge because of the scale and duration of that war, and really only become staggering if you include helicopters. We're unlikely to deploy helicopters against a well equipped enemy that way ever again.
7
NearABE 4 days ago +1
The war itself is what the regime needed to avoid being toppled. There is no need to specify which regime.
1
myflesh 4 days ago +45
From day 1 Iran has been very clear that they will never do a ceasefire for 3 reasons 1.) America & Israel can not be trusted to follow the ceasefire 2.) America & Israel will use this time to just get stronger. 3.) It will make the actual end of this war even harder and farther out. And they are correct on all 3. Anyone who ever says they are thinking of it has and will continue to be lying to you.
45
MountainMan17 4 days ago +10
This. Additionally, Iran merely has to disrupt to create pressure and force concession. This is what Trump usually does, but now the tables have been turned on him, and he is the one who has to ask Iran to stop doing what they're doing. He's the one who has to figure something out. This is totally foreign to him, and he has no clue how to go about it. He is flailing on the world stage, and I am loving it...
10
vivekadithya12 4 days ago +7
One thing I gotta say is probably most of the world had underestimated Iran here. It also goes to show why previous US administrations never attempted such a catastrophic blunder. Iran understands America totally - that includes Trump, the military and their strengths/weaknesses, attitude, domestic sentiment and culture. Not just at the moment, but everything about America for the last 40 years. The current US administration went into Iran totally unprepared and completely ignorant. Iran holds the intellectual and strategic upper hand. It's remarkable really.
7
ReactionJifs 4 days ago +11
Let them eat TACOS! 🌮🌮🌮🌮
11
just_aguest 4 days ago +10
Can you imagine if Trump drops a nuke after going on about how this whole war was to take nukes off of dangerous countries
10
Additional_Quiet2600 4 days ago +5
I can and it makes me unable to sleep.
5
AaronPK123 4 days ago +2
I'm sitting here seriously wondering if my phone will buzz after school tomorrow with a National Alert. I cannot believe this is reality.
2
CMGCookie 4 days ago +8
If Trump does this, forget about oil. You can kiss the worldwide food chain goodbye.
8
Ornery-Hunter-1417 4 days ago +61
Iran knows this thing that trump wants to get out of war. They don't care. They have fought with Iraq for 10 years and are still developing. They are ready to fight the same as US But being in direct war with the US is always a hell. Us doesn't want to leave its superpower status. Usa can go to any extent
61
Hagelslag_69 4 days ago +87
Superpower status is already gone. Europe, Canada and Australia do not trust the US anymore and the US is in massive debt.
87
DistanceToEmpty 4 days ago +37
This war will be remembered as America's Suez Crisis moment.
37
rhino369 4 days ago +9
Still the only super power. China will be one soon but Russia and Europe are fading.  “Leaders of the free world” is over though. 
9
Max_Rockatanski 4 days ago +33
Europe is building up, cutting ties with USA. Russia is already cooked, Putin cut their own citizens from the rest of the world. China does nothing and is winning. USA is a paper tiger, flailing around in desperate attempts to show power instead of working together with other countries.
33
ExiledCaptain 4 days ago +3
Interesting take, what makes them the ONLY superpower in your opinion ?
3
esquirlo_espianacho 4 days ago +5
The military budget is a good place to start… and the black budgets.
5
_SpaceLord_ 4 days ago +8
That massive military budget seems to be a net negative at the moment. They’re sacrificing trillions of dollars of schools, hospitals, food banks, universities, road infrastructure, scientific research, etc., all in order to… **not** open the Straight, and be humiliated by a fourth-tier power like Iran.
8
LAUNDRINATOR 4 days ago +1
I thought their black budgets were famously undervalued compared to their white ones?
1
ExiledCaptain 4 days ago
The "only" part is what im intererested in more, what makes them a superpower while others arent. From my point of view, ill ofcourse admit that USA is the number1 in that list, but others (at least 3 more) are in there too, and im not even counting a UNITED Europe.
0
rhino369 4 days ago +11
The USA is the only power capable of projecting power anywhere. Russia cannot even fight nextdoor. Europe is too reliant on the USA for any force projection and its too divided. China is definitely an emerging superpower, but they haven't really tried projecting power directly outside their sphere of influence. I view them a bit like the USA in inter-war period of the 20th century. Capable of doing it perhaps but not doing it. China can't really fight a war against Saudi Arabia. The US can bomb Iran. That's the difference.
11
ExiledCaptain 4 days ago +5
Cant or doesnt want? There is a difference in actually projecting the power you have and having the capability to do so. Ill admit that USA is definitely 1st in that list, but dont underestimate China (which is arguably already there and i would go even further and say has been for at least a full decade if not before ). The way you talk about China i would have talked about India, which is also emerging the last decade to become a big player. And even Russia while nowhere near their Soviet Union era power, still have a big sphere of influence (most of the former union states, are allies of Russia). Their invasion/war in Ukraine made it clear ofcourse they are not top dogs, but clearly they have still the power to just invade without second thoughts. About Europe you very correctly mentioned they are all over the place and too reliant on others (on many things too, energy, technology, army, defence capabilities etc) so they are behind in a lot of stuff. They got a wake up call during he 2014 Crimea annexation by Russia, but still even after the full invasion they are reacting way too slow (and reacting is also a problem cause they could take big initiatives for decades now) Thank you for taking the time to reply mate.
5
rhino369 4 days ago +3
Can’t right now, but has the economic and manufacturing potential to eventually build to it.  But building a navy and Air Force capable of that would take decades. Their build up will make them a clear second power to the USA by 2050 when they have 4 carriers. But even then you need bases around the world for the logistics.  They could get pretty damn close to the USA and probably surpass eventually. But that doesn’t seem to be their goal right now. 
3
habitual_viking 4 days ago +2
> Europe is too reliant on the USA for any force projection and its too divided. Or you know, we don't need to project power, but use diplomacy instead. And as orange cheeto has made it abundently clear, the US power projection isn't as powerful as expected.
2
rhino369 4 days ago +2
Good diplomacy doesn’t make you a super power. It just doesn’t. If you want to argue America is misusing its power go head but it’s dumb to deny it exists. 
2
habitual_viking 4 days ago +7
Europe isn't a **weaponized** super power, nor is it a single country. EU as a union is however an economic super power and can project power through trade - and is much more dangerous than old weapons. And as the war in Ukraine and whatever special military operation the US is doing is showing, traditional weapons are almost useless. The US with its massive arsenal hasn't won anything and will soon be forced to withdraw (as usual) from a conflict they had no business in starting.
7
WintersDiminuendo 4 days ago +2
It''s power projection basically. A lot of countries are powerful, but can only project that power in their own region. The US is able to project power - not just bomb, but also land troops basically anywhere they choose to. It might be a terrible idea, but they have the means. Some of this is the number of carriers and the size of the navy they have, but it's also largely because of the network of foward operating bases they've built around the world. Russia can barely project power at the moment, and China's a powerhouse in Asia but doesn't have the logistics to wage a war on the other side of the world. The rest of NATO have some power projection capabilities - remote bases and carriers of their own, but not to the same extent as the US and it only works if all the members are on the same page.
2
bakedNebraska 4 days ago +1
In 1944, during World War II, the term was first applied to the British Empire, the Soviet Union, and the United States.[5] During the Cold War, the British Empire dissolved, leaving the United States and the Soviet Union to dominate world affairs. At the end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the United States became the world's sole superpower,[6][7] a position sometimes referred to as that of a "hyperpower".[8] Since the late 2010s, an increasing amount of proponents have classified China as an emerging superpower, and China is often described as "the only country with enough power to jeopardize the current global order".[9][10][11] In spite of the perceived decline of the United States, it remains a superpower primarily due to its alliances and economic influence, despite power decline and recent international reputation.[12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superpower?wprov=sfla1
1
TinyH1ppo 4 days ago +2
Ukrainians are the leaders of the free world now. China is shaping up to be the new global superpower. US is over under Donald Trump. We blew it.
2
overcooked_biscuit 4 days ago +5
They may not be popular but that doesn't stop them from being a super power. I do like the way we in Europe are moving away from being US centric but we are still heavily reliant on them, especially there tech sector which is why the EU constantly bend over backwards and can't back up their words.
5
Greatsnes 4 days ago +1
Nah, still a super power. You don’t lose it that easily. The weapons and money are all still there along with *some* influence. But definitely don’t lead the world anymore.
1
vossmanspal 4 days ago +7
Trump can bomb until the cows come home but just one man with a portable missile or a drone can hold the straits closed, if they get him there is another hundred thousand waiting to take his place. Trump went in blindly and now he will have to go home and admit defeat, I mean admit that he he’s won and Iran gave in even though now there will be a tariff on every ship that passes safely.
7
Zulmoka531 4 days ago +6
That was a choice speech to give in front of a bunch of kids who were there to collect Easter eggs…
6
Lonely-Corgi-983 4 days ago +5
So amazing that Biden had a better understanding and control of our military than the foolish lunatics and war mongers currently in power.
5
Bobobo-bobobo-bo-bo 4 days ago +6
I wish I could back in time to tell young me there’s no reason to be so scared of a nuclear attack in 1998 because it’s not til 2026 that it starts to seem likely.
6
newmvbergen 4 days ago +6
trump has plenty of new elementary schools to bomb...
6
GreatGojira 4 days ago +11
Trump, "Peace talks are going jitsu the best peace talks. Making real progress! I will extend the deadline for 10 more days! Praise be to Allah!"
11
squirrelpickle 4 days ago +6
Followed by Iran’s response: “Peace talks? We are not aware of any talks ongoing.”
6
beekermc 4 days ago +2
Stock market goes up.
2
Lonely-Corgi-983 4 days ago +3
Oh and why did they leave equipment behind?
3
slimj091 4 days ago +3
The hell that Trump is going to inflict on Iran is that he and his family will be moving to Iran to run for president, and spend all day forcing Iranians to read his internet s\*\*\*postings.
3
Duder57 4 days ago +3
He is going to start a nuclear war isn’t he!?
3
Additional_Quiet2600 4 days ago +1
God I hope not. I'm not a religious man, but the religious psychopaths that run our President want that really bad.
1
Lonely-Corgi-983 4 days ago +2
Trump is a complete and utter idiot , the likes of which we have never seen before.
2
Halftied 4 days ago +2
Holy c***! I thought he said hail. Hail the size of basketballs type hail. C***. He said HELL as in phosphor, lava and brimstone. Now that is an entirely different situation altogether./s
2
Money_Percentage_630 4 days ago +2
Nothing says strength like issuing multiple "final warnings" while begging your former allies to move their boats into waters you are too afraid of publicaly.
2
Adventurous-Tea-876 3 days ago +2
Americans: Do you understand that you’re the bad guys? Or did a lifetime of propaganda convince you that no, it’s the entire rest of the world who is wrong?
2
acityonthemoon 4 days ago +5
Is the TACO deadline tomorrow? Idk when it actually is - today, tomorrow or whenever?
5
HK-53 4 days ago
8pm tomorrow. Supposedly. Technically trump didn’t specify but we are inferring.
0
Aphemia1 4 days ago +3
I hate to say this, but I’m convinced this is going to escalate to a nuclear bomb.
3
Deervember 4 days ago +4
It won't be long before Iran attack America, and it'll all be Trumps fault. 
4
chronoic 4 days ago +18
They don't need to, if they can cause the gulf states to remove America from the middle east, and cause the Gulf states to change payment from the dollar to the Yuan. They will destory the American economy and riots will erupt in America because of inflation and high prices. It will be chaos, you also need to remember Americans have guns, so these riots won't be death free. That's why Trump is losing his mind over the SoH closure, and escalating.
18
De__eB 4 days ago +1
What delusional fantasy fiction are you reading that makes you think the gulf states want to kick the U.S. out. The gulf states have wanted Iran taken out for decades.  It was about to happen a few years ago.  The Saudis and Israelis were going to normalize relations and this was going to happen then.  At a time when Iran had a lot smaller stockpile of missiles and drones. It's the entire reason Iran pushed Hamas to attack Israel.  They knew how Israel would respond and knew the gulf states had to distance themselves from Israel for a while.
1
chronoic 4 days ago +1
Well I did live through a clown getting elected president, and I did live through a bunch of moron believing he wouldn't start a war and I wouldn't put a President admitting to committing War crime on my bingo card too. So anything possible at this point.
1
razzmanfire 4 days ago -4
That's the stupidest thing ive read all day, history has proven time and time again if the people approve of the war America is virtually unbeatable.  Attacking us citizens would give the idiots all the justification to fully invade
-4
Ko_tatsu 4 days ago +2
When was the last time an american ground invasion went as expected?
2
GatorNator83 4 days ago +2
Yet tomorrow he’ll claim that the negotiations are going better than expected, so deadline can be extended by two weeks
2
pete_68 4 days ago +1
Well, if they don't meet his ultimatum by Thursday, or maybe Friday, there are going to be real consequences. /s
1
Additional_Quiet2600 4 days ago +1
According to him it's Tuesday 8pm EST.
1
zeta_cartel_CFO 4 days ago +1
Trump is in a tough spot here. Every option has a potential of going wrong. At this point, the best thing for him is to just go TACO and hoping the world breathing a sigh of relief might overlook him chickening out.
1
Additional_Quiet2600 4 days ago +2
He has tripled down. I don't think he TACOs this one. We are in massive trouble.
2
markt- 4 days ago +1
Really? Gosh, I wonder whoever could’ve predicted that kind of response. /S
1
King_Fisher99 4 days ago +1
Tomorrow is TACO Tuesday
1
Icy_Tune2834 4 days ago +2
TACO ,Taco Man , I want to be a Taco man , MAGA Christians and Cholesterol is a helluva drug .
2
a_shootin_star 4 days ago +1
He just said the whole country of Iran could be wiped in one night...
1
loveiseverything 4 days ago +1
Nukes. 
1
Yesterday622 4 days ago +1
I see another taco 🌮 coming
1
← Back to Board