> Iran has rejected taking part in the second round of talks with the United States, the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA), Iran’s official state news agency, reported on Sunday.
>IRNA's report said “US excessive demands and unreasonable, unrealistic requests, repeated changes in positions, continued contradictory statements” had so far prevented progress in the negotiations.
>It added that “the continuation of the so-called naval blockade, which is considered a violation of the ceasefire understanding, along with threatening rhetoric” had also hindered talks.
>“Under these conditions, no clear prospect for productive talks is envisaged,” IRNA said.
1077
you_killed_my_6 days ago
+1043
It's so f****** ridiculous how any reasonable person has no choice but to agree with Iran in this limited capacity.
What is the point of negotiating with Trump when his words mean ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
1043
Gadshill6 days ago
+334
He literally took out Iran’s top leadership during the last round of negotiations.
334
Yvaelle6 days ago
+239
And that's a pattern of behaviour too, because USA asked Iraq to mediate peace talks with Iran in 2020, and when Iran sent their top general to the peace talks, USA called drone strikes on General Soleimani and his entire convoy. During Trump's first term.
239
Stockengineer6 days ago
+66
Twice… it’s nuts they’d tried to meet or travel
66
Black_Moons5 days ago
+16
Especially when they could just negotiate over a zoom meeting just as effectively. (Aka: 0 effectiveness)
16
Phrecki5 days ago
+2
The meeting that could have been an email /s or not
2
restore_democracy6 days ago
+6
And yet they have more stable and cohesive leadership than the US.
6
FanOpening30745 days ago
+1
aka killed/executed
1
McortezLSU6 days ago
+40
Trumponomics 101: I win you lose, you beg i gloat.
He just cant help himself, late stage psychopath manchild that has never faced any sort of consequences.
40
pppiddypants5 days ago
+2
More like, I lose, but you lose a little more, which lets me say that I “won” (until I piss off enough people to actually start de-dollarizing and de-coupling).
2
TheKokujin5 days ago
+2
Trumponomics 101: I win, you lose, I lose, but say i win, you lose more.
2
DexJedi6 days ago
+56
Absolutely. And we are talking about a really terrible regime. Total scum! (I'm talking about Iran)
And yet THEY are sounding like the reasonable ones here.
56
hedoeswhathewants5 days ago
+27
That's the thing, it's not like Trump started this for the good of the Iranian people. He couldn't care less if the "new" government keeps on murdering its people.
So then what is this about? Who f*** knows, but it's surely nothing that will benefit any normal people.
27
space_age_stuff5 days ago
+9
It’s about making as much money as possible. Every week, they sell stock positions, get aggressive, tank the market, then buy them back for c****. Then by the weekend we have “peace talks”, and the market picks back up. Then rinse and repeat.
9
Tuesday_6PM4 days ago
+3
It’s wild, though, that Wall Street seems to keep falling for it. Are all these investors and portfolio managers asleep at the wheel?
3
Sadiebb5 days ago
+1
Ask Israel…
1
Stockengineer6 days ago
+25
The ceasefire required isreal to stop (they launched the biggest surprise attack like 6 hr later)
Then they do a stupid blockade 😂, so they couldn’t even de-escalate during negotiations. Why would they till us capitulates something
25
badass_panda5 days ago
+1
>
The ceasefire required isreal to stop (they launched the biggest surprise attack like 6 hr later)
To stop attacking *Iran*... Israel never agreed to stop attacking Hezbollah (in Lebanon), and it's telling that all of a sudden Iran is admitting that Hezbollah is theirs.
1
Stockengineer5 days ago
+6
Pakistan even said it was agreed, ceasefire in Lebanon…
6
badass_panda5 days ago
-3
Pakistan *even* said it was agreed? Unbiased, famously neutral Pakistan? Okay I'm convinced!
But for real, Lebanon and Israel said it wasn't, and they arrived at a ceasefire two days ago.
-3
Abbx6 days ago
+17
To be fair they're not worth negotiating with anyway. Not that Trump is either, given his daily schizo behavior, but even if it weren't Trump and a more sane man, the Islamic Republic isn't worth negotiating with.
Their words don't mean anything either. It's a battle of bullshit between Trump and them. They don't allow their people to vote for anything beyond a puppet president who has no power so it's all charades. All state media and news is controlled by the government. Their internet has been in blackout for 51 days and counting. They imprison and execute people daily. Meanwhile they supply the middle east terror groups and would continue to even if "negotiated with". They'd continue to do all these things even if negotiated with lol. They will not change even one of these behaviors for anything in return.
Pretty sure their version of reasonable would be to exit Iran, leave their uranium alone, leave the strait alone and accept fees, repay damages, and make a public apology while spending years condoning for the US's mistakes. In return, they'd continue chanting "Death to America" in their mosques.
17
fudgemental6 days ago
+26
Negotiations in war exist because neither sides want the military exchange to be a zero-sum game. It's just another battlefield, complete with the bullshitting, threats, posturing, and a clear w***** and a loser. Except when one side continues to keep tossing the table and yelling "f*** this" to everyones faces and then doing exactly what they shouldn't be, even if that means shooting themselves in the foot. Iran is clearly a hellscape for its people, but now it has the wherewithal and the excuse to make the world more of a shithole out of spite. Successful negotiations with a state like this would've been clear messaging to the country to leave the strait alone or we deploy some further escalation of hostilities, or that here is are our terms, now lets negotiate what you want in return to accept those terms, or something along those f****** lines.
Except we've got world leaders enacting a plot out of Dr. Horrible's Sing-along Blog.
26
M2D26 days ago
+33
Well, Biden as vice president negotiated the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and Iran was holding up their end of the bargain. It wasn’t until Trump withdrew from the agreement that they ramped up their nuclear capabilities. So it can be done. It wasn’t difficult but it happened. But Trump didn’t like it.
33
big_troublemaker6 days ago
+2
Well, us has an almighty president who wishes to be able to do another term, and us is jailing, deporting and killing unwanted people too...
But seriously, what you described as Irans expectations, sounds like reasonable ones. Why would they want anything else? Also supposedly their nuclear program has been obliterated by Trump.
At the moment they control negotiations and hold all the cards, and trump is randomly flailing like an idiot.
2
Abbx6 days ago
+2
> Why would they want anything else?
It's the "without anything in return" part. Wanting those things from their perspective makes perfect sense. It's unreasonable to expect that given the current circumstances of war that both US and Israel say "Sure!" and just do that with nothing in return.
Trump is flailing, which is why we've been in this bounce for weeks now. At the same time, the IR has been fragmented and their leadership has been arguing amongst one another. Feels like the damage done has fragmented them severely, when we get conflicting reports of he said he said. Dunno how this will turn over. More attacks and threats I guess.
Also, as someone with connections to Iran, while Trump is "doing those things" make no mistake it is not comparable to the IR's crimes. Trump bad sure, but he cannot in his lifetime ever accomplish what the IR has done.
2
big_troublemaker5 days ago
+1
I'm sure Trump will try his best. Anyway, IR crimes are a separate thing, and neither Israel nor Trump's has not done anything to improve a situation of an average person.
Apparently analyst reports were clear about the chance of outcome of attack on Iran being Iranian regime collapsing as very unlikely, and that's exactly what happened. Now Trump is in a pickle with zero idea on how to progress, and the only realistic direction is to offer financial support (that will strengthen Iranian regime) and quietly back out, HOPING that Iran will not carry on keeping Hormuz hostage (which they ARE).
Also, current situation in Iran is, as it happens, at least partially a fault of US... Western countries never learn that meddling elsewhere has great chance of going completely wrong.
1
Ferelwing5 days ago
+2
Which is why everyone else in the world is going to continue to watch this nightmare with growing fury at the two countries who *chose* to start this fight without basic understanding of what the likely outcomes would be.
Israel and the USA started a war causing this mess and have now made the situation that much worse for the entire globe but instead of recognizing this is a situation that they need to get themselves out of they're doubling down and dragging everyone else with them.
Iran wasn't putting tolls on the Strait until the US and Israel decided to bomb them. It's a war of choice that *everyone* is now suffering because of those two countries, and Iran knows they currently have the better strategy. Anyone who understands geography and wars realizes that what Iran is doing now was absolutely a possibility if they were attacked which is why *no one in their right minds would have done it*. The USA and Israel seem to be under the assumption if it gets bad enough everyone else will have to come in and "help them fix this" but it could completely backfire where everyone else decides to refuse to deal with either country instead.
While I do not want to be on the side of Iran, Israel and the US are making it extremely difficult not to side with Iran.
2
RobaDubDub5 days ago
+1
Isn't it telling all these people defending a country they would never , ever choose to live in
1
barath_s5 days ago
+1
> Their internet has been in blackout for 51 days and counting
They have a domestic internet. But the international internet has been blacked out and restricted to whitelisted officials/organizations ... There are some loosening of this now with profs getting some access.
https://sundayguardianlive.com/world/iran-to-restore-internet-access-amid-prolonged-nationwide-blackout-why-is-the-internet-shut-down-and-why-are-professors-getting-selective-access-185281/
1
PotatoTyranny5 days ago
+1
A country doesn't need to allow voting to be trustworthy, only to keep their word and not constantly backstab you during live negotiations. We know for a fact that they followed JCPOA to the letter, even after the US withdrew.
1
[deleted]6 days ago
+43
[deleted]
43
Millgy6 days ago
+13
Because they’ve been militarily defeated and ostensibly value the lives and material wellbeing of their people. The same reason Japan surrendered unconditionally after two nuclear bombs were dropped.
That’s the trick though, Iran’s leaders do not value the lives or wellbeing of their citizens, or even of themselves. Death by jihad is a far nobler calling to them, making them an irrational actor by our standards.
Being an irrational actor is why they aren’t trusted to have a nuclear weapons program, but it is also why they can’t be defeated in anything less than a war of annihilation. The cost of which would be ruinous to the US, the region, and the world.
Whatever decision Trump makes now will be the wrong one. He simply bit off more than he could chew.
13
yourgirl6969696 days ago
+23
Stuck in the escalation trap. Precisely why no other president wanted to do it
23
cogman105 days ago
+22
> Because they’ve been militarily defeated
Have they been?
Iran has continued a steady pace of drone and missile launches that only stopped with a ceasefire agreement.
That's how Iran can close the straight in the first place, they still have military power that's not been defeated.
> Being an irrational actor is why they aren’t trusted to have a nuclear weapons program
Iran has been behaving very rationally. That is the primary reason Israel and the US have no support for this war. It's the reason US allies in the region are second guessing their relationship with the US.
The irrational act was bombing instead of the ongoing negotiations which included peaceful monitoring of the nuclear program and 0 stockpile.
The US and Israel threatening nuclear strikes and bombing power plants and civilian infrastructure is the irrational move. All because they've lost control. They can't bomb their way to victory (whatever that is).
22
JE10125 days ago
+9
>but it is also why they can’t be defeated in anything less than a war of annihilation. The cost of which would be ruinous to the US, the region, and the world.
Thing is Iran is a real country, collapse their economy and they lose the ability to pay their soldiers, lose the ability to maintain their infrastructure, can't buy or build weapons etc... eventually the whole thing crumbles and the regime loses its hold on the country.
9
Ferelwing5 days ago
+8
And yet because they are valuable allies to North Korea, China and Russia that's going to be exceptionally difficult for the USA to pull off after all, their economy doesn't rely on the usual networks that the USA uses to control things, they've been embargoed for several decades now. They're already having difficulty paying their average citizens but their soldiers are religious zealots who already get paid more than the average civilian, this means it's nearly impossible to topple them because without the regime they lose their status.
8
JE10125 days ago
+3
Russia pretty much abandoned Iran, NK is a non factor and the trade with China (mainly oil) is shut down because of the US blockade.
A naval blockade can absolutely collapse the Iranian economy
3
wil6erness5 days ago
+3
And it'll only take 20-30 years! Super c**** and easy
3
MrPierson5 days ago
+1
>eventually the whole thing crumbles and the regime loses its hold on the country
And then what? As long as there exists a group in Iran that can blow up an oil tanker every two weeks, the strait stays closed.
1
Black_Moons5 days ago
+5
>Being an irrational actor is why they aren’t trusted to have a nuclear weapons program
Agreed, the USA shouldn't be allowed to have nukes anymore.
5
MakePhreciaCore5 days ago
+1
I’m sorry? By your own admission when do we take nukes away from the yellow pedo? The absolute most irrational actor to ever act on the world stage.
1
1Pac2Pac3Pac55 days ago
+3
They're a bunch of murderous assholes who kill their own civilian protestors, but I will admit whoever is writing these statements is very eloquent
3
Public-Position77116 days ago
+1
I need to see this from a major news network.
1
Gadshill6 days ago
+3
Phil Stewart from Reuters reporting on his X.
3
smoothtrip5 days ago
+1
>"US excessive demands and unreasonable, unrealistic requests, repeated changes in positions, continued contradictory statements”
Bro, that is how they run their country too. It is like breathing to them.
1
shunyaananda5 days ago
+1
I find it funny that even terrorists make more sense than the current american administration
1
hunterman3216 days ago
+284
But Trump said we won the war.
284
adilfc6 days ago
+75
I don't think by 'we' he meant USA
75
x3nhydr4lutr1sx6 days ago
+17
That's the point. Why win the war only once when you can win the war once every week. That's 52 wins in a year.
17
Flankdiesel6 days ago
+12
Hold up he's going to end 52 wars in one year that certainly will win him the peace prize
12
frontfrontdowndown5 days ago
+4
Suck it FIFA haters
4
pet_dander6 days ago
+41
Just like he won the 2020 election
41
p_29236 days ago
+6
Do not believe your eyes and ears, only what you are told.
6
ATarrificHeadache6 days ago
+10
Trump also said they had completely destroyed their navy but somehow magical Iranian gunboats formed out of nowhere to fire on the ships in the strait
10
APoisonousMushroom6 days ago
+15
i’m starting to think this Trump guy might not be entirely honest.
15
Stockengineer6 days ago
+2
Just ignore it and don’t count. All good 👍🏼
2
MaxPower915756 days ago
+61
someone is about to throw a tantrum
61
tranquilrage735 days ago
+13
Hide the hamburgers and ketchup.
13
Royal-Hunter38926 days ago
+205
This war never had a easy exit for US, and now it's stuck trying to play "talks" hoping the other side to blink under pressure.
Trump don't want to admit that the only way out is it's either go all the way in , pay a price and try to win
OR , fu*k off, take the L and save potential casualties and try winning through media propoganda the way Iran is doing . Despite taking losses, Iran is projecting a win through media warfare and they are actually able to deliver their story accross the world unlike US .
205
shortyman9206 days ago
+25
There's also nothing stopping the US from just sitting there in the strait while Europe and Asia are desperate for oil and shipping. Those two regions are going to need to intervene sooner than the US needs to leave the area and that's going to throw new dynamics into this that might actually pressure Iran or US in other ways to get them to actually agree on something.
25
U-2356 days ago
+74
The strait being closed indefinitely would cause a worldwide recession that would definitely include the US. We're not far from that happening even if the strait reopens very soon.
74
AdultContemporaneous5 days ago
+5
So what I'm hearing is that if a global recession is artificially created, wealthy people can swoop in an buy up entities that are going bankrupt due to this, at a fraction of the value? Well, shit. Speed it up, boys.
5
Kladeradatschi6 days ago
+36
Oil price is global unless Trump wants to force US oil companies to sell c**** into the domestic market instead of exporting (nationalization? Little bit of communism in the US?) So for now the world sits in the same boat and we all saw, who poked holes into it to distract from the US Gov being run by pedophiles.
36
Asleep-Waltz26815 days ago
+2
What makes you think the intervention would be directed militarily vs. Iran and not plitically vs. the US?
The Europeans would get a massive lashback from their population if they were to start a war not to mention that most countries don't have a navy that would be able to do anything significant in the Gulf of Oman. Some would also argue that going to war with Iran would create security risks as the tentions with Russia rise.
2
foghillgal6 days ago
+2
Going all in would require congress to actually do something, budget, sign on, etc. Even them know that would be completely suicidal so they're stuck.
2
Stockengineer6 days ago
-7
I’m loving this, that he is actually getting held accountable 😂
-7
spatenfloot6 days ago
+22
no he isn't. it's just annoying for him
22
Darkone5396 days ago
+96
The problem is America attacked in the middle of the last talks so there's zero trust. Add in that Trump is basically demanding a surrender and of course they aren't going anywhere.
Everyone could see this. Trump is either going to have to put boots on the ground or actually negotiate with the understanding America hasn't won anything.
This whole thing has echo's of Putin's "three day" operation.
96
joebojax6 days ago
+57
We murdered solemani under pretense of peace talks
We murdered the entire nuclear physicist top brass under pretense of peace deal negotiations
Same with the other leaders of Iran
We sank a boat immediately after a peaceful international training exercise
We have practically killed so many of the leadership there isn't a clear sense of who is able to fully represent that nation anymore
I don't think there is any sincere belief in peace on either side and Israel started the war it doesn't really matter if usa wants peace when the folks who started the war want to continue.
57
Larcye5 days ago
+17
>We have practically killed so many of the leadership there isn't a clear sense of who is able to fully represent that nation anymore
Well we know who is in charge now. the IRGC. We put the hardliners of Iran into power and basically killed anyone who was close to being a moderate who might want to actually work with us. 400IQ move according to the MAGA morons.
17
No-Space9375 days ago
+10
> We murdered solemani under pretense of peace talks
Is that what people are going with now? FYI he was there ostensibly for Saudi-Iranian talks, not US-Iranian talks as i've seen mentioned elsewhere, the only person claiming that was the Iraqi PM a staunch Iranian supporter. Most countries also send you know, diplomats on a diplomatic mission, not the guy who's job it is to set up foreign backed militias in the sovereign territory of other countries, but hey! What do I know, peace mission it is!
> We sank a boat immediately after a peaceful international training exercise
C'mon, people are still going on with this one too? The war was already started (please no comments about usage of "war" no one likes arguing semantics) It had any opportunity to go to port in India, there is no indication that it was unarmed and it was traveling back towards the conflict zone where US ships were situated. This is cut and dry.
> We have practically killed so many of the leadership there isn't a clear sense of who is able to fully represent that nation anymore
It's funny, usually people talk about how it's the leaders who get off easy in war, and civilians pay the price, here it is the opposite and people still find faults with it. The leaders of Iran, especially the IRGC are terrible Human beings, at the top of a Terrible organization, if there is infighting happening all this serves is to weaken the regime. I don't know what people here expect. It took 3 years to sign the JCPOA, this conflict isn't going to end over a weekend. Reactionary listnookors just love jumping headline to headline and providing the most doomer outlook on each one.
It is more than likely going to go kinetic again before resolution and we are still weeks away from the blockade starting to apply serious pressure. Buckle in folks, and stop reacting to headlines.
10
just_a_guy_named16816 days ago
+311
Who knew bombing a country while in between negotiations leads to consequences
311
gentlegreengiant6 days ago
+74
Israel for one - hence why they are killing two bird with one stone by sending the US into a long prolonged conflict for "reasons".
74
HugsForUpvotes6 days ago
+65
I don't understand why Leftists are so quick to let Republicans scapegoat Israel for the war. Obviously Netanyahu wanted this, but he has wanted this for several administration. Trump and the Republicans had all the power and responsibility to say no, and they chose this.
They need to own that. Preferably by losing midterms.
65
Jugaimo6 days ago
+27
The status quo for decades had been letting Israel and Iran toss missiles at one another. Whenever things got a little heated, the US and Iran would bomb some inconsequential patch of dirt near a military base and call it a day.
But then Trump ruined it by getting us involved and taking too strong of a direct action. Now we’re in this mess and have no way to cleanly pull out.
27
Threecatproblem5 days ago
+8
Ummmm...how did "Leftists" enter this conversation? The Talipublicans control all of our government, so how is it that, somehow, you blame Leftists for letting it happen?
8
just_a_guy_named16815 days ago
+2
And didn't saudi pressure Trump to join the war too
2
CrazyEntertainment866 days ago
+5
Preferably by being removed from office, the entire cabinet, then tried for war crimes, knowingly murdering innocent children.
5
StrikeNo71196 days ago
+1
Bombing them to the stone ages btw...
1
Worst_Comment_Evar6 days ago
+41
So was Trump's line about them agreeing to buy the uranium from Iran a lie?
41
Steveslastventure6 days ago
+32
According to Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister, [yup](https://apnews.com/article/iran-deputy-foreign-minister-interview-40d8e43e3c7b5a23cda6783b064b9dbf)
>“I can tell you that no enriched material is going to be shipped to United States,” Khatibzadeh said. “This is non-starter and I can assure you that while we are ready to address any concerns that we do have, we’re not going to accept things that are nonstarters.”
32
spatenfloot6 days ago
+38
everything he says is a lie
38
Mavolitic6 days ago
+17
Every SINGLE thing Trump says is a lie, it’s just constant.
17
PrefersEarlGrey6 days ago
+56
Iran: Okay, we'll open the strait.
Trump: we are still blockading all Iranian ports, also all Uraniums will die unless they agree to a nuclear deal like the one I tore up in 2018
56
this_dudeagain5 days ago
+1
I think Uraniums are on Earth 42
1
ZasdfUnreal6 days ago
+13
I’m beginning to get the impression that they only agreed to talks to get their weapons shipments from China. The US blockade ruined their plans. So the talks are done.
13
Chemical_Scholar_7535 days ago
+11
I doubt it. Probably they were hoping the US would blink with high oil prices and they thought they could negotiate an acceptable settlement. It sounds like they want to give up their nuclear ambitions for 10 years in exchange for keeping their proxy militant groups and sanctions relief. The US seems to be set on a deal which permanently shutters their nuclear ambitions (which is mostly a problem because it’s humiliating for Iran’s government) and likely deals with their proxy groups without granting the sanctions relief Iran wants.
They probably hoping that by making it clear they will drag the conflict out, the US is forced back to the negotiating table.
11
rightoftexas5 days ago
+3
With the US blockade it will get hard for Iran to hold out quickly. They'll run out of cash and their economy will tank.
3
Chemical_Scholar_7535 days ago
+7
Yes, this is brinkmanship. Iran’s economy will struggle much more than the American economy but Americans are much more sensitive to relatively minor economic headwinds and American politicians must be sensitive to the electorate.
7
MrWFL5 days ago
+2
I keep reading this online. European/US people are much more sensitive. But Europe wethered the Ukraine war with big financial pain seemingly fine. Meanwhile the rest of the world seem full of revolutions. Democracy acts as a pressure relief valve for pain. Alot of other countries just have oppression as pressure relief.
2
Chemical_Scholar_7535 days ago
+6
Yes, the US is unlikely to overthrow the government. But that pressure relief valve is what Iran is counting on. Trump doesn’t want to lose the elections (midterms in this case) and if oil prices are high he likely will lose them by more so Iran knows he has a strong incentive to lower oil prices as quickly as possible. Democracy is (part of) what we mean when we say that western countries are more sensitive because the leaders have to care more about the harm they inflict on their citizens. Meanwhile in Iran the economy is falling apart, but there’s no mechanism by which citizen who want cheaper food and more employment can stop the government from focusing on proxy militant groups, a nuclear program and it’s only foreign policy aims. Also, westerners tend to be wealthy (if you make 32k annually you are in the top 1% globally) and have a lot to lose while Iranians are already used to a poor economic situation.
6
barath_s5 days ago
+2
> which is mostly a problem because it’s humiliating for Iran’s government
The other problem is that at this point, it is unclear if anything other than a nuclear bomb and delivery mechanism provides any security mechanism for Iran to not be bombed/struck again.
2
SnooChickens15346 days ago
+46
Could you blame them . They know America aren't taking these talks seriously by sending Dumb and Dumber (Kushner & Witkoff)
46
RODjij6 days ago
+11
What are the chances Iran pump and dumps US markets again next week with false openings so it wrecks Trump's friends stocks & options.
11
the_forgotten_tb466 days ago
+16
They said the same thing last time
16
Lovv6 days ago
+14
Yeah and they rejected the US's offer.
14
molokoplusone6 days ago
+12
No shit, why would they bother talk to us? They know negotiation is completely pointless when we’re not true to our word and immediately violate every deal. You can’t trust anything Trump ever says
12
this_dudeagain5 days ago
+3
They're likely talking to the US through back channels but both parties are putting on a front publicly.
3
No-Space9375 days ago
+6
This, and this has been happening since the outset of hostilities. It is so funny watching people on this site jump headline to headline taking it completely at face value. Like the idea of posturing is a foreign concept here.
The Hormuz situation is good example. Like stop reading tweets, and start watching ship tracking. Are there no boats going through? Then ignore whatever the headline stated.
6
84Cressida6 days ago
+15
Iran denied they’d have any talks with the US before, Listnook ate it up, and lo and behold, it was all bullshit propaganda because Iran has been negotiating all along.
15
cjh426895 days ago
+2
Thanks Charmander!
2
tayswampflorida5 days ago
+5
Who blames them, im surprised anyone talks with us about anything anymore.
5
donkeybrainamerican5 days ago
+2
Wonder what this is going to do to the admin's call options.
2
KenUsimi5 days ago
+4
Quell surprise. It’s almost like they don’t trust us.
4
I_R0M_I6 days ago
+16
F****** crazy when Iran sounds like the reasonable country 😂
16
Kufangar6 days ago
+5
Can't wait for the next Lego diss movie.
5
not_old_redditor6 days ago
+6
Sure doesn't seem like Trump holds all the cards.
6
[deleted]6 days ago
+3
[deleted]
3
CampEmbarrassed1706 days ago
+2
“Pakistein”!! Lol. Well you don’t a private Epstein island when the Pakistani high courts has repeatedly made it legal to forcibly abduct, convert and “marry” 12 year old non-Muslim children. No wonder Trumpanzee wants to visit Islamabad so bad.
2
lonigus6 days ago
+3
This has become a narrative war of propaganda on both sides. Bottom line is, that Trump gave Iran a weapon Iran would have never dreamt of a year ago... And thats a chokehold on the straight of Hormuz. Trump can say that USA doesnt need the oil from there, but USAs biggest ponzi scheme in the worlds history is BUILD on the petrol dollar comming from there. If the GCC states stoped using the petrol dollas and switched to the chinese yuan it would devastate the US economy.
Even if Trump fucks off from the region its gonna be the GCC states that have to deal with Iran because while Trump leaves, Iran isnt going anywhere. What is left is an Iran that can at any time decide to close the straight and GCC states cant do jackshit about it.
3
Boys4Ever6 days ago
+1
This is like the karate kid. Talks on. Talks off.
1
tip8716 days ago
+1
A few hours of joy, everything is fine. Then the crash and the disillusionment. It's reminiscent of drug use or manic depression. You almost go crazy yourself if you have to watch that regularly, again and again and again..
1
HistoryVibesCanJive6 days ago
+2
For those of us getting directly impacted as we have to work around the clock due to this. Talk about another blow. Morale is low among many. I'm optimistic from a work standpoint, but my colleagues are really being worn down.
2
fitxa66 days ago
+2
That sucks. What kind of work if you don’t mind sharing?
2
HistoryVibesCanJive6 days ago
+8
Direct policy infrastructure . Basically, we have to figure out ways to make sure the pain isn't felt in logistics. Pretty much, the best way to digest this in the everyday - the reason why prices aren't over 10 dollars at the pump, and a total fracture hasn't occurred, is because there are groups working around the clock so that doesn't happen.
I really wish I could say that people can keep going. But this has hit my org super hard. We already had stay over the weekend - again - and it's hitting us we have to work even harder now.
8
PrairieScott6 days ago
$1 bn US to have that fleet there every single day.
0
LateralEntry6 days ago
+12
I don’t see how that’s possible. The ships are just sitting in the water, if they weren’t there they’d be somewhere else.
12
Adept-Read-75296 days ago
+5
Just off the cuff - Ten of thousands of people on combat pay, Boats moving around on patrols (not in port). Launching crazy expensive flights 24/7 from 3 carriers and land. Astronomical fuel bills and wear on all of the equipment… etc.
5
LateralEntry6 days ago
+2
All of those would be largely true if they were somewhere else. Combat pay is like $225/month and many places qualify.
2
wompical6 days ago
+23
This is true but also the fleet is going to be somewhere doing something. As long as they aren't shooting they are spending a similar amount as they would be anywhere else.
23
dug-ac6 days ago
+5
Are the troops not getting paid for combat zone deployment?
5
wompical6 days ago
+9
They might be but that is only a tiny bit of the cost of the fleet.
9
mpsteidle6 days ago
+4
Id rather my tax dollar go to the troops then some account to be dumped on lobster at the end of the year.
4
FlyEaglesFlyauggie6 days ago
+4
Ships dock at Navy Yards for very long periods.
4
wompical6 days ago
+5
They can yea. But ships are meant to go to sea. These ships wouldn't be at dock if they weren't in the middle east.
5
Ok-Fruit-22526 days ago
+1
True the CSG would be somewhere but it damn sure wouldn't be costing a this much. You should know that
1
wompical6 days ago
+3
How much would it be costing? Where are the savings?
3
this_dudeagain5 days ago
+1
It was the bombing campaign that was costing all that money. The Navy would be out to sea regardless. Use a little logic before posting.
1
PrairieScott5 days ago
+2
Not just operating costs. Lost assets. Lost bases. This is catastrophic for the US.
2
this_dudeagain5 days ago
+1
It's really not at least not yet.
1
royxsong6 days ago
+1
They want Vance who can end everything
1
DrunkOtters6 days ago
+1
Seems to me it's time to heavily invest in Venezuelan oil /s
1
StupendousMan19955 days ago
+1
Must be Sunday.
1
Dark_World_Blues5 days ago
+1
Iran's officials said they won't negotiate with USA unless there was a ceasefire in Lebanon 2 weeks ago, there wasn't a ceasefire in Lebanon and they still went for the negotiations.
Either they're lying, or there is no control over their officials.
135 Comments