Iran restricts Strait of Hormuz as Israel attacks Lebanon

Lebanon's government is not a belligerent unless it's actively fighting back (i.e. striking Israeli forces). It doesn't have to be present for Israel to agree not to bomb Lebanese territory, and even if it is, it has nothing to sign because it would just continue doing what it's already doing. Hezbollah would be such a belligerent, but it's likely Iran can speak on their behalf as proxy.

It doesn't work like that, usually countries have an understanding that waits for 24 hrs for things to calm down.

Again, it's literally in their requirements for the agreement. That was the deal yesterday.  We want the Strait open?  Ceasefire, including Lebanon. It was written down and communicated through Pakistan as the negotiator, you can't claim this wasn't the deal.  We literally had it communicated through a 3rd party that is the ONLY way they are willing to speak to us now. If we didn't agree, then we should have rejected the ceasefire.  TACO Donny got calls from people of wealth and world leaders thoigh, which righfully pointed out the severe damage to the world and economy (and his GOP) that attacking civilian power plants and bridges would cause.  I'm obviously glad he backed down, but he shouldn't make such boisterous and dangerous threats (that are also war crimes) if he wasn't going to act. It's very obvious Iran was willing to go past the line he drew in the sand, but that he wasn't actually willing to commit because it's going to f*** the entire world.  That's why you don't MAKE such threats, beyond the "being war crimes" part;  If you back down, you look the fool. Well, Iran gave him a way out, and it was a 10 point ceasefire plan through Pakistan.  If we aren't going to agree, there's no reason they should keep the Strait open.  That includes Israel, as Iran isn't going to be content with giving up their Strait bargaining chip if another country is still attacking them their allies. It falls on us to now either declare the ceasefire over, or pressure Israel to stop.  Only the second option opens the Strait.

Except lebanon was part of the agreement...

No, Iran *attacked*.  Past tense, with those missiles hitting within literally minutes of the ceasefire, and everyone involved understanding they were already launched. Expecting operations that are purposefully decentralized to cease instantly is... Well, that's madness. An hour later? Sure.  But those happened within 10 minutes of the ceasefire. Have they continued?  No.  They haven't. Has Israel said Iran broke the ceasefire and it's off?  Has the US? No.  They haven't. You're arguing Iran broke a ceasefire in a way that the leaders of the involved nations *aren't*.  You're gaining nothing dying on this hill, they aren't standing with you.

Their claims are mutually incompatible, so accepting either as fact is passing judgment on the other.

It's a quote from Netanyahu. That doesn't exactly qualify as an impartial source, given Netanyahu's government is the one that bombed Lebanon after the agreement.