whatever it is — we know for sure Russians/Chinese helped them. Yet, Hegseth said it wasn’t a big deal.
1151
sask3576 days ago
+464
Hegseth also called for no quarter. I haven't seen anyone talking about that. Would that apply if Iran captures the downed US aircrew?
464
Scottz0rz6 days ago
+354
Please be fair to Pete, he actually doesn't know what that phrase means, he just saw it in a movie and thought it sounded cool when he wrote his speech with the help of ChatGPT.
354
KingR3aper6 days ago
+88
FAFO, with our brand new cutting edge anti-woke military. It's not a war – it's an excursion! Check the bio for details!
88
Evilmoustachetwirler6 days ago
+28
Don't forget to like and subscribe, hit the bell icon to be one of the first to know what we f*** up next!
28
EmergencyCucumber9056 days ago
+7
DESTROY THAT LIKE BUTTON
7
Vel2506 days ago
+3
Man South Park really foreshadowed this whole event with the hegseth episode.
3
DE4DM4NSH4ND5 days ago
+3
They have been sobright so many times its actually sad. Like hiw could we let the world turn into an episode of south park?
3
MareC0gnitum6 days ago
+17
He beat Margit in Elden Ring and he really liked the line:
>*The hands of the Fell Omen shall brook thee no* ***quarter****.*
17
Jeffe5086 days ago
+31
No way he is smart or sober enough to beat a Elden Ring boss.
31
Not_The_Real_Odin6 days ago
+8
How'd he fair against Epstein Ring bosses?
8
Accidental_Ballyhoo6 days ago
+3
SPOILER !!!!
j/k I’ll never beat Margit.
3
CryptoThroway82056 days ago
+3
Do you think he has a career in rap poetry if this Secretary of War (I think it's more appropriate than defense) thing doesn't work out?
3
jmcgil46846 days ago
+3
It’s a Led Zepplin album. He rocks it why drinking his whisky
3
yamsyamsya6 days ago
+3
He is a big fan of zep
3
Spicypewpew6 days ago
+2
See you in Valhalla was taken already
2
lebennaia6 days ago
+155
Ordering no quarter is a warcrime. I hope Hegseth one day has to answer for it in court.
155
lost124876 days ago
+32
I think the guy is literally just saying things to sound "badass." What does "no quarter" even mean in a war where you're just dropping bombs on stuff? There will never be a scenario where there is anyone to capture anyway.
32
Ramlavi6 days ago
+31
Other than pilots from dropped airplanes.
31
LangyMD6 days ago
+25
He wrote a book about how the military needs to do more warcrimes; I'm unconvinced his orders to commit warcrimes are just to look tough and not because he wants more warcrimes to happen.
25
Fritzkreig6 days ago
+10
He is also a pretty big "religious nut" and is part of a weird church that has weird "plans" for America.
10
willun6 days ago
+5
"Funny how god wants exactly what we want. And wants us to be rich and powerful"
5
lebennaia6 days ago
+10
That doesn't matter. If you are in a position with command authority, such as a defence minister, it is a war crime to order such things. He doesn't even get to say them, because if it gets acted upon, Hegseth is personally on the hook for the crimes, whether or not there's an official order, written or spoken. He is also on the hook if it happens and he does nothing to prevent or punish such actions. In this case, he's actively encouraging it.
Also, Hegseth knows this. He's a former major, and will absolutely have been taught about the illegality of no quarter orders, and the doctrine of command responsibility, during his officer training. These are core aspects of what it means to be a military officer.
10
EddieLobster6 days ago
+2
This is a joke right?
2
capital_bj6 days ago
+26
"We negotiate with bombs" ok Pete how's that working out
26
ldg256 days ago
+10
Frankly I think things would be bad for the pilot regardless of what hegseth said. Not defending the idiot, his remark about no quarter really raised the bar on his daily dumb quotes. But let's not pretend Iran is a friendly and kind nation in general.
10
Mr_microplastics_Yum6 days ago
+11
Beer
11
kqlx6 days ago
+2
something dumb military meatheads say to stroke themselves. cringe
2
rallar86 days ago
+70
The TV host?
Edit: The downvotes are funny: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pete_Hegseth#Career
70
zerreit6 days ago
+14
No, that’s the president. You’re thinking of the DC Attorney General.
14
SockPuppet-476 days ago
+17
They should just pray harder to protect the American pilots and that their bombs will find their targets.
Allah vs Yahweh
The ultimate WrestleMania
Nevermind that they're both Abrahamic religions that are praying to the same fictional God.
17
spaetzelspiff6 days ago
+4
I mean, aside from China, Russia, Syria, North Korea, Venezuela, and Cuba, what enemies would ever actually help Iran? /s
4
cyb3rg0d56 days ago
+2
There are LOT MORE than that.
2
4ha16 days ago
+54
It's best opportunity China will ever have to test it's defenses against the USA and without consequences.
54
its_kgs_not_lbs6 days ago
+6
On the other hand, US learns from its shortcomings and improves the tech.
6
Rich_Housing9716 days ago
+7
There's a reason sports teams play scrimmage games. both sides get better. you do not want to be the only team to NOT play them.
7
Hamiltonblewit6 days ago
+159
They could be lying since they would’ve revealed the model earlier and they somehow haven’t shot down the myriad of aircraft’s literally dropping close range munitions or flying about the same day
159
Sooperooser6 days ago
+80
They are likely referring to IR tracking technology that is very hard to fool with EW or anything else.
80
UsagiTsukino6 days ago
+40
Aren't flares for IR targeting?
40
Coldbee6 days ago
+23
Yes, but at this point that's old tech that rarely works, nowadays there's laser dazzlers and decoys but those too have counter-countermeasures
23
grimmjow292006 days ago
+35
Flares are kinda like painting a road on a wall.
Only Tesla get fooled these days.
35
Flatus_Diabolic6 days ago
+33
In 2017, a US F-18 in a more or less perfect firing position and speed, [failed to shoot down a Syrian SU-22 using an advanced AIM-9X sidewinder](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ja%27Din_shootdown_incident#Shootdown) missile because the soviet-era rust bucket popped flares. The pilot had to fall back to using a (radar guided) AIM-120 to score the hit.
It turns out the USA developed the AIM-9X to not be fooled by *American* flares, which all burn with the same signature, but Russian flares burn “dirty” and each with a different signature.
I don’t know whether to credit the Russians with just being smarter about this than the US on this one (*of course* each flare should burn differently - why the hell would you want uniformity in an application like this?), or to just put it down to a fluke caused by 20 year old flares and shitty Russian manufacturing quality.
Anyway, yeah, flares definitely still work.
33
Skratt796 days ago
+3
Yes but to deploy flares the airframe needs to be aware of an incoming missile. It seems somehow the detection of these specific incoming threats did not work a few times, maybe because of reduced RCS of the missile?
3
Hamiltonblewit6 days ago
+3
to my knowledge, isn’t that the one where it’s impossible for any aircraft to escape since stealth doesn’t impact its targeting system. It does have its limitation but it does work at close range.
3
scorchedcross6 days ago
+14
No, there's an array of countermeasures available. How effective they are is variable.
14
crazedizzled6 days ago
+5
In fact it's unlikely this is the only time they have fired one. So most of them miss
5
scorchedcross6 days ago
+4
This isn't the only incidence of IR Surface to Air engagements or successful hits.
4
WhoSaidWhatNow20266 days ago
+6
There has never been an inescapable targeting system invented. There has always been, and for the foreseeable future will be, a way to mislead a computer system.
6
No_Iron_80876 days ago
+35
The reports of HQ-9B air defences systems being delivered in early March at the start of the war or after the 12 day war have been [disputed](https://dominotheory.com/hq-nein-analysts-say-no-evidence-iran-is-using-modern-chinese-air-defense-systems/), but more recently, reports have come out about the Iranian Airforce, at some time in the last few weeks, both [receiving HQ-9Bs and transitioning from Russian S-300 missiles to their own Bavar-373 missiles](https://x.com/academic_la/status/2040188103630225713).
It appears, at least to me, that Iran has pivoted to new missiles and either received updated HQ-9s, or they didn’t have them - as earlier reports suggested - and China recently supplied them.
35
rhino3696 days ago
+38
Iran doesn’t need new weapons to take down F-15s and an A-10. Those planes aren’t stealthy at all. And the A-10 is a sitting duck.
The change is that the first several weeks of the campaign the US wouldn’t fly non-stealth aircraft over Iran.
The US is taking more risks as the main Iranian defenses were destroyed.
Flying an A-10 into Iran is risky as hell, but it was a calculated risk to find the missing pilot.
38
catsbetterthankids6 days ago
+15
The A-10 was shot down hundreds of miles away from the F-15E. It was not part of the search and rescue operation.
15
Difficult_Mousse79766 days ago
+11
Officials say it was part of the search and rescue operation
11
niz_loc6 days ago
+4
How do you know that? I'm not arguing sith you, I'm asking.
Are you going off of where the pilot bailed from the plane? Because last I heard he/she was hit over Iran but made it out over the water?
4
Roach276 days ago
+4
Obviously they have been recently supplied or hidden, and that’s why they were able to hit the non-stealth aircraft.
No matter what Iran says, they can’t effectively combat f35s, and these systems (or similar ones) have already shot down f16s before so it should be so surprise.
4
TheLividPaper6 days ago
+36
It's more likely it was MANPADS, rather than an entire air defence system.
There's absolutely no way Iran has been just sheltering air defence assets in reserve for the opportunity to strike American aircraft. That's not to say these systems are not dangerous, they absolutely are.
It's just incredibly unlikely they held any systems in reserve so they could shoot down aircraft at a later time. Far more likely this was just a lucky hit with a MANPADS.
Edit:
This was also ALWAYS going to happen. Hundreds, up to a thousand sorties flown per-day makes this inevitable.
36
Blarg01176 days ago
+11
I've seen some postings of what looks like an analog to an Avenger AA system, basically 4 MANPADS and an optical system strapped to a 4x4.
Not long range but better than what a person can carry.
11
TheLividPaper6 days ago
+2
I feel like something like that makes sense.
It just doesn't make sense to me that Iran would actively choose to not use (larger) AD systems, just for the chance to use them later. Again, I really don't want to downplay the threat - Iran can still fire back, I just find it unlikely they have many AD systems left.
(Other than MANPADS and similar/related assets)
2
adrenaline_X6 days ago
+3
It would make sense to hide/hold them in reserves if their plan is to down and capture pilots as hostages as bargaining chips.
Trump has been spouting about the war is over but more importantly that they have Ari superiority for the past week(s). They now have planes flying pretty low and within one day Iran shot down 3 of them and last I heard one pilot was unaccounted for (captured).
3
happy-cig6 days ago
+3
No bc the far left wants to see USA to fail. So any negative press is just fuel to the fire.
As a centrist leaning left it sucks to see it happen bc it's American lives hard stop. F*** Trump we need to get out of this together as Americans not be fragmented.
3
nbeaster6 days ago
+2
Then to top it off, congratulations you shot down something that was designed 60 years ago. I’m sure they have been modernized plenty of times at this point but “new” defense system may have led to a shoot down of 60 year old base.
2
Drenlin6 days ago
+19
They've actually become very adept at developing indigenous systems, both via iteration on copied or reverse engineered designs and via fully indigenous development. They're also good at redneck engineering various bits and bobs into legitimate threats that are c****, simple, and effective - a skill honed by long term support for groups like the Houthis. Put those concepts together and you have a pretty wide and varied array of pieces to build a functional a SAM system.
Case in point, look at the Ghaem-118, AD-08 Majid, Azarakhsh, or even [this f****** thing](https://media.defense.gov/2020/Feb/19/2002251787/1920/1080/0/200219-M-LM779-006.JPG). All incredibly simple systems compared to something like a Pantsir or IM-SHORAD...they appear, at least, to be little more than modular systems made from common parts, on launchers bolted to a commercial vehicle.
19
kololz6 days ago
+3
Iran did buy Russian [Verba](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K333_Verba) systems but also had produced [their own advanced model since 2017](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misagh-3). Not sure if it’s either or not.
3
RODjij6 days ago
+3
Probably Chinese or maybe Russian sourced. Putin would probably have liked to keep it to protect his own resources.
3
Nuclear-Jester6 days ago
+681
I love how currently you can't trust either side on the actual state of Iran's armed forces
681
Snoutysensations6 days ago
+207
War has always involved as much deception as humans are capable of.
207
Kwikstep6 days ago
+62
The fog of war.
62
TangerineBroad46046 days ago
+34
The brain fog of war
34
SteveDougson6 days ago
+22
"all quiet on the frontal lobe"
22
ScornForSega6 days ago
+9
The frontotemporal dementia of war.
9
PickleRancher6 days ago
+28
First casualty of war is always the truth
28
mogafaq6 days ago
+6
Iran would be dumb to actually disclose their AA capability. Leak enough to get your enemies thinking, but never enough to let them develop counter measures.
6
ImLiushi6 days ago
+6
The first casualty of war is always the truth. Although in this case I’m pretty sure at least the US was lying from before anything even started. Truth died the moment Americans chose Trump.
6
The_Starving_Autist6 days ago
+334
so now China and Russia get to test their equipment against US military
334
OkArm85816 days ago
+168
Russia is doing exactly that for the past 4 years in Ukraine. They can barely cover themselves nowadays.
168
cb1486 days ago
+65
So this must be Chinese if it’s working since Russia is getting their asses handed to themselves in Ukraine.
65
Greedy_Rabbit_17416 days ago
+57
What do you mean working? They hit 2 jets in 10000s of missions flown. Some in the middle of Iran.
Whatever they are doing it is most definitely NOT working.
57
I-heart-java6 days ago
+25
A lot of people aren’t talking about the sortie-to-shoot down ratio. It’s wild they can even get in range of ground based IR weapons.
Not that we should even be there doing those sorties but I believe in looking at these things as unbiased as possible.
25
ResponsibleClock92896 days ago
+9
It’s already been tested multiple times in Venezuela and during the initial air campaign against Iran’s nuclear facilities
9
nodigit6 days ago
+21
China and Russian won’t risk having their equipment stolen by the US.
Russian and China are definitely giving all of their old c*** to Iran to use.
21
didnt-ask-but-ok6 days ago
+14
Yup and the shit they’re shooting down is old af too
14
Front_Promise_59916 days ago
+199
I would say the same.
At one point your enemy starts to think is it true or lie.
199
MinoltaMiyata6 days ago
+137
The British said carrots helped their air defense troops spot german planes during air raids. Truth was they had secret radar tech. [That's where the "carrots help you see in the dark" myth](https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/carrots-cant-help-you-see-in-the-dark-heres-how-world-war-ii-propaganda-campaign-popularized-the-myth-28812484/) came from
137
ArchiStanton6 days ago
+43
It was actually all propagated from big carrot in order to sell more product. Bugs bunny in looney tunes too
43
im_thatoneguy6 days ago
+17
Bugs bunny ate carrots because he’s a parody of Clark Gable and Clark Gable ate a carrot.
https://youtu.be/Wcrth90C3D4
17
ArchiStanton6 days ago
+4
So big carrot got to Clark gable too. We’ve just busted this case wide open
4
Telvin3d6 days ago
+6
It’s also where carrot cake came from. They made a huge show of growing lots of carrots, which meant they needed to invent recipes to use them all
6
YourFreshConnect6 days ago
+5
Well thank you because it is delicious
5
HoustonHous6 days ago
+24
It's not like the US and Israel won't know if it's true or not... they are saying it for the rest of us...
24
di11deux6 days ago
+130
This is very unlikely. If you have a new system, the incentive is to mask that capability as long as possible to score more hits, not broadcast that capability so your enemy can change tactics.
Additionally, big missiles make big booms. When big missiles hit planes, planes don’t usually go very far. All evidence is suggesting these planes were hit and then limped quite a ways before the pilots bailed, indicating whatever hit them was on the smaller side. That’s consistent with an IR MANPAD, which can pop up anywhere.
130
TharpaLodro6 days ago
+61
Iran's strategy is to make the costs of this war unacceptable to the population of the US. Telling Americans "we will keep shooting down your planes" is probably more valuable to them than actually doing it.
61
Rustic_gan1236 days ago
+9
A couple of downed planes is nothing. Planes were lost in Iraq and Yugoslavia. Perhaps only Afghanistan didn't, but there wasn't even a semblance of a technologically advanced army there.
9
Ashamed_Distance_1446 days ago
+16
Well it was unacceptable for me when they declared war without congressional approval. Dipshit in chief is going to bankrupt the country for nothing.
16
Individual_Laugh13356 days ago
+7
When was the last time Congress declared war?
7
phonebalone6 days ago
+3
And?
Are you saying that attacking other countries without declaring war (getting official congressional approval) is a-ok because it’s been done in the past?
3
actuallyapossom6 days ago
+17
The reporting I've seen says this "system" amounts to wide spectrum cameras placed along routes of planes. I imagine the only way to take advantage of that is MPADS.
Apparently, it works, but it's also implied Israel and the US can change and then alternate routes in the future to mitigate it.
17
IIIllIIlllIlII6 days ago
+2
Saw something a few days ago about loitering Shahed drones with IR missiles / seekers.
Lay these along potential flight paths. Not easily jammed unless you’re releasing flares the whole way; they’re moving so finding them and AGM and targeting more difficult, and they’re expensive to shoot down. They can also loiter at altitudes where IR from low flying aircraft is more visible.
2
CBT7commander6 days ago
+17
That likely wouldn’t work. Shaheds are way, way to slow to take out fighters as a missile, and carrying a missile is not something drones in Shahed weight classes and complexity can do just like that. It would require such massive changes to the airframe, it would be easier and cheaper and harder for the US to spot to just have Joe with a Manpad watch out on a stretch of land
17
IIIllIIlllIlII6 days ago
+6
They’ve already been found in Ukraine being used by the Russians.
The Shahed-136 with an igla attached to the top of it.
https://interestingengineering.com/military/shahed-drone-with-shoulder-fired-missile
I can’t re-find the source of the Iran example but i distinctly recall it uses an IR seeeker and rocket from the Sahed
6
Unspoken6 days ago
+7
The problem with that is the US has air superiority and the US can fire an AIM missile at the shaheed at a much further distance than w/e manpad is strapped to a shaheed.
The Ukraine vs Russia war is a war of attrition where they are trying to use the smallest munition possible like cannons or helicopters to take out the shaheed.
It's a completely different scenario
7
Stoyfan6 days ago
+4
Strapping a MANPAD to the larger shaheed drones (not the dorito one-way drones) is not too difficult and has been done before in the Russio-Ukranian war but it does require a communication link with the drone to fire the MANPAD.
4
ReverseCarry6 days ago
+2
It’s called the 358 missile
2
Gunsensual6 days ago
+5
It depends on the goal. When the American public thinks the military is untouchable in the skies they tend to go along with war. Iran bluffing about a new capability, which is more likely just a tweaked older capability, would serve the purpose of informing Americans that they are in fact risking something at war.
There's a whole artform to choosing when to reveal, bluff, or withhold military technological advances.
5
im_thatoneguy6 days ago
+2
Electronic Warfare pods/ECM are meant to mess with the fuse on a missile by having it detonate too soon or too late. Either way you can end up with just enough damage to make a plane un flyable without it being blown to small pieces. It could be a full size AA missile while still just disabling the plane.
2
No-Fig-86146 days ago
+32
This is lucky manpad type hits, they no longer have S300/400 type systems. They have a TON of manpads though and you get enough people or a lucky shot and ontop of that top officials saying they own the air space.... giving airmen more confidence in being able to do things that they wouldn't do if they knew there was capabilities to shoot down a plane.... this is what you get when you say you own the airspace and you don't. Of course they own the airspace in terms of the bigger systems but not on the level of manpads. We don't know how many manpad shots were taken at these aircraft (it could of been 1, or 20+ and with a fragemntation warhead, like how the f-35 got home okay, these got hit enough to take down the aircraft, and take the A10 that was downed which is meant to survive the largest beating of any aircraft, an unconfirmed assumption is it either got hit with 1 really great hit, or a few hits that took it out, while the blackhawks just got a single shot down, the f15, I wonder about).
For those who think this is some special tech from russia or china are wrong, this is simply a lucky manpad from in this case a slow flying A10, or an f15 flying to low and slow.... and a lucky shot. This isn't some special or new tech being introduced, this is a manpad that got lucky, its a matter of probabilties.... take to many slow flying planes low enough, and enough people with manpads ready to step out and make a lucky shot.
Get ready though, instead of strategic bombing, areas will start seeing carpet bombings on areas. If the straight isn't opened or if the airmen are taken prisoner, there won't be a simple negotiation, this administration will just bomb anything that looks like it could be an area where they think there is a store munitions (regardless of if there are or not, the official reports will be they detected munitions and destroyed the entire area), if they have people who have manpads, if they have a strategic value, there will be complete bombing campaigns on it.
If you think I'm wrong do a remind me in 48 hours and lets see.
Edit: for those who think that this isn't a manpad, please let me know what you think this would be, and also how both planes were taken down under 15000 feet and were doing low and slow runs. This wasn't some special equipment that no one has seen. Just take a look at Ukraine and Russia, the amount of helicopters, planes, etc taken out by stingers is enough to show that beyond larger more complex systems like patriot, IRIS, NASAMS, etc. Hell we even saw a russian helicopter get taken out by a Ukraine drone which no one would of assumed. People that think the barebones type anti-aircraft systems can't do damage, are yet to learn what clever people with a lot to lose are able to do.
Edit 2: People also forget that the way Iran developed their military when "the head of the snake" is cut off, they designed their military so that divisions are given extreme amounts of autonomy and are able to make decisions within their groups. Iran made this part of their strategy early on knowing that Israel and if the US stepped in that they would target right off the bat the major comms/decision centers. They learned a ton from how the US took out Iraq (which at the time had one of the largest anti-aircraft defense layouts of any country, Syria had the same issues which led to the collapse of the major military that bunkered down in key spots but lost control of 80+% of their military abilities (given this was also almost 20 years ago, **Iran learned off of decentralized military decision making**, and made it a clear priority)).
32
Stereotypical_Viking6 days ago
+11
Best comment in the thread
11
Funny_Obligation24126 days ago
+75
I think the Americans just got lazy. Iran doesn't have any new tech.
75
scorchedcross6 days ago
+72
I'm doubtful the US has gotten lazy, they're just putting an incredible amount of airframes into harm's way.
There's limited defences remaining but that doesn't mean 0. They're taking calculated risks, and that's not been working as well the last few days, so either something has changed the risk or we assume this is some probability anomaly. I'd guess the former, whether that's employment tactics or a materiel change, who knows.
72
Funny_Obligation24126 days ago
+30
This hasnt been planned like desert storm. This is 100% American lazy planning at falt and bad orders from the top down. Generals got fired for not going with this. Planes will keep getting hit.
30
WhoSaidWhatNow20266 days ago
+26
Yes, planes will get hit. What is your point? When you fly tens of thousands of missions in hostile territory it is expected to take some level of losses. This internet expectation where not being completely invincible indicates total failure is ridiculous.
26
Infinite_Click_65896 days ago
+15
Desert Storm was planned by one of the greatest strategic and tactical minds of the 20th century, and he was brought in out of retirement specifically for the operation.
This s*** show is seeing generals doing the best they can trying to accomplish goals set by drunken idiots who are saying " f*** yeah, that sounds badass let's do X"
15
Funny_Obligation24126 days ago
+2
Yeah
2
scorchedcross6 days ago
+10
Your right in that the military did not have an adequate amount of time to prepare compared to the previous Gulf wars. However, the military didn't make the decision to strike or dictate the timing. They were clearly rushed to task by the US President.
Generals have likely been fired for voicing the risk of these insufficient preparations as opposed to their performance under conditions. Unless you believe the drunk fox news co-host...
10
Funny_Obligation24126 days ago
+2
Yup thats all im trying to say. We got narco don fucked at up 4am thinking it would be fun to mess with Iran and then drunk Pete that doesn't know left from right agreed with his king.
Same dumb planning as the Russians not telling its army its invading Ukraine .
2
Stoyfan6 days ago
+5
I mean - they lost 75 aircraft in desert storm (a war that lasted 6 months) and so far they have lost 2 in the 30 days of this war.
And they have already knocked out the longer range SAMs and the Iranian airforce already so I would say that is a pretty good result.
5
Daffan6 days ago
+2
Yeah they should have used the technology from Area 51 so their kd sortie ratio would be 100:0 instead of 100:1 or whatever.
2
sylanar6 days ago
+19
They're flying 100s of sorties a day, it's more surprising how few losses there have been so far. The E3 plane or whatever it's name is being hit on the runway is more impressive I think. Seems to have caught the us off guard and they hit that with incredible accuracy
19
True_Window_93896 days ago
+4
It’s war, shooting planes down is normal. Maybe they have new tech from Russia or China, maybe there was something amiss on our side. Part of the risk in these dumb wars is that it exposes technology and tactics, and allows adversaries to use it as a training ground for something bigger ahead. We were doing the same in Ukraine against Russia. Trump and Hegseth are desperate enough to not hold much back right now, and China is watching everything we do like a hawk right now to find an edge to use against us in a future conflict. We shouldn’t be giving them that opportunity.
4
stewsters6 days ago
Don't need it either, the F15 and Warthog are both 50+ years old. The warthog was retired because it can't stand up to Manpads.
Americans are pulling the old airframes out of storage like Russia was pulling out the tanks from the 70s.
0
Happy-Gnome6 days ago
+38
We’re not pulling old airframes out of storage. The F15E is an active variant in the current manual of arms. Now if you start seeing Tomcats out there, whew.
38
84Cressida6 days ago
+5
We scrapped them all so Iran couldn’t smuggle parts
5
spmnorge6 days ago
+15
Oh ffs, f35 is also 20 years old. All of them get updates every year and have upgraded awacs etc
15
Man_under_Bridge4206 days ago
+5
If it works it works
5
Redditor_exe6 days ago
+8
Brother you have no clue what you’re talking about. Yes they’ve tried to retire the A-10 but haven’t been able to design a suitable replacement and the F-15 is very much still a widely used aircraft worldwide that’s been updated multiple times.
8
niz_loc6 days ago
+3
The A-10 hasn't been retired yet. They aren't being pulled out of storage.
3
bgat796 days ago
+4
You don't need fancy air defense to shoot down a f-15 e. Two were shot down in the "gulf war" 1991.
4
A2ndRedditAccount6 days ago
+92
But we were told they no longer had any air defenses!
92
mshelbz6 days ago
+12
April fools!
12
copperblood6 days ago
+26
Well it’s a concept of no longer having any defensives! 🤣🤡
26
emmer6 days ago
+1
DID THEY EVEN SAY THANK U FOR NT HAVEJNG AIR DEFNSES???? 😂🤣😜🤪
1
Hamiltonblewit6 days ago
+20
They’re likely lying about it since they didn’t give a specific description of it nor is shooting down 4th gen’s within this conflict unusual. There were later footages of helicopters and C-130s and refueling aircraft’s flying around Iran.
We’ve lost much less planes than in Iraq despite the country being much more larger and well equipped
20
worryinnotime6 days ago
+5
Are comparing the same lengths of time or the entire Iraqi war? Math matters.
5
A2ndRedditAccount6 days ago
+8
In the first 30 days of the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, the US lost 1 F-18 to enemy fire.
8
Hamiltonblewit6 days ago
+13
I was referring to the first 6 week or so of the Gulf War where we had nearly 4x the aircraft “shot down”, many of our destroyed assets here were destroyed on the ground unless we count drone’s
13
Hamiltonblewit6 days ago
+6
We’ve virtually taken out of Iran air defenses if we can still fly a majority of planes into the country ever since the first week, there’s been reported B-2 and jet fighter activity in Iran for ages so shooting a few down isn’t indicative of sufficient air defense coverage, except for their Eastern portion which is more untouched due to its distance.
6
A2ndRedditAccount6 days ago
+5
Also, Trump is likely lying when he says their air defenses have been completely eliminated.
5
Hamiltonblewit6 days ago
+32
Its one of those moments where it’s just semantics, we’ve taken out “all of” Iraq’s air defenses back then and we still lost nearly dozens of aircraft and that was considered a turkey shoot.
If China sent a aircraft carrier group, bombed Washington and killed our entire command structure and Trump on the first day, while only losing a couple of jets per week, shit, our air defenses might as well be gone
32
KenseiLover6 days ago
+2
Bro what? Iran is 3-4x larger than Iraq?
2
Hamiltonblewit6 days ago
+4
I meant to say Iran is larger, which you know, supports my point since Iran is much harder to deal with for that reason
4
KenseiLover6 days ago
+3
Thought so; fair enough.
3
LifeOfHi6 days ago
+16
Imagine a scenario where these systems came from Russia and US intelligence were aware they were being delivered but couldn’t attack them in transit because that would’ve been a direct attack on Russian equipment. Now imagine the US allowed fighter jets to hold the air space knowing this equipment was being installed.
16
TacoIncoming6 days ago
+12
You’d first have to imagine a scenario where this isn’t bullshit, but it is.
12
musicnotwords6 days ago
+1
imagine being a pilot knowing this
1
Zwischenzug6 days ago
+21
They probably got it from the Chinese or the Russians.
21
Ok_Effort83306 days ago
+2
my first thought as well.
2
Broad-Lobster74706 days ago
+7
Made in China ?
7
andropogon096 days ago
+20
Is that the air defense system that was completely destroyed, obliterated, or decimated?
20
Unspoken6 days ago
+7
It's just their run of the mill manpad. Anything strategic at this point is toast. Can't get rid of all the shoulder fired stuff without boots on the ground.
7
jackp0t7896 days ago
+4
No, didn't you read what they said?! Its a new one!
4
Minimum-Ad-80566 days ago
+26
They shot down one fighter that's mostly 50 years old tech.
They've hit 10,000 targets with 1 actual shootdown. Tne F35 flew home.
26
tradetofi6 days ago
+16
NO, It is not 50 years old tech. Stop deluding yourself.
The F-15E is currently the primary strike fighter for the US. Despite its age, it remains highly relevant due to extensive upgrades, such as the Radar Modernization Program which replaces older systems with modern AESA radar. It is expected to remain in active service until at least the **2030s.**
16
Redditor_exe6 days ago
+18
I mean that is true, but it also is a fact that shooting down an F-15 isn’t some unheard of feat requiring cutting edge tech. There’s only so much upgrades and updates can do. It’s not like they shot down an F-22
18
PhillipIInd6 days ago
+2
F22 is like 35 year old tech lol
2
tradetofi6 days ago
+5
If China shoots it down, yes you are right. Nothing special about it. But we are talking about Iran here whoes air defense was supposedly highly degraded by now.
5
Minimum-Ad-80566 days ago
+2
Lol, it's an upgraded f15. If upgraded f15s were the way there would be no need for newer generations, but that's not the case is it?
2
Elendils_Bear6 days ago
+5
And the awacs? First kill in history.
5
Sprangz6 days ago
+6
Was on the ground not in the air.
6
Minimum-Ad-80566 days ago
+4
And one of the only out of thousands flights over their nation
Even 30 shoot downs at this point would be considered a failure.
4
tradetofi6 days ago
+6
It is considered a failure until the strait is open and gas prices come down. So it is a failure so far. but I am sure you can spin it other ways
6
SadGuy2020s6 days ago
+11
Wow, they shot down a 4th gen airframe in service since the 80s…this wasn’t even an EX
Nobody is impressed, if they get an F22 or an F35 that’s a story
11
CBT7commander6 days ago
+8
It’s complete BS.
You don’t need new and advanced systems to shoot down an f15e. Even if it wasn’t simply shot at with a manpad, any AA system can shoot down an f15e. It has a massive radar signature and doesn’t have the advanced EW of the f15EX.
Any of the systems previously operated by Iran could have done it, and it makes more sense for one to have survived the SEAD campaign than for a new system to have been implemented
8
WasteBinStuff6 days ago
+6
Infrared and thermal imaging. Relatively low tech, mobile and not dependent on connected networks.
Doesn't matter the level of radar or signal stealth, jets can't hide their heat.
6
Legionof16 days ago
+5
You would be surprised how well our actual stealth fighters hide their heat.
5
boringfantasy6 days ago
+8
Calling bs tbh. They obviously just got lucky. But that being said, the US hubris will cost them lives if they try anything stupid like a ground invasion.
8
Sir_BugsAlot6 days ago
+2
You can get hit by lots of things when you fly really low, and maybe your guard is down because "you own the airspace".
2
RandomUser37776 days ago
+2
We are kind of back to anti-air artillery. there is a widely used 76mm guns on ships (US and many EU countries) that can target aircraft/drones and they have a 10km+ range. If you build something like that and add-in using high end thermal imaging with computer calculated aiming(rather than radar knowing anything with radar is going to be blown up quickly) and set time delay fuses and/or proximity fuses and you have an anti-air weapon that has no radar signature and can hit targets at a fair distance. That said Iran claimed years ago to have cloned that gun (not sure how many features they cloned). The high-tech versions has shells that can change directions extending the range that they can accurately hit anti-aircraft targets.
And if you expect your opponent to immediately attempt to destroy anything emitting radar, you would be smart to rely on non-radar anti-aircraft weapons because they will survive longer.
2
frito116 days ago
+3
from what i heard and it would make the most sense it was a MANPADS which isn't new and is impossible for us to destroy if they have them distributed all over the place as its simply a portable rocket launcher carried by a soldier and they use infrared not radar to track their target so pilots get little warning if they never see it fired at them.
3
few6 days ago
+3
Thousands of MANPADS distributed around a country will lead to airframe losses given enough sorties. This is the big flaw in abusing the capabilities of a superior air force. Just because we can take control of the airspace doesn't mean the aircraft will be invulnerable.
Normally military strategy would use multiple overlapping capabilities to avoid continuously exposing a single element, which will otherwise eventually get hit. Like an aircraft carrier being surrounded by rings of ships with complementary abilities.
3
yosisoy6 days ago
+7
Iran also said they dropped Israeli fighter jets. Iran is full of shit
7
niz_loc6 days ago
+3
Going with "sure thing, buddy" as far as new tech.
No idea what downed the F-15 yesterday, but I'm assuming it's something they've shot hundreds of at aircraft over the past few weeks and last years 12 day war. And they finally got one with it.
I'd also assume as the war progresses and they (US/Israel) have gotten lucky so far, they got looser and looser with risk taking. And just figured out that even low probability doesn't mean zero.
3
Andr1yTheOne6 days ago
+4
Its Russian.
4
Well__shit6 days ago
+3
Thanks China
3
Rabti6 days ago
+2
new?
As in, our hased after the old one was recently destroyed?
2
[deleted]6 days ago
+2
[removed]
2
AGrandNewAdventure6 days ago
+3
This is one of the air defense systems we were all told were completely obliterated, correct?
3
MagnusDidAlotWrong6 days ago
+1
They've had Verbas on order for a while now, slated to be delivered next year. Might have been rushed, given the circumstances.
1
swe3nytodd6 days ago
+1
Dont believe it for a second.
1
_jnpn6 days ago
+1
Iran editing the wiktionary page for ["obliteration"](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obliteration)
178 Comments