Tomahawk -tuah'ed
I'm against all this shit just wanted to hop on the band wagon.
166
ProductArizona4 days ago
+22
You're too good at this to be against it bro
22
wearebobNL4 days ago
+3
I snorted my tea thanks.
3
bradmccarthy4 days ago
+7
Works better if you drink it
7
skullshank4 days ago
+6
boof it!
6
Informal_Witness38694 days ago
+13
I swear guys! This is the last one! This one truly be the one to end all wars!
13
Moderate-Extremism4 days ago
+1
Trump’s response: “I cherish peace with all of my heart. I don't care how many men, women and children I kill to get it.”
1
YakResident_30694 days ago
+1
Putin school of how to make demands
1
[deleted]4 days ago
+380
[deleted]
380
555Cats5554 days ago
+217
Thanks for sharing the text. Its annoying when people post articles that are paywalled.
217
unknownkid04 days ago
+7
Yeah, thanks for this. OP didn't think too much about posting this
7
bathroomheater4 days ago
+55
So what were the ten points?
55
Snotmyrealname4 days ago
+111
Per the [Kobeissi Letter](https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2041292793063121380)
(Sorry for the twitter link, but it’s not up on xcancel yet)
Iran's 10-point plan includes:
1. Guarantee that Iran will not be attacked again
2. Permanent end to the war, not just a ceasefire
3. End to Israeli strikes in Lebanon
4. Lifting of all US sanctions on Iran
5. End to all regional fighting against Iranian allies
6. In return, Iran would open the Strait of Hormuz
7. Iran would impose a Hormuz fee of $2 million per ship
8. Iran would split these fees with Oman
9. Iran to provide rules for safe passage through Hormuz
10. Iran to use Hormuz fees for reconstruction instead of reparations
111
The_Sneakiest_Fox4 days ago
+49
That seems... completely reasonable.
49
darrute4 days ago
+29
Which is why the US will never agree to it.
29
SporksInjected4 days ago
+6
I noticed there was nothing about nuclear materials in there
6
awesomface4 days ago
+28
They’re literally asking for more than they had even before the war without any concessions by them. It’s not reasonable in the slightest.
28
Hydronum4 days ago
+11
They didn't start the war, so kinda does seem reasonable.
11
Gunningham4 days ago
+5
2 million a ship sounds pretty steep, but I’m no expert.
5
The_Sneakiest_Fox4 days ago
+17
There are 2 million barrels on a ship, so it's a $1 surcharge per barrel, and they are asking for that to repair the damage the US has done. It's currently at $112 USD per barrel. Before the war started it was $60-$72 per barrel. So a lot less steep than the war tax we are currently paying.
17
Gunningham4 days ago
+10
Thanks for the context. Like I said. I’m not an expert.
10
jonknowzeverything4 days ago
+2
Its less about the money, but more about Iran having no rights to charge tolls on the international passage ways. Also, you give in, there is nothing stopping them from throwing a tantrum and bump it up to $2 some time later.
2
The_Sneakiest_Fox4 days ago
+5
>Its less about the money, but more about Iran having no rights to charge tolls on the international passage ways
You mean like it was before the US started bombing their infrastructure for some vague, yet to be fully determined reason?
5
FerricDonkey4 days ago
+7
Remember that the Iranian government is evil and sponsors a massive amount of terrorism. That doesn't mean the US war was a good idea or well planned out, but it does mean that lifting sanctions and stopping hostilities against the terrorists they fund in Lebanon and other places is not actually a good idea. Hezbollah, hamas, etc are "allies of Iran" and are absolute scum, and there can't be a deal that just allows them to run wild.
So 3, 4, and 5 at minimum seem completely impossible.
7
AGSattack4 days ago
+8
Exactly. Extremely frustrating.
8
BmacSOS4 days ago
+21
This guy announces his war crimes. What a piece of shit human being and stupid mother f*****. The whole world will suffer because his b**** baby ego is out of control. What a f****** psychopath.
21
aerobat34 days ago
+1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
MultiGeometry4 days ago
+3
45 day cease fire so that Trump can strong arm the GOP to approving more military funds for his war.
3
Moderate-Extremism4 days ago
+1
No, Iran is old news, all my homies are into Cuba now.
1
Paper_Clip1004 days ago
+7
Well if bibi says it, trumps gotta acquiesce
7
johncarlo084 days ago
+1
Yeah what f****** bullshit. Bibi says no ceasefire so now that’s what Trump is going to do
1
UseDaSchwartz4 days ago
+1
Agree to not enrich uranium…you mean like what they agreed to before 2017?
1
Stinkfinger834 days ago
+483
Trump wants peace, and he doesn’t care how may men, women, and children he has to kill to get it
483
Aggravating-Card-8294 days ago
+16
If this entire beach were dicks, I would suck every one of them in the name of peace!
16
3445676533796435554 days ago
+108
War is Peace.
108
Such_Difference_22484 days ago
+58
Freedom is slavery
58
luveveryone4 days ago
+39
Ignorance is Strength
39
Late-Resolve98714 days ago
+50
Statutory r*** is underaged consent
50
amakai4 days ago
+7
With current administration I finally fully understand the meaning behind all three.
7
luveveryone4 days ago
+4
So very true
4
mentaljobbymonster4 days ago
+6
Poo is pee
6
Future-Raisin37814 days ago
+26
We were never at war with Iran!
We were always at war with Iran!
26
ThatchedRoofCottage4 days ago
+11
When they started claiming we’ve been at war with them for decades it felt a little on the nose. This shit is ridiculous.
11
Future-Raisin37814 days ago
+12
"Don’t believe the c*** you see from these people, the fake news. … What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.”
- Trump in 2018.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/25/politics/donald-trump-vfw-unreality/
12
factoid_4 days ago
+2
Don’t believe the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was the party’s final, most essential command
2
Penqwin4 days ago
+1
De-escalation through escalation
1
findingmike4 days ago
+14
Peacemaker's speech is a favorite of mine
14
bigredthesnorer4 days ago
+17
I think he really wants the oil. I would not be surprised if that was his real reason, hidden behind the nuke and regime change BS. He thought Iran would be wiped out in a day and Kushner and Eric would be in there a week later making oil deals.
17
donniedarko10104 days ago
+2
Bro he said it so himself today. Really i would love to have the oil but American people don't get it.
2
ogholycat4 days ago
+17
This guy gets it.
17
tootaflute4 days ago
+3
No not the children, he'll keep them for himself.
3
DamperBritches4 days ago
+1
He doesn't want peace, he just wants a peice
1
BreakChicago4 days ago
+17
Is Why It Matters a new mandatory section of every article? Or has AI already changed the formats it was supposed to mimic?
17
PmMeCuteDogsThanks_4 days ago
+6
Not X. Not Y. Only Z. Here’s why it matters.
6
MonkeyDeltaFoxtrot4 days ago
+20
Always ask for twice what you need, because you’ll only ever get half of what you want.
20
Narf2344 days ago
+42
Anyone have a paywall workaround?
42
InadequateUsername4 days ago
+10
Yeah I use IceRaven with Bypass Paywalls Clean extension installed.
10
deeweezul4 days ago
+2
Webpage archive usually works.
2
Time-Weekend-86113 days ago
+1
Reload the page, and then stop loading before it's fully finished. If you time it right, you can hit the sweet spot after the page loads but before the paywall widget does.
Easier on slower connections and phones.
1
BlipBlapBloppityBoop4 days ago
+36
Negotiating classically involves asking for too much and accepting what you hoped for.
But given how bad Trump is at negotiating with himself, I wonder if the Iran regime’s best move is to set out a very clear checklist of demands (call them “needs”) for the strait to be left alone. And then just point to the list any time “negotiating” happens. Trump will just negotiate against himself while it remains clear to the rest of the world what exactly it is they want.
36
jared5554 days ago
+4
He always starts with the "screw you" price and gets upset when people either refuse to negotiate with him or when they start with the "screw you" counter.
It is like if you were patient and looking to buy a home. The home is worth $100k. If the sellers starting asking price is $125k you might try making an offer of $90k and negotiate to $100k.
With Trump he starts with a $1 million asking price and refuses to budge on it until he realizes he has a week left to sell and make a down payment where he is moving for a new job. Then ends up having to accept an offer of $50k.
4
misterxboxnj4 days ago
+62
I think they underestimated Iran's willingness to let it's people suffer so they can again blame America. Iran knows the longer they draw this out the higher oil prices will go and that hurts Trump and Israel and everyone will blame them for f****** up the world's economy for no good reason.
62
Fictional-adult4 days ago
+56
> Iran's willingness to let it's people suffer so they can again blame America
There are many many negative things I could say about the Iranian regime, but in this instance they aren’t to blame.
We bombed their nuclear program in the 12 day war, and then reached a peace deal. We then struck them again shortly after. There’s no world in which they could accept a cease fire, because it essentially is just an acknowledgement that we will restock our supplies and resume hostilities.
Iran needs to get something out of a peace deal that actually ensures peace.
56
LilyBelle5044 days ago
+13
Iran's regime: Ensures they have enough time to build up their nuclear program and reduce it's breakout time so next time someone attacks them they can stop it\*
The US and Israel striking Iran's regime first in a conventional war, is really a function of Iran's regime being incapable for striking first. The regime knows if it kicked off a conventional war with ballistic missile strikes on US bases or Israel, they would get pummeled military, and they would be on the back-foot for diplomacy.
So instead Iran's regime resorts to a shadow war as it's primary method. Fund militia proxy groups all over the region to destabilize your enemies, and keep them in a constant state of paranoia and wasting their resources combating them. All while the regime can "officially" keep its hands off and not let any of it's own soldiers die.
Sure, the US and Israel fired the first "official" shots each time... But is it really that different than Iran's regime funding a 100,000 strong insurgent group in a foreign country, who routinely fires rockets into civilian centers- on their command?
13
CankleSteve4 days ago
+11
Generally I understand your realpolitik point here but, Iran knows its friends were few and now ever further limited. This mainly stems from their nuclear program. Their regime wants to eradicate Israel as a nation and pursuing nuclear options on the side is rightfully looked with skepticism. I’m no huge fan of Israel or of the settlers in the West Bank. However, the fact is Israel isn’t going anywhere outside of nuclear holocaust anytime soon and the world has a vested interest in not allowing nuclear holocausts.
11
555Cats5554 days ago
+38
Theres no point in agreeing to a "temporary" ceasefire.
If the US and Isreal were serious about ending the war they could just withdraw troops and stop bombing... but at rhe very least Isreal has shown with Gaza they dont stick to peace deals. Isreal kept bombing pretty much right after a ceasefire was made in Gaza.
Why would Iran take any kind of temporary ceasefire seriously.
I dont blame Iran for wanting a stop to aggressions from Isreal and US before even considering any kind of serious negotiations.
38
RightHamster4 days ago
+18
Learned from mother Russia
18
Hentai_Yoshi4 days ago
+7
More like learned basic bargaining philosophy, which is kind of a political science
7
forg0tmypen4 days ago
+5
It’s basic negotiating. When I tried to evict my tenant years ago, 3 months in we went to mediation and they asked for $75,000 to give the keys back. Completely shook us. We said no and filed a court date and they eventually settled for far far less 4 months later. The point being is- asking for completely unrealistic compensation when you have nothing to lose by the other side saying no is a common tactic
5
Hungryforflavor4 days ago
+2
Too bad u still got hosed
2
Lokon194 days ago
+8
lol of course Israel wants to keep going
8
BOPSurfcasting4 days ago
+40
Well, the gloves are off. We are all going to be paying for the rebuild in Iran through tolls that will be passed on through the pump.
40
Maleficent_Owl_70014 days ago
+71
You must be joking. Trump is going to need to send both the Ford and the Lincoln in along with thousands of ground troops.
Iran has nothing to lose and they want American casualties.
And Trump played right into it as he is so f****** stupid.
71
whatproblems4 days ago
+44
and sounds like they’re firing all the competent people saying this is a terrible idea
44
Leftoverofferings4 days ago
+17
Or are they firing the competent people who say dropping a nuke on Iran is a war crime? Or are they firing anyone who won't support a coup staged by 🥭 for the midterms? All of the above?
17
yeroii4 days ago
+21
Iran leaders have plenty to lose yet.
It's a test now who thinks can endure more comparative pain.
21
Grombrindal184 days ago
+26
On the one side we have a country willing to massacre thousands of civilians for protesting, and on the other a president who is willing to throw soldiers into a meat grinder to distract from news of him being a sex criminal.
This is going to get really bad for pretty much everyone.
26
WhoSaidWhatNow20264 days ago
+7
>Iran has nothing to lose
You people keep saying this and it has never been accurate.
7
it_diedinhermouth4 days ago
+8
Maybe it’s more true to say Iran , being a defender, can afford deaths at the hands of American agression. The US can’t afford American deaths at the hand of American agression.
8
idontcare4284 days ago
+2
There is some merit to it. The Iranian regime would choose death over surrender. Sure, they can lose more infrastructure or personnel. But they will do this if they can force Americas hand, which they will do. Everyone talking like they are rational actors.
2
W313374 days ago
+1
With the new drones at mass warfare your aircraft carriers are basically sitting ducks, and ideal targets to severely humiliate the US.
1
GiraffeHat4 days ago
+3
Don't worry, with the insider trading they're also stealing millions from everyone else invested in the American stock market too. So rest assured, everyone is winning, with the exception of the general public and people being bombed.
Wait, what were we talking about again? Some guy cursed on the internet the other day.
3
Saratj14 days ago
+4
And Saudi Arabia and Ruzzia will be making bank all along the way. This is what winning looks like.
4
CruelStrangers4 days ago
+1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
Resistiane4 days ago
+1
Trump isn't doing shit. He'll just keep moving the deadline until he gets bored. He'll declare victory and pull everything out of the region. He doesn't do anything that doesn't personally profit him. An extended conflict with Iran doesn't do anything for him. This has all been theater.
1
Front_Promise_59914 days ago
+7
So when is time for bombing according to Trump? Today or tomorrow?
7
84Cressida4 days ago
+4
Tomorrow 8PM EST
4
izcenine4 days ago
+3
After market close.
3
pew-pew-bacca4 days ago
+4
>I am blowing up everything over there
His absolute need to put his name on everything even includes war crimes.
4
WeakBlueberry50714 days ago
+3
Who says trump has the cards? It's the Hormuz strait he wants and he can't get it, despite Iran's complete and total "obliteration"
3
GuitarGeezer4 days ago
+3
Trolling the ultimate troll.
🧌
Pro moves from Iran along with their propaganda ai videos. You got unreasonable demands? Hey, so do we!
3
Minute-Leg73464 days ago
-11
Iran can handle this economic pain far longer than the US and its Allies and that is what is key here.
-11
virtual_adam4 days ago
+41
This makes no sense. Iran is shut down. No flights, no freight, no offices, no schools, no trade. They are demanding $1T paid for financial hardship for the past month.
Americans are paying more at the gas station, but we haven’t seen any less usage in retail, credit cards, schools, vacations. Airports were as packed as any time in history this spring break
41
VaginalBelchh4 days ago
+62
What you’re missing is most eastern Asian nations are already rationing oil, entire supply chains don’t exist without it. Many industries are paused, costs are skyrocketing world wide and once inventory is gone Covid inflation will likely return.
It takes some time for this to truly hurt the world and US. But if this continued say for another few months, Iran could bring the world economy tumbling down. Oil isn’t just for powering cars, it’s absolutely vital in a TON of manufacturing and there isn’t an alternative.
US and Allie’s cannot ramp up production to meet the 20% of the worlds supply being cut off.
62
cattibri4 days ago
+19
Cost of fertiliser (a large % of which the lng runs through the strait for much of the world) has already doubled, for example
19
No-Yak-43604 days ago
+3
Another is Helium,, which is vital for the manufacture of cpus, gpus and the like.
3
IJustSignedUpToUp4 days ago
+19
Yeah, it was like that the week before COVID blew up too. And the month before the 2008 collapse before that. Bear Stearns was literally overnight.
The wild thing about the US vibes based economy is that it keeps trucking out over the cliff like Wiley Coyote, and then collapses immediately once it looks down.
19
Aromatic-Teacher-7174 days ago
+4
US is also relatively insulated from the consequences, but this won't last.
Iran doesn't care how many people die, and it's easy to make a case to even protesters that the country needs to unite against the nation firing on schools.
America will blink first. If it doesn't, the consequences will be ever more dire.
4
ReaperReader4 days ago
+4
If the Iranian regime falls, its current leaders will almost certainly wind up dead or broke and in exile. This war is an existentialist threat to the Iranian regime.
The stakes are fundamentally lower for the Americans, so the political willpower just isn't there in the USA.
4
whachamacallme4 days ago
+10
Yeah. But Iran can simply disappear any dissidents. So, in Iran, there is no hardship.
10
GhostsOf944 days ago
+2
A lot of those vacations are booked months in advance
2
caverunner174 days ago
+4
> Airports were as packed as any time in history this spring break
Most people book spring break trips months in advance.
4
_WhatchaDoin_4 days ago
+3
There are elections in the US. What about Iran? Who has control?
3
EkstraOst4 days ago
+6
They wont let you know, cause you just kill them
6
Parlayg0d4 days ago
+3
Cause listnook are idiots
3
Taiyoryu4 days ago
+2
Because the last of the shipments from the Gulf has not arrived to the US, yet. Also, some oil has been authorized for release from the strategic oil reserve. Once both those are finished, the US will be dealing with a shortage until demand goes down (via inflation) or supply is restored which will take months after the strait is opened. Even then, don’t expect prices to go down because the cost of reconstruction will be passed down to the consumer.
2
Bikrdude4 days ago
+1
That is not going to be changed by “surrendering “
1
NutsyFlamingo4 days ago
+6
Key to what?
6
Sqweaky_Clean4 days ago
+8
The question: who is going to fold first?
8
Ok-Enthusiasm31144 days ago
+4
Most likely Trump... and then afterwards he'll say it was his idea and his cult will call it a 4D chess move.
4
Lexinoz4 days ago
+6
TACO Tuesday is fast approaching
6
ScreenOk69284 days ago
+3
Attrition. Deploying 150 aircraft every time the US needs to rescue a single downed airman is not a sustainable strategy.
3
NutsyFlamingo4 days ago
+2
I’ve lost the plot.. so given the topic of article, you’re saying that because of attrition threat, Trump will recognize that reality and won’t escalate tomorrow?
2
ScreenOk69284 days ago
+9
Oh no, definitely not. That would imply the US has learned anything from its past 3 decades of foreign policy.
The more likely scenario is that US citizens are stuck funding another forever war for the forseeable future.
9
NutsyFlamingo4 days ago
+2
Yeah I’m not predicting outcomes.. just watching events.. my long term guess is as valuable as a UN letter of condemnation
2
Lpreddit4 days ago
+4
I don’t think it’s economic pain Iranian leadership needs to worry about. It’s the pain of having a bomb dropped on them.
4
Broken_Reality4 days ago
+11
I think they are pretty prepared seeing as they have been preparing for this for 40 years. They have also been bombed a lot lately and had many leaders killed.
Iran's plan of world economic pain except for those who aid Iran seems to be working. I know who I am upset with over the increase in petrol and food costs. It's not Iran. It's the Tangerine TACO and Netanyahu.
11
the_jokes_on_u4 days ago
+2
The only people they’re really hurting are predominantly Asian countries. Yes gas prices are going up in the US but this is no different than when it happened in 2001, 2008, 2011, 2012, 2021 and 2022. America has dealt with this before and on some occasions it was worse.
Iran fundamentally loses in the end. They’re in one of the worst modern day forms of hyper inflation, and before you say “they know how to be poor.” This is very different. They don’t have the means to rebuild. They’ve taken a bit more than triple their GDP in damages, all while their economy tanks harder than ever before. Not to mention the UAE is most likely going to be completely done with them after this. Their only chance for recovery is Russia and China bailing them out economically.
2
zeropage4 days ago
+6
Russia or China will 100% bail out Iran just for the oil and influence
6
Broken_Reality4 days ago
+5
I'm in the UK and for me petrol has gone up nearly 30 pence per litre. From £1.32 to £1.59. Has it been worse in the past? Sure it has. Did it need to be like this now? No it bloody didn't. This is entirely the choice of the Orange Muppet and Israel.
Just because things have been terrible before how does that change things now? In the UK we used to have rationing during and after WW2 does that mean it's fine if we had rationing again in the future?
It's doesn't matter who wins in the end. None of this needed to happen at all. They will have the means to rebuild because other countries will help Iran rebuild and gain from doing so. China would love to gain an even bigger foothold in the middle east and this will let them do so.
This whole thing is so pointlessly stupid. Before you say "But Iran is trying to make nukes!" Just who was it that tore up the Iran Nuclear deal? Oh right it was Trump in his first term because he couldn't stand Obama having made a deal with Iran and Trump hated Obama.
5
znebsays4 days ago
-2
Ah yes the typical Listnook arm chair general who has zero f****** clue
-2
Dripdry424 days ago
+1
It’s funny, there is no physical meeting, no evidence of talks, and the only person they can really get in touch with doesn’t have the ability to make any deals.
1
navcad4 days ago
+1
The Shiite aims will advance globally. Trump just gave a vulcanizing moment to a giant arc of disparate entities from the Southern Philippines through Indonesia, greater ASEAN to the Cuacuses and European Islamists. The reprisal from the coming unification won't just be dope-ass Lego dis videos. America and Israel are about to have a bad time. A
s an American Jew, I think it won't matter how liberal and angry you are towards the US or Israeli government. The reprisal will be asymmetrical and relentless. I just hope only the guilty planners are the sole targets.
1
anotherdamnscorpio3 days ago
+1
Peacemaxxxing
1
SortExcellent31543 days ago
+1
All the "trumpets" are doing the 'happy dance'. who ever would predict that America would threaten 'the total destruction of the Iranian civilisation". This talk keeps the 'trumpets' in their dancing shoes
127 Comments