· 127 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 6, 2026 at 6:32 PM

Iran sends "maximalist" peace plan response as Trump deadline looms

Posted by thejoshwhite



🚩 Report this post

127 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
CaptinLazerFace 4 days ago +762
Peacemaxing.
762
BigFuckHead_ 4 days ago +268
Warmogged, I'm afraid.
268
BanginNLeavin 4 days ago +166
Tomahawk -tuah'ed I'm against all this shit just wanted to hop on the band wagon.
166
ProductArizona 4 days ago +22
You're too good at this to be against it bro
22
wearebobNL 4 days ago +3
I snorted my tea thanks.
3
bradmccarthy 4 days ago +7
Works better if you drink it
7
skullshank 4 days ago +6
boof it!
6
Informal_Witness3869 4 days ago +13
I swear guys! This is the last one! This one truly be the one to end all wars!
13
Moderate-Extremism 4 days ago +1
Trump’s response: “I cherish peace with all of my heart. I don't care how many men, women and children I kill to get it.”
1
YakResident_3069 4 days ago +1
Putin school of how to make demands
1
[deleted] 4 days ago +380
[deleted]
380
555Cats555 4 days ago +217
Thanks for sharing the text. Its annoying when people post articles that are paywalled.
217
unknownkid0 4 days ago +7
Yeah, thanks for this. OP didn't think too much about posting this
7
bathroomheater 4 days ago +55
So what were the ten points?
55
Snotmyrealname 4 days ago +111
Per the [Kobeissi Letter](https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2041292793063121380) (Sorry for the twitter link, but it’s not up on xcancel yet) Iran's 10-point plan includes: 1. Guarantee that Iran will not be attacked again 2. Permanent end to the war, not just a ceasefire 3. End to Israeli strikes in Lebanon 4. Lifting of all US sanctions on Iran 5. End to all regional fighting against Iranian allies 6. In return, Iran would open the Strait of Hormuz 7. Iran would impose a Hormuz fee of $2 million per ship 8. Iran would split these fees with Oman 9. Iran to provide rules for safe passage through Hormuz 10. Iran to use Hormuz fees for reconstruction instead of reparations
111
The_Sneakiest_Fox 4 days ago +49
That seems... completely reasonable.
49
darrute 4 days ago +29
Which is why the US will never agree to it.
29
SporksInjected 4 days ago +6
I noticed there was nothing about nuclear materials in there
6
awesomface 4 days ago +28
They’re literally asking for more than they had even before the war without any concessions by them. It’s not reasonable in the slightest.
28
Hydronum 4 days ago +11
They didn't start the war, so kinda does seem reasonable.
11
Gunningham 4 days ago +5
2 million a ship sounds pretty steep, but I’m no expert.
5
The_Sneakiest_Fox 4 days ago +17
There are 2 million barrels on a ship, so it's a $1 surcharge per barrel, and they are asking for that to repair the damage the US has done. It's currently at $112 USD per barrel. Before the war started it was $60-$72 per barrel. So a lot less steep than the war tax we are currently paying.
17
Gunningham 4 days ago +10
Thanks for the context. Like I said. I’m not an expert.
10
jonknowzeverything 4 days ago +2
Its less about the money, but more about Iran having no rights to charge tolls on the international passage ways. Also, you give in, there is nothing stopping them from throwing a tantrum and bump it up to $2 some time later.
2
The_Sneakiest_Fox 4 days ago +5
>Its less about the money, but more about Iran having no rights to charge tolls on the international passage ways You mean like it was before the US started bombing their infrastructure for some vague, yet to be fully determined reason?
5
FerricDonkey 4 days ago +7
Remember that the Iranian government is evil and sponsors a massive amount of terrorism. That doesn't mean the US war was a good idea or well planned out, but it does mean that lifting sanctions and stopping hostilities against the terrorists they fund in Lebanon and other places is not actually a good idea. Hezbollah, hamas, etc are "allies of Iran" and are absolute scum, and there can't be a deal that just allows them to run wild.  So 3, 4, and 5 at minimum seem completely impossible. 
7
AGSattack 4 days ago +8
Exactly. Extremely frustrating.
8
BmacSOS 4 days ago +21
This guy announces his war crimes. What a piece of shit human being and stupid mother f*****. The whole world will suffer because his b**** baby ego is out of control. What a f****** psychopath.
21
aerobat3 4 days ago +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
MultiGeometry 4 days ago +3
45 day cease fire so that Trump can strong arm the GOP to approving more military funds for his war.
3
Moderate-Extremism 4 days ago +1
No, Iran is old news, all my homies are into Cuba now.
1
Paper_Clip100 4 days ago +7
Well if bibi says it, trumps gotta acquiesce
7
johncarlo08 4 days ago +1
Yeah what f****** bullshit. Bibi says no ceasefire so now that’s what Trump is going to do
1
UseDaSchwartz 4 days ago +1
Agree to not enrich uranium…you mean like what they agreed to before 2017?
1
Stinkfinger83 4 days ago +483
Trump wants peace, and he doesn’t care how may men, women, and children he has to kill to get it
483
Aggravating-Card-829 4 days ago +16
If this entire beach were dicks, I would suck every one of them in the name of peace!
16
344567653379643555 4 days ago +108
War is Peace.
108
Such_Difference_2248 4 days ago +58
Freedom is slavery
58
luveveryone 4 days ago +39
Ignorance is Strength
39
Late-Resolve9871 4 days ago +50
Statutory r*** is underaged consent
50
amakai 4 days ago +7
With current administration I finally fully understand the meaning behind all three. 
7
luveveryone 4 days ago +4
So very true
4
mentaljobbymonster 4 days ago +6
Poo is pee
6
Future-Raisin3781 4 days ago +26
We were never at war with Iran! We were always at war with Iran!
26
ThatchedRoofCottage 4 days ago +11
When they started claiming we’ve been at war with them for decades it felt a little on the nose. This shit is ridiculous.
11
Future-Raisin3781 4 days ago +12
"Don’t believe the c*** you see from these people, the fake news. … What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.” - Trump in 2018. https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/25/politics/donald-trump-vfw-unreality/
12
factoid_ 4 days ago +2
Don’t believe the evidence of your eyes and ears.  It was the party’s final, most essential command
2
Penqwin 4 days ago +1
De-escalation through escalation
1
findingmike 4 days ago +14
Peacemaker's speech is a favorite of mine
14
bigredthesnorer 4 days ago +17
I think he really wants the oil. I would not be surprised if that was his real reason, hidden behind the nuke and regime change BS. He thought Iran would be wiped out in a day and Kushner and Eric would be in there a week later making oil deals.
17
donniedarko1010 4 days ago +2
Bro he said it so himself today. Really i would love to have the oil but American people don't get it.
2
ogholycat 4 days ago +17
This guy gets it.
17
tootaflute 4 days ago +3
No not the children, he'll keep them for himself.
3
DamperBritches 4 days ago +1
He doesn't want peace, he just wants a peice
1
BreakChicago 4 days ago +17
Is Why It Matters a new mandatory section of every article? Or has AI already changed the formats it was supposed to mimic?
17
PmMeCuteDogsThanks_ 4 days ago +6
Not X. Not Y. Only Z. Here’s why it matters. 
6
MonkeyDeltaFoxtrot 4 days ago +20
Always ask for twice what you need, because you’ll only ever get half of what you want.
20
Narf234 4 days ago +42
Anyone have a paywall workaround?
42
InadequateUsername 4 days ago +10
Yeah I use IceRaven with Bypass Paywalls Clean extension installed.
10
deeweezul 4 days ago +2
Webpage archive usually works.
2
Time-Weekend-8611 3 days ago +1
Reload the page, and then stop loading before it's fully finished. If you time it right, you can hit the sweet spot after the page loads but before the paywall widget does. Easier on slower connections and phones.
1
BlipBlapBloppityBoop 4 days ago +36
Negotiating classically involves asking for too much and accepting what you hoped for. But given how bad Trump is at negotiating with himself, I wonder if the Iran regime’s best move is to set out a very clear checklist of demands (call them “needs”) for the strait to be left alone. And then just point to the list any time “negotiating” happens. Trump will just negotiate against himself while it remains clear to the rest of the world what exactly it is they want.
36
jared555 4 days ago +4
He always starts with the "screw you" price and gets upset when people either refuse to negotiate with him or when they start with the "screw you" counter. It is like if you were patient and looking to buy a home. The home is worth $100k. If the sellers starting asking price is $125k you might try making an offer of $90k and negotiate to $100k. With Trump he starts with a $1 million asking price and refuses to budge on it until he realizes he has a week left to sell and make a down payment where he is moving for a new job. Then ends up having to accept an offer of $50k.
4
misterxboxnj 4 days ago +62
I think they underestimated Iran's willingness to let it's people suffer so they can again blame America. Iran knows the longer they draw this out the higher oil prices will go and that hurts Trump and Israel and everyone will blame them for f****** up the world's economy for no good reason.
62
Fictional-adult 4 days ago +56
> Iran's willingness to let it's people suffer so they can again blame America There are many many negative things I could say about the Iranian regime, but in this instance they aren’t to blame.  We bombed their nuclear program in the 12 day war, and then reached a peace deal. We then struck them again shortly after. There’s no world in which they could accept a cease fire, because it essentially is just an acknowledgement that we will restock our supplies and resume hostilities.  Iran needs to get something out of a peace deal that actually ensures peace. 
56
LilyBelle504 4 days ago +13
Iran's regime: Ensures they have enough time to build up their nuclear program and reduce it's breakout time so next time someone attacks them they can stop it\* The US and Israel striking Iran's regime first in a conventional war, is really a function of Iran's regime being incapable for striking first. The regime knows if it kicked off a conventional war with ballistic missile strikes on US bases or Israel, they would get pummeled military, and they would be on the back-foot for diplomacy. So instead Iran's regime resorts to a shadow war as it's primary method. Fund militia proxy groups all over the region to destabilize your enemies, and keep them in a constant state of paranoia and wasting their resources combating them. All while the regime can "officially" keep its hands off and not let any of it's own soldiers die. Sure, the US and Israel fired the first "official" shots each time... But is it really that different than Iran's regime funding a 100,000 strong insurgent group in a foreign country, who routinely fires rockets into civilian centers- on their command?
13
CankleSteve 4 days ago +11
Generally I understand your realpolitik point here but, Iran knows its friends were few and now ever further limited. This mainly stems from their nuclear program. Their regime wants to eradicate Israel as a nation and pursuing nuclear options on the side is rightfully looked with skepticism. I’m no huge fan of Israel or of the settlers in the West Bank. However, the fact is Israel isn’t going anywhere outside of nuclear holocaust anytime soon and the world has a vested interest in not allowing nuclear holocausts.
11
555Cats555 4 days ago +38
Theres no point in agreeing to a "temporary" ceasefire. If the US and Isreal were serious about ending the war they could just withdraw troops and stop bombing... but at rhe very least Isreal has shown with Gaza they dont stick to peace deals. Isreal kept bombing pretty much right after a ceasefire was made in Gaza. Why would Iran take any kind of temporary ceasefire seriously. I dont blame Iran for wanting a stop to aggressions from Isreal and US before even considering any kind of serious negotiations.
38
RightHamster 4 days ago +18
Learned from mother Russia
18
Hentai_Yoshi 4 days ago +7
More like learned basic bargaining philosophy, which is kind of a political science
7
forg0tmypen 4 days ago +5
It’s basic negotiating. When I tried to evict my tenant years ago, 3 months in we went to mediation and they asked for $75,000 to give the keys back. Completely shook us. We said no and filed a court date and they eventually settled for far far less 4 months later. The point being is- asking for completely unrealistic compensation when you have nothing to lose by the other side saying no is a common tactic
5
Hungryforflavor 4 days ago +2
Too bad u still got hosed
2
Lokon19 4 days ago +8
lol of course Israel wants to keep going
8
BOPSurfcasting 4 days ago +40
Well, the gloves are off. We are all going to be paying for the rebuild in Iran through tolls that will be passed on through the pump.
40
Maleficent_Owl_7001 4 days ago +71
You must be joking. Trump is going to need to send both the Ford and the Lincoln in along with thousands of ground troops.  Iran has nothing to lose and they want American casualties.  And Trump played right into it as he is so f****** stupid.
71
whatproblems 4 days ago +44
and sounds like they’re firing all the competent people saying this is a terrible idea
44
Leftoverofferings 4 days ago +17
Or are they firing the competent people who say dropping a nuke on Iran is a war crime? Or are they firing anyone who won't support a coup staged by 🥭 for the midterms? All of the above?
17
yeroii 4 days ago +21
Iran leaders have plenty to lose yet. It's a test now who thinks can endure more comparative pain.
21
Grombrindal18 4 days ago +26
On the one side we have a country willing to massacre thousands of civilians for protesting, and on the other a president who is willing to throw soldiers into a meat grinder to distract from news of him being a sex criminal. This is going to get really bad for pretty much everyone.
26
WhoSaidWhatNow2026 4 days ago +7
>Iran has nothing to lose You people keep saying this and it has never been accurate.
7
it_diedinhermouth 4 days ago +8
Maybe it’s more true to say Iran , being a defender, can afford deaths at the hands of American agression. The US can’t afford American deaths at the hand of American agression.
8
idontcare428 4 days ago +2
There is some merit to it. The Iranian regime would choose death over surrender. Sure, they can lose more infrastructure or personnel. But they will do this if they can force Americas hand, which they will do. Everyone talking like they are rational actors.
2
W31337 4 days ago +1
With the new drones at mass warfare your aircraft carriers are basically sitting ducks, and ideal targets to severely humiliate the US.
1
GiraffeHat 4 days ago +3
Don't worry, with the insider trading they're also stealing millions from everyone else invested in the American stock market too. So rest assured, everyone is winning, with the exception of the general public and people being bombed. Wait, what were we talking about again? Some guy cursed on the internet the other day.
3
Saratj1 4 days ago +4
And Saudi Arabia and Ruzzia will be making bank all along the way. This is what winning looks like.
4
CruelStrangers 4 days ago +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
Resistiane 4 days ago +1
Trump isn't doing shit. He'll just keep moving the deadline until he gets bored. He'll declare victory and pull everything out of the region. He doesn't do anything that doesn't personally profit him. An extended conflict with Iran doesn't do anything for him. This has all been theater.
1
Front_Promise_5991 4 days ago +7
So when is time for bombing according to Trump? Today or tomorrow?
7
84Cressida 4 days ago +4
Tomorrow 8PM EST
4
izcenine 4 days ago +3
After market close.
3
pew-pew-bacca 4 days ago +4
>I am blowing up everything over there His absolute need to put his name on everything even includes war crimes.
4
WeakBlueberry5071 4 days ago +3
Who says trump has the cards? It's the Hormuz strait he wants and he can't get it, despite Iran's complete and total "obliteration"
3
GuitarGeezer 4 days ago +3
Trolling the ultimate troll. 🧌 Pro moves from Iran along with their propaganda ai videos. You got unreasonable demands? Hey, so do we!
3
Minute-Leg7346 4 days ago -11
Iran can handle this economic pain far longer than the US and its Allies and that is what is key here.
-11
virtual_adam 4 days ago +41
This makes no sense. Iran is shut down. No flights, no freight, no offices, no schools, no trade. They are demanding $1T paid for financial hardship for the past month. Americans are paying more at the gas station, but we haven’t seen any less usage in retail, credit cards, schools, vacations. Airports were as packed as any time in history this spring break
41
VaginalBelchh 4 days ago +62
What you’re missing is most eastern Asian nations are already rationing oil, entire supply chains don’t exist without it. Many industries are paused, costs are skyrocketing world wide and once inventory is gone Covid inflation will likely return. It takes some time for this to truly hurt the world and US. But if this continued say for another few months, Iran could bring the world economy tumbling down. Oil isn’t just for powering cars, it’s absolutely vital in a TON of manufacturing and there isn’t an alternative. US and Allie’s cannot ramp up production to meet the 20% of the worlds supply being cut off.
62
cattibri 4 days ago +19
Cost of fertiliser (a large % of which the lng runs through the strait for much of the world) has already doubled, for example
19
No-Yak-4360 4 days ago +3
Another is Helium,, which is vital for the manufacture of cpus, gpus and the like.
3
IJustSignedUpToUp 4 days ago +19
Yeah, it was like that the week before COVID blew up too. And the month before the 2008 collapse before that. Bear Stearns was literally overnight. The wild thing about the US vibes based economy is that it keeps trucking out over the cliff like Wiley Coyote, and then collapses immediately once it looks down.
19
Aromatic-Teacher-717 4 days ago +4
US is also relatively insulated from the consequences, but this won't last.  Iran doesn't care how many people die, and it's easy to make a case to even protesters that the country needs to unite against the nation firing on schools.  America will blink first. If it doesn't, the consequences will be ever more dire. 
4
ReaperReader 4 days ago +4
If the Iranian regime falls, its current leaders will almost certainly wind up dead or broke and in exile. This war is an existentialist threat to the Iranian regime. The stakes are fundamentally lower for the Americans, so the political willpower just isn't there in the USA.
4
whachamacallme 4 days ago +10
Yeah. But Iran can simply disappear any dissidents. So, in Iran, there is no hardship.
10
GhostsOf94 4 days ago +2
A lot of those vacations are booked months in advance
2
caverunner17 4 days ago +4
> Airports were as packed as any time in history this spring break Most people book spring break trips months in advance.
4
_WhatchaDoin_ 4 days ago +3
There are elections in the US. What about Iran? Who has control?
3
EkstraOst 4 days ago +6
They wont let you know, cause you just kill them
6
Parlayg0d 4 days ago +3
Cause listnook are idiots
3
Taiyoryu 4 days ago +2
Because the last of the shipments from the Gulf has not arrived to the US, yet. Also, some oil has been authorized for release from the strategic oil reserve. Once both those are finished, the US will be dealing with a shortage until demand goes down (via inflation) or supply is restored which will take months after the strait is opened. Even then, don’t expect prices to go down because the cost of reconstruction will be passed down to the consumer.
2
Bikrdude 4 days ago +1
That is not going to be changed by “surrendering “
1
NutsyFlamingo 4 days ago +6
Key to what?
6
Sqweaky_Clean 4 days ago +8
The question: who is going to fold first?
8
Ok-Enthusiasm3114 4 days ago +4
Most likely Trump... and then afterwards he'll say it was his idea and his cult will call it a 4D chess move.
4
Lexinoz 4 days ago +6
TACO Tuesday is fast approaching
6
ScreenOk6928 4 days ago +3
Attrition. Deploying 150 aircraft every time the US needs to rescue a single downed airman is not a sustainable strategy.
3
NutsyFlamingo 4 days ago +2
I’ve lost the plot.. so given the topic of article, you’re saying that because of attrition threat, Trump will recognize that reality and won’t escalate tomorrow?
2
ScreenOk6928 4 days ago +9
Oh no, definitely not. That would imply the US has learned anything from its past 3 decades of foreign policy. The more likely scenario is that US citizens are stuck funding another forever war for the forseeable future.
9
NutsyFlamingo 4 days ago +2
Yeah I’m not predicting outcomes.. just watching events.. my long term guess is as valuable as a UN letter of condemnation
2
Lpreddit 4 days ago +4
I don’t think it’s economic pain Iranian leadership needs to worry about. It’s the pain of having a bomb dropped on them.
4
Broken_Reality 4 days ago +11
I think they are pretty prepared seeing as they have been preparing for this for 40 years. They have also been bombed a lot lately and had many leaders killed. Iran's plan of world economic pain except for those who aid Iran seems to be working. I know who I am upset with over the increase in petrol and food costs. It's not Iran. It's the Tangerine TACO and Netanyahu.
11
the_jokes_on_u 4 days ago +2
The only people they’re really hurting are predominantly Asian countries. Yes gas prices are going up in the US but this is no different than when it happened in 2001, 2008, 2011, 2012, 2021 and 2022. America has dealt with this before and on some occasions it was worse. Iran fundamentally loses in the end. They’re in one of the worst modern day forms of hyper inflation, and before you say “they know how to be poor.” This is very different. They don’t have the means to rebuild. They’ve taken a bit more than triple their GDP in damages, all while their economy tanks harder than ever before. Not to mention the UAE is most likely going to be completely done with them after this. Their only chance for recovery is Russia and China bailing them out economically.
2
zeropage 4 days ago +6
Russia or China will 100% bail out Iran just for the oil and influence
6
Broken_Reality 4 days ago +5
I'm in the UK and for me petrol has gone up nearly 30 pence per litre. From £1.32 to £1.59. Has it been worse in the past? Sure it has. Did it need to be like this now? No it bloody didn't. This is entirely the choice of the Orange Muppet and Israel. Just because things have been terrible before how does that change things now? In the UK we used to have rationing during and after WW2 does that mean it's fine if we had rationing again in the future? It's doesn't matter who wins in the end. None of this needed to happen at all. They will have the means to rebuild because other countries will help Iran rebuild and gain from doing so. China would love to gain an even bigger foothold in the middle east and this will let them do so. This whole thing is so pointlessly stupid. Before you say "But Iran is trying to make nukes!" Just who was it that tore up the Iran Nuclear deal? Oh right it was Trump in his first term because he couldn't stand Obama having made a deal with Iran and Trump hated Obama.
5
znebsays 4 days ago -2
Ah yes the typical Listnook arm chair general who has zero f****** clue
-2
Dripdry42 4 days ago +1
It’s funny, there is no physical meeting, no evidence of talks, and the only person they can really get in touch with doesn’t have the ability to make any deals.
1
navcad 4 days ago +1
The Shiite aims will advance globally. Trump just gave a vulcanizing moment to a giant arc of disparate entities from the Southern Philippines through Indonesia, greater ASEAN to the Cuacuses and European Islamists. The reprisal from the coming unification won't just be dope-ass Lego dis videos. America and Israel are about to have a bad time. A s an American Jew, I think it won't matter how liberal and angry you are towards the US or Israeli government. The reprisal will be asymmetrical and relentless. I just hope only the guilty planners are the sole targets.
1
anotherdamnscorpio 3 days ago +1
Peacemaxxxing
1
SortExcellent3154 3 days ago +1
All the "trumpets" are doing the 'happy dance'. who ever would predict that America would threaten 'the total destruction of the Iranian civilisation". This talk keeps the 'trumpets' in their dancing shoes
1
← Back to Board