Neither side has control of the strait. Each side has effective blockade capability. Control would imply Iran can force its tankers through to export.
201
agswiens2 days ago
+37
Exactly, right now everyone is losing in the Strait.
37
Ismhelpstheistgodown1 day ago
Trump’s Chernobyl or “why the world can’t have nice things”.
0
Minimum-Paint-96492 days ago
-50
Yes but Iran gains more each second it is closed. America is losing and this was catastrophically stupid.
-50
EquivalentOne2412 days ago
+46
There has been mass layoffs and redundancies in Iran. Their economy was already down the gutter before the war, but things have gotten only worse after the war.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce84e31376zo
46
Ready_Data52062 days ago
-27
There are mass layoffs happening in the USA as well. Inflation is going up due to high energy prices and growth is slowing down.
-27
CFOMaterial2 days ago
+17
Not even close to the same scale. Their entire economy is based around oil. We just have 1-5% higher prices on goods, while the GDP of the country is still probably going up because oil we produce here can sell for more.
17
Ready_Data52062 days ago
-26
This was estimated to be a 3 day war by Trump and team, now going into the second month. The costs of this are already way beyond what Trump or the US had calculated. Meanwhile Iran is the same country that has been sanctioned and blockaded for 50 plus years. So don't get your hopes up.
-26
Bomblehbeh2 days ago
+21
Iran has been blockaded for 50 plus years? Not sure your statements have much credibility..
21
Borne2Run2 days ago
+47
Iran is funded by oil revenue. They do not have oil revenue right now. They have finite storage capacity, and compounding costs once that storage capacity is reached.
47
Behemothheek2 days ago
+33
How? Oil is heart of Iran’s economy and Iran exports the vast majority of its oil via the sea. The US is only hurt because its Gulf allies are hurt.
33
StoneColdEgon2 days ago
-23
Oil is the heart of the entire world.
And Iran is preventing 20% of its global supply.
-23
EquivalentOne2412 days ago
+21
Iran is only preventimg about 8 - 10% of oil supply.
- Saudis are exporting 7m bpd of their oil via pipeline to Yanbu port in the Red sea.
- UAE is exporting from Fujairah port on the Arabian sea
- Iraq is also exporting some oil via Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline to Turkey
Meanwhile, hit to Iranian economy which heavily relies on oil exports is massive. It was already in bad shape before the war, therefore they had massive protests.
21
StoneColdEgon2 days ago
-10
100m barrels per day are consumed, 20m goes through the strait per day. They’re blocking 20m of the 100m the world consumes daily. Also, saudis pipelines can only handle 5m at most (if everything is completely perfect)
What you’re claiming isn’t showing up anywhere, gas, oil, and energy are just as high, so where is this 20m that’s being “rerouted” at?????
Also, iran is fucked from the sanctions anyways, if they can stop 20% of the worlds daily oil production… then yeah, I think every sensible person agrees trashing the global economy >>> trashing Irans economy
-10
EquivalentOne2412 days ago
+5
>saudis pipelines can only handle 5m at most (if everything is completely perfect)
SCMP article mentioned 7m bpd, but I think that's total capacity of the pipeline. Exports are actually constrained by the port infrastructure and loading capacity.
https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3350671/iran-war-escalates-houthis-threaten-sever-saudi-oil-exports
>What you’re claiming isn’t showing up anywhere, gas, oil, and energy are just as high, so where is this 20m that’s being “rerouted” at?????
I didn't never claimed all of the 20% is being re-routed. Go read my comment again. I said not all 20% supply is being blocked as some of it is being diverted through existing pipelines to other ports.
There are other factors in the play too.
- Demand destruction, especially in poor countries
- increased supply from other regions, especially from North and South America
- Release of oil from strategic reserves
5
swedishplayer972 days ago
+14
And the blockade is preventing 100% of Iran's sales.
14
StoneColdEgon2 days ago
-11
Yes. 100% of Irans sales + 20% of the worlds oil. Both can happen at the same time. LOL
-11
nvidiastock1 day ago
+1
So if the world has access to 80% of the worlds oil and Iran has access to 0% of it's oil export revenue, what makes you think Iran will outlast the world?
1
StoneColdEgon1 day ago
+1
I never said “Iran survives a blockade just fine and will last forever”
I literally said 100% of Irans sales are blocked and 20% of the worlds oil is blocked.
That means Iran is fucked, just like how the Republicans are fucked bc they’re causing the worlds oil, gas, and energy to skyrocket.
Ik you want to defend trumps new Iran war, but it isn’t good for anyone and it’s going to obviously cost republicans bc no one wants -20% production in gas, oil, and energy
And if you think f****** 20% of the world’s daily oil is fine…? Then you’re delusional.
1
nvidiastock23 hr ago
+2
I think we spoke past each other. I think trump got played by his own arrogance and with a gentle push from Bibi. This war is not in the US's interest at all. But you were initially making it sound like Iran is fine. They're not.
2
StoneColdEgon23 hr ago
+2
Saying Iran is stopping 20% of the worlds oil while the us is blockading their ports in return is just a normal matter of fact about the conflict.
Don’t think that’s saying either the us, Iran, or the world is doing fine or better off
2
Amoral_Abe2 days ago
+7
Over 50% of Iran's GDP is oil and gas of which over 90% ships through the strait. They instituted a blockade which hurts the globe and puts pressure on the US. The US blockaded them which hurts Iran. If Iran cannot get oil out, they will have to shut down their wells which is difficult to turn back on again and cannot be done immediately. Iran is on a more dire timer than the US is. Iran will likely begin threatening to attack desalination plants and oil infrastructure of gulf states if the US doesn't stop. Trump will likely threaten to target Iran's desalination plants and infrastructure if they do.
Basically both sides refuse to step down but both sides are hurting. Trump is a Pedo POS who is hurting the US and needs to be removed. However, the Iranian regime has executed well over 1,000 protesters after the protests and further massacred thousands more during them. And Israel is led by Netanyahu who is destroying Israel to remain in power and will likely have turned most of the Arab world against them. There are no good sides here.
7
StoneColdEgon2 days ago
-6
I think everyone can agree, trashing the global economies most valuable industry >>>> trashing Irans economy.
Remember, those gulf oil countries economies are fucked too, and anyone/everyone who relies on gas, oil, or energy is fucked everywhere. That’s bigger than Iran.
-6
Minimum-Paint-96492 days ago
-7
Totally agree. Throw in Israeli and the Gulf Monarchs and it’s a buffet of shitty gov and people.
-7
Minimum-Paint-96492 days ago
-19
Irans been sanctioned for what two decades now? I understand it hurts Iran but America is most certainly directly impacted if only by higher prices and our pain tolerance is zero. That’s not touching on the damage done to US credibility globally, to the petrodollar, US military and a total failure to achieve any strategic adjectives.
-19
Behemothheek2 days ago
+8
And yet despite the Western sanctions they continue to export oil. Almost of its oil, like 80%-90%, is exported to China. Also I haven’t even mentioned how Iran was just only allowing some boats through the strait at a $2m/tanker premium, giving them tons of regional influence - which they lose when the strait is closed.
I’m not disagreeing that this war has been a disaster, but Iran almost certainly feels the effects of keeping the strait closed more.
8
RazzleLikesCandy2 days ago
+12
Ignorant comment, considering the US is way less dependent on middle eastern oil than Iran is on exporting theirs.
Also, their military complex is in shambles, they bring nothing but suffering to their people.
12
Little-Chemical50062 days ago
-10
Their voters isnt. US isnt isolated from global oil price fluctuations.
-10
greenmachine112352 days ago
+11
The US is a net exporter of oil. Prives aren't increasing in the US because of domestic shortage, they're increasing due to foriegn shortage so sellers are choosing to sell to overseas customers rather than in the US to maximize profits.
11
Colbert20202 days ago
+2
By what metric is Iran gaining more? Their oil exports have been squeezed dry.
I'm not saying things are better now for the world than they were before the USA invaded, but to say "Iran is winning" from this situation is out of touch with reality.
2
BlueHighwindz2 days ago
-23
"He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing."
-23
tang_ar_quet2 days ago
+20
TIL that I control all glassware, ceramic, and even electronic stores 😎
20
sarges_12gauge2 days ago
+25
Ok, there are dozens of countries that can destroy a tanker in the strait, you telling me they all control it?
25
noir_lord2 days ago
-7
It's area denial.
As long as Iran maintains a capability to hit ships transitting they can shut it off at will, that is effectively control since they can deny an asset to someone else who wants it.
The US can also do it but if both side blockades its who comes out worst *fastest* who will yield first and Iran/IRGC probably can last long enough to plough the world economy into the ground knowing the US will get the *blame*.
Any country with a blue water navy *could* but they'd have to be willing to pay the price internationally, Iran *is* because from their PoV they've nothing to lose.
It's why successive US governments haven't done the stupid thing, this one chose to do the stupid thing.
The IRGC are monsters but this was *always* going to be the end result, they've never hidden it, this shit goes back to the 80's, Tanker Wars/Operation Preying Mantis.
-7
sarges_12gauge2 days ago
+9
Well I’m saying that’s why it’s misleading to say Iran controls it and simultaneously saying they can’t use it. I understand denial is a pretty low bar, which is why I don’t understand why so many people want to say “control” instead of “denial” just to… I guess highlight in rhetoric how they feel?
9
BlueHighwindz2 days ago
-11
Uhhh... yes, actually. It only works if there's a gentlemen's agreement to not blow each other up.
-11
sarges_12gauge2 days ago
+13
Well I think it’s a misleading quote because it redefines “control” from how anybody normally thinks about it.
The US and Iran both “control” strait shipping because they can stop it, yet neither can use it the strait as they please, doesn’t sound like either actually has control
13
[deleted]2 days ago
-6
[deleted]
-6
Borne2Run1 day ago
+5
"Control" is being politicized as a term by both belligerent seeking to buttress their domestic political support. Both have timelines; Iran with their physical storage capacity and the US with its War Powers Act limits absent congressional AUMF action.
5
CraftyPerformance2722 days ago
+63
By that logic the USA controls the Strait Since they could just attack in a civilian boats passing by like Iran does.
63
Do_itsch2 days ago
-45
Didnt the US bomb fishing boats in another region and were saying they were drug dealers? I know it has nothing to do with Iran, but the US doesnt seem much better currently..
-45
CraftyPerformance2722 days ago
-25
What's crazy is Iran religious extremist government is an extreme version of MAGA that the left hates but for some reason you people defend Iran literally. It's actually insane. You people don't like MAGA because you say they are taking women's rights away such as abortion rights. Iran treats women like property and has been oppressing them for decades. You don't like MAGA because they are against gay marriage... Iran kills gay people. You people dont like MAGA because those two ICE protesters were killed... Iran killed 30,000 protesters just this year.
Why do so many people like critical thinking skills? Just because you dislike Israel and the USA Doesn't mean you should Support and celebrate Iran.
-25
CobblerMoney96052 days ago
+9
I've not seen a single post defending Iran.
I have seen a lot of posts saying Trump's an idiot for tearing up the treaty that was in place and attacking Iran. I'm betting that's what has you upset.
No intelligent American supports MAGA because they are fascist.
9
MUNCHINonBABI3Z2 days ago
+7
You should stop thinking “intelligent” people don’t support MAGA. It’s confusing to me how otherwise “intelligent people” seem to have such backwards world views. But MAGA supporters are in board rooms and running companies all over the country. They’re doctors, lawyers, and engineers. I’m not defending them or trying to make them seem like “good” people, but it’s not just abunch of dumb rednecks either.
7
spatenfloot2 days ago
+7
no one said they like those things
7
CraftyPerformance2722 days ago
-20
Plenty of brainwashed people on Listnook have some things like " women and gay people are safer in Iran and have more rights than in Trump's America"... They defend Iran attacking civilian boats and laying mines in international waters. They defend Iran funding terrorists or attacking civilians in surrounding counties.
-20
Do_itsch2 days ago
+3
Nobody is defending Iran here. That wasnt the point.
3
CraftyPerformance2722 days ago
-23
Crazy biased blinds you so much.
-23
Evenfall2 days ago
+3
Yikes, you need deprogramming. Reality is colored far different than your perception. You need to work on that.
3
CraftyPerformance2722 days ago
-1
It's just sad people like you ignore and consume Pro terrorist propaganda. Literally in all of these posts about Iran you have people celebrating and cheering for the IRGC. When people mention Iran killing 30,000 protesters every time you have tons of people denying it saying they only killed rioters or that Iran said the number was only 3,000 and you should totally trust them. When Iran destroyed that first civilian boat, when they put down mines, when they attacked multiple other unconnected countries boats in the comments most of the people were literally cheering them on and praising them.
What sad is before the back when Iran killed 30,000 people and shut off the internet besides of course all the people defending Iran and their government. You literally had tons of people on Listnook saying " nobody should interfere governments can do what they want to their citizens"
-1
Evenfall2 days ago
+5
Dude you are so off base here you cannot see it. No one is defending Iran. You use the internet as anectodes but you completely ignore that half of all internet traffic is AI. You have literally been programmed to think the way you do which is opposition of what reality is.
Seriously, get better information sources. You sound crazy here.
5
thewavefixation1 day ago
+1
Who are the 'you people' lmao. No one defends Iran.
1
CraftyPerformance2721 day ago
+2
Really. Nobody.
2
themanwiththeOZ2 days ago
+1
I am actually genuinely, honestly interested in your view of the Epstein files and those who lurk within them. Mind sharing?
1
CraftyPerformance2722 days ago
+2
I just think people are hypocrites and don't actually care about a lot of these things unless it hurts things they don't like. Look at slavery for example were the UN has to go out and say " this few hundred years of Western slavery was the worst thing ever". People ignore the thousands of years of slavery before USA slavery. Even more crazy people ignore the fact there are more slaves today in the world than their were when the USA abolished slavery. But because most of the slavery is happening in Africa and the Middle East people don't care.
Similar to all the people that pretend to care about the Epstein stuff because they pretend to care about kids. You had Democrats and Republicans covering up Epstein and similar things for decades. I keep seeing posts defending Iran like " at least they're not in the Epstein list". And Iran you literally have 100,000 plus child marriages a year. In a lot of countries in Africa in the Middle East that number is much higher. I just think it's sad that people don't care about the Millions of children around the world each year that are forced into marriages with adults or sold into slavery.
Similar how people pretend to care about Gaza because of how horrible it is... Why don't they care about Sudan or other genocides going on around the world that are killing a lot more people than gaza? It's because people don't actually care. They want to be trendy. Just like people pretended to care about China having a million Muslims in concentration / reeducation camps and they pretended to care about what China was doing to Hong Kong... within a few years those people got bored and now just don't care and ignore it.
When Epstein and Maxwell was arrested you could probably trust the Epstein files if they actually started to go after the co-conspirators immediately. However you had years with Democrats in charge and now years with Republicans in charge and mix in some hacks in between so who knows what has been removed, added or changed.
2
Teripid2 days ago
-1
Plenty of crazy and oppressive governments. Heck women just got the right to drive in SA. Lots of places without free speech, etc.
We didn't bomb Iran for women's rights treatment and using it to justify this quagmire is idiotic.
I don't celebrate Iran but I recognize a manufactured crisis with no long-term plan. Mission Accomplished but dumber.
The history of Iran and US/British involvement is a fascinating read too...
-1
CraftyPerformance2722 days ago
+2
Do you think the world would be safe if Iran had nuclear weapons?
2
Teripid1 day ago
+1
I don't think the world is safe in part because the US does. The number of "end of times" Christians is frightening and that religious rhetoric is frankly terrifying.
I think golden opportunities were squandered and the ultimate impact will be horrible economically and in terms of the human toll.
So here we are. What's the long-term plan? Because our current outlook is always at most 2 weeks away and seems more focused on spiking the price of crude in a semi-predictable manner.
1
Hevens-assassin2 days ago
-1
Oh, so the double think is working well and good in that little noggin of yours, huh? Ironic that you critique someone else's thinking skills when you just regurgitate what MAGA wants you to.
Nobody supports Iran's regime. Full stop.
The left is pissed that the U.S. and Israel have unnecessarily attacked the country, leading to more deaths, and those 30,000 protestors you're so concerned about are now going to go up even more because hey, they received support from the U.S., and who is currently making life a living hell? Oh, the U.S. and Israel.
Trump is a warmonger who wants Iranian resources. He doesn't give a f*** about the uranium. He doesn't give a f*** about the people. He wants what's under their ground, and it's very obvious if you listen AT ALL to what he's saying. Israel also wanted a distraction from Palestine and an excuse to kill people, and Trump was happy to be manipulated into it.
Grow. The. F***. Up. MAGA are fascist hopefuls, and Iran's regime are fascist actuals. THE LEFT WANTS IRANIANS TO NOT BE CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE OF A WORTHLESS WAR.
Let me say that in another way in case those words don't work. LIBERALS DON'T WANT UNNECESSARY WARS TO START.
Or maybe: THE LEFT WANTS IRAN TO SOLVE ITS PROBLEMS OUT, NOT BE BOMBED INTO SUBMISSION AND CREATE TOMORROW'S TERRORISTS.
-1
CraftyPerformance2722 days ago
+7
So nobody supports iran? The terrorists across the world that are killing people in the name of Iran aren't supporting them? The protests around the world that are pro Iran and who support the religious dictator didn't support iran? The people that are praising the irgc don't support iran?
And Iran did try to solve its own problems but then the government shut off the internet and killed 30,000 protesters.
7
emperorhaplo2 days ago
When did the far right wing supporters of Iran’s theocracy who are praising the irgc become “the left” that you mention in your initial comment? Dude you’re crazy and need some mental counseling and de-programming because you’re regurgitating incoherent and contradictory points of view. Or you’re a bot.
0
Hevens-assassin2 days ago
-4
Your algorithm does all your thinking for you, huh?
People support the Iranian people. They don't want the president of the United States to threaten to "wipe out a civilization" (his words, not mine).
People don't want the U.S. or Israel in there because, believe it or not, those protestors you claim to care about will be the tip of the iceberg.
And yes, Russia and China support Iran. You get a lot of bot farms in support of them, just like you do for a bunch of other bullshit.
Funny you're saying "the people who _____" as if that's a good excuse. The American people have had mass protests against their current regime. What should they do next?
-4
CraftyPerformance2722 days ago
+5
You people don't care about the Iranian people. Or you'd care about the 30,000 civilians Iran's government killed.
5
Hevens-assassin1 day ago
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I love your argument. 6000-30,000 protestors died, so it's ok for a foreign government to come in and bomb the place, and then threaten to bomb power and water stations (a war crime, btw), invade ANOTHER country, and then hold the world hostage, causing to even more deaths.
American Exceptionalism at work here. If you cared about those protestors you keep using as a shield (which is extremely gross that you repeatedly use that as an excuse for more death), you wouldn't be cheering that a foreign government wants to bomb the shit out of a country full of innocents. You would ALSO know that because of these attacks, those protestors are now EVEN MORE AT RISK OF RETALIATION. Great job, your 5head is working overtime to justify a war that even your leadership has admitted it doesn't give a shit about the people in the country they are bombing. Keep cheering for war, I guess. Though I hope you're first in line for enlistment to go fight it.
0
PanneKopp2 days ago
-13
it looks like Trump has no cards (again), his counterpart does not even wear a suit
-13
[deleted]2 days ago
+17
[deleted]
17
nediamnori2 days ago
+8
The fact that Iran loses does not mean the US wins.
8
ButterscotchTop1942 days ago
+8
And how's that been working out for the world over the last 60 days?
Trump has claimed countless times the war is won.
It's clearly not won.
8
[deleted]2 days ago
-2
[deleted]
-2
ButterscotchTop1942 days ago
+1
Agreed. But as the president, his words have to have meaning.
A sixth grader can tell Trump is lying and that the war hasn't been won. That's precisely because Iran does infact still have cards, as Trump would put it.
1
Background_Cause_9922 days ago
+14
Although you're right, Iran has been hardening and planning fir sanctions for years.
Im not sure Trump can survive these fuel prices indefinitely.
So the leverage situation ain't so clear cut
14
Pockydo2 days ago
+7
It's the office episode with the Micheal Scott paper company
Iran doesn't have to outlast the US. just trump midterms are coming
7
Special_Ad7122 days ago
+2
There are hawks on both sides of the parties. It’s untenable for Iran to maintain control of the strait of Hormuz to choke out global trade and effectively charge tolls. America still has a ton of escalatory options as well as the rest of the gulf states. IMO at its current stage, it either ends in massive civilian infrastructure being bombarded and boots on the ground.
Not like Trump pays attention to Congress anyways….
2
[deleted]2 days ago
-8
[deleted]
-8
Great_Incident_15252 days ago
+5
Yeah I agree it's probably the cost of everything related to oil production going up that actually does it... gas, energy (LG), groceries, electronics (He shortages anyone), deliveries charges, flight costs.
As it continues to errode spending power beyond just gas I guess we can all see what happens.
This sure as shit isn't reducing costs for all of us or lowering prices or releasing the Epstein files. Seems like alot of promises going unfulfilled.
It's also entirely possible showing the Catholic voting block what you think of the Pope wasn't a genius move.
5
dz45052 days ago
+3
That’s not how a global economy works.
Why did the oil price doubled at the pump during the worst part of the war when nothing changed - we produce more than we consume.
We also use byproducts of oil like fertilizer, which will affect food price. The process of oil makes so much things we use in our daily life.
3
[deleted]2 days ago
[deleted]
0
dz45052 days ago
+1
Ironically Russia is benefitting from this since they have a lot more oil than they need.
I don’t know about China situation currently so I won’t comment on it as anything I say would be speculation on my part.
1
Background_Cause_9922 days ago
-2
Calling the democratic party left at the minute is a bit Rich, and they're probably going to pivot even further away from progressives for the midterms. To what end I'm not sure, but they're nothing if not predictable
-2
Zequen2 days ago
-3
Idk about that. Still has another dollar to go up before it matches Bidens gas prices. It was 4.50/gallon during 2022 or 23. Its only 3.50 right now here. People need to stop fear mongering high gas prices being the end of trump. It will take more than this, as we have already been through worse. People have such a short memory its crazy.
-3
Frost_ksw2 days ago
Meanwhile Iran has the straight of hormuz closed, the threat of striking us bases, Israel, US Gulf Allies, cyber operations, striking tankers and the blockade, every single one of their proxys which can escalate in different countries, terrorist cells and finally the red sea which if attacked will send the price of everything sky rocketing even higher and put our alliances with other countries on the brink. Nevermind the fact they can look to China and Russia to exert more pressure.
So no. In fact we do not have more cards than them.
0
[deleted]2 days ago
-3
[deleted]
-3
Frost_ksw2 days ago
+3
The current war is already a regional conflict, it just hasn't further escalated to boots on the ground. Because the US and Allies know it would be suicide on all fronts. The only way to remove all these proxies and Iran is to take control of their territory and flush them out. Good luck trying to convince anyone sane to get stuck fighting in Iran, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen.
Iran has the advantage because they have more tools to inflict pain on the US and Allies while their nation has a higher tolerance to withstand. (partially because how badly we ruined their country already and because the regime doesn't care about its citizens) Regardless if we produce the most oil, shipping routes being closed still hurts everybody. Iran blowing up the Gulf still hurts everybody. Except two countries who benefit from the US getting stuck in a long term war which is hurting the nation.
3
Easik2 days ago
-9
None of that is leverage for the US over Iran. Its mutually assured destruction at this point.
-9
[deleted]2 days ago
+5
[deleted]
5
Easik2 days ago
+3
No. The IRGC does not care about any of that. If the US escalates, then Iran will blow up UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, etc oil/lng infrastructure and close the strait of bab al mandeb.
3
[deleted]2 days ago
+2
[deleted]
2
Easik2 days ago
-1
Cool, so why isn't the strait open? Oh that's right, the US has no leverage to open it.
-1
nfstern2 days ago
+6
At the end of the day, facts on the ground tell the story to anyone who is paying attention. It's still closed like you wrote.
6
[deleted]2 days ago
+1
[deleted]
1
Easik2 days ago
+4
I disagree with your assessment of the situation. You haven't brought out any new concepts or taught me anything, you've just drawn a different conclusion from the facts. The fact is the strait has been effectively been closed for 55 days with no end in sight. If the US had any leverage, then it would have opened the strait weeks ago. We know that Iran does not care about its people and the US just released $6 billion, so this regime will have plenty of funding for many months.
Also framing it like you are trying to teach me something is laughable and a bit pathetic.
4
[deleted]2 days ago
+4
[deleted]
4
Grazziellone2 days ago
+2
Massive retaliation how? It's a country the size of Alaska and 90 million people, heavily militarized, with decentralized military command which has basically absolute power. The territory is very mountainous which is perfect for asymmetric warfare. They have been subject to sanctions for decades and bombardments for weeks.
What do they have left to lose? How can any coalition imagine to win a ground invasion, or win without one? As long as they control the strait, and they do, they win because time is on their side
2
rhino3692 days ago
+2
They have a lot to lose. If Iran attacks economic targets in the Gulf, the US and the Gulf states can hit them back much harder.
Iran can cost billions in damages. But they themselves are extremely vulnerable to air strikes on economic targets. The US could turn off their power and blow up their oil production.
That’s not happening now because Iran can retaliate. But if Iran does it first the gloves come off.
2
Frost_ksw2 days ago
To assume that the gulf states have anything meaningful to provide in a war against Iran is delusional. If they did they would've struck back already. Their militaries are weak and dependent on foreign actors which is why they need the US, China, Israel and more recently Ukraine. There's nothing they can do to Iran that we haven't done several times over.
Meanwhile we've bombed everything they have except oil fields and Iran is still standing and retaliating. Which will become worse if we go through with bombing the oil fields as Iran will choose the last resort option and do the same to everyone else, plus things they haven't done before.
They have a lot to lose but so do we.
0
[deleted]2 days ago
+1
[deleted]
1
Grazziellone2 days ago
+3
It's true that US and allies could ramp up retaliation, but consider that the US has used 20% of precision missile stockpile and 50% of patriot missiles, so they cannot afford to keep a higher intensity of missile strikes for long.
On the naval side, Iran has dozen, if not hundreds, of speedboats designed specifically to swarm and sink larger cruisers. They don't have large ships but again, asymmetric warfare, they don't actually need them to deny US boat access to the strait.
On the political side, the recent events have actually increased the political power of the military compared to the religious factions, and it made a regime change less likely. It won't definitely be achieved by strikes alone.
If a full scale military confrontation would happen, well, Iran is 5 times the size of Vietnam and they have been preparing for this scenario for decades. If it was open terrain, like in desert storm, then the US would win easily. Invading Iran would be a slow and painful defeat
3
Nightbal2 days ago
In a state of war, sanctions lose a lot of their bite. The whole idea is premised on the belief that economics will prevent violence, when they are the forces that enable it.
When at war, a social orders harden. Sure, there is a breaking point somewhere, but it’s measured in years, not weeks
0
Theverybest922 days ago
-1
So I don't get it our navy is growing food on the boats?
-1
ButterscotchTop1942 days ago
-5
If Trump just thanked the ayatollah, we could all get back to normal.
-5
PanneKopp2 days ago
-3
for nobody talking about the Epsein files any more ?
-3
Expert_Bag74162 days ago
-20
Pathetic little speed boats with terrorists, you call that control?
-20
Inko212 days ago
+48
Asking the question "are tankers moving at this moment" should give you an answer to that.
48
shadyjim2 days ago
+5
Rumour is those speed boats are actively mining the strait.
5
RobertJ932 days ago
+10
Easiest way to check- is the strait closed when it is normally open? And is it closed because of Iran?
Then yes, they have control…
Is the apparatus of that control solid? Absolutely not. They are a fractured country with competing military forces and heavily reduced capabilities. But still, they do have control.
10
[deleted]2 days ago
[removed]
0
whyuhavtobemad2 days ago
+2
I doubt anyone thinks Iran is winning or stronger then US army. The question is how long can the world sustain a closed strait
2
[deleted]2 days ago
[removed]
0
Astralsketch2 days ago
+3
unfortunately, america is the world empire and it will suffer greatly if the world economy takes a tumble. Iran is insulated from that, having been under sanctions for a while.
3
TheBatemanFlex2 days ago
That is how terrorist states "win". They make everyone hurt. Then eventually the US will pay off enough leaders to do their terrorism elsewhere, or the gulf states will pay off enough to POTUS to give up. By no metric can you say the US is winning in that scenario.
0
MeNoweakneSS2 days ago
-15
Sad trombone!
Come on USA oust that incompetent thug already!
111 Comments