ListNook

Mana_Seeker Apr 6, 2026 +800

Excerpt "DUBAI, April 6 (Reuters) - U.S. forces located on Kuwait's Bubiyan island were targeted by ‌Iran, the spokesperson of Iran's Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters said in a video statement shared by state media ⁠on Monday. Ebrahim Zolfaqari said Iran targeted satellite equipment and munitions on the island with drones, adding that U.S. forces had relocated there from Arifjan camp after that base ‌was ⁠repeatedly struck by Iran." Note: article title's "military spokesperson" refers to Iran, not US source

800

Brambletail Apr 6, 2026 +286

Note the "targeted" whereas the news reported "struck". Do we have news of whether or not the strike actually landed?

286

Lynorisa Apr 6, 2026 +63

Is it not two locations?

63

Yodfather Apr 6, 2026 +63

Yep. Bubiyan is an island off Kuwait City. Arifjian is in the southern Kuwaiti desert.

63

Quiet_Down_Please Apr 6, 2026 +41

It's crazy to me that Arifjan is a target in a war after basically being a small, laid back army base with restaurants and stuff for the better part of 30 years... When I was deployed we always looked forward to stopping in there because we knew we could relax the whole time.

41

jeepcrawler93 Apr 6, 2026 +13

Arifjan was known as the sandbox Disneyland when I deployed to that part of the region years ago. Just comes to show that anything can happen.

13

isthereadrwho Apr 6, 2026 +11

Well it is true that anything can happen, when one decides to attack another country kind of feel like bases in the air region should be one of the things you think about. Like how to prevent the closing the strait of Hormuz. Let's say hypothetically speaking

11

HumanChallet Apr 7, 2026 +2

You make it sound like a random thing. Trump brought this on to distract from Epstein

2

jeepcrawler93 Apr 7, 2026 +2

I'm not disagreeing.

2

TheRealistoftheReal Apr 7, 2026 +1

Camp Doha has the scud goal posts. (03)

1

mewalkyne Apr 6, 2026 +21

Why's that crazy? All bases would be an expected target

21

PizzaDogDad Apr 6, 2026 +33

You're right, but it's still a "crazy" human experience to realize how fragile normalcy and stability really are.

33

Quiet_Down_Please Apr 6, 2026 +7

You're not wrong, but for those of us that have spent any significant time at that base across the multiple decades of its existence, it seemed like the furthest thing from a true war zone (at least in the context of the middle east).

7

Fritzkreig Apr 8, 2026 +1

Have they got rid of Camp Doha?

1

Quiet_Down_Please Apr 8, 2026 +2

It wasn't there when I was like 15 years ago, so I looked it up. Looks like it closed in 2007.

2

Fritzkreig Apr 8, 2026 +2

That was a really nice base, the best I visited in Iraq and Kuwait!

2

fury420 Apr 6, 2026 +3

Indeed but the title claims the spokesperson says they "struck US forces on Bubiyan", whereas the actual text of the article just includes claims that they targeted equipment/munitions on Bubiyan with drones. The title is a claim of success, the article is them claiming an attempt.

3

fury420 Apr 6, 2026 +3

I don't know how fresh this is at all, when I went looking for more info I found basically the same claim by the same Iranian spokesman on March 27/28th.

3

ChroniclesOfSarnia Apr 6, 2026 +98

Iran is taking out all the radar stations first. **IT'S ALMOST AS IF THEY HAVE A STRATEGY.**

98

korinth86 Apr 6, 2026 +36

Its a good strategy generally speaking. It is also what the F-35 was made to combat. A flying sensor and processing platform that can link ground, sea, air capabilities. Still bad news for nations defending against attacks. For US capabilities, so long as AWACs and F-35 can loiter, its not a huge deal.

36

mendenlol Apr 6, 2026 +30

Well we lost 1 of our 16 AF AWACS in the first week or so…. hopefully we don’t keep up the pace there

30

kdmasfck Apr 6, 2026 +63

Yeah hopefully we f*** off and get the hell out of Iran.

63

MagicWishMonkey Apr 6, 2026 +13

Now the administration is concerned about it being hot in the summer. Like no one thought about what would happen if this drags on long enough for weather to become a factor: https://bsky.app/profile/carlquintanilla.bsky.social/post/3mitrvwsfw22b They didn't realize it gets hot. In the middle east. In summer.

13

Koala_eiO Apr 6, 2026 +4

All the scientists seeing that graph must be distraught by the temperatures in abscissa and months in ordinate.

4

TheSleepyTruth Apr 7, 2026 +1

I mean, they have half a dozen massive military bases in the middle east with over 50,000 troops permanently stationed there year-round. I think they know it gets hot and how to manage the heat. Doesn't mean the hot weather isn't a concern though.

1

mendenlol Apr 6, 2026 +11

Would be nice, yeah.

11

riko77can Apr 6, 2026 +15

There are several reports that they also damaged a second.

15

Zapp_Rowsdower_ Apr 6, 2026 +10

Pretty sure we’ve lost two….

10

mendenlol Apr 6, 2026 +2

Oh no. You know, I’d initially typed 2 but I actually hadn’t heard of the second loss yet. Off to depressing news I go….

2

Smooth-Ad5257 Apr 6, 2026 +16

Not a huge deal? Pure technically speaking I guess - feels odd in context of an agression war against a country ...

16

glumjonsnow Apr 7, 2026 +2

yes, it's war. in what context do you think military logistics would matter more?

2

TWFH Apr 6, 2026 +5

You actually think Iran is going to take out enough radars to make a significant difference?

5

ChroniclesOfSarnia Apr 7, 2026 +1

Well, that depends what the targets are. Desalination plants, for example.

1

Little-Stage1948 Apr 6, 2026 -17

Was it to let there entire command be killed and most of their military be decimated before hitting a few things?

-17

Mana_Seeker Apr 6, 2026 +21

Technically, yes, they got to test their decentralization strategy firsthand Is it "good" or sustainable? Who knows, but they assumed in advance that their leadership structures could get taken out I guess we'll find out how long they can endure like this Someone's gonna run out of patience/capacity eventually

21

spiraleyes78 Apr 6, 2026 +15

We have the US State Dept telling us one thing, and Iran *showing* us another. But let's believe the one changing their story from day to day...

15

TheSleepyTruth Apr 6, 2026 +5

Uhh? Both are just making up claims as they go, but the Iranians have been fabricating claims far worse than the US side. US tends to be exaggerating and fabricating regarding progress with negotiations and their geopolitical success (or lack thereof). Whereas Iran is making things up when it comes to actual military strikes. Constantly fabricating having shot down dozens of planes, sunk aircraft carriers, and killed thousands of US soldiers. According to Iran the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier was struck by multiple ballistic missiles and is currently sitting at the bottom of the ocean. Lol. Also they claimed over 500 US servicemen were killed in the opening salvo of the war alone. The actual number was 6. Yes Iran is super reliable and trustworthy, better turn on Press TV and nod your head without questioning what they're telling you. Thats what they're counting on.

5

SawToothKernel Apr 6, 2026 +8

The assassinations don't seem to be working. They are a distributed enemy.

8

LARPerator Apr 6, 2026 +11

Yeah they have definitely built their command structure to be very decentralized. I think there were reports a while ago that the IRGC was doing entirely different things in different regions, as if they weren't even talking. It seems like they instructed and trained their leadership to act with a lot of autonomy. I wouldn't be surprised if they have established goals and priorities from the beginning of the war, and get told "fight to the best of your abilities. You have full authority over everything until you get told to do something. If there's nobody telling you what you do, take the initiative. The decapitation strikes aren't working. The Americans and Israelis hoped that by decimating their command structure they could throw the IRGC into disarray. But the IRGC seems to have found a way to make high level assassinations just a really expensive way of killing one person.

11

DonnieTheYowie Apr 6, 2026 +6

It's almost as if they have a full military doctrine aligned with exactly what you're saying and planned for this... https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/3/10/the-fourth-successor-how-iran-planned-to-fight-a-long-war-with-the-us-and-israel

6

Alieges Apr 7, 2026 +1

We just need to wait for the next Lego rap video from Iran so we can be told what their strategy is.

1

ohdogwhatdone Apr 6, 2026 +724

Just looked up where that is. Well duh, it's like 8km from Iran's coastline lol, what did they expect? Even commercial off the shelf drones could reach them.

724

farnnie123 Apr 6, 2026 +180

Can’t wait for DJI to be what Toyota is to the Middle East. Now the question is which DJI can fit a 50 cal or PKM on its back.

180

thebiggestpoo Apr 6, 2026 +79

Ukraine's been sticking 50 cals on ground drones for a while now. Maybe DJI will break into the ground drone market. I can see the axis gimbal ground blaster and ground blaster mini being a huge success.

79

Undernown Apr 6, 2026 +22

Ukraine also experimented with machineguns on (flying)drones. The recoul makes it too impractical. And the weight needed to stabilize the drone would be much to heavy to be practical.

22

Distantstallion Apr 6, 2026 +14

They should pull an A10 and build the drone around the gun

14

do_u_even_gif_bro Apr 6, 2026 +14

I just watched a video of a drone with a shotgun take out another drone

14

amjhwk Apr 6, 2026 +7

A shotgun is not a machine gun though, and i wonder could it fire multiple rounds or 1 and done

7

dern_the_hermit Apr 6, 2026 +2

> The recoul makes it too impractical. Time to implement recoilless anti-drone rifles then!

2

Traditional-Fly8989 Apr 6, 2026 +1

Bring back gyro jets we have the machining.

1

sroop1 Apr 6, 2026 +20

DJI gear hasn't been used in warfare in a while now.

20

alex_sl92 Apr 6, 2026 +33

Yup. DJI stuff is used for reconnaissance stuff. They use DIY FPV drones that are c****, faster and in some cases immune to signal jamming via fibre optics.

33

throwawayformobile78 Apr 6, 2026 +7

What they using now?

7

martindines Apr 6, 2026 +14

Depends on the purpose. DJI Mavic 3s are still very popular in Ukraine for surveillance and ordnance drops. Homebrew 7” FPVs for suicide runs and scouting

14

Proshop_Charlie Apr 6, 2026 +22

They are basically building them out of make your own drone kits.

22

TurbinePro Apr 6, 2026 +4

just c**** parts from wherever. It just needs to fly fast and go boom, the fiber optic eliminates the need for any communication units.

4

emmer Apr 6, 2026 +1

Roombas

1

crowmagnuman Apr 6, 2026 +1

*Kaboombas*

1

Big-Compote-5483 Apr 6, 2026 +2

Lmao you couldn't be more wrong. DJI does all the heavy lifting for recon and repeaters all across the frontline. And plenty of teams still use them for ordinance drops.

2

rubywpnmaster Apr 6, 2026 +5

I saw an ad on YouTube for a company bragging about autonomous targeting systems for drones and revolutionizing the battlefield. We are one day closer to IRL skynet

5

snksleepy Apr 6, 2026 +7

A swarm of Ukraine's drones racing at you at 400+ km/h would be frightening. Imaging 500 of these dropping down all at once for a c**** $1m

7

CryptoThroway8205 Apr 6, 2026 +1

Someone in Venezuela said AR gun drones swarms were used.

1

derFalscheMichel Apr 6, 2026 +1

Drones can only take single shot weapons and are lost after. Lightweight drone doesn't get along with recoil. Hit or miss. But high caliber shotguns have done wonders in Ukraine

1

P01135809-Trump Apr 6, 2026 +1

DJI Agri T50 can do it, but the T100 will hold more ammo and give you a longer flight time.

1

hupo224 Apr 6, 2026 +12

Almost like the Russian asset is doing this on purpose. Almost.

12

Odd-String29 Apr 6, 2026 +3

Regular artillery can just spam it.

3

Brambletail Apr 6, 2026 +11

EM capabilities make that doubtful. Contrary to what listnook thinks, the c**** drone era ended around 2023. We are now in the "moderately expensive" drone era, where each drone is at least several thousand dollars, more typically in the tens of thousands. Still c**** compared to missiles, but even then drones are only viable when kinetic options like netting and shielding are not being used. The US however, has decided it does not want to learn from Ukraine and seems to be a little haphazard with anti drone activity. It is important to remember though that the viability of drones as a war changing weapon is lately trending in the opposite direction, where effective dirt c**** counter measures like laser weapons, em jamming, netting, etc are rendering all but the fanciest and largest drones only useful for recon and front line combat outside of those defenses.

11

cb_24 Apr 6, 2026 +11

The size and cost has been driven mainly by the expanded application of drones, whether they’re used for strategic purposes (targeting oil refineries or factories hundreds of km away), operational (supply lines/command posts) > 100km away or tactical (attacking assault equipment and manpower) within 100 km, likely much closer. They had much more limited uses in 2023, so they are definitely not trending in the opposite direction, whether it’s for strategic, operational, or tactical purposes. Lasers are definitely not c**** to employ, operate, and maintain. Netting needs to be set up, and if an adversary really wanted they could attack crews who are doing that, there’s plenty of footage of excavators and other construction equipment being targeted by drones. You can’t just throw a net over everything nor can you jam everything. And even if it’s set up it can still be targeted. Ukraine produces hundreds of thousands of drones a year so there are plenty to spare.

11

WanderingTacoShop Apr 6, 2026 +9

Yea I do like to rain on the parade of people with no military experience thinking you are going to sink an aircraft carrier with a swarm of 2lb commercial drones with bombs strapped to them. Munitions are weirdly heavy, the bigger you make your drone the more vulnerable it is to traditional air defense systems. So there is a lot of trade off to be made in lethality vs survivability. One of the biggest reasons tiny FPV drones seemed so scary at the start of the ukraine war was Russian vehicle crews being absurdly undisciplined and driving around with their hatches open near the front. Yea a little drone with a grenade on it can wreck a tank if the crew is dumb enough to let you fly it inside.

9

amjhwk Apr 6, 2026 +1

Drones carry8ng rpgs dont care if the hatch is open or closed

1

cb_24 Apr 6, 2026 +1

FPV drones weren’t used at scale early on. Ukraine had some switchblades that were provided and not much domestic production. It was mostly Bayraktars and javelins that destroyed Russian armored columns. FPV drones have only continued to get more dangerous despite much more awareness of their capabilities and many defenses to try to stop them like camo, welded cages, nets, jammers, etc. The percentage of casualties they account for has only gone up and they’ve largely prevented armor use in many sectors of the front, like Pokrovsk. It’s the main reason Russia switched to using infiltration tactics for the last few years as anything even up-armored gets hit with pervasive recon-strike capabilities on both sides.

1

xxxxxxxsandos Apr 6, 2026 +10

Why the assumption that they’re surprised? Really doubt you’re the only one who figured out a base might get struck.

10

Lepurten Apr 6, 2026 +13

Tbf, the article mentioned they moved camp after getting struck repeatedly, kinda implying that the move was supposed to counter that. Which, granted, may be wrong.

13

chocobowler Apr 6, 2026 +2

What they expected was for Iran to do nothing and declare their boy Donnie the w***** within 12 hours. That didn’t happen obviously.

2

loversama Apr 6, 2026 +2

They fired all the good generals, what should we expect? 😂

2

BrightEdge8171 Apr 6, 2026 +372

Isn't this what people do when they are at war

372

SelfAwareSausage Apr 6, 2026 +255

Yes, but remember that we’re not at war. That’s a liberal talking point, we’re at a “special military operation” according to Dear Leader who would never lie to us!

255

orbital-technician Apr 6, 2026 +51

It really does suck Trump/Netanyahu is doing to Iran what Russia is doing to Ukraine. I don't like that Iran is under religious leadership and the people want something else, but this is not the way. They had protests, lots of people died, but I'm worried this bombing campaign is going to set them back years. Iran needs organic change. We aren't helping. Now they have Khamenei junior.

51

DonnieTheYowie Apr 6, 2026 +15

Confused why you refer to Trump/Netanyahu doing this to Iran, but then go on to refer to Russia (Not Putin) doing the same thing to Ukraine. It's the US / Israel doing this to Iran.

15

loxagos_snake Apr 6, 2026 +5

I called it back when the Russia- Ukraine war started, that many Americans would soon be eating their hats. The arrogant people who were blaming every single Russian for enabling the war and writing cringe speeches about them revolting, would soon be in the same situation. But they don't like this, so now they're distancing themselves. It's not the US, you see, it's Trump/Netanyahu. I know most people on the big Listnook subs are anti-Trump, but it doesn't matter. I'm sure many Russians are also anti-Putin, they just can't say it out loud. It's your turn to revolt now, fellows.

5

Tapatiogawd Apr 6, 2026 +4

Fuckin spot on Donnie. US / Israel are on some real skits shit

4

FuckTitsAssCuntCock Apr 7, 2026 +2

The US is under religious leadership. American politicians are loyal to Israel because of religion.

2

orbital-technician Apr 7, 2026 +1

I agree. It's extremely dumb. Israel isn't even 100 years old. It's like treating anyone named Jesus, as the son of God. Lots of central Americans should be worshipped, lol.

1

Aggressive_Chair1470 Apr 6, 2026 +2

depends which speech though, sometimes it is war.

2

theflintseeker Apr 6, 2026 +2

Indeed, “war” is the new “affordability”

2

yenda1 Apr 6, 2026 +1

didnt dear leader say he won "the war" on day one?

1

takesthebiscuit Apr 6, 2026 +35

It’s not allowed to shoot back at Americans 🙄

35

Any-Calligrapher2866 Apr 6, 2026 +8

Legit saw a bunch of comments on listnook being mad that Iranians wanted to kill American soldiers who were inside Iran.

8

Magjee Apr 6, 2026 +6

Yep The pilot was there flying missions to damage their country

6

LinkedGaming Apr 6, 2026 +15

The Trump Administration entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everybody and nobody was going to bomb them back.

15

geb_bce Apr 6, 2026 +115

I hate that Reuters has a paywall now

115

tyderian Apr 6, 2026 +39

`www.archive.is/`

39

Mana_Seeker Apr 6, 2026 +32

You can try opening it in incognito mode on Brave browser, does the trick for me

32

sobi-one Apr 6, 2026 +27

I’m not judging anyone, but fwiw, not supporting outlets like Reuters will ultimately turn them into an outlet that made you seek out an outlet like Reuters in the first place.

27

AyDylo Apr 6, 2026 +5

No one pays for subscriptions to news. Do you? I understand the purpose of needing funds to do quality journalism, but there are other ways to get funds that don't require a subscription. Edit: look y'all I don't care that much to bother with your replies. Just don't b**** when these outlets start to die due to lack of readers. Don't b**** when the flock continues towards podcasts and streamers.

5

Ganrokh Apr 6, 2026 +9

I pay for a subscription to a local news outlet.

9

NYC_Noguestlist Apr 6, 2026 +5

Like? The literal only other ways are ads (and no one wants to watch those either) or to have a rich owner, which is just corporate interests owning the news.

5

AyDylo Apr 6, 2026 +3

>The literal only other ways are ads (and no one wants to watch those either) Uh, I'd rather watch an ad to have access to the article than not have any access at all... as a free user. It's how I watch YouTube, Twitch, Tubi, etc. This current implementation just gatekeeps news. Now I get to read a headline and find the rest of the story off social media. and watch these news outlets go out of business, because these subscriptions are a bad business model. less viewers. low price from subscriptions won't keep them afloat. etc etc. i can go on. edit: i also want to say, i know political podcasters and streamers that make a nice living from it, and even they dont have any subscriptions to these websites. I know its not a significant point, but it just highlights it

3

jpharber Apr 6, 2026 +3

Yeah… I pay for the NYT and The Economist. Did you know Indonesia is at a crossroads? ^/s

3

sobi-one Apr 6, 2026 +9

No I don’t, and I entirely admit I’m part of the problem. I’m not afraid of being accountable.

9

Shoot_from_the_Quip Apr 6, 2026 +4

Propaganda networks are free. Actual news/reporting has paywalls. All part of a design, and not for the common good.

4

Informal_Process2238 Apr 7, 2026 +1

Reuters partnered with russian state media so I can’t trust them anymore either

1

ClassicHando Apr 6, 2026 +323

Maybe relocating to a place they can reach is bad. Do we have to lose another AWACS before they consider that? I vote for relocating home and out of Israel's dumbass war but im only one guy.

323

TheHumanGnomeProject Apr 6, 2026 +33

Nah, we're two guys 🙋🏽‍♂️

33

Grimjacx Apr 6, 2026 +13

Tres

13

Fe_Mike Apr 6, 2026 +7

Quattro, cinco, cinco, seis

7

jesman1 Apr 6, 2026 +2

You know it's kinda hard just to win a war today. Our subject isn't smart, but he fakes it anyway. He may not have a clue and he may not have style. But everything he lacks, well, he makes up in denial.

2

Awkward_Cheetah_2480 Apr 6, 2026 +52

Then how will they prop up putins war on europe? Daddy needs his money.

52

xxxxxxxsandos Apr 6, 2026 +9

I vote for the second part, but I’m not sure what all this fuss is about. The US is striking Iran daily right? Wouldn’t it make sense for Iran to succeed in striking the US at least periodically lol?

9

HalcyoNighT Apr 6, 2026 +7

Wait, what is the point of relocating to a place the IRGC *cannot* reach? From the other side’s perspective, US forces still need to be able to project force from B back to A.

7

SgtBaxter Apr 6, 2026 +11

B2’s fly from Missouri.

11

Clementine-Wollysock Apr 6, 2026 +5

The US has like 20 something of those, can't really wage a war like that... unless it's against Monaco or the Vatican.

5

Cobra102003 Apr 6, 2026 +2

At which point they take way too long to actually be effective for a high intensity bombing campaign as we have so few of them. This combined with the age and low operational readiness of the b1 fleet has necessitated forward positioning of strategic air power assets.

2

IcyUse33 Apr 6, 2026 +8

They're getting a little help from their friends.

8

oneonus Apr 6, 2026 +58

Relocate back to US already.

58

Birdius Apr 6, 2026 +25

Article says they were targeted, not that they actually hit anything. You could also take from this that the drones were simply taken out of the sky, but the Iranian spokesperson isn't going to say that. Since they can pretty much say anything they want as there is no way to verify it, the article is essentially meaningless.

25

CaptainRAVE2 Apr 6, 2026 +33

I thought we had won weeks ago?

33

Bradski89 Apr 6, 2026 +151

Mar 3: "We won the war." Mar 7: "We defeated Iran." Mar 9: "We must attack Iran." Mar 9: "The war is ending almost completely, and very beautifully." Mar 11: “You never like to say too ⁠early you won. We won. In the first hour it was over.” Mar 12: "We did win, but we haven't won completely yet." Mar 13: "We won the war." Mar 14: "Please help us." Mar 15: "If you don't help us, I will certainly remember it." Mar 16: "Actually, we don't need any help at all." Mar 16: "I was just testing to see who's listening to me." Mar 16: "If NATO doesn't help, they will suffer something very bad." Mar 17: "We neither need nor want NATO's help." Mar 17: "I don't need Congressional approval to withdraw from NATO." Mar 18: "Our allies must cooperate in reopening the Strait of Hormuz." Mar 19: "US allies need to get a grip - step up and help open the Strait of Hormuz." Mar 20: "NATO are cowards." Mar 21: "The Strait of Hormuz must be protected by the countries that use it. We don't use it, we don't need to open it." Mar 22: "This is the last time. I will give Iran 48 hours. Open the strait" Mar 22: "Iran is Dead" Mar 23: "We had very good and productive talks with Iran." Mar 24: "We’re making progress." Mar 24: "[Iran] gave us a present and the ⁠present arrived today, and it was a very big present, worth a tremendous amount of money." Mar 25: “They gave us a present and the present arrived today. And it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize.” Mar 26: "Make a deal, or we’ll just keep blowing them away." Mar 27: "We don’t have to be there for NATO." Mar 28: No major quote Mar 29: Claimed talks were progressing Mar 30: "Open the Strait of Hormuz immediately, or face devastating consequences." Mar 31: Claimed a deal was "very close" and that Iran would "do the right thing" Apr 1: "We’ll see what happens very soon." Apr 2: Repeated that a deal was likely, while warning of continued strikes if not Apr 3: "Something big is going to happen." Apr 4: Said Iran must comply "immediately" or face further consequences. Apr 5: "Open the fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah." I stole this post fair and square from u/BaconManDan9

151

BaconManDan9 Apr 6, 2026 +42

Share this everywhere my friend!

42

Jase_the_Muss Apr 6, 2026 +11

Jesus it's already been a month of this pointless shit.

11

Atlas-Sphere Apr 6, 2026 +3

Missing both ultimatum taco.

3

flat5 Apr 6, 2026 +5

Winning is easy. We've done it at least 10 times.

5

Red_Dox Apr 6, 2026 +3

He ended 10 more wars? We really should give him a Peace prize. /s

3

teebird_phreak Apr 6, 2026 +30

Are we done winning yet?

30

CaptainRAVE2 Apr 6, 2026 +19

We won weeks ago. At least that’s what I was told…

19

YogiBarelyThere Apr 6, 2026 +63

I've noticed the IRGC bots are getting enthusiastic with awarding posts that they like. Edit: 5 more Happy Heart awards since my post 4 hours ago. lol

63

forumrunner Apr 6, 2026 +74

I don't think you have to be a bot to support the US getting a bloody nose in this war. I'd hazard a guess that at least in Europe most people aren't on the side of the US in this conflict, even if they aren't exactly cheering on the IRGC either.

74

Icy_Age8191 Apr 7, 2026 +3

They're all over the comments. Listnook has a serious propaganda problem. It gets upvoted because idiots want the US to be losing more than they actually are. Absolutely zero critical thinking, just taking Iranian spokesman statements at face value because of confirmation bias.

3

Business_Bunch_8196 Apr 6, 2026 +9

Yeah it’s concerning seeing posts like these getting the heart award while others like the US pilots being rescued have the broken hearted award

9

ghaj56 Apr 6, 2026 +6

Undoubtedly Iran is being trained by the best listnook shitposters, or Russia is just running digital for them entirely on their behalf, or both

6

emmer Apr 6, 2026 +6

It will never not be funny seeing people root for Iran because they hate the U.S. for not being progressive enough

6

seanseansean92 Apr 6, 2026 +24

Imagine them brave soldiers had to die for trump. To him its just a job and a joke. But blood shed is real

24

Gh0stPeppers Apr 6, 2026 +21

This is all one side of information from Iran, I’d wait and see what US armed forces says. Trump may lie his ass off but the US military brass has been pretty open and honest

21

One-Recording8588 Apr 6, 2026 +27

And it got a bunch of them fired by dear leader.

27

JConRed Apr 6, 2026 +14

A lot of the brass was removed for having a spine.

14

jrinredcar Apr 6, 2026 +1

Any of them come out and give details? Or would they sign NDAs? No idea how it would work

1

Winterough Apr 6, 2026 +2

It must feel awful to sacrifice everything in service to the country to be ultimately fired by some bozo.

2

Successful-Cup1765 Apr 6, 2026 +2

Didn’t they kick out any press that doesn’t report the war in a favorable way?

2

Friendly_Trouble_916 Apr 6, 2026 +3

This is all on trump’s

3

S1gorJabjong Apr 6, 2026 +8

Heheh. Peace talks.

8

Jaythamalo13 Apr 6, 2026 +5

I read this was a drone strike. How long until we start seeing Ukraine-style drone vids of American troops being killed? Crazy times man..

5

Hot-Delay5608 Apr 6, 2026 +2

From Russia with love, not that the orange pedo cares about any of the service members to do anything about it

2

Sans-valeur Apr 6, 2026 +2

Damn it looks like nobody told Iran that they lost the war already. Maybe it’s because of the internet black out? Or maybe they just don’t follow him on truth social? Damn that’s crazy who could have seen this coming?

2

International_Ad5624 Apr 6, 2026 +1

Well damn, hope there were no casualties

1

[deleted] Apr 6, 2026 +1

[removed]

1

UnTides Apr 6, 2026 +1

US Military hasn't released a casualty report in ages. Hmmmmmmmmmm

1

Iran struck US forces relocated on Kuwait's Bubiyan island, military spokesperson says

💬 Send a Message

146 Comments