· 157 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 15, 2026 at 1:09 PM

Iran threatens to block Red Sea if US naval blockade persists

Posted by jiisow


TRT World - Iran threatens to block Red Sea if US naval blockade persists
www.trtworld.com
TRT World - Iran threatens to block Red Sea if US naval blockade persists
The US announced the blockade after weekend peace talks in Islamabad with Iran failed to reach a deal.

🚩 Report this post

157 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Hellosweetparadox 4 days ago +1272
This is starting to be a game of battleship
1272
deviantbono 4 days ago +12
The battleship game doesn't have blockades?
12
lordunholy 4 days ago +2
Newer versions have all sorts of neat mechanics.
2
jjax2003 4 days ago +264
How if Iran has no navy anymore. It's all been obliterated ;)
264
LangyMD 4 days ago +297
Ukraine also has no navy, yet they have denied the Black Sea to Russia's navy.
297
XimbalaHu3 4 days ago +79
Comparing the U.S. navy to the russian navy is wild, but so is this reality, so whatever I giess.
79
ghotier 4 days ago +100
It's not the same goal. Iran isn't trying to keep the US out of "their" territory by force (because they can't). They are blocking access to civilian vessels, which are also weaker than the Russian Navy.
100
BasicMatter7339 3 days ago +14
They dont even need to actually block anything either. They only need one sea drone to strike a cargoship and the risk of more potential strikes makes insurance companies refuse to insure any ship going through the red sea. So no ship will go through it.
14
Roobsi 4 days ago +90
if you think about this for more than about half a second you'd see that the wider point is that drones act as a massive force multiplier and can allow a country without many boats to still expose ships to risk.
90
catsbetterthankids 3 days ago +10
Doesn’t take much to make insurance prohibitively expensive for commercial traffic.
10
hamilkwarg 3 days ago +7
They are talking about blocking commercial vessels from the strait. Not comparing US and Russian navy. They are saying if Ukraine without a navy can block Russian navy from the much larger Black Sea, it is feasible that Iran without a navy can block commercial vessels from the narrow Strait of Hormuz using similar tactics.
7
Routine_Bit_8184 4 days ago +23
if anybody could figure out how to look like a b**** with the world's most powerful navy...it is definitely trump and company.
23
BlazinAzn38 4 days ago +17
A couple anti-ship missiles get through though and that’s enough
17
Opening_Dog_570 4 days ago +9
I don't think you can compare Ukraine with Iran and Russia with Usa. But then again on this listnook, ppl write all sorts of baseless c***
9
Nextasy 4 days ago +36
I don't think he was saying Ukraine = Iran and Russia = USA, he was saying there's an ongoing demonstration of using missiles and drones from a shoreline to prevent use of nearby waters, without the need for a navy. This is reality, regardless of how one feels about US/Israel's statements about how much of Iran's military is left, and regardless of Iran's threats to shipping. It's not an impossibility and needs to be considered.
36
k4kobe 3 days ago +9
I think a lot of people are having trouble understanding it accepting that this will become Vietnam but on sea and done via drones
9
LangyMD 4 days ago +44
It's not about comparing the USA with Russia. It's about a revolution in warfare that was put on worldwide display during the Ukraine war - drones, both air and sea. Sea and dairy drones can make vast swathes of ocean near a country's coast too dangerous to operate above the waves in safely no matter if you have a navy or not.
44
RoundishWaterfall 4 days ago +24
Mm dairy drones
24
joelfarris 4 days ago +9
Guess all the milkman routes are gonna go out of business now.
9
squeeze-my-lizard 4 days ago +48
“Dear Listnook, today I read something I didn’t like. Why do you do this to me?”
48
Catch_022 3 days ago +38
Here's the fun fact - Iran knew that their navy would be annihilated, which is why they didn't really invest much in big boats. Instead they have thousands of small boats, drones and mines. These aren't a threat to the US Navy until/unless they try to force the strait.
38
flyingdorito2000 3 days ago +4
how are they gonna blockade with little boats
4
Sky_HUN 3 days ago +4
You don't need to physically blockade it, just strike a commercial vessel and insurance will skyrocket first then after the 2nd strike, no insurance company will insure any ship that goes there, without insurance, no shipping.
4
Primary-Debate-549 3 days ago +4
> thousands of small boats, drones and mines I don't think you fully realize how expensive the mullah's mansions are. Dozens of small boats.
4
TheSleepyTruth 4 days ago +25
They wont be using a navy, they dont have a navy left. They will be using their Houthi rebel allies on the coast of Yemen to attack ships from land at the narrow Red Sea choke point similar to what they are doing on the Strait of Hormuz.
25
otclogic 3 days ago +10
Gosh, its almost as if allowing festering terrorists at vulnerable trade bottlenecks is a bad idea. that is a dig at everyone involved and uninvolved.
10
to_glory_we_steer 4 days ago +16
They have a proxy militia called The Houthis in this place called Yemen... Guess where it's located?
16
Silverleaf_86 4 days ago +20
Good, I would like to see the Houthis act upon Iranian orders. [Iran denies ordering Houthi attacks, as Yemen group reports wave of US airstrikes](https://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-denies-ordering-houthi-attacks-as-yemen-group-reports-wave-of-us-airstrikes/amp/) [Iran denies helping Houthis plan attacks on Israel-linked ships](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-denies-helping-houthis-plan-attacks-israel-linked-ships-2023-12-23/) [Iran denies Houthi attack links, awaits next US meeting - report](https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-852715)
20
Shot-Toe-2884 4 days ago +20
lol yep. Iran is suddenly self confessing to so much of their bullshit over the last 30 years. They used to be wise enough to ask their proxies to close down international shipping lanes. Now they just do it themselves. They used to be wise enough to pretend they weren’t connected to their proxies. Now they are publicly dragging their proxies to war at their command and bragging about the leverage it provides them. For as disastrous as Trump’s decision making has been in this war, Iran’s decision making has been unbelievably self destructive. They’re high as f*** on their own propaganda. I guess Khamenei Sr didn’t tell his son that this was all a delicate act, not official policy.
20
SeaworthinessSome454 3 days ago +6
His son isn’t making any decisions. These r all happening on the lower levels. Blockading the Red Sea is propaganda from their media people (who honestly are doing wonderful at their job).
6
Bleatmop 3 days ago +5
The amount of westerners that are full on accepting Iranian propaganda is both discouraging and completely unsurprising. Like we knew all you had to do is say something in a confident manner and there are people that will agree because of that due to Russian disinformation but I never thought a catchy lego music video would be as successful as it is.
5
SeeingEyeDug 4 days ago +2
B7. You blockaded my battleship!
2
senza_titolo 4 days ago +1
Ya, I’m waiting for one of those giant robots from Pacific Rim to show up next.
1
omjy18 3 days ago +1
So when do the jumping alien ships and the decommissioned battleships come into play or are we rewriting this all over again?
1
BabyBearBjorns 3 days ago +1
Where is Rihanna when you need her!?
1
Ironsam811 3 days ago +1
I genuinely thought we blew up every ship no joke
1
pixeltackle 4 days ago +415
Yeah I'm gonna blockade your blockade if you don't unblock the block.
415
June_The_Jedi 4 days ago +64
Well I’ll just blockade your blockade of my blockade if you do that.
64
CommunicationNeat498 4 days ago +24
You think i won't blockade your blockade with which you're blockading the blockade i'm blockading your blockade with? Think again!
24
sirhackenslash 3 days ago +7
You, dang, I heard you like blockades
7
kebiclanwhsk 4 days ago +13
You can’t triple stamp a double stamp! No erasies!
13
Caffdy 3 days ago +6
[some Jojo vibes going on](https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/036/819/ouscover.jpg)
6
ineyeseekay 3 days ago +2
Dawg, I heard you like blockades
2
Heffe3737 3 days ago +2
There's only really like 20 major maritime chokepoints on the planet. So thankfully this game of oneupmanship can't run on forever!
2
pixeltackle 3 days ago +2
Of the 8 big ones, 2 are currently blocked, right?
2
Heffe3737 3 days ago +6
Only the one with the Strait of Hormuz, with a risk now on the second if the Houthis get the order to block off Bab el-Mandeb. I anyone is interested in reading more, here's a good short primer. People really underestimate the importance of these shipping routes when it comes to modern geopolitical strategy. As we're all now getting overly acquainted with... [https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapping-the-worlds-key-maritime-choke-points/](https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapping-the-worlds-key-maritime-choke-points/)
6
Shot-Toe-2884 4 days ago
The IRGC blocked the strait of Hormuz at Khamenei's orders. No other order on this has been given to Iranian soldiers. Iran is threatening to block another strait after they blocked the first one all by themselves. *“Furthermore, the leverage of closing the Strait of Hormuz must definitely continue to be utilised." - Motjaba Khamenei*
0
DateMasamusubi 4 days ago +186
Saudis would get involved per their East - West Pipeline. Expect Yemen to get hotter.
186
foghillgal 4 days ago +68
And then desalination gets hit and its game over. That\`s why they stay out. Those infrastructure are very very vulnerable.
68
otclogic 3 days ago +39
You know who else has desalination plants and is current in a severe drought? *Iran* What do you think happens when 90 million people don’t have water. And as vulnerable as Saudi Arabia’s desalination plants may be Iran can’t hit them at will, they just don’t have the reliable hardware and missile defenses are still viable. The US and Israel are able to strike anywhere they want. So if Iran pulls that lever, their own people will be going thirsty before the Saudi’s.
39
Diezelbub 3 days ago +18
Yup. The reason Iran hasnt hit anyone else's water plants is because they are 100% fucked when whoever and their allies then turn around and do the same thing to them. They may be crazy enough to flood the straight with oil but that wont lead to regime collapse like no water will. When the only way that gets fixed any time soon is a complete regime change along with the international aid and completely lifted sanctions that come with it, that is what will happen. They may be crazy but they're not stupid.
18
Nolenag 3 days ago +14
Israel/US has already bombed desalination plants in Iran. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Qeshm_Island_desalination_plant_attack
14
ApprehensiveBaker480 3 days ago +13
Iran is way, way less dependent on desalination plants than the gulf countries. This is disingenuous
13
otclogic 3 days ago +11
Certainly, but the strikes on power plants would be the main way the US would retaliate and that would cripple their water distribution in urban areas.
11
Captain_Wag 3 days ago +3
Less dependent for sure, but they already have a water crisis going on. If they lose more water it wouldn't be great.
3
Purple_oyster 3 days ago +2
3% of Iran water supplies comes from desalination plants
2
otclogic 3 days ago +2
Doesn’t matter too much because the retaliatory strikes would be on power plants which would impede flow regardless of sourcing. Theoretically this could be used to target water distribution in specific areas. The main impetus of my comment is that Iran can unreliably strike some things eventually, but the US can reliably strike almost anything immediately, so if Iran starts pointing the gun at purely civilian infrastructure there’s an awful lot of ‘dual use’ rungs on the escalation ladder that the US can climb.
2
Codex_Dev 4 days ago +14
Iran bout to go to war with all the other Arab countries 😂
14
choppytehbear1337 4 days ago +50
Iran is not Arab.
50
Mr06506 3 days ago +11
Saudi are a paper tiger. Best they could do is throw money at some private security or third country to do their work for them.
11
AlexandbroTheGreat 3 days ago +2
They can destroy some desalination plants that have to be on the coast. Nobody could screw that up.
2
jmacintosh250 3 days ago +5
Eh they did f*** up someone recently in Yemen a bit. Especially if the US backs them and are willing to commit to a ground game, they can do well.
5
Atralis 3 days ago +2
This is why I don't think the Houthis will do it. During the Gaza war they closed the their strait but the strait of Hormuz stayed open the US bombed the shit out of the Houthis without the Iranians really doing anything to stop it. Now Iran is telling them to go to war and they know there is a real possibility that the Saudis will launch a full scale invasion backed by US ground troops if they do that and the Iranians will not really be able to help them at all in real material terms any more than they an help Hezbollah against Iran right now.
2
AMCorBUST2021 4 days ago +106
Who wins a blockade? The one that can tolerate more economic pain and lasts.
106
Colbert2020 4 days ago +175
I remember that 6 months into the war with Ukraine, everyone was declaring that Russia's economy was on the verge of collapse. It's been FOUR F****** YEARS since then.
175
itsFelbourne 4 days ago +126
Russia went in with a relatively healthy economy, spent most of the war with industries running uninterrupted and undamaged, sold oil to China the entire time, and had massive cash reserves that they dumped for years to stabilize their currency. Iran went into this war already in the middle of a currency collapse and a water crisis, had minuscule reserves compared to Russia, and has had several industrial sectors like steel and aluminum production totally destroyed. Now they cannot export by sea which cuts their main source of income We have nowhere near enough data to say if Iran is actually “close” to collapse, but they are much *closer than Russia* by any conceivable metric, and the comparison doesn’t make much sense
126
Colbert2020 4 days ago +43
I'm just saying I am way more skeptical about these economic predictions.
43
BrainBlowX 3 days ago +21
The economic predictions were correct on the surface. Russia's economy has been entirely propped up by injecting itself with cash reserves. The actual *civilian economy* HAS practically collapsed already, but the impact is distributed unevenly and staggered. It's the "hitler fixed the german economy" of the 21st century. No, he just injected society with debt, same as russia now does forcing the russian banks to "give loans" they have no hope to pay since nobody else will lend money to russia.
21
WorstCPANA 3 days ago +8
What do you mean the civilian economy has 'practically collapsed already' - is the average person hungry? Can they not get basic living needs met? Is there any unrest due to this?
8
MercantileReptile 4 days ago +17
And Iran does not need to outlast the US. They just need to tolerate conditions longer than *the rest of the Planet* is willing to wait for this fuckwittery to finally end. As prices go through the roof. Or supply is endangered outright, in some places. Some people seem to think this is like a medieval siege, with Iran being the Castle.
17
Primary-Debate-549 3 days ago +5
Hormuz blocks 20% of the worlds' oil (not even with both diversion pipelines active, now effectively more like 10%). Not 100%. The vast majority of the world can deal with the issue just fine.
5
changrami 3 days ago +5
What? The Strait of Hormuz isn't just oil dude. 20% of oil, 20% of LNG is already a staggeringly large amount, have you not seen gas prices? Economies have collapsed for less. The strait is also the corridor where the Saudis import food and neccesities, which they need since they live in a desert. Desalination aside, the countries along the strait are going to go balistic when they can't get medicine. Also, fertillizers used across the developing world rely heavily on ammonia and urea that is exported through that strait. Countries like Brazil are already ringing the bell on their agriculture industry; farming is a very tight-margin profession, and price hikes this high will drive many farmers out of a job. Even if you don't drive, grocery prices will rise from their already ludicrous price. Also, oil comes in many different colors. Jet fuel is an obvious example; it has risen about 140% in six weeks. Why? Because tons of refineries are placed on the Persian Gulf to make jet fuel. The strait closing is a death sentence to a lot of airlines working on tight margins. The price isn't the only issue; a time will come where you can't get jet fuel no matter how much you want to pay. I could go on about how the 3 East-Asian economies of China, South Korea and Japan, who have little natural oil production are heavily reliant on oil. Japan especially is concerning; their reserves are not large enough to power through a prolonged conflict. But please, don't claim the vast majority of countries will be fine. This conflict will raise proces everywhere, and a lot of people and countries down on the food chain will be drowned and left behind.
5
sneakysssnek 4 days ago +2
I seem to recall many castles falling.
2
dcasarinc 4 days ago +6
The one who can make it till mid term elections. Unfortunately, Iran does not have elections. So probably they just need to wait the US a few months.
6
porto__rocks 3 days ago +6
Iran has been in economic pain for decades. I dont think the yanks could take a full year
6
Ultra_Metal 4 days ago +17
Which would be the US, since it has by far the largest economy in the world and this war is barely affecting the US economically. Meanwhile, the Islamic Republic lost most of its income because of the blockade, and this is while it was already under a massive economic crisis that started months ago.
17
lucitatecapacita 4 days ago +20
Don't know - US is a democracy, and we have elections in November, there doesn't seem to be an appetite, among the general public, for war
20
Possibly_Naked_Now 3 days ago +7
I think America's appetite for war is dependent on how it affects gas prices domestically. And if we end up with boots on the ground or not. So far gas prices have leveled out to inconvenience levels but not enough to make people angry. And we haven't had any US troops involved in ground operations. Realistically, if the blockade can prevent the Iranian regime from paying their military. We genuinely could see an internal revolution in Iran. No army on the planet will work for free. But if gas prices start skyrocketing, Trump might just get dragged out of the white house by an angry mob. "It's the economy, stupid!".
7
Ultra_Metal 3 days ago +2
It doesn't matter. Trump can't run for reelection and the party in power nearly always loses the midterms, regardless of how they perform.
2
BrainBlowX 3 days ago +12
By this logic the US would win the Vietnam war. Claiming the war "barely affects the US" is ludicrous. Prices are already way up, and even if the war ended *today* this would just be the start of the consequences as the domino effects start to set in over time. This is already the most unpopular war in American history. The "pain tolerance" of the American public regarding this war is *thin.*
12
A-o-C 4 days ago +27
Eh America is politically speaking more sensitive to economic pain than Iran is. Ironically this war may have entrenched Iran's regime more than before the war. At least in the short to medium term.
27
Ultra_Metal 4 days ago +10
No, Iran's regime is not more entrenched. It is weaker than it has ever been. It is on the verge of collapse.
10
xsupremeleader 4 days ago +9
I would say that Iran's government seems to be both be more entrenched in their goals but are overall weaker in their ability achieve said goals
9
Ultra_Metal 4 days ago +17
It doesn't matter how entrenched in their goals they are if they can't do anything about it or even survive. I'm sure the Black Knight from Monty Python was super entrenched in his goal of getting revenge against King Arthur, but he didn't have the ability after having lost all his limbs.
17
DirkTheGamer 4 days ago +6
Haha great analogy
6
Playful_Rip_1280 4 days ago +4
Nah, when the IRGC stops getting paid and the economy goes to shit I think you’ll see a lot change real fast. America’s economy on the other hand is running extremely hot. The media just paints a much bleaker picture than reality.
4
thereoncewasahat 4 days ago +5
The difference is the Islamic regime now has an iron grip over it's populace. Doesn't matter if they die, they don't care; if they rise again (they won't, the heros are dead) they'll just shoot them. In America the tolerance for discomort is much lower, that discomfort is only going to increase greatly over time; and the populace has a much greater influence over the government. The American populace also knows that this is a war of choice which was against it's interests, which were sacrificed for Israel; that's going to markedly drive down tolerance.
5
Cream_Stay_Frothy 4 days ago +2
Uh… are we just going to ignore China’s economy in this? Yes, it’s not as large as the US, economically speaking, but I’d argue their economic relevance to other countries, including the US, are more impactful. Plus, like Iran, the Chinese government is far less susceptible to the domestic popular opinion than are the politicians in the US.
2
Ultra_Metal 4 days ago +2
What China thinks doesn't matter. The Islamic Republic will collapse very quickly due to this blockade. China can't save them.
2
Cream_Stay_Frothy 4 days ago +6
China, as well as most nations, are “a part” of this was in the sense that it absolutely has massive repercussions on their supply chain, economy, and domestic stability. A not insignificant supply of their oil has been cut off, enough to cause serious economic detriment. They, along with much of Asia, are being particularly impacted by this war. In terms of being able to destabilize the US Economy, China BY FAR has the best capacity to do so, mainly through economic/trade policy. For example, Halting US protein imports, halt targeted exports (that most impact US Citizens to cause domestic uproar), while selling off tranches of US Treasury bonds (of which they have about ~$700 BILLION USD) which helps their currency from the inflationary pressure of diminished trade. This would have a crippling effect on the US stock market and USD stability (to an already hyper inflated “AI” driven market). Let’s be real, even prior to the war, Trumps tariff policy, coupled with his general unstable behavior had nations across the globe working to establish new international trade partners that would reduce the dependence on the US. To think that China doesn’t have a plan for alternate food importers (Australia or Brazil come to mind) in exchange for opening up alternative export markets is being naive. Hell, if Canada and the EU decided it was in their best interest, Canada is a massive oil exporter (currently, to the US), and it’s not like this US administration has been a good ally in any meaningful capacity to Canada, the EU, anyone other than Israel really… All it takes is a handful of nations to get together and say, “You know what, f*** this guy” and *boom*, the damage is done. Trump and his administration has been abysmal for US relations, and since campaigning, run on an isolationist policy… For what it’s worth, they’ve been putting on a masterclass in how to do that
6
LiveToLoveAndLearn 3 days ago +1
Trump came in to have a blockade to China. He does not care and just play a role of defending the world against Iran when he came for just that.
1
OB1KENOB 4 days ago +43
Go ahead. Israel will simply send a guy with a stick to part the sea in half.
43
panlouis 4 days ago +12
Isn't Iran also blocking the strait? Are they trying to open it now? 
12
ion-deez-nuts 3 days ago +7
Iran is blocking the Strait of Hormuz to US ships and to ships that don't pay their toll. Iran is not blocking anyone else. Whereas the US recently started a blockade of Iran, stopping any ship going to or from an Iranian port. (Though this may have recently changed as apparently they're allowing Chinese ships to go to and from Iranian ports)
7
itsFelbourne 4 days ago +39
Houthis really don’t seem like they want that smoke. They’re probably in too precarious of a situation themselves to have their own shipping affected in response
39
Shot-Toe-2884 4 days ago +68
Hezbollah was in the same predicament, but they caved to pressure, and now Lebanon and Israel are openly negotiating without them about disarming Hezbollah and honoring UN resolution 1901, while Israel continues routing Hezbollah strongholds in Beirut. Iran is pushing their proxies into committing suicide just to save itself. Iran has never been weaker, and they may not be able to take the Houthis allegiance for granted anymore. The world is going to lose its patience with the Houthis faster than with Hezbollah. They've already held the global economy hostage once, and now they are threatening to do it again. Whatever you think of the US role in all of this, nobody is forcing Iran to do this shit. These are not counterattacks against the United States, they are unprovoked terror attacks on the global economy.
68
Artistic_Concern_33 4 days ago +19
Yeah they don’t want to be involved, they are under intense pressure from Iran, they had to fire 3 ballistic missiles to Israel which barely had any warhead and was intercepted and 1 was short and dropped in the ocean, the fact Israel and the US didn’t respond to it shows they know the houthis are under pressure, I mean the Houthis see how hezbolah is being decimated and don’t want it to be them
19
Ihavenoideatall 4 days ago +3
Battleship game?
3
GuaSukaStarfruit 3 days ago +2
Except one side has no battleship left
2
Street_Anon 4 days ago +6
Ok, Iran really wants a regional war, go ahead
6
apathetic_revolution 3 days ago +8
>In a statement carried by Iranian state television on Wednesday, the head of Iran's military central command centre said if the US continues with its blockade and "creates insecurity for Iran's commercial vessels and oil tankers", it will constitute "a prelude" to violating the ceasefire. >"The powerful armed forces of the republic will not allow any exports or imports to continue in the Gulf, the Sea of Oman, and the Red Sea," said Ali Abdollahi. I have my doubts that Iran can project the naval power that they claim to be able to on Iranian state TV.
8
_HIST 3 days ago +7
I'm f****** confused how it their minds they can do anything in the red sea lmao
7
Secret-Sundae-1847 3 days ago +4
The Houthis will start attacking ships
4
ezagreb 4 days ago +3
I’m sure it would be based on their allies attacking ships but it seems mostly an empty threat
3
yosisoy 3 days ago +3
I'm gonna block your driveway bro
3
Zib559 3 days ago +3
They would if they could...
3
pumpkinspicecum 3 days ago +3
this is the dumbest war
3
Mountainminer 3 days ago +6
If they blockade Red Sea won’t the USA just crush their navy?
6
wwaxwork 4 days ago +10
Trying to out crazy crazy a crazy person, an interesting tactic. I'm going bet it ends with Trump trying to stop all ships everywhere all around the world.
10
bakkarj 4 days ago +9
Do it or put the cardboard cutout of dear leader back in storage.
9
btb0002 4 days ago +55
Iran has zero leverage. This will only end badly for them. Their leadership is delusional
55
Colbert2020 4 days ago +40
People seem ass-pained at the fact that this stupid administration actually did a pretty good strategic response to Iran "closing the strait." Even if you hate the USA, surely they also hate Iran. Why even root for either party. It baffles belief to me.
40
GuaSukaStarfruit 3 days ago +6
I hate dictators, I root for US taking down Iranian regime.
6
NlghtmanCometh 3 days ago +3
If anything it’s a mark against them that they didn’t start by using this strategy. Maybe they don’t have the means to keep the straight open, but if anyone can lock that straight down it’s the USN. I think they were worried about provoking China, so they were letting Chinese-marked crude through (which is where most of Irans oil goes) but since China has been giving Iran material and intelligence support *anyway*, they’re saying f*** it. Close her down.
3
Colbert2020 3 days ago +3
I think there was a change in leadership for who is managing this mess. It seemed like they had no response to Iran closing the strait and Trump just flailed around, whining to NATO and threatening to nuke Iran. And also, inexplicably, allowing Iran... the ENEMY in this WAR... to sail on by, selling their oil, and generating wealth. WHAT!?! WHO MADE THAT DECISION?? Then some dude, a month later was like: "Bro... we have a navy... they don't..."
3
NlghtmanCometh 3 days ago +2
It really is probably as stupid as that. Hegseth isn’t exactly sun tzu.
2
shaehl 4 days ago +6
"Iran is closing the straight to cause pain to our economy and alliances.... In that case we'll double close it!" Big brain strat right there. Yes it hurts Iran, as they can't let some ships through to sell their oil, but it also doubles the economic damage to the rest of the world, while getting to put more blame on the US in the eyes of global leaders. In the end, even if we get a ceasefire or a peace deal, what did this arbitrarily started war accomplish? Oil prices higher, Iran likely to be charging tolls going forward, a bunch of dead school girls, Billions of US dollars wasted on bombs and planes, and the rest of the world looking at us like a clown putting a stick in the spokes of our own bicycle.
6
JanitorOfSanDiego 3 days ago +10
Isn’t the US blockade only on ships dealing with Iran directly? It’s not fully closing the strait.
10
Diezelbub 3 days ago +5
Yes but this is far too complicated a concept for social media, they saw a tweet and thats the only understanding they're sticking with because its short enough to digest. As all social media denizens know, everything they read on a social media platform is a verbatim, literal fact, especially when it has a half paragraph character limit.
5
Colbert2020 4 days ago +18
Iran selling their oil or not won't the price of crude oil from 90 dollars a barrel to 60. Sorry. My guesses: 1. You don't know how many ships transit the strait in "normal" times. 2. You don't know the peak amount of ships transiting it during the war. 3. You don't know how many ships dock at Iran during times (1) and (2). 4. You aren't keeping track of the crude oil to USD price as they related to these events. If you did, you wouldn't say: "it hurts Iran, as they can't let some ships through to sell their oil, but it also doubles the economic damage to the rest of the world." If you want to be taken seriously, you need to learn how this war is going through facts. Not rhetoric, vibes, or scrolling on Listnook and being angry at headlines.
18
CJKay93 3 days ago +3
People are growing sympathetic to one belligerent because the other belligerent has spent the past month punching us all in the economy while actively lambasting us for not helping them with it. It's strange to me that you *wouldn't* expect people to be sympathetic - it was the USA that ripped up the very agreement that actually ensured their biggest demand, and it was the USA that blew up half the country unprovoked *twice* with no consideration at all for the impact on anybody else. People are sympathetic because "America First" is just another way of saying "f*** all of you", and - as shit as the Iranian regime may be - *they* didn't decide on a whim that we don't deserve fuel for our homes and fertiliser for our fields.
3
[deleted] 3 days ago +1
[removed]
1
blastmemer 4 days ago +6
Welcome to Listnook!
6
Hackwork89 4 days ago +3
This guy pretending to know
3
Miyagisans 4 days ago +2
Unlike the US of course
2
blastmemer 4 days ago +36
The US has delusional leadership with a lot of leverage.
36
To_Fight_The_Night 3 days ago +2
The leverage the US has is that it does not need middle east oil. It hurts the global price but that's not the same thing as actual physical supply. The USA wins the battle of attrition here easily.
2
btribble 3 days ago +1
You think religious extremists are delusional? Do you think delusional religious extremists respond logically to external pressure? Do you think they give up easily? Name a group of delusional religious extremists that changed their minds for logical reasons.
1
dMestra 4 days ago +4
Blockade with what navy lol
4
Joebranflakes 4 days ago +4
With what?
4
yzeerf1313 4 days ago +4
It's blockades all the way down
4
virtual_adam 4 days ago +15
They threatened to bomb other ports the minute the blockade started The official quote was > no port in the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea will be safe And then they didn’t. Iran better start actually doing and not just talking if they want to be taken seriously. They themselves announced the US has broken the ceasefire as well as Israel, but they seemed to have turned off all attack mechanisms since It Iran is going to keep respecting the ceasefire during the blockade and carpet bombing of Lebanon, well they won’t really be taken seriously as they were a month ago when they were shooting first and announcing later
15
Zieprus_ 4 days ago +18
I think they are stalling for time so they can fix or unbury a lot of things. Iran still has a shit tone of missiles and capability that might be a bit buried at the moment.
18
Ultra_Metal 4 days ago +10
The Islamic Republic is a paper tiger. The paper tiger crumbles when people stop being afraid of its empty threats.
10
ihatethesidebar 4 days ago +5
How?
5
Bakedfresh420 4 days ago +2
I feel like they said this last week
2
DemoEvolved 3 days ago +2
Inb4 Trump threatens to block the Atlantic if Iran blocks the Red Sea
2
Shot-Toe-2884 4 days ago +19
Iran proudly closed the strait of Hormuz with piracy and terrorism. They mined international waters, and then they bragged about it endlessly with childish lego animations. Iran's supreme leader has insisted that the strait will remain closed by his authority alone and nobody elses. *“Furthermore, the leverage of closing the Strait of Hormuz must definitely continue to be utilised." - Motjaba Khamenei* Now the IRGC wants to do the same with the Suez Canal while pretending it's the US fault. Nobody of consequence is going to buy that. Open the strait of Hormuz and STFU.
19
Potential_Archer2427 4 days ago +9
Not suez canal, bab-el mandib where they could use houthi assistance
9
Consistentscroller 4 days ago +5
But didn't they reroute all their trade through Russia and China? So why would the American blockade be a problem Iran?
5
HoboSkid 4 days ago +12
Because the vast majority of Iran's oil exports go through the Strait of Hormuz, some estimates are at 90%. I'd be curious to read how they just rerouted millions of barrels of oil per day via land to China and Russia. I guess there's the Caspian Sea for Russia, but do they really have any infrastructure in place there?
12
MrWFL 3 days ago +2
Also, why would Russia want to buy oil?
2
dev-ai 3 days ago +2
On the Caspian Sea, they have logistical corridor for weapons with Russia, but Israel bombed some of it recently: [https://www.rferl.org/a/israel-hits-the-caspian-sea-port/33718210.html](https://www.rferl.org/a/israel-hits-the-caspian-sea-port/33718210.html)
2
No-Faithlessness2879 4 days ago +2
This is flat out stupid. Geographically it isn’t possible. How does Iran expect to get their navy ships to the Red Sea lmao. Dumb threat
2
Kaladin3104 3 days ago +4
🤦🏻‍♂️ they don’t have a navy. They would use the Houthi’s to fire missiles at ships most likely.
4
ZasdfUnreal 3 days ago +2
So Iran is claiming responsibility for the vile actions of the Houthi. Got it.
2
Hashbeez 4 days ago +1
With what? Swimming people
1
namotous 4 days ago +2
Watch out, Iran, trump gonna race to block Red Sea first lmao
2
-Switch-on- 4 days ago +1
Defense defense defense! 
1
stuckanon01 3 days ago +1
1801 (Barbary Wars) - 2026 (Iran war). Same shit different century.
1
SneakyWasHere 3 days ago +1
You can’t triple stamp a double stamp!
1
pdeisenb 3 days ago +1
Using what navy or air force? Do they think missiles and drones from mainland Iran or Houthie occupied Yemen will do it. There are three US carrier strike groups plus the Israeli Air Force and forces from other allied nations in the region. How do they expect the Egyptians and Saudis to react? Those dead IRGC mullahs are crazy!
1
yoursandforever 3 days ago +1
Both warrooms: I dunno. Ya dunno either. Hmm. Well, ya. Huh. Got it! We escalate!!  I guess, ok thinking caps on guys, what kinda-related thing can we do to get back to the top of news again?
1
dvowel 3 days ago +1
Oh yeah? I block the earth!
1
pirategirljess 3 days ago +1
um with what? daddy trump says they have no navy?
1
D3xty 3 days ago +1
Joey??? Do they know that we know that they know???
1
LiveToLoveAndLearn 3 days ago +1
US started the war to disrupt energy distribution to China. Iran reacted with their equivalent of a nuke by blocking the strait to US or other countries if they don’t pay a toll fee (not extravagant). US who saw they goal of disrupting energy distribution to China saw their objective slipping between their finger invented a nuke threat from Iran to block completely the strait. Iran reacted by stating they’ll block the Red Sea to push Europe to be more active on the negotiations and probably China. The situation could fairly easily be resolved by US going back home. However they won’t as their goal is to block energy to China. Europe, once again will be to soft and slow to clearly tell the US to look after their citizens.
1
← Back to Board