· 116 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 29, 2026 at 11:03 PM

Iran threatens to ‘rain fire’ on US troops as possible ground war looms

Posted by kootles10


Iran threatens to ‘rain fire’ on US troops as possible ground war looms | CNN
CNN
Iran threatens to ‘rain fire’ on US troops as possible ground war looms | CNN
In a message marking 30 days since the start of the Iran war, a senior Iranian official is spelling out what many ordinary people across the tense Gulf, and beyond, privately fear will be Washington’s next move.

🚩 Report this post

116 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
TopTour31 Mar 29, 2026 +68
Did anyone think Iran wasn't going to fight back here?
68
kootles10 Mar 29, 2026 +31
Unfortunately the people in charge of our armed forces
31
tracyinge Mar 29, 2026 +13
Kamala told them two years ago. And again on day one of this travesty.
13
YourShowerCompanion Mar 29, 2026 +18
But her laugh....and Hunter's laptop and Obama's birth certificate and Hillary's Benghazi and Al Gore's IDK something ^/s
18
Teigh99 Mar 30, 2026 +4
Gore told them about global warming and well that doesn't exist.
4
Foreign_Ebb_6282 Mar 30, 2026 +2
Al Gore’s Internet
2
Specialist-Clock-914 Mar 30, 2026 +2
Read this as A I Gore
2
cintune Mar 30, 2026 +1
Al Gore's Rhythm.
1
RoswellRedux Mar 29, 2026 +4
Trump. For some reason, Trump seems to think that opposition to his actions is going to be some kind of meek compliance.
4
BlondeBorednBaked Mar 30, 2026 +6
It’s what he’s used to. He’s been coddled his whole life.
6
8bitmorals Mar 29, 2026 +2
They expected them to be overpowered and afraid, typical behavior from our Rapist in Chief.
2
ilevelconcrete Mar 29, 2026 +2
I don’t think you can deny there’s a lot of cognitive dissonance regarding American troops. People are willing to pay lip service to the idea of Iranian resistance to insult Trump, but at the same time, those same people also like to say the U.S. could defeat Iran “militarily” within a few weeks.
2
Background_Cycle2985 Mar 30, 2026 -1
but that's all true
-1
IdkAbtAllThat Mar 30, 2026 +5
Obviously it's not. You've fallen for American propaganda. Our military is strong. They're not omnipotent. Clearly we're not able to defeat Iran easily, or we would have already. The most damaging part of this war that no one is talking about is how we've just shown the rest of the world that we're not nearly as dominant, or competent, as everyone thought we were. Maybe China already knew this. But they've got to be feeling much better about their standing militarily after all of this.
5
ilevelconcrete Mar 30, 2026 +2
See what I mean folks??
2
Background_Cycle2985 Mar 30, 2026 -2
what you're not seeing is why both things are true. that's on you to do the research
-2
ilevelconcrete Mar 30, 2026 +4
What “research”? You’re just parroting a bunch of retired generals and/or active arms dealers who always insist the U.S. is far more capable than it has ever demonstrated.
4
[deleted] Mar 29, 2026 -13
[deleted]
-13
tracyinge Mar 29, 2026 +20
Prevail like we did in Afghanistan? Another 20 year war you mean? From which we got, what again?
20
Puny-Earthling Mar 29, 2026 +12
*checks notes* um… Taliban control of Afghanistan I believe. 
12
Brilliant-Advisor958 Mar 29, 2026 +1
We knew it was going to happen, but how fast it happened was mind-boggling. At least to us arm chair observers.
1
veggeble Mar 30, 2026 +4
It's less mind-boggling if you remember Trump negotiated the release of 5000 imprisoned Taliban fighters right before the US withdrawal. He basically handed Afghanistan back to the Taliban on a silver platter. He also planned to host the Taliban at Camp David the same week as the 9/11 anniversary...
4
[deleted] Mar 29, 2026 -8
[deleted]
-8
samueladams6 Mar 29, 2026 +8
“From the POV of the military, the 20 year occupation was a success…” What an absolute nightmare that belief is.
8
[deleted] Mar 29, 2026 -6
[deleted]
-6
samueladams6 Mar 29, 2026 +6
“The mission here was: deny the use of Afghanistan to the Taliban…” But they didn’t do that.
6
[deleted] Mar 29, 2026 -4
[deleted]
-4
innocentious Mar 30, 2026 +2
you arent educating anyone,you are just gaslighting yourself into thinking you "won" your little 20 year special military operation while you had to run away with your tail between your legs while leaving billions of expensive equipment behind and losing a bunch of soldiers in the airport due to some suicide bombers. keep chokin on that copium
2
CryptographerShot213 Mar 30, 2026 +3
Except the Taliban regained control of the region in 2021 and since then they have reversed nearly all of the so-called progress the U.S. made. I really hate to burst your little bubble, but Al-Qaeda has a friendly relationship with the Taliban there and once again enjoys a safe haven in Afghanistan, according to UN reports. Reports have also indicated that al-Qaeda has started to reestablish its training camp infrastructure in the Panjshir Valley, as well as other areas. They are currently being strategically patient and covert. So yeah. All of our “achievements” have been reversed.
3
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026
[deleted]
0
Less-Hawk-4723 Mar 30, 2026 +3
You lost the Afghanistan war. You’ll get over it in due time. Real life wars are not a call of duty lobby K/D ratios don’t matter
3
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 -1
[deleted]
-1
Less-Hawk-4723 Mar 30, 2026 +2
The cope will continue until moral improves
2
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 +1
[deleted]
1
CryptographerShot213 Mar 30, 2026 +1
[You are just plain wrong.](https://www.kcl.ac.uk/not-your-fathers-afghanistan) And so confidently, too.
1
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 +1
[deleted]
1
CryptographerShot213 Mar 30, 2026 +1
Yes it does. You said al-qaeda does not have a safe haven in Afghanistan (a stated objective of the war), and that they do not have training centers in Afghanistan anymore (another objective). You also said the Taliban no longer has a friendly relationship with al-Qaeda (yet another objective). All of this is refuted in the article. The U.S. may have achieved those objectives at first, but once they withdrew the Taliban took over again and things are going back to the way they were before the war. It’s only a matter of time before they attack again.
1
Warm-Attempt7773 Mar 29, 2026 +3
I think the point is for the US not to prevail.  This invasion isn't intended to win
3
RipTorn1978 Mar 29, 2026 +2
This is how it seems
2
samueladams6 Mar 29, 2026 +4
How many lives are you willing to spend to “prevail,” whatever the f*** that could possibly mean in this case?
4
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026
[deleted]
0
samueladams6 Mar 30, 2026 +2
So You don’t support the war, you don’t know what the goals are. But you are sure we can win based off our stellar track record in places like Afghanistan…
2
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026
[deleted]
0
samueladams6 Mar 30, 2026 +1
What’s the goal?
1
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026
[deleted]
0
samueladams6 Mar 30, 2026 +1
Not to take away from your insane, “what happened in Afghanistan was a win” take. But I was talking about the war in Iran, which I know you don’t know the goals of.
1
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 +1
[deleted]
1
heroman3 Mar 30, 2026 +2
You guys are not winning stop you could not beat the taliban in 20 years and you could not beat the vietcong in 20 years. Seriously where do you Americans get your arrogance from? Occupying a country is way harder than invading and even then the iranian regime has prepared for an american invasion for decades. Also the terrain is just horrible for an invasion the entire country is made out of mountains for gods sake.
2
tommytwolegs Mar 30, 2026 +1
US will prevail at doing what exactly?
1
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 +1
[deleted]
1
tommytwolegs Mar 30, 2026 +1
But like, for how long lol. I think most people agree that can be done, but occupying that will be extremely expensive both financially and politically. Even then I'm not sure it's necessarily a guarantee they can completely cut off Iran's ability to threaten the straight.
1
Quadrenaro Mar 29, 2026 -8
Its a paper tiger. Their primary weapon is terror and propaganda. 
-8
StephanXX Mar 29, 2026 +4
And missiles and artillery aimed at an amphibious landing. In the twenty years of the war in Afghanistan, the US lost 2,459 (1,922 confirmed Killed in Action.) There's good reason to believe that number will be surpassed in a month of invasion of Kharg. It will literally be shooting fish in a barrel. This military boondoggle will be studied for decades to come, all on the whims of a couple of sociopaths desperate to stay in power and out of prison.
4
Quadrenaro Mar 29, 2026 -12
This is all pro-Iranian cope. These guys arent even half of what the Iraqi army was. All iran can do is murder civilians. All their tech falls apart against armed opponents. Ask ukraine.
-12
innocentious Mar 29, 2026 +6
>These guys arent even half of what the Iraqi army was. Then why they won the war vs Iraq while sadam was even using chemical weapons against them? poor lil bro forgot his history book
6
Quadrenaro Mar 30, 2026 +1
Well I'm talking more literally. Iraq had a large, and what considered for the time, good, army in 1990. Iran has far less in both weapons and manpower as of 2025. Funny enough, I've written a couple of those history books you might be citing, atleast if its in English. 
1
Downtown-Brush6940 Mar 30, 2026 +1
You are comparing warfare in the 1990s to the 2020s? Stick to history, current day analysis doesn’t work for you.
1
Quadrenaro Mar 30, 2026 +1
Well thats not exactly what I meant. I was pointing out what the US did with tech that was 70s-80s. We are now running alot of new stuff following flthe future weapons programs in response to intel gathered from the ukraine war. The US is at the hight of its power, and this war is looking like it is going to be conventional.
1
plightro Mar 30, 2026 +5
Opinions that are easy to have if it's not your ass on the line.
5
Quadrenaro Mar 30, 2026 +1
Actually my ass is on the line in this situation. Figure this next part  out on your own, but I'm getting hazard pay tonight in direct correlation to the war.
1
plightro Mar 30, 2026 +1
So you're gassing yourself up by downplaying your enemy's capabilities. That's WAY worse. Don't get yourself killed thinking they ain't shit.
1
Quadrenaro Mar 30, 2026 +1
Well... they really arent. The Iranian military uses old nazi tactics to seem bigger and better than they actually are. Which is to supress civil unrest. There's a reason Iran machine gunned 30,000 civilians last month, and it wasn't because they are strong. The nazis did the same thing, and when they were so high on their own farts, they went to war with nations who outnumbered them nearly 100/1. People said the same thing about sadam in 1990. I mean nearly word for word 
1
samueladams6 Mar 29, 2026 +3
Ask Ukraine what? You think Iran hasn’t paid attention?
3
Quadrenaro Mar 30, 2026
Ask Ukraine what Iranian weapons are optimized for. They are weapons of terror. They are used for killing civilians almost exclusively.
0
samueladams6 Mar 30, 2026 +3
And the US and Israel have only weapons of freedom I’m sure. You really think Iran hasn’t learned anything from watching how Ukraine defends itself?
3
Quadrenaro Mar 30, 2026
No, they have weapons of war. Iran supports the russian war of aggression against Ukraine. Iranian weapons are keeping the russian army going, and fuels terrorism against a sovereign European nation. Hey I got a serious question. Do you denounce the terrorist state of Russia, and its allies that support them? This is more or less a b0t-ch3ck question. Its honestly been a really good filtration tactic.
0
samueladams6 Mar 30, 2026 +1
And the difference between weapons of terror and war are? How is the US military not vulnerable to these terror weapons?
1
Quadrenaro Mar 30, 2026 +1
Weapons of terror are designed to be effective against soft targets, such as Ukrainian residential buildings, miles away from any infrastructure.  Iran's entire MO is to house military institutions in or next to civilian networks. The west largely frowns on this, but is regimes defined by religious fascism, civilian deaths are seen as useful propaganda tools, wether it be their own or their enemies. The nazis were famous for this.
1
StephanXX Mar 30, 2026 +1
I'm a Marine. I have love for my country, and my Marine brothers, and tears for the way their lives are about to be wasted. Amphibious operations are the most dangerous. Iran is a fortified enemy defending their home turf. This war isn't going to turn Iran into a healthy pro-western country, it's going to be a slog that has already destroyed what little soft power the US had claim to. Their $5k drones will exhaust our million dollar each defensive missile supply. If Iran believes they cannot recaptur the island, their artillery will turn that island into Gaza in three months with thousands of US casualties. We have dozens of retired US generals expressing their grim outlook on any form of boots-on-ground invasion. It will end up costing us trillions of dollars. What _exactly_ do you think the benefits of this "military operation" will be? At best, we're looking at the US paying $7/gallon for gasoline, at Russia quadrupling their oil profits, of oil dependent countries experiencing a worse energy crisis that we saw under Carter, and the US military exhausting their stockpiles before finally packing up and abandoning this ridiculous failure of a war. Tell me, really, exactly, why do you think we should risk so many lives, so much national treasure, and what was left of our global power for this stupid war?
1
FancyEmployee8672 Mar 29, 2026 +3
terror and propaganda is closing the strait rn?
3
Quadrenaro Mar 30, 2026 -4
Yeah. Thats the definition of terror.
-4
Kyzzz Mar 30, 2026 +5
What about raining down tomahawk missiles on schoolchildren in an illegal war in the midst of diplomatic “negotiations”?
5
Quadrenaro Mar 30, 2026 -2
Thats demonstrably different.
-2
Less-Hawk-4723 Mar 30, 2026 +3
How so? Enlighten us
3
Quadrenaro Mar 30, 2026 -1
Sure. Iran claims the US struck a school. Their claim is that the school was at a "former" military munitions depot. The US's claim is that it was still an active depot and there were no kids.  Either way, both sides agree that Intel shows it was at one point a viable military target, but was on site of a currently viable military target. Tldr: it was located on a military site.
-1
Less-Hawk-4723 Mar 30, 2026 +1
US can claim whatever they want to claim, it still ended up killing 170+ kids, where is the all too mighty and famous US and Israeli intelligence? Just because a school is close or in a military site, doesn't give free reign to just evaporate it. That's the excuse terrorists usually give.
1
Quadrenaro Mar 30, 2026 +1
If it is even true, the fascist regime of Iran is fully at fault for using children as human shields on a military site, and in a building known to house weapons. I dont understand why this is so hard to understand. Like, do you u destiny my perspective here?
1
tracyinge Mar 29, 2026 +22
You cannot fight a ground war against people bunkered in caves. One would think we would have learned that by now.
22
kootles10 Mar 29, 2026 +11
Almost like it's a quagmire....again
11
TigerGrizzCubs78 Mar 29, 2026 +6
And another self inflicted one
6
mok000 Mar 30, 2026 +1
And you cannot fight a ground war when you have no good way to get on that ground with all you need for the troops including equipment, food and water.
1
kootles10 Mar 29, 2026 +8
From the article: In a message marking 30 days since the start of the Iran war, a senior Iranian official is spelling out what many ordinary people across the tense Gulf, and beyond, privately fear will be Washington’s next move. “The enemy signals negotiation in public, while in secret it plots a ground attack,” reads the statement from Iranian Parliament Speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. Washington still insists negotiations with Iran are progressing, while deploying thousands of troops to the region, some of which – including 3,500 that arrived from Asia this weekend – have now started to assemble. Much speculation has been focused on US forces potentially seizing Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil terminal in the Persian Gulf. Taking it would cut off a key economic lifeline to the Islamic Republic, in the hope of starving its Revolutionary Guards of essential funding from oil exports. No plans have been made public, but US troops could also be ordered to seize coastal positions to try and reopen the narrow Strait of Hormuz, a strategic energy choke-point that Iran has effectively blocked since the start of US and Israeli strikes at the end of February, provoking an acute oil and gas supply shock that is reverberating through global markets. But, as has been widely discussed, putting US boots on the ground would carry enormous risks, not least because possible ground operations have been telegraphed by Washington for weeks, while apparently unprepared US forces scattered across the world have been slowly amassed. In his message, Ghalibaf warned that Iranian forces are already “waiting for American soldiers to enter on the ground so they can rain fire upon them”. Without the element of surprise, a US ground operation, even with vastly superior firepower, could quickly turn into a bloodbath.
8
GigMistress Mar 29, 2026 +9
In secret? They're planning the ground invasion in press conferences.
9
LovelyClementine Mar 30, 2026 +1
Both sides are lying.
1
phd2k1 Mar 30, 2026 +1
I would prefer that we didn’t send young people to die in order to distract from the Epstein files.
1
reddittorbrigade Mar 29, 2026 +17
For every American soldier dying of Trump's war, all Trump voters are responsible for it too.
17
Choice-of-SteinsGate Mar 29, 2026 +9
Donald Trump never had a plan for a drawn out conflict. This is the result of poor planning, arrogance and incompetence. It's also about Netanyahu's enthusiasm for war with his middle east neighbors and Trump being the perfect useful idiot to help him achieve his decades-long dream of decimating Iran, its proxies, and everything the Islamic Republic represents. I mean, we literally have Bibi on video admitting that he's been waiting for this moment for FORTY years, and that with enough of a push and just the right amount of flattery, he could get Donald Trump, the ideal American chump, to throw his military support behind Israel in its long awaited war against its greatest enemy. He was right. Trump has been escalating tensions and hostilities with Iran ever since he stepped foot into office. Crippling sanctions, assassinations, excessive airstrikes, his abandonment of the JCPOA—a campaign of "maximum pressure." And yeah, this war is also about Trump's ego, or his desire to project his own strength through the unbridled use of the military. You know, good ol fashion US imperialism... After Venezuela, Trump got it in his head that he could decapitate any government that opposes him. But it's not really going as planned—because there was no plan. And besides, in Venezuela, Trump removed Maduro from power but kept the oppressive government intact in return for their cooperation. So much for liberating the people... That said, other than wholesale destruction, what the f*** have we actually accomplished in Iran? The regime hasn't "changed," the Iranian people have not been "liberated," Iran was never building a nuclear weapon, nor did they pose an "imminent threat" to the United States. Meaning of course that this war was conducted under false pretenses and Trump's cabinet has been trying hopelessly (and failing) to cover up that fact, which is why their messaging has been so erratic and inconsistent. A war that ignored lessons from history about what happens when the US tries "regime change" in the middle east. An illegal war that was launched without consulting with our allies or Congress. A war that was always one of choice, not of necessity. And now Trump is desperately searching for an offramp. Like when he told the Iranian people to "rise up" and "overtake" their government because he wanted to wipe his hands clean of the bloody aftermath of a war he helped start with no long-term, coherent strategy for the future. However, Trump can't just up and leave because, for one, it would signal defeat and/or reflect very poorly on him, but more important than that, because he helped trigger a global energy crisis after dismissing warnings about very obvious Iranian countermeasures in the Strait of Hormuz and Persian Gulf. And while Trump is pushing back deadlines and claiming that the war is "winding down," or that "productive conversations" are happening, he is simultaneously sending thousands of *more* troops to the region and demanding *more* money from the government to fuel operation "epic failure." At the same time, Israel is bombing Iran's Capital and Iran is firing back at neighboring countries. The war is only expanding and conflict is being reignited between Israel and Hezbollah. Oh, and the Houthis just joined the fight. So much for this war "winding down." Worse yet, American troops are dead and dying and we continue to bomb Iran with no regard for the civilians we're supposed to be "liberating." MILLIONS of people have been displaced across the Middle East. Thousands of innocent noncombatants have been killed in this war so far—some of them CHILDREN at the hands of our own military and its incompetent commander in chief. Together, the US and Israel are shelling schools, hospitals, heritage sites, non-military and civilian infrastructure, and even residential areas. Some Iranians doubt whether regime change is realistic and whether this war is even worth it... As far as "regime change" goes, the already dying Ayatollah was replaced by his more hardline son who we've managed to radicalize all the same after killing his entire family, and who has deep connections and sway with the IRGC. Additionally, one fifth of the population still supports the Islamic Republic and grieves the deaths of prominent Iranian leaders. When it comes to the economic side of things, this war has caused a worldwide oil crisis, which has both short and long term repercussions for the American economy, and an economy that was already sliding before the war even began. A ground invasion is all but inevitable at this point because we presently have nothing to really show for our efforts. Without "boots on the ground," the administration can't achieve its constantly shifting goals. Goals without the vision, capability or expertise to carry them out. Assurances without planning and preparation. In other words, flights of fancy. And because, under false pretenses, the Trump administration plunged head first into this war, with a little nudge from Netanyahu of course, there's now no other feasible way to facilitate structural change in Iran, no other way to seize control of the Strait of Hormuz, no chance of poaching whatever uranium Iran has left lying around, and no possibility at all of taking Kharg Island and thus crippling Iran's oil production indefinitely. For that matter, if the US doesn't launch a ground invasion, it can't make up for its incompetency, its many oversights and a lack of any meaningful results (sunk cost fallacy). At this point, ordering troops to invade Iran is the only way for the US to at least appear like it's committing to "objectives" that don't just involve bombing the f*** out of the country.
9
threehundredthousand Mar 29, 2026 +9
Veterans overwhelmingly voted for this. Over and over and over.
9
Smile_Space Mar 29, 2026 +4
Man, I can only imagine how nervous our troops are over there. We exited Afghanistan 5 years ago. So, a BUNCH of the experienced troops from that era aren't even serving any more, meaning these guys are fairly green in terms of actually being fired upon. And all for what? To stroke Republican egos?
4
BakedPotatoDutton Mar 30, 2026 +4
Iran has every moral right to fire on American terrorists invading their territory. The most ethical solution to all of this is for Israel and America to simply stop the invasion and end the violence. And if they don't, continued retaliation (from anyone) against these countries will continue to be morally justified.
4
PsychedelicMagnetism Mar 30, 2026 +1
Only now Iran is fully aware of how much power they have in blocking the straight and are demanding the right to claim tolls on ships passing through the straights.
1
OkSir7411 Mar 29, 2026 +6
Who wants to go fight and die to distract from the Epstein files all while the government violates the Constitution in the process?  
6
TRex_Chef Mar 30, 2026 +1
Every US soldier wound and death is directly trumps fault. Remember maga terrorists causing this in November, or if you see them in public.
1
Theferael_me Mar 29, 2026 +4
Trump could end the war tomorrow if he wanted. He doesn't want and so the war goes on.
4
Virtual-Squirrel-725 Mar 29, 2026 +9
Three weeks ago he could have, not anymore. Iran has their hands on the throat of the world economy and they're not going to let go until they get serious concessions.
9
dirtymirror Mar 29, 2026 +7
Actually he can’t. Iran gets a say. They’ve been hit very hard but they’re still standing and there’s no reason for them to stop the fight until they’ve visited sufficient pain on their enemies to make them think twice before trying again.
7
Theferael_me Mar 29, 2026 +3
Sure he can. He can grovel and apologise. He can pay billions in reparations for the illegal strikes and as compensation for the deaths of thousands of Iranian civilians and servicemen. He can vow to close US bases in the Middle East over the course of the next five years. I'm sure Iran would open the Strait of Hormuz in return.
3
samueladams6 Mar 29, 2026 +4
Would you trust Trump to do that if he said he intended to do that tomorrow?
4
Theferael_me Mar 29, 2026
If he doesn't then Iran can just go back to blocking the Strait.
0
samueladams6 Mar 29, 2026 +5
Well they don’t trust him, for good reason. And aren’t going to open shit on a promise from a senile man who lies all the time.
5
strawberrybubbl Mar 29, 2026 +2
Why would anyone trust what the administration has to say on anything?
2
samueladams6 Mar 29, 2026 +3
They don’t.
3
strawberrybubbl Mar 29, 2026 +2
No he couldnt. Even if he cowarded out, israel will still go on and iran would still attack. He woke up a bear and its not going to sleep anytime soon.
2
Theferael_me Mar 30, 2026 +4
The US could've stopped Israel any time it wanted. It chooses not to.
4
ENORMOUS_HORSECOCK Mar 30, 2026 +1
I've heard and continue to hear a lot about people leaving the military through their legal means to do so and I could see why. They're planning on deploying these kids to places where the Iranians can easily reach them with their short-range weapons in an intensely unpopular war that doesn't seem to benefit Americans in any context.
1
11Tail Mar 29, 2026 +4
Praying for the safety of all service members stuck in Trump's attempt to divert attention away from the Epstein files.
4
kootles10 Mar 29, 2026 +7
In the words of a sign that I saw on Saturday: Bombing for peace is like f****** for virginity
7
TigerGrizzCubs78 Mar 29, 2026 +2
Also makes me think of the song War Pimp Renaissance from Lard (Jello Biafra and Al Jourgensen) that satirized the military industrial complex after the Cold War. Had a line in it that said "A general that's never been to war is like a rapist whose never been laid"
2
111anza Mar 30, 2026 +1
Well, this is going to be really bad. The reality is that US has no way out other than sending in ground troop as a desperate attempt to try to improve this mess. The problem is that the so called epic fury failed to put a dent on Iran's missle and drone strike capability while depleting the US air defense and precision strike munition. This means the group troop will be entering hostile territory with diminished air defense and no air superiority. Since WW2, US has dominate the air and ensure defense before deployment. The casualty rate of attacking iran will likeoy be much higher than any other wars the US has seen in modern history.
1
NJcovidvaccinetips Mar 30, 2026 +1
Good this war is fucked
1
Gooser3000 Mar 30, 2026 +1
There’s potentially 10 million people that would fight.
1
duncandun Mar 30, 2026 +1
considering they haven't been able to protect their multi billion dollar limited radar systems like THAAD from iranian missiles, i have to guess they'll have a hard time protecting ground forces which they care far less about
1
SugarSwayyy Mar 29, 2026 +1
This situation seems to be escalating quickly, and it’s concerning for everyone involved.
1
CrustyTh3Punk Mar 29, 2026 +1
Just do it. There’s nothing we can do in enough time to stop it so just feed the meat grinder and be done. I’ll just put that moment in the part of my brain that can’t get rid of Hind Rijab’s little voice on that phone call. It’s all horrifying and I’m just numb.
1
CherryWhisprr Mar 30, 2026 +1
It’s a reminder that words from leaders can have a real impact on how people feel and what happens next.
1
mwkingSD Mar 30, 2026 +1
“Rain fire” - code words for tactical nuclear weapons? someone in DC needs to find their balls and spine and stop this madness before it turns very, very bad.
1
← Back to Board