· 198 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 15, 2026 at 7:56 PM

Iran to execute first woman over anti-regime protests

Posted by torina-to

Iran to execute first woman over anti-regime protests
torontosun
Iran to execute first woman over anti-regime protests
Iran is set to execute four people accused of participating in anti-government protests earlier this year. Read on.
🚩 Report this post

198 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
IOnlyFearOFGod 3 days ago +3318
First woman? they weren't executing them before?
3318
I_Have_A_Nightmare 3 days ago +2609
Well indiscriminately in a crowd during the protest yes.
2609
Jesuismieux412 3 days ago +407
Christ…this comment hit hard.
407
t_ran_asuarus_rex 3 days ago +109
Did you mean “doctor”?
109
Beneatheearth 3 days ago +31
Or is that Red Cross worker lol
31
Lanster27 3 days ago +15
Christ... this doctor hit hard?
15
balooaroos 3 days ago +569
"Iran to execute first woman **for anti-regime protests**". They've surely executed women unrelated to the recent protests. They probably *murdered* hundreds of women during the protests too, but now they're in the phase where they're executing the death sentences given to the people they arrested during the protests.
569
Abbx 3 days ago +192
> "Iran to execute first woman for anti-regime protests" Which is still bullshit. Even if limited to the recent war. They execute people daily there and it is hushed and underreported. People need to remember that Iran is currently silenced and deafened to the outside world. They cannot tell us anything the regime does not want us to know. Yes there are few people who are buying small 1GB whitelisted data packs sold on the black market over there, but not like anyone is giving them a voice or platform. I don't have a ton of info but my wife is currently "stuck" in Iran as a native stuck in immigration/war limbo and I've spoken to friends there as well. If anyone's curious on anything and I can answer feel free to ask.
192
HotTestesHypothesis 3 days ago +55
I hope you'll be reunited soon. It must be hard not knowing when it will happen, if at all.
55
Abbx 3 days ago +20
Thank you, I appreciate that. It is pretty hard. We're working and sort of adapting our independent lives until we can know how to further proceed together, given the circumstances. It's just, very messy times. Not that we plan on giving up.
20
soapinmouth 3 days ago +15
How do they feel about the chances of a people's coup of the Ayatollah while they are weakened, is there any chance at all? What's the biggest impediment, weapons, willingness, fear?
15
Abbx 3 days ago +34
This is tough to really answer, but I can say a few things on it. Upcoming longwinded answers sorry lol. If they are weakened *enough*, as in we continue this war against the Islamic Republic and perhaps even have a couple allies chime in (low odds given the ill-preparation of the war and global relations since Mr. Orange Man is so smart) then, yeah. I think Iranians could have a good shot at seizing control, but this would need to go on for a while and insurgence would need to brood for a while as well. It already kind of is. As you might know, 10's of thousands died for protesting in January, and that's not their first rodeo at protester deaths. Just the worst of it in modern day. Because of that, they are being far more careful when it comes to protesting because of how risky it is. You'll either be shot dead or arrested and then executed. Meanwhile, several regime supporters can be seen holding flags and making chants, some with megaphones, when driving by popular streets or tunnel passes (There is video evidence online and it is also corroborated by my wife and friends in the country) in order to support them. And they're paid actors really. They're allowed and encouraged to do that without risk of death. Free speech if it aligns with the country's propaganda, right? I'm bringing up the above because I'm trying to prepare the point that there have also been 2-3, possibly more, new anonymous defense/rebellion groups that have popped up, claiming the regimes days are numbered, from within and outside Iran. This means we are now witnessing factions that are ready for rebellion. They will not attach a face to it for risk of death, but we can know that there is brooding and increasing contempt against the regime now during this war and with all the recent life lost. People want better for themselves. There's a chance. And I'm rooting on it. As far as impediments, it's definitely the lack of global support and pressure on the regime (aside from weapons). The internet being down so voices cannot be heard. They know that, so they're sort of playing nice politically and acting like they aren't all too bad with their allies. Meanwhile Trumps a lunatic and Israel is Israel so Iran is positioned in a way that makes this a little too easy for them, sadly... Iranians all have a combination of willingness and fear. Comes with the package. It's just, again within your points, they have no weapons or training. The IRGC is about 150k+ strong and there are additionally basij (Government paid men in plainsclothes) in the hundreds of thousands. We don't even know how many in total, but a lot. With all that power and loyalty to a religious government and ideology, it's hard to do anyhing about that especially without weapons.
34
soapinmouth 3 days ago +2
Thanks, appreciate the perspective
2
CharcoalGreyWolf 3 days ago +7
I think going without head covering is honestly an anti-regime protest, and women have died for that after challenging the morality police who arrested them.
7
whereismo293 3 days ago +490
They've been executing them since I was a little kid in iran, the tittle is just to draw people in at a time like this.
490
Wompatuckrule 3 days ago +223
The article is more specific than the headline: >the first woman due to be hanged following the protests that broke out across the country in January
223
FewResearcher2606 3 days ago +30
For context, we had multiple protests against the regime (on a nation wide scale) Last solar year 1404 (January 2026) Another at 1401 (2022) And also 1398 (2019) And obviously the famous green movement of 1388 too (2009) They sentenced a lot of protestors to death, but this is the first Death sentence for a woman who participated in 2026 protests.
30
Wompatuckrule 3 days ago +3
Yeah, the headline probably could've conveyed that they were only talking about this year. On the other hand you'd have to be new to the planet to not already understand that the regime has had many protests against it over the last decades and that they have executed women as part of those.
3
willargue4karma 3 days ago +2
yeah i took it implicitly as what the commenter above you said i get people being annoyed, but its a headline. its meant to grab you, not explain in detail the entire new story unless its something like HITLER DEAD lol, then i guess the headline suffices
2
Wompatuckrule 3 days ago +2
Wait?!? What just happened to Hitler????!!!!! /jk
2
GrimpenMar 3 days ago +80
Yeah, the tens of thousands gunned down indiscriminately don't count towards this.
80
Wompatuckrule 3 days ago +121
People gunned down in a crowd do not count towards the number of imprisoned people being executed by hanging. Correct. The article is about a specific thing, trying to move the subject does not make the articles claim untrue.
121
GrimpenMar 3 days ago +16
Not disputing the article, just making it clear that the headline's first is very conditional, and that the depravity of the IRGC is much larger than even this headline suggests.
16
Wompatuckrule 3 days ago +20
It's newsworthy that the regime is executing an imprisoned woman from the protests. That doesn't take away from the horrors recently committed by them. This story is "in addition to" that information not "instead of" it.
20
GrimpenMar 3 days ago +3
Absolutely agree. I just want people to remember how debased the regime is. I've come to expect uninformed people to read the headline and conflate these events. You've already got pro-regime pundits ignoring the prior atrocities.
3
Kakkoister 3 days ago +3
It's more like the title is a bit too open for interpretation. It should be read as "The first woman sentenced to execution SINCE the protests happened.", as the sentencing is a "legal" result of actions taken at the last protest. But the title can also be interpreted as saying it's the first women ever sentenced to execution, because of the protests.
3
Array_626 3 days ago +10
Its not a bad reminder tbh. Iran's regime is still genuinely terrible regardless of what you think about Trump and his motives. Idk if this is going to raise support for the war, but it might at least reduce some of the vocal opposition for it.
10
ZzZzZzZzZzZero 3 days ago +38
For anti regime protests. Before they just executed them for being in public without permission I suppose.
38
Pterafractyl 3 days ago +5
It was more of a sport before. Now it's political.
5
entropy13 3 days ago +5
First woman specifically executed for the recent protests, they’ve been executing women since 1979
5
Nessie_of_the_Loch 3 days ago +3
First woman of that particular day.
3
Comfortable_Gur8311 3 days ago +787
F*** these guys
787
scienide 3 days ago +29
You would think that, with all of the experience in South America, what with the CIA and covert operations, the US government could affect a regime change operation. But no, the ham-fisted half assed approach with all the humanitarian and economical collateral damage was the only way Trump thought appropriate.
29
PuppyPuppy_PowPow 3 days ago +1739
Sickening. Don’t take freedom of speech for granted.
1739
Briguy_fieri 3 days ago +575
Actual freedom of speech*. Getting kicked out of a restaurant for cursing is not a violation of freedom of speech
575
ComradePotato 3 days ago +313
Even if I was enjoying a succulent Chinese me-al?
313
HappyGoElephant 3 days ago +117
Gentlemen, this is democracy manifest
117
GMN123 3 days ago +25
RIP, surprisingly eloquent Australian man
25
Preface 3 days ago +25
Get your hands off my p****!
25
severed13 3 days ago +25
I see you know your judo well!
25
GrimpenMar 3 days ago +11
Gentlemen, this is democracy manifest!
11
GodzillaUK 3 days ago +23
It is however, hilarious to see so long as the staff are unharmed.
23
CircumspectCapybara 3 days ago +36
Reminder that "actual freedom of speech" can really only be a protection *from the government* for penalizing you for what you say. It can't be an entitlement that other private entities (restaurants, employers, social media platforms, or friends) *must* be obligated to do business with you or associate with you no matter what you say. That's because part of the whole idea of freedom of speech (both in the American tradition and in the UN UDHR) is freedom against compelled speech, and "freedom of association" which means you're not compelled to associate with anyone you don't want to, and you don't even need a particularly good reason to exercise your right not to do business with or associate with someone. If for example, YouTube doesn't like you because the office dog barked at your video, they are totally within their rights to take down your content and kick you off their platform (to deplatform you), because that's *their* freedom of speech rights, in the same way that you are not obligated to host me at your house or let me put up posters on the side of your house except at your pleasure. To force otherwise ("you two *must* be friends" or "you must do business with this party" or "you must allow this person to use your private platform to advance their ideas and content" or "you must run your business this way") would be *compelled speech*, which freedom of speech protects against. Think about Anthropic's suit against the Department of War. The whole crux of the issue is Anthropic's free speech rights are being violated, that the government forcing them to run their business a certain way and provide a certain product or service in a way they don't want to but penalizing them if they don't do it amounts to compelled speech, and that ain't right. So ironically, freedom of speech means people and private entities are free to ban you and not do business with or give you a platform if they don't want to, and that's *their* freedom of speech rights. Only the government is restricted from taking adverse action against you. And of course only up to a point, e.g., the "clear and present danger" / "imminent, lawless action" tests.
36
Zanos 3 days ago +6
> It can't be an entitlement that other private entities (restaurants, employers, social media platforms, or friends) must be obligated to do business with you or associate with you no matter what you say. Social Media platforms however cannot benefit from section 230, which defends them from the legal consequences of the speech the users of their platform post, if they step over the line from a platform into being a publisher or editor. Arguably a social media website that is heavily moderated to filter out certain non-illegal content, and has an algorithm that heavily pushes users with certain mindsets over others, ceases to be merely a 'platform.' If the only things you see are what the algorithm wants you to see, it's pretty difficult to argue a social media website is less responsible than a newspaper, or TV news outlet.
6
customcharacter 3 days ago +14
Yeah, that's great...until a corporation owns the streets you stand on, and bans you from protesting their work conditions under the idea of "I don't want people to associate my streets with your speech". The *concept* of 'freedom of speech' goes beyond the wording of the American First Amendment.
14
CircumspectCapybara 3 days ago +8
> The concept of 'freedom of speech' goes beyond the wording of the American First Amendment. Yeah and in all common conceptions of it (including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) includes freedom of association and the right against compelled speech. Freedom of speech (the ideal, not the American legal term) always cuts both ways.
8
customcharacter 3 days ago +12
I want to be clear that I agree with you *in a vacuum.* The problem is that we don't live in a vacuum. When corporations are counted as people in this discussion, and care isn't taken to make sure there is a public space where speech isn't impeded, it results in [corporate control of speech](https://x.com/GyaruGlow/status/2044216006239723904). And it's *especially* true when the corporations don't have humans involved in their enforcement of their associations - see the advancement and arms-race of 'algorithm-speak' terms like 'unalive' or 'PDF-file'. It's also worth noting that the Universal Declaration implicitly supports this (emphasis mine): > Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas **through any media and regardless of frontiers.**
12
Boys4Ever 3 days ago +612
That’s just sick
612
makethislifecount 3 days ago +973
Just to be clear, this is the first woman in the most recent batch of executions that started this week. They have executed women loads of times before this. Uncountable really. Edit: they also have the horrible practice of raping women before executing them. They believe virgin women would go to heaven so a guard “marries” her the night before to prevent this. The Islamic regime is disgusting and their crimes should not go excused.
973
Vancityrules 3 days ago +144
I can't upvote this comment enough. Everytime I tell anyone this fact they look at me dubiously half believing such a horrible thing is even possible. Well it is and imagine this was your dear child, wife, family member. 
144
tacbacon10101 2 days ago +4
F****** evil. Thank you for spreading awareness of these practices.
4
monkeyhoward 3 days ago +206
How much better our lives would be if we could just get rid of all these megalomaniac, dictatorial, narcissistic, POS “rulers”, Presidents, Prime Ministers, Dear Leaders, and Ayatollahs F*** them all Send them all to hell
206
cXs808 3 days ago +18
Deleting a leader has never worked in USA's long history of meddling in the middle east. Not once.
18
GibbysUSSA 2 days ago +3
You specified the middle east. Has deleting a leader in the USA's long history of meddling in other parts of the world ever produced the desired results?
3
cXs808 2 days ago +5
The middle east is the most complicated geopolitical area. And no, it hasn't worked out swimmingly in general.
5
Evil_Knot 3 days ago +5
You forgot to include anyone that actually controls the geopolitical landscape.
5
jello1990 3 days ago +345
They already executed thousands of people for protesting a couple weeks before the war started.
345
balooaroos 3 days ago +69
Executed here means "to carry out a plan", as in this woman has been sentenced to death and the sentence will soon be executed, but yeah people sometimes use "executed" informally in place of "killed". They don't really mean the same thing though. The protesters were straight up killed or murdered, while executed implies there was a process - the person was brought before an **executioner**, their body placed in a defenseless position in front of them, and then the death sentence was carried out.
69
chth 3 days ago +33
Just to add, the proper English term for the government unlawfully murdering people is called “extrajudicial killing” while the act of a law enforcement officer or military officer killing someone without legal process like a trial is called a “summary execution”. Both are considered violations of international human rights.
33
balooaroos 3 days ago +8
Thanks for that. I know many people here speak English as a second or even third language. It may seem confusing that there are all these different terms for "killed", but these are words for HOW a person was killed. A similar example is that drowned and suffocated don't mean the same thing. Both tell you a person died, but the words mean more than that, they're communicating HOW a person died.
8
Bulky_Reveal_1937 3 days ago +441
i will never forget the story an Iranian refugee once told me. Her 2 nieces were caught with flyers for feminist activism at school. They were 12 and 13 iirc. They were taken and executed by gunfire. Her sister got a bill in the mail detailing the cost she had to pay for the bullets used for the execution.
441
americanmuscle1988 3 days ago +126
Unbelievable. I can ot understand how the government and their few followers sleep at night.
126
Kevin_LeStrange 3 days ago +99
They sleep the sleep of the just, because in their minds what they're doing is right.
99
VarmintSchtick 3 days ago +28
"Everyone is the hero of the story in their mind's eye."
28
Iron_Disciple 3 days ago +8
How could shooting little girls be right to anyone. They have defunct brains, literally the outcome of generations of Islamic inbreeding
8
Kevin_LeStrange 3 days ago +5
Committing wrongs for the "right" reasons can be justifiable to anybody who is that much of a true believer.
5
Combat_Proctologist 2 days ago +2
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
2
rotomangler 3 days ago +35
They used to tell that joke about the Russians and the Chinese.
35
EnhancedWithAi 3 days ago +10
I know Trump is deranged, I know he's a megalomaniac, I know he's a POS, but even after all this. America is still not the bad guy a lot of people try to paint them as in this whole conflict. If there's one war I want America to win, it's this one. Iran deserves to be free it's insane, they are the heart beat of history, they are the reason we have so much cool shit even to this day with the Ancient Greeks. Bring my Iranians freedom and let their brilliant people share their magic to the world as they once have before.
10
gregallen1989 3 days ago +52
Meet the new regime. Same as the old regime.
52
sayn3ver 3 days ago +14
Except now with Hormuz toll revenue
14
happy-cig 3 days ago +403
Ooo where are the Iranian bots? 
403
Gooch_Doctor 3 days ago +178
On TikTok
178
_Figaro 3 days ago +189
There are plenty on listnook too
189
GettinWiggyWiddit 3 days ago +92
PLENTY on Listnook
92
Father_Dowling 3 days ago +33
Shit, I caught a ban for suggesting that Iran's pivot to economic war should be reciprocated.
33
____DEADPOOL_______ 3 days ago +24
They're on Facebook as well. Openly casting doubt, calling Persians Israeli spies while having Khomeini's profile photo.
24
CircumspectCapybara 3 days ago +126
Too busy spending all their inference capacity on generating AI slop propaganda videos. And then spending the rest of their compute budget on Listnook bots to glaze these videos and praise the Islamic Republic of Iran's regime and their actions in this war.
126
Sad_Record_2767 3 days ago +3
The c130 rescue one was pretty entertaining. lol
3
Ultra_Metal 3 days ago +89
They're figuring out how they can blame this on the Jews.
89
_HIST 3 days ago +50
No need to blame them directly. Just say something like "But Israel did this one thing..." 500 upvotes
50
IntelArtiGen 3 days ago +37
It's truly a recurring pattern in these posts.
37
Ultra_Metal 3 days ago +2
Because there is an organized disinformation campaign targeting Listnook. [The Terrorist Propaganda to Listnook Pipeline](https://www.piratewires.com/p/the-terrorist-propaganda-to-listnook-pipeline)
2
Icy_Reception9719 3 days ago +35
Not to worry, I have no doubt the various Iranian embassies will post another zinger of a meme later and this will all blow over
35
balooaroos 3 days ago +10
This was only at 85% earlier, so they tried to kill it before it could get traction.
10
Proud-Enthusiasm-608 3 days ago +7
They are searching for the next fad.
7
TDeez_Nuts 3 days ago +4
Executed 
4
Midzotics 3 days ago +10
No, no, no; first one that they identified, the others were indiscriminate.
10
_Figaro 3 days ago +118
This might be a hard concept to understand for listnook, but just because what the US and Israel are doing is wrong doesn't excuse the murderous IRGC regime.
118
femspective 3 days ago +52
Listnook doesn’t understand nuance. Everything is black and white for them.
52
nukacola12 3 days ago +4
People have been ignoring Iran for years now. They don't actually give a shit about the people in Iran.
4
cyberianscribe 3 days ago +514
Another reminder why this regime needs to be eradicated.
514
OnlyNeedJuan 3 days ago +232
Yes, but doing it half-assed is only gonna keep the status quo, you need to go in with a plan, and even then, a certain superpower has shown that their planned invasions are good at leaving places in worse states than they were found in.
232
84Cressida 3 days ago +132
Iraq is better today than 2003.
132
houleskis 3 days ago +59
And that took a decade of on the ground engagements under questionable pretenses (or outright lies) which proved to be extremely unpopular with Americans.
59
84Cressida 3 days ago +39
Not saying the justification was right and costs weren’t extraordinary but they are undeniably a better country today than 2003. If they continue to trend that way, history may look at that in a different lense long after we are gone.
39
FriendshipRemote130 3 days ago +46
a better country if you dont ask the million of civilians dead 
46
kahboos 3 days ago +21
theyre dead & cant answer that question regardless
21
LilyBelle504 3 days ago +17
One could apply that same logic to the Kurds Saddam genocided in the Anfal campaign. So let's stop this sophistry. Is Iraq in a better position than it was in the past? Probably. It's not invading neighboring countries, or committing genocides every now and then against it's own people with chemical weapons. And has a more egalitarian system, with better international relations than it did prior. Does that justify civilians being killed in a war of false pretenses (many of whom died due to Iraqi forces by the way)? Nope. That's separate from is Iraq better off today though.
17
probablyNotARSNBot 3 days ago +10
Right sentiment, wrong numbers. Even the most aggressive estimates were 400k, true range is around 150k-400k. Again, right sentiment.
10
Hautamaki 3 days ago +3
Right now the lens history is looking at Iraq through is that if they had done it right in the first place, Iraq could probably have gotten to its 2023 state by 2013 if not sooner, and saved the Middle East and Europe for that matter a hell of a lot of refugees and needless suffering and death. And now Trump is going into Iran with no plan at all, no allies at all, no preparation at all, just Bibi desperately trying to stay one step ahead of the law showing him an epic slideshow of missiles blowing shit up and saying hey Donnie, Iran's whole leadership is doing an all hands meeting in a few days, wouldn't it be amazing if we blew them all up? They tried to do the same thing to you, and they're gonna get nukes any day now. Annnnny day now. Let's do it, whaddaya say? Yeah, history is not going to look kindly on this, even if Iran somehow turns out better 20 years later.
3
zashuna 3 days ago +11
Ehh, according to [polls](https://youtu.be/7_zeRkiauMw?si=QtSr_z02aJsiq70W), Iraqis sure as hell don't feel that way.
11
hilfigertout 3 days ago +3
ISIS was a thing that happened in the wake of the invasion... we all remember that, right?
3
UriKaai 3 days ago +10
is it?
10
PontiusPilatesss 3 days ago +17
What about Afghanistan?
17
Tacoman404 3 days ago +11
Urban centers are more modern but rural areas are run like the middle ages.
11
SaxifrageRussel 3 days ago +19
And how many Iraqi civilians were killed?
19
BatThumb 3 days ago +27
The only way you're taking Iran is a full on invasion that will probably cost tens of thousands of American lives and plenty more of Iranian lives. And then what? Regime change? Hasn't worked well for the most part If Iran wants change, they need to do it themselves. Lots of countries have had revolutions to change themselves for the better. Real change only happens from within though. If America does it then it just leaves the opposition to question the legitimacy. The Iranian people need to want to change and they need to do it themselves
27
therealgreatness26 3 days ago +83
Iranians themselves have been trying to topple the regime since the 2009 Green Movement. I was there during that time. What are you talking about? The difference is the Islamic Republic will mass murder their own citizens, because due to their Sharia ideology and law, they are “Waging war against god.”
83
aedroogo 3 days ago +29
They DO want change! From being massacred in the street? Yes, they're plenty ready for change. Problem in their govt. is strong and f****** brutal. They tried to do it themselves. They need help.
29
SadSecurity 3 days ago +2
> Yes, but doing it half-assed is only gonna keep the status quo, you need to go in with a plan Well, you both are right.
2
NMe84 3 days ago +31
Yes. But Trump's war is not doing that. He's not helping these people. He doesn't even intend to and fail, he's just in this for himself.
31
MB4050 3 days ago +14
No, this is not the way. As the past month has shown, acting like this has only caused even more suffering to innocents and emboldened the Iranian regime. There's an insane uptick in pro-regime propaganda all over the internet, and many people fall for it. . The way to go should've been to welcome any Iranian refugee seeking political asylum and to make it easy for Iranians seeking to escape the regime to flee from Iran. Then, Iranian dissidents should've been harboured and armed, and in general provided with the means to achieve their goals. Intelligence efforts to penetrate into the regime's ranks and bring about its fall should've been intensified. Partial bombing campaigns, strictly limited to targeting the regime's ability to acquire nuclear weapons, such as that from June 2025, may have been conducted to keep it in bay. Major international condemnation of the regime's repression of protesters and crimes against humanity in general should've been continued and legal means of prosecution pursued. The targeted assassination of top members of the regime and other criminals could still have been conducted, but ideally through local operatives and in ways not immediately traceable to state actors. Sanctions against the regime should have been intensified, ideally putting Iran under full blockade and discouraging countries dependent on Iranian imports e.g. China to continue profiting from them. If these efforts led to nothing, a case should have been made in front of the UN security council to justify an invasion of Iran and overthrowing of the regime. Only after years of meticulous planning and convincing of other parties to get on board should such an invasion have been launched, with our without the security council's approval. This should've been carried out in strict cooperation with Iranian oppositional figures, and should've ideally been paired with a series of planned uprisings within the country, in order to demonstrate full collaboration with Iranians and a will to liberate, not occupy the country.
14
Impression-These 3 days ago +6
Are we saying any regime that executes people needs to be eradicated? I don't disagree, but there are quite a few of them out there.
6
jard22 3 days ago +20
who the hell said that lol
20
Strict-Comparison583 3 days ago +9
No, we’re not saying that.
9
CasualRickRoll 2 days ago +8
Mahsa Amini was murdered by Iranian police for refusing to wear hijab in 2022. Never forget they have been killing women for resistance long before now. 
8
CircumspectCapybara 3 days ago +232
The Islamic Listnookor Guard Corps would like to remind you that this is fake news from The Great Satan, and even if it was true, she (and those 30K other anti-regime agitators) probably deserved it, and please watch our AI slop music videos, and please simp for the Islamic Republic of Iran regime in our war against the imperialistic west (and our gulf state neighbors) and also against our own citizens.
232
km3r 3 days ago +34
They are actually all Israeli spys. And of course they support the death penalty for protesting when in the next sentence freaking out about Israel having the death penalty for terrorists who murder people.
34
Past_Wishbone5025 3 days ago +3
No, no you don't understand! This is the new regime that Trump anf Vance want to work with! Trump said himself that regime change has been accomplished and this new regime is better!
3
BliniEnjoyer 3 days ago +8
May she rest in peace :( I hope Iran gets freedom from that shithole of a government someday.
8
Sr_DingDong 3 days ago +7
Make a lego movie about *that*, asswads.
7
motherseffinjones 3 days ago +6
Damn I feel so bad for these people.
6
MealieAI 3 days ago +6
For f***'s sake.
6
shewy92 3 days ago +4
The 30k or so since Jan don't count I guess?
4
Frequently_lucky 3 days ago +4
The IRGC will probably sexually abuse her and make her life as miserable as possible before executing her, that's their standard MO, they are deeply sick people.
4
Kaihann 3 days ago +9
You mean none of the supposed 40,000 executed included a single woman?
9
FrogsJumpFromPussy 3 days ago +4
Poor girl 😔
4
rain168 3 days ago +4
What an evil regime…
4
Healthy-Amoeba2296 3 days ago +5
I've watched too many bad movies. I wonder how hard it would be to hire a mercenary army to get her out. Totally unrealistic of course.
5
AnEngineeringMind 3 days ago +3
Getting death penalty for protesting, crazy....
3
HarEr89 3 days ago +5
Well, they killed 1000s of women and children in January, shot them in the face, beat them to death, stabbed them to death etc.
5
BadHombreSinNombre 3 days ago +7
I guess the 10 or 15 thousand they shot in the street in January didn’t count as women to them?
7
Shionkron 3 days ago +14
Hahahaha. The thousands of woman the Iranian regime has killed already don’t count?!
14
Usual_Scientist1522 3 days ago +68
"Iran is just a nice country, doesnt deserve USA bombing the regime" Proceeds to execute woman "Well umm eeehh"
68
femspective 3 days ago +37
Nobody said they were nice.
37
Arthur_Edens 3 days ago +15
For real.... Just War Theory is real instructive on this conversation. - Competent Authority: Only duly constituted public authorities may wage war. (Nope, don't have that here). - Probability of success: There must be good grounds for concluding that aims of the just war are achievable. This principle emphasizes that mass violence must not be undertaken if it is unlikely to secure the just cause. (Nope, not at all). - Last resort: All non-violent options must first be exhausted before the use of force can be justified. (Nope). - Just Cause: The reason for going to war needs to be just and cannot, therefore, be solely for recapturing things taken or punishing people who have done wrong; innocent life must be in imminent danger and intervention must be to protect life. (Mmmmmmmaybe). You can admit that this war is 1/4 there, while also holding the view that the Iranian Government is monstrous.
15
Detr22 3 days ago +10
Don't worry, the US told us this is a new regime. The last one was eradicated with the bombing. Since the bombings have stopped, the US must support this new regime.
10
Definitelynotasloth 3 days ago +9
Point to me a single person in America who has said that lmao
9
Willyr0 3 days ago +22
It’s crazy how tons and tons of bombs doesn’t make a place better. How could we have known that
22
Neck-Old 3 days ago +10
Japan, Germany in the 1940s said otherwise. I think with Iran Trump is actually being too indecisive and weak. The initial day is a total failure with lack of air protection for some of the most vital assets we had in the region. Only one CSG is available during the opening days and the other one coming ensured a long deployment with a very resentful crew. I think Trump's ego is more damaging to this operation than the entire IRCG
10
PontiusPilatesss 3 days ago +21
What did Afghanistan and the 2.3 trillion dollars spent there say?
21
jamesbideaux 3 days ago +7
how many bombs were used on afghanistan?
7
Huge_JackedMann 3 days ago +5
The regime deserves it, the people don't and the bombs were dropping seem to be helping solidify regime control because people don't generally like it when you do open war crimes against them.  This was a job for the CIA, diplomacy and international unity. Not the Rapists Crusade. 
5
IClop2Fluttershy4206 3 days ago +6
if you're gonna die, take as many with you. there's a reason there's only one language bullies understand
6
TSJormungandr 3 days ago +9
Wait till you hear about our ally Saudi Arabia!
9
owen__wilsons__nose 3 days ago +3
Sick fucks
3
Fastikonio 3 days ago +8
I will bet everything I have on the fact that she was not the first one
8
DaySecure7642 3 days ago +11
Come on where are the progressive feminist groups when we need them? This is way worse than 10% difference in salary. They are executing women!
11
1911Earthling 3 days ago +9
Finally equal rights in Iran.
9
wynveen 3 days ago +26
Listnook: bUt aMeRiCa
26
adminsregarded 3 days ago +6
Absolutely sickening.
6
schtickshift 3 days ago +4
These evil and disgusting people need to be replaced and put on trial for their crimes against humanity.
4
IntelArtiGen 3 days ago +6
It's not just women btw, I recommend people check what Amnesty & OHCHR say regarding the execution of minors, because Iran does that too.
6
Spazicon 3 days ago +10
This public announcement to remind you there are no good guys in this war.
10
givin_u_the_high_hat 3 days ago +7
And these are the people Trump says are the right people to be negotiating with and the war is pretty much over. It was never about regime change or protecting the Iranian people.
7
bass248 3 days ago +7
Once the Iranian regime is out of power things will get better for the people of Iran
7
Firehead1971 3 days ago +5
You better dont want to know what they do with these women before execution.
5
Free-Initiative7508 3 days ago +4
Pretty sure execution isnt the first thing that comes to these suck fucks mind
4
CharlesForbin 3 days ago +7
>Iran to execute first woman over anti-regime protests First woman? If you're telling me that all of the 40k murdered during the protests are all men, I don't believe you. The IRGC hates women and probably blame them for the uprisings.
7
Paladin_127 3 days ago +6
“Execution” in this context implies some kind of judicial due process. The 30K+ who were previously killed were extrajudicial massacres.
6
CharlesForbin 3 days ago +3
>“Execution” in this context implies some kind of judicial due process. In a normal world, it would, but this is the IRGC and a woman.
3
Ecstatic_Wasabi_5166 3 days ago +5
Executing a woman for protesting - that's a whole new level of desperation from the regime.
5
NextGur3758 3 days ago +8
This is what listnookors support when they spread iranian regime propaganda
8
[deleted] 3 days ago +18
[deleted]
18
Haggis-in-wonderland 3 days ago +6
Ah is this Trumps "new" regime then? Sounds a lot like the old one.
6
GettinWiggyWiddit 3 days ago +14
This is who Listnook is rooting for (Iran)
14
Weary_Position_9591 3 days ago +6
F*** this regime. Glad some of it got blown to hell tbh, even if it’s only small payback for what they do.
6
SnooHedgehogs4699 3 days ago +2
Really no argument with that!
2
faggjuu 3 days ago +5
Thank good the brilliant strategists in the white house put an end to this disgusting regime...
5
ShaggyCan 3 days ago +3
Yeah totally not the first woman they've executed for this.
3
i010011010 3 days ago +3
I so badly wish 2024 had gone another way. There must be something we--the United States--could be doing for these people under competent leadership.
3
Blitzkrieger117 3 days ago +4
Why is listnook pro Iran again 🤔
4
Unkleseanny 3 days ago +3
It’s not nearly the first and it’s not nearly the first for anti regime protests.
3
BatFromAnotherWorld 3 days ago +2
This poor woman is going to be raped by every goat herder with a gun and an authority complex on her way to the gallows. It makes me f****** sick.
2
HaightnAshbury 3 days ago +4
Their meme game may be good, but their religion problems ruin it all. Boo regime.
4
QualityOverQuant 3 days ago +3
Man. This is so fucked up - excerpt from The article > Hemmati has been accused of numerous charges, including using explosives and weapons, throwing objects such as concrete blocks and bottles, and “harming stationed forces on-site,” according to a news release from the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI). The regime’s judiciary also listed “participating in protest gatherings,” “sending content with the aim of undermining security” and “chanting protest slogans” in line with “disrupting national security” and in connection with “hostile groups” as her crimes. Hemmati’s husband Mohammadreza Majid Asl was also sentenced to death, along with two other men, Behrouz Zamaninezhad and Kourosh Zamaninezhad, both of whom lived in the same apartment building as the couple
3
justaroundhere213 2 days ago +2
I’m not saying literally everything the regime says is a lie but I doubt it tbh.especially since they torture people for confessions 
2
readyforadirtnap 3 days ago +3
After the whole Sabrina Carpenter thing, aren’t we supposed to respect others culture?
3
PipChaos 3 days ago +4
And oddly “what is happening to Iranian civilians” isn’t in the list of reasons for attacking the country.
4
DistanceToEmpty 3 days ago +4
You'll notice that none of the United States' demands in the '15 Point Plan' relates to the protection or stopping the prosecution of anti-regeme protestors.
4
desertgirl89 3 days ago +5
And yet majority people on listnook side with Iran's regime and islamists.
5
East1st 3 days ago +12
It’s logical to be against the regime and against Trump’s war at the same time. Let that sink in before you reply.
12
estrea36 3 days ago +9
No one is siding with iran. Think of it this way. Eritrea has a totalitarian regime. Should we invade Eritrea? If no, does that mean you support Eritrea?
9
jtroye32 2 days ago +4
I think Trump started the war with Iran because he's jealous of their governmental practices, not because he's against them.
4
No-Celebration3097 2 days ago +3
I believe that.
3
lifesanrpg 3 days ago +6
But liberals will have you believe the Iranian regime is so peaceful.
6
Monteze 3 days ago +25
Shouldn't this strawman be in a field scaring birds?
25
_Kramerica_ 3 days ago +36
No they don’t, quit with your bullshit.
36
Cole444Train 3 days ago +6
Making stuff up is fun, isn’t it
6
EmuMan10 3 days ago +24
I don’t think that’s been the talking point ever
24
StrawHatTebo 3 days ago +14
Funny how conservatives are so tied up in their entire personalities being MAGA that they can't fathom innocent civilians not representing the beliefs of their dictatorial regime. So when we say, "Don't bomb school children." They hear, "Don't bomb the Iranian government." Now, I would prefer we don't bomb either and resolve things with peace and understanding, but I don't make the decisions here.
14
[deleted] 3 days ago +5
[deleted]
5
SteveJobsDeadBody 3 days ago +3
Man that's brutal. Here in America we're much more civilized, we don't kill women for having an opinion, we kill them for trying to get medical care when pregnant. 59 or more by current counts that have died because abortion is banned in their state to such a degree that they were unable to get care for life threatening pregnancy issues.
3
Logical-Bookkeeper77 3 days ago +2
Wait, isn’t Listnook saying how honorable and saintly Iran is? Where are all the Iranian / Chinese bots?
2
Hungry_Shake6943 3 days ago +3
Trump said these would stop
3
bigredthesnorer 3 days ago +3
Ya, Trump's triumph has introduced a kinder and gentler regime.
3
EnhancedWithAi 3 days ago +2
Ok American troops go save her, and put all that anti us / Israel morons in their place. Free Persia, I hope iran sees the light of day. F***.
2
← Back to Board