· 162 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 30, 2026 at 1:27 PM

Iran war tensions reach Paris with failed bombing attempt

Posted by sr_local


Iran war tensions reach Paris with failed bombing attempt
Brussels Signal
Iran war tensions reach Paris with failed bombing attempt
Police narrowly foiled a suspected terrorist attack in Paris early Saturday morning, amid ongoing security concerns across Europe. At around 3:25 AM, police officers from the anti-crime brigade…

🚩 Report this post

162 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
itai9997 Mar 30, 2026 +2007
The only reason it was stopped was because it took him too much time to ignite the device! It wasn't an intelligence win. It was a near miss. Sheer luck.
2007
cench Mar 30, 2026 +306
Sheer Luck Holmes, solves cases with the method of procrastination.
306
sayonaradespair Mar 30, 2026 +49
It was a near hit. It was a miss.
49
JoshShabtaiCa Mar 31, 2026 +24
It's a confusing term but it is a near miss. The idea being that it was a miss, but it was "near". So the "near" part doesn't describe the miss, but the actual incident itself. Yay English?
24
StJsub Mar 31, 2026 +3
>So the "near" part doesn't describe the miss Isn't it more that the miss was close instead of far. Like a near miss car crash is one that the two cars come really close but not quite. Where a far miss the cars are meters apart. The near part is about how close the miss was. In this case it was time instead of distance.  So, I am pretty sure the near does describe the miss. We just never say anything is 'far miss', instead we would say something like it missed by miles because it sounds nicer.
3
tofu98 Mar 30, 2026 +772
Lol dude was gonna do the attack for 600 bucks. Times are tough.
772
Rude_Worldliness_423 Mar 30, 2026 +266
Freelance work. The gig economy doesn’t always pay well.
266
arjanhier Mar 30, 2026 +75
I’m a freelancer myself (very different line of work, though), and I’m surprised they actually offered to pay with real money in stead of ‘exposure’.
75
morroalto Mar 30, 2026 +10
Well, he failed so maybe he was about to be exposed to the bomb and therefore not getting paid.
10
isthereadrwho Mar 30, 2026 +2
He's a petty drug dealer. He's more cash on the barrel kind of guy
2
onlyonequickquestion Mar 30, 2026 +61
Gonna be a new fiverr category soon enough 
61
JohnnySmithe81 Mar 30, 2026 +38
Russia and Ukraine have been hiring common criminals to carry out war acts in each others countries. If you can smuggle in the materials it's a very c**** attack.
38
loralailoralai Mar 31, 2026 +2
And Iran has been doing this in other countries too. Firebombing synagogues in Australia for instance
2
Beautiful_Finger4566 Mar 30, 2026 +3
he probably would've done it for free, but hey... $600
3
XfinityHomeWifi Mar 30, 2026 +16
Risking life in prison or execution for a full-time uber driver’s 3 day salary…
16
JorisN Mar 30, 2026 +20
(There aren’t death penalties in the EU)
20
Hufflepuffins Mar 30, 2026 +18
Execution? In France?
18
lebennaia Mar 30, 2026 +12
Capital punishment was abolished in France in 1981.
12
Church_of_Aaargh Mar 30, 2026 +2
That’s actually more frightening
2
Caesarea_G Mar 30, 2026 +746
We really need better distinction in reporting between "bombing" as in an air attack, and "bombing" as in an IED.
746
jamjerky Mar 30, 2026 +302
German has you covered "Bombardieren" as in Air attacks "Bombenanschlag" as in an IED
302
TeeDotHerder Mar 30, 2026 +145
In German the same word could be extended to tell you the time of day and the type of plane or backpack used. Got to love the precision lol.
145
CatolicQuotes Mar 30, 2026 +147
> "We caught the murderer (Attentäter)!" > "What?," asked the chief. > "Lattengitterkotterbeutelrattenattentäter" answered the warrior. > "Who? The murderer that was in the cage of opossums with wooden slats?" the chief of the Hottentots asked. > "Yes," answers the native with great difficulty. "Hottentottenstottertrottelmutteratentäter (murderer of the Hottentot mother who had a slow and stuttering child)." > "Ah," the chief says, "you could have said from the start that you had caught the Hottentottenstottertrottelmutterbeutelrattenlattengitterkotterattentäter!"
147
SauceBoss8472 Mar 30, 2026 +26
This feels straight out of a BoJack Horseman episode.
26
Reasonable-Gas5625 Mar 30, 2026 +12
I'm so happy for the few that are about to discover this gem here about Barbara's rubharb barbarian bar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG62zay3kck Look up Bodo Wartke's version too.
12
jamjerky Mar 30, 2026 +12
True: Morgenbombardierung and Wanderucksackbombenanschlag
12
DirkDayZSA Mar 30, 2026 +13
But then the word we use for running someone/something over (umfahren) is the exact same one we would use for driving around someone/something (umfahren). Wahrlich die beste Sprache.
13
Italian_warehouse Mar 30, 2026 +13
Ah yes the Bombardierenmorgenluftwaffen.
13
BlipBlapBloppityBoop Mar 30, 2026 +4
The composability of the German language is really really cool to me.
4
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 +2
[deleted]
2
Zarainia Mar 30, 2026 +4
It's not all that exotic. You can say similar things in English, just with some additional spaces and/or hyphens (because we never came up with a convention).
4
Best_Pseudonym Mar 30, 2026 +12
What about an IED strapped to a drone?
12
Caesarea_G Mar 30, 2026 +7
OWA, UCAV, or LM --> air attack. Quadcopter --> IED?
7
WhaleMeatFantasy Mar 30, 2026 +26
Because you thought this might have been about an airstrike? (Oh, and there’s your word.)
26
Beautiful_Finger4566 Mar 30, 2026 +5
I feel like air attacks are "air strikes" "bombing" from planes hasn't been commonplace in a few decades now, due to drone strikes
5
SpiritedCatch1 Mar 30, 2026 +82
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2026/03/28/french-police-foil-bomb-attack-in-paris-outside-bank-of-america-building_6751897_7.html Here's a more reliable source
82
Dookie120 Mar 30, 2026 +166
Enticing local small time criminals. Same method as russia.
166
moonmelonade Mar 30, 2026 +59
Iran uses this method too. E.g. last year they paid local petty criminals in Australia to do a bunch of attacks (mostly arson & vandalism) targeting Jewish places.
59
Dangerous-Sport-2347 Mar 30, 2026 +35
Might very well be russia, since it is unknown who funded the attack and there is no special reason to suspect Iran here other than the current "tensions".
35
Dookie120 Mar 30, 2026 +5
Good point.
5
pittguy578 Mar 30, 2026 +67
Why ? France has stayed out of it ? Is Iran looking to have entirety of nato involved ?
67
Hay_Fever_at_3_AM Mar 30, 2026 +30
France has allowed airbases to be used as long as they're not being used for active bombing, but that still indicates that logistics and support are allowed and that's... kind of a big part of a war effort 
30
loralailoralai Mar 31, 2026 +4
Iran has been doing this for a while. Australia has stayed out of it too and Iran organised local criminals to firebomb synagogues in Australia in 2024. Other middle eastern countries have stayed out of the current war yet they’re being hit with Iranian missiles too. Nobody is getting a pass.
4
Totoques22 Mar 31, 2026 +2
Terrorist state doing terrorism This isn’t the first time and it won’t be the last
2
SteakHoagie666 Mar 30, 2026 +2
No, but someone else would love that.
2
IranianLawyer Mar 30, 2026 +108
As usual, it’s non-Iranians doing the bidding of the Islamic Republic. In this case, Sengalese. If you go to any of the protests supporting Khamenei or the Islamic Republic, you’ll notice an absence of any actual Iranians. It’s all Arabs, Pakistanis, Bengalis, and North African Muslims.
108
sewankambo Mar 30, 2026 +83
Iran is absolutely stupid if they think this strategy works. Keep Israel and the US isolated. Involving others is bad news for them
83
tacotickles Mar 30, 2026 +31
Decentralized leadership has pros and cons. This is a potential con
31
scrambledhelix Mar 30, 2026 +37
They have no leadership at the moment, what we're seeing is probably their standing orders. They were always expecting to fight the world.
37
namitynamenamey Mar 30, 2026 +7
They are stupid, they always do stupid things like these. The only reason they are not the stupidest side on this war is Trump being literally mentally incompetent.
7
AprilsMostAmazing Mar 30, 2026 +161
This is a very dumb move and the government of Iran needs to counter this both publicly and behind the scenes if they are going to survive. French have been the most critical people of this war
161
Tomboolla Mar 30, 2026 +203
>government of Iran needs to counter this both publicly and behind the scenes Counter? They are behind this, actively orchestrating/encouraging these attacks. There have been multiple spoiled attacks in the past years with direct ties to Iran.
203
Pope-Muffins Mar 30, 2026 -21
>Counter? They are behind this Ah yes, Iran would send terrorist to attack France, a country who has openly been against supporting the US's offensives The idea of independent actors seems to not exists
-21
WolfySpice Mar 30, 2026 +92
Mate, just last year Australia kicked out the Iranian ambassador over terror attacks orchestrated by Iran on Australian soil. Waging war this way is the IRGC MO. You're not just naive, but blatantly wrong.
92
topyTheorist Mar 30, 2026 +112
They did fire drones at Oman which tried to stop the war at all costs.
112
NJDevil69 Mar 30, 2026 +60
I suggest you learn about the [Charlie Hebdo attack](https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-charlie-hebdo-attack-and-the-war-within-global-jihad/). It’s a textbook example of radicalized Islamists carrying out violent attacks. The attacks are based on common sentiments pushed within their extreme communities. To date, there have been three significant attacks like this. A truck being driven into a crowd in California, the failed explosive at the NYC protest, and this failed attempt in France. The common thread between these attacks is the each attacker has professed their religiously, extreme views to the public as justification for their attack.
60
abellapa Mar 30, 2026 +9
Iran literally attacked almost everyone in the Middle East even though they were neutral Also Iran chain it command is fucked up so it might have genuily been a rouge ircc unit But Thats still Iran fault
9
fleemfleemfleemfleem Mar 30, 2026 +2
As with attacking neighboring countries the gamble is that the attacks will make more people oppose the war and pressure the US to end it. The same people could just start blaming Iran though and join in, which is while it's a gamble. I guess if you only have one button to press...
2
Own_Worldliness_9297 Mar 30, 2026 +25
cute take. Iranian government is orchesterating this
25
Ozyy1 Mar 30, 2026 +39
The Islamic Republic probably ordered the attack, why would they counter it?
39
dggbrl Mar 30, 2026 +2
Iran would not counter it like make the attacks stop, but counter it like spread propaganda that it is not them. "Oh but we didn't do it, it don't make sense it will prompt NATO into supporting US and Israel. How could we do a terror attack, it's not like we've just done it last year with Australia. Oh and btw we are already attacking every Gulf states around us, even Turkey a NATO country but we totally didn't do it, it must be the work of the US." Then people like u/Rescuepets777 would come to their rescue and defend them for free.
2
Rescuepets777 Mar 30, 2026 +4
Why would they order it? To prompt NATO into supporting the U.S. and Israel against them? That makes no sense.
4
greenskinmarch Mar 30, 2026 +29
> Why would they order it? Because they think scaring people will make them think twice about supporting a war on Iran. Iran has a long history of funding terrorism for this purpose (Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis).
29
Mac3030 Mar 30, 2026 +25
So can you explain why they wouldn’t? They’ve killed at least 7,000 of their own people this year and have launched strikes against 9 Gulf States. It’s not conjecture that some listnookors are just automatically assuming it’s Iran. It’s literally coming directly from French authorities who believe there is a link to Iran due to the similarities in other recent attacks.
25
Draftytap334 Mar 30, 2026 +5
But it makes sense when they shoot their own anti regime citizens. Yeahhh......
5
Bitter_Tea442 Mar 30, 2026 +17
Imagine defending the Iranian government who has been exporting terror attacks for 45 years, including this one.
17
Dmsc18 Mar 30, 2026 +6
Dude are you joking? You think the largest, most powerful terrorist organization in the world is going to do that? Stop legitimizing them by saying stuff like this
6
CircumspectCapybara Mar 30, 2026 +396
That's a great way to galvanize France (and Europe) *against* Iran and end up with a gulf-war style coalition or NATO Article 5 war against Iran. The same way Iran's attacking the gulf states have pushed them from the sidelines to now urging the US toto neutralize Iran and even giving them base access and overflight permissions (previously US strikes in Epic Fury were all carrier based because the gulf states didn't permit use of their airfields or airspace. until Iran blew up their oil fields and airports and hotels that is). Or Iran attacking UK bases pushed them from the sidelines to granting the US base access and overflight. You already have the UN Security Council demanding Iran cease its attacks on the gulf states. How often do you get Russia and China to agree with the US and Israel? You already have a joint statement by a ton of EU member states committing to ensure security in the gulf. Yet Iran thinks it's a good idea to attack French and UK territory, who would otherwise rather not join in on the US' adventures and would rather wait to see which way the wind blows before decisively committing themselves. Iran would do well to make friends and not enemies of every possible neutral third party.
396
HTML_Novice Mar 30, 2026 +71
Just have Iran bot farms spam Listnook with no true Scotsman about the bombings not being from Iran, and instead is a mossad agent or some nonsense and Listnook will eat it up. Oh see? Another comment is already doing it below me lol
71
CircumspectCapybara Mar 30, 2026 +8
Yeah man I heard Trump said he was offered the position of the Supreme Leader of Iran. Maybe he took it, and he's actually the one running Iran, and ordering the IRGC terrorist attacks! *\*taps forehead\**
8
theflyingspaghetti Mar 30, 2026 +132
"The 9/11 terrorist attacks are a great way to galvanize the United States (and NATO) *against* the Taliban and end up in a gulf-war style coalition." That's the plan. Iran cannot win in a conventional fight, they're only path is to cause enough pain to their adversaries that they decide it's not worth it. The best way to do that is to lure them into a "boots on the ground" situation, then in a few(or many) years the political appetite will have so soured on Iran that voters will demand a withdrawal, allowing Iran to do anything they want.
132
klingma Mar 30, 2026 +82
There's no way this strategy ends well with Iran, though. They're a sovereign nation with defined borders, clear power structure, and a functional government - unlike a terrorists group that are more nebulous & mobile. If Iran whips up a coalition against them they will lose, this is a massive tactical blunder on their part. The other nations dragged in won't be keen on stopping until the threat in Iran is neutralized which essentially means the Iranian government and military apparatus.  The Strait of Hormuz strategy was the play...blindly lashing out against other non-combatant countries is not. 
82
niz_loc Mar 30, 2026 +54
This... No offense to the comment above, but Iran gains nothing in a drawn out war with the US and world in general. Iran is currently still selling oil via the straight but vastly less than normal. They need money like anyone else does. They're also being massively bombed round the clock and haven't shown the ability to stop that. I'm not at all suggesting Israel / US is "winning" as much as pointing out to listnook that Iran is losing as much as everyone else.
54
Living_Cash1037 Mar 30, 2026 +35
Also they just got done killing 30,000 of their own people. Im sure a good chunk of the populace has no loyalties to the IRGC either...
35
CircumspectCapybara Mar 30, 2026 +154
Idk man 9/11 seemed like a great tactical victory but a terrible strategic blunder for Al Qaeda and UBL long-term, on terms with Pearl Harbor in that it galvanized a whole nation into committing itself decisively to destroying them. The US didn't forget that grudge and over the course of a decade hunted down most of Al Qaeda and eventually UBL himself, setting the Middle East on fire along the way. Seems like Al Qaeda miscalculated US resolve and willingness to rain bombs on their enemies (and cause a whole lot of collateral damage along the way) if you really enrage them. If you leave em alone, the people won't have a stomach for war. If you unite them against a common enemy, they will happily pour trillions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of bombs into making your life miserable.
154
mr_positron Mar 30, 2026 +17
They are religious fanatics who see this conflict as extending well past their time on earth. Westerners, including their governments, have frequently/always made the mistake of assuming they are not really like that, but the reality is that they are.
17
wannabesaddoc Mar 30, 2026 +72
I would argue that 20 years later UBL is dead, sure, but the US got trillions into debt, saw its governemnt turn into a security obsessed behemot, lost many lives and lost focus of its main strategic interests. It was a phyrric victory for the west at best
72
niz_loc Mar 30, 2026 +106
Now look at it from AQs standpoint. They had a good run of major attacks against the US, and were rock stars in the jihad world. After 9/11, the bulk of them were killed, they lost funding and influence to ISIS (a rival). The Saudi govt is still in power (Bin Ladens main target), and the US massively expanded its footprint into the middle east. Israel is not only stronger today, but most of the region has somewhat normalized relations with them. You can absolutely argue the US spent trillions to gain little, and far too many people killed and hurt. But AQ lost badly. Their entire goal was to get the US out of the middle east so that they could overthrow the Saudi family and establish a caliphate (a la ISIS), and to jump from that to finally getting rid of Israel and America's support for it. They got nothing that they wanted.
106
blindsdog Mar 30, 2026 +45
That’s a fine outcome for terrorists who only care about weakening the West but it wasn’t a good outcome for the states involved and it won’t be for Iran. Especially the leaders who in this scenario are baiting the West into an involved invasion.
45
nonpuissant Mar 30, 2026 +11
>That’s a fine outcome for terrorists who only care about weakening the West   fwiw that could also describe Iran's government. It's not like they care about/prioritize the well-being of their own people. 
11
Hautamaki Mar 30, 2026 +3
Yes but they intend to stay in power. Any outcome that involves them losing power is a loss from their perspective, regardless of the fact that it could also be a loss for their enemies.
3
Pruzter Mar 30, 2026 +22
The US has the strongest grip over the Middle East that it has ever had. Iran is the last hold out, every other enemy has either fallen or been neutralized as a serious threat. After Iran falls, US dominance of the Middle East will be final. From this perspective, yeah the war on terror actually looks like a massive strategic win for the US. The US is wealthier and more dominant than ever before. If you think the national debt is a sign of failure, you don’t understand what capital actually is at the end of the day.
22
Hautamaki Mar 30, 2026 +5
Yeah I forget which economist said it but they said something to the effect of "Debt means I have your actual stuff, and you have numbers on a piece of paper somewhere".
5
xdvesper Mar 30, 2026 +12
I think like with vaccines people just forget the severity of the original threat. They had escalated from bombing the USS Cole to 9/11 in a short period of time, demonstrating their global reach and coordination. They had an alliance with Jemaah Islamiah (a South East Asian terrorist group). They had anthrax labs in Afghanistan. The plot for massive bomb attack on Singapore was foiled in late 2001 immediately after 9/11, but the Bali Bombing attack was not, killing 202 people, mainly targeting Westeners. It was only by cooperation by all countries (Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand) that the Singapore bomb plot was foiled. Malaysia elected to incarcerate their 9/11 linked terrorist locally and the US were happy enough with that outcome (usually they get tortured in a CIA black site before ending up in Guantanamo Bay). Saudi Arabia provided a lot of the initial surveillance which led to tracing down all the 9/11 conspirators leading to them beig exposed in the AQ / JI summit in Malaysia. Afghanistan of all countries chose to shelter AQ so they made it their headquarters. If there was a huge anthrax attack on the London Underground or some other dense city center we would be angry that our leaders didn't act sooner.
12
BRUTAL_ANAL_SMASHING Mar 30, 2026 +14
That debt doesn’t matter to the county.. They’re positioned as the world police at this point.  That debt will never be called on, it’s the cost of the military giant they became.  It’s the big stick diplomacy in action.    Rosevelt started that push with us, and it’s been the backbone of what holds our economy up post WWs. We moved from the gold standard and the only real backing to the USD was military might and the promise of the county not failing.. due to a strong military.  POTUS is just a loud one right now.  He’s using the stick and yelling while doing it.   I mean, this Iran stuff has been what 40+ years on going now? I have Navy vets from the 80/90s telling me that Iran always ran fast ships across their paths and x y and z during their days serving and going to the Gulf. Pretty much what I’m saying is it isn’t about the “victories” it’s for the agenda.  It’s been brewing for a long time, and it’s the funnel for the war machine.  It gets the money flowing since we’re not backed by gold, we’re backed by our actions now..  Honestly, it’s terrible.  That’s the world we live in now though! 
14
Capable_Site_2891 Mar 30, 2026 +3
Yeah, Osama bin laden achieved everything he was after.
3
sweetperdition Mar 30, 2026 +4
Exactly what I’ve been saying. Basically nobody wants to get involved, but if you kill civilians they will, and then there’s no possible win condition. Alternatively, keep f****** the economy, with no dead civilians people will get angry enough at the aggressors that they’ll pull out, regime survives. Worst thing in the woooorld they could do, would be drag the other middle powers in, when they clearly do not want to.
4
Crudstaceous Mar 30, 2026 +8
This is such a hilariously bad take. Iran's government (in its current state) would not survive a long US occupation. There is no serious strategy to encourage a ground invasion because it represents an extremely bad outcome for Iran that current military and civilian leadership would likely not survive.
8
sw337 Mar 30, 2026 +6
The Taliban didn’t attack the USA they were harboring the people who did. Massive difference.
6
ZuAusHierDa Mar 30, 2026 +3
And yet the war in Afghanistan had the support of the security council, including Russia and China.
3
Pruzter Mar 30, 2026 +6
That won’t work though, because instead they are just going to prove to the neutral countries that an Islamic republic led Iran is too dangerous. It’s like if you are in school and two kids you only vaguely know are fighting each other. You don’t really care too much, as neither is your best friend or mortal enemy. Suddenly, one of them runs up to you and punches you in the face. Are you going to stay neutral now?
6
razzmanfire Mar 30, 2026 +6
"Yes the best way to win is to tire them out from ending so many of us for so long that they are no longer interested after ending everyone(mostly) responsible and taking over the country for a decade+" You guys just genuinely say shit from the comfort of your home and its nauseating.... real humans will die idiot.
6
tweda4 Mar 30, 2026 +19
??? This is a hypothetical explanation of Iran's military actions. They're not advocating, they're just explaining Iran's thought process in conducting these actions.
19
niz_loc Mar 30, 2026 +13
I agree with this, but it's also ridiculous. Not your comment here but listnook arguing that Iran is playing a smart long game. Iran's official statements should be viewed with as much eye rolling as Trumps BS. Tough talking hardliners on TV where the reality on the ground is different. As of now nobody has opened the Straight so Iran still has a massive amount of influence. At the same time they are being openly bombed round the clock and can't stop that from happening. There's been no shortage of comments on here the past few weeks about Israel running g out of interceptor missiles, and that's very fair. I've seen very few mentioning Iran will also have logistic problems from shooting so many missiles, as well as having their stock and launch sites bombed for several weeks. Disclaimer that I'm not writing this "yelling at you". Just pointing out this place has come up with some ... interesting takes the past few weeks that don't make a lot of sense, and plenty have been convinced it's "obvious".
13
Sweaty_Librarian_293 Mar 30, 2026 +93
Lol did you read the article. It was some druggie Senagelese man trying to light gas on fire. Nothing links this to Iran other than the article just speculating. Use your f****** brain. This wasn’t Iran dragging anyone into the war although I know you are licking your lips at the thought. Wonder if you are signed up to fight p****. 
93
XeoKnight Mar 30, 2026 +59
Except the French interior minister saying so? And the minor in question supposedly being paid by foreign actors to do it? Seems far fetched but the article isn’t making shit up.
59
Hex65 Mar 30, 2026 +16
Bots are out to misguide people. It is crazy how that comment is at the top. Listnook is hard lobbying for USandI
16
ConflictExtreme1540 Mar 30, 2026 +4
Lol this is what you get when you try and justify or defend Iran. So many people like you being like "umm actually why is the terrorist state of Iran threatening to bomb all their neighbors and peaceful countries that have nothing to do with this war, don't they know trump bad??" Y'all are just useful idiots for iran
4
Tradtrade Mar 30, 2026 +2
False flag?
2
Starmoses Mar 30, 2026 +21
France and the EU are just gonna pretend that didn't happen and wait til Iran actually kills French citizens. Then they'll send a strongly worded letter.
21
reactor4 Mar 30, 2026 +4
idiots
4
BloodSteyn Mar 30, 2026 +116
Yeah, unless Iran openly claims an attack, everything will be a false flag in my book until proven otherwise. Seen this movie before.
116
Reasonable_Main2509 Mar 30, 2026 +176
I think the more prudent approach is to not assume anything until the facts are released. Immediately assuming a false flag isn’t any better than automatically assuming Iran is behind the attack.
176
redpoemage Mar 30, 2026 +76
Yep, people too often think their contrarianism is skepticism.
76
NumeralJoker Mar 30, 2026 +28
C**** karma farming is all it is.
28
Filthyquak Mar 30, 2026 +3
Refreshing to see a voice of reason
3
ADP_God Mar 30, 2026 +35
Do you think there are more false flag attacks than real ones?
35
Bitter_Tea442 Mar 30, 2026 +28
They are just trying to keep their worldview intact. It is a psychological defense mechanism to avoid realizing they are supporting bad people.
28
Weebus Mar 30, 2026 +52
They have openly made claimed they'd be activating proxy groups in the West. MI5 documented numerous attempts by IRGC affiliated groups to commit terror attacks in the UK long before this war started.
52
RazzleLikesCandy Mar 30, 2026 +39
Because terrorists would never ever commit terrorist acts /s
39
klingma Mar 30, 2026 +65
We're in solidarity brother! I too deny everything unless it's stated verbatim from a country that's historically denied funding proxies & terrorists to stage attacks on other countries. It's nonsense! It's a false flag and not at all another funded proxy or terrorist attack from Iran.  Stand strong brother! Your conviction to deny, despite it making you look really really stupid, is astounding and inspirational! 
65
soupdawg Mar 30, 2026 +6
What if they false flag the false flag?
6
renok2504 Mar 30, 2026 +7
And why would they claim it? The whole reason they launched attacks from Hezbollah/Iraq militias/Houthies is because it's very east to deny their part in it, and they've done so for decades
7
Efficient_Basis_2139 Mar 30, 2026 +7
I guess the anti-vax, flat Earth types of people like you must have to state opinion on everything, regardless of how stupid, huh?
7
Pretendant Mar 30, 2026 +18
If you don't question this type of incident in this tense international context you're actually closer to flat earthers, who just believe any info they see
18
Efficient_Basis_2139 Mar 30, 2026 +17
Flat Earther's categorically do not believe what they see. We can state this by their ignorance of science and facts.  Regardless, its fine to go "US bad" but Iran employ child soldiers, massacred 35K of their own citizens to cling to power, attacked neutral countries (and one ally) and have funded and supported literal terrorist networks for decades killing untold people. Currently, they are attempting to hold the entire planet hostage so they can cling on to power and subjugated their population. They aren't the good guys here. And to ignore *all of these facts* and peddle bullshit conspiracy theories just because "America bad" like the initial poster did makes them either an absolute idiot or a troll.  *"Question things"* is fine. *"Unless Iran claim the attack i believe its a false flag"*, is categorically wrong, and stupid.
17
rossloderso Mar 30, 2026 -5
What would Iran gain from attacking France?
-5
Throwredditaway2019 Mar 30, 2026 +10
I mean they have been funding terrorist groups for 47 years. They have likely dropped the leash on some of them, and they are doing what they want with what they have. Was IRGC directly involved, or was it one of the proxies. Lots of questions.
10
Heathcliff511 Mar 30, 2026 +10
What did they gain from attacking the neutral gulf states?
10
OilySoleTickler Mar 30, 2026 +8
Smart iran. So smart. Europe refuses to help Trump. Better give them a good reason to help Trump annihilate you. Iran is like a listnookor acting smart 😂
8
Hypnoti_q Mar 30, 2026 +6
Keep allowing iran to get more confident
6
NY_Knux Mar 30, 2026 +2
Seems similar to the Oslo attack last month. 3 perpetrators, just like this.
2
fitzgoldy Mar 31, 2026 +2
Not so much 'iran war tension's', more Iran doing Iran things in funding terrorism around Europe.
2
TheDungen Mar 31, 2026 +2
I really wish they stopped targetting us for the crapbthe US does.
2
MourningRIF Mar 30, 2026 +4
God.. is everyone stupid? Iran had the undeserved benefit of the doubt because of our stupid actions... But no... Iran really does want to get attack by every country at once.
4
HokayeZeZ Mar 31, 2026 +3
Wonder how many of these we will see popping up as false flags to bait NATO into the Iran War. It would be ridiculously stupid for Iran to provoke NATO countries when they already have the US and Israel on their heels.
3
Motor_Chard_7230 Mar 30, 2026 +11
You read this headline and wonder what new insanity Trump has started.
11
PracticalYellow3 Mar 30, 2026 +64
Yes because there were no Iranian-sponsored bombings in Paris before Trump.  See how ridiculous you sound?
64
ADP_God Mar 30, 2026 +11
Iran has been planting bombs overseas since long before Trump...
11
IntrepidOption31415 Mar 30, 2026 +16
Only about 32 months trump left.  How much worse can it really get from here? (/s because this is listnook) 
16
HiImDan Mar 30, 2026 +10
and then how does the next president get us out of it? assuming we even elect someone that tries
10
BasicMatter7339 Mar 30, 2026 -3
If trump stays alive for the next 32 months then im certain he wont leave willingly from the office
-3
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 +4
[deleted]
4
dansdansy Mar 30, 2026 +3
Russia has been doing this for years and now Iran is likely doing the same. The suspect said they were recruited online and were promised payment for the attack, we've seen dozens of stories of the same thing happening all over Europe connected to the GRU.
3
glumjonsnow Mar 30, 2026 +2
yeah, this article is f****** nuts. the US is certainly doing plenty of shit right now but they're not the scapegoat for all the world's evil. like someone bumped into my yesterday and i dropped a coffee. were they an iranian proxy?????????? please tell me!
2
Due-Department-8906 Mar 30, 2026 +3
Oh my God, they've even taken up petty attacks. This is bad bad
3
TopChard1274 Mar 30, 2026 +3
Very dumb move, France is one of the very few neutral "friends* that Iran still has rn
3
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 -4
[deleted]
-4
nunii Mar 30, 2026 +13
Haha I was waiting for this dumb comment to show up …. You didn’t disappoint
13
Polyanalyne Mar 30, 2026 -20
So um, do we know who's the bomber? CIA/Mossad agents?
-20
JohnGabin Mar 30, 2026 +15
Young guys hired on internet for a couple of bucks. They were filming themself to give a proof. The « bomb » was really weak and badly built. A kind of Molotov cocktail
15
Rsantana02 Mar 30, 2026 +11
More like IRGC terrorists.
11
Foreign-Chocolate86 Mar 30, 2026 -38
For those that did not bother to read the article.  Person attempted to bomb the Bank of America branch in Paris. This was targeted at US interest, not French. Iran threatened they were going to do this over a week ago.  https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/03/23/iran-war-tensions-build-as-conflict-enters-its-fourth-week.html
-38
VetinariTheLord Mar 30, 2026 +246
Bombing anything in Paris is attacking the French interests...
246
yoogle1 Mar 30, 2026 +55
Yeah lol what a way to phrase that
55
Dancing_Anatolia Mar 30, 2026 +4
When I spray painted the Olive Garden in Hoboken, New Jersery I really *stuck it* to the Italian government over their anti-LGBTQ legislation.
4
ReceptionNo67 Mar 30, 2026 +63
Was it staffed exclusively by Americans?
63
lilovia16 Mar 30, 2026 +5
Still in Paris.
5
Best_Change4155 Mar 30, 2026 +10
The building, also American.
10
ADP_God Mar 30, 2026 +9
The bricks. American.
9
Public-Eagle6992 Mar 30, 2026 +7
Paris. American
7
bliss19 Mar 30, 2026 +12
That’s like saying I’m going to hit only American made cars while driving down the highway… The mental gymnastics are insane
12
klingma Mar 30, 2026 +29
A bombing on French soil, that would have hurt French citizens, and cost French money to repair the damage. Yeah, the delineation of it being a Bank of America really matters here. 
29
Delann Mar 30, 2026 +39
It's a bombing attempt, jackass. What, are they gonna check the citizenship of everyone there and cordon it off before detonation? And even if the aim was to strike at US interests, this is civilian infrastructure on foreign soil. Its still a terror attack with no military aim beyond that.
39
florodude Mar 30, 2026 +35
Not that I'd consider this war sane by any means... But if this was somebody working on behalf of Iran's official interests and not just a "vigilante", what the f*** are they thinking? Do they think France will go "Hey, because you only bombed American assets, it's probably not that big of a deal."
35
dansdansy Mar 30, 2026 +12
The article says they were recruited on social media and were offered payment for proof of the attack-which was why they had a guy videoing. Russia pulled this a lot and now looks like Iran is doing the same.
12
Paraparo Mar 30, 2026 +21
... I feel awful for saying this, but this gives huge South Park "What do you mean the Federal Express isn't a part of the government" vibes. Not to make light of a terror attack but, do people really not look deeper than the name to not realize the US government doesn't literally run that bank, especially not some random European branch. I work with a bank, if it's anything like mine, they're probably completely isolated, I know mine has entirely separate systems by country, different personnel too.
21
ADP_God Mar 30, 2026 +7
This kind of analysis is terrible. This is like the people who said 'attacking the ambulances in England wasn't a terror attack on the English because the service was run by Jews'. It services the country it is in, it's run by the people from that country.
7
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 +5
[removed]
5
Foreign-Chocolate86 Mar 30, 2026 +3
This is what Iran has said, that they would target American financial institutions abroad. 
3
TinyConfection7049 Mar 30, 2026 +1
3:25 am?! 
1
Zib559 Mar 30, 2026 +1
Can of worms: opened.
1
← Back to Board