ListNook

yosisoy Apr 2, 2026 +514

"The Pasteur Institute in Iran has previously been the subject of scrutiny over the possibility of its facilities being misused to produce biological weapons. In 2007, the Japanese government listed it as an “entity of concern” for biological and chemical weapons proliferation, and in 2008 Britain listed the centre as a potential risk for procurement related to weapons of mass destruction" Hmmph

514

ShoughThePainAway Apr 2, 2026 +187

The Japanese and British are being controlled by Putin. /s

187

Stunning_Mast2001 Apr 2, 2026 -115

20 year old reports aren’t compelling

-115

alterom Apr 2, 2026 +83

>20 year old reports aren’t compelling Because surely in the past 20 years Iran's relationship with the world at large got more friendlier, right?

83

yosisoy Apr 2, 2026 +112

IRGC's claims aren't compelling either

112

ShoughThePainAway Apr 2, 2026 +25

Cool, I have a less than 1 day old report that the US thought that those were astute observations.

25

OtheDreamer Apr 2, 2026 +55

Things that make you go "that's kind of weird innit?"

55

call-the-wizards Apr 2, 2026 +22

Iranians have known it's *primarily* a biological research weapons center for years. If anyone says it's being used for medical research, ask them to produce a single example of a drug or vaccine produced there. During covid Iran "produced" a "local" vaccine (not at Pasteur, though) which was actually just an attempted copy of sinovac which was even less effective.

22

flatandroid Apr 2, 2026 +5

Pasteurs aren’t usually vax manufacturers though. They are surveillance centers and lab science training facilities.

5

impthetarg Apr 3, 2026

By that same logic, please produce instances of Iran using biological weapons

0

call-the-wizards Apr 3, 2026 +5

[https://thebulletin.org/2026/04/what-should-be-done-about-irans-potential-secret-chemical-and-biological-weapons-programs/](https://thebulletin.org/2026/04/what-should-be-done-about-irans-potential-secret-chemical-and-biological-weapons-programs/) And for info on who this is: The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists is a nuclear nonproliferation org, and they have many articles critical of the USA's nuclear program. They're the people who set the infamous "doomsday clock" every year. >The *Bulletin* began as an emergency action, created by scientists who saw an immediate need for a public reckoning in the aftermath of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These scientists anticipated that the atom bomb would be “only the first of many dangerous presents from the Pandora’s Box of modern science.” They were all too correct. The *Bulletin* is an independent, nonprofit 501 (c) (3) organization that pursues its goals through media products, starting in 1945 as a mimeographed newsletter, then a magazine, now as an online publication.

5

Medical_Track_790 Apr 2, 2026 +117

>The Pasteur Institute in Iran has previously been the subject of scrutiny over the possibility of its facilities being misused to produce biological weapons Yeah, I mean this is why no one in the US would have any issue with the University of Nebraska getting bombed by Iran, for example, since it houses the collaboration with the Department of War on biological weapons research in the US. >As a University Affiliated Research Center designated by the U.S. Department of War (DOW), NSRI delivers mission-essential solutions and capabilities that are developed in collaboration with DOW end users to counter complex and emerging chemical and biological threats. https://nsri.nebraska.edu/innovative-capabilities/chemical-biological-threat-detection-countermeasure-development Sorry cornhuskers, you're a legitimate target now, the research is mission-essential for the war

117

Dongsquad420Loki Apr 2, 2026 +71

It is q legitimate target yes, one just has to take proportionality into effect like always, but iran doesn't exactly have missiles to hit the US mainland which makes it purely academic. I mean there are many targets in the US that are legitimate. Factories producing weapons, shipyards, they could strike the Whitehouse if they had the capabilities to

71

Gramscifi Apr 2, 2026 -55

None of these strikes in Iran are on "legitimate targets" since this is a naked war of aggression intended to destroy the Iranian state and reduce the country to a state of disorder and chaos. None of this should be accepted or deemed reasonable. Everyone has lost their f****** minds.

-55

Dauntless_Idiot Apr 2, 2026 +38

When Iran launched an armed attack to seize a US civilian tanker in February, this became an 'armed conflict' which is what international law uses as a war even if parties claim its not. International law recognizes Iran as the aggressor. The US retaliated in an existing and current armed conflict. You have to actually read international law instead of just assuming it backs up whatever you think. You clearly haven't because you've made multiple errors in a single paragraph.

38

hoodhelmut Apr 2, 2026 +12

Why is it then, that the united states proclaimed that the start of the war was a pre retaliatory strike against iran because israel would have attacked iran, which in return would have attacked us bases. Why this whole bullshitting around instead of clear and precise reasoning.

12

Teripid Apr 3, 2026 -1

Operation Midnight Hammer was June 21–22, 2025. Was that one just for funzies and not the start of "armed conflict"? I swear people on Listnook have the shortest memories imaginable and US policy goals and justifications change daily. Imagine if Iran had preemptively struck US targets while negotiations were ongoing... Guess we're just going to have to pay the toddler tax on oil for.. an indeterminate amount of time.

-1

Dauntless_Idiot Apr 3, 2026 +4

Your short memory forgot about the ceasefire in 2025 to denote the end of the armed conflict. From the international law perspective, the current armed conflict starts February 3rd with the armed attack to seize the US civilian tanker. Negotiations started February 6th where[ Iran was "aiming to delay the possibility of a US attack,". ](https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2026/02/08/iran-nuclear-talks-fragile-resumption-of-discussions-between-washington-and-tehran_6750267_4.html) On February 26th, the third round of negotiations to prevent war failed with nothing concrete agreed upon after 3 rounds. Looks like you forgot that the US negotiation team left Geneva so they weren't even in the same city, that's not ongoing negotiations. Failed negotiations to prevent strikes lead to the start of strikes in February. Iran, US or other perspectives on this might differ from international law. International law on armed conflicts was created to define a middle ground when narratives don't agree. 'Armed conflict' was used by international law to prevent parties from claiming their war, wasn't a real war because of "(insert reasons)."

4

Totoques22 Apr 3, 2026 +1

Lmao lots of cope and bullshit here Almost all the targets are legitimate and so is this war and destroying the Islamic state of Iran is a good thing

1

Dongsquad420Loki Apr 2, 2026 +9

Wgat yoy say is irrelevant to the legality if the strikes. The right to war and the right if conduct in war are completely different and one doesn't influence the other. No idea why you even felt the need to comment that

9

Gramscifi Apr 2, 2026 -7

Actually, attacking civillian targets is always a war crime under international law. The legality just doesn't f****** matter because there is no one to enforce it on the US. No idea why you even felt the need to drool near my comment.

-7

Dongsquad420Loki Apr 3, 2026 +3

That is untrue under international law, why do you state things you clearly dont know

3

PissOnYourParade Apr 2, 2026 -14

Well, one Orange Senior Citizen has for sure lost his mind. But enough people see the opportunity for grift that they join in.

-14

PissOnYourParade Apr 2, 2026 +37

If there was a war, and someone was bombing, yeah, that's totally a legitimate target. Also, all of our interstate bridges (the interstate was designed first to transport war material. It's a happy side effect that it helps people get around). Tunnels, bridges, research institutes (which unhappily are embedded in college campuses). War is hell. Well, what's that saying? Hell is hell, war is worse? That's why you don't just go and start one because… vibes? Such a f****** stupid timeline. But to the case at hand, this is a legitimate target. Although even the concept is dumb. Anything that can power the economy can power the war economy. This is why in WWII, we just f****** raised whole industrial districts to the ground (and often the cities next to them). As long as you have a shed and a pickup truck, you can build and launch Shaheeds.

37

theBlind_ Apr 2, 2026 +9

Hell is hell and war is war. And of those, the latter is worse. At least in hell there's no innocents involved. From M. A. S. H.

9

yosisoy Apr 2, 2026 -9

Do you know what the word countermeasure means? Also, to quote from that very link: >NSRI's cadre of chemists, biologists, engineers and mission support specialists, with researchers across the University of Nebraska System (NU), works to improve the U.S. capability to deter, detect, mitigate and defeat chemical and biological threats. Doesn't sound like developing chemical weapons, quite the contrary.

-9

LovelieLuna Apr 3, 2026 -3

Wha-what?! That's terrorism. Not like our brave heroes having to do what must be done.

-3

Im_Your_Turbo_Lover Apr 2, 2026 +5

Someone really ought to tell Vali Nasr that... I feel bad for Johns Hopkins having such a moron teaching there. I guess he got his panties in a twist over his idol Khamenei being killed. :( Poor baby

5

Menethea Apr 2, 2026 -20

I was waiting for the “dual use” justification. Of course, it has about as much validity as the US Army Air Corps bombing German villages because they had a crossroads that could potentially be utilized by military traffic

-20

yosisoy Apr 2, 2026 +32

Ah yes, the US Army, the real bad guys of WWII

32

Intrepid_Egg_7722 Apr 2, 2026 +13

Yeah, bad example, because the crossroads would have made that a legitimate military target. Just because something would make you sad doesn't mean it's a war crime.

13

Trail_Goat Apr 2, 2026 +13

So, a lot of validity?

13

-113points Apr 2, 2026 -25

so the institute was bombed based on a 'concern' 20 years ago of another country? how many school girls you guys need to kill to rest this debacle?

-25

yosisoy Apr 2, 2026 +11

I haven't killed any school girls, how about you?

11

Funny-Ambition-7631 Apr 2, 2026 +148

This institute has been flagged by many countries including Japan, UK, US and even Canada for potential link for developing chemical weapons. https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/safeguarding-your-research/guidelines-and-tools-implement-research-security/sensitive-technology-research-and-affiliations-concern/named-research-organizations

148

WISavant Apr 2, 2026 +30

So weird how only China, Iran, and Russia are potentially developing chemical weapons. Meanwhile, back here in the world of things that have actually happened it was the US and Germany that provide the material and knowledge for Iraq to actually use chemical weapons against Iran.

30

Special_Ad712 Apr 2, 2026 +20

Iraq started developing it back in the 70s. Sadam Hussein was one of the ones who started it, with a ton of equipment and assistance from West Germany firms (who uhh, had prior experience).

20

call-the-wizards Apr 2, 2026 +24

Point me to a single source, leak, or whistleblower saying the US is developing biological weapons.

24

Old_Leopard1844 Apr 3, 2026 +2

But what about super secret US labs in Ukraine that are developing anti-Russia virus that is transmittable by mosquitos?

2

call-the-wizards Apr 3, 2026 +1

Funded by Epstein ofc

1

soldiernerd Apr 2, 2026 +9

Iran would be completely within its rights to bomb our chemical weapons infrastructure

9

lookieherehere Apr 2, 2026 -9

It's different when we do it dummy

-9

GozuLoulou Apr 2, 2026 -4

This 4 countries are definitely not the US and 3 of it’s vassals.

-4

Djcalied Apr 2, 2026 +233

Ah yes, Iran is such a global leader and player in infectious disease research... This facility was recognized globally as a risk for producing biological weapons. I don't support the continued bombing but this headline is sensational at best and misleading at worst.

233

Onion217 Apr 2, 2026 +76

Yes this is all noise. Iranian government did a horrendous job combating covid (I have family in graves due to their malpractice). Clickbait sensational nonsense for sure

76

WISavant Apr 2, 2026 -13

Iran's COVID deaths per million are less than half the United States'. Also, dozens of US universities work with the military on bioweapons research. Are Johns Hopkins and the University of Nebraska also a legitimate target?

-13

Djcalied Apr 2, 2026 +31

If Iran had the capabilities of the US military, do you really think they wouldn't be hitting similar targets as the US is currently.. You think Iran would be MORE discriminate or less than the US is currently? These are the people who chant death to America in the streets, I doubt they would have any restraint if they had the means.

31

WISavant Apr 2, 2026 -13

The US is supposed to be better than the Iranian regime. Not by a little, not occasionally, all the time. By leaps and bounds. You comparing actual US/Israeli actions to imaginary Iranian actions tells me all I need to know. It should tell you things too.

-13

Djcalied Apr 2, 2026 +12

Maybe you misunderstood my comment, I am saying the US is currently doing 'better' than the Iranians would if the roles were reversed. Your holier than thou attitude is childish and does not make you seem intelligent btw.

12

jazir55 Apr 2, 2026 +7

>Iran's COVID deaths per million are less than half the United States' That isn't the dunk you think it is when the US *intentionally* fucked over safety authorities due to Trump specifically. The fact that they failed that hard while not denying COVID even existed like Trump did is testament to their incompetence. In fact, Trump *wanted* it to spread more since he thought democratic states would be disproportionately affected and effectively encouraged the spread, which actually backfired and blew up in his face because *his* supporters are the ones that thought it was a conspiracy and hate masks. What exactly is Iran's excuse for f****** up that badly?

7

jrstinkfish Apr 2, 2026 -21

Let me guess, those biological weapons have been 2 weeks away for the past 30 years as well, like their nukes? Also, we bombed a school and killed 150 children.

-21

Djcalied Apr 2, 2026 +17

Did you even read the article...? Not sure what the other war crimes have to do with this topic but yes, the sky is blue!

17

ComeOnIWantUsername Apr 2, 2026 -31

> Iran is such a global leader and player in infectious disease research... Even if it isn't, it still plays its role

-31

Man_under_Bridge420 Apr 2, 2026 +12

What role?

12

Johannes_P Apr 2, 2026 -8

OTO, Institut Pasteur isn't exactly into the making of bioweapons.

-8

DoremusJessup Apr 2, 2026 -96

Gee, I didn't know you were an infectious disease specialist

-96

TheDarthSnarf Apr 2, 2026 +73

There has been information out about both the Pasteur Institute and the Razi Institute, and their links to bioweapons, for a while now. RUSI (Royal United Services Institute) even put commentary out within the last couple of weeks: [The Threat No One is Talking About in Iran](https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/threat-no-one-talking-about-iran)

73

Djcalied Apr 2, 2026 +44

Watch out man if you say anything negative or truthful about Iran you obviously must be a pro-war trump bootlicker naziz!1!! /s

44

VenoBot Apr 2, 2026 -30

Two sides of the same coin. The way you’re reacting and feeling is the same shit as the group you despise. Adds nothing but discourse

-30

PissOnYourParade Apr 2, 2026 +11

I'm not a Trump bootlicker or IRGC shill. We should never have started this war. We super, super, super fucked up targeting (or mistargeting) a primary school. But now that we're here, let's take biological and chemical weapons off the table.

11

VenoBot Apr 2, 2026

Agreed. If the info are true, then yeah. Bomb it to smithereens. I should probably look into it a bit more. See if there’s an early warning for civilians in the region.

0

Djcalied Apr 2, 2026 +22

as if it takes more than half a brain to recognize sensational headlines and articles. Accuracy matters otherwise its just propaganda-adjacent content.

22

GK0NATO Apr 2, 2026 +37

So are the telegraph/the guardian just British aljazeera now?

37

PeppyBunnyx Apr 2, 2026 +152

Dropping high explosives on a facility that actively houses cholera and other infectious disease samples feels like the absolute worst way to play biological r*******. The collateral damage of a containment breach is terrifying

152

Man_under_Bridge420 Apr 2, 2026 +34

They wont survive

34

THROWAWTRY Apr 2, 2026 -19

You don't know that

-19

Man_under_Bridge420 Apr 2, 2026 +21

> Vibrio cholerae, the bacteria that causes cholera, can survive on dry surfaces (fomites) at room temperature for 1 to 7 days I imagine a fire and explosion will significantly shorten that time

21

Trail_Goat Apr 2, 2026 +13

Uh, yeah, anybody willing to look up what environments those diseases survive in knows that.

13

TheDarthSnarf Apr 2, 2026 +73

Depends on what type of warheads were used. There are specific types of High-explosive incendiary (HEI) warheads designed specifically for targeting chemical and biological weapons facilities. [Here's a relevant piece from Bellingcat](https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2026/03/07/the-incendiary-bomb-never-seen-in-israel-before/) that covers this type of device.

73

-113points Apr 2, 2026 -43

And so you trust what US does the right thing after bombing a girl's school twice?

-43

Man_under_Bridge420 Apr 2, 2026 +18

It looks on fire

18

-113points Apr 2, 2026 -24

and firefighters will fight it, hospitals will receive victims with smoke and vapors with pathogens... what's next? let's bomb Chernobyl?

-24

Man_under_Bridge420 Apr 2, 2026 +18

HOW DO THEY SURVIVE THE FIRE!!!! You understand why we cook our food 😂😂😂😂

18

Intrepid_Egg_7722 Apr 2, 2026 +10

Based on the fact that they posted the same "what about the schoolgirls bombings" strawmen multiple times on just this one comment thread, I am going to assume that they don't know or care about the actual specifics here. They're not here to argue in good faith.

10

nigaraze Apr 2, 2026 -1

It’s not a strawman if the basis on which schoolgirls double tapped happened is because we fired all the staff in the department of defense that could’ve prevented that. And we are expected that this war mongering government had the mental foresight to select the right kind of bomb for the sake of Iranians?

-1

[deleted] Apr 2, 2026 +83

[deleted]

83

Fruitcake6969 Apr 2, 2026 +49

People are ridiculous. This is why i hate listnook. Too many people acting like experts when they have no idea what they’re talking about. When someone is speaking confidently on listnook, you can just assume they’re wrong.

49

TheOriginalBroCone Apr 2, 2026 +2

Yep, the other people replying to you are the classic Listnook stereotype too.

2

O_its_that_guy_again Apr 2, 2026

Exhibit A: this d*****

0

Moral-Relativity Apr 2, 2026 +6

Specific warheads for what? Destroying pathogens?

6

Man_under_Bridge420 Apr 2, 2026 +5

High explosive

5

-113points Apr 2, 2026 -5

oh, pathogens don't survive our environment that's new

-5

Man_under_Bridge420 Apr 2, 2026 +9

They dont lmao… they survive in hosts

9

Fruitcake6969 Apr 2, 2026 +46

Oof, you are 100% spreading misinformation.

46

[deleted] Apr 2, 2026 +18

[removed]

18

BishSlapDiplomacy Apr 2, 2026 +18

Lol, you’ve been watching too many zombie movies.

18

No-Faithlessness2879 Apr 2, 2026 +6

Considering Iran was developing chemical weapons in the facility, corroborated by multiple countries intelligence agencies, it is a legitimate military target. Also take into account the chemical weapons this regime has used against their own people in the past, Their current government shouldn't be given the benefit of the doubt here.

6

soursop_magnolia Apr 2, 2026 -13

literally this. You don't bomb a Level 3 bio facility unless you want to find out what aerosolized cholera looks like in a populated city. Absolute nightmare scenario

-13

KrunchrapSuprem Apr 2, 2026 +17

Cholera isn’t even worked with at bio containment level 3 and is not infectious by aerosol btw

17

Fruitcake6969 Apr 2, 2026 +35

That’s just not how that works. Cholera is a fragile bacteria and almost certainly gets completely destroyed upon impact.

35

Man_under_Bridge420 Apr 2, 2026 +1

They were explosive and fire resistant strains 😂😂

1

InterstellarReddit Apr 2, 2026 -21

IMO that was the intention here there’s no way they picked that target by accident. They know exactly what they’re doing. Hitting a medical research center is in the same area of hitting a hospital. They serve no purpose but to make the population suffer when it’s gone. Hospitals/research centers serve no threat either. So their only justification is purely to make innocent people suffer.

-21

PubesMcDuck Apr 2, 2026 -6

What part of any of the last 3 weeks makes you think they “know exactly what they’re doing”

-6

CuratedAcceptance Apr 2, 2026 +3

The heads have no idea, but the actual military commanders are more than likely capable and would be executing plans developed over years.

3

iamstephen1128 Apr 2, 2026 +2

They know exactly what they are doing *militarily*. The US military is an extremely well oiled and well funded machine. When they want to hit something, they hit something, and if something gets hit, they either intended for it to get hit or were aware of it and didn't care. But all the tactical victory in the world will do absolutely no good since nobody, including POTUS has any idea what we're doing *strategically*

2

Drak_is_Right Apr 2, 2026 +7

Not surprised. Anything with a remote link to theoretically being used in the development of nuclear, biological, or chemical WMDs will be on Israels list to be hit.

7

Frequently_lucky Apr 2, 2026 +6

No more bacteriological weapon program for Iran!

6

UrsaMajor7th Apr 2, 2026 +2

They could have just appointed RFK jr as its head and waited

2

Pickupyoheel Apr 3, 2026 +2

Iran working overtime on their sob stories

2

bandita07 Apr 2, 2026 -2

The anti vax morons are happy I guess..

-2

bakpecko Apr 2, 2026 -2

Kennedy at CDC is throwing a celebration party as we are typing

-2

Electrical-Staff735 Apr 2, 2026 +1

[ Removed by Listnook ]

1

[deleted] Apr 2, 2026 -27

Today war crime is just like yesterdays war crimes. The US is fighting an illegal and offensive war against a non threat on behalf of a genocidal Israeli regime. Edit: looks like the bot farm found my comment, went from +15 to 1 in 5 minutes. You can down vote me but you will never make me stop being anti-war. I am not pro Iran. I am pro humans staying alive. Edit 2: I dont know a single real life American that is happy about what is happening. I know they exist, but on the internet they seem to be everywhere. Why is that?

-27

par-a-dox-i-cal Apr 2, 2026 +8

>The US is fighting an illegal and offensive war against a non threat on behalf of a genocidal Israeli regime. 🥱

8

Totoques22 Apr 3, 2026 +1

For real, this moron got absolutely everything wrong

1

novarodent Apr 2, 2026 +33

> The Pasteur Institute in Iran has previously been the subject of scrutiny over the possibility of its facilities being misused to produce biological weapons. > In 2007, the Japanese government listed it as an “entity of concern” for biological and chemical weapons proliferation, and in 2008 Britain listed the centre as a potential risk for procurement related to weapons of mass destruction. Reading is hard.

33

Wintermute_Is_Coming Apr 2, 2026 -6

"Potential risk" and "concern" from 20 years ago is nowhere near the level of justification necessary to bomb a medical research institute.

-6

novarodent Apr 2, 2026 +28

Actually it is. It’s been flagged by numerous countries. That they’ve known about it since the 90s doesn’t make it less justified, it’s actually the opposite, be serious.

28

hotpajamas Apr 2, 2026 -21

It is serious. A concern 30 years ago is not enough to justify an illegal act of war today.

-21

novarodent Apr 2, 2026 +22

You’re acting like someone was just concerned 30 years ago and that was the end of it. Japan, the UK, the US and Canada have had the site flagged and have continued to flag it as recently as 2023.

22

hotpajamas Apr 2, 2026 -23

And why didnt Japan, the UK, and Canada commit acts of war illegally if they were so concerned? Isn’t it justified by your logic?

-23

novarodent Apr 2, 2026 +21

You’re talking nonsense, because none of them were at war then. We know the Russians engineer biological weapons at the VECTOR Institute yet Japan hasn’t bombed them either. It would be a valid target if Ukraine chose to strike, however. Don’t be ridiculous.

21

hotpajamas Apr 2, 2026 -17

lol they weren’t at war because they didn’t start illegal wars over mere concerns. that’s my point good job.

-17

novarodent Apr 2, 2026 +9

Nobody’s talking about the legality of the war, but the legality of this strike in the context of the war. You have no point.

9

soulstormfire Apr 2, 2026 -9

You guys haven't learned a single thing from the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq, have you? :D

-9

ChatamKay Apr 2, 2026 -2

And they call Iran terrorists.

-2

Totoques22 Apr 3, 2026 +1

Cause they are and always have been

1

ack4 Apr 2, 2026 -10

But hey, at least oil prices are up and munitions stockpiles are low! ....wait.

-10

AleWatcher Apr 2, 2026 -28

Alternate headline for better accuracy; US COMMITS WAR CRIMES

-28

lamBerticus Apr 2, 2026 +7

If you are clueless, that's probably true.

7

Stunning_North_7549 Apr 2, 2026 -19

This is all Putin's doing. This starts and ends with Putin. Trump started and is running this war with Putin telling him what to do. Iran is just cannon fodder for Putin.

-19

Tw0Rails Apr 2, 2026 -3

Yes, excuse a warcrime done by the US and / or Israel by blaming Putin.

-3

Childoftheway Apr 2, 2026 -17

It appears we are going scorched earth. I saw another video (that got locked) showing what looked like an important bridge being blown up. To keep them from getting nukes (or whatever we're there for) we are going to destroy everything of value within their country with air strikes, based on what Trump said. I think we owe them a land invasion if that's our actual plan.

-17

jamie9910 Apr 2, 2026

Strangle them from the air. No oil. No factories. No bridges, No electricity. They can't run a country of 90 million with no economy.

0

Childoftheway Apr 2, 2026

With no evidence that will make any difference when the army has all the guns. Unless you think it's acceptable to literally strangle a country to death, knowing that many of them oppose the regime?

0

HumanShadow Apr 2, 2026 +5

People always start talking like they're war strategists when conflicts break out. Just like how the act of purchasing a PPV event suddenly turns every dude at your house into a boxing expert.

5

AntonioBarbarian Apr 2, 2026 -1

Good to see how Americans actually care about the Iranian people, maybe you guys DO deserve a third Trump term after all, hell, give him a fourth even for funsies.

-1

StatisticianNo5402 Apr 3, 2026

So any consequences for us?

0

xX609s-hartXx Apr 2, 2026 -5

Trump bombing like he was a Russian in Ukraine...

-5

Iran’s Pasteur medical research centre ‘heavily damaged’ in strike: Large parts of the facility, which plays a key role in combating infectious diseases like cholera and Covid-19, have been reduced to rubble

💬 Send a Message

129 Comments