· 119 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 9, 2026 at 12:03 PM

Iran's president says Israeli strikes on Lebanon render negotiations meaningless

Posted by Infodataplace

🚩 Report this post

119 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Tiaan Apr 9, 2026 +1187
"In a remarkable statement Monday afternoon, Lebanon called for direct talks with Israel on “permanent arrangements for security and stability on our borders,” while accusing the Iranian-backed militant group Hezbollah of betraying the country. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun detailed his plan during a virtual meeting with European Union officials, in which he leveled sharp criticism at Hezbollah and Israel for what he called “an attempt to corner my country. Calling the Shiite Muslim group “an armed faction … that places no value on Lebanon’s interest nor on the life of its people,” Aoun said Hezbollah “wanted to achieve the fall of the State of Lebanon, under aggression and chaos.” He accused the group of working “for the sake of the calculations of the Iranian regime.”
1187
Difficult_Main_5617 Apr 9, 2026 +886
Nice to see Lebanon taking accountability and throwing Hezbollah under the bus finally.
886
OkBackground8670 Apr 9, 2026 +321
one of the best things to happen from this war.
321
Epyr Apr 9, 2026 +75
I mean, they talk like this a fair bit but they are still not actively moving against Hezbollah themselves which is why Israel is doing what it's doing.
75
I_am_le_tired Apr 9, 2026 +78
How surprising, they're trying to avoid reigniting their own civil war?!
78
SeaworthinessSome454 Apr 9, 2026 +138
Lebanon can’t move against Hezbollah on their own. They don’t have the capability to fend them off. Hezbollah is Iran and Iran is far stronger than Lebanon. This is the same shit that’s going on with Ukraine. They need help, they’re never going to be able to fight them off on their own.
138
ProteinFarts_ Apr 9, 2026 +51
They literally can't even garner the political support to start fending them off either since Hezbollah representatives make up a decent base within the government. So it's better to say that Lebanon effectively has a armed political branch within the government that has ceded itself to Iran, but is propping up the political entity of Lebanon as a bullet sponge.
51
Environmental_Coat60 Apr 9, 2026 +11
Which is so weird to me because the majority of Lebanese want Hezbollah to disarm, and don’t want to keep fighting Israel to support the Palestinians (as Hezbollah has said they’re doing).
11
ProteinFarts_ Apr 9, 2026 +14
From Google: "The Lebanese Parliament (Chamber of Deputies) is a unicameral body with 128 seats, strictly divided on a 50:50 basis between Christians and Muslims. This sectarian, or confessional, system further allocates these seats among 18 recognized religious sects (e.g., Maronite, Sunni, Shia, Greek Orthodox, Druze) and mandates a 4-year term for directly elected deputies. " and then the Muslim mandated seats are further broken down **"**Muslim Total (64 seats)**:** 27 Shia, 27 Sunni, 8 Druze, 2 Alawite" So the shia seats are institutionally required (probably to avoid religious conflict and ensure representation), but the shia government officials are waging a religious war regardless on behalf of Iran. So the situation doesn't really seem like it can change unless Hezbollah takes a confirmed L and changes their representation in Parliament to be something that is not aligned with Iran (which given their Shia religious participation automatically means they are subservient to the Ayatollah), or Lebanon will need to drum up the requisite political support to change their founding documents (which likely would require a civil war, or Israel blowing them to pieces)
14
Environmental_Coat60 Apr 9, 2026 +8
The Lebanese Shia seem to still be very supportive of Hezbollah remaining armed, and supporting the Palestinians with armed conflict with Israel. It sounds like those 27 seats will remain controlled by Hezbollah for the foreseeable future.
8
zenbowman Apr 9, 2026 +6
A majority want Hezbollah to disarm, but actually enforcing that is a much trickier matter, given that Hezbollah is armed and organized.
6
oalsaker Apr 9, 2026 +14
Lebanon's army is much smaller than Hezbollah. Imagine your country having another army in it, but five times bigger, full of zealots and better funded.
14
RheagarTargaryen Apr 9, 2026 +20
I don’t think Lebanon has the ability to take them on. Hezbollah is a paramilitary force controlled by Iran with more military power than Lebanon. Even if they got rid of Hezbollah’s influence in the government, fighting them would be almost like going to war against Iran itself.
20
h310dOr Apr 9, 2026 +8
They don't have the power to. They need help, not mindless bombing.
8
SeaworthinessSome454 Apr 9, 2026 +135
About f****** time. Hopefully the general public opinion finally realizes that Iran is behind that and stops praising Hezbollah simply bc they oppose Israel
135
LeoDiamant Apr 9, 2026 +93
Not sure the general public is praising hezbollah tbh.
93
Deltasims Apr 9, 2026 +64
But the IRGC troll farms sure are. And our impressionable youth is listening...
64
LeoDiamant Apr 9, 2026 +32
I have yet to meet a youth in America that is a Hezbollah fan. Im sure there are… just not a statistically important amount.
32
arathorn3 Apr 9, 2026 +30
Hasan(My favourite Flag is Hezbollah) Piker has 3 million Twitch subscribers, mostly Zoomers and whatever the generration younger than them. The exist.
30
SeaworthinessSome454 Apr 9, 2026 +14
Ppl view this as Israel invading Lebanon. They’re not realizing that it’s really Israel against Iran, in Lebanon. Lebanon’s government is entirely against Hezbollah and Hezbollah/Iran is the one trying (and largely succeeding) to take over Lebanon. People would be far less sympathetic to Iran if they finally made the connection that Hezbollah and Hamas (and others) are an extension of Iran.
14
LeoDiamant Apr 9, 2026 +11
Again who is sympathetic to irans leadership? Iv personally been wanting them gone since the 90s. This war is not helping in the way it is being conducted. There where a lot if clever ways that the US could pursuit this if the regime change they wanted rather than the way its being done. This is about posturing, control and money.
11
hatesnack Apr 9, 2026 +1
Ironically, Hamas is primarily around today because of Isreal. Netanyahu literally pushed for Qatar to send money to Hamas to keep them in power, cause he knew it would keep Palestine fragmented for Isreal to take over. Hell, Isreali government officials are basically responsible for the founding of Hamas. They pushed Yassin to expand his networks, which eventually became Hamas. Iran gives Hamas money and tech, but Isreal is the reason they are still around.
1
frosthowler Apr 9, 2026 +3
this never happened btw. Obama** pushed for Qatari money to be handed to Hamas in 2014 and choked Bibi to get it done. Bibi made a speech to his base about how it's fine that Qatari money is entering since it keeps Palestine divided. If he defied Obama and didn't let Gaza rebuild after 2014, you'd be sitting here screeching about how Israel is responsible for radicalizing Gaza because it didn't let them rebuild in 2014. Just f*** off already with these half-truths.
3
hatesnack Apr 9, 2026 +2
The CLASSIC "its Obamas fault". I haven't heard that one in a while. I guess Obama is responsible for creating Hamas is. The 70s and 80s too? Oh wait no, that was ALSO Isreal. They decided the best way to maintain a fractured Palestine was to support a key Islamic Brotherhood member, whose network turned into Hamas.
2
Ok-Description7073 Apr 9, 2026 +21
I’m pretty sure the vast majority of people can recognize that Hamas and Hezbollah are mere terroristic proxies. That said, the reason most people have a bigger problem with Israel is b/c their terrorism is state sponsored and backed my modern western weaponry. And, notable in the context of public opinion, by American tax dollars.
21
Difficult_Main_5617 Apr 9, 2026 +17
No man they actually cant. If you spend 5 minutes on listnook you'd get the impression they are the good guys.
17
Available_Finger_513 Apr 9, 2026 +13
And yet the only people saying that are the the people telling me I supposed to be worried about people saying it...
13
SeaworthinessSome454 Apr 9, 2026 -1
I agree. Hamas is somehow the victim in Gaza, not the ones that started the war. Hezbollah can invade Lebanon and it won’t catch media coverage or action from the west but Israel is the bad guy for invading them. The headline is “Israel invades Lebanon”, not “Lebanon captured by Hezbollah”. And the houthies hardly got any attention for attacking cargo ships in speedboats long before the us/israel/iran war. Iran is the common denominator for problems in the Middle East, there’s a reason that virtually all of the Middle East hates Iran, and Iran has been fighting offensive wars for years now. Israel is fighting a defensive war by trying to cut off Irans proxies at the source (Iran), and the US joined to help its ally to end the conflicts across the Middle East. Iran (and their proxy forces) is not the victim that people somehow believe they are
-1
_Lucille_ Apr 9, 2026 +10
Correction: both Iran and Israel have been fighting offensive wars. This is not some back or white situation: it's a war between two problematic nations.
10
TrumpBad_UpvotesPls Apr 9, 2026 +4
Meh they're all talk. Not like this is the first time they've made statements like this.
4
One-Engineering-4505 Apr 9, 2026 +3
Yeah, I'm not sure why every time Iran's president says something its ground breaking news. The guy doesn't have much power in Iran. If the supreme leader or a higher up in IRGC says something, it means something. This guy's words are just vapour.
3
Suspicious-Coffee20 Apr 10, 2026 +1
They really should. Honnestly i f****** hate israel but the way some will tell you with a steaight face rhat when they get attacked they are supposed to do nothing is crazy. Im canadian and if some organizations start launching missiles into the usa and they do nothing for like 24hr they woule immediately be invading that part of canada.
1
faux_italian Apr 10, 2026 +1
Now if only the mass psychosis that has infected the unaffected western world can be broken allowing the strangest coalition ever to see that maybe just maybe Israel gets to begin reparations in whatever way makes sense.
1
WeUsedToBeNumber10 Apr 9, 2026 +50
The Lebanese government has been trying to assert control over its sercuroy situation for a while. This is a positive step forward for its legitimacy and joint security discussions with Israel will help. 
50
CoronaLVR Apr 9, 2026 +38
Too bad that Lebanon is a failed state and it's government and military has no capability to do anything about Hezbollah. They told the Iranian ambassador to leave, that he is a persona non grata. He told them to f*** off and stayed anyway.
38
MaxPlanck_420 Apr 9, 2026 +16
He can say f*** off but all his diplomatic protections f*** off too. Now he is just a militant commander as far as Israel is concerned.
16
Beardmanta Apr 9, 2026 +9
Until israel bombs him and Spain/France (and of course listnook) cries bloody murder
9
yosisoy Apr 9, 2026 +5
That is incredible actually. Hope there will be a peace between Lebanon and Israel
5
Commercial-Lack6279 Apr 9, 2026 +2
Listnook in meltdown mode
2
bkny88 Apr 9, 2026 +432
Lebanon and the UN should simply enforce UN resolution 1701. I don’t even think they’ve tried to do so since 2006.
432
ilivgur Apr 9, 2026 +157
There's a mechanism in the resolution that would "activate" the peacekeepers and help the Lebanese government disarm Hezbollah. It never once activated it, because Hezbollah sits at the same table that decision must be made.
157
captaindomon Apr 9, 2026 +64
How would they do that? Ask nicely?
64
DurangoGango Apr 9, 2026 +65
> How would they do that? Ask nicely? There already is a UN force present in Lebanon tasked with assisting the Lebanese Armed Forces in asserting Lebanese state authority and its monopoly on armed force. They haven't done jack shit for decades because the rest of Lebanon does not want to fight Hezbollah, and the countries contributing to Unifil don't want to start getting flag-draped coffings, which WILL happen if they start forcibly disarming Hezbollah. Both have been plenty happy to let Hezbollah bomb Israel and blame Israel when it strikes back. If the decision is made, the LAF and Unifil can start fighting Hezbollah in coordination with the IDF.
65
arathorn3 Apr 9, 2026 +23
In Fact some of those UNFiL troops have been caught red handed aiding Hezbollah in the past.
23
bkny88 Apr 9, 2026 +102
lol why put in the resolutions if there is no enforcement mechanism? This is lunacy. Lebanon needs to work with the UN to expel or disarm Hezbollah - that’s what the security council agreed to.
102
Mcfallen_5 Apr 9, 2026 +51
It would mean civil war within the country. Hezbollah basically operates as its own government already.
51
bkny88 Apr 9, 2026 +50
It’s only like this because they didn’t enforce the resolution. The UN is a joke. And Lebanon has allowed itself to be consumed from within.
50
jimi15 Apr 9, 2026 +13
The UN is a forum. Youree talking about the Security Council which is a seperate entity from the legislative body. Functionally a military alliance with the same name.
13
case-o-nuts Apr 9, 2026 +18
The UN has peacekeepers which according, to their mission statement, were there to enforce it.
18
Tyfereth Apr 9, 2026 +23
For the same reason they want Israel to ceasefire now - protecting Iran’s proxy Hezbollah was and is their goal
23
case-o-nuts Apr 9, 2026 +5
If they can't do it on their own, I'm sure Israel would be willing to coordinate help, instead of acting unilaterally.
5
SunMachiavelliTzu Apr 9, 2026 +28
Yeah, but in stead the UN puts 'peacekeepers' there to interfere with Israeli operations against Hezbollah and cries foul when they are caught in the crossfire... Either enforce the resolution or GTFO.
28
glumjonsnow Apr 10, 2026 +1
unlikely given that spain/italy are literally crying about being in the crossfire right now....unlikely my friend
1
Suspicious-Coffee20 Apr 10, 2026 +2
See this is the problem. Israel are in fact jsutified ti go into lebanon if they keep receiving attack from Lebanon.
2
Disc0Disc0Disc0 Apr 9, 2026 +86
They never had meaning in the first place
86
HarEr89 Apr 9, 2026 +53
He said that yesterday. Today he said they would go to the talks with the US.
53
LymelightTO Apr 9, 2026 +13
Wait, so is Hezbollah a proxy for the IRGC or not? Now I'm getting confused. It sounds like Iran is saying Hezbollah is functionally an extension of itself, but that can't be right. /s
13
MercantileReptile Apr 9, 2026 +17
Connecting their proxy needs/wants directly into diplomacy with and regarding Iran itself is a risky move. We all know it won't make a difference with the US. But the rest of the World would like a way forward that does not include proxy militia stirring up shit whenever Iran feels the need to throw sand into gears. Forcing the strait is not an option. Yet. As time goes by, Iran has a *thin* ledge on which to tread. Nobody wants to be aside Trump's America in this mess. Or for the mess to exist in the first place. But if Iran can't focus and drags all proxy demands into this, nothing will get done. And the clock will force a decision. Because oil reserves are going down. And once prices are no longer pushed, Governments will be forced to act. If they don't, people will. Either way, the resulting *zugzwang* would result in rash actions.
17
rubywpnmaster Apr 9, 2026 +6
Iran is harmless! We only funded and directed those terrorists to attack you! We didn’t take direct action! Also, said terrorists should be extended the same protections during a ceasefire that the Iran military receives! What f****** clowns
6
EcureuilHargneux Apr 9, 2026 +63
The Trump regime is so stupid and rotten they managed to give the authoritarian regime in Iran the morale high ground, unbelievable
63
Popular-Somewhere234 Apr 10, 2026 +1
No sorry the Iranian regime has 0 moral high ground after decades of funding terror and misinformation across the globe and killing thousand of iranians protesters nothing will change that...
1
Nanofeo Apr 9, 2026 -3
If you believe Iran has the moral* high ground, you really need to reassess.
-3
CanuckPanda Apr 9, 2026 +30
Compared to 80% of the planet’s governments? Of course not. Compared to the Israeli and American regimes? Yeah, lil’ bit.
30
TelluricThread0 Apr 9, 2026 +11
Iran killed 30,000 of their own people over a weekend. Gunned then down in the streets to prevent them from having freedom.
11
CanuckPanda Apr 9, 2026
They sure did. But they didn’t lie or obfuscate or flip flop about it happening. They were pretty open and honest about all the mass murdering going on. Can’t say the same about the American death camps. How many women have been raped and impregnated in ICE concentration camps? How many Latino children have gone permanently missing? E: downvoting me doesn’t disprove the simple reality that thousands of children and women are being held in concentration camps in the continental USA without due process, in inhumane conditions, subject to documented r***, while thousands of others have been “lost” in the system and the US government admits they can’t “find them”. At least the Iranian regime is *honest* about its murder of its own people; America can’t even do that.
0
Nanofeo Apr 9, 2026 +16
OPEN AND HONEST? You are SERIOUSLY calling the Islamic Regime "Open and Honest"?! They outright lied and said they killed only 3,000 people and it was because they were apparently all mossad agents. And do you know how many women are raped, impregnated, and killed in Iranian prisons? A LOT MORE than in the US. Do you know how many Iranian children have gone permanently missing and GUNNED DOWN in the streets? A LOT MORE than in ICE concentration camps. Please think about your bias for a second here. I'm not saying the US is some saint. But have some perspective and ability to criticize other governments besides just US and Israel for God's sake.
16
Vulllen Apr 9, 2026 +14
“Rules for thee, but not for me!” - IRGC
14
Ro-ftw Apr 9, 2026 +28
Iran's president has literally 0 power in the country right now. Who cares what he says.
28
Loni09 Apr 9, 2026 +32
Knowing Israel, it would suprise me if they halted all attacks for now in hopes of achieving a peace deal with Iran alongside the U.S. If you think about it, this moment in time is probably the best chance for Israel to go full throttle and do as much damage on Iran, not only because they are in a literal war with Iran right now, but also because they have the U.S under Trump on their team as well. Why would they want a peace deal? If anything, they would want this war to continue for as long as possible to achieve their goal of destroying Iran, its regime and its proxies as much as possible.
32
Gender_is_a_Fluid Apr 9, 2026 +19
Ah yes, the classic de-escalation tactic during negotiations of ramping up hostilities, I’m sure that will work.
19
seeasea Apr 9, 2026 +13
That's one of the oldest time tested negotiation tactics, like ever. Everyone wants to come to the negotiation table with the strongest position possible. So leading up to negotiation generally sees the highest violence. 
13
Aurorion Apr 9, 2026 +7
Yeah, that's what _they_ would want. Doesn't mean that the world would accept it, though. And there are limits to what Israel can do on it's own, especially since they don't have the capabilities for a ground invasion of Iran.
7
SubwayHero4Ever Apr 9, 2026 -2
Enlist and go get dismembered, get blown up or commit war crimes for pedophiles.
-2
niceufo777 Apr 9, 2026 +46
And what about the attacks by Hezbollah, which Iran itself uses as proxies? Hypocrites.
46
valentine-m-smith Apr 9, 2026 +12
I’m sure he mentioned the continued bombing of Israel by Hezbollah during his address… didn’t he?
12
LongErza Apr 9, 2026 +34
lmao, then you shouldn't have called them to join your war. Did you really think that Israel wouldn't use this opportunity?
34
not_having_fun Apr 9, 2026 -2
Actually the war is Israel's. Iran's just defending itself. 
-2
LymelightTO Apr 9, 2026 +15
"History begins on whatever date is most convenient for me."
15
skinnywolfe Apr 9, 2026 +17
Yes the nation that chants Death to Israel and supplies weapons and encourages attacks by other factions that have death to Israel, death to America is simply defending itself Won't someone think of the poor IRGC There is alot of missteps made by the Israeli Government, but striking back against an entire network of allied nations united to erase them is not one of them.
17
SunMachiavelliTzu Apr 9, 2026 -6
This opinion shows a lack of neuron activity on so many levels... I can imagine the user name checks out...
-6
Aurorion Apr 9, 2026 +14
It's not an opinion, it's a fact. The war was launched by the US and Israel on 28th Feb. Unless, of course, you only believe in "alternative facts", like for example that this is just a continuation of a war that has been waging for thousands of years and some cavemen from millenia ago are the only ones to be blamed for it...
14
finder787 Apr 9, 2026 +1
> The war was launched by the US and Israel on 28th Feb. Always accuse others of what you yourself are doing. This conflict is a continuation of a war that was initiated by HAMAS jumping the gun and attacking Israel before other Iranian assets in the region were ready (Houthis, Hezbollah, Iraq Militias, various Syrian groups, etc).
1
Aurorion Apr 9, 2026 +5
Oh, an alternate facts guy. Do you by any chance work at the White House? Because this sort of hilariously ridiculous narrative is pushed by Trump's team to explain why he has started a war without actually starting it. 🙄 Maybe this is part of a war that started in 2004? Or maybe 1948? Or maybe 1909? Or maybe the 18th century? There have _always_ been conflicts, especially in that part of the world, and the "_what came first_" game can be stretched across millenia. _This_ particular war, though, was started by the US and Israel precisely on 28th February, 2006, no matter whatever history you link it to.
5
HotFartore Apr 10, 2026 +2
How could a country have two armies, with different agendas, backed by outside powers, aka Iran for so long. Hezbollah has to go, I said this before, and I say it again. Hezbollah is an obstacle for peace in the region. It has to go one way or the other. An infected Iranian apendice that needs to be cut off for good. Linking Lebanon Hezbollah ally with US-Iran treaty is not right. And Iran should take this opportunity while they have time.
2
infraGem Apr 9, 2026 +31
Stopping attacks on Hezbollah would be so stupid of Israel... I am honestly surprised people thought that would happen. Hezbollah is at its weakest and has a border with Israel. Now is the ideal time to hurt them.
31
Ehzek Apr 9, 2026 +20
When I saw that in the terms, despite everything else insane on there, I knew that one wasn't happening. Might as well put Ukraine and Russia on the ceasefire too.
20
Fine-Entertainer-507 Apr 9, 2026 +39
They literally struck people without warning while they were under the impression that there was a ceasefire. They killed so many innocent people and children for no reason other than to cause a massacre They could have issued an evacuation warning and still hit the target but they deliberately choose to strike people and cause maximum destruction
39
EliteKill Apr 9, 2026 +18
What are you talking about? The latest hostilities started when Hezbollah launched 6 rockets towards Israel "in support" of Iran.
18
GoochofArabia Apr 9, 2026 +7
Amnesia over here forgetting Israel struck Lebanon for over a year during a “ceasefire”
7
EliteKill Apr 9, 2026 +16
Israel struck Hizbollah operative attempting to rebuild military positions. It was all under the terms of the ceasefire.
16
DurangoGango Apr 9, 2026 +12
> They killed so many innocent people and children for no reason other than to cause a massacre Have you learned nothing from the last 3 years, if not those before? it's always the same game: - Israel strikes something - Immediately islamist media claims that they hit exclusively civilians in an act of sheer unmotivated evil, posts a huge death toll that they somehow counted within minutes - After the media cycle has moved on, obituaries and martyr eulogies come out showing that Israel had indeed targeted militants, as it always maintained Rinse and repeat. This happens again and again and again, yet you people let yourselves get duped without end. It'd be comical if the result weren't so tragic: you validate their tactics and therefore encourage them to keep doing this.
12
HousingThrowAway1092 Apr 9, 2026 +12
What you are describing is a war crime and does nothing to secure long term peace or stability for Israel. Bombing civilians radicalizes them. It doesn’t make Israel any safer to bomb civilian centres. This isn’t a video game “hurting” the hezbollah accomplishes nothing. Israel is bombing reporters, women and children without any acceptability. Netanyahu doesn’t want peace or security. He knows that he is going to jail for corruption the second he loses power. He wants chaos so he can remain in power and avoid jail for as long as possible.
12
derpyninja Apr 9, 2026 +1
I agree with a lot of what you’re saying but it’s not just Netanyahu avoiding jail. It’s a massive effort by the entire Israeli government and its various branches, IDF, spies, lobbyists, media moguls, etc. let’s not pin it on just one guy. Israel won’t just become a different country when Netanyahu leaves office.
1
Aurorion Apr 9, 2026 +3
How many deaths of little kids in Lebanon would you say is an acceptable number in order to achieve that? Because Israel has already killed 130+.
3
transracialHasanFan Apr 9, 2026 +5
That's it? Not even 1000? If they're actively trying to kill civilians as you insist they are doing a shit job at it
5
coldmocaccino Apr 9, 2026 +35
It's all because of Pakistan handing out different terms of the negotiations to US and Iran. Edit: Source: https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/pakistan-blame-us-iran-ceasefire-deal-confusion-lebanon-israel-2893580-2026-04-09
35
CryHavocAU Apr 9, 2026 +173
I’d be careful trusting an Indian source talking about Pakistan.
173
BradDaddyStevens Apr 9, 2026 +59
I hate to say it but I don’t trust any Indian news source these days. I’ve just seen way too many instances of completely fabricated bullshit reported by multiple Indian outlets as if it was pure fact with an obvious agenda behind it. One that sticks out in my head was about an Indian college student who was supposedly found brutally murdered in a forest in Boston (not a thing, btw) and how it was clearly a racially/ethnically motivated attack - I saw this then looked it up and found that literally no local source was reporting on it. In reality it ended up being a kid who killed himself at a completely different school that was over an hour away from Boston.
59
Aurorion Apr 9, 2026 +27
Or about anything. I'm an Indian and I avoid Indian news sources as much as I can. All are of low quality and also controlled by the government in one way or the other.
27
SquareAdvent Apr 9, 2026 +51
Feels like at the end of this Iran and US agrees to invade Pakistan.... Like the translation comedy skit 😂
51
cptmcsexy Apr 9, 2026 +11
Uh oh hot dog
11
GodSaveTheKing1867 Apr 9, 2026 +19
Hilarious idea - Pakistan is basically Iran and Afghanistan combined.
19
realistweirdist Apr 9, 2026 +7
with nukes
7
Santorju Apr 9, 2026 +5
No, you coughed!
5
Fit-Professional3095 Apr 9, 2026 +10
I just landed in Mexico. The officer looked at my passport and said 'Looks like you guys failed again '. Im confused.
10
coldmocaccino Apr 9, 2026 +2
Might be a translation error
2
KaQuu Apr 9, 2026 +15
Ah yes totally possible theory spread by 1 month old account. We believe you...
15
par-a-dox-i-cal Apr 9, 2026 +2
I hope there will be lasting peace between Lebanon and Israel.
2
Squirrel-Sovereign Apr 9, 2026 +4
Israel is not fighting lebanon. They are fighting hezbolah
4
Ultra_Metal Apr 9, 2026 -4
Lebanon was never part of the deal. This is just an excuse the Islamic Republic is using to justify more terrorism and war crimes.
-4
Mini_gunslinger Apr 9, 2026 +5
Were you in the room when the deal was brokered?
5
transracialHasanFan Apr 9, 2026 +1
Hundreds of people in these comments were evidently
1
Shebalied Apr 9, 2026 +9
When is Lebanon a part of Iran?????
9
danfmac Apr 9, 2026 +10
Iran gets to decide what is required just as much as the US does. If Iran says they won’t open the Strait unless Israel stops bombing Lebanon then that is part of the deal.
10
CombatRedRover Apr 9, 2026 +4
Almost like the Iranians don't understand Westphalian nation states, while hiding behind the concept of Westphalian nation states...
4
Zib559 Apr 9, 2026 +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
Desert-Noir Apr 9, 2026 +1
So stupid question.. does Israel do attacks on Saturdays or do they observe the Sabbath?
1
Jristz Apr 9, 2026 +1
So part of the deal for what i see reported in may country was that then original deal included Israel stopping bombarding Lebanon... So, it's does make Sense that if Israel wont follows it up then Is a meaningless negotiation
1
Main_Statistician579 Apr 10, 2026
Iran wow just a bunch of goat loving leaders with no brains or heart. Talibinish mindset
0
← Back to Board