ListNook

OldMembership9295 May 6, 2026 +802

Is it all ships or just ships that pay them or go to/from their ports

802

Amoral_Abe May 6, 2026 +472

"With the end of the aggressors' threats and in the shadow of new procedures, the possibility of safe and sustainable passage through the strait will be provided," it added, without specifying the new procedures. The answer is probably, if you follow new specific procedures for Iran they won't personally attack... maybe. However, whatever procedures they implement will likely be prevented by the US blockade so..... the strait likely isn't open.

472

itsFelbourne May 6, 2026 +251

The IRGC has already fired on an Indian ship that followed their procedures and was given prior Iranian clearance to pass The sad truth is even ships that play along can’t really trust Iran to let them through safely at this point

251

FudgeAtron May 6, 2026 +97

>The sad truth is even ships that play along can’t really trust Iran to let them through safely at this point This was exactly the reason international law banned tolling straits.

97

scrotumscab May 6, 2026 +65

I'm beginning to think international law is just suggested guidelines

65

No_Good_Cowboy May 6, 2026 +67

All law is a suggestion. It needs enforcement to really work.

67

Shoot_from_the_Quip 6 days ago +9

I mean, the US Constitution clearly spells out in the 14th Amendment that an adjudicated insurrectionist (which Trump is in Judge Wallace's 100+ page ruling in her case in Colorado) cannot hold office. Yet they let him. Literally the law. Literally enforced previously. But now? Crickets.

9

Mercurial8 6 days ago +4

Depends on your arsenal: I personally would do poorly if I tolled a straight ( slingshot + small rocks).

4

HDauthentic 6 days ago +5

The crew of any ship named Goliath would quake in their boots

5

Mysterious-Lie-1944 6 days ago +3

International law is more of a mutual agreement than rules that must be followed. "I don't want you to do this to me so I agree not to do it to you"

3

Duchess0612 May 6, 2026 +6

Here, there be pirates…!

6

lost_horizons 6 days ago +1

Happy cake day!

1

Wollastonite May 6, 2026 +11

What's the name of the ship? I want to know more about this specific case

11

itsFelbourne May 6, 2026 +18

The *Sanmar Herald* The audio of their communications was also leaked; a crew member says “you gave me clearance to go, I’m second on your list!” and pleads with the IRGC to stop attacking them Indian summoned the Iranian ambassador afterwards

18

kananishino May 6, 2026 +5

Wasnt that after they reclosed it and it was in mid transit?

5

itsFelbourne May 6, 2026 +12

It was when Araghchi declared the strait open and the IRGC denied his statement But Indian ships had been allowed to transit even before that while the strait was still ‘closed’

12

Maximum_Curve_1471 May 6, 2026 +4

This was two weeks ago?

4

ztwizzle May 6, 2026 +28

Part of the problem is that cryptocurrency scammers posing as Iranian authorities are [sending fake messages to shipping companies requesting payment in bitcoin or tether](https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/crypto/articles/fake-iranian-officials-target-stranded-145120334.html). At least one ship has been fired on by Iran after paying a scammer and receiving fraudulent clearance.

28

az78 May 6, 2026 +190

The problem is that Iran doesn't have a functional command structure at the moment. Some parts of the government make announcements, hoping that other parts honor it. They might. Or they might not. Contrast with the United States, where you have the same of uncertainty, but it's all because of one dude's dementia-driven mood swings.

190

A_Soporific May 6, 2026 +11

Just ask Azerbaijan. Iran never wanted smoke with them, but some IRGC commander up there certainly does and keeps on launching drones and rockets at them. I'm sure that they'll eventually punish that guy if they figure out who it is once all of this is over, but that doesn't exactly resolve the issue.

11

scrotumscab May 6, 2026 +51

I guess that's what happens when the chain of command gets assassinated a dozen times over in just a few weeks. Fallout New Vegas taught me one of the biggest strengths of a democracy like the US is that pretty much no matter what happens, we have an order of succession set in stone.

51

MountainTwo3845 May 6, 2026 +9

Fnv taught me to use Boone to assassinate everyone by giving him a .50 cal rifle.

9

HDauthentic 6 days ago +3

Sure, until you get a Battlestar Galactica situation and Linda McMahon is the leader of the human race

3

FrosTxNoVa420 May 6, 2026 +19

Doesn’t feel like a strength knowing who falls upwards when the orange shite is finally flushed out of existence.

19

scrotumscab May 6, 2026 +10

I was imagining a time before drag queen hitler

10

MercantileReptile May 6, 2026 +1

Also quite an important lesson people like Trump and his cabinet have never learned: It pays to have someone to talk to. Rather than murdering anyone looking even halfway important or capable.

1

FlexFanatic May 6, 2026 +5

I need people to start putting dates on these statements. Is this a new incident or the incidence they happened a few weeks ago?

5

LongfellowSledgecock May 6, 2026 +4

I believe this was done intentionally to prevent insurance companies from covering the ships. Even if all the governments of the world say its safe, these ships still aren't going through without insurance.

4

nishitd May 6, 2026 +62

that's the question innit

62

Accurate_Neat_355 May 6, 2026 +60

>Only ships that have registered with the Iranian Maritime Authority and paid the "Regional Stability Fee" (the Toll) are granted "safe passage." >Ships from the U.S., UK, and Israel are still explicitly banned.

60

BlazinAzn38 May 6, 2026 +12

Ah so a new toll in place that didn’t previously exist so even if it is open it’s open for business which increases costs

12

Accurate_Neat_355 May 6, 2026 +5

Correct. Also know that it leaked from congress that it could take minesweepers about 6 months to sign off on a mine-free strait of hormuz.

5

helen_must_die 6 days ago +2

Where did that quote come from? It's not in the article.

2

Entire-Elevator-3527 May 6, 2026 +1

Was the UK involved? Other than shooting down some drones targeting a shared UK/US-base?

1

Accurate_Neat_355 May 6, 2026 +5

>Other than shooting down some drones targeting a shared UK/US-base? No thats the extent of it im aware of, and the obvious closeness of the allies probably gets considered as 'one enemy' by Iran.

5

BlazinAzn38 May 6, 2026 +1

Which is a smart move from their end “get too chummy with the US and your ships aren’t allowed either”

1

Spinoza42 May 6, 2026 +22

The latter. If ships comply with Iran they can pass. Well, that's the same since the war started. Nothing is happening. Oil is down 10% on pure manipulation.

22

Influenz-A May 6, 2026 +6

The latter you mean

6

Spinoza42 May 6, 2026 +2

Yeah, fixed.

2

SmegmaWarrior0815 May 6, 2026 +3

Don't worry, oil is up 5 of those percents again. The market is stupid.

3

Spinoza42 May 6, 2026 +1

Manipulators don't need a long dip, just a sharp one. Which is why the statements are so outlandish all the time I guess.

1

helen_must_die 6 days ago +1

> The latter. If ships comply with Iran they can pass Do you have a source for that or are you just speculating?

1

schnuggibutzi May 6, 2026 +1

Saw a post on LinkedIn from a company I follow "Hoegh Autoliners" They described the passage of the first of about 4 ships stranded. This was the past couple of days. Ironically their ships "aurora class" are powered mainly on Green Ammonia and not oil.

1

Virtual_Medium_6721 May 6, 2026 +575

Can't wait for another post in 3 hours stating Iran restarted bombarding ships

575

itsFelbourne May 6, 2026 +24

I don’t know if they’ll jump straight to bombing, but I imagine a few ships will eventually try to pass and be turned back when Iran broadcasts whatever it’s new “procedures“ are

24

obxhead May 6, 2026 +102

Preceded by a tweet from Trump

102

Amoral_Abe May 6, 2026 +57

Look, I hate Trump as much as most people, but he's not the only one lying constantly in this conflict. Iran has also been lying constantly too. For example, when Trump posted about how the US was meeting with Iranians for a ceasefire and Iran flat out said they weren't meeting so they weren't sure who the US was meeting with.... well... it turned out Iran was actually meeting with them at that point. However, you can't really trust Trump either. Both sides lie frequently and in this case both sides are highly incentivized to lie because they want opposite things.

57

Ancient-Bat1755 May 6, 2026 +26

Iran government still suckssss. We can love the people wanting democracy and still hold those folks accountable . At home we must do the same and vote.

26

NiewinterNacht May 6, 2026 +44

Maybe he shouldn't have started this dumb war, right?

44

mynamesyow19 May 6, 2026 +28

Maybe he shouldnt have torn up the agreement Obama worked out, that had us exactly where Trump is trying to fumble and bumble back to costing US soldier's lives, Billions of dollars, and wrecking the global economy to get there.

28

A_Soporific May 6, 2026 +2

The biggest problem is that this fucks the US in many more ways than just that. Most of the cost of the war isn't going to be felt in the US, but India and Australia and Europe and Africa. The hit to US diplomacy will last for decades if this continues to the point where it creates a famine somewhere, and the painfully obvious lack of a plan means that it's almost certainly going to continue to that point. Never mind that Trump has been trying to exit the war by simply declaring victory for weeks now. If leaks are to be believed, he just doesn't understand how Iran is still just refusing to knuckle under.

2

Drewpig May 6, 2026 +3

Yeeah theyre lying too, so its ok. Plus they started this shit in the first place amr /s.

3

Peysh May 6, 2026 +7

Close to everything that comes out of Trumps mouth is a lie regardless of what the other party says. He'll lie just to lie for the fun of it, he can't stop himself.

7

BlazinAzn38 May 6, 2026 +1

Yes but I expect Iran to lie I don’t expect the US government to lie. I also expect my government to be smart enough to deal with the situation they started and they’re not

1

StormWhich5629 May 6, 2026

> I don’t expect the US government to lie Uhhh... how old are you?

0

BlazinAzn38 May 6, 2026 +1

Let me clarify, I don’t expect them to lie in this context where it achieves nothing and the truth is visible to the naked eye. Obviously governments have lied forever but usually to the extent the truth isn’t known and it achieves something. The trump admin just lies to lie

1

Harmonic_Flatulence May 6, 2026 +1

You state this as though you are trying to convince someone that both side are lying. You don't need to convince most people. Most people are already noticing that both sides are just spreading their own propaganda and lies.

1

FearlessVegetable30 6 days ago

kidna wild this even needs to be explained. i cant stand trump either but people acting like iranian regime are good people is honeslty laughable. id take trump over them every single day.

0

FlarkingSmoo 6 days ago +4

I don't know many people who are acting like the Iranian regime are good people. They can be bad and it can also be stupid as f*** for Trump to have thrown out the JCPOA and then bombed them with no plan for what to do if they closed the strait.

4

APRengar 6 days ago +1

I'm so f****** sick of "people need to stop saying the IRGC are good guys" when no one in the comment chain has been saying that. It's so f****** annoying and just a distraction.

1

LateralEntry May 6, 2026 +1

It’s really muddled because the diplomats and civilian government in Iran are clearly at odds with the IRGC, so statements from one side can be contradicted by the other

1

Less-Fondant-3054 May 6, 2026 +2

You give it 3 hours?

2

cyclingkingsley May 6, 2026 +162

>Iran's Revolutionary Guard says safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz will be provided after President Trump said he was pausing a U.S. military effort to guide merchant vessels through the strategic waterway. baiting us with the title...

162

succsforever May 6, 2026 +3

Do you see “this is a developing story” at the bottom? They’re not baiting you with anything, it’s probably changing as more comes in

3

[deleted] May 6, 2026 -4

[deleted]

-4

GrimHoly May 6, 2026 +5

If you think the USN is going to lose a ship to the Iranians idk what to tell you

5

A_Soporific May 6, 2026 +2

Anyone can lose a ship to an overwhelming number of close ranged anti-ship missiles. There's a finite amount of defensive fire you can have, and that can be saturated by hidden ground forces. The US Navy is the best. But even the best have limits. And the USN is best when they pick the right fights to take.

2

Thurak0 May 6, 2026 +3

When the two USN destroyers passed the strait, they needed extensive air cover including from helicopters to get through. So maybe you need a realism check. If the Iranian military were not capable, this whole shit war would be really over and the strait would be open.

3

GrimHoly May 6, 2026 +6

Once again, they have extensive air cover from the world’s 1st 2nd and 4th largest Air Forces. I wouldn’t worry about a USN ship with Iran.

6

FanOpening3074 May 6, 2026 +7

the american arrogance is one of it's most glaring weakness, go read millenium challenge 2002 and rethink your assumptions. you're forgiven

7

MendicantBias06 May 6, 2026 +4

People love to use that example while failing to even understand how the US war games. The US strategically disadvantages itself to learn about vulnerabilities. US does not war game like North Korea getting flawless victories perpetually. MC02 had the blue team significantly disadvantaged against asymmetrical attacks. They prepositioned blue ships at the red shore rather than standoff range. The red team was also commanded by a significantly senior and more experienced retired U.S. Marine 3-star general, Van Riper. Van Riper got pissed off when they re-ran the exercise with less constraints on blue team.

4

FanOpening3074 May 6, 2026 +1

he got pissed off because they reran with more constraints on the red team. but ok, ill suppose you are right. why us cant control ormuz them? if us power is so great and they can do whatever. why holding the canal against a underdeveloped excluded and sanctioned country is so hard for a godlike oknipotent power like the us army?

1

MendicantBias06 May 6, 2026 +2

You are absolutely correct, they did also include more restraints on the Red team. Most notably on free play so they could test predetermined systems and operations. This is what Van Riper was most upset about and resigned. As for your Hormuz question, Im curious what makes you think the U.S. cannot or does not. The navy just escorted ships through the strait again. First time since the tanker wars. IRGC, thus far, has shown no capability to hit US warships. Similar to the Houthi’s last year. Could it happen? Sure. MC02 showed technologically dominant militaries can still be vulnerable to asymmetric saturation tactics, especially when constrained politically and doctrinally, and especially in littoral environments like the Persian Gulf.

2

FanOpening3074 May 6, 2026 +1

The Controversial "Reset" Rather than accepting the results, exercise controllers halted the simulation and "refloated" the sunken fleet, resuming as if the initial attack had never happened �. New constraints were then imposed on Van Riper's Red Team: he was ordered to keep his air defenses off, reveal the location of his forces, and accept a helicopter landing without resistance �. Van Riper viewed this as rigging the exercise to guarantee a Blue Force victory and resigned in protest, publicly denouncing the exercise as predetermined. about your US point, so if US is in control why the oil isnt flowing? you see the issue?

1

GrimHoly May 6, 2026 +1

It’s not arrogance if it’s true. Say what you will the US is the undisputed conventional military power of the world. Now can we suppress insurgencies indefinitely? No nor should we keep trying. No conventional army can do that without insane brutality. But let’s take an example. Say the US wanted to completely halt global shipping tmmrw despite the negative effects that action would have on the US. Who would be able to stop them? Genuinely. Russia is bogged down in Ukraine, Iran provides 20% of the oil to China, Europes militaries are a fraction of their former strength so who would actually be able to stop them? The US has more air craft carriers than the world combined. They spend almost a trillion on defense every year. They have 3 of the top 5 airforces, 2 of the top 5 navies, bases across the globe to launch attacks from, old generation stealth bombers that radars STILL can’t hit as evidenced by midnight hammer. I mean they had planes taking out Chinese provided anti aircraft in Venezuela and that wasn’t even the latest gen planes we have. That’s just insulting. Even outside of the shipping scenario, In a conventional fight of the US versus the entire world at once, I don’t think they could win because of the population discrepancies, but the fact that there is a chance they could is absolutely insane.

1

FanOpening3074 May 6, 2026 +1

war is about industry and logistic this arrogance and miscalculation is what is enlarging chinese opportunity window in taiwan.

1

FanOpening3074 May 6, 2026 +1

if us army is so great why not just bomb a new ormuz straight to the south? do that during president Comanche 45 ufc in the white house

1

Bizzerk86 May 6, 2026 +2

Yes, I’m sure we allowed the straight to remain closed because we aren’t worried….

2

Thoughtulism May 6, 2026 +6

These are two separate things. A US naval vessel being able to defend itself versus opening a larger body of water. If the US extended protections to the entire straight this favours Iran due to the economics of using conventional weapons against c**** drones and missiles. Iran can claim they are not attacking the US (rather foreign flagged ships) while costing the US massive amounts of money. That's a perfect situation for Iran.

6

Bizzerk86 May 6, 2026 +2

Yes and the best defense is staying out of the straight and out of range of rockets. There is a reason the blockade has kept its distance.

2

Several_Magician1541 May 6, 2026 +3

Damn, well good thing they have helicopters then huh? Smh

3

Ok-Echidna5936 May 6, 2026 +1

Having additional support is never a bad thing or a sign of weakness lol if the US has more assets it should use them. Because Iran would absolutely do the same thing to contest the U.S. blockade

1

Darthnord May 6, 2026 +46

Can we get an entry for Strait of Hormuz on downdetector.com ? Shit has worse uptime than GitHub

46

distinctidiot May 6, 2026 +170

We're back to Schrodinger's Strait! Edit: grammar

170

endgamer42 May 6, 2026 +34

i offishially declare le schdrodinger's taint CLOPEN

34

Adorable_Salt_7145 May 6, 2026 +4

schrodingers straight, schrodingers war, schrodingers peace treaty

4

SlumdogSkillionaire May 6, 2026 +9

It's a Heisenwar. It's in all possible states unless Congress decides to observe it and force a waveform collapse.

9

StunningGold8030 May 6, 2026 +3

Stoogentrump

3

Petelah 6 days ago +1

The strait is aladeen.

1

xmuskorx May 6, 2026 +65

iran must have learned they can manipulate markets too

65

siesta90 May 6, 2026 +20

They have known this for a long time.

20

MelangeBot 6 days ago +2

At this point the Trump regime and whatever is currenlty the iranian regime after assinations have become business partners in the business of oil future manipulation. Trump his cronnies are making good money, they are making good money and "somebody" is collecting 1M per ship. In Alberta and Texas they are dancing on the streets that oil is booming again and China is petting themselves on the back for installling so much solar and build so many EV's. So everybody is happy. (except for people with a ICE vehicle) Those "business" man are loving it, so get used to this becoming the new normal till the oil future market completely stops reacting to their manipulation. As everybody catches on to the patterns, their profits deminshe as other traders also put in the same trades as them. Eventually this cancels everything out and the scheme stops working. We will see how far it will go. I could see Trump desperately tweeting that a nuclear bomber is on it's way to explode all iranian oil or something. That might be the last time the market moves on it. After that I think Trump will go back to pretending to invade Greenland and he is also planning to blackmail and extort all of Cuba. But for now these oil future markets are making them billions of dollars every week.

2

Federal-Tax4314 May 6, 2026 +38

Open, Closed, Open, Closed, Yawn.

38

fafatzy May 6, 2026 +14

Green light red light

14

UpsyDowning May 6, 2026 +2

Clopen…

2

itsFelbourne May 6, 2026 +72

Marine traffic isn’t budging. Last time several dozen ships were underway towards the strait immediately following their announcement of the strait being open Doesn’t seem like anyone is eager to trust the IRGCs word after the last time they “opened the strait” and then turned back every single ship

72

CarRamRob May 6, 2026 +33

It’s open if you pay them their $1M per ship toll. The same way it’s been open for 2 months.

33

MajorMess May 6, 2026 +27

It's OPEN but you WILL get shot at if you pass

27

riko77can May 6, 2026 +1

It was never closed!

1

Wurschd May 6, 2026 +10

Is this Groundhog Day?

10

Diligent_Plane_9526 May 6, 2026 +1

Day Groundhog this is!

1

Escape-artist-43 May 6, 2026 +10

Stonks 📈

10

BringbackDreamBars May 6, 2026 +19

>"With the end of the aggressors' threats and in the shadow of new procedures, **the possibility of safe and sustainable passage through the strait will be provided,** Let me guess, step one starts with paying up to the tollbooth agency?

19

Tight-Courage-3182 May 6, 2026 +3

They’ve created an entire Persian Gulf Strait Authority. Ships can mail them and get clearance, after paying the toll

3

Tannerd101 May 6, 2026 +7

Im getting whiplash

7

Amoral_Abe May 6, 2026 +7

"With the end of the aggressors' threats and in the shadow of new procedures, the possibility of safe and sustainable passage through the strait will be provided," it added, without specifying the new procedures. uhhhh.... that statement isn't the most clear. Also, both Iran and the US are blockading the strait for different reasons. I'd imagine Iran is saying if you follow procedures we lay out we won't attack and it's open but the US is basically saying not to follow Iran's procedures. This is why both sides keep declaring that they have a deal on the table but neither deal looks similar to the other.

7

BravoMikeGulf May 6, 2026 +6

You’re hot then you’re cold You’re yes then you’re no

6

Carbonistheft May 6, 2026 +1

I don't really want to stay, hey I don't really want to go, ho

1

UpplystCat May 6, 2026 +5

Wrong/misleading title. No where in the article does it say "can now pass". Instead it says "Iran's Revolutionary Guard on Wednesday said safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz WOULD be provided, but it was not immediately clear how much the move would reopen the shipping route"

5

PassionInitial7487 May 6, 2026 +5

Any ship that leave the Strait is probably not coming back. If you think just opening the Strait for traffic is going to solve anything, I have bad news for you. Even to this day, ships are still avoiding the Suez due to the Houthis. And even if ships enter the Strait, their insurance premium is going to be so high that it'll most likely affect the oil prices anyway.

5

Abject_Breadfruit148 6 days ago +6

Trump really winning. Everything was moving before his idiotic move with israel. Now things are moving while a toll is paid to iran AND trump has to pay them for the bombing damages.

6

radium_eye May 6, 2026 +3

I wish either party in this conflict were reliable narrators, man, we just do not know what the hell is going on right now at all.

3

abeBroham-Linkin May 6, 2026 +4

Ships can pass, stocks go up! 😁 Ships no pass, stocks go down 😢

4

Catch_022 6 days ago +6

Ships have been able to pass through with the agreement of the IRGC since almost the start of this, so its nothing new. Ships have to get permission, pay a certain fee and pass really close to the IRGC base on the Iranian side of the strait. If they reopen the TSS which used to be used before the war (which Iran mined) and those 800 or so ships can pass through it... that would be a big change.

6

Cote_Goat May 6, 2026 +12

Churlish

12

tackle_bones May 6, 2026 +8

This post title is disingenuous, and the post should be taken down. To clarify, Iran has been “facilitating” passage the whole time, and they have indicated no change to their toll system. This article provides no updated information.

8

Groovychick1978 May 6, 2026 +3

"We appreciate the cooperation of captains and vessel owners operating in the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman regarding transit through the Strait of Hormuz **in accordance with Iran's regulations, as well as the satisfactory participation of vessels in regional maritime security,**" the Revolutionary Guard's navy command said in an online statement." What are the regulations, or the regional maritime security participation?

3

PricedOut4Ever May 6, 2026 +3

Who in the IRGC has the authority to say this?

3

Joshua21B 6 days ago +4

It’s like watching Charlie Brown try to kick a football.

4

steve_ample May 6, 2026 +7

And this shall trigger Trump to declare it's closed. He needs it to be not only open, but open on his own accord and declaration, and Iran to have conceded to every one of his terms as dictated in his unhinged tantrums.

7

jahathebrn May 6, 2026 +5

I long for the days when I had never heard of the Strait of Hormuz.

5

FlyIgnite May 6, 2026 +3

I will see you all in two hours with the "Iran had hit a tanker 4 sailors killed" post

3

A_Credo May 6, 2026 +8

They can pass if they pay the toll. That is their stance. It’s not open. Also, the US is still blockading the Strait, so this post is moronic.

8

Balcke_ May 6, 2026 +2

"It's a nice ship you got, it would be a shame if due something happen to her…"

2

KeyAny3800 May 6, 2026 +2

Iran saying Ships can pass and US saying blockade is still functional. So are ships passing or not?

2

hyterus May 6, 2026 +2

Every day a different story.

2

InfiniteSeat4605 May 6, 2026 +2

Schrodinger's strait.

2

christien 6 days ago +2

this headline is bullshit

2

SmileAggravating9608 May 6, 2026 +3

For what? Another 5 minutes, until the next spokesperson or colonel in the IRGC says or does otherwise?

3

Dark_World_Blues May 6, 2026 +4

IRGC want to control which ships passes through as long as they pay their toll (up to 2 million USD). I imagine they are desperate because the US was able to allow a few ships to pass through the strait while IRGC lost 6 or 7 of their attack boats. The IRGC wants to keep their best card in this war in their hands, and it seems like it keeps slipping from their hands.

4

WTFHELP May 6, 2026 +4

Why did the strait get closed to begin with? Maybe we shouldn't have started bombing them in the first place.

4

Mammoth-AgentEnt 6 days ago +2

Itan just trolling USA. They embarrassed them by letting 'operation freedom' fail and then just open the straight as a power move. I hate the regime, but they're playing USA for chumps.

2

KittySharkWithAHat 6 days ago +2

It's a trap.

2

Funny-Ambition-7631 May 6, 2026 +2

IRGC stands for Islamic Revolutionary Gaurds Corps, the i does not stand for Iran. There is nothing Iranian about this corporation as they have repeatedly shown to prefer Hezbollah and Hamas over lives of Iranians. Media intentionally ignore this since it fits their narrative much hetter

2

BlueFalcon89 May 6, 2026 +1

So we’re back to tolling?

1

Soberaddiction1 May 6, 2026 +1

For how long? A few hours? Until sundown? What about tomorrow?

1

Whiteyak5 May 6, 2026 +1

I'm not entirely sure the IRGC is even in control of their own people anymore....

1

Apprehensive_Art6060 May 6, 2026 +1

Okay that’s good news.

1

epanek May 6, 2026 +1

I feel like I need to ver headlines with “how does this claim impact the stock market”. I feel lies are told to keep stocks higher.

1

reddituseronebillion May 6, 2026 +1

Gas is going to go down... right?

1

Floppy_Jet1123 May 6, 2026 +1

So it's clopen, huh.

1

A_Nonny_Muse May 6, 2026 +1

I'm now imagining an L.A. traffic jam with thousands of 600 foot ships.

1

Substantial_Milk8170 May 6, 2026 +1

How incredibly generous of them to temporarily grant the world permission to use international waters.

1

phycologist 6 days ago +1

The Straits is partitioned between the territorial waters of Iran and Oman. There are no international waters in the strait. Leaving the persian gulf almost necessarily involves passing through Iranian waters for deep-draft ships Like full oil tankers.

1

Holiday_Context5033 May 6, 2026 +1

Can we maintain status.hormuz.com? IRGC and Trump can have admin access to update the status there.

1

wgszpieg May 6, 2026 +1

Chumming the water, are we?

1

Accurate_Neat_355 May 6, 2026 +1

Sharks said its safe to swim

1

DomitiusAhenobarbus_ May 6, 2026 +1

World wide markets are popping off. Well above what they were at before the war. I honestly feel like this particular shit show is over.

1

wtfbenlol May 6, 2026 +1

surely this one will last more than a day, right?

1

mydogsnameispoop 6 days ago +1

This reads as good news so that means something bad is going to happen to stop the strait from opening again

1

Iran's Revolutionary Guard says ships can now pass the Strait of Hormuz

💬 Send a Message

150 Comments