· 97 comments · Save ·
Questions & Help Mar 25, 2026 at 3:39 AM

Is Sora the first real crack in generative slop, and could Suno or Udio be next?

Posted by MusenAI


https://deadline.com/2026/03/sora-shut-down-disney-investment-1236764689/

🚩 Report this post

97 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
drumjolter01 Mar 25, 2026 +178
![gif](giphy|ve5NDutaZXDepgyeCN)
178
IM_KYLE_AMA Mar 25, 2026 +209
Maybe, probably not, who knows? OpenAI is bleeding cash at an insane rate and Sora was a massive cost center with zero (comparative) return. Video generation is orders of magnitude more expensive than audio, so I don’t know that the two are very comparable.
209
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +26
I’m more curious about the deal side of it. Even with all the hype and money around it, something that big can still fall apart. So maybe audio is cheaper and easier to keep alive. But I still wonder how solid those music deals really are long term, versus everyone just trying to control an emerging technology until it’s no longer convenient. Either way, I’m not going to complain if it means less slop to scroll through :)
26
start_select Mar 25, 2026 +10
As someone who has made electronic music and recorded bands and done live sound for 2 decades+, I know when I hear AI music. Just like everyone can hear early autotune and producers can hear modern autotune. It’s flat. Only the lowest common denominator listeners mistake it for human work. In a couple more years they will start to hear the flatness too just like they can hear autotune.
10
shadowromantic Mar 26, 2026 +1
You're right. It sucks but I'm in that lowest common denominator. I've watched videos about how to tell the difference between authentic and AI generated music, but I still can't hear the difference 
1
GarionOrb Mar 25, 2026 +259
Hopefully it's the first of many.
259
Pkolt Mar 25, 2026 +64
It's not even the first, Grok quietly started rolling back unpaid functionality for video generation weeks ago.
64
LitLitten Mar 25, 2026 +7
I remember seeing the waves it made from just browsing here. Fairly certain that something like 80% use cases are for p*** or p***-adjacent content. Highly doubt there’s profitability to what’s already absurdly costly to run, too.  “Cool, how can I use Grok video generation to improve my life?” “It can make unnerving cat-people skits and foot f***** content on whim.”
7
bfluff Mar 25, 2026 +39
I've said it many times before, when the real cost of AI is internalised to users usage rates will drop significantly. It is also not an analogue to companies such as Uber because they're not disrupting and crippling existing industries as much new tech does. The alternative to AI is to think for yourself and people will do that when they have to pay $50 a token.
39
Spaghet-3 Mar 25, 2026 +18
Agreed completely.  The analog to Uber is cost. We’re in the phase of AI analogous to when Uber cost $15 for a 5 mile ride in a black car. When we get to the phase of AI analogous to Uber’s current situation, where it costs $45 to go a few blocks in a beat up old Prius, people will think about AI and how it should be used much differently. 
18
Richard_Sauce Mar 25, 2026 +1
I think massive tech companies will keep text generation alive and relatively free for a variety of reasons, at least one of which is the benefit of telling people what to think rather than leaving them to think for themselves. My guess is that Grok and Gemini in particular are staying put.
1
alexucf Mar 26, 2026 +1
The open models are pretty great now and work on MacBooks. OpenAI and Anthropic could disappear completely and none of this goes away.
1
locus-amoenus Mar 25, 2026 +1
Unfortunately I think the pricing is going to be less of an issue for lay users just using it for chat. Tokens are priced per million and if AI companies priced them high enough to be profit-generating it’d probably be more like $30-50/million. For reference, ChatGPT writing a full-length novel would be somewhere around 200k-300k tokens. It’s really developers who are blowing crazy amounts of tokens. There are individual devs who spend billions of tokens a month running agents. I think a lot of tech companies laying people off en masse because of “AI efficiencies” are gonna have a rude awakening when it gets to a point where using AI is more expensive than just hiring more devs. Hopefully it at least catches up to image gen…
1
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +19
Can’t disagree with that one!
19
BarryLaguna Mar 25, 2026 -1
The sad part is Sora was the best of the bunch when it comes to generative video. I don't know why the others feel they are going to win the market.
-1
wossquee Mar 25, 2026 +10
There's nothing sad about AI video generation going away.
10
BarryLaguna Mar 25, 2026 -4
Awesome reading comprehension
-4
xanderholland Mar 25, 2026 +41
Copilot is also a huge mess right now. AI is rolling down the hill like a wheel of cheese.
41
SoCalThrowAway7 Mar 25, 2026 +2
What’s wrong with it?
2
watabby Mar 25, 2026 +24
I think he’s referring to the Copilot that MS embedded into Windows. Not the one used for coding
24
mcbaginns Mar 25, 2026 -12
Don't expect truth or fact, just sensationalism
-12
Chalupachamp Mar 25, 2026 +11
So, it’s being trained by real world media?
11
we_are_sex_bobomb Mar 25, 2026 +10
The problem Sora always had is that people love making lazy AI slop if it’s free, because it’s addictive to send a prompt and get a video back of The Rock turning into a fruit themed superhero. But it’s mostly amusing because it’s free. And if the technology is free when you introduce it, you’ve immediately devalued it. There’s no apparent pathway to making money with this thing.
10
YungRik666 Mar 25, 2026 +31
Fight slop with slop! There's a guy (i cant find the name) that is flooding Suno with nonsense music to make it even worse at generating music. I wonder if there is a way to do something similar with sora or the others?
31
GiganticCrow Mar 25, 2026 +7
Id love to hear more about this guy. I've heard of people deliberately poisoning AI before but never seen it yield results. Are you thinking of Benn Jordan perhaps? 
7
YungRik666 Mar 25, 2026 +5
I don't think its him. I just saw it the other day I knew I should have saved it... it was a guy who made software that can flood these AI servers. He had a link on the video for others to submit slop and is/was trying to find a way to donate money to music charities or something. He was a younger guy like late 20s.
5
GiganticCrow Mar 25, 2026 +2
If you happen to remember, please let me know!
2
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +3
Probably referring to the guy who flooded Soulseek with Home Simpson's covers? haha [https://www.pcgamer.com/software/ai/a-plague-of-ai-generated-homer-simpson-cover-songs-is-reportedly-swamping-a-popular-music-file-sharing-network-with-the-big-yellow-fellas-dulcet-tones/](https://www.pcgamer.com/software/ai/a-plague-of-ai-generated-homer-simpson-cover-songs-is-reportedly-swamping-a-popular-music-file-sharing-network-with-the-big-yellow-fellas-dulcet-tones/)
3
ZombiePartyBoyLives Mar 25, 2026 +3
> flooding Suno with nonsense music to make it even worse at generating music. That's not how it works...
3
YungRik666 Mar 25, 2026 +2
Im over simplifying it because I cant remember the details. Its something to do with track stems and how Suno learns off of them.
2
ZombiePartyBoyLives Mar 25, 2026 +3
I mean, you might pollute your own account that way if that's what the robot thinks you want, but everybody else's will work the same.
3
dBlock845 Mar 25, 2026 +6
Are any of these slop generators even profitable for the companies? Especially considering the slop cannot be copyrighted by the mega corps who would be the main revenue stream.
6
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +3
Some might be making revenue, but I’m not convinced many of them have a business model that looks great once you factor in compute, licensing, legal risk, and the fact that the output itself can get weirdly hard to own or control. If the economics were obviously amazing, these deals would feel more like real conviction. Instead, a lot of them still feel more like experiments, positioning, or attempts to control the tech before someone else does.
3
ZombiePartyBoyLives Mar 25, 2026 +1
You can absolutely copyright generated music if there was "substantial" human guidance involved. One-prompt slop with AI lyrics, not so much.
1
Notwerk Mar 25, 2026 +20
Here's to hoping.
20
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +4
Cheers, I feel like this is slowly (and rightfully) turning into a celebration thread haha
4
nietbeschikbaar Mar 25, 2026 +5
Oh noes, all those poor pranksters with their Meta glasses promoting a gambling app.
5
Geeseareawesome Mar 25, 2026 +23
Word is already spreading fast. Has the bubble reached critical mass? https://preview.redd.it/i5zt9nfmc4rg1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=27be55b968a0532d7d8d10c96667a93c05faface
23
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +20
Could be. It feels like the mood shifted really fast, and Disney’s move is especially interesting. Suno and Udio are tied to deals that seem much smaller and less public than the Disney situation, so I’m curious to see how that plays out.
20
DeadPeanutSociety Mar 25, 2026 +14
Unlike Sora, Suno and Udio are already producing hits in their medium. AI songs have charted and been successful. I don't think Sora was anywhere close to getting equivalent success because a believable video is harder to produce. I'm not optimistic on this being the beginning of the bubble bursting, so I think that they are unfortunately going to be around for awhile.
14
GameMusic Mar 25, 2026 -22
the video actually works way better than audio and text since video quality is not as subjective have only heard few decent AI songs and nothing incredible but video generally has been surprising to see the quality and the text is just slop actually think the value increases with technical barriers to entry for actual artistry
-22
f10101 Mar 25, 2026 +6
Video *quality* is as objective as audio fidelity or grammar in text. Grammar is perfect in text gen, and fidelity is pretty damn good for audio - definitely not perfect, but with similar telltale artefacts to ai video. The actual subjective element of video is the actual content, the actions, the story, the physics, the lighting coherence. The equivalent of that is the musical/song/production element for music, or the storytelling / structure, etc of text gen. Video is definitely not better than the other two in these respects.
6
GameMusic Mar 25, 2026 -2
well you better inform the entire film industry along with every producer of video production software since they are currently spending orders of magnitude more effort compute money and data for simulation quality
-2
GunterJanek Mar 25, 2026 +1
"spending orders of magnitude more effort compute money and data for simulation quality" and yet here we are [https://www.instagram.com/reel/DU8t8mZj\_8V/](https://www.instagram.com/reel/DU8t8mZj_8V/)
1
GameMusic Mar 25, 2026
on non AI video production people on reddit just read headlines
0
TheXcellence Mar 25, 2026 +10
Imo, No. UMG won their suit and did a deal with UDIO, they're working on a platform together. Audio generation uses less resources than video. Even if the platform is shuttered the technology can/will still be used by UMG, and possibly written into contracts for their artists. Warner and Sony are working thorough their own legal situation as as well. It would be nice to be wrong.
10
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +5
I agree music probably gets absorbed more easily than video. What makes me cautious is that big players have often made deals with new tech not just to support it, but to get close to it, understand it, and keep control of the market around it. That’s why the Disney part is interesting. With Sora, it seemed to go from hostility to partnership, then suddenly to nothing and being shut down. So yes, the UMG and Udio agreement is real. I’m just not sure that automatically means long term belief or long term success, especially if Sora is any example.
5
TheXcellence Mar 25, 2026 +2
Sure, The Music industry has been behind on technological innovation, MP3 sharing and streaming being perfect examples. A.I. was an opportunity for labels not be the tail getting wagged as they clearly see the possible endgame for their business, so they took it. If / when the cost for video generation and other things drops you'll see Sora's pop up. I wouldn't be surprised if Disney built their own, leveraging all of their IP and paying out royalties from the creations. But that could crater their film and TV business as people would have the technology to replicate what they spend billions to make. UMG and the other labels success depends on the willingness of the public to support A.I. generated music, but the technology itself could undercut the industry before they can see the results of their gamble.
2
Autarx Mar 25, 2026 +2
Will people honestly have the time/inclination to make AI films and songs? Like are we talking about millions of people making their own movies, or much like now a smaller group? Because when you start putting AI to work you are going to have to do a lot of heavy lifting to get something to match your vision, not just churn out lowest common denominator visuals and storylines: even with massive advances. In the end are we just going to end up back where we started with small groups of talent people making content that takes time and effort, and if so what is the difference between the current model? Genuine question.
2
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +3
I don’t think millions of people suddenly become real filmmakers or composers. Most people want the result, not the craft. For anything actually good, distinctive, or close to a real vision, you still end up with smaller groups of talented people doing the heavy lifting. Taste and judgment do not disappear. What changes is that making something mediocre becomes much easier and much cheaper. So the real issue is not millions of people making masterpieces. It is everyone having to sort through even more average content. That’s why I think the harder problem to solve will be meaningful curation, not creation.
3
Autarx Mar 25, 2026 +2
Interesting - so essentially like what is happening with the online book market of mass produced AI books?
2
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +2
Yeah, pretty much. Not that it’s identical, but the pattern feels similar. Once that happens, discovery gets worse, attention gets thinner, and the genuinely good stuff has to fight through a lot more noise. I just hope big players eventually start talking more seriously about who owns curation and algorithmic power, but I doubt ethics will win over profit.
2
ZombiePartyBoyLives Mar 25, 2026 +1
And Suno has an agreement with Warner. The majors are looking to get on that sweet, sweet AI "gravy train". The only thing that will kill it is if they decide it's bleeding too much cash, without a viable plan to turn it around.
1
Actual-Anywhere-7405 Mar 25, 2026 +16
I’m so tired of reading the word slop
16
Blackadder18 Mar 25, 2026 +6
I'm so tired of reading it *everywhere.* In relation to AI is one thing, but people just use it as a catch-all term for anything and everything they dislike.
6
noheroesnomonsters Mar 25, 2026 +2
It's a pretty good term for much of the content on the internet these days though, no matter what you like.
2
mootallica Mar 25, 2026
You say it like it isn't accurate lol. 90% of what we consume on the day to day is essentially worthless on an emotional level.
0
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +6
Apparently we’re not gonna use it for long, it already has strong NFT energy haha
6
sybrwookie Mar 25, 2026
One of my favorite things to do to AI bros is to rephrase their praise of AI to be praising NFTs, just like they were a few years ago in the exact same was. Including the part where they exclaim that if you aren't onboard with it, you are dumb/unwilling to learn/being left behind.
0
Patjay Mar 25, 2026 -1
so much slopslop online these days
-1
D0ngBeetle Mar 25, 2026 +8
I hope Suno shuts down so my buddy who only listens to sea shanties (I’m not even joking lol) can stfu about music being replaceable 
8
levilee207 Mar 25, 2026 +1
Bless his salty heart
1
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +7
If something as big as Disney and OpenAI can fall apart, what do Suno and Udio’s label deals actually mean?
7
Falconman21 Mar 25, 2026 +11
Just tells you how bad the economics of it really are. If there was a path to profitability even in the mid to long term, Disney would stay involved. They’ve had or least paid for render farms for years, they understand the economics of big data/compute. Just screams no path to financial viability compared to traditional methods. With music being wildly less expensive to produce traditionally than video, I don’t see it being viable either. I still question the economics of static image generation.
11
OutlawSundown Mar 25, 2026 +6
Heavy video generation churning slop has to be incredibly unprofitable and realistically unworkable for producing a feature length film or even a 30 minute episode. Animation and effects work is still better done hiring people and rolling actual film or digital recordings is more practical that trying to direct AI to give you the result you want.
6
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026
That’s pretty much where my head goes too. If Disney looked at something this visible and still didn’t see a path worth staying for, that says a lot about the business around it. The wild part is that they announced a $1B investment like it meant something solid, and now it sounds like no money may have actually changed hands at all. Even if music is a different category, it still makes me wonder how many of these big AI deals reflect real conviction, and how many are just temporary positioning while everyone tests the waters.
0
Falconman21 Mar 25, 2026 +6
If you’re a publicly traded company, you pretty much had to make some kind of AI “play.” Free stock price bump considering OpenAI didn’t seem like they actually wanted money, just the legitimacy that “deals” with big companies provided. I’ve got a feeling Altman is going to catch a fraud charge once the music stops. Microsoft, Google, the big players were smart enough to sock their money away in data centers that are profitable without AI. They can just flip the switch and go profitable pretty much whenever. But the private equity guys that are fully pregnant in all this are going to take an absolute bath, and are connected enough to make charges appear.
6
Genji4Lyfe Mar 25, 2026 +2
That’s not what the article said, though. It said Disney was ready to invest on their end, and OpenAI pulled the plug, not the reverse.
2
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +1
Even if OpenAI pulled the plug first, that does not mean Disney was fully in or that the deal was truly solid. The same piece also says no money may have actually changed hands and the agreement was never finalized. So there is still a difference between “publicly announced,” “strategically useful,” and “actually real.” That is kind of the part I find interesting. These big AI partnerships can look definitive from the outside and still turn out to be much softer than they seemed.
1
Seinfeel Mar 25, 2026 +5
Well when the Supreme Court ruled that you can’t copyright Ai content earlier this month I think that’s pretty much going to kill it https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-declines-hear-dispute-over-copyrights-ai-generated-material-2026-03-02/
5
apokalypse124 Mar 25, 2026 +3
I don't think that link means what you said above it. Declining to rule on something isn't the same as ruling against it. All it takes is a willing future court to make a judgement. If anything the trump administration probably asked them not to take the case because there's a good chance they would actually rule against it and the administration can't afford to piss off big tech at this point in the game.
3
Seinfeel Mar 25, 2026 +1
> With ​a refusal by the ⁠court to hear the appeal, Thaler's lawyers said, "even if it later overturns the Copyright Office's test in another case, it will be too late. The Copyright Office ​will have irreversibly and negatively impacted AI development and use in the creative ​industry during ⁠critically important years." Idk seems like it’s going to kill a lot of deals if what Ai generates is literally worthless
1
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +1
That definitely feels like a big blow to the whole business model. Maybe not enough to kill it on its own, but if fully AI generated output is harder to protect, it makes the economics of the output look even shakier. And in a way that feels close to the position major labels had with Suno and Udio. Sure, use the catalog and pay us, but the output stays inside the system and gets monetised only in the ways we allow. Sounds kind of familiar.
1
Waltz-In-and-Out Mar 25, 2026 +2
I doubt it.
2
Embarrassed_Love_128 Mar 25, 2026 +2
This is due to a change of leadership, who identified the money problem in OpenAI with too many expense side projects. This is one of those, very cool on paper, boring after 10 minutes. In this time of endless possibilities, a well-designed product that actually fits users' needs is what people want. In fact, the chats are very essential in design, not so cool, but practical and useful.
2
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +1
Yes, that feels plausible. A lot of this stuff was introduced as “look what’s possible,” not “here’s something people actually want to keep using.” Sora always felt much stronger as a demo than as a product. And I agree with the second part too. In the end, people usually stick with tools that fit into real behaviour, not just ones that look impressive for 10 minutes.
1
umotex12 Mar 25, 2026 +2
Sadly no. Suno has business model. You pay them for generating nonsense. Sora 2 had NO business model. Just pure cash burn.
2
Patjay Mar 25, 2026 +1
It's not like sundowning things is new for them. A lot of their model seems to be based around pushing new tech, getting shit loads of investments based on that, and then not being able to figure out how to make standard revenue off of it.
1
Atopos2025 Mar 25, 2026 +2
I feel like this only happened because Iran is using it to make AI videos mocking and taunting Trump. Because I don't feel like any other reason for this makes sense.
2
Sethithy Mar 25, 2026 +2
With the amount suno is spending on marketing it makes me think it can’t be sustainable
2
plamzito Mar 25, 2026 +4
I wouldn’t read too much into it. It’s the insane compute, and OpenAI getting nervous that they’re falling behind Anthropic in the bid for coding AI that the corporate world actually wants and can pay for. There’s also the elusive AGI search, which OpenAI apparently thinks is gonna work out if they only build one giant GenAI app… Apparently, Disney was completely blindsided—they were ready to invest $1B and allow 300 of their characters to be used in shorts. So this is definitely not a case of an old and wise company walking away because it saw no future.
4
Expensive-Swing-2601 Mar 25, 2026 +2
![gif](giphy|39zbpCQocXLi0)
2
PenOdd1685 Mar 25, 2026 +2
🤞🤞🤞
2
Atmadog Mar 25, 2026 +1
Well Google for example isn't going to give up on Veo ... This was an Open AI issue more than a video gen issue.
1
compuwiza1 Mar 25, 2026 +1
"Generative" AI doesn't generate, it rips off. They probably realized they were inviting a flood of lawsuits. The others might not get wise until they find themselves in court.
1
Selfish_and_Misled Mar 25, 2026 +1
I crave AI content like plants crave Brawndo.
1
FederationEDH Mar 25, 2026 +1
I just hope that image generation doesn't really go away in a meaningful way. I use it extensively for my D&D and WoD campaigns.
1
Repulsive_Branch4305 Mar 25, 2026 +2
Oh wow, i figured ai was gonna die in the next two years but damn it's happening faster than i thought. YES!!!!
2
BShep_OLDBSN Mar 25, 2026 +1
Hopefully yes. This slop shit waste way too much water and energy to be viable.
1
sssddmm Mar 25, 2026
Please allah please.
0
kkenshiroo Mar 25, 2026 +1
Hopefully so. Generative AI is a waste.
1
blufin Mar 25, 2026
It looks like the AI companies are running out of cash and can’t afford to keep everything going. If OpenAI is under pressure like this then smaller companies are going to get hammered by even worse. It’s likely that only the big hyper scalers like Google, Microsoft and Amazon will be able to survive the cash crunch because of the cash flow from their other businesses. Microsoft may end up buying OpenAI on the c**** if it’s in real financial difficulties.
0
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +2
I remember an interview with Satya Nadella last year where he was basically laughing about spending tens of billions on OpenAI, because Microsoft owns so much of the infrastructure and IP around it anyway. That’s why the hyperscalers always felt safer to me. Even if the standalone AI companies get crushed, they still sit underneath the whole thing. If the cash crunch gets worse, they’re probably the ones who end up owning even more of it.
2
Golden-Owl Mar 25, 2026 -1
This is all a corporate numbers game, which we don’t know the numbers of Sora got shut down because it proved unprofitable. That’s it. The others will do the same if the situation follows. All on the consumers and numbers
-1
MusenAI Mar 25, 2026 +1
Or maybe this was also about focus shifting. OpenAI has openly said it was spread across too many products, and now they’ve also gone deeper into government and defence work. So Sora getting cut does not necessarily mean AI video is dead, it could also mean they decided other priorities mattered more maybe?
1
Golden-Owl Mar 25, 2026 +1
Possible. But that still remains the same point. Sora didn’t earn enough to be worth keeping over other projects.
1
sybrwookie Mar 25, 2026
None of it is profitable. They're all hoping if they keep chucking money into the money pit, it'll eventually get there. But if it was simply, "it's unprofitable, shut it down," all AI would be gone.
0
← Back to Board