· 134 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 8, 2026 at 7:23 AM

Israel backs Trump's two-week pause on Iran strikes, says Lebanon excluded

Posted by BinaryWolff



🚩 Report this post

134 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
ghostbannomore 3 days ago +2177
Pakistan stated it did include Lebanon, doesn’t instil confidence this ceasefire will last long.
2177
concerned_seagull 3 days ago +297
We back this agreement. Well, only the bits we want to back. 
297
ash_ninetyone 2 days ago +54
"Let's cash in our positions, and set ourselves up for the next round of economic instability to profit off"
54
tempest51 2 days ago +12
The agree to disagreement
12
Morgannin09 2 days ago +12
We agree to your terms in the parts where you give us everything and not the parts where we give you anything.
12
EditingAllowed 2 days ago +6
We only have enough interceptors left to deal with Lebanon.
6
[deleted] 3 days ago +305
[removed]
305
kraftdinnerwithsalsa 3 days ago +106
I will wake up in the morning to news the cease fire has been broken let’s be real here
106
Sometimes-funny 3 days ago +58
Remember when trump made peace in the middle east and then the next day Israel started bombing Palestine again. Lol
58
Fortune_Silver 2 days ago +10
I do not trust a single side in this conflict to stick with the ceasefire. Hopefully I'm proven wrong, but what I've discovered about being a cynical b******, is I have a depressing tendency to be right all the time.
10
olssoneerz 3 days ago +85
Just needs to last long enough for Trump’s buddies to cash out from yesterdays play and buy in their next positions.
85
Teyanis 2 days ago +2
The real two reasons Trump is happy to participate in this war are stock manipulation, since his old tactics weren't working anymore and he needed a more extreme solution, and the good old military industrial complex wanting a lovely excuse to sell new munitions in bigger numbers. Its no coincidence that the US has a good, lengthy war every 15 years or so. Weapon production slows down after conflicts slow down, so they need a new one to have an excuse to spin production back up. Its also one of the ways we subsidize them to develop newer and fancier weapons.
2
twitterfluechtling 3 days ago +22
Well, most shares are up, Brent Crude is down, so the market moved, mission accomplished. No use to wait to strike now to get the market to move again, I expect today, maybe after the stock market closes for the day, attacks will commence to revert the market movement...
22
himalcarion 2 days ago +3
Just long enough for the markets to start to react so the insiders can make a bunch of money again!
3
Big--Parsley 3 days ago +4
Till Friday when the stock market is closed
4
HellBlazer_NQ 3 days ago +3
I love your optimism !
3
physicsking 3 days ago
It was the length of a smoke break
0
EmotionalBag777 2 days ago +32
Ceasefire till Friday after markets close… then before markets open Monday they’ll be another 🫠😵‍💫
32
orsikbattlehammer 2 days ago +3
Oh don’t worry it’s over already
3
Durian881 3 days ago +78
Land grab is probably Israel's objective all this while and getting US to attack Iran was just a distraction.
78
kroxigor01 3 days ago +24
My cynical view is that's the objective of a decent portion of Israel (whether officially sanctioned by leadership or not) at all times since the state existed. There's always maximalists in Israel hoping to confect a war, change "facts on the ground" with illegal settlements, poke neighbours in the eye, etc. in quite a similar way to how the USA expanded piece by piece across the continent of North America (breaking treaty after treaty with native tribes).
24
silverpixie2435 2 days ago +3
Hey when that doesn't happen will you ever admit you are wrong?
3
[deleted] 3 days ago +27
[removed]
27
beatthedookieup 3 days ago +3
Apparently on X they’re saying that Tyre just received an evacuation order from Israel……….hmmmmm
3
TheTrollerOfTrolls 3 days ago +10
Hiding what? This is how rival political parties behave in so many countries.
10
Olivedoggy 3 days ago +3
What are you talking about? The opposition is seething that there's a ceasefire in Iran, but that has nothing to do with the operation in Southern Lebanon. Look at the title of this post. 
3
abellapa 2 days ago +4
Lebanon says it doesnt
4
Arreynn 2 days ago +4
Israel breaking a ceasefire? Say it isnt so.
4
Known-Bath-4903 2 days ago +1
Israel won’t stop, the love killing women and children and destroying civilizations
1
cats_catz_kats_katz 2 days ago -3
You can thank Israel for the current global instability
-3
Lespaul42 2 days ago +1
You were right about one thing Master.
1
spacemoses 2 days ago +97
I wonder if the Trump Admin will be paying Iran tolls for Hormuz with "a pallet of cash in the dead of night". How the turntables.
97
KeyboardGrunt 2 days ago +24
I wonder if maga will see this as funding terrorism.
24
Main_Cranberry_5871 2 days ago +4
Their taxes to the American government have already funded terrorism. We see the result of it in what the US chose to do to Iran.
4
ion-deez-nuts 2 days ago +3
It would certainly be more cost-effective than the $400B in military spending Trump was asking for
3
J-Force 3 days ago +405
If this is the framework for peace (which is a big if of course), the US and Israel will have failed to achieve their war goals: * Regime change (failed, the regime still rules) * Stopping the nuclear programme (partial success, Iran still has its enriched uranium stockpiles to develop a bomb with but obviously they have been set back) * Stopping the ballistic missile programme (failed, if anything Iran has shown its ballistic missiles to be plentiful and effective) * Stopping Iran threatening regional allies (failed, if anything the US has shown how outdated some of its air defence systems are, particularly in terms of defence economics) * Reopening the Strait of Hormuz (failed, IT WAS OPEN BEFORE THE WAR and also Iran still has it in a chokehold) Meanwhile Iran seems to have accomplished many of its war goals: * The survival of the regime (success, the regime still rules) * Deterring attack by hurting the economy (success, they have the world economy by the neck and it has America backing down) * Assert control over the Strait of Hormuz (massive success, they might even get to charge a hefty toll now) There is no possible universe where this ending is acceptable to the current Israeli government. In terms of their own goals, this is possibly the worst case scenario. It is a strategic defeat for Israel; one where the Iranian regime is not just extant but more confident in their ability to choke the global economy as deterrence to future attack than they were before the war. They can and will try to undermine it. I'm sure a lot of MAGA types will see this as a stunning victory the likes of which have not been seen since Caesar, but I can't help but see this as America's Suez. That America does not have the military means/will to open the Strait of Hormuz and could not defend its regional allies from lasting and serious economic harm when it used to be able to do these things will have consequences, not to mention the constant insulting of allies from America.
405
FuguSandwich 3 days ago +169
You forgot the removal of sanctions on Iran. It's impossible to spin this as anything other than a victory for Iran. And the imposition of a $2M transit fee for all ships crossing the strait, which is not only a victory for Iran but a massive loss for the world economy. If the 10 point plan floating around is real, then last nights elation at having avoided WWIII is going to wear off way sooner than two weeks from now.
169
spaitken 2 days ago +24
Not to mention that, as soon as Trump gets wind people are seeing this as an embarrassment on his part, there’s every chance he goes right back to bombing Iran.
24
Sapper12D 2 days ago +21
>And the imposition of a $2M transit fee for all ships crossing the strait, which is not only a victory for Iran but a massive loss for the world economy. I mean some of those boats carry 3+ million barrels of oil so its less then a dollar a barrel. Yeah a victory for Iran but I dont know its all that harmful to the world economy.
21
Raise_A_Thoth 2 days ago +14
$1/barrel at $100/barrel oil prices is a 1% tax. The higher the price of oil goes the less that tax matters but the more we still have massive supply shortages. The lower the price goes the higher of a tax burden that becomes for the overall price which still has an inflationary pressure. It's a relatively small cost compared to the value of the product they hold, but it's still significant and didn't exist prior to this war. Iran is at least smart to try to use that as a way to recoup some of its damages and losses from this war that the US started.
14
stonk_fish 2 days ago +3
Well it's not a lot objectively but they did say they will demand it in yuan or crypto which means all ships have to deal with that + coordinate with Iran's government to be allowed to pass.
3
soggit 2 days ago +5
If they’re able to start charging fees for passage then sanctions have less power Also why stop at $1 a barrel? Why not charge $10 a barrel?
5
Sapper12D 2 days ago +11
I dont know WHY you completely changed your comment. You specifically mentioned passenger ships previously and your second sentence was concerning the embargo. Im not keen on talking to someone who completely changes their comment to make people who reply look off topic. Its bad faith. I will be blocking you, Im not having discussions with people who act like that.
11
DarthPatches_Returns 2 days ago +3
This is how people argue on Listnook, they just keep changing their argument lol
3
Nanofeo 2 days ago +5
Nobody agreed to that
5
ken_the_boxer 3 days ago +54
It's called: gave up.
54
Pat-Funny-2817 2 days ago +6
it's called strategic cluster f***. they cannot "win". what they want is impossible. 
6
CaseOk294 3 days ago +24
I agree. This is simply too humiliating for Israel to accept, not only that, annulling all the gains Israel made since HTS took over Syria. I mean... I thought Iran's chance as a regional hegemony is completely finished when it had ended that way... and here we are. This peace will not last, even if agreements are made. Iran must know that if the 10 point demands are agreed upon that's because its counterparties are thinking 'fine. I'll break the accord later'.
24
J-Force 3 days ago +26
> annulling all the gains Israel made since HTS took over Syria. I mean... I thought Iran's chance as a regional hegemony is completely finished when it had ended that way... and here we are. Same. Iran at the end of 2025 looked very weak, and I'm sure that's one of the reasons the US and Israel decided to attack now. And the loss of proxies *is* an enormous blow to Iran. But Iran has unfortunately shown that it doesn't really need its proxies any more to get what it wants because their own military can choke the global economy at will and the US can't stop them like they could in decades past. That's a very dangerous state of affairs.
26
SeaworthinessSome454 2 days ago +2
If they’re willing to trade the proxies, nuclear program, parts of its missile program (the real long range ones), and just be content becoming a very rich country, this was a successful war all the way around. If $1/barrel (or even a little more than that is the cost of having Iran be happy and comfortable enough to keep to themselves like smothering saudis then I’ll take that deal.
2
bruhbruhbruhbruh1 2 days ago +1
Missing: Caesar Salad Last seen: 5 seconds after plating
1
Virtual-Squirrel-725 3 days ago +974
There are so many red flags within hours of this announcement. Pakistan saying Lebanon is included and Israel saying Lebanon is excluded in one big bright flashing red light. My money is on Israel finding a way to bomb Iran at just the right time to derail any real peace talks....like the last 5 or 6 times. We all know Israel does not want an end to this war....ever.
974
FenixOfNafo 3 days ago +176
You mean so many ways for insiders to bet on polymarket *
176
SnooCauliflowers3235 3 days ago +25
Too much of winning 
25
Mother_Antelope_4358 3 days ago +63
Trump would probably thank Israel for that. It seems that he has absolutely no idea how to get out of this war without accepting a defeat - which this idiot would never accept. So he would probably be very happy to continue bombing Iran after they just ignored his threats.
63
theaddict7 3 days ago +26
I can see an out for him. I actually mean it when I say he's going to change the definition of "regime change" in his next press conference, claim victory and move on.
26
jazir55 3 days ago +26
He already did that one with Venezuela, Rodriguez was the Vice President lmao
26
Mother_Antelope_4358 3 days ago +6
I don’t think that the Iranian regime will let him get away with that. They lost a lot of their military capabilities and large parts of their leadership. They will do everything to publicly frame the current outcome as a massive victory and loss for Trump. Trump won’t be happy with that. I currently don’t think that this will be the end of the war.
6
HotSauce2910 2 days ago +4
If they get a good deal for themselves, they’re not going to sabotage Trump’s domestic efforts to sell it tho
4
Mother_Antelope_4358 2 days ago +3
The only good deal for the Iranian regime is to be seen as a w*****. Everything else would further weaken their power. They will make it very clear that they have control over the strait of Hormuz and that Trump had to meet their demands, I don’t think that trump can live with that.
3
jazir55 3 days ago +37
I want whatever drugs people who believe Trump will actually allow Iran to control the strait and impose a $2M fee per ship are on. Badly.
37
swizzcheez 3 days ago +60
If President Pirate gets a fat cut, I totally believe he would encourage Iran to toll the strait.  Doubly so if Trump personally profits.
60
SuperVaderMinion 3 days ago +6
Given that he was responsible for killing 200 schoolgirls as well as a massive chunk of Iran's high command, I can't imagine they'd be inclined to be charitable to Trump at this point lol. Maybe six months ago.
6
the_fabled_bard 3 days ago +7
Killing children and killing competing high command is something the crazies in charge of Iran are willing to do or at least welcome any day of the week. Don't go assuming that what makes sense for you makes sense for them. Lots of people there just got promotions and raises.
7
Virtual-Squirrel-725 3 days ago +5
Well he has released the pressure before getting an assurance they won't so let's see what washes out in the negotiations.
5
musci12234 3 days ago +8
My logic is that crude is at 95. Let's say Iran is able to streamline their process. Crude might fall to 80-85. If conflict starts again and supply goes down and maybe more production gets impacted then crude might reach let's say 130. Trump isn't choosing between "let them control strait or don't let them". Trump is choosing between "low prices soon or US's image and power in long term". Trump cares a lot about the first thing because failure there would mean that possibly getting impeached.
8
dancing_by_myself0 3 days ago +7
>I want whatever drugs people who believe Trump Stupidity is not a drug
7
Aromatic-Teacher-717 3 days ago +10
What's he gonna do to stop them? Cuz bombing them doesn't seem to be working. 
10
SuperVaderMinion 3 days ago +10
To me, it seems like his "best" options are literally invade the country and take direct control of it, which would result in tens of thousands of American deaths and put the final nail in the coffin of his presidency a mere 16 months in, OR admit defeat and give Iran what they want and hope they can renegotiate the strait further down the road. I'm dubious he'd pick the second option given his ego/blackmailing from Israel.
10
Aromatic-Teacher-717 2 days ago +3
Well, at least Kamala Harris didn't start a war with Iran Plus she had a funny laugh.
3
jay6432 3 days ago +3
Say they humor Iran and allow them to control the strait, you’ll very quickly see pipelines constructed and 20% of the world’s oil will no longer pass through the strait. You think companies will allow themselves to be taxed like this and just take the economic hit?
3
ski_it_all 2 days ago +3
This x100! The whole world now views Iran as a bigger threat than they did before. Every defense contractor in existence just got decades of stimulus to develop next gen anti drone tech and more economic ballistic missile deterrence. Every nation is now incentivized to support efforts to bypass the straight be it pipelines or renewable energy sources. Iran has never pulled the trigger on threatening the straight for all of these reasons, as the world was OK with the status quo as long as they behaved.
3
Aromatic-Teacher-717 2 days ago +2
They'll just build pipelines!!! Yeah, in how many years? Also, if Iran is belligerent enough, it's easy to f*** up a pipeline. 
2
jay6432 2 days ago +2
You know how much money oil states / oil companies have to play with? How hard is it to import c**** labor? You know how China and other countries quickly build massive infrastructure & stadiums for the Olympics & World Cup in 12-18months? It’ll be exactly the same as that. Multiple countries have security agreements with Ukraine for air defense & drone interceptors now, which will change things in the future. And if Iran fucks with a pipeline, that’ll open the flood gates to just smash the shit out of Iran again.
2
Aromatic-Teacher-717 2 days ago +2
Yeah, because smashing the shit out of them is working so well this time. Look, money isn't the only factor. There's a point at which adding fingers to pies doesn't actually make things more effective or quick. There's a bottleneck, like... an LNG refinery was hit in Qatar, Qatar is rich as shit but they said it'll take five years to get capacity back
2
jazir55 3 days ago +3
He has no solution, that doesn't mean he's just going to roll over and let them charge $2M. I'm sure he has a lot of extremely bad ideas he's batting around and will commit to one of them.
3
Desi0190 3 days ago +4
Incorrect. Israel wants the war over when their enemies are at their weakest.
4
EasterZombie 2 days ago +2
My only hope is Trump being so bored with this war and so upset that he isn’t getting the love and praise of his base that he just says “welp the cease fire was with the USA not Israel that’s their problem” if Iran starts bombing Israel again in response to their continued aggression in Lebanon.
2
MVIVN 3 days ago +22
The only real solution is for America to divorce Israel and let them fend for themselves. If they want to continue warring with every other country in the Middle East, they can do so at their own peril, using their own people and resources. Unfortunately Israeli agents are so deeply embedded in US politics (on both sides of the political spectrum) so there’s virtually no chance of that ever happening.
22
Prestigious_Load1699 3 days ago +19
Israel does *not* war with every other nation in the Middle East. See Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, etc…
19
SuperVaderMinion 3 days ago -1
This is also literally the only way you would ever create a two state solution between Israel and Palestine. David Miller talked about how America always acted as Israel's lawyer during any negotiations between them, therefore Israel was never expected to make any reasonable concessions. You take away Israel's guard dog, I imagine they would be a lot more inclined to seek peaceful solutions and create happy neighbors.
-1
adamgerd 3 days ago +20
What’s the peaceful solution possible with Hezbollah? Hezbollah doesn’t even listen to the Lebanese government, they only listen to Iran. So even if Israel and Lebanon make an agreement, Hezbollah has no reason to follow it. Hezbollah ignored both the 2006 and 2025 agreements where it was supposed to move north of the Litani river and gradually disarm. What’s stopping them from ignoring yet another agreement? Lebanon isn’t going to enforce anything on Hezbollah because it doesn’t want to risk a civil war, and frankly it’s a good question whether the Lebanese army or Hezbollah is stronger
20
The-Board-Chairman 3 days ago +2
They'd be doing the US a favor honestly, because as it stands, Trump basically capitulated to the IRGC. Starting the war like he did was stupid, but not finishing it and capitulating like that is more or less the worst defeat in US history. It will essentially wipe out the last 70 years of US foreign policy in the region and a significant part of their credibility world wide. Without control over the Near- and Middle East, the Petrodollar will be a thing of the past and with that will go the Dollar and the US economy as a whole. That might have been surviveable in the 70s, but not today.
2
Sens1r 3 days ago +5
Eh, it's all just words for now, words from two parties we know can't be trusted. We'll have to wait and see what comes of this before we can have a meaningful conversation about what it means for the future.
5
DoubtSubstantial5440 3 days ago +5
You're not displacing the Iranian regime without a massive ground invasion and you're not getting a ground invasion without restarting the draft.
5
mortemdeus 2 days ago +16
Ah, so this is the "pump" news. I assume Friday night or Saturday is when the strikes will begin.
16
ddrober2003 2 days ago +1
Just wait til Netanyahu decides he won't wait to break the ceasefire and enrages Trump that he did it too early and he lost millions.
1
caodalt 3 days ago +138
Bibi really wishes he could keep bombing Iran
138
Traditional_Drama_91 3 days ago +68
Oh, he’ll keep doing that in some form
68
Aggressive_Chair1470 3 days ago +18
he definitely will.  name one ceasefire under him that Israel abided. 
18
V8O 3 days ago
He's just hoping everyone will be too busy celebrating the ceasefire to interrupt his ongoing annexation of Lebanon. Headlines tomorrow: "Now is not the time to talk about Lebanon lest we risk another flare up in Iran"
0
Datruyugo 2 days ago +6
Lets hit pause on one war, finish the other one, and then in two weeks finish the other guy
6
MourningRIF 3 days ago +15
Hey look, Israel gets to focus on Lebanon for 2 weeks before dragging us back in.
15
wunphatbois 3 days ago +97
israel to continue attacking Lebanon outside ceasefire for the love of the game.
97
Maltiperit 3 days ago +36
Netanyahu will not allow the war to stop. He will undermine USAs efforts. If he doesn’t achieve his goals now it’s not going to happen later due to all the good will they lost
36
thatasianguy88 3 days ago +16
Running low on interceptors
16
Catch_022 3 days ago +25
Interesting how Israeli's invasion of Lebanon is just ignored.
25
Fanfics 2 days ago +4
"We will fully abide by the terms of the ceasefire except the ones that we'd have to do anything different for."
4
gumnamaadmi 3 days ago +10
These mother effers will find a way to ensure this shit drags on.
10
MortyMcMorston 2 days ago +7
Everyone needs to boycott Israel at this point. Buying anything that supports their economy is supporting this nonsense
7
RepulsiveCow5840 3 days ago +7
They're getting bombed rn live though. I was watching tel aviv stream.
7
Boys4Ever 3 days ago +2
Calling BS and likely strike imminent. Likely hoping Iran drops their pants and exposes more leaders to attack yet more will just rise from the pack. Time to recall our troops and leave these holy war fighters to their own accord. Oil won't be c**** and a cost I'm willing to accept because I won't accept at the cost of American lives.
2
VanCityPhotoNewbie 3 days ago +7
SO the ceasefire won't happen then....Lebanon has to be included according to the ceasefire agreements.
7
shermanhill 3 days ago +4
Ah delightful. So little ethnic cleansing is going to keep happening.
4
Far-Iron-4281 3 days ago +8
The one who began the war won't be the one who finishes it.
8
Smartimess 3 days ago +5
If Bibi loses more hair he will not only act like Putin, he will also look like him.
5
doxxingyourself 3 days ago +4
Bibi: Look, we gotta bomb *someone* with all these bones they keep sending us. Otherwise where will we stack them all?
4
AardvarkOk4359 3 days ago +3
Evil b****** would say that
3
StrangerConscious637 3 days ago +2
Do Americans and Israelis even get it, that they are the bad ones now?
2
infraGem 3 days ago +1
Nah Iran is plenty bad by itself. Or do you think they are the good guys?
1
Araminal 2 days ago +5
It's just a sliding scale of bad guys at this point.
5
UnremarkabklyUseless 2 days ago
Iran is not the good guy but Israel and US are the instigators in this current situation. Iran is forced to react and it also highlights why Iran needs nuclear weapons as a war deterrent.
0
Tiaan 2 days ago +1
Lol comments like these are just ridiculous.. like do you think this conflict only started a month ago when bombs started falling on Iran? Are we going to ignore the nearly 40+ years of being in a proxy war with the IRGC and their entities across the middle east? It's so easy to tell the people who have no understanding of history in the region based off of the comments that they make. It's the same with people who believe Israel going into Lebanon is different than the Iran conflict.. no, it's a part of the same exact conflict
1
4uk4ata 3 days ago +3
I don't think the cliques in charge of both care.
3
JayPlenty24 3 days ago +2
They need a restock.
2
Ok-Effective6969 2 days ago +2
Let Iran and Israel duke it out, and US can stay out of it!
2
zumera 2 days ago +2
Scumbags.
2
Feisty_Ground7684 2 days ago +2
Ah the Terrorist state of Israel trying to set the terms….gotta love it. USA needs to cut that umbilical cord asap 
2
RedBMWZ2 2 days ago +2
Why the f*** did Trump cave to every single demand Israel makes? Why is he so beta?
2
doublelist87 3 days ago
It’s plain and clear that Netanyahu is calling all the shots in this war and he can do it because he has Trump blackmailed.
0
EmbarrassedCockRing 2 days ago +1
Israel: cool cool, we're still gonna be dicks lol
1
BetSquare7190 3 days ago -13
Neither Iran nor Hezbollah seems willing to renounce their ambition of destroying Israel. There's no reason for Israel to stop the war against Hezbollah.
-13
Dark_World_Blues 3 days ago +15
IRGC cares more about their proxies than the Iranian citizens. They don't care about Lebanon, they care about Hezbo. I don't think Israel will stop because the ceasefire deal is Iran with USA and maybe Israel, not with Lebanon.
15
gringodingo69 3 days ago +6
Particularly when Israel have the ambition of destroying Iran and Hezbollah.
6
BetSquare7190 3 days ago +29
Hezbollah was created specifically to destroy Israel.
29
gringodingo69 3 days ago -3
Have you ever asked yourself why that might be the case?
-3
TheTrollerOfTrolls 3 days ago +19
Because they want to create an Islamic state in place of Israel.
19
BetSquare7190 3 days ago +9
Because they can't stand Jews having a country in their ancestral homeland.
9
gringodingo69 3 days ago +2
Why do you think they hate Jews? They all coexisted in the Ottoman Empire quite happily for a very long time. There were an awful lot of Mizrahi Jews across the whole region before 1948. What happened?
2
infraGem 3 days ago +12
Yeah what promptes the jews to flee from middle eastern countries?
12
Large_Mountain_Jew 3 days ago +12
"Coexisted" is a funny way of saying "Jews were second class citizens far worse off than however people think Israel treats non-Jews." The "happily" part is also a big fat lie.
12
_SirSpacePickle 3 days ago +1
Wow. Go read some history books.
1
yosisoy 3 days ago +3
Why do you think Israel wants to destroy Iran, going by your logic?
3
Loud-Examination-236 2 days ago +1
That's because they don't want a two front war. Iran and Lebanon should just say all is fair and go at them
1
← Back to Board