· 149 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 12, 2026 at 12:53 PM

Israeli bulldozers raze about 50 Palestinian shops ahead of settlement-linked road project

Posted by igetproteinfartsHELP


Israeli bulldozers raze about 50 Palestinian shops ahead of settlement-linked road project
AP News
Israeli bulldozers raze about 50 Palestinian shops ahead of settlement-linked road project
Israeli authorities have started the demolition of some shops built without permits on the outskirts of a Palestinian town in the occupied West Bank.

🚩 Report this post

149 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
AudibleNod 1 day ago +867
>Israel says the demolitions are needed to make way for a road serving Palestinian communities. But Palestinian officials say the road is part of a broader plan to keep Palestinian vehicles off a new highway being built to serve nearby Israeli settlements. [I wonder where they got that idea from.](https://www.history.com/articles/interstate-highway-system-infrastructure-construction-segregation)
867
w33dw1zard420 1 day ago +350
America has always been number 1 in terms of most creative ways to be racist
350
jariuana 1 day ago +59
I’m sure Operation Paperclip helped a bit with that.
59
GruggleTheGreat 21 hr ago +46
The Nazi camp and registration that became the holocaust was copied from the United States and how they treated minorities
46
bauhausy 19 hr ago +21
The Nazi camps were based from British concentration camps against the Boer in modern day South Africa (from 1899-1902), if I’m not mistaken. But the general discrimination and segregation ideas for the Nazis came from the US
21
Guilty-Shoulder-9214 18 hr ago +9
As well as the eugenics movements and policies that were employed in California and a few other states.
9
Bitter_Tea442 17 hr ago +4
And those ideas were pioneered by Francis Galton, an Englishman.
4
Gamer_Grease 20 hr ago +2
It goes back a lot farther than that.
2
ExoticWeapon 23 hr ago +10
It was so prevalent in NASA that I don’t trust any of them today. I just can’t bring myself to. Everytime I look at NASA I think project paper clip and those old *jokes* about throwing a seig heil at Nasa will make the room light up with arms and chants.
10
Healthy-Amoeba2296 19 hr ago -1
I read the history. They found one was a nazi and kicked him out. Nazis abused Von Braun since he resisted selling the army project to them 3 cents on the dollar.
-1
theuncleiroh 6 hr ago +1
Make the blueprint for Nazis. Import the Nazis. Become the blueprint for the newest breed of Nazis, in this case the ones that are perversely enough, a crossroads between the German and American ones (victims of the former, funded by the latter). And have your politics mutated in no small part by the new ones (though that's mostly a product of willing capture, since America is only influenced by israel to the extent that it is happy to be so)
1
exoriparian 23 hr ago +49
How do you think Europe got so rich?  No, this is a drop in the racism bucket.
49
icantbelieveit1637 17 hr ago +12
I mean Europe sucks but America literally practiced Chattel slavery for hundreds of years for cash crops. Not just chattel but extensive breeding programs and institutionalization of slavery. Not even mentioning the civil rights issue America is a little unique in the racism department.
12
sadderall-sea 13 hr ago +7
I feel this minimizes a lot of Europe's role in creating that system in the first place, also the ways Brazil and South Africa c9ntinued it different ways . The US is just a continuation of Europe.
7
exoriparian 14 hr ago +3
You're 100% right and I just wrote that to remind ppl this shit goes deep.  Not at all trying to diminish the depravity of American racism including chattel slavery.
3
w33dw1zard420 16 hr ago +4
Not necessarily the most amount, just being the most cutting-edge and innovative with it in a relatively short period of time
4
exoriparian 15 hr ago +4
That's fair. I just like to remind people. Europe has been somewhat washed against the US because of recency, which is fair, but it's still worth keeping in mind.
4
Pm-mepetpics 11 hr ago +3
It's definitely important to keep in mind so they don't backslide like the US.
3
DogAlienInvisibleMan 18 hr ago +4
Nah we're number 2 at best, the British were on an entirely different level from the rest of the world.  
4
w33dw1zard420 16 hr ago
Arguably we took the crown from them somewhere in the mid 1800’s
0
09f3jns 23 hr ago +8
I can think of a better choice for number 1
8
0thethethe0 1 day ago +36
I'm sure the checkpoints they'll stick along the road are for the good of the Palestinians too.
36
cornnndoggg_ 17 hr ago +5
Absolutely. The moment I read that, my immediate thought was, "this is basically Black Bottom here in Detroit." It's note for note.
5
-Switch-on- 1 day ago +11
Tom Hanks? 
11
AudibleNod 1 day ago +7
He's just a spokesperson for the New Grand Canyon. He's not an ideas man.
7
Sad-Excitement9295 14 hr ago +3
Aha! Serving Palestinian communities? Mossad would shit themselves at the thought, I'm surprised they could bring themselves to say it! Great linked article btw, really shows how this has been going on for a long, long time, and that these tactics are not just being newly invented in Palestine. This is behaivor that is ingrained in these supremacist lowlifes.
3
TheTresStateArea 22 hr ago +635
Bulldozers made by caterpillar, paid for with your tax dollars through their defense contracts.
635
Snowwolf247 20 hr ago +176
F*** The US government.
176
hgs25 19 hr ago +101
The U.S. puts more restrictions on how Ukraine uses aid than it does for Israel.
101
theuncleiroh 6 hr ago +2
Wanna know the easy (not good) answer? Russia has nukes and allies (the former being much more important, realistically). Palestine has neither. In different ways, israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Palestine have demonstrated why disarmament is not a very good answer in an age of imperialism. Ukraine gives up nukes, now can be invaded. Russia has nukes, limits the range of retaliatory measures. israel has nukes (that they all but officially acknowledge), gives them collateral (in a pretty unique way, since no other country ever has, or probably ever will, use nukes as a threat *against their allies* in order to guarantee continued support). Palestine never had nukes, has always been victim. Nukes are not the answer to these things alone, and are objectively bad for humanity. However, you're never gonna convince a place like NK to stop their program, places like India/Pakistan to disarm, or even a country like Iran that they have no right to them. We've seen time and time again that, in a world where countries (primarily, but not only, America) are happy to wage war at the drop of a hat, nukes have a value. You think Maduro would be in a Brooklyn jail if Venezuela had nukes?
2
springsilver 8 hr ago +1
Yeah, but we aren’t paying Zelensky to keep the bed warm for Sky Daddy.
1
Sad-Excitement9295 14 hr ago +15
All about those Hamas terrorists and the nuclear material after all, eh?
15
Melkman68 4 hr ago +1
Thats why Im happy im gone from the US
1
ButtEatingContest 23 hr ago +148
"So you're saying Israel doesn't have the right to exist"? "Right to exist where? Outside internationally recognized borders? No, probably not there."
148
LazarusPizza 13 hr ago +16
Considering how Israel has been acting since its inception, the country should be dissolved.
16
MarauderMoriarty 1 day ago +396
Most moral and democratic nation in the middle east 🙄. Edit: I don't know if it's social media and if it's always been like this, but does anyone else feel like all of these countries (especially Israel) have just become more blatant, where they are like: "*I am doing this horrific shit and there is nothing you can do about it?"*
396
angry-democrat 1 day ago +163
careful, the truth can be antisemitic.
163
ExoticWeapon 23 hr ago +58
Has been since 1948.
58
arul20 23 hr ago +8
I think truth became even more anti-semitic after Oct 7. 
8
w33dw1zard420 1 day ago +78
Something tells me your replies are going to consist of entirely blaming the current administration, which to a large extent is true, and voters, rather than acknowledging the long succession of presidents that allowed and encouraged them to do heinous things but in more relatively secrecy. That is the theme of this administration on many issues, the institutional rot didn’t start with them. It’s just more blatant now.
78
MarauderMoriarty 23 hr ago +62
I think Donald Trumps existence as your president has exposed the world and all of the systems in place for how fucked up they are. Usually they would manufacture consent in some way, but Donald Trump barely made up any excuses/reasons, just the same tired old *"iran no nuke, 2 weeks away from nuke blah blah, oil blah."* Most people are generally ignorant, but not dumb.
62
w33dw1zard420 16 hr ago +3
You could almost say he is doing us a favor by ripping the band-aid off, to the extent that there is any chance of salvaging America over the next 2.5 years.
3
Cute-Percentage-6660 10 hr ago +1
Part of the problem is that salvaging would also involve dealing with people on both sides of the isle from including democratic sweethearts
1
praguepride 23 hr ago +31
There was a period between Netanyahu regimes that a more moderate Israeli party was in power but that is where Bibi’s people sponsoring Hamas and killing off the moderate Palestinean peace movements via assassinations paid off. Both sides have used the violence of the other to justify more extreme positions and this is the end state now where r*** and murder are viewed as the default interaction.
31
MarauderMoriarty 23 hr ago +40
Feels like you are erasing a lot of history here dude. Hamas was a charitable organisation before they became more militant(following the first intifada) and Israel's crimes against the Palestinians existed before Netanyahu.
40
SteveJobsDeadBody 20 hr ago +6
>Benjamin Netanyahu's approach to Hamas involved a long-term strategy of allowing financial and material support to reach the Gaza Strip, aimed at maintaining a division between the Hamas-led Gaza and the Palestinian Authority-led West Bank. The intention, as described by analysts and Israeli officials, was to weaken the Palestinian Authority, prevent a two-state solution, and keep Hamas focused on governance rather than conflict. They really aren't leaving all that much out.
6
sephjnr 1 day ago +18
While they have the US and UK in their pocket they can do what the f*** they want.
18
MarauderMoriarty 23 hr ago +24
It's not just the US and UK, so many governments just ignore it or actively support it. It's worse because their populations are definitely against it.
24
squidlink5 23 hr ago +18
EU trade is biggest. If they wanted they could have put sanctions. They will actively support and send weapons instead.
18
MarauderMoriarty 23 hr ago +6
Yeah, I sometimes feel like the EU doesn't realise the power they have collectively because they don't act on it like they could/should in most cases.
6
bauhausy 19 hr ago +3
Impossible, when the EU’s largest economy (Germany) seems hellbent to support Israel till the very end. However; Spain, Slovenia, Sweden, Belgium, Netherlands, surprisingly Italy, and to a lesser extent France are complaining plenty. Maybe they can force Berlin’s hand
3
Tuesday_6PM 23 hr ago +3
Didn’t the EU just pass sanctions on some of the Israeli “settlers”? That’s at least a start, though they can and should do more
3
bauhausy 18 hr ago +3
EU-wide, it was just sanctions on some settler organizations that promote violence. A few countries went further and imposed full economic sanctions on \*all\* Israeli West-Bank settlements (Spain, Slovenia already did last year, the Netherlands announced it will as well yesterday, while Belgium and Ireland are drafting similar measures)
3
Alocasia_Sanderiana 8 hr ago +1
Mainly just sanctions against groups like the Hilltop Youth and Lahava. Still hasn't sanctioned officials like Itamar Ben-Gvir, [who directly arm these groups with US made rifles](https://static01.nyt.com/images/2023/11/05/multimedia/05dc-israel-weapons-pbzg/05dc-israel-weapons-pbzg-mediumSquareAt3X.jpg).
1
coleto22 16 hr ago +3
And Germany to veto any real EU actions.
3
Briano55 1 day ago +21
Social media has allowed us to see the horrific actions of Israel, they have been doing this for decades. Long term there has to be consequences for Israel, the younger generations (well, anyone under 50) see through their propaganda and realise it is all lies.
21
MarauderMoriarty 23 hr ago +12
I agree, but I was more pointing out that it's all become so blatant, where they are acting like they are untouchable and can do whatever they want. Whether it's Israel or the US.
12
GarbagePailGrrrl 1 day ago +9
It’s always been happening, we’re just in an age where everyone enables each other’s worst behavior 
9
wildemam 23 hr ago -9
That's basically every age. Someone has to be the Nazis at any given time.
-9
-TheExtraMile- 15 hr ago +1
> "I am doing this horrific shit and there is nothing you can do about it?" You are right and maybe it's time for a large part of the globe to take some kind of action. We are many, the war mongers are few at the top. I think we need a new revolution.
1
[deleted] 21 hr ago -7
[removed]
-7
SteveJobsDeadBody 20 hr ago +11
There's nothing moral about Israel. It's a settler colonial state founded on ethnic cleansing that commits acts of terrorism regularly. Imagine Iran did Stuxnet to Israel, it would be called terrorism. Imagine Iran did the pager explosives thing to the IDF, it would be called terrorism. Those things would be called terrorism because they were terrorism. Done by terrorist state Israel.
11
deannickers 23 hr ago -57
Wait untill you find out that way worse stuff is being comitted by larger countries on a larger scale. Its always been this way but for some reason Israel is responsible? Why would you single Israel out among them?
-57
MarauderMoriarty 23 hr ago +42
Because Israel is the topic of the article... Also I am talking about how blatant countries are being, obviously all countries have committed atrocities. If we're talking about Israel specifically, they have committed atrocities that are heinous and comparable to the larger countries you are hinting at. However, the blatantness and how we are expected to not speak about it, like you are doing now is the reason people single out Israel.
42
DoofDilla 23 hr ago +26
I single out Israel because they are constantly bragging about being the only democracy in the middle east, having the most moral army in the world and i take them by their own word and hold them accountable to their self set standards. Also because they never admit any wrongdoing and have a bag full of moral justifications ready for whatever atrocities come to light.
26
exoriparian 23 hr ago +22
Complete load of shit.  Where are these atrocities you speak of, and are we giving them billions of dollars and thousands of bombs to do genocide with?
22
deannickers 23 hr ago -6
What genocide are you talking about?
-6
LazarusPizza 13 hr ago +5
Israel's genocide of the Palestinians
5
exoriparian 23 hr ago +19
And blocked.
19
Antique_Eye_3200 23 hr ago +32
Because Israel and an example of its recent actions is what this particular article is about? 🙄
32
deannickers 23 hr ago -26
Is the article about atrocities or is it about building a road that cannot be confirmed to either help or hurt Palestinians?
-26
Agitated_Celery_729 23 hr ago +35
Please show us an example of a road Israel has built to help the Palestinians.
35
voidox 11 hr ago +2
also another point to that ask that genocide defender, what right does Israel have to build anything in the West Bank area? it's not their land under international law, but of course the israel defenders act like it's all Israel and they have all the right to do w.e they want.
2
[deleted] 23 hr ago -14
[removed]
-14
crash_bat 22 hr ago +20
Do you consider the Palestinians as fully human? Do you think they should be allowed to govern themselves?
20
Condottiero_Magno 21 hr ago +12
Who built those buildings that are getting torn down? Extraterrestrials?
12
untamedlazyeye 20 hr ago +8
Impressive levels of racism/delusion considering to build the road, they have to demolish buildings built by Palestinians.
8
codroipo_townhall 8 hr ago +1
Ahh I was almost missing the daily dose of whataboutism.
1
DarkArtHero 23 hr ago +126
If war crime was a country
126
ArbitraryMeritocracy 21 hr ago -6
What is their end game, who else are they going to go after being the aggressor against 7 countries?
-6
FaerieKnotz 20 hr ago +4
"Oh, you sweet summer child."
4
Beardmanta 20 hr ago -44
>Israeli authorities said the buildings including car washes, scrap metal shops and vegetable stands were built illegally and owners had been warned for “several years” enforcement was forthcoming. The war crimes 😭
-44
Maleficent-Clue5056 20 hr ago +39
oh as long as the Israeli state says it's okay!
39
4everbananad 23 hr ago +89
f*** genocidal israel
89
AlwaysTheMore28 20 hr ago +39
Israel is committing some horrific combination of war crimes and genocide. Some of the most evil people on Earth right now
39
UBC145 23 hr ago +39
F*** Israel and anyone that supports them
39
YetAnotherWTFMoment 12 hr ago +3
And people wonder why....
3
argent_pixel 8 hr ago +4
Slow motion genocide and the west continues to let it happen because they're bought and paid. Utterly pathetic.
4
QuailBrave49 1 day ago +51
I heard of the greater Israel project. Sounds like a conspiracy theory, but when you think of it keenly, it starts to make some sense.
51
Anary8686 23 hr ago +67
Smotrich (minister of finance) talks about it all the time, it isn't a conspiracy.
67
exoriparian 23 hr ago +16
It *is a conspiracy*.  Mentioning it *isn't a conspiracy theory*. There's a difference.
16
Drabulous_770 23 hr ago +96
It’s hard to call it a conspiracy when Israeli officials talk about it publicly.
96
Hesitation-Marx 23 hr ago +25
Hard to call it that when there was a covert base in Iraq.
25
PrettyCreative 22 hr ago +16
And are acting on it.
16
Goldenrah 20 hr ago -1
It is still a conspiracy in its original meaning. A conspiracy doesn't need to be secret, while a conspiracy theory is about something that is being kept secret from the public you think is resulting in certain harmful actions.
-1
Sad-Excitement9295 13 hr ago +1
Yeah, exactly, per definition: Conspiracy: to work together to commit a crime. Unfortunately people don't realize "conspiracy theory" was a term that was given a fake meaning by these people, and now everyone just uses it to refer to the UFO/Lizard group that believes a bunch of insane stuff (probably pushed by the very same people that commit these secret crimes to make any accusations about them false). The CIA worked on this stuff back in the day, they still do, and so does Mossad. Not a theory, a conspiracy fact.
1
QuailBrave49 23 hr ago -8
That’s said in whispers if you want to stay on the safe side of things.
-8
exoriparian 23 hr ago +25
Netanyahu himself has talked about it openly.  It's not even a question.
25
Arctic_Chilean 22 hr ago +6
Not surprising as now there's been a *lot* more talk about the Israeli-Turkish tension and potential conflict. Like someone is trying to create some manufactured consent around the possibility of Israel getting into a conflict with a NATO member, a scenario that will inevitably break the alliance and rip the US away from it. 
6
FaerieKnotz 20 hr ago +2
By keenly, do you mean think-wail with such a horrifying and devastatingly loud cry, that it stops two opposing armies, mid battle?
2
QuailBrave49 20 hr ago +1
A creative pun, but by 'keenly' I meant looking closely at the logistical expansion of infrastructure. It’s hard to ignore the physical reality of projects like this, regardless of the 'wailing' on either side.
1
dFrame3070 22 hr ago +20
When they’re not raping people with dogs they’re bulldozing neighborhoods. Paid for with US tax dollars 😡
20
Embarrassed_Lemon527 20 hr ago +21
Israel has become a pariah state, and my involuntary donations through federal taxes support it.  Funding must be cut immediately after a new Congress is voted in.
21
Sad-Excitement9295 14 hr ago
No taxation without representation.
0
speeddemon266 19 hr ago +11
What a bunch of cunts
11
party_core_ 23 hr ago +31
In b4 the lock Can't have any bad news about "the only democracy in the middle east" getting too spicy, after all
31
ewenmax 21 hr ago +18
In the 1980's in the UK we started to boycott South African products due to their Apartheid regime. Thatcherites scoffed that this would have no impact on consumers, that the only people that would be hurt were the South African workers. In Dublin across the water the women on the cash registers working at a Dunnes supermarket on Union advice refused to touch South African fruits. Nimrod Sajaka exiled in Ireland from South Africa since the 1950's joined the women on their strike. Tree years of strikes finally led to the Irish Government banning the importation of South African goods into Ireland. This action spread like wildfire and exports from South Africa collapsed leading to the South African government eventually talking to Nelson Mandela and his eventual release The link below is an amazing documentary called **Blood Fruit** about the strike, the struggle and the change these women and Nimrod Sajaka created. It is a lesson people need to learn today about how the rest of the world challenges the atrocities of the hard right Israeli government are carrying out. [https://youtu.be/5V-gVA4kahc](https://youtu.be/5V-gVA4kahc) I know it's difficult, as we see so many everyday products that we think are doing no damage, yet here they are supporting the apartheid Israeli government. [Boycott Israel - A Simple Boycott List](https://boycott-israel.org/boycott.html?_gl=1*zl6py7*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTI2MjA2MzA1OC4xNzc4NjAyNTU2*_ga_180PTR07NS*czE3Nzg2MDI1NTUkbzEkZzAkdDE3Nzg2MDI1NTUkajYwJGwwJGgw)
18
Sad-Excitement9295 13 hr ago -2
A large portion of their economy is tech, that's why there's so much PC/Software on the list. Unfortunately our tax money just gets sent over there. Feel free to boycott directly as well. No taxation without representation.
-2
thejodiefostermuseum 20 hr ago +11
If you are from Israel feel invited to explain, Id really like to understand.
11
Consistent-Throat130 14 hr ago +5
It's an ethnostate.  Having given it legitimacy in the first place was a profoundly racist move.
5
Sad-Excitement9295 13 hr ago +1
Isn't Israel as well?
1
datCASgoBRR 8 hr ago +3
Oh hey look, more genocide! So glad that my tax dollars are funding this instead of healthcare, or higher education, or food stamps, or LGBTQIA+ programs, or neonatal care, or housing, or transit, or high speed internet, or f****** ANYTHING.
3
beamish007 19 hr ago +11
Nothing to see here people, move along. Just a little genocide and ethnic cleansing going on here.
11
Blubbolo 22 hr ago +10
The genocidal terrorists state does terrorist things. We as the EU should drop any trading agreement, weapons deal and sanction them as we did for Russia. And on this note : f*** the eurovision.
10
IntelligentGuide4080 19 hr ago +11
I can’t say this enough.  Israelis are the most hateful people I’ve ever met.  Look at Israeli tik tok.  They consider Palestinians to be subhuman—vermin.  They HATE them and do not see them as human.  
11
SpaceChicken2025 14 hr ago +6
Colony* Settlement is the PR term they came up with to try and get around international law and human rights. Israel is building colonies in annexed territory.
6
CosmicLovepats 20 hr ago +8
And Hasbara types will still try to argue that there is no genocide.
8
Ragnar_of_Ballard 20 hr ago +9
Literal f****** nazis...
9
SpeshellED 23 hr ago +11
Why do people hate us ?
11
mysecondaccountanon 11 hr ago +2
Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting country, and I say this as someone from a country that also is.
2
steathrazor 8 hr ago +2
already making plans and destroying property like they didn't exist like the people they murdered to get that area. This war on Gaza and the Palestinians is not a war. It's a genocide you would think Israel would know better
2
Shady_bookworm51 21 hr ago +9
and then they wonder why Palestinians are rightfully pissed off at them.
9
WolfWraithPress 17 hr ago +5
Stop calling it settlement.
5
[deleted] 16 hr ago +3
[deleted]
3
Hieroglo 15 hr ago +8
Ethnic cleansing
8
Traghorn 13 hr ago +2
Thinking Israel is a pariah state isn’t antisemitic - it’s anti-Israel. Israel’s days are short, now.
2
Playful_Wrangler7836 21 hr ago +6
Anyone who deals with this genocidal country is complicit ans should be held accountable by the people. When will everyone realize that one day protests and marches DO NOT WORK. shut down the country for a week and demand change. IMO
6
OkLab6701 15 hr ago +4
Genocidal regime gonna genocide
4
Just-another-weapon 20 hr ago +3
Who would actually want to move to Israel and be part of this absolute shambles. You must have to be pretty extremist individual to still be supporting them after what they've been up to for the last 3 years.
3
Short_Ad_5006 6 hr ago +1
Careful now, you cant report things like this, its anti semitic 
1
dragonslayermaster84 5 hr ago +1
Cool. Keep up the good work. They just released the un-edited truth of the atrocities that Palestinian men committed on October 7. Palestine is going bye bye.
1
Bishopjones2112 21 hr ago +1
I know Jewish people have been persecuted, I know that holocaust happened and it’s all terrible. The past trauma and horrible history does not give ordeal the right to ignore the idea of basic human rights much less ignore Geneva Conventions and laws of armed conflict. Here we still see more of complete disregard for people and their property. I would have hoped a people who were treated the way have would be able to show empathy for humanity but instead they are rapidly turning into the worst of what persecuted all Jewish people. I hope one day to see a world at peace but sadly Trump and Putin and even Israel are showing that won’t happen. Be better Israel, Don’t be next in the cycle of evil.
1
Melted_ICE_5193 21 hr ago +12
The problem is, most of those who suffered in the Holocaust, are long gone. Even their Kids are elders now. And even if that was the driving force, the Palestinians have *nothing* to do with that. They are just a weaker force that can't defend itself the way a Germany can and would if presented with this foolishness.
12
voidox 11 hr ago +2
> the Palestinians have nothing to do with that. yup, in fact something that is often never brought up, look at how Palestinians fought against the Nazis in WW2: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2019-05-31/ty-article/.premium/historian-12-000-palestinians-fought-for-u-k-in-wwii-alongside-jewish-volunteers/0000017f-db14-d856-a37f-ffd4017f0000 https://daily.jstor.org/palestinians-against-fascism/ https://raseef22.net/english/article/1095802-the-12000-palestinians-who-fought-against-the-nazis-in-world-war-ii https://www.jpost.com/arab-israeli-conflict/when-palestinian-arabs-and-jews-fought-the-nazis-side-by-side-593052 12,000 soldiers who fought to help save the Jewish people, and look how the British and zionists treated them afterwards. They were made to suffer the consequences of WW2 despite having nothing to do with anything, somehow all the western nations didn't do anything and Germany in particular. And this is a lot more than any of the [zionists and founders of Israel did for the holocaust victims](https://weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/1181/zionism-and-holocaustabuse/) who only cared about using the holocaust for PR and Ben-Gurion was only concerned about the state of Israel over holocaust victims/survivors: > In spite of the certainty that genocide was being carried out, the Jewish Agency executive did not deviate appreciably from its routine ... Two facts can be definitively stated: Ben-Gurion did not put the rescue effort above Zionist politics and he did not regard it as a principle task demanding his personal leadership. > Ben-Gurion was clear that in the event of “a conflict of interest between saving individual Jews and the good of the Zionist enterprise, we shall say the enterprise comes first” > > From the outset of the war the Zionists took a conscious decision that their priority was the building of a Jewish state, not the rescue of Jews from Europe. They actively opposed Jews going anywhere but Palestine. When Britain agreed to the Kindertransport - the admission of 10,000 Jewish children from Germany after the Krystallnacht pogrom - David Ben Gurion was furious. > > “If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel.” - Ben-Gurion (Quoted on pp 855-56 in Shabtai Teveth’s Ben-Gurion in a slightly different translation).
2
henryptung 15 hr ago +1
Everyone can see Trump burning down US hegemony around the world, and it's mask off time. I'm guessing Israel is going all out to seize what it can now, and once its ties with the US really break down, it's going to pivot, realign with a US adversary, and blame everything they did on bad US influence.
1
Xpmonkey 18 hr ago
Yatzee shit. Prove me wrong. 🤡
0
lizkbyer 14 hr ago -1
Genocide by bullfozer🙄
-1
BWWFC 23 hr ago -6
there's really *no other* roads or paths? r/fuckcars ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯ antisemitic now?
-6
trbotwuk 1 day ago -20
Iran will eventually get around to dealing with Israel.
-20
deannickers 23 hr ago
What do you mean?
0
trbotwuk 22 hr ago -1
Iran will more than likely come out on top and be the leader of the area. Israel has done many bad things and at the moment are allowed to for example commit genocide freely. The world can thank Trumpf for giving Iran the idea to control the straight of Hormuz. Pretty much handing Iran the entire deck of cards.
-1
deannickers 23 hr ago -48
The demolitions appear to be part of a long planned road and Area C enforcement action, not a random act of destruction. Israel’s case is that the structures were illegal, obstructed a road intended to improve Palestinian traffic flow, and that the bypass preserves Palestinian north-south movement while reducing friction near Ma’ale Adumim. Not some random bull dozing of shops. Terrible journalism.
-48
JohnnyGFX 23 hr ago +40
Nobody said Israel’s systematic destruction of Palestinians or their shops was random…
40
deannickers 23 hr ago -37
Can you see the difference in the way that this would change the way the info is presented? "Israeli bulldozers raze about 50 Palestinian shops ahead of settlement-linked road project" is different than, "Israel conducted planned demolitions of Palestinian Shops ahead of Palestinian settlement linking project". The former is sensationalist outrage bait that y'all are falling for.
-37
PlasterCactus 22 hr ago +36
>is different than Both your sentences say almost the exact same thing with slightly different wording. The fact you see it as "sensationalist outrage bait" tells us all we need to know about your bias. "Palestinian officials say the road is part of a broader plan to keep Palestinian vehicles off a new highway being built to serve nearby Israeli settlements."
36
JohnnyGFX 22 hr ago +34
Ahhh… so you’re saying that if Israel’s destruction of the Palestinian people or their shops is framed less negatively in the media, then it wouldn’t seem as horrible as it is? I’m pretty sure that no matter how much lipstick you try to put on that pig; it’s still a pig.
34
chappell-hoenn 22 hr ago +15
All I have to do is tell them I’m gonna blow up their house and then it’s ok right (This is a hypothetical and not directed at any specific person before anyone wants to claim that)
15
Awesome_Leaf 15 hr ago +3
tell them, as in the hitchhikers guide classic: > "on display" in a disused lavatory, at the bottom of a locked filing cabinet, stuck in a cellar behind a door with a sign saying "Beware of the Leopard".
3
LazarusPizza 13 hr ago +4
This is a level of stupidity I rarely have the pleasure of encountering. Highlights include: 1- It's okay to ruin lives and destroy people's home, and probably kill them if I have planned it for a while now. I wonder what the moratorium is on that. How far back did I have to have drawn up the plans for it to be ok? 2- If you portray a shitty event in a positive way, then it is portrayed as less shitty. Really!? Stellar use of gray matter with this brilliant thought. At this point I would normally have some sort of question aimed at the person. However, I can't do that in your case because I can't trust you to have the capacity to think.
4
← Back to Board